WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.470 align:start position:0%
 
In<00:00:00.400><c> 1992,</c><00:00:01.360><c> a</c><00:00:01.440><c> 17-year-old</c><00:00:02.120><c> female</c><00:00:02.480><c> was</c><00:00:02.920><c> raped</c>

00:00:03.470 --> 00:00:03.480 align:start position:0%
In 1992, a 17-year-old female was raped
 

00:00:03.480 --> 00:00:05.350 align:start position:0%
In 1992, a 17-year-old female was raped
after<00:00:03.800><c> working</c><00:00:04.200><c> a</c><00:00:04.280><c> night</c><00:00:04.560><c> time</c><00:00:04.760><c> shift</c><00:00:05.240><c> at</c>

00:00:05.350 --> 00:00:05.360 align:start position:0%
after working a night time shift at
 

00:00:05.360 --> 00:00:07.270 align:start position:0%
after working a night time shift at
McDonald's.<00:00:06.000><c> She</c><00:00:06.160><c> gave</c><00:00:06.520><c> a</c><00:00:06.560><c> description</c><00:00:07.160><c> of</c>

00:00:07.270 --> 00:00:07.280 align:start position:0%
McDonald's. She gave a description of
 

00:00:07.280 --> 00:00:09.350 align:start position:0%
McDonald's. She gave a description of
her<00:00:07.400><c> attacker</c><00:00:07.880><c> to</c><00:00:08.040><c> police</c><00:00:08.560><c> and</c><00:00:08.760><c> she</c><00:00:08.920><c> said</c><00:00:09.200><c> she</c>

00:00:09.350 --> 00:00:09.360 align:start position:0%
her attacker to police and she said she
 

00:00:09.360 --> 00:00:11.070 align:start position:0%
her attacker to police and she said she
recognized<00:00:09.920><c> the</c><00:00:10.000><c> man</c><00:00:10.400><c> as</c><00:00:10.520><c> a</c><00:00:10.600><c> McDonald's</c>

00:00:11.070 --> 00:00:11.080 align:start position:0%
recognized the man as a McDonald's
 

00:00:11.080 --> 00:00:13.950 align:start position:0%
recognized the man as a McDonald's
customer<00:00:11.680><c> from</c><00:00:11.960><c> 3</c><00:00:12.240><c> weeks</c><00:00:12.680><c> earlier.</c><00:00:13.280><c> 3</c><00:00:13.440><c> days</c>

00:00:13.950 --> 00:00:13.960 align:start position:0%
customer from 3 weeks earlier. 3 days
 

00:00:13.960 --> 00:00:15.430 align:start position:0%
customer from 3 weeks earlier. 3 days
after<00:00:14.160><c> the</c><00:00:14.280><c> attack,</c><00:00:14.680><c> she</c><00:00:14.800><c> called</c><00:00:15.000><c> the</c><00:00:15.080><c> police</c>

00:00:15.430 --> 00:00:15.440 align:start position:0%
after the attack, she called the police
 

00:00:15.440 --> 00:00:17.070 align:start position:0%
after the attack, she called the police
saying<00:00:15.680><c> that</c><00:00:15.800><c> she</c><00:00:15.960><c> saw</c><00:00:16.240><c> her</c><00:00:16.440><c> attacker</c><00:00:16.880><c> in</c><00:00:17.000><c> the</c>

00:00:17.070 --> 00:00:17.080 align:start position:0%
saying that she saw her attacker in the
 

00:00:17.080 --> 00:00:19.550 align:start position:0%
saying that she saw her attacker in the
McDonald's<00:00:17.560><c> parking</c><00:00:17.920><c> lot</c><00:00:18.320><c> and</c><00:00:18.560><c> 22-year-old</c>

00:00:19.550 --> 00:00:19.560 align:start position:0%
McDonald's parking lot and 22-year-old
 

00:00:19.560 --> 00:00:22.150 align:start position:0%
McDonald's parking lot and 22-year-old
Deon<00:00:19.960><c> Herrol</c><00:00:20.720><c> was</c><00:00:20.880><c> subsequently</c><00:00:21.520><c> arrested.</c>

00:00:22.150 --> 00:00:22.160 align:start position:0%
Deon Herrol was subsequently arrested.
 

00:00:22.160 --> 00:00:24.110 align:start position:0%
Deon Herrol was subsequently arrested.
Herrol<00:00:22.600><c> said</c><00:00:22.760><c> he</c><00:00:22.880><c> was</c><00:00:23.000><c> a</c><00:00:23.080><c> frequent</c><00:00:23.480><c> customer</c>

00:00:24.110 --> 00:00:24.120 align:start position:0%
Herrol said he was a frequent customer
 

00:00:24.120 --> 00:00:26.070 align:start position:0%
Herrol said he was a frequent customer
of<00:00:24.240><c> McDonald's</c><00:00:24.960><c> as</c><00:00:25.120><c> he</c><00:00:25.280><c> lived</c><00:00:25.640><c> across</c><00:00:25.960><c> the</c>

00:00:26.070 --> 00:00:26.080 align:start position:0%
of McDonald's as he lived across the
 

00:00:26.080 --> 00:00:28.630 align:start position:0%
of McDonald's as he lived across the
street.<00:00:26.720><c> He</c><00:00:26.840><c> insisted</c><00:00:27.680><c> he</c><00:00:27.840><c> was</c><00:00:28.000><c> innocent</c><00:00:28.520><c> and</c>

00:00:28.630 --> 00:00:28.640 align:start position:0%
street. He insisted he was innocent and
 

00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:30.830 align:start position:0%
street. He insisted he was innocent and
he<00:00:28.760><c> presented</c><00:00:29.280><c> an</c><00:00:29.440><c> alibi.</c><00:00:30.080><c> He</c><00:00:30.280><c> said</c><00:00:30.600><c> that</c><00:00:30.760><c> at</c>

00:00:30.830 --> 00:00:30.840 align:start position:0%
he presented an alibi. He said that at
 

00:00:30.840 --> 00:00:32.310 align:start position:0%
he presented an alibi. He said that at
the<00:00:30.920><c> time</c><00:00:31.120><c> of</c><00:00:31.200><c> the</c><00:00:31.280><c> offense,</c><00:00:31.760><c> he</c><00:00:31.880><c> was</c><00:00:32.040><c> playing</c>

00:00:32.310 --> 00:00:32.320 align:start position:0%
the time of the offense, he was playing
 

00:00:32.320 --> 00:00:34.550 align:start position:0%
the time of the offense, he was playing
basketball<00:00:32.920><c> with</c><00:00:33.160><c> friends</c><00:00:33.720><c> including</c><00:00:34.440><c> a</c>

00:00:34.550 --> 00:00:34.560 align:start position:0%
basketball with friends including a
 

00:00:34.560 --> 00:00:36.630 align:start position:0%
basketball with friends including a
police<00:00:35.160><c> detective.</c><00:00:36.000><c> Several</c><00:00:36.360><c> of</c><00:00:36.480><c> these</c>

00:00:36.630 --> 00:00:36.640 align:start position:0%
police detective. Several of these
 

00:00:36.640 --> 00:00:39.150 align:start position:0%
police detective. Several of these
people<00:00:37.000><c> including</c><00:00:37.720><c> the</c><00:00:37.880><c> detective</c><00:00:38.480><c> testified</c>

00:00:39.150 --> 00:00:39.160 align:start position:0%
people including the detective testified
 

00:00:39.160 --> 00:00:41.390 align:start position:0%
people including the detective testified
at<00:00:39.320><c> his</c><00:00:39.480><c> trial,</c><00:00:40.040><c> but</c><00:00:40.240><c> Herrol</c><00:00:41.000><c> was</c><00:00:41.160><c> found</c>

00:00:41.390 --> 00:00:41.400 align:start position:0%
at his trial, but Herrol was found
 

00:00:41.400 --> 00:00:44.150 align:start position:0%
at his trial, but Herrol was found
guilty<00:00:42.000><c> anyway</c><00:00:42.760><c> of</c><00:00:43.040><c> second-degree</c><00:00:43.720><c> sexual</c>

00:00:44.150 --> 00:00:44.160 align:start position:0%
guilty anyway of second-degree sexual
 

00:00:44.160 --> 00:00:46.790 align:start position:0%
guilty anyway of second-degree sexual
assault<00:00:44.560><c> and</c><00:00:44.800><c> spent</c><00:00:45.120><c> 4</c><00:00:45.440><c> years</c><00:00:45.760><c> in</c><00:00:45.960><c> prison</c><00:00:46.480><c> and</c>

00:00:46.790 --> 00:00:46.800 align:start position:0%
assault and spent 4 years in prison and
 

00:00:46.800 --> 00:00:49.430 align:start position:0%
assault and spent 4 years in prison and
two<00:00:47.040><c> decades</c><00:00:47.720><c> on</c><00:00:47.880><c> the</c><00:00:48.040><c> sex</c><00:00:48.360><c> offender</c><00:00:48.720><c> registry</c>

00:00:49.430 --> 00:00:49.440 align:start position:0%
two decades on the sex offender registry
 

00:00:49.440 --> 00:00:51.910 align:start position:0%
two decades on the sex offender registry
before<00:00:49.760><c> he</c><00:00:49.880><c> was</c><00:00:50.080><c> exonerated</c><00:00:50.960><c> with</c><00:00:51.120><c> the</c><00:00:51.240><c> use</c><00:00:51.760><c> of</c>

00:00:51.910 --> 00:00:51.920 align:start position:0%
before he was exonerated with the use of
 

00:00:51.920 --> 00:00:54.630 align:start position:0%
before he was exonerated with the use of
DNA.<00:00:52.720><c> Deon</c><00:00:53.000><c> Herrol</c><00:00:53.280><c> did</c><00:00:53.440><c> not</c><00:00:53.720><c> commit</c><00:00:54.440><c> this</c>

00:00:54.630 --> 00:00:54.640 align:start position:0%
DNA. Deon Herrol did not commit this
 

00:00:54.640 --> 00:00:56.910 align:start position:0%
DNA. Deon Herrol did not commit this
crime<00:00:55.240><c> and</c><00:00:55.480><c> he</c><00:00:55.600><c> provided</c><00:00:56.000><c> an</c><00:00:56.120><c> alibi</c><00:00:56.640><c> as</c>

00:00:56.910 --> 00:00:56.920 align:start position:0%
crime and he provided an alibi as
 

00:00:56.920 --> 00:00:59.030 align:start position:0%
crime and he provided an alibi as
evidence<00:00:57.320><c> that</c><00:00:57.440><c> he</c><00:00:57.560><c> was</c><00:00:57.720><c> somewhere</c><00:00:58.160><c> else</c><00:00:58.800><c> when</c>

00:00:59.030 --> 00:00:59.040 align:start position:0%
evidence that he was somewhere else when
 

00:00:59.040 --> 00:01:00.590 align:start position:0%
evidence that he was somewhere else when
the<00:00:59.120><c> crime</c><00:00:59.440><c> occurred.</c><00:01:00.120><c> Yet</c><00:01:00.160><c> the</c><00:01:00.280><c> police</c>

00:01:00.590 --> 00:01:00.600 align:start position:0%
the crime occurred. Yet the police
 

00:01:00.600 --> 00:01:03.110 align:start position:0%
the crime occurred. Yet the police
investigators<00:01:01.560><c> as</c><00:01:01.760><c> well</c><00:01:01.920><c> as</c><00:01:02.000><c> the</c><00:01:02.080><c> jury</c><00:01:02.960><c> did</c>

00:01:03.110 --> 00:01:03.120 align:start position:0%
investigators as well as the jury did
 

00:01:03.120 --> 00:01:06.630 align:start position:0%
investigators as well as the jury did
not<00:01:03.360><c> see</c><00:01:03.560><c> his</c><00:01:03.760><c> alibi</c><00:01:04.400><c> as</c><00:01:04.559><c> credible.</c><00:01:05.640><c> Why</c><00:01:05.840><c> not?</c>

00:01:06.630 --> 00:01:06.640 align:start position:0%
not see his alibi as credible. Why not?
 

00:01:06.640 --> 00:01:08.190 align:start position:0%
not see his alibi as credible. Why not?
It<00:01:06.760><c> may</c><00:01:06.920><c> be</c><00:01:07.040><c> surprising</c><00:01:07.560><c> to</c><00:01:07.680><c> you</c><00:01:07.920><c> that</c><00:01:08.120><c> the</c>

00:01:08.190 --> 00:01:08.200 align:start position:0%
It may be surprising to you that the
 

00:01:08.200 --> 00:01:10.550 align:start position:0%
It may be surprising to you that the
statement,<00:01:08.800><c> quote,</c><00:01:09.200><c> "An</c><00:01:09.400><c> alibi</c><00:01:10.040><c> is</c><00:01:10.240><c> a</c><00:01:10.320><c> good</c>

00:01:10.550 --> 00:01:10.560 align:start position:0%
statement, quote, "An alibi is a good
 

00:01:10.560 --> 00:01:13.270 align:start position:0%
statement, quote, "An alibi is a good
defense"<00:01:11.480><c> is</c><00:01:11.680><c> considered</c><00:01:12.040><c> a</c><00:01:12.120><c> myth</c><00:01:12.840><c> by</c><00:01:13.000><c> some</c>

00:01:13.270 --> 00:01:13.280 align:start position:0%
defense" is considered a myth by some
 

00:01:13.280 --> 00:01:15.350 align:start position:0%
defense" is considered a myth by some
lawyers<00:01:13.760><c> and</c><00:01:14.000><c> legal</c><00:01:14.240><c> scholars.</c><00:01:14.880><c> The</c><00:01:15.000><c> myth</c><00:01:15.240><c> of</c>

00:01:15.350 --> 00:01:15.360 align:start position:0%
lawyers and legal scholars. The myth of
 

00:01:15.360 --> 00:01:17.750 align:start position:0%
lawyers and legal scholars. The myth of
the<00:01:15.520><c> alibi,</c><00:01:16.360><c> they</c><00:01:16.520><c> call</c><00:01:16.800><c> it.</c><00:01:17.320><c> Some</c><00:01:17.520><c> defense</c>

00:01:17.750 --> 00:01:17.760 align:start position:0%
the alibi, they call it. Some defense
 

00:01:17.760 --> 00:01:19.230 align:start position:0%
the alibi, they call it. Some defense
attorneys<00:01:18.080><c> even</c><00:01:18.280><c> go</c><00:01:18.400><c> so</c><00:01:18.520><c> far</c><00:01:18.720><c> as</c><00:01:18.840><c> to</c><00:01:18.920><c> believe</c>

00:01:19.230 --> 00:01:19.240 align:start position:0%
attorneys even go so far as to believe
 

00:01:19.240 --> 00:01:21.630 align:start position:0%
attorneys even go so far as to believe
that<00:01:19.360><c> an</c><00:01:19.520><c> alibi</c><00:01:20.040><c> is</c><00:01:20.240><c> without</c><00:01:20.600><c> a</c><00:01:20.680><c> doubt</c><00:01:21.400><c> the</c>

00:01:21.630 --> 00:01:21.640 align:start position:0%
that an alibi is without a doubt the
 

00:01:21.640 --> 00:01:24.150 align:start position:0%
that an alibi is without a doubt the
worst<00:01:22.120><c> possible</c><00:01:22.600><c> defense</c><00:01:23.200><c> to</c><00:01:23.440><c> a</c><00:01:23.560><c> criminal</c>

00:01:24.150 --> 00:01:24.160 align:start position:0%
worst possible defense to a criminal
 

00:01:24.160 --> 00:01:26.870 align:start position:0%
worst possible defense to a criminal
charge.<00:01:25.000><c> This</c><00:01:25.200><c> may</c><00:01:25.640><c> come</c><00:01:25.840><c> as</c><00:01:25.960><c> a</c><00:01:26.000><c> shock</c><00:01:26.400><c> to</c><00:01:26.600><c> most</c>

00:01:26.870 --> 00:01:26.880 align:start position:0%
charge. This may come as a shock to most
 

00:01:26.880 --> 00:01:29.390 align:start position:0%
charge. This may come as a shock to most
people.<00:01:27.320><c> Alibis</c><00:01:27.880><c> as</c><00:01:28.040><c> seen</c><00:01:28.280><c> in</c><00:01:28.480><c> media,</c><00:01:28.880><c> movies,</c>

00:01:29.390 --> 00:01:29.400 align:start position:0%
people. Alibis as seen in media, movies,
 

00:01:29.400 --> 00:01:31.430 align:start position:0%
people. Alibis as seen in media, movies,
cop<00:01:29.680><c> again</c><00:01:30.000><c> shows</c><00:01:30.400><c> like</c><00:01:30.600><c> Law</c><00:01:30.760><c> &amp;</c><00:01:30.960><c> Order</c><00:01:31.320><c> are</c>

00:01:31.430 --> 00:01:31.440 align:start position:0%
cop again shows like Law &amp; Order are
 

00:01:31.440 --> 00:01:33.070 align:start position:0%
cop again shows like Law &amp; Order are
often<00:01:31.720><c> portrayed</c><00:01:32.200><c> as</c><00:01:32.360><c> the</c><00:01:32.520><c> perfect</c>

00:01:33.070 --> 00:01:33.080 align:start position:0%
often portrayed as the perfect
 

00:01:33.080 --> 00:01:35.790 align:start position:0%
often portrayed as the perfect
antithesis<00:01:33.840><c> to</c><00:01:34.000><c> the</c><00:01:34.160><c> smoking</c><00:01:34.920><c> gun.</c><00:01:35.520><c> A</c><00:01:35.600><c> good</c>

00:01:35.790 --> 00:01:35.800 align:start position:0%
antithesis to the smoking gun. A good
 

00:01:35.800 --> 00:01:38.790 align:start position:0%
antithesis to the smoking gun. A good
alibi<00:01:36.200><c> gets</c><00:01:36.480><c> you</c><00:01:36.600><c> off,</c><00:01:37.280><c> or</c><00:01:37.840><c> so</c><00:01:38.080><c> they've</c><00:01:38.320><c> said.</c>

00:01:38.790 --> 00:01:38.800 align:start position:0%
alibi gets you off, or so they've said.
 

00:01:38.800 --> 00:01:42.070 align:start position:0%
alibi gets you off, or so they've said.
That,<00:01:39.080><c> however,</c><00:01:40.000><c> is</c><00:01:40.600><c> obviously</c><00:01:41.560><c> not</c><00:01:41.760><c> always</c>

00:01:42.070 --> 00:01:42.080 align:start position:0%
That, however, is obviously not always
 

00:01:42.080 --> 00:01:44.670 align:start position:0%
That, however, is obviously not always
the<00:01:42.160><c> case.</c><00:01:42.760><c> In</c><00:01:42.840><c> about</c><00:01:43.240><c> two-thirds</c><00:01:44.040><c> of</c><00:01:44.160><c> DNA</c>

00:01:44.670 --> 00:01:44.680 align:start position:0%
the case. In about two-thirds of DNA
 

00:01:44.680 --> 00:01:46.670 align:start position:0%
the case. In about two-thirds of DNA
exoneration<00:01:45.360><c> cases,</c><00:01:46.000><c> the</c><00:01:46.320><c> innocent</c>

00:01:46.670 --> 00:01:46.680 align:start position:0%
exoneration cases, the innocent
 

00:01:46.680 --> 00:01:48.630 align:start position:0%
exoneration cases, the innocent
defendants<00:01:47.240><c> offered</c><00:01:47.520><c> an</c><00:01:47.640><c> alibi</c><00:01:48.200><c> which</c><00:01:48.440><c> was</c>

00:01:48.630 --> 00:01:48.640 align:start position:0%
defendants offered an alibi which was
 

00:01:48.640 --> 00:01:51.470 align:start position:0%
defendants offered an alibi which was
not<00:01:48.960><c> believed</c><00:01:49.480><c> by</c><00:01:49.640><c> law</c><00:01:49.840><c> enforcement.</c><00:01:50.720><c> Worse,</c>

00:01:51.470 --> 00:01:51.480 align:start position:0%
not believed by law enforcement. Worse,
 

00:01:51.480 --> 00:01:53.590 align:start position:0%
not believed by law enforcement. Worse,
weak<00:01:51.800><c> alibis</c><00:01:52.520><c> were</c><00:01:52.640><c> then</c><00:01:52.920><c> used</c><00:01:53.480><c> by</c>

00:01:53.590 --> 00:01:53.600 align:start position:0%
weak alibis were then used by
 

00:01:53.600 --> 00:01:56.350 align:start position:0%
weak alibis were then used by
prosecutors<00:01:54.520><c> as</c><00:01:54.760><c> incriminating</c><00:01:55.560><c> evidence</c><00:01:56.120><c> at</c>

00:01:56.350 --> 00:01:56.360 align:start position:0%
prosecutors as incriminating evidence at
 

00:01:56.360 --> 00:01:58.310 align:start position:0%
prosecutors as incriminating evidence at
trial.<00:01:57.040><c> The</c><00:01:57.120><c> myth</c><00:01:57.680><c> is</c><00:01:57.840><c> not</c><00:01:58.040><c> simply</c>

00:01:58.310 --> 00:01:58.320 align:start position:0%
trial. The myth is not simply
 

00:01:58.320 --> 00:02:01.430 align:start position:0%
trial. The myth is not simply
conjecture.<00:01:59.160><c> It</c><00:01:59.480><c> is</c><00:01:59.760><c> supported</c><00:02:00.400><c> by</c><00:02:00.680><c> evidence.</c>

00:02:01.430 --> 00:02:01.440 align:start position:0%
conjecture. It is supported by evidence.
 

00:02:01.440 --> 00:02:04.430 align:start position:0%
conjecture. It is supported by evidence.
Recent<00:02:01.760><c> studies</c><00:02:02.240><c> from</c><00:02:02.400><c> 2023</c><00:02:03.160><c> and</c><00:02:03.320><c> 2022</c><00:02:04.160><c> found</c>

00:02:04.430 --> 00:02:04.440 align:start position:0%
Recent studies from 2023 and 2022 found
 

00:02:04.440 --> 00:02:06.590 align:start position:0%
Recent studies from 2023 and 2022 found
that<00:02:04.560><c> in</c><00:02:04.680><c> many</c><00:02:04.960><c> cases</c><00:02:05.400><c> where</c><00:02:05.520><c> an</c><00:02:05.640><c> alibi</c><00:02:06.360><c> has</c>

00:02:06.590 --> 00:02:06.600 align:start position:0%
that in many cases where an alibi has
 

00:02:06.600 --> 00:02:08.270 align:start position:0%
that in many cases where an alibi has
been<00:02:06.760><c> discredited</c><00:02:07.479><c> for</c><00:02:07.640><c> either</c><00:02:07.880><c> lack</c><00:02:08.160><c> of</c>

00:02:08.270 --> 00:02:08.280 align:start position:0%
been discredited for either lack of
 

00:02:08.280 --> 00:02:10.230 align:start position:0%
been discredited for either lack of
evidence,<00:02:08.720><c> contradictions,</c><00:02:09.479><c> or</c><00:02:09.600><c> motive,</c><00:02:10.119><c> the</c>

00:02:10.230 --> 00:02:10.240 align:start position:0%
evidence, contradictions, or motive, the
 

00:02:10.240 --> 00:02:12.310 align:start position:0%
evidence, contradictions, or motive, the
probability<00:02:10.800><c> of</c><00:02:10.880><c> a</c><00:02:10.920><c> conviction</c><00:02:11.720><c> is</c><00:02:11.920><c> usually</c>

00:02:12.310 --> 00:02:12.320 align:start position:0%
probability of a conviction is usually
 

00:02:12.320 --> 00:02:14.910 align:start position:0%
probability of a conviction is usually
high.<00:02:12.880><c> An</c><00:02:13.040><c> alibi</c><00:02:13.560><c> presented</c><00:02:14.000><c> at</c><00:02:14.160><c> all,</c><00:02:14.680><c> some</c>

00:02:14.910 --> 00:02:14.920 align:start position:0%
high. An alibi presented at all, some
 

00:02:14.920 --> 00:02:16.910 align:start position:0%
high. An alibi presented at all, some
lawyers<00:02:15.240><c> argue,</c><00:02:15.800><c> even</c><00:02:16.040><c> if</c><00:02:16.160><c> an</c><00:02:16.280><c> alibi</c><00:02:16.680><c> is</c>

00:02:16.910 --> 00:02:16.920 align:start position:0%
lawyers argue, even if an alibi is
 

00:02:16.920 --> 00:02:19.870 align:start position:0%
lawyers argue, even if an alibi is
factually<00:02:17.600><c> true,</c><00:02:17.959><c> can</c><00:02:18.160><c> almost</c><00:02:18.560><c> guarantee</c><00:02:19.680><c> you</c>

00:02:19.870 --> 00:02:19.880 align:start position:0%
factually true, can almost guarantee you
 

00:02:19.880 --> 00:02:22.430 align:start position:0%
factually true, can almost guarantee you
are<00:02:20.000><c> convicted.</c><00:02:20.959><c> The</c><00:02:21.080><c> most</c><00:02:21.360><c> cynical</c><00:02:21.920><c> of</c><00:02:22.080><c> those</c>

00:02:22.430 --> 00:02:22.440 align:start position:0%
are convicted. The most cynical of those
 

00:02:22.440 --> 00:02:24.190 align:start position:0%
are convicted. The most cynical of those
who<00:02:22.560><c> believe</c><00:02:22.920><c> the</c><00:02:23.040><c> myth</c><00:02:23.400><c> of</c><00:02:23.520><c> the</c><00:02:23.680><c> alibi</c>

00:02:24.190 --> 00:02:24.200 align:start position:0%
who believe the myth of the alibi
 

00:02:24.200 --> 00:02:26.510 align:start position:0%
who believe the myth of the alibi
conclude<00:02:24.800><c> that</c><00:02:25.080><c> unless</c><00:02:25.560><c> you</c><00:02:25.680><c> can</c><00:02:25.800><c> document</c>

00:02:26.510 --> 00:02:26.520 align:start position:0%
conclude that unless you can document
 

00:02:26.520 --> 00:02:28.270 align:start position:0%
conclude that unless you can document
your<00:02:26.800><c> alibi</c><00:02:27.200><c> with</c><00:02:27.440><c> records</c><00:02:27.880><c> such</c><00:02:28.080><c> as</c><00:02:28.200><c> a</c>

00:02:28.270 --> 00:02:28.280 align:start position:0%
your alibi with records such as a
 

00:02:28.280 --> 00:02:30.470 align:start position:0%
your alibi with records such as a
passport<00:02:28.800><c> stamp</c><00:02:29.520><c> showing</c><00:02:29.880><c> that</c><00:02:30.000><c> you</c><00:02:30.080><c> were</c><00:02:30.320><c> out</c>

00:02:30.470 --> 00:02:30.480 align:start position:0%
passport stamp showing that you were out
 

00:02:30.480 --> 00:02:31.790 align:start position:0%
passport stamp showing that you were out
of<00:02:30.560><c> the</c><00:02:30.640><c> country</c><00:02:31.200><c> at</c><00:02:31.320><c> the</c><00:02:31.400><c> time</c><00:02:31.600><c> of</c><00:02:31.680><c> the</c>

00:02:31.790 --> 00:02:31.800 align:start position:0%
of the country at the time of the
 

00:02:31.800 --> 00:02:34.350 align:start position:0%
of the country at the time of the
offense,<00:02:32.400><c> you</c><00:02:32.600><c> should</c><00:02:32.800><c> consider</c><00:02:33.640><c> not</c>

00:02:34.350 --> 00:02:34.360 align:start position:0%
offense, you should consider not
 

00:02:34.360 --> 00:02:36.910 align:start position:0%
offense, you should consider not
presenting<00:02:34.800><c> an</c><00:02:34.920><c> alibi</c><00:02:35.720><c> at</c><00:02:35.920><c> all.</c><00:02:36.440><c> This</c><00:02:36.680><c> is</c><00:02:36.800><c> the</c>

00:02:36.910 --> 00:02:36.920 align:start position:0%
presenting an alibi at all. This is the
 

00:02:36.920 --> 00:02:39.270 align:start position:0%
presenting an alibi at all. This is the
Rebuttal<00:02:37.160><c> podcast,</c><00:02:38.040><c> and</c><00:02:38.320><c> we</c><00:02:38.840><c> are</c><00:02:38.920><c> going</c><00:02:39.200><c> to</c>

00:02:39.270 --> 00:02:39.280 align:start position:0%
Rebuttal podcast, and we are going to
 

00:02:39.280 --> 00:02:41.470 align:start position:0%
Rebuttal podcast, and we are going to
get<00:02:39.400><c> into</c><00:02:39.680><c> it.</c><00:02:40.120><c> First,</c><00:02:40.600><c> in</c><00:02:40.720><c> a</c><00:02:40.760><c> criminal</c><00:02:41.120><c> case,</c>

00:02:41.470 --> 00:02:41.480 align:start position:0%
get into it. First, in a criminal case,
 

00:02:41.480 --> 00:02:44.110 align:start position:0%
get into it. First, in a criminal case,
the<00:02:41.680><c> state</c><00:02:42.360><c> has</c><00:02:42.560><c> the</c><00:02:42.720><c> burden</c><00:02:43.400><c> to</c><00:02:43.680><c> prove</c><00:02:44.000><c> the</c>

00:02:44.110 --> 00:02:44.120 align:start position:0%
the state has the burden to prove the
 

00:02:44.120 --> 00:02:45.910 align:start position:0%
the state has the burden to prove the
charges<00:02:44.560><c> beyond</c><00:02:44.880><c> a</c><00:02:44.920><c> reasonable</c><00:02:45.320><c> doubt,</c><00:02:45.760><c> and</c>

00:02:45.910 --> 00:02:45.920 align:start position:0%
charges beyond a reasonable doubt, and
 

00:02:45.920 --> 00:02:48.190 align:start position:0%
charges beyond a reasonable doubt, and
this<00:02:46.120><c> burden</c><00:02:46.520><c> is</c><00:02:46.720><c> never</c><00:02:47.400><c> supposed</c><00:02:47.800><c> to</c><00:02:47.920><c> shift</c>

00:02:48.190 --> 00:02:48.200 align:start position:0%
this burden is never supposed to shift
 

00:02:48.200 --> 00:02:50.350 align:start position:0%
this burden is never supposed to shift
to<00:02:48.280><c> the</c><00:02:48.400><c> defendant.</c><00:02:49.360><c> It</c><00:02:49.480><c> often</c><00:02:49.760><c> does,</c>

00:02:50.350 --> 00:02:50.360 align:start position:0%
to the defendant. It often does,
 

00:02:50.360 --> 00:02:52.150 align:start position:0%
to the defendant. It often does,
however,<00:02:50.959><c> when</c><00:02:51.120><c> a</c><00:02:51.160><c> defendant</c><00:02:51.680><c> presents</c>

00:02:52.150 --> 00:02:52.160 align:start position:0%
however, when a defendant presents
 

00:02:52.160 --> 00:02:54.110 align:start position:0%
however, when a defendant presents
evidence<00:02:52.800><c> of</c><00:02:52.920><c> an</c><00:02:53.040><c> alibi,</c><00:02:53.680><c> even</c><00:02:53.880><c> though</c><00:02:54.000><c> the</c>

00:02:54.110 --> 00:02:54.120 align:start position:0%
evidence of an alibi, even though the
 

00:02:54.120 --> 00:02:56.990 align:start position:0%
evidence of an alibi, even though the
jury<00:02:54.480><c> is</c><00:02:54.680><c> in</c><00:02:54.959><c> instructed</c><00:02:55.760><c> not</c><00:02:56.160><c> to</c><00:02:56.280><c> do</c><00:02:56.480><c> so,</c><00:02:56.800><c> it</c>

00:02:56.990 --> 00:02:57.000 align:start position:0%
jury is in instructed not to do so, it
 

00:02:57.000 --> 00:02:59.270 align:start position:0%
jury is in instructed not to do so, it
invariably<00:02:57.720><c> happens</c><00:02:58.200><c> that</c><00:02:58.320><c> if</c><00:02:58.400><c> the</c><00:02:58.560><c> alibi</c><00:02:59.040><c> is</c>

00:02:59.270 --> 00:02:59.280 align:start position:0%
invariably happens that if the alibi is
 

00:02:59.280 --> 00:03:01.110 align:start position:0%
invariably happens that if the alibi is
not<00:02:59.600><c> adequately</c><00:03:00.080><c> established</c><00:03:00.800><c> by</c><00:03:01.000><c> the</c>

00:03:01.110 --> 00:03:01.120 align:start position:0%
not adequately established by the
 

00:03:01.120 --> 00:03:03.350 align:start position:0%
not adequately established by the
defendant,<00:03:01.680><c> the</c><00:03:01.800><c> jury,</c><00:03:02.440><c> no</c><00:03:02.560><c> matter</c><00:03:02.880><c> how</c><00:03:03.080><c> much</c>

00:03:03.350 --> 00:03:03.360 align:start position:0%
defendant, the jury, no matter how much
 

00:03:03.360 --> 00:03:05.430 align:start position:0%
defendant, the jury, no matter how much
they<00:03:03.480><c> are</c><00:03:03.560><c> instructed</c><00:03:04.120><c> not</c><00:03:04.360><c> to,</c><00:03:04.720><c> concludes</c>

00:03:05.430 --> 00:03:05.440 align:start position:0%
they are instructed not to, concludes
 

00:03:05.440 --> 00:03:07.630 align:start position:0%
they are instructed not to, concludes
that<00:03:05.600><c> the</c><00:03:05.680><c> defendant</c><00:03:06.519><c> must</c><00:03:07.040><c> be</c><00:03:07.200><c> guilty</c>

00:03:07.630 --> 00:03:07.640 align:start position:0%
that the defendant must be guilty
 

00:03:07.640 --> 00:03:10.710 align:start position:0%
that the defendant must be guilty
because<00:03:08.400><c> he</c><00:03:08.560><c> presented</c><00:03:09.200><c> a</c><00:03:09.400><c> phony</c><00:03:09.880><c> alibi.</c><00:03:10.560><c> To</c>

00:03:10.710 --> 00:03:10.720 align:start position:0%
because he presented a phony alibi. To
 

00:03:10.720 --> 00:03:13.710 align:start position:0%
because he presented a phony alibi. To
be<00:03:10.880><c> clear,</c><00:03:11.760><c> a</c><00:03:12.000><c> phony</c><00:03:12.440><c> alibi,</c><00:03:13.000><c> or</c><00:03:13.239><c> a</c><00:03:13.360><c> weak</c>

00:03:13.710 --> 00:03:13.720 align:start position:0%
be clear, a phony alibi, or a weak
 

00:03:13.720 --> 00:03:16.390 align:start position:0%
be clear, a phony alibi, or a weak
alibi,<00:03:14.239><c> or</c><00:03:14.519><c> a</c><00:03:14.600><c> discredited</c><00:03:15.280><c> alibi</c><00:03:15.840><c> is</c><00:03:16.040><c> not</c>

00:03:16.390 --> 00:03:16.400 align:start position:0%
alibi, or a discredited alibi is not
 

00:03:16.400 --> 00:03:18.070 align:start position:0%
alibi, or a discredited alibi is not
evidence<00:03:16.920><c> the</c><00:03:17.040><c> defendant</c><00:03:17.440><c> committed</c><00:03:17.959><c> the</c>

00:03:18.070 --> 00:03:18.080 align:start position:0%
evidence the defendant committed the
 

00:03:18.080 --> 00:03:20.390 align:start position:0%
evidence the defendant committed the
crime<00:03:18.480><c> they</c><00:03:18.600><c> are</c><00:03:18.720><c> actually</c><00:03:19.200><c> accused</c><00:03:19.880><c> of.</c><00:03:20.160><c> For</c>

00:03:20.390 --> 00:03:20.400 align:start position:0%
crime they are actually accused of. For
 

00:03:20.400 --> 00:03:22.870 align:start position:0%
crime they are actually accused of. For
example,<00:03:20.800><c> if</c><00:03:20.920><c> I</c><00:03:20.959><c> got</c><00:03:21.200><c> my</c><00:03:21.320><c> days</c><00:03:21.680><c> mixed</c><00:03:22.160><c> up</c><00:03:22.519><c> about</c>

00:03:22.870 --> 00:03:22.880 align:start position:0%
example, if I got my days mixed up about
 

00:03:22.880 --> 00:03:26.790 align:start position:0%
example, if I got my days mixed up about
where<00:03:23.080><c> I</c><00:03:23.200><c> was</c><00:03:23.720><c> 4</c><00:03:24.040><c> Tuesdays</c><00:03:24.560><c> ago</c><00:03:24.840><c> at</c><00:03:25.000><c> 9:37</c><00:03:26.000><c> a.m.,</c>

00:03:26.790 --> 00:03:26.800 align:start position:0%
where I was 4 Tuesdays ago at 9:37 a.m.,
 

00:03:26.800 --> 00:03:28.190 align:start position:0%
where I was 4 Tuesdays ago at 9:37 a.m.,
that<00:03:27.000><c> doesn't</c><00:03:27.280><c> necessarily</c><00:03:27.880><c> make</c><00:03:28.080><c> the</c>

00:03:28.190 --> 00:03:28.200 align:start position:0%
that doesn't necessarily make the
 

00:03:28.200 --> 00:03:30.550 align:start position:0%
that doesn't necessarily make the
government's<00:03:28.600><c> case</c><00:03:28.800><c> against</c><00:03:29.200><c> me</c><00:03:29.519><c> stronger,</c>

00:03:30.550 --> 00:03:30.560 align:start position:0%
government's case against me stronger,
 

00:03:30.560 --> 00:03:33.630 align:start position:0%
government's case against me stronger,
right?<00:03:31.400><c> Juries</c><00:03:32.200><c> often</c><00:03:32.519><c> find</c><00:03:32.760><c> that</c><00:03:32.880><c> it</c><00:03:33.000><c> does.</c>

00:03:33.630 --> 00:03:33.640 align:start position:0%
right? Juries often find that it does.
 

00:03:33.640 --> 00:03:35.949 align:start position:0%
right? Juries often find that it does.
By<00:03:33.840><c> presenting</c><00:03:34.280><c> the</c><00:03:34.400><c> alibi,</c><00:03:35.000><c> some</c><00:03:35.360><c> say,</c><00:03:35.880><c> the</c>

00:03:35.949 --> 00:03:35.959 align:start position:0%
By presenting the alibi, some say, the
 

00:03:35.959 --> 00:03:38.270 align:start position:0%
By presenting the alibi, some say, the
defendant<00:03:36.600><c> in</c><00:03:36.720><c> effect</c><00:03:37.519><c> has</c><00:03:37.680><c> needlessly</c>

00:03:38.270 --> 00:03:38.280 align:start position:0%
defendant in effect has needlessly
 

00:03:38.280 --> 00:03:40.630 align:start position:0%
defendant in effect has needlessly
shifted<00:03:38.600><c> the</c><00:03:38.680><c> burden</c><00:03:39.080><c> to</c><00:03:39.239><c> himself.</c><00:03:40.000><c> Second,</c>

00:03:40.630 --> 00:03:40.640 align:start position:0%
shifted the burden to himself. Second,
 

00:03:40.640 --> 00:03:42.670 align:start position:0%
shifted the burden to himself. Second,
where<00:03:40.920><c> are</c><00:03:41.080><c> innocent</c><00:03:41.440><c> people</c><00:03:41.720><c> usually</c><00:03:42.040><c> found?</c>

00:03:42.670 --> 00:03:42.680 align:start position:0%
where are innocent people usually found?
 

00:03:42.680 --> 00:03:44.150 align:start position:0%
where are innocent people usually found?
They<00:03:42.800><c> are</c><00:03:42.920><c> found</c><00:03:43.160><c> with</c><00:03:43.239><c> their</c><00:03:43.400><c> family</c><00:03:43.920><c> and</c>

00:03:44.150 --> 00:03:44.160 align:start position:0%
They are found with their family and
 

00:03:44.160 --> 00:03:46.190 align:start position:0%
They are found with their family and
friends,<00:03:44.600><c> the</c><00:03:44.680><c> very</c><00:03:44.959><c> people</c><00:03:45.480><c> who</c><00:03:45.720><c> are</c><00:03:45.880><c> not</c>

00:03:46.190 --> 00:03:46.200 align:start position:0%
friends, the very people who are not
 

00:03:46.200 --> 00:03:47.830 align:start position:0%
friends, the very people who are not
seen<00:03:46.480><c> as</c><00:03:46.640><c> credible</c><00:03:46.959><c> witnesses</c><00:03:47.440><c> because</c><00:03:47.720><c> they</c>

00:03:47.830 --> 00:03:47.840 align:start position:0%
seen as credible witnesses because they
 

00:03:47.840 --> 00:03:50.070 align:start position:0%
seen as credible witnesses because they
have<00:03:48.040><c> a</c><00:03:48.120><c> strong</c><00:03:48.680><c> motive</c><00:03:49.040><c> to</c><00:03:49.200><c> fabricate.</c><00:03:49.920><c> At</c>

00:03:50.070 --> 00:03:50.080 align:start position:0%
have a strong motive to fabricate. At
 

00:03:50.080 --> 00:03:52.110 align:start position:0%
have a strong motive to fabricate. At
trial<00:03:50.519><c> then,</c><00:03:51.000><c> instead</c><00:03:51.280><c> of</c><00:03:51.320><c> the</c><00:03:51.400><c> defendant</c>

00:03:52.110 --> 00:03:52.120 align:start position:0%
trial then, instead of the defendant
 

00:03:52.120 --> 00:03:54.910 align:start position:0%
trial then, instead of the defendant
poking<00:03:52.480><c> holes</c><00:03:52.880><c> in</c><00:03:53.080><c> the</c><00:03:53.480><c> state's</c><00:03:54.160><c> evidence</c><00:03:54.720><c> and</c>

00:03:54.910 --> 00:03:54.920 align:start position:0%
poking holes in the state's evidence and
 

00:03:54.920 --> 00:03:56.710 align:start position:0%
poking holes in the state's evidence and
in<00:03:55.120><c> the</c><00:03:55.280><c> state's</c><00:03:55.760><c> case</c><00:03:56.000><c> against</c><00:03:56.320><c> them,</c><00:03:56.560><c> it</c>

00:03:56.710 --> 00:03:56.720 align:start position:0%
in the state's case against them, it
 

00:03:56.720 --> 00:03:58.870 align:start position:0%
in the state's case against them, it
will<00:03:56.840><c> be</c><00:03:56.960><c> the</c><00:03:57.040><c> prosecutor</c><00:03:57.800><c> poking</c><00:03:58.240><c> holes</c><00:03:58.760><c> in</c>

00:03:58.870 --> 00:03:58.880 align:start position:0%
will be the prosecutor poking holes in
 

00:03:58.880 --> 00:04:00.710 align:start position:0%
will be the prosecutor poking holes in
the<00:03:58.960><c> defendant's</c><00:03:59.520><c> alibi.</c><00:04:00.200><c> On</c><00:04:00.360><c> the</c><00:04:00.520><c> other</c>

00:04:00.710 --> 00:04:00.720 align:start position:0%
the defendant's alibi. On the other
 

00:04:00.720 --> 00:04:02.430 align:start position:0%
the defendant's alibi. On the other
hand,<00:04:01.120><c> the</c><00:04:01.240><c> New</c><00:04:01.400><c> Jersey</c><00:04:01.680><c> Supreme</c><00:04:02.000><c> Court</c><00:04:02.240><c> has</c>

00:04:02.430 --> 00:04:02.440 align:start position:0%
hand, the New Jersey Supreme Court has
 

00:04:02.440 --> 00:04:03.910 align:start position:0%
hand, the New Jersey Supreme Court has
said<00:04:02.640><c> that,</c><00:04:02.840><c> quote,</c><00:04:03.160><c> "Few</c><00:04:03.360><c> defenses</c><00:04:03.800><c> have</c>

00:04:03.910 --> 00:04:03.920 align:start position:0%
said that, quote, "Few defenses have
 

00:04:03.920 --> 00:04:05.030 align:start position:0%
said that, quote, "Few defenses have
greater<00:04:04.200><c> potential</c><00:04:04.560><c> for</c><00:04:04.680><c> creating</c>

00:04:05.030 --> 00:04:05.040 align:start position:0%
greater potential for creating
 

00:04:05.040 --> 00:04:06.270 align:start position:0%
greater potential for creating
reasonable<00:04:05.400><c> doubt</c><00:04:05.640><c> as</c><00:04:05.760><c> to</c><00:04:05.880><c> a</c><00:04:05.920><c> defendant's</c>

00:04:06.270 --> 00:04:06.280 align:start position:0%
reasonable doubt as to a defendant's
 

00:04:06.280 --> 00:04:08.510 align:start position:0%
reasonable doubt as to a defendant's
guilt<00:04:06.520><c> in</c><00:04:06.600><c> the</c><00:04:06.680><c> minds</c><00:04:07.040><c> of</c><00:04:07.160><c> the</c><00:04:07.280><c> jurors</c><00:04:08.200><c> than</c><00:04:08.400><c> an</c>

00:04:08.510 --> 00:04:08.520 align:start position:0%
guilt in the minds of the jurors than an
 

00:04:08.520 --> 00:04:10.590 align:start position:0%
guilt in the minds of the jurors than an
alibi."<00:04:09.120><c> But</c><00:04:09.280><c> is</c><00:04:09.400><c> alibi</c><00:04:09.800><c> really</c><00:04:10.120><c> a</c><00:04:10.200><c> powerful</c>

00:04:10.590 --> 00:04:10.600 align:start position:0%
alibi." But is alibi really a powerful
 

00:04:10.600 --> 00:04:12.990 align:start position:0%
alibi." But is alibi really a powerful
defense<00:04:11.200><c> or</c><00:04:11.480><c> a</c><00:04:11.600><c> risky</c><00:04:12.000><c> gambit</c><00:04:12.520><c> with</c><00:04:12.680><c> a</c><00:04:12.800><c> high</c>

00:04:12.990 --> 00:04:13.000 align:start position:0%
defense or a risky gambit with a high
 

00:04:13.000 --> 00:04:14.830 align:start position:0%
defense or a risky gambit with a high
likelihood<00:04:13.560><c> of</c><00:04:13.680><c> backfiring?</c><00:04:14.520><c> Courts</c><00:04:14.760><c> and</c>

00:04:14.830 --> 00:04:14.840 align:start position:0%
likelihood of backfiring? Courts and
 

00:04:14.840 --> 00:04:16.990 align:start position:0%
likelihood of backfiring? Courts and
prosecutors<00:04:15.480><c> often</c><00:04:15.880><c> contend</c><00:04:16.400><c> that</c><00:04:16.560><c> alibis</c>

00:04:16.990 --> 00:04:17.000 align:start position:0%
prosecutors often contend that alibis
 

00:04:17.000 --> 00:04:19.430 align:start position:0%
prosecutors often contend that alibis
are<00:04:17.200><c> easy</c><00:04:17.560><c> to</c><00:04:17.680><c> manufacture</c><00:04:18.600><c> and</c><00:04:18.880><c> effective</c>

00:04:19.430 --> 00:04:19.440 align:start position:0%
are easy to manufacture and effective
 

00:04:19.440 --> 00:04:21.990 align:start position:0%
are easy to manufacture and effective
defenses.<00:04:20.320><c> Alibi,</c><00:04:20.920><c> some</c><00:04:21.160><c> courts</c><00:04:21.400><c> suggest,</c>

00:04:21.990 --> 00:04:22.000 align:start position:0%
defenses. Alibi, some courts suggest,
 

00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:23.710 align:start position:0%
defenses. Alibi, some courts suggest,
quote,<00:04:22.360><c> "Has</c><00:04:22.560><c> long</c><00:04:22.800><c> been</c><00:04:22.960><c> considered</c><00:04:23.440><c> as</c><00:04:23.600><c> one</c>

00:04:23.710 --> 00:04:23.720 align:start position:0%
quote, "Has long been considered as one
 

00:04:23.720 --> 00:04:26.230 align:start position:0%
quote, "Has long been considered as one
of<00:04:23.800><c> the</c><00:04:23.919><c> main</c><00:04:24.400><c> avenues</c><00:04:25.080><c> of</c><00:04:25.240><c> escape</c><00:04:25.960><c> of</c><00:04:26.120><c> the</c>

00:04:26.230 --> 00:04:26.240 align:start position:0%
of the main avenues of escape of the
 

00:04:26.240 --> 00:04:28.390 align:start position:0%
of the main avenues of escape of the
guilty."<00:04:26.880><c> Other</c><00:04:27.080><c> courts</c><00:04:27.360><c> refer</c><00:04:27.600><c> to</c><00:04:27.760><c> it</c><00:04:27.880><c> as</c><00:04:28.120><c> a,</c>

00:04:28.390 --> 00:04:28.400 align:start position:0%
guilty." Other courts refer to it as a,
 

00:04:28.400 --> 00:04:30.830 align:start position:0%
guilty." Other courts refer to it as a,
quote,<00:04:28.800><c> "Hip</c><00:04:29.200><c> pocket</c><00:04:29.760><c> defense."</c><00:04:30.400><c> because</c><00:04:30.720><c> of</c>

00:04:30.830 --> 00:04:30.840 align:start position:0%
quote, "Hip pocket defense." because of
 

00:04:30.840 --> 00:04:32.190 align:start position:0%
quote, "Hip pocket defense." because of
the<00:04:31.080><c> ease</c><00:04:31.560><c> with</c><00:04:31.720><c> which</c><00:04:31.880><c> it</c><00:04:31.960><c> can</c><00:04:32.080><c> be</c>

00:04:32.190 --> 00:04:32.200 align:start position:0%
the ease with which it can be
 

00:04:32.200 --> 00:04:34.190 align:start position:0%
the ease with which it can be
manufactured<00:04:33.000><c> for</c><00:04:33.200><c> introduction</c><00:04:33.919><c> in</c><00:04:34.040><c> the</c>

00:04:34.190 --> 00:04:34.200 align:start position:0%
manufactured for introduction in the
 

00:04:34.200 --> 00:04:36.590 align:start position:0%
manufactured for introduction in the
final<00:04:34.600><c> hours</c><00:04:34.919><c> of</c><00:04:35.040><c> the</c><00:04:35.160><c> trial.</c><00:04:35.720><c> But</c><00:04:35.880><c> concerns</c>

00:04:36.590 --> 00:04:36.600 align:start position:0%
final hours of the trial. But concerns
 

00:04:36.600 --> 00:04:38.630 align:start position:0%
final hours of the trial. But concerns
about<00:04:36.919><c> this</c><00:04:37.080><c> alleged</c><00:04:37.520><c> easy</c><00:04:37.760><c> fabrication</c><00:04:38.440><c> have</c>

00:04:38.630 --> 00:04:38.640 align:start position:0%
about this alleged easy fabrication have
 

00:04:38.640 --> 00:04:40.750 align:start position:0%
about this alleged easy fabrication have
mostly<00:04:39.000><c> been</c><00:04:39.120><c> done</c><00:04:39.280><c> away</c><00:04:39.600><c> with</c><00:04:40.000><c> with</c><00:04:40.360><c> notice</c>

00:04:40.750 --> 00:04:40.760 align:start position:0%
mostly been done away with with notice
 

00:04:40.760 --> 00:04:43.070 align:start position:0%
mostly been done away with with notice
of<00:04:40.919><c> alibi</c><00:04:41.400><c> rules</c><00:04:42.080><c> such</c><00:04:42.320><c> as</c><00:04:42.480><c> Federal</c><00:04:42.840><c> Rule</c><00:04:43.000><c> of</c>

00:04:43.070 --> 00:04:43.080 align:start position:0%
of alibi rules such as Federal Rule of
 

00:04:43.080 --> 00:04:46.990 align:start position:0%
of alibi rules such as Federal Rule of
Criminal<00:04:43.440><c> Procedure</c><00:04:44.280><c> 12.1</c><00:04:45.600><c> that</c><00:04:46.080><c> is</c><00:04:46.320><c> found,</c>

00:04:46.990 --> 00:04:47.000 align:start position:0%
Criminal Procedure 12.1 that is found,
 

00:04:47.000 --> 00:04:49.070 align:start position:0%
Criminal Procedure 12.1 that is found,
likewise,<00:04:47.560><c> in</c><00:04:47.760><c> many</c><00:04:48.040><c> jurisdictions,</c><00:04:48.880><c> not</c>

00:04:49.070 --> 00:04:49.080 align:start position:0%
likewise, in many jurisdictions, not
 

00:04:49.080 --> 00:04:50.870 align:start position:0%
likewise, in many jurisdictions, not
just<00:04:49.320><c> in</c><00:04:49.400><c> federal</c><00:04:49.720><c> courts.</c><00:04:50.320><c> Defendants</c><00:04:50.760><c> can</c>

00:04:50.870 --> 00:04:50.880 align:start position:0%
just in federal courts. Defendants can
 

00:04:50.880 --> 00:04:53.550 align:start position:0%
just in federal courts. Defendants can
no<00:04:51.040><c> longer</c><00:04:51.400><c> provide</c><00:04:52.040><c> an</c><00:04:52.200><c> alibi</c><00:04:52.960><c> on</c><00:04:53.240><c> the</c><00:04:53.320><c> very</c>

00:04:53.550 --> 00:04:53.560 align:start position:0%
no longer provide an alibi on the very
 

00:04:53.560 --> 00:04:55.190 align:start position:0%
no longer provide an alibi on the very
last<00:04:53.800><c> day</c><00:04:53.880><c> of</c><00:04:54.000><c> trial</c><00:04:54.520><c> and</c><00:04:54.640><c> essentially</c><00:04:55.000><c> allow</c>

00:04:55.190 --> 00:04:55.200 align:start position:0%
last day of trial and essentially allow
 

00:04:55.200 --> 00:04:56.830 align:start position:0%
last day of trial and essentially allow
prosecutors<00:04:55.760><c> to</c><00:04:55.880><c> gather</c><00:04:56.200><c> evidence</c><00:04:56.640><c> to</c>

00:04:56.830 --> 00:04:56.840 align:start position:0%
prosecutors to gather evidence to
 

00:04:56.840 --> 00:04:59.430 align:start position:0%
prosecutors to gather evidence to
discredit<00:04:57.400><c> it.</c><00:04:57.800><c> So,</c><00:04:58.080><c> which</c><00:04:58.280><c> is</c><00:04:58.400><c> correct?</c><00:04:59.280><c> Is</c>

00:04:59.430 --> 00:04:59.440 align:start position:0%
discredit it. So, which is correct? Is
 

00:04:59.440 --> 00:05:01.030 align:start position:0%
discredit it. So, which is correct? Is
an<00:04:59.560><c> alibi</c><00:04:59.840><c> defense</c><00:05:00.320><c> the</c><00:05:00.440><c> key</c><00:05:00.800><c> to</c><00:05:00.960><c> the</c>

00:05:01.030 --> 00:05:01.040 align:start position:0%
an alibi defense the key to the
 

00:05:01.040 --> 00:05:04.630 align:start position:0%
an alibi defense the key to the
jailhouse<00:05:01.520><c> door</c><00:05:02.320><c> or</c><00:05:02.880><c> a</c><00:05:03.040><c> milestone</c><00:05:04.080><c> around</c><00:05:04.600><c> a</c>

00:05:04.630 --> 00:05:04.640 align:start position:0%
jailhouse door or a milestone around a
 

00:05:04.640 --> 00:05:07.830 align:start position:0%
jailhouse door or a milestone around a
defendant's<00:05:05.200><c> neck?</c><00:05:06.160><c> Quote,</c><00:05:06.919><c> "Alibis</c><00:05:07.560><c> always</c>

00:05:07.830 --> 00:05:07.840 align:start position:0%
defendant's neck? Quote, "Alibis always
 

00:05:07.840 --> 00:05:09.670 align:start position:0%
defendant's neck? Quote, "Alibis always
sound<00:05:08.160><c> so</c><00:05:08.280><c> delightfully</c><00:05:08.760><c> healthy,</c><00:05:09.400><c> but</c><00:05:09.560><c> they</c>

00:05:09.670 --> 00:05:09.680 align:start position:0%
sound so delightfully healthy, but they
 

00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:12.110 align:start position:0%
sound so delightfully healthy, but they
crack<00:05:10.040><c> up</c><00:05:10.320><c> dreadfully</c><00:05:10.800><c> easily.</c><00:05:11.440><c> I'm</c><00:05:11.600><c> not</c><00:05:11.840><c> sure</c>

00:05:12.110 --> 00:05:12.120 align:start position:0%
crack up dreadfully easily. I'm not sure
 

00:05:12.120 --> 00:05:14.550 align:start position:0%
crack up dreadfully easily. I'm not sure
that<00:05:12.320><c> I</c><00:05:12.400><c> like</c><00:05:12.960><c> cast-iron</c><00:05:13.520><c> alibis.</c><00:05:14.360><c> They're</c>

00:05:14.550 --> 00:05:14.560 align:start position:0%
that I like cast-iron alibis. They're
 

00:05:14.560 --> 00:05:16.590 align:start position:0%
that I like cast-iron alibis. They're
the<00:05:14.640><c> sort</c><00:05:15.000><c> that</c><00:05:15.160><c> sink</c><00:05:15.400><c> quickest</c><00:05:16.360><c> to</c><00:05:16.480><c> the</c>

00:05:16.590 --> 00:05:16.600 align:start position:0%
the sort that sink quickest to the
 

00:05:16.600 --> 00:05:20.110 align:start position:0%
the sort that sink quickest to the
bottom<00:05:17.200><c> of</c><00:05:17.360><c> the</c><00:05:17.440><c> sea."</c>

00:05:20.110 --> 00:05:20.120 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:05:20.120 --> 00:05:21.909 align:start position:0%
 
I<00:05:20.240><c> have</c><00:05:20.400><c> had</c><00:05:20.600><c> terrible</c><00:05:21.000><c> eyesight</c><00:05:21.440><c> since</c><00:05:21.680><c> I</c><00:05:21.760><c> was</c>

00:05:21.909 --> 00:05:21.919 align:start position:0%
I have had terrible eyesight since I was
 

00:05:21.919 --> 00:05:23.710 align:start position:0%
I have had terrible eyesight since I was
a<00:05:21.960><c> kid,</c><00:05:22.560><c> and</c><00:05:22.880><c> for</c><00:05:22.960><c> those</c><00:05:23.160><c> of</c><00:05:23.280><c> us</c><00:05:23.400><c> who</c><00:05:23.520><c> had</c><00:05:23.640><c> to</c>

00:05:23.710 --> 00:05:23.720 align:start position:0%
a kid, and for those of us who had to
 

00:05:23.720 --> 00:05:26.110 align:start position:0%
a kid, and for those of us who had to
get<00:05:23.840><c> glasses</c><00:05:24.240><c> at</c><00:05:24.400><c> a</c><00:05:24.480><c> very</c><00:05:24.919><c> young</c><00:05:25.320><c> age,</c><00:05:25.960><c> you</c>

00:05:26.110 --> 00:05:26.120 align:start position:0%
get glasses at a very young age, you
 

00:05:26.120 --> 00:05:27.590 align:start position:0%
get glasses at a very young age, you
probably<00:05:26.480><c> still</c><00:05:26.760><c> hold</c><00:05:27.000><c> on</c><00:05:27.360><c> to</c><00:05:27.480><c> the</c><00:05:27.503><c> [music]</c>

00:05:27.590 --> 00:05:27.600 align:start position:0%
probably still hold on to the [music]
 

00:05:27.600 --> 00:05:30.070 align:start position:0%
probably still hold on to the [music]
same<00:05:27.919><c> crooked,</c><00:05:28.720><c> scratched,</c><00:05:29.400><c> hanging</c><00:05:29.760><c> by</c><00:05:29.960><c> a</c>

00:05:30.070 --> 00:05:30.080 align:start position:0%
same crooked, scratched, hanging by a
 

00:05:30.080 --> 00:05:31.909 align:start position:0%
same crooked, scratched, hanging by a
thread<00:05:30.520><c> pair</c><00:05:30.760><c> you've</c><00:05:30.960><c> had</c><00:05:31.160><c> for</c><00:05:31.320><c> years.</c>

00:05:31.909 --> 00:05:31.919 align:start position:0%
thread pair you've had for years.
 

00:05:31.919 --> 00:05:33.870 align:start position:0%
thread pair you've had for years.
Because<00:05:32.160><c> getting</c><00:05:32.400><c> new</c><00:05:32.560><c> glasses</c><00:05:33.080><c> has</c><00:05:33.320><c> always</c>

00:05:33.870 --> 00:05:33.880 align:start position:0%
Because getting new glasses has always
 

00:05:33.880 --> 00:05:35.630 align:start position:0%
Because getting new glasses has always
been<00:05:34.120><c> a</c><00:05:34.200><c> time-consuming,</c><00:05:35.080><c> expensive</c>

00:05:35.630 --> 00:05:35.640 align:start position:0%
been a time-consuming, expensive
 

00:05:35.640 --> 00:05:37.830 align:start position:0%
been a time-consuming, expensive
activity<00:05:36.200><c> you</c><00:05:36.400><c> couldn't</c><00:05:36.680><c> justify</c><00:05:37.280><c> until</c><00:05:37.640><c> your</c>

00:05:37.830 --> 00:05:37.840 align:start position:0%
activity you couldn't justify until your
 

00:05:37.840 --> 00:05:39.950 align:start position:0%
activity you couldn't justify until your
old<00:05:38.040><c> ones</c><00:05:38.400><c> were</c><00:05:38.638><c> [music]</c><00:05:38.680><c> beyond</c><00:05:39.160><c> repair.</c><00:05:39.760><c> But</c>

00:05:39.950 --> 00:05:39.960 align:start position:0%
old ones were [music] beyond repair. But
 

00:05:39.960 --> 00:05:42.510 align:start position:0%
old ones were [music] beyond repair. But
not<00:05:40.440><c> anymore.</c><00:05:41.120><c> Zenni</c><00:05:41.400><c> Optical</c><00:05:41.880><c> has</c><00:05:42.040><c> saved</c><00:05:42.280><c> my</c>

00:05:42.510 --> 00:05:42.520 align:start position:0%
not anymore. Zenni Optical has saved my
 

00:05:42.520 --> 00:05:44.190 align:start position:0%
not anymore. Zenni Optical has saved my
eyes,<00:05:43.000><c> my</c><00:05:43.160><c> wallet,</c><00:05:43.640><c> and</c><00:05:43.878><c> [music]</c><00:05:44.000><c> my</c>

00:05:44.190 --> 00:05:44.200 align:start position:0%
eyes, my wallet, and [music] my
 

00:05:44.200 --> 00:05:47.710 align:start position:0%
eyes, my wallet, and [music] my
schedule.<00:05:44.840><c> My</c><00:05:45.040><c> old</c><00:05:45.200><c> glasses</c><00:05:45.640><c> cost</c><00:05:45.960><c> me</c><00:05:46.160><c> $167</c>

00:05:47.710 --> 00:05:47.720 align:start position:0%
schedule. My old glasses cost me $167
 

00:05:47.720 --> 00:05:50.230 align:start position:0%
schedule. My old glasses cost me $167
with<00:05:48.120><c> insurance.</c><00:05:48.960><c> At</c><00:05:49.240><c> Zenni,</c><00:05:49.640><c> these</c><00:05:49.920><c> frames</c>

00:05:50.230 --> 00:05:50.240 align:start position:0%
with insurance. At Zenni, these frames
 

00:05:50.240 --> 00:05:52.310 align:start position:0%
with insurance. At Zenni, these frames
I'm<00:05:50.400><c> wearing</c><00:05:50.680><c> right</c><00:05:50.920><c> now,</c><00:05:51.240><c> I</c><00:05:51.320><c> kid</c><00:05:51.560><c> you</c><00:05:51.680><c> not,</c>

00:05:52.310 --> 00:05:52.320 align:start position:0%
I'm wearing right now, I kid you not,
 

00:05:52.320 --> 00:05:55.190 align:start position:0%
I'm wearing right now, I kid you not,
were<00:05:52.520><c> $15.</c><00:05:53.800><c> Zenni</c><00:05:54.280><c> is</c><00:05:54.480><c> an</c><00:05:54.600><c> online</c><00:05:54.920><c> eyewear</c>

00:05:55.190 --> 00:05:55.200 align:start position:0%
were $15. Zenni is an online eyewear
 

00:05:55.200 --> 00:05:57.150 align:start position:0%
were $15. Zenni is an online eyewear
shop,<00:05:55.640><c> prescription</c><00:05:56.120><c> glasses,</c><00:05:56.560><c> sunglasses,</c>

00:05:57.150 --> 00:05:57.160 align:start position:0%
shop, prescription glasses, sunglasses,
 

00:05:57.160 --> 00:06:00.230 align:start position:0%
shop, prescription glasses, sunglasses,
blue<00:05:57.360><c> light</c><00:05:57.560><c> lenses</c><00:05:58.280><c> starting</c><00:05:58.640><c> at</c><00:05:58.800><c> under</c><00:05:59.240><c> $30.</c>

00:06:00.230 --> 00:06:00.240 align:start position:0%
blue light lenses starting at under $30.
 

00:06:00.240 --> 00:06:02.390 align:start position:0%
blue light lenses starting at under $30.
You<00:06:00.320><c> go</c><00:06:00.440><c> to</c><00:06:00.520><c> zenni.com,</c><00:06:01.560><c> pick</c><00:06:01.800><c> a</c><00:06:01.840><c> frame,</c>

00:06:02.390 --> 00:06:02.400 align:start position:0%
You go to zenni.com, pick a frame,
 

00:06:02.400 --> 00:06:03.830 align:start position:0%
You go to zenni.com, pick a frame,
upload<00:06:02.680><c> your</c><00:06:02.800><c> prescription,</c><00:06:03.320><c> and</c><00:06:03.440><c> they</c><00:06:03.560><c> ship</c>

00:06:03.830 --> 00:06:03.840 align:start position:0%
upload your prescription, and they ship
 

00:06:03.840 --> 00:06:06.870 align:start position:0%
upload your prescription, and they ship
it<00:06:04.040><c> to</c><00:06:04.240><c> your</c><00:06:04.400><c> door.</c><00:06:05.000><c> You</c><00:06:05.120><c> can</c><00:06:05.320><c> easily</c><00:06:05.960><c> also</c><00:06:06.640><c> add</c>

00:06:06.870 --> 00:06:06.880 align:start position:0%
it to your door. You can easily also add
 

00:06:06.880 --> 00:06:08.630 align:start position:0%
it to your door. You can easily also add
on<00:06:07.120><c> protective</c><00:06:07.560><c> coatings</c><00:06:07.960><c> to</c><00:06:08.080><c> your</c><00:06:08.200><c> lenses</c>

00:06:08.630 --> 00:06:08.640 align:start position:0%
on protective coatings to your lenses
 

00:06:08.640 --> 00:06:10.470 align:start position:0%
on protective coatings to your lenses
like<00:06:08.840><c> blue</c><00:06:09.000><c> light</c><00:06:09.240><c> filtering,</c><00:06:09.760><c> anti-fog,</c>

00:06:10.470 --> 00:06:10.480 align:start position:0%
like blue light filtering, anti-fog,
 

00:06:10.480 --> 00:06:12.150 align:start position:0%
like blue light filtering, anti-fog,
water<00:06:10.680><c> resistant,</c><00:06:11.200><c> impact</c><00:06:11.600><c> resistant,</c>

00:06:12.150 --> 00:06:12.160 align:start position:0%
water resistant, impact resistant,
 

00:06:12.160 --> 00:06:13.910 align:start position:0%
water resistant, impact resistant,
transitions<00:06:12.800><c> lenses,</c><00:06:13.240><c> lenses</c><00:06:13.600><c> for</c><00:06:13.720><c> night</c>

00:06:13.910 --> 00:06:13.920 align:start position:0%
transitions lenses, lenses for night
 

00:06:13.920 --> 00:06:16.270 align:start position:0%
transitions lenses, lenses for night
driving,<00:06:14.360><c> and</c><00:06:15.040><c> more.</c><00:06:15.400><c> And</c><00:06:15.600><c> at</c><00:06:15.720><c> that</c><00:06:15.920><c> price,</c>

00:06:16.270 --> 00:06:16.280 align:start position:0%
driving, and more. And at that price,
 

00:06:16.280 --> 00:06:18.230 align:start position:0%
driving, and more. And at that price,
something<00:06:16.800><c> kind</c><00:06:17.040><c> of</c><00:06:17.160><c> shifts.</c><00:06:17.800><c> You</c><00:06:17.960><c> stop</c>

00:06:18.230 --> 00:06:18.240 align:start position:0%
something kind of shifts. You stop
 

00:06:18.240 --> 00:06:20.430 align:start position:0%
something kind of shifts. You stop
asking,<00:06:18.680><c> "Do</c><00:06:18.840><c> I</c><00:06:18.919><c> really</c><00:06:19.200><c> need</c><00:06:19.600><c> new</c><00:06:19.800><c> glasses?"</c>

00:06:20.430 --> 00:06:20.440 align:start position:0%
asking, "Do I really need new glasses?"
 

00:06:20.440 --> 00:06:22.510 align:start position:0%
asking, "Do I really need new glasses?"
and<00:06:20.600><c> start</c><00:06:20.840><c> asking,</c><00:06:21.280><c> "Why</c><00:06:21.520><c> wouldn't</c><00:06:22.160><c> I</c><00:06:22.240><c> just</c>

00:06:22.510 --> 00:06:22.520 align:start position:0%
and start asking, "Why wouldn't I just
 

00:06:22.520 --> 00:06:24.670 align:start position:0%
and start asking, "Why wouldn't I just
get<00:06:22.720><c> them?"</c><00:06:23.160><c> You</c><00:06:23.280><c> are</c><00:06:23.400><c> not</c><00:06:23.600><c> agonizing</c><00:06:24.400><c> over</c>

00:06:24.670 --> 00:06:24.680 align:start position:0%
get them?" You are not agonizing over
 

00:06:24.680 --> 00:06:26.430 align:start position:0%
get them?" You are not agonizing over
one<00:06:24.919><c> pair</c><00:06:25.160><c> that</c><00:06:25.280><c> has</c><00:06:25.440><c> to</c><00:06:25.560><c> do</c><00:06:25.720><c> everything</c><00:06:26.360><c> for</c>

00:06:26.430 --> 00:06:26.440 align:start position:0%
one pair that has to do everything for
 

00:06:26.440 --> 00:06:28.390 align:start position:0%
one pair that has to do everything for
the<00:06:26.520><c> next</c><00:06:26.840><c> 2</c><00:06:27.000><c> years.</c><00:06:27.440><c> Get</c><00:06:27.600><c> the</c><00:06:27.680><c> ones</c><00:06:27.960><c> for</c><00:06:28.080><c> work,</c>

00:06:28.390 --> 00:06:28.400 align:start position:0%
the next 2 years. Get the ones for work,
 

00:06:28.400 --> 00:06:30.310 align:start position:0%
the next 2 years. Get the ones for work,
get<00:06:28.560><c> the</c><00:06:28.680><c> fun</c><00:06:29.080><c> ones,</c><00:06:29.520><c> get</c><00:06:29.680><c> the</c><00:06:29.760><c> pair</c><00:06:30.000><c> that</c><00:06:30.120><c> only</c>

00:06:30.310 --> 00:06:30.320 align:start position:0%
get the fun ones, get the pair that only
 

00:06:30.320 --> 00:06:33.230 align:start position:0%
get the fun ones, get the pair that only
matches<00:06:30.760><c> one</c><00:06:31.200><c> outfit.</c><00:06:32.040><c> At</c><00:06:32.240><c> under</c><00:06:32.440><c> $30,</c><00:06:33.120><c> you</c>

00:06:33.230 --> 00:06:33.240 align:start position:0%
matches one outfit. At under $30, you
 

00:06:33.240 --> 00:06:35.950 align:start position:0%
matches one outfit. At under $30, you
don't<00:06:33.720><c> have</c><00:06:33.880><c> to</c><00:06:34.000><c> justify</c><00:06:34.520><c> it.</c><00:06:34.680><c> Over</c><00:06:34.880><c> 150,000</c>

00:06:35.950 --> 00:06:35.960 align:start position:0%
don't have to justify it. Over 150,000
 

00:06:35.960 --> 00:06:37.909 align:start position:0%
don't have to justify it. Over 150,000
five-star<00:06:36.400><c> reviews,</c><00:06:37.040><c> and</c><00:06:37.280><c> if</c><00:06:37.400><c> you've</c><00:06:37.640><c> never</c>

00:06:37.909 --> 00:06:37.919 align:start position:0%
five-star reviews, and if you've never
 

00:06:37.919 --> 00:06:39.710 align:start position:0%
five-star reviews, and if you've never
bought<00:06:38.120><c> glasses</c><00:06:38.480><c> online</c><00:06:38.800><c> before,</c><00:06:39.320><c> Zenni</c><00:06:39.520><c> has</c>

00:06:39.710 --> 00:06:39.720 align:start position:0%
bought glasses online before, Zenni has
 

00:06:39.720 --> 00:06:42.670 align:start position:0%
bought glasses online before, Zenni has
a<00:06:39.800><c> virtual</c><00:06:40.480><c> try-on,</c><00:06:41.280><c> so</c><00:06:41.480><c> you</c><00:06:41.600><c> can</c><00:06:41.840><c> exactly</c><00:06:42.440><c> see</c>

00:06:42.670 --> 00:06:42.680 align:start position:0%
a virtual try-on, so you can exactly see
 

00:06:42.680 --> 00:06:44.190 align:start position:0%
a virtual try-on, so you can exactly see
how<00:06:42.800><c> a</c><00:06:42.880><c> frame</c><00:06:43.120><c> looks</c><00:06:43.320><c> on</c><00:06:43.440><c> your</c><00:06:43.560><c> face</c><00:06:43.880><c> before</c>

00:06:44.190 --> 00:06:44.200 align:start position:0%
how a frame looks on your face before
 

00:06:44.200 --> 00:06:46.110 align:start position:0%
how a frame looks on your face before
you<00:06:44.280><c> commit.</c><00:06:44.919><c> As</c><00:06:45.040><c> you</c><00:06:45.120><c> can</c><00:06:45.240><c> see,</c><00:06:45.560><c> I</c><00:06:45.640><c> got</c><00:06:45.840><c> these</c>

00:06:46.110 --> 00:06:46.120 align:start position:0%
you commit. As you can see, I got these
 

00:06:46.120 --> 00:06:48.350 align:start position:0%
you commit. As you can see, I got these
black<00:06:46.480><c> rectangle</c><00:06:46.919><c> frames,</c><00:06:47.320><c> which</c><00:06:47.680><c> I</c><00:06:47.800><c> love.</c>

00:06:48.350 --> 00:06:48.360 align:start position:0%
black rectangle frames, which I love.
 

00:06:48.360 --> 00:06:50.550 align:start position:0%
black rectangle frames, which I love.
They<00:06:48.520><c> are</c><00:06:48.680><c> so</c><00:06:49.000><c> comfortable</c><00:06:49.680><c> and</c><00:06:49.960><c> durable.</c><00:06:50.480><c> I</c>

00:06:50.550 --> 00:06:50.560 align:start position:0%
They are so comfortable and durable. I
 

00:06:50.560 --> 00:06:53.030 align:start position:0%
They are so comfortable and durable. I
also<00:06:50.840><c> love</c><00:06:51.520><c> that</c><00:06:51.640><c> almost</c><00:06:52.040><c> every</c><00:06:52.400><c> frame</c><00:06:52.800><c> on</c>

00:06:53.030 --> 00:06:53.040 align:start position:0%
also love that almost every frame on
 

00:06:53.040 --> 00:06:56.470 align:start position:0%
also love that almost every frame on
Zenni<00:06:53.480><c> has</c><00:06:53.840><c> so</c><00:06:54.240><c> many</c><00:06:54.760><c> real,</c><00:06:55.480><c> honest</c><00:06:56.000><c> customer</c>

00:06:56.470 --> 00:06:56.480 align:start position:0%
Zenni has so many real, honest customer
 

00:06:56.480 --> 00:06:58.870 align:start position:0%
Zenni has so many real, honest customer
reviews<00:06:57.280><c> with</c><00:06:57.680><c> photos</c><00:06:58.200><c> that</c><00:06:58.320><c> customers</c><00:06:58.720><c> have</c>

00:06:58.870 --> 00:06:58.880 align:start position:0%
reviews with photos that customers have
 

00:06:58.880 --> 00:07:00.830 align:start position:0%
reviews with photos that customers have
uploaded<00:06:59.280><c> themselves</c><00:07:00.120><c> of</c><00:07:00.320><c> them</c><00:07:00.560><c> wearing</c><00:07:00.760><c> the</c>

00:07:00.830 --> 00:07:00.840 align:start position:0%
uploaded themselves of them wearing the
 

00:07:00.840 --> 00:07:02.870 align:start position:0%
uploaded themselves of them wearing the
glasses.<00:07:01.440><c> That</c><00:07:01.640><c> is</c><00:07:01.919><c> exactly</c><00:07:02.600><c> what</c><00:07:02.720><c> I've</c>

00:07:02.870 --> 00:07:02.880 align:start position:0%
glasses. That is exactly what I've
 

00:07:02.880 --> 00:07:04.909 align:start position:0%
glasses. That is exactly what I've
wanted<00:07:03.760><c> in</c><00:07:04.000><c> my</c><00:07:04.160><c> glasses</c><00:07:04.560><c> shopping</c>

00:07:04.909 --> 00:07:04.919 align:start position:0%
wanted in my glasses shopping
 

00:07:04.919 --> 00:07:07.670 align:start position:0%
wanted in my glasses shopping
experience,<00:07:05.600><c> and</c><00:07:06.080><c> it</c><00:07:06.200><c> was</c><00:07:06.400><c> so</c><00:07:06.640><c> fun</c><00:07:07.000><c> to</c><00:07:07.200><c> add</c><00:07:07.480><c> so</c>

00:07:07.670 --> 00:07:07.680 align:start position:0%
experience, and it was so fun to add so
 

00:07:07.680 --> 00:07:10.030 align:start position:0%
experience, and it was so fun to add so
many<00:07:07.880><c> to</c><00:07:07.960><c> my</c><00:07:08.120><c> cart</c><00:07:08.440><c> based</c><00:07:08.760><c> on</c><00:07:09.440><c> whose</c><00:07:09.800><c> face</c>

00:07:10.030 --> 00:07:10.040 align:start position:0%
many to my cart based on whose face
 

00:07:10.040 --> 00:07:11.790 align:start position:0%
many to my cart based on whose face
shape<00:07:10.440><c> looked</c><00:07:10.680><c> the</c><00:07:10.760><c> most</c><00:07:11.000><c> like</c><00:07:11.240><c> mine</c><00:07:11.560><c> in</c><00:07:11.680><c> the</c>

00:07:11.790 --> 00:07:11.800 align:start position:0%
shape looked the most like mine in the
 

00:07:11.800 --> 00:07:13.270 align:start position:0%
shape looked the most like mine in the
reviews.<00:07:12.320><c> I</c><00:07:12.400><c> thought,</c><00:07:12.680><c> "Well,</c><00:07:12.880><c> they</c><00:07:13.040><c> look</c>

00:07:13.270 --> 00:07:13.280 align:start position:0%
reviews. I thought, "Well, they look
 

00:07:13.280 --> 00:07:15.430 align:start position:0%
reviews. I thought, "Well, they look
fantastic<00:07:13.880><c> on</c><00:07:14.040><c> Janet,</c><00:07:14.440><c> so</c><00:07:15.080><c> maybe</c><00:07:15.280><c> they'll</c>

00:07:15.430 --> 00:07:15.440 align:start position:0%
fantastic on Janet, so maybe they'll
 

00:07:15.440 --> 00:07:16.830 align:start position:0%
fantastic on Janet, so maybe they'll
look<00:07:15.640><c> great</c><00:07:15.840><c> on</c><00:07:16.040><c> me."</c><00:07:16.280><c> The</c><00:07:16.360><c> transparent</c>

00:07:16.830 --> 00:07:16.840 align:start position:0%
look great on me." The transparent
 

00:07:16.840 --> 00:07:18.390 align:start position:0%
look great on me." The transparent
reviews<00:07:17.200><c> with</c><00:07:17.360><c> photos</c><00:07:17.720><c> means</c><00:07:18.000><c> I</c><00:07:18.080><c> could</c><00:07:18.240><c> feel</c>

00:07:18.390 --> 00:07:18.400 align:start position:0%
reviews with photos means I could feel
 

00:07:18.400 --> 00:07:20.550 align:start position:0%
reviews with photos means I could feel
confident<00:07:19.160><c> ordering</c><00:07:19.560><c> online</c><00:07:20.080><c> without</c>

00:07:20.550 --> 00:07:20.560 align:start position:0%
confident ordering online without
 

00:07:20.560 --> 00:07:22.510 align:start position:0%
confident ordering online without
wondering<00:07:21.040><c> if</c><00:07:21.160><c> my</c><00:07:21.320><c> face</c><00:07:21.640><c> shape</c><00:07:22.000><c> would</c><00:07:22.160><c> be</c><00:07:22.360><c> my</c>

00:07:22.510 --> 00:07:22.520 align:start position:0%
wondering if my face shape would be my
 

00:07:22.520 --> 00:07:24.390 align:start position:0%
wondering if my face shape would be my
downfall.<00:07:23.160><c> If</c><00:07:23.360><c> your</c><00:07:23.520><c> glasses</c><00:07:23.919><c> are</c><00:07:24.080><c> overdue</c>

00:07:24.390 --> 00:07:24.400 align:start position:0%
downfall. If your glasses are overdue
 

00:07:24.400 --> 00:07:26.670 align:start position:0%
downfall. If your glasses are overdue
for<00:07:24.600><c> a</c><00:07:24.680><c> refresh,</c><00:07:25.280><c> now</c><00:07:25.600><c> is</c><00:07:25.800><c> the</c><00:07:25.919><c> time.</c><00:07:26.400><c> Go</c><00:07:26.520><c> to</c>

00:07:26.670 --> 00:07:26.680 align:start position:0%
for a refresh, now is the time. Go to
 

00:07:26.680 --> 00:07:28.830 align:start position:0%
for a refresh, now is the time. Go to
zenni.com/podcast

00:07:28.830 --> 00:07:28.840 align:start position:0%
zenni.com/podcast
 

00:07:28.840 --> 00:07:32.190 align:start position:0%
zenni.com/podcast
and<00:07:29.000><c> use</c><00:07:29.200><c> podcast15</c><00:07:30.520><c> for</c><00:07:30.680><c> 15%</c><00:07:31.400><c> off</c><00:07:31.600><c> your</c><00:07:31.800><c> first</c>

00:07:32.190 --> 00:07:32.200 align:start position:0%
and use podcast15 for 15% off your first
 

00:07:32.200 --> 00:07:34.830 align:start position:0%
and use podcast15 for 15% off your first
order.<00:07:32.960><c> The</c><00:07:33.040><c> styles</c><00:07:33.440><c> sell</c><00:07:33.640><c> out,</c><00:07:34.040><c> so</c><00:07:34.360><c> don't</c><00:07:34.680><c> sit</c>

00:07:34.830 --> 00:07:34.840 align:start position:0%
order. The styles sell out, so don't sit
 

00:07:34.840 --> 00:07:38.710 align:start position:0%
order. The styles sell out, so don't sit
on<00:07:35.000><c> it.</c><00:07:35.160><c> That's</c><00:07:35.520><c> zenni.com/podcast,</c>

00:07:38.710 --> 00:07:38.720 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:07:38.720 --> 00:07:39.710 align:start position:0%
 
promo<00:07:39.040><c> code</c><00:07:39.160><c> [music]</c>

00:07:39.710 --> 00:07:39.720 align:start position:0%
promo code [music]
 

00:07:39.720 --> 00:07:44.390 align:start position:0%
promo code [music]
podcast15.<00:07:41.120><c> Now,</c><00:07:41.320><c> back</c><00:07:41.760><c> to</c><00:07:41.880><c> the</c><00:07:42.000><c> show.</c>

00:07:44.390 --> 00:07:44.400 align:start position:0%
podcast15. Now, back to the show.
 

00:07:44.400 --> 00:07:46.310 align:start position:0%
podcast15. Now, back to the show.
Defense<00:07:44.640><c> attorneys</c><00:07:45.120><c> frequently</c><00:07:45.560><c> decline</c><00:07:46.160><c> to</c>

00:07:46.310 --> 00:07:46.320 align:start position:0%
Defense attorneys frequently decline to
 

00:07:46.320 --> 00:07:48.230 align:start position:0%
Defense attorneys frequently decline to
offer<00:07:46.600><c> alibi</c><00:07:46.920><c> witnesses</c><00:07:47.440><c> out</c><00:07:47.560><c> of</c><00:07:47.680><c> concerns</c>

00:07:48.230 --> 00:07:48.240 align:start position:0%
offer alibi witnesses out of concerns
 

00:07:48.240 --> 00:07:49.830 align:start position:0%
offer alibi witnesses out of concerns
that<00:07:48.360><c> the</c><00:07:48.480><c> jury</c><00:07:48.840><c> will</c><00:07:48.960><c> reject</c><00:07:49.320><c> the</c><00:07:49.400><c> defense</c>

00:07:49.830 --> 00:07:49.840 align:start position:0%
that the jury will reject the defense
 

00:07:49.840 --> 00:07:50.990 align:start position:0%
that the jury will reject the defense
after<00:07:50.040><c> the</c><00:07:50.120><c> prosecutor's</c><00:07:50.640><c> clever</c>

00:07:50.990 --> 00:07:51.000 align:start position:0%
after the prosecutor's clever
 

00:07:51.000 --> 00:07:53.710 align:start position:0%
after the prosecutor's clever
cross-examination<00:07:52.080><c> and</c><00:07:52.320><c> summation,</c><00:07:53.240><c> leading</c>

00:07:53.710 --> 00:07:53.720 align:start position:0%
cross-examination and summation, leading
 

00:07:53.720 --> 00:07:55.430 align:start position:0%
cross-examination and summation, leading
to<00:07:53.840><c> the</c><00:07:53.920><c> defendant's</c><00:07:54.360><c> conviction.</c><00:07:55.040><c> Appellate</c>

00:07:55.430 --> 00:07:55.440 align:start position:0%
to the defendant's conviction. Appellate
 

00:07:55.440 --> 00:07:56.950 align:start position:0%
to the defendant's conviction. Appellate
dockets<00:07:55.920><c> frequently</c><00:07:56.560><c> contain</c>

00:07:56.950 --> 00:07:56.960 align:start position:0%
dockets frequently contain
 

00:07:56.960 --> 00:07:59.150 align:start position:0%
dockets frequently contain
post-conviction<00:07:57.640><c> cases</c><00:07:58.160><c> arguing</c><00:07:58.680><c> that</c><00:07:58.840><c> trial</c>

00:07:59.150 --> 00:07:59.160 align:start position:0%
post-conviction cases arguing that trial
 

00:07:59.160 --> 00:08:01.030 align:start position:0%
post-conviction cases arguing that trial
counsel<00:07:59.520><c> was</c><00:07:59.720><c> ineffective</c><00:08:00.600><c> for</c><00:08:00.760><c> not</c>

00:08:01.030 --> 00:08:01.040 align:start position:0%
counsel was ineffective for not
 

00:08:01.040 --> 00:08:03.270 align:start position:0%
counsel was ineffective for not
investigating<00:08:01.840><c> or</c><00:08:02.240><c> not</c><00:08:02.480><c> presenting</c><00:08:02.960><c> alibi</c>

00:08:03.270 --> 00:08:03.280 align:start position:0%
investigating or not presenting alibi
 

00:08:03.280 --> 00:08:05.550 align:start position:0%
investigating or not presenting alibi
witnesses.<00:08:04.080><c> These</c><00:08:04.320><c> claims,</c><00:08:04.800><c> however,</c><00:08:05.360><c> are</c>

00:08:05.550 --> 00:08:05.560 align:start position:0%
witnesses. These claims, however, are
 

00:08:05.560 --> 00:08:07.590 align:start position:0%
witnesses. These claims, however, are
rarely<00:08:05.960><c> successful.</c><00:08:06.760><c> In</c><00:08:06.920><c> Johnson</c><00:08:07.320><c> versus</c>

00:08:07.590 --> 00:08:07.600 align:start position:0%
rarely successful. In Johnson versus
 

00:08:07.600 --> 00:08:09.590 align:start position:0%
rarely successful. In Johnson versus
Commissioner,<00:08:08.360><c> a</c><00:08:08.480><c> Connecticut</c><00:08:09.040><c> case</c><00:08:09.400><c> from</c>

00:08:09.590 --> 00:08:09.600 align:start position:0%
Commissioner, a Connecticut case from
 

00:08:09.600 --> 00:08:11.990 align:start position:0%
Commissioner, a Connecticut case from
2019,<00:08:10.440><c> trial</c><00:08:10.720><c> counsel</c><00:08:11.040><c> said,</c><00:08:11.280><c> "Quote,</c><00:08:11.840><c> my</c>

00:08:11.990 --> 00:08:12.000 align:start position:0%
2019, trial counsel said, "Quote, my
 

00:08:12.000 --> 00:08:13.950 align:start position:0%
2019, trial counsel said, "Quote, my
belief<00:08:12.560><c> about</c><00:08:12.800><c> alibis</c><00:08:13.360><c> is</c><00:08:13.480><c> that</c><00:08:13.600><c> unless</c><00:08:13.840><c> they</c>

00:08:13.950 --> 00:08:13.960 align:start position:0%
belief about alibis is that unless they
 

00:08:13.960 --> 00:08:15.310 align:start position:0%
belief about alibis is that unless they
are<00:08:14.080><c> solid,</c><00:08:14.600><c> they</c><00:08:14.720><c> can</c><00:08:14.840><c> get</c><00:08:15.040><c> you</c><00:08:15.120><c> into</c>

00:08:15.310 --> 00:08:15.320 align:start position:0%
are solid, they can get you into
 

00:08:15.320 --> 00:08:17.270 align:start position:0%
are solid, they can get you into
trouble.<00:08:16.120><c> It's</c><00:08:16.280><c> the</c><00:08:16.360><c> last</c><00:08:16.720><c> thing</c><00:08:16.919><c> the</c><00:08:17.000><c> jury</c>

00:08:17.270 --> 00:08:17.280 align:start position:0%
trouble. It's the last thing the jury
 

00:08:17.280 --> 00:08:18.630 align:start position:0%
trouble. It's the last thing the jury
hears<00:08:17.560><c> if</c><00:08:17.680><c> you</c><00:08:17.760><c> have</c><00:08:17.840><c> a</c><00:08:17.919><c> good</c><00:08:18.080><c> prosecutor</c>

00:08:18.630 --> 00:08:18.640 align:start position:0%
hears if you have a good prosecutor
 

00:08:18.640 --> 00:08:20.550 align:start position:0%
hears if you have a good prosecutor
who's<00:08:18.800><c> a</c><00:08:18.840><c> good</c><00:08:19.080><c> cross-examiner</c><00:08:20.120><c> and</c><00:08:20.280><c> can</c><00:08:20.400><c> try</c>

00:08:20.550 --> 00:08:20.560 align:start position:0%
who's a good cross-examiner and can try
 

00:08:20.560 --> 00:08:22.830 align:start position:0%
who's a good cross-examiner and can try
to<00:08:20.720><c> kind</c><00:08:21.000><c> of</c><00:08:21.160><c> attack</c><00:08:21.880><c> either</c><00:08:22.120><c> a</c><00:08:22.160><c> family</c><00:08:22.520><c> member</c>

00:08:22.830 --> 00:08:22.840 align:start position:0%
to kind of attack either a family member
 

00:08:22.840 --> 00:08:24.990 align:start position:0%
to kind of attack either a family member
who's<00:08:23.040><c> an</c><00:08:23.160><c> alibi</c><00:08:23.520><c> witness</c><00:08:24.280><c> or</c><00:08:24.600><c> some</c><00:08:24.800><c> other</c>

00:08:24.990 --> 00:08:25.000 align:start position:0%
who's an alibi witness or some other
 

00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:27.790 align:start position:0%
who's an alibi witness or some other
vulnerability<00:08:25.760><c> to</c><00:08:25.880><c> the</c><00:08:26.040><c> alibi.</c><00:08:27.080><c> To</c><00:08:27.200><c> me,</c><00:08:27.680><c> it</c>

00:08:27.790 --> 00:08:27.800 align:start position:0%
vulnerability to the alibi. To me, it
 

00:08:27.800 --> 00:08:29.270 align:start position:0%
vulnerability to the alibi. To me, it
pulls<00:08:28.000><c> attention</c><00:08:28.360><c> away</c><00:08:28.520><c> from</c><00:08:28.680><c> the</c><00:08:28.760><c> weaknesses</c>

00:08:29.270 --> 00:08:29.280 align:start position:0%
pulls attention away from the weaknesses
 

00:08:29.280 --> 00:08:30.670 align:start position:0%
pulls attention away from the weaknesses
in<00:08:29.400><c> the</c><00:08:29.480><c> state's</c><00:08:29.800><c> case</c><00:08:30.200><c> and</c><00:08:30.320><c> it</c><00:08:30.440><c> kind</c><00:08:30.600><c> of</c>

00:08:30.670 --> 00:08:30.680 align:start position:0%
in the state's case and it kind of
 

00:08:30.680 --> 00:08:32.870 align:start position:0%
in the state's case and it kind of
develops<00:08:31.120><c> jurors'</c><00:08:31.480><c> focus</c><00:08:31.919><c> on</c><00:08:32.039><c> the</c><00:08:32.120><c> weaknesses</c>

00:08:32.870 --> 00:08:32.880 align:start position:0%
develops jurors' focus on the weaknesses
 

00:08:32.880 --> 00:08:34.830 align:start position:0%
develops jurors' focus on the weaknesses
in<00:08:33.000><c> the</c><00:08:33.120><c> alibi.</c><00:08:33.800><c> So,</c><00:08:34.280><c> it's</c><00:08:34.440><c> just</c><00:08:34.599><c> been</c><00:08:34.719><c> my</c>

00:08:34.830 --> 00:08:34.840 align:start position:0%
in the alibi. So, it's just been my
 

00:08:34.840 --> 00:08:37.029 align:start position:0%
in the alibi. So, it's just been my
practice<00:08:35.280><c> to</c><00:08:35.440><c> shy</c><00:08:35.640><c> away</c><00:08:36.000><c> from</c><00:08:36.240><c> alibis</c><00:08:36.760><c> unless</c>

00:08:37.029 --> 00:08:37.039 align:start position:0%
practice to shy away from alibis unless
 

00:08:37.039 --> 00:08:39.510 align:start position:0%
practice to shy away from alibis unless
they're<00:08:37.240><c> solid</c><00:08:37.880><c> and</c><00:08:38.360><c> I</c><00:08:38.440><c> had</c><00:08:38.599><c> some</c><00:08:38.760><c> concerns</c>

00:08:39.510 --> 00:08:39.520 align:start position:0%
they're solid and I had some concerns
 

00:08:39.520 --> 00:08:42.029 align:start position:0%
they're solid and I had some concerns
about<00:08:39.800><c> the</c><00:08:39.919><c> alibi</c><00:08:40.360><c> in</c><00:08:40.520><c> this</c><00:08:40.719><c> case.</c><00:08:41.400><c> Quote,</c>

00:08:42.029 --> 00:08:42.039 align:start position:0%
about the alibi in this case. Quote,
 

00:08:42.039 --> 00:08:44.150 align:start position:0%
about the alibi in this case. Quote,
there<00:08:42.240><c> is</c><00:08:42.400><c> nothing</c><00:08:43.000><c> as</c><00:08:43.240><c> dangerous</c><00:08:43.880><c> as</c><00:08:44.080><c> a</c>

00:08:44.150 --> 00:08:44.160 align:start position:0%
there is nothing as dangerous as a
 

00:08:44.160 --> 00:08:46.910 align:start position:0%
there is nothing as dangerous as a
poorly<00:08:44.560><c> investigated</c><00:08:45.240><c> alibi.</c><00:08:46.240><c> An</c><00:08:46.360><c> attorney</c>

00:08:46.910 --> 00:08:46.920 align:start position:0%
poorly investigated alibi. An attorney
 

00:08:46.920 --> 00:08:48.870 align:start position:0%
poorly investigated alibi. An attorney
who<00:08:47.080><c> is</c><00:08:47.200><c> not</c><00:08:47.440><c> thoroughly</c><00:08:47.839><c> prepared</c><00:08:48.520><c> does</c><00:08:48.760><c> a</c>

00:08:48.870 --> 00:08:48.880 align:start position:0%
who is not thoroughly prepared does a
 

00:08:48.880 --> 00:08:51.030 align:start position:0%
who is not thoroughly prepared does a
disservice<00:08:49.640><c> to</c><00:08:49.800><c> his</c><00:08:49.960><c> client</c><00:08:50.520><c> and</c><00:08:50.720><c> runs</c><00:08:50.960><c> the</c>

00:08:51.030 --> 00:08:51.040 align:start position:0%
disservice to his client and runs the
 

00:08:51.040 --> 00:08:53.590 align:start position:0%
disservice to his client and runs the
risk<00:08:51.400><c> of</c><00:08:51.520><c> having</c><00:08:51.760><c> his</c><00:08:51.880><c> client</c><00:08:52.160><c> convicted</c><00:08:53.000><c> even</c>

00:08:53.590 --> 00:08:53.600 align:start position:0%
risk of having his client convicted even
 

00:08:53.600 --> 00:08:55.829 align:start position:0%
risk of having his client convicted even
when<00:08:53.720><c> the</c><00:08:53.839><c> prosecution's</c><00:08:54.480><c> case</c><00:08:54.920><c> is</c><00:08:55.160><c> weak.</c><00:08:55.680><c> As</c>

00:08:55.829 --> 00:08:55.839 align:start position:0%
when the prosecution's case is weak. As
 

00:08:55.839 --> 00:08:59.750 align:start position:0%
when the prosecution's case is weak. As
I<00:08:55.960><c> said,</c><00:08:56.280><c> in</c><00:08:56.400><c> about</c><00:08:56.760><c> 2/3,</c><00:08:57.680><c> 68%</c><00:08:59.120><c> of</c><00:08:59.240><c> the</c><00:08:59.320><c> DNA</c>

00:08:59.750 --> 00:08:59.760 align:start position:0%
I said, in about 2/3, 68% of the DNA
 

00:08:59.760 --> 00:09:01.630 align:start position:0%
I said, in about 2/3, 68% of the DNA
exoneration<00:09:00.360><c> cases,</c><00:09:01.120><c> the</c><00:09:01.280><c> innocent</c>

00:09:01.630 --> 00:09:01.640 align:start position:0%
exoneration cases, the innocent
 

00:09:01.640 --> 00:09:03.350 align:start position:0%
exoneration cases, the innocent
defendants<00:09:02.160><c> offered</c><00:09:02.440><c> an</c><00:09:02.560><c> alibi</c><00:09:03.000><c> which</c><00:09:03.200><c> was</c>

00:09:03.350 --> 00:09:03.360 align:start position:0%
defendants offered an alibi which was
 

00:09:03.360 --> 00:09:06.030 align:start position:0%
defendants offered an alibi which was
not<00:09:03.560><c> believed</c><00:09:03.880><c> by</c><00:09:04.040><c> law</c><00:09:04.240><c> enforcement</c><00:09:05.160><c> and</c><00:09:05.760><c> weak</c>

00:09:06.030 --> 00:09:06.040 align:start position:0%
not believed by law enforcement and weak
 

00:09:06.040 --> 00:09:07.910 align:start position:0%
not believed by law enforcement and weak
alibis<00:09:06.600><c> were</c><00:09:06.720><c> used</c><00:09:06.960><c> by</c><00:09:07.080><c> prosecutors</c><00:09:07.760><c> as</c>

00:09:07.910 --> 00:09:07.920 align:start position:0%
alibis were used by prosecutors as
 

00:09:07.920 --> 00:09:09.829 align:start position:0%
alibis were used by prosecutors as
incriminating<00:09:08.640><c> evidence</c><00:09:09.080><c> at</c><00:09:09.240><c> trial.</c>

00:09:09.829 --> 00:09:09.839 align:start position:0%
incriminating evidence at trial.
 

00:09:09.839 --> 00:09:12.910 align:start position:0%
incriminating evidence at trial.
Fact-finders,<00:09:10.920><c> juries,</c><00:09:11.680><c> it</c><00:09:11.839><c> seems,</c><00:09:12.680><c> under</c>

00:09:12.910 --> 00:09:12.920 align:start position:0%
Fact-finders, juries, it seems, under
 

00:09:12.920 --> 00:09:14.910 align:start position:0%
Fact-finders, juries, it seems, under
believe<00:09:13.440><c> alibi</c><00:09:13.800><c> witnesses.</c><00:09:14.640><c> Defense</c>

00:09:14.910 --> 00:09:14.920 align:start position:0%
believe alibi witnesses. Defense
 

00:09:14.920 --> 00:09:17.590 align:start position:0%
believe alibi witnesses. Defense
counsel's<00:09:15.280><c> concerns</c><00:09:16.000><c> seem</c><00:09:16.360><c> validated</c><00:09:17.200><c> and</c>

00:09:17.590 --> 00:09:17.600 align:start position:0%
counsel's concerns seem validated and
 

00:09:17.600 --> 00:09:20.790 align:start position:0%
counsel's concerns seem validated and
courts'<00:09:18.040><c> fears</c><00:09:18.600><c> about</c><00:09:19.080><c> defendants</c><00:09:19.960><c> lying</c><00:09:20.600><c> or</c>

00:09:20.790 --> 00:09:20.800 align:start position:0%
courts' fears about defendants lying or
 

00:09:20.800 --> 00:09:24.110 align:start position:0%
courts' fears about defendants lying or
fabricating<00:09:21.560><c> alibis</c><00:09:22.280><c> seems</c><00:09:22.720><c> oversated.</c><00:09:23.560><c> Yes,</c>

00:09:24.110 --> 00:09:24.120 align:start position:0%
fabricating alibis seems oversated. Yes,
 

00:09:24.120 --> 00:09:26.550 align:start position:0%
fabricating alibis seems oversated. Yes,
an<00:09:24.240><c> alibi</c><00:09:24.680><c> can</c><00:09:24.960><c> be</c><00:09:25.120><c> fabricated,</c><00:09:25.880><c> but</c><00:09:26.160><c> so</c><00:09:26.400><c> can</c>

00:09:26.550 --> 00:09:26.560 align:start position:0%
an alibi can be fabricated, but so can
 

00:09:26.560 --> 00:09:28.790 align:start position:0%
an alibi can be fabricated, but so can
almost<00:09:27.040><c> all</c><00:09:27.480><c> other</c><00:09:27.680><c> testimony.</c><00:09:28.440><c> Deciding</c>

00:09:28.790 --> 00:09:28.800 align:start position:0%
almost all other testimony. Deciding
 

00:09:28.800 --> 00:09:30.510 align:start position:0%
almost all other testimony. Deciding
whether<00:09:29.000><c> an</c><00:09:29.120><c> alibi</c><00:09:29.400><c> witness</c><00:09:29.680><c> is</c><00:09:29.880><c> accurate</c><00:09:30.360><c> and</c>

00:09:30.510 --> 00:09:30.520 align:start position:0%
whether an alibi witness is accurate and
 

00:09:30.520 --> 00:09:32.710 align:start position:0%
whether an alibi witness is accurate and
truthful<00:09:31.000><c> is</c><00:09:31.200><c> hard.</c><00:09:31.960><c> It</c><00:09:32.080><c> is</c><00:09:32.240><c> easy</c><00:09:32.520><c> for</c><00:09:32.680><c> a</c>

00:09:32.710 --> 00:09:32.720 align:start position:0%
truthful is hard. It is easy for a
 

00:09:32.720 --> 00:09:34.750 align:start position:0%
truthful is hard. It is easy for a
suspect<00:09:33.200><c> to</c><00:09:33.280><c> make</c><00:09:33.480><c> a</c><00:09:33.560><c> good</c><00:09:33.800><c> faith</c><00:09:34.040><c> error</c><00:09:34.440><c> about</c>

00:09:34.750 --> 00:09:34.760 align:start position:0%
suspect to make a good faith error about
 

00:09:34.760 --> 00:09:36.590 align:start position:0%
suspect to make a good faith error about
where<00:09:34.920><c> he</c><00:09:35.120><c> was</c><00:09:35.440><c> when</c><00:09:35.600><c> first</c><00:09:35.839><c> confronted</c><00:09:36.400><c> by</c>

00:09:36.590 --> 00:09:36.600 align:start position:0%
where he was when first confronted by
 

00:09:36.600 --> 00:09:39.110 align:start position:0%
where he was when first confronted by
police<00:09:37.400><c> and</c><00:09:37.640><c> easy</c><00:09:38.160><c> for</c><00:09:38.360><c> potential</c><00:09:38.800><c> alibi</c>

00:09:39.110 --> 00:09:39.120 align:start position:0%
police and easy for potential alibi
 

00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:40.990 align:start position:0%
police and easy for potential alibi
witnesses<00:09:39.640><c> to</c><00:09:39.760><c> make</c><00:09:40.000><c> good</c><00:09:40.200><c> faith</c><00:09:40.480><c> errors</c>

00:09:40.990 --> 00:09:41.000 align:start position:0%
witnesses to make good faith errors
 

00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:43.470 align:start position:0%
witnesses to make good faith errors
about<00:09:41.240><c> the</c><00:09:41.320><c> details</c><00:09:41.760><c> of</c><00:09:41.880><c> what</c><00:09:42.080><c> was,</c><00:09:42.720><c> for</c><00:09:42.840><c> them,</c>

00:09:43.470 --> 00:09:43.480 align:start position:0%
about the details of what was, for them,
 

00:09:43.480 --> 00:09:45.390 align:start position:0%
about the details of what was, for them,
an<00:09:43.600><c> everyday</c><00:09:43.960><c> event.</c><00:09:44.680><c> But,</c><00:09:44.840><c> does</c><00:09:45.080><c> defense</c>

00:09:45.390 --> 00:09:45.400 align:start position:0%
an everyday event. But, does defense
 

00:09:45.400 --> 00:09:47.830 align:start position:0%
an everyday event. But, does defense
counsel<00:09:45.880><c> then</c><00:09:46.160><c> abandon</c><00:09:46.840><c> alibis</c><00:09:47.440><c> unless</c><00:09:47.680><c> they</c>

00:09:47.830 --> 00:09:47.840 align:start position:0%
counsel then abandon alibis unless they
 

00:09:47.840 --> 00:09:50.310 align:start position:0%
counsel then abandon alibis unless they
are<00:09:48.000><c> complete</c><00:09:48.760><c> and</c><00:09:49.240><c> unequivocal</c><00:09:49.840><c> based</c><00:09:50.160><c> on</c>

00:09:50.310 --> 00:09:50.320 align:start position:0%
are complete and unequivocal based on
 

00:09:50.320 --> 00:09:52.150 align:start position:0%
are complete and unequivocal based on
strangers<00:09:51.080><c> and</c><00:09:51.280><c> supported</c><00:09:51.720><c> by</c><00:09:51.840><c> physical</c>

00:09:52.150 --> 00:09:52.160 align:start position:0%
strangers and supported by physical
 

00:09:52.160 --> 00:09:55.030 align:start position:0%
strangers and supported by physical
evidence?<00:09:53.040><c> The</c><00:09:53.160><c> question</c><00:09:53.840><c> falls</c><00:09:54.160><c> largely</c><00:09:54.880><c> on</c>

00:09:55.030 --> 00:09:55.040 align:start position:0%
evidence? The question falls largely on
 

00:09:55.040 --> 00:09:57.230 align:start position:0%
evidence? The question falls largely on
defense<00:09:55.360><c> counsel</c><00:09:55.760><c> because</c><00:09:56.080><c> alibi</c><00:09:57.000><c> is</c><00:09:57.160><c> a</c>

00:09:57.230 --> 00:09:57.240 align:start position:0%
defense counsel because alibi is a
 

00:09:57.240 --> 00:09:59.830 align:start position:0%
defense counsel because alibi is a
reaction<00:09:58.240><c> to</c><00:09:58.360><c> the</c><00:09:58.480><c> prosecution.</c><00:09:59.560><c> Defense</c>

00:09:59.830 --> 00:09:59.840 align:start position:0%
reaction to the prosecution. Defense
 

00:09:59.840 --> 00:10:02.390 align:start position:0%
reaction to the prosecution. Defense
counsel<00:10:00.200><c> investigates</c><00:10:01.080><c> alibi</c><00:10:01.400><c> witnesses</c><00:10:02.240><c> and</c>

00:10:02.390 --> 00:10:02.400 align:start position:0%
counsel investigates alibi witnesses and
 

00:10:02.400 --> 00:10:04.350 align:start position:0%
counsel investigates alibi witnesses and
looks<00:10:02.600><c> for</c><00:10:02.760><c> confirming</c><00:10:03.400><c> evidence.</c><00:10:03.920><c> Counsel</c>

00:10:04.350 --> 00:10:04.360 align:start position:0%
looks for confirming evidence. Counsel
 

00:10:04.360 --> 00:10:06.270 align:start position:0%
looks for confirming evidence. Counsel
decides<00:10:05.040><c> whether</c><00:10:05.080><c> to</c><00:10:05.320><c> offer</c><00:10:05.840><c> an</c><00:10:06.000><c> alibi</c>

00:10:06.270 --> 00:10:06.280 align:start position:0%
decides whether to offer an alibi
 

00:10:06.280 --> 00:10:08.870 align:start position:0%
decides whether to offer an alibi
defense,<00:10:07.160><c> giving</c><00:10:07.520><c> appropriate</c><00:10:08.000><c> notice,</c><00:10:08.480><c> and</c>

00:10:08.870 --> 00:10:08.880 align:start position:0%
defense, giving appropriate notice, and
 

00:10:08.880 --> 00:10:11.190 align:start position:0%
defense, giving appropriate notice, and
chooses<00:10:09.600><c> what</c><00:10:09.840><c> witnesses</c><00:10:10.280><c> to</c><00:10:10.400><c> present</c><00:10:10.960><c> and</c>

00:10:11.190 --> 00:10:11.200 align:start position:0%
chooses what witnesses to present and
 

00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:13.670 align:start position:0%
chooses what witnesses to present and
how.<00:10:11.720><c> Only</c><00:10:12.120><c> offering</c><00:10:12.560><c> an</c><00:10:12.680><c> alibi</c><00:10:13.120><c> supported</c><00:10:13.560><c> by</c>

00:10:13.670 --> 00:10:13.680 align:start position:0%
how. Only offering an alibi supported by
 

00:10:13.680 --> 00:10:15.790 align:start position:0%
how. Only offering an alibi supported by
physical<00:10:14.000><c> evidence</c><00:10:14.360><c> would</c><00:10:14.520><c> mean</c><00:10:15.120><c> very</c><00:10:15.520><c> few</c>

00:10:15.790 --> 00:10:15.800 align:start position:0%
physical evidence would mean very few
 

00:10:15.800 --> 00:10:18.670 align:start position:0%
physical evidence would mean very few
alibis<00:10:16.400><c> would</c><00:10:16.600><c> ever</c><00:10:16.840><c> be</c><00:10:17.040><c> offered.</c><00:10:18.040><c> Alibis</c>

00:10:18.670 --> 00:10:18.680 align:start position:0%
alibis would ever be offered. Alibis
 

00:10:18.680 --> 00:10:20.470 align:start position:0%
alibis would ever be offered. Alibis
supported<00:10:19.080><c> by</c><00:10:19.200><c> strong</c><00:10:19.640><c> physical</c><00:10:19.960><c> evidence</c>

00:10:20.470 --> 00:10:20.480 align:start position:0%
supported by strong physical evidence
 

00:10:20.480 --> 00:10:24.190 align:start position:0%
supported by strong physical evidence
are<00:10:20.720><c> very</c><00:10:21.320><c> rare.</c><00:10:21.920><c> In</c><00:10:22.080><c> 2012,</c><00:10:22.840><c> only</c><00:10:23.160><c> 14%</c><00:10:24.040><c> of</c>

00:10:24.190 --> 00:10:24.200 align:start position:0%
are very rare. In 2012, only 14% of
 

00:10:24.200 --> 00:10:26.590 align:start position:0%
are very rare. In 2012, only 14% of
alibis<00:10:24.680><c> offered</c><00:10:25.080><c> in</c><00:10:25.240><c> survey</c><00:10:25.720><c> of</c><00:10:25.840><c> American</c><00:10:26.360><c> and</c>

00:10:26.590 --> 00:10:26.600 align:start position:0%
alibis offered in survey of American and
 

00:10:26.600 --> 00:10:28.710 align:start position:0%
alibis offered in survey of American and
Canadian<00:10:27.120><c> cases</c><00:10:27.880><c> were</c><00:10:28.040><c> supported</c><00:10:28.600><c> by</c>

00:10:28.710 --> 00:10:28.720 align:start position:0%
Canadian cases were supported by
 

00:10:28.720 --> 00:10:30.830 align:start position:0%
Canadian cases were supported by
physical<00:10:29.160><c> evidence,</c><00:10:29.720><c> but</c><00:10:30.080><c> this</c><00:10:30.480><c> may</c><00:10:30.680><c> be</c>

00:10:30.830 --> 00:10:30.840 align:start position:0%
physical evidence, but this may be
 

00:10:30.840 --> 00:10:33.230 align:start position:0%
physical evidence, but this may be
changing.<00:10:31.800><c> Cell</c><00:10:32.000><c> phone</c><00:10:32.200><c> location</c><00:10:32.640><c> history</c>

00:10:33.230 --> 00:10:33.240 align:start position:0%
changing. Cell phone location history
 

00:10:33.240 --> 00:10:35.190 align:start position:0%
changing. Cell phone location history
apps<00:10:33.680><c> and</c><00:10:33.880><c> call</c><00:10:34.080><c> records</c><00:10:34.520><c> may</c><00:10:34.680><c> document</c><00:10:35.040><c> a</c>

00:10:35.190 --> 00:10:35.200 align:start position:0%
apps and call records may document a
 

00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:37.350 align:start position:0%
apps and call records may document a
witness'<00:10:35.760><c> or</c><00:10:36.040><c> defendant's</c><00:10:36.480><c> location</c><00:10:36.960><c> at</c><00:10:37.160><c> key</c>

00:10:37.350 --> 00:10:37.360 align:start position:0%
witness' or defendant's location at key
 

00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:39.470 align:start position:0%
witness' or defendant's location at key
times.<00:10:37.920><c> Admittedly,</c><00:10:38.600><c> these</c><00:10:38.920><c> locate</c><00:10:39.400><c> the</c>

00:10:39.470 --> 00:10:39.480 align:start position:0%
times. Admittedly, these locate the
 

00:10:39.480 --> 00:10:42.390 align:start position:0%
times. Admittedly, these locate the
device,<00:10:40.040><c> however,</c><00:10:40.600><c> not</c><00:10:41.160><c> who</c><00:10:41.560><c> is</c><00:10:41.760><c> holding</c><00:10:42.120><c> it.</c>

00:10:42.390 --> 00:10:42.400 align:start position:0%
device, however, not who is holding it.
 

00:10:42.400 --> 00:10:44.390 align:start position:0%
device, however, not who is holding it.
But,<00:10:42.760><c> it</c><00:10:42.839><c> may</c><00:10:43.000><c> be</c><00:10:43.120><c> persuasive</c><00:10:43.600><c> corroboration,</c>

00:10:44.390 --> 00:10:44.400 align:start position:0%
But, it may be persuasive corroboration,
 

00:10:44.400 --> 00:10:46.030 align:start position:0%
But, it may be persuasive corroboration,
even<00:10:44.600><c> if</c><00:10:44.720><c> not</c><00:10:45.000><c> absolute.</c><00:10:45.760><c> I</c><00:10:45.839><c> would</c><00:10:45.960><c> be</c>

00:10:46.030 --> 00:10:46.040 align:start position:0%
even if not absolute. I would be
 

00:10:46.040 --> 00:10:47.550 align:start position:0%
even if not absolute. I would be
interested<00:10:46.440><c> to</c><00:10:46.480><c> see</c><00:10:46.720><c> what</c><00:10:46.920><c> the</c><00:10:47.120><c> updated</c>

00:10:47.550 --> 00:10:47.560 align:start position:0%
interested to see what the updated
 

00:10:47.560 --> 00:10:51.790 align:start position:0%
interested to see what the updated
numbers<00:10:48.080><c> are</c><00:10:48.520><c> in</c><00:10:49.080><c> 2026</c><00:10:50.040><c> versus</c><00:10:50.320><c> 2012</c><00:10:51.400><c> on</c><00:10:51.720><c> the</c>

00:10:51.790 --> 00:10:51.800 align:start position:0%
numbers are in 2026 versus 2012 on the
 

00:10:51.800 --> 00:10:53.230 align:start position:0%
numbers are in 2026 versus 2012 on the
percentage<00:10:52.200><c> of</c><00:10:52.320><c> alibis</c><00:10:52.680><c> that</c><00:10:52.800><c> are</c><00:10:52.880><c> supported</c>

00:10:53.230 --> 00:10:53.240 align:start position:0%
percentage of alibis that are supported
 

00:10:53.240 --> 00:10:54.510 align:start position:0%
percentage of alibis that are supported
by<00:10:53.320><c> physical</c><00:10:53.680><c> evidence,</c><00:10:54.040><c> but</c><00:10:54.200><c> you</c><00:10:54.280><c> would</c><00:10:54.400><c> be</c>

00:10:54.510 --> 00:10:54.520 align:start position:0%
by physical evidence, but you would be
 

00:10:54.520 --> 00:10:57.310 align:start position:0%
by physical evidence, but you would be
surprised<00:10:55.000><c> even</c><00:10:55.240><c> in</c><00:10:55.320><c> the</c><00:10:55.560><c> age</c><00:10:56.320><c> of</c><00:10:56.520><c> cell</c><00:10:56.760><c> phones</c>

00:10:57.310 --> 00:10:57.320 align:start position:0%
surprised even in the age of cell phones
 

00:10:57.320 --> 00:10:59.590 align:start position:0%
surprised even in the age of cell phones
and<00:10:57.560><c> data</c><00:10:57.960><c> and</c><00:10:58.120><c> all</c><00:10:58.280><c> of</c><00:10:58.400><c> that,</c><00:10:58.839><c> it</c><00:10:59.120><c> can</c><00:10:59.400><c> be</c>

00:10:59.590 --> 00:10:59.600 align:start position:0%
and data and all of that, it can be
 

00:10:59.600 --> 00:11:03.110 align:start position:0%
and data and all of that, it can be
difficult<00:11:00.280><c> to</c><00:11:00.880><c> have</c><00:11:01.400><c> a</c><00:11:01.760><c> firm</c><00:11:02.320><c> firm</c><00:11:02.720><c> alibi</c>

00:11:03.110 --> 00:11:03.120 align:start position:0%
difficult to have a firm firm alibi
 

00:11:03.120 --> 00:11:05.550 align:start position:0%
difficult to have a firm firm alibi
supported<00:11:03.920><c> by</c><00:11:04.320><c> very</c><00:11:04.760><c> very</c><00:11:05.000><c> convincing</c>

00:11:05.550 --> 00:11:05.560 align:start position:0%
supported by very very convincing
 

00:11:05.560 --> 00:11:07.550 align:start position:0%
supported by very very convincing
physical<00:11:05.880><c> evidence.</c><00:11:06.520><c> More</c><00:11:06.760><c> often</c><00:11:07.000><c> than</c><00:11:07.120><c> not,</c>

00:11:07.550 --> 00:11:07.560 align:start position:0%
physical evidence. More often than not,
 

00:11:07.560 --> 00:11:09.190 align:start position:0%
physical evidence. More often than not,
that<00:11:07.760><c> is</c><00:11:07.880><c> not</c><00:11:08.000><c> the</c><00:11:08.120><c> case.</c><00:11:08.640><c> Further,</c><00:11:09.040><c> the</c>

00:11:09.190 --> 00:11:09.200 align:start position:0%
that is not the case. Further, the
 

00:11:09.200 --> 00:11:11.350 align:start position:0%
that is not the case. Further, the
witnesses<00:11:10.120><c> who</c><00:11:10.280><c> are</c><00:11:10.400><c> most</c><00:11:10.760><c> likely</c><00:11:11.120><c> to</c><00:11:11.240><c> be</c>

00:11:11.350 --> 00:11:11.360 align:start position:0%
witnesses who are most likely to be
 

00:11:11.360 --> 00:11:13.990 align:start position:0%
witnesses who are most likely to be
believed<00:11:12.000><c> are</c><00:11:12.280><c> also</c><00:11:13.040><c> the</c><00:11:13.160><c> most</c><00:11:13.520><c> likely</c><00:11:13.839><c> to</c>

00:11:13.990 --> 00:11:14.000 align:start position:0%
believed are also the most likely to
 

00:11:14.000 --> 00:11:16.630 align:start position:0%
believed are also the most likely to
forget<00:11:14.640><c> having</c><00:11:15.000><c> seen</c><00:11:15.440><c> the</c><00:11:15.560><c> defendant.</c><00:11:16.200><c> Per</c><00:11:16.520><c> a</c>

00:11:16.630 --> 00:11:16.640 align:start position:0%
forget having seen the defendant. Per a
 

00:11:16.640 --> 00:11:19.350 align:start position:0%
forget having seen the defendant. Per a
study<00:11:17.080><c> published</c><00:11:17.560><c> in</c><00:11:17.680><c> 2016,</c><00:11:18.640><c> some</c><00:11:18.960><c> innocent</c>

00:11:19.350 --> 00:11:19.360 align:start position:0%
study published in 2016, some innocent
 

00:11:19.360 --> 00:11:21.590 align:start position:0%
study published in 2016, some innocent
suspects<00:11:20.040><c> often</c><00:11:20.440><c> rely</c><00:11:20.880><c> on</c><00:11:21.040><c> the</c><00:11:21.160><c> memory</c><00:11:21.480><c> of</c>

00:11:21.590 --> 00:11:21.600 align:start position:0%
suspects often rely on the memory of
 

00:11:21.600 --> 00:11:24.070 align:start position:0%
suspects often rely on the memory of
strangers<00:11:22.200><c> to</c><00:11:22.360><c> corroborate</c><00:11:23.040><c> their</c><00:11:23.240><c> alibis.</c>

00:11:24.070 --> 00:11:24.080 align:start position:0%
strangers to corroborate their alibis.
 

00:11:24.080 --> 00:11:25.829 align:start position:0%
strangers to corroborate their alibis.
These<00:11:24.360><c> researchers</c><00:11:24.839><c> pointed</c><00:11:25.200><c> out</c><00:11:25.400><c> that</c><00:11:25.560><c> no</c>

00:11:25.829 --> 00:11:25.839 align:start position:0%
These researchers pointed out that no
 

00:11:25.839 --> 00:11:27.510 align:start position:0%
These researchers pointed out that no
research<00:11:26.320><c> had</c><00:11:26.480><c> examined</c><00:11:27.000><c> whether</c><00:11:27.240><c> such</c>

00:11:27.510 --> 00:11:27.520 align:start position:0%
research had examined whether such
 

00:11:27.520 --> 00:11:29.150 align:start position:0%
research had examined whether such
potential<00:11:27.880><c> alibi</c><00:11:28.200><c> corroborators</c><00:11:28.839><c> could</c>

00:11:29.150 --> 00:11:29.160 align:start position:0%
potential alibi corroborators could
 

00:11:29.160 --> 00:11:31.710 align:start position:0%
potential alibi corroborators could
accurately<00:11:29.720><c> recognize</c><00:11:30.640><c> an</c><00:11:30.839><c> innocent</c><00:11:31.240><c> suspect</c>

00:11:31.710 --> 00:11:31.720 align:start position:0%
accurately recognize an innocent suspect
 

00:11:31.720 --> 00:11:33.470 align:start position:0%
accurately recognize an innocent suspect
with<00:11:31.839><c> whom</c><00:11:32.040><c> they</c><00:11:32.200><c> previously</c><00:11:32.760><c> interacted.</c>

00:11:33.470 --> 00:11:33.480 align:start position:0%
with whom they previously interacted.
 

00:11:33.480 --> 00:11:35.470 align:start position:0%
with whom they previously interacted.
Thus,<00:11:33.880><c> they</c><00:11:34.000><c> developed</c><00:11:34.480><c> a</c><00:11:34.560><c> novel</c><00:11:35.120><c> alibi</c>

00:11:35.470 --> 00:11:35.480 align:start position:0%
Thus, they developed a novel alibi
 

00:11:35.480 --> 00:11:37.390 align:start position:0%
Thus, they developed a novel alibi
corroboration<00:11:36.120><c> paradigm</c><00:11:37.000><c> in</c><00:11:37.120><c> which</c>

00:11:37.390 --> 00:11:37.400 align:start position:0%
corroboration paradigm in which
 

00:11:37.400 --> 00:11:39.390 align:start position:0%
corroboration paradigm in which
undergraduate<00:11:38.160><c> students,</c><00:11:38.880><c> representing</c>

00:11:39.390 --> 00:11:39.400 align:start position:0%
undergraduate students, representing
 

00:11:39.400 --> 00:11:41.030 align:start position:0%
undergraduate students, representing
innocent<00:11:39.800><c> suspects</c><00:11:40.400><c> who</c><00:11:40.600><c> would</c><00:11:40.760><c> later</c>

00:11:41.030 --> 00:11:41.040 align:start position:0%
innocent suspects who would later
 

00:11:41.040 --> 00:11:43.350 align:start position:0%
innocent suspects who would later
provide<00:11:41.360><c> an</c><00:11:41.480><c> alibi,</c><00:11:41.960><c> interacted</c><00:11:42.640><c> with</c><00:11:42.840><c> naive</c>

00:11:43.350 --> 00:11:43.360 align:start position:0%
provide an alibi, interacted with naive
 

00:11:43.360 --> 00:11:45.270 align:start position:0%
provide an alibi, interacted with naive
university<00:11:43.880><c> employees,</c><00:11:44.800><c> representing</c>

00:11:45.270 --> 00:11:45.280 align:start position:0%
university employees, representing
 

00:11:45.280 --> 00:11:47.190 align:start position:0%
university employees, representing
potential<00:11:45.720><c> alibi</c><00:11:46.080><c> corroborators.</c><00:11:47.040><c> Each</c>

00:11:47.190 --> 00:11:47.200 align:start position:0%
potential alibi corroborators. Each
 

00:11:47.200 --> 00:11:48.750 align:start position:0%
potential alibi corroborators. Each
student<00:11:47.560><c> briefly</c><00:11:48.040><c> interacted</c><00:11:48.480><c> with</c><00:11:48.680><c> a</c>

00:11:48.750 --> 00:11:48.760 align:start position:0%
student briefly interacted with a
 

00:11:48.760 --> 00:11:51.710 align:start position:0%
student briefly interacted with a
different<00:11:49.640><c> naive</c><00:11:50.280><c> university</c><00:11:50.720><c> employee</c><00:11:51.560><c> and</c>

00:11:51.710 --> 00:11:51.720 align:start position:0%
different naive university employee and
 

00:11:51.720 --> 00:11:53.550 align:start position:0%
different naive university employee and
were<00:11:51.880><c> also</c><00:11:52.240><c> each</c><00:11:52.480><c> yoked</c><00:11:52.960><c> to</c><00:11:53.080><c> a</c><00:11:53.160><c> different</c>

00:11:53.550 --> 00:11:53.560 align:start position:0%
were also each yoked to a different
 

00:11:53.560 --> 00:11:55.070 align:start position:0%
were also each yoked to a different
employee<00:11:54.040><c> with</c><00:11:54.200><c> whom</c><00:11:54.400><c> they</c><00:11:54.520><c> did</c><00:11:54.680><c> not</c>

00:11:55.070 --> 00:11:55.080 align:start position:0%
employee with whom they did not
 

00:11:55.080 --> 00:11:57.190 align:start position:0%
employee with whom they did not
interact.<00:11:55.600><c> Employees</c><00:11:56.080><c> represented</c><00:11:56.560><c> 24</c><00:11:56.960><c> hours</c>

00:11:57.190 --> 00:11:57.200 align:start position:0%
interact. Employees represented 24 hours
 

00:11:57.200 --> 00:11:59.150 align:start position:0%
interact. Employees represented 24 hours
later<00:11:57.520><c> with</c><00:11:57.760><c> either</c><00:11:58.040><c> a</c><00:11:58.160><c> single</c><00:11:58.560><c> photograph</c><00:11:59.040><c> of</c>

00:11:59.150 --> 00:11:59.160 align:start position:0%
later with either a single photograph of
 

00:11:59.160 --> 00:12:02.150 align:start position:0%
later with either a single photograph of
the<00:11:59.280><c> student</c><00:12:00.120><c> or</c><00:12:00.600><c> a</c><00:12:00.720><c> six-person</c><00:12:01.480><c> array</c>

00:12:02.150 --> 00:12:02.160 align:start position:0%
the student or a six-person array
 

00:12:02.160 --> 00:12:04.190 align:start position:0%
the student or a six-person array
containing<00:12:02.600><c> a</c><00:12:02.680><c> photograph</c><00:12:03.320><c> of</c><00:12:03.440><c> the</c><00:12:03.560><c> student</c>

00:12:04.190 --> 00:12:04.200 align:start position:0%
containing a photograph of the student
 

00:12:04.200 --> 00:12:06.110 align:start position:0%
containing a photograph of the student
and<00:12:04.360><c> were</c><00:12:04.520><c> asked</c><00:12:04.960><c> if</c><00:12:05.080><c> they</c><00:12:05.200><c> recognized</c>

00:12:06.110 --> 00:12:06.120 align:start position:0%
and were asked if they recognized
 

00:12:06.120 --> 00:12:09.030 align:start position:0%
and were asked if they recognized
anyone.<00:12:06.720><c> The</c><00:12:06.800><c> majority</c><00:12:07.240><c> of</c><00:12:07.360><c> employees</c><00:12:08.280><c> failed</c>

00:12:09.030 --> 00:12:09.040 align:start position:0%
anyone. The majority of employees failed
 

00:12:09.040 --> 00:12:10.750 align:start position:0%
anyone. The majority of employees failed
to<00:12:09.160><c> make</c><00:12:09.320><c> a</c><00:12:09.400><c> correct</c><00:12:09.960><c> recognition</c><00:12:10.560><c> of</c><00:12:10.640><c> the</c>

00:12:10.750 --> 00:12:10.760 align:start position:0%
to make a correct recognition of the
 

00:12:10.760 --> 00:12:12.430 align:start position:0%
to make a correct recognition of the
student.<00:12:11.280><c> False</c><00:12:11.560><c> recognitions,</c><00:12:12.080><c> however,</c>

00:12:12.430 --> 00:12:12.440 align:start position:0%
student. False recognitions, however,
 

00:12:12.440 --> 00:12:14.030 align:start position:0%
student. False recognitions, however,
were<00:12:12.640><c> rare.</c><00:12:13.120><c> Students</c><00:12:13.520><c> exhibited</c>

00:12:14.030 --> 00:12:14.040 align:start position:0%
were rare. Students exhibited
 

00:12:14.040 --> 00:12:15.230 align:start position:0%
were rare. Students exhibited
overconfidence<00:12:14.800><c> that</c><00:12:14.920><c> they</c><00:12:15.040><c> would</c><00:12:15.120><c> be</c>

00:12:15.230 --> 00:12:15.240 align:start position:0%
overconfidence that they would be
 

00:12:15.240 --> 00:12:18.470 align:start position:0%
overconfidence that they would be
recognized.<00:12:16.080><c> Findings</c><00:12:16.840><c> imply</c><00:12:17.880><c> that</c><00:12:18.080><c> innocent</c>

00:12:18.470 --> 00:12:18.480 align:start position:0%
recognized. Findings imply that innocent
 

00:12:18.480 --> 00:12:20.470 align:start position:0%
recognized. Findings imply that innocent
suspects<00:12:18.920><c> who</c><00:12:19.080><c> rely</c><00:12:19.640><c> on</c><00:12:19.840><c> strangers</c><00:12:20.360><c> to</c>

00:12:20.470 --> 00:12:20.480 align:start position:0%
suspects who rely on strangers to
 

00:12:20.480 --> 00:12:23.510 align:start position:0%
suspects who rely on strangers to
corroborate<00:12:21.000><c> their</c><00:12:21.200><c> alibis</c><00:12:21.920><c> may</c><00:12:22.160><c> be</c><00:12:22.320><c> at</c><00:12:22.520><c> risk.</c>

00:12:23.510 --> 00:12:23.520 align:start position:0%
corroborate their alibis may be at risk.
 

00:12:23.520 --> 00:12:25.830 align:start position:0%
corroborate their alibis may be at risk.
Quote,<00:12:24.120><c> "My</c><00:12:24.240><c> heart</c><00:12:24.480><c> started</c><00:12:24.800><c> pounding.</c><00:12:25.640><c> I</c><00:12:25.720><c> had</c>

00:12:25.830 --> 00:12:25.840 align:start position:0%
Quote, "My heart started pounding. I had
 

00:12:25.840 --> 00:12:27.990 align:start position:0%
Quote, "My heart started pounding. I had
gotten<00:12:26.120><c> my</c><00:12:26.240><c> weekends</c><00:12:26.640><c> confused,</c><00:12:27.640><c> which</c><00:12:27.840><c> meant</c>

00:12:27.990 --> 00:12:28.000 align:start position:0%
gotten my weekends confused, which meant
 

00:12:28.000 --> 00:12:29.950 align:start position:0%
gotten my weekends confused, which meant
the<00:12:28.080><c> alibi</c><00:12:28.480><c> I</c><00:12:28.560><c> gave</c><00:12:28.800><c> to</c><00:12:28.880><c> the</c><00:12:28.960><c> police</c><00:12:29.560><c> was</c><00:12:29.720><c> not</c>

00:12:29.950 --> 00:12:29.960 align:start position:0%
the alibi I gave to the police was not
 

00:12:29.960 --> 00:12:31.870 align:start position:0%
the alibi I gave to the police was not
going<00:12:30.120><c> to</c><00:12:30.200><c> check</c><00:12:30.480><c> out</c><00:12:30.720><c> at</c><00:12:30.880><c> all."</c><00:12:31.520><c> Ronald</c>

00:12:31.870 --> 00:12:31.880 align:start position:0%
going to check out at all." Ronald
 

00:12:31.880 --> 00:12:34.790 align:start position:0%
going to check out at all." Ronald
Cotton,<00:12:32.400><c> exonerated</c><00:12:32.920><c> defendant</c><00:12:33.520><c> in</c><00:12:33.680><c> 2009.</c><00:12:34.680><c> An</c>

00:12:34.790 --> 00:12:34.800 align:start position:0%
Cotton, exonerated defendant in 2009. An
 

00:12:34.800 --> 00:12:36.670 align:start position:0%
Cotton, exonerated defendant in 2009. An
innocent<00:12:35.160><c> suspect</c><00:12:35.680><c> may</c><00:12:35.839><c> first</c><00:12:36.120><c> learn</c><00:12:36.400><c> that</c><00:12:36.560><c> he</c>

00:12:36.670 --> 00:12:36.680 align:start position:0%
innocent suspect may first learn that he
 

00:12:36.680 --> 00:12:38.350 align:start position:0%
innocent suspect may first learn that he
or<00:12:36.800><c> she</c><00:12:36.920><c> needs</c><00:12:37.120><c> an</c><00:12:37.240><c> alibi</c><00:12:37.760><c> when</c><00:12:37.960><c> first</c>

00:12:38.350 --> 00:12:38.360 align:start position:0%
or she needs an alibi when first
 

00:12:38.360 --> 00:12:40.750 align:start position:0%
or she needs an alibi when first
questioned<00:12:38.920><c> by</c><00:12:39.080><c> police.</c><00:12:40.000><c> Questioning</c><00:12:40.640><c> may</c>

00:12:40.750 --> 00:12:40.760 align:start position:0%
questioned by police. Questioning may
 

00:12:40.760 --> 00:12:42.870 align:start position:0%
questioned by police. Questioning may
occur<00:12:41.200><c> soon</c><00:12:41.760><c> after</c><00:12:42.000><c> the</c><00:12:42.080><c> crime,</c><00:12:42.560><c> when</c><00:12:42.720><c> the</c>

00:12:42.870 --> 00:12:42.880 align:start position:0%
occur soon after the crime, when the
 

00:12:42.880 --> 00:12:45.030 align:start position:0%
occur soon after the crime, when the
suspect's<00:12:43.320><c> memory</c><00:12:43.600><c> of</c><00:12:43.720><c> where</c><00:12:43.839><c> he</c><00:12:44.040><c> or</c><00:12:44.160><c> she</c><00:12:44.560><c> was</c>

00:12:45.030 --> 00:12:45.040 align:start position:0%
suspect's memory of where he or she was
 

00:12:45.040 --> 00:12:46.910 align:start position:0%
suspect's memory of where he or she was
should<00:12:45.240><c> be</c><00:12:45.400><c> fresh,</c><00:12:45.880><c> but</c><00:12:46.040><c> it</c><00:12:46.120><c> may</c><00:12:46.280><c> also</c><00:12:46.600><c> occur</c>

00:12:46.910 --> 00:12:46.920 align:start position:0%
should be fresh, but it may also occur
 

00:12:46.920 --> 00:12:48.870 align:start position:0%
should be fresh, but it may also occur
days,<00:12:47.360><c> weeks,</c><00:12:47.720><c> or</c><00:12:47.839><c> months</c><00:12:48.160><c> later.</c><00:12:48.800><c> The</c>

00:12:48.870 --> 00:12:48.880 align:start position:0%
days, weeks, or months later. The
 

00:12:48.880 --> 00:12:50.590 align:start position:0%
days, weeks, or months later. The
innocent<00:12:49.200><c> suspect's</c><00:12:49.600><c> memory</c><00:12:50.040><c> of</c><00:12:50.160><c> his</c><00:12:50.360><c> or</c><00:12:50.440><c> her</c>

00:12:50.590 --> 00:12:50.600 align:start position:0%
innocent suspect's memory of his or her
 

00:12:50.600 --> 00:12:52.190 align:start position:0%
innocent suspect's memory of his or her
whereabouts<00:12:51.040><c> on</c><00:12:51.120><c> a</c><00:12:51.200><c> past</c><00:12:51.480><c> day</c><00:12:51.600><c> in</c><00:12:51.760><c> time</c><00:12:52.040><c> that</c>

00:12:52.190 --> 00:12:52.200 align:start position:0%
whereabouts on a past day in time that
 

00:12:52.200 --> 00:12:54.630 align:start position:0%
whereabouts on a past day in time that
had<00:12:52.800><c> no</c><00:12:53.000><c> significance</c><00:12:53.720><c> until</c><00:12:54.000><c> that</c><00:12:54.200><c> moment</c>

00:12:54.630 --> 00:12:54.640 align:start position:0%
had no significance until that moment
 

00:12:54.640 --> 00:12:56.870 align:start position:0%
had no significance until that moment
may<00:12:54.800><c> be</c><00:12:54.960><c> wrong,</c><00:12:55.440><c> but</c><00:12:55.800><c> a</c><00:12:55.880><c> good-faith</c><00:12:56.400><c> mistake</c>

00:12:56.870 --> 00:12:56.880 align:start position:0%
may be wrong, but a good-faith mistake
 

00:12:56.880 --> 00:12:59.750 align:start position:0%
may be wrong, but a good-faith mistake
may<00:12:57.000><c> be</c><00:12:57.120><c> interpreted</c><00:12:57.960><c> as</c><00:12:58.160><c> a</c><00:12:58.240><c> deliberate</c><00:12:59.040><c> lie</c>

00:12:59.750 --> 00:12:59.760 align:start position:0%
may be interpreted as a deliberate lie
 

00:12:59.760 --> 00:13:02.270 align:start position:0%
may be interpreted as a deliberate lie
by<00:12:59.920><c> a</c><00:13:00.160><c> jury,</c><00:13:00.760><c> prosecutor,</c><00:13:01.520><c> law</c><00:13:01.640><c> enforcement,</c>

00:13:02.270 --> 00:13:02.280 align:start position:0%
by a jury, prosecutor, law enforcement,
 

00:13:02.280 --> 00:13:04.550 align:start position:0%
by a jury, prosecutor, law enforcement,
or<00:13:02.680><c> a</c><00:13:02.760><c> judge.</c><00:13:03.400><c> None</c><00:13:03.560><c> of</c><00:13:03.680><c> you</c><00:13:03.760><c> should</c><00:13:04.040><c> ever</c>

00:13:04.550 --> 00:13:04.560 align:start position:0%
or a judge. None of you should ever
 

00:13:04.560 --> 00:13:06.590 align:start position:0%
or a judge. None of you should ever
allow<00:13:05.600><c> yourself</c><00:13:05.960><c> to</c><00:13:06.000><c> be</c><00:13:06.120><c> questioned</c><00:13:06.480><c> by</c>

00:13:06.590 --> 00:13:06.600 align:start position:0%
allow yourself to be questioned by
 

00:13:06.600 --> 00:13:08.030 align:start position:0%
allow yourself to be questioned by
police,<00:13:07.280><c> no</c><00:13:07.360><c> matter</c><00:13:07.520><c> how</c><00:13:07.680><c> innocent,</c><00:13:08.000><c> no</c>

00:13:08.030 --> 00:13:08.040 align:start position:0%
police, no matter how innocent, no
 

00:13:08.040 --> 00:13:09.190 align:start position:0%
police, no matter how innocent, no
matter<00:13:08.200><c> how</c><00:13:08.280><c> guilty</c><00:13:08.520><c> you</c><00:13:08.600><c> are,</c><00:13:08.839><c> without</c><00:13:09.160><c> a</c>

00:13:09.190 --> 00:13:09.200 align:start position:0%
matter how guilty you are, without a
 

00:13:09.200 --> 00:13:10.550 align:start position:0%
matter how guilty you are, without a
lawyer<00:13:09.400><c> present,</c><00:13:09.680><c> without</c><00:13:09.880><c> lawyering</c><00:13:10.400><c> the</c>

00:13:10.550 --> 00:13:10.560 align:start position:0%
lawyer present, without lawyering the
 

00:13:10.560 --> 00:13:13.030 align:start position:0%
lawyer present, without lawyering the
hell<00:13:10.800><c> up.</c><00:13:11.600><c> But,</c><00:13:12.040><c> people</c><00:13:12.440><c> often</c><00:13:12.680><c> don't</c><00:13:12.880><c> do</c>

00:13:13.030 --> 00:13:13.040 align:start position:0%
hell up. But, people often don't do
 

00:13:13.040 --> 00:13:15.829 align:start position:0%
hell up. But, people often don't do
that,<00:13:13.400><c> and</c><00:13:13.640><c> as</c><00:13:13.839><c> I</c><00:13:13.920><c> will</c><00:13:14.040><c> note</c><00:13:14.480><c> soon,</c><00:13:15.440><c> innocent</c>

00:13:15.829 --> 00:13:15.839 align:start position:0%
that, and as I will note soon, innocent
 

00:13:15.839 --> 00:13:19.350 align:start position:0%
that, and as I will note soon, innocent
people,<00:13:16.120><c> especially,</c><00:13:17.120><c> are</c><00:13:17.280><c> the</c><00:13:17.400><c> ones</c><00:13:18.160><c> most</c><00:13:19.080><c> at</c>

00:13:19.350 --> 00:13:19.360 align:start position:0%
people, especially, are the ones most at
 

00:13:19.360 --> 00:13:23.110 align:start position:0%
people, especially, are the ones most at
risk<00:13:20.040><c> to</c><00:13:20.720><c> inconsistent</c><00:13:21.640><c> alibis.</c><00:13:22.960><c> In</c>

00:13:23.110 --> 00:13:23.120 align:start position:0%
risk to inconsistent alibis. In
 

00:13:23.120 --> 00:13:24.990 align:start position:0%
risk to inconsistent alibis. In
practice,<00:13:23.720><c> observers</c><00:13:24.200><c> have</c><00:13:24.320><c> noted</c><00:13:24.640><c> that</c><00:13:24.760><c> if</c><00:13:24.880><c> a</c>

00:13:24.990 --> 00:13:25.000 align:start position:0%
practice, observers have noted that if a
 

00:13:25.000 --> 00:13:26.950 align:start position:0%
practice, observers have noted that if a
suspect<00:13:25.680><c> being</c><00:13:25.920><c> questioned</c><00:13:26.280><c> by</c><00:13:26.400><c> police</c>

00:13:26.950 --> 00:13:26.960 align:start position:0%
suspect being questioned by police
 

00:13:26.960 --> 00:13:29.150 align:start position:0%
suspect being questioned by police
offers<00:13:27.400><c> an</c><00:13:27.520><c> alibi,</c><00:13:27.960><c> quote,</c><00:13:28.360><c> the</c><00:13:28.480><c> interrogator</c>

00:13:29.150 --> 00:13:29.160 align:start position:0%
offers an alibi, quote, the interrogator
 

00:13:29.160 --> 00:13:30.990 align:start position:0%
offers an alibi, quote, the interrogator
will<00:13:29.360><c> attack</c><00:13:29.800><c> it</c><00:13:30.000><c> as</c><00:13:30.160><c> inconsistent,</c>

00:13:30.990 --> 00:13:31.000 align:start position:0%
will attack it as inconsistent,
 

00:13:31.000 --> 00:13:32.430 align:start position:0%
will attack it as inconsistent,
contradicted<00:13:31.640><c> by</c><00:13:31.840><c> all</c><00:13:32.000><c> of</c><00:13:32.080><c> the</c><00:13:32.160><c> case</c>

00:13:32.430 --> 00:13:32.440 align:start position:0%
contradicted by all of the case
 

00:13:32.440 --> 00:13:34.590 align:start position:0%
contradicted by all of the case
evidence,<00:13:32.960><c> implausible,</c><00:13:33.800><c> and</c><00:13:34.080><c> or</c><00:13:34.240><c> simply</c>

00:13:34.590 --> 00:13:34.600 align:start position:0%
evidence, implausible, and or simply
 

00:13:34.600 --> 00:13:36.270 align:start position:0%
evidence, implausible, and or simply
impossible,<00:13:35.440><c> even</c><00:13:35.680><c> if</c><00:13:35.800><c> none</c><00:13:36.040><c> of</c><00:13:36.080><c> these</c>

00:13:36.270 --> 00:13:36.280 align:start position:0%
impossible, even if none of these
 

00:13:36.280 --> 00:13:38.510 align:start position:0%
impossible, even if none of these
assertions<00:13:36.720><c> are</c><00:13:36.840><c> true.</c><00:13:37.760><c> Go</c><00:13:37.960><c> back</c><00:13:38.280><c> to</c><00:13:38.400><c> the</c>

00:13:38.510 --> 00:13:38.520 align:start position:0%
assertions are true. Go back to the
 

00:13:38.520 --> 00:13:40.870 align:start position:0%
assertions are true. Go back to the
episode<00:13:39.280><c> of</c><00:13:39.440><c> this</c><00:13:39.600><c> podcast</c><00:13:40.080><c> titled</c><00:13:40.440><c> The</c><00:13:40.560><c> Dirty</c>

00:13:40.870 --> 00:13:40.880 align:start position:0%
episode of this podcast titled The Dirty
 

00:13:40.880 --> 00:13:43.989 align:start position:0%
episode of this podcast titled The Dirty
Liars<00:13:41.760><c> to</c><00:13:42.160><c> understand</c><00:13:42.960><c> more</c><00:13:43.680><c> intimately</c>

00:13:43.989 --> 00:13:43.999 align:start position:0%
Liars to understand more intimately
 

00:13:43.999 --> 00:13:45.470 align:start position:0%
Liars to understand more intimately
[clears throat]<00:13:44.480><c> how</c><00:13:44.760><c> the</c><00:13:44.880><c> police</c><00:13:45.320><c> are</c>

00:13:45.470 --> 00:13:45.480 align:start position:0%
[clears throat] how the police are
 

00:13:45.480 --> 00:13:46.990 align:start position:0%
[clears throat] how the police are
legally<00:13:45.840><c> allowed</c><00:13:46.240><c> to</c><00:13:46.360><c> lie</c><00:13:46.520><c> to</c><00:13:46.640><c> you</c><00:13:46.760><c> about</c>

00:13:46.990 --> 00:13:47.000 align:start position:0%
legally allowed to lie to you about
 

00:13:47.000 --> 00:13:49.190 align:start position:0%
legally allowed to lie to you about
almost<00:13:47.320><c> anything,</c><00:13:48.120><c> to</c><00:13:48.240><c> any</c><00:13:48.440><c> of</c><00:13:48.560><c> us,</c><00:13:48.880><c> about</c>

00:13:49.190 --> 00:13:49.200 align:start position:0%
almost anything, to any of us, about
 

00:13:49.200 --> 00:13:52.390 align:start position:0%
almost anything, to any of us, about
almost<00:13:49.760><c> anything,</c><00:13:50.720><c> including</c><00:13:51.560><c> all</c><00:13:51.800><c> of</c><00:13:51.920><c> that.</c>

00:13:52.390 --> 00:13:52.400 align:start position:0%
almost anything, including all of that.
 

00:13:52.400 --> 00:13:54.190 align:start position:0%
almost anything, including all of that.
That's<00:13:52.680><c> why</c><00:13:52.880><c> why</c><00:13:53.120><c> would</c><00:13:53.240><c> they</c><00:13:53.400><c> ever</c><00:13:53.600><c> go,</c><00:13:53.880><c> okay,</c>

00:13:54.190 --> 00:13:54.200 align:start position:0%
That's why why would they ever go, okay,
 

00:13:54.200 --> 00:13:55.950 align:start position:0%
That's why why would they ever go, okay,
yeah,<00:13:54.320><c> let's</c><00:13:54.480><c> check</c><00:13:54.640><c> your</c><00:13:54.760><c> alibi</c><00:13:55.040><c> that</c><00:13:55.560><c> right?</c>

00:13:55.950 --> 00:13:55.960 align:start position:0%
yeah, let's check your alibi that right?
 

00:13:55.960 --> 00:13:57.390 align:start position:0%
yeah, let's check your alibi that right?
They're<00:13:56.120><c> of</c><00:13:56.240><c> course</c><00:13:56.520><c> going</c><00:13:56.760><c> to</c><00:13:56.840><c> try</c><00:13:57.000><c> to</c><00:13:57.120><c> get</c>

00:13:57.390 --> 00:13:57.400 align:start position:0%
They're of course going to try to get
 

00:13:57.400 --> 00:13:59.670 align:start position:0%
They're of course going to try to get
you<00:13:57.720><c> to</c><00:13:58.160><c> admit</c><00:13:58.440><c> that</c><00:13:58.560><c> you</c><00:13:58.640><c> did</c><00:13:58.800><c> the</c><00:13:58.840><c> crime,</c>

00:13:59.670 --> 00:13:59.680 align:start position:0%
you to admit that you did the crime,
 

00:13:59.680 --> 00:14:01.230 align:start position:0%
you to admit that you did the crime,
make<00:13:59.880><c> their</c><00:14:00.000><c> jobs</c><00:14:00.320><c> easier.</c><00:14:00.720><c> Police</c><00:14:01.000><c> are</c><00:14:01.080><c> not</c>

00:14:01.230 --> 00:14:01.240 align:start position:0%
make their jobs easier. Police are not
 

00:14:01.240 --> 00:14:02.790 align:start position:0%
make their jobs easier. Police are not
paid<00:14:01.600><c> to</c><00:14:01.760><c> prove</c><00:14:01.960><c> you</c><00:14:02.080><c> innocent.</c><00:14:02.520><c> Police</c><00:14:02.720><c> are</c>

00:14:02.790 --> 00:14:02.800 align:start position:0%
paid to prove you innocent. Police are
 

00:14:02.800 --> 00:14:03.750 align:start position:0%
paid to prove you innocent. Police are
paid<00:14:03.000><c> to</c>

00:14:03.750 --> 00:14:03.760 align:start position:0%
paid to
 

00:14:03.760 --> 00:14:05.950 align:start position:0%
paid to
paid<00:14:03.920><c> to</c><00:14:04.000><c> find</c><00:14:04.800><c> the</c><00:14:04.920><c> guilty</c><00:14:05.200><c> party,</c>

00:14:05.950 --> 00:14:05.960 align:start position:0%
paid to find the guilty party,
 

00:14:05.960 --> 00:14:07.470 align:start position:0%
paid to find the guilty party,
regardless<00:14:06.480><c> if</c><00:14:06.560><c> you're</c><00:14:06.680><c> guilty</c><00:14:06.960><c> or</c><00:14:07.040><c> not.</c>

00:14:07.470 --> 00:14:07.480 align:start position:0%
regardless if you're guilty or not.
 

00:14:07.480 --> 00:14:09.510 align:start position:0%
regardless if you're guilty or not.
Innocent<00:14:07.880><c> suspects</c><00:14:08.720><c> are</c><00:14:08.840><c> more</c><00:14:09.080><c> likely</c><00:14:09.360><c> to</c>

00:14:09.510 --> 00:14:09.520 align:start position:0%
Innocent suspects are more likely to
 

00:14:09.520 --> 00:14:11.310 align:start position:0%
Innocent suspects are more likely to
waive<00:14:09.920><c> their</c><00:14:10.080><c> Miranda</c><00:14:10.520><c> rights</c><00:14:10.880><c> and</c><00:14:11.040><c> talk</c><00:14:11.240><c> to</c>

00:14:11.310 --> 00:14:11.320 align:start position:0%
waive their Miranda rights and talk to
 

00:14:11.320 --> 00:14:14.070 align:start position:0%
waive their Miranda rights and talk to
investigators.<00:14:12.280><c> They</c><00:14:12.480><c> believe,</c><00:14:13.160><c> wrongly,</c>

00:14:14.070 --> 00:14:14.080 align:start position:0%
investigators. They believe, wrongly,
 

00:14:14.080 --> 00:14:15.870 align:start position:0%
investigators. They believe, wrongly,
that<00:14:14.280><c> their</c><00:14:14.440><c> innocence</c><00:14:14.880><c> will</c><00:14:15.000><c> be</c><00:14:15.240><c> obvious</c><00:14:15.720><c> to</c>

00:14:15.870 --> 00:14:15.880 align:start position:0%
that their innocence will be obvious to
 

00:14:15.880 --> 00:14:17.950 align:start position:0%
that their innocence will be obvious to
the<00:14:16.000><c> investigators,</c><00:14:17.000><c> and</c><00:14:17.280><c> this</c><00:14:17.520><c> same</c>

00:14:17.950 --> 00:14:17.960 align:start position:0%
the investigators, and this same
 

00:14:17.960 --> 00:14:20.910 align:start position:0%
the investigators, and this same
illusory<00:14:18.720><c> aura</c><00:14:19.200><c> of</c><00:14:19.560><c> innocence</c><00:14:20.440><c> may</c><00:14:20.640><c> also</c>

00:14:20.910 --> 00:14:20.920 align:start position:0%
illusory aura of innocence may also
 

00:14:20.920 --> 00:14:23.590 align:start position:0%
illusory aura of innocence may also
affect<00:14:21.320><c> alibi</c><00:14:21.720><c> witnesses</c><00:14:22.400><c> who</c><00:14:22.520><c> expect</c><00:14:23.480><c> that</c>

00:14:23.590 --> 00:14:23.600 align:start position:0%
affect alibi witnesses who expect that
 

00:14:23.600 --> 00:14:24.990 align:start position:0%
affect alibi witnesses who expect that
the<00:14:23.680><c> truth</c><00:14:23.960><c> of</c><00:14:24.040><c> their</c><00:14:24.200><c> testimony</c><00:14:24.720><c> will</c><00:14:24.840><c> be</c>

00:14:24.990 --> 00:14:25.000 align:start position:0%
the truth of their testimony will be
 

00:14:25.000 --> 00:14:26.470 align:start position:0%
the truth of their testimony will be
obvious<00:14:25.360><c> to</c><00:14:25.480><c> investigators</c><00:14:26.080><c> and</c><00:14:26.200><c> may</c><00:14:26.360><c> be</c>

00:14:26.470 --> 00:14:26.480 align:start position:0%
obvious to investigators and may be
 

00:14:26.480 --> 00:14:29.030 align:start position:0%
obvious to investigators and may be
surprised<00:14:27.200><c> when</c><00:14:27.360><c> it</c><00:14:27.520><c> is</c><00:14:27.640><c> not.</c><00:14:28.560><c> Do</c><00:14:28.640><c> you</c><00:14:28.720><c> see</c><00:14:28.880><c> how</c>

00:14:29.030 --> 00:14:29.040 align:start position:0%
surprised when it is not. Do you see how
 

00:14:29.040 --> 00:14:31.070 align:start position:0%
surprised when it is not. Do you see how
alibis<00:14:29.440><c> are</c><00:14:29.800><c> are</c><00:14:29.960><c> a</c><00:14:30.000><c> bit</c><00:14:30.200><c> of</c><00:14:30.320><c> a</c><00:14:30.600><c> booby</c><00:14:30.800><c> trap</c>

00:14:31.070 --> 00:14:31.080 align:start position:0%
alibis are are a bit of a booby trap
 

00:14:31.080 --> 00:14:32.710 align:start position:0%
alibis are are a bit of a booby trap
here?<00:14:31.520><c> We</c><00:14:31.680><c> also</c><00:14:31.880><c> have</c><00:14:32.000><c> an</c><00:14:32.040><c> episode</c><00:14:32.360><c> on</c><00:14:32.520><c> booby</c>

00:14:32.710 --> 00:14:32.720 align:start position:0%
here? We also have an episode on booby
 

00:14:32.720 --> 00:14:34.870 align:start position:0%
here? We also have an episode on booby
traps.<00:14:33.440><c> We</c><00:14:33.480><c> have</c><00:14:33.600><c> an</c><00:14:33.680><c> episode</c><00:14:33.880><c> on</c><00:14:34.000><c> anything</c>

00:14:34.870 --> 00:14:34.880 align:start position:0%
traps. We have an episode on anything
 

00:14:34.880 --> 00:14:36.430 align:start position:0%
traps. We have an episode on anything
and<00:14:35.040><c> everything,</c><00:14:35.400><c> don't</c><00:14:35.640><c> we?</c><00:14:36.000><c> We're</c><00:14:36.120><c> getting</c>

00:14:36.430 --> 00:14:36.440 align:start position:0%
and everything, don't we? We're getting
 

00:14:36.440 --> 00:14:38.590 align:start position:0%
and everything, don't we? We're getting
up<00:14:36.560><c> there,</c><00:14:36.760><c> man.</c><00:14:37.280><c> An</c><00:14:37.440><c> innocent</c><00:14:37.800><c> suspect</c><00:14:38.320><c> may</c>

00:14:38.590 --> 00:14:38.600 align:start position:0%
up there, man. An innocent suspect may
 

00:14:38.600 --> 00:14:40.470 align:start position:0%
up there, man. An innocent suspect may
also<00:14:38.920><c> likely</c><00:14:39.360><c> have</c><00:14:39.520><c> no</c><00:14:39.680><c> experience</c><00:14:40.280><c> with</c><00:14:40.440><c> a</c>

00:14:40.470 --> 00:14:40.480 align:start position:0%
also likely have no experience with a
 

00:14:40.480 --> 00:14:42.350 align:start position:0%
also likely have no experience with a
serious<00:14:40.880><c> felony</c><00:14:41.280><c> investigation</c><00:14:42.120><c> and</c><00:14:42.240><c> is</c>

00:14:42.350 --> 00:14:42.360 align:start position:0%
serious felony investigation and is
 

00:14:42.360 --> 00:14:44.110 align:start position:0%
serious felony investigation and is
likely<00:14:42.680><c> to</c><00:14:42.760><c> be</c><00:14:42.880><c> unfamiliar</c><00:14:43.560><c> with</c><00:14:43.720><c> techniques</c>

00:14:44.110 --> 00:14:44.120 align:start position:0%
likely to be unfamiliar with techniques
 

00:14:44.120 --> 00:14:46.110 align:start position:0%
likely to be unfamiliar with techniques
used<00:14:44.320><c> by</c><00:14:44.440><c> police</c><00:14:44.800><c> to</c><00:14:44.920><c> obtain</c><00:14:45.240><c> admissions</c><00:14:45.880><c> and</c>

00:14:46.110 --> 00:14:46.120 align:start position:0%
used by police to obtain admissions and
 

00:14:46.120 --> 00:14:48.710 align:start position:0%
used by police to obtain admissions and
confessions<00:14:46.760><c> like</c><00:14:47.320><c> lying</c><00:14:47.839><c> to</c><00:14:48.000><c> them.</c><00:14:48.480><c> If</c><00:14:48.600><c> you</c>

00:14:48.710 --> 00:14:48.720 align:start position:0%
confessions like lying to them. If you
 

00:14:48.720 --> 00:14:50.190 align:start position:0%
confessions like lying to them. If you
are<00:14:48.800><c> a</c><00:14:48.839><c> listener</c><00:14:49.120><c> of</c><00:14:49.200><c> this</c><00:14:49.320><c> podcast,</c><00:14:49.960><c> you</c><00:14:50.120><c> will</c>

00:14:50.190 --> 00:14:50.200 align:start position:0%
are a listener of this podcast, you will
 

00:14:50.200 --> 00:14:51.670 align:start position:0%
are a listener of this podcast, you will
not<00:14:50.400><c> be</c><00:14:50.480><c> bamboozled</c><00:14:50.920><c> by</c><00:14:51.040><c> that</c><00:14:51.360><c> because</c><00:14:51.560><c> I've</c>

00:14:51.670 --> 00:14:51.680 align:start position:0%
not be bamboozled by that because I've
 

00:14:51.680 --> 00:14:53.829 align:start position:0%
not be bamboozled by that because I've
already<00:14:51.920><c> warned</c><00:14:52.160><c> you</c><00:14:52.240><c> about</c><00:14:52.480><c> it,</c><00:14:53.080><c> right?</c><00:14:53.600><c> This</c>

00:14:53.829 --> 00:14:53.839 align:start position:0%
already warned you about it, right? This
 

00:14:53.839 --> 00:14:55.190 align:start position:0%
already warned you about it, right? This
may<00:14:53.960><c> make</c><00:14:54.120><c> the</c><00:14:54.200><c> suspect</c><00:14:54.600><c> more</c><00:14:54.760><c> anxious</c><00:14:55.120><c> to</c>

00:14:55.190 --> 00:14:55.200 align:start position:0%
may make the suspect more anxious to
 

00:14:55.200 --> 00:14:56.590 align:start position:0%
may make the suspect more anxious to
offer<00:14:55.440><c> an</c><00:14:55.520><c> alibi</c><00:14:55.839><c> without</c><00:14:56.080><c> taking</c><00:14:56.320><c> the</c><00:14:56.440><c> time</c>

00:14:56.590 --> 00:14:56.600 align:start position:0%
offer an alibi without taking the time
 

00:14:56.600 --> 00:14:58.550 align:start position:0%
offer an alibi without taking the time
to<00:14:56.720><c> verify</c><00:14:57.120><c> it.</c><00:14:57.440><c> Cotton,</c><00:14:58.000><c> an</c><00:14:58.200><c> innocent</c>

00:14:58.550 --> 00:14:58.560 align:start position:0%
to verify it. Cotton, an innocent
 

00:14:58.560 --> 00:15:00.270 align:start position:0%
to verify it. Cotton, an innocent
suspect<00:14:59.040><c> arrested</c><00:14:59.400><c> a</c><00:14:59.440><c> few</c><00:14:59.640><c> days</c><00:14:59.960><c> after</c>

00:15:00.270 --> 00:15:00.280 align:start position:0%
suspect arrested a few days after
 

00:15:00.280 --> 00:15:01.550 align:start position:0%
suspect arrested a few days after
Jennifer<00:15:00.640><c> Thompson</c><00:15:01.080><c> was</c><00:15:01.200><c> sexually</c>

00:15:01.550 --> 00:15:01.560 align:start position:0%
Jennifer Thompson was sexually
 

00:15:01.560 --> 00:15:03.630 align:start position:0%
Jennifer Thompson was sexually
assaulted,<00:15:02.320><c> confused</c><00:15:02.800><c> his</c><00:15:02.960><c> weekends</c><00:15:03.480><c> and</c>

00:15:03.630 --> 00:15:03.640 align:start position:0%
assaulted, confused his weekends and
 

00:15:03.640 --> 00:15:05.310 align:start position:0%
assaulted, confused his weekends and
gave<00:15:03.880><c> police</c><00:15:04.200><c> the</c><00:15:04.320><c> wrong</c><00:15:04.600><c> information</c><00:15:05.120><c> about</c>

00:15:05.310 --> 00:15:05.320 align:start position:0%
gave police the wrong information about
 

00:15:05.320 --> 00:15:08.430 align:start position:0%
gave police the wrong information about
where<00:15:05.480><c> he</c><00:15:05.640><c> was.</c><00:15:06.640><c> This</c><00:15:07.360><c> is</c><00:15:07.520><c> not</c><00:15:07.760><c> unusual.</c>

00:15:08.430 --> 00:15:08.440 align:start position:0%
where he was. This is not unusual.
 

00:15:08.440 --> 00:15:10.630 align:start position:0%
where he was. This is not unusual.
Innocent<00:15:08.800><c> suspects</c><00:15:09.400><c> may</c><00:15:09.600><c> not</c><00:15:10.160><c> accurately</c>

00:15:10.630 --> 00:15:10.640 align:start position:0%
Innocent suspects may not accurately
 

00:15:10.640 --> 00:15:12.950 align:start position:0%
Innocent suspects may not accurately
recall<00:15:11.120><c> where</c><00:15:11.280><c> they</c><00:15:11.440><c> were</c><00:15:11.680><c> in</c><00:15:11.800><c> the</c><00:15:11.880><c> past,</c><00:15:12.560><c> and</c>

00:15:12.950 --> 00:15:12.960 align:start position:0%
recall where they were in the past, and
 

00:15:12.960 --> 00:15:15.270 align:start position:0%
recall where they were in the past, and
do<00:15:13.160><c> you,</c><00:15:13.560><c> listening</c><00:15:13.960><c> right</c><00:15:14.160><c> now,</c><00:15:14.800><c> couldn't</c>

00:15:15.270 --> 00:15:15.280 align:start position:0%
do you, listening right now, couldn't
 

00:15:15.280 --> 00:15:18.470 align:start position:0%
do you, listening right now, couldn't
either<00:15:15.839><c> if</c><00:15:16.040><c> I</c><00:15:16.160><c> asked</c><00:15:16.520><c> you</c><00:15:17.080><c> where</c><00:15:17.400><c> you</c><00:15:17.600><c> were</c><00:15:18.120><c> 3</c>

00:15:18.470 --> 00:15:18.480 align:start position:0%
either if I asked you where you were 3
 

00:15:18.480 --> 00:15:22.710 align:start position:0%
either if I asked you where you were 3
months<00:15:18.760><c> ago</c><00:15:19.320><c> at</c><00:15:19.960><c> 11:32</c><00:15:21.000><c> a.m.?</c><00:15:22.040><c> Sure,</c><00:15:22.600><c> you</c>

00:15:22.710 --> 00:15:22.720 align:start position:0%
months ago at 11:32 a.m.? Sure, you
 

00:15:22.720 --> 00:15:24.710 align:start position:0%
months ago at 11:32 a.m.? Sure, you
could<00:15:23.280><c> through</c><00:15:23.400><c> text</c><00:15:23.640><c> messages.</c><00:15:24.200><c> Sure,</c><00:15:24.560><c> you</c>

00:15:24.710 --> 00:15:24.720 align:start position:0%
could through text messages. Sure, you
 

00:15:24.720 --> 00:15:26.710 align:start position:0%
could through text messages. Sure, you
could<00:15:25.080><c> look</c><00:15:25.240><c> through</c><00:15:25.400><c> your</c><00:15:25.560><c> emails.</c>

00:15:26.710 --> 00:15:26.720 align:start position:0%
could look through your emails.
 

00:15:26.720 --> 00:15:29.550 align:start position:0%
could look through your emails.
But<00:15:26.840><c> unless</c><00:15:27.120><c> you</c><00:15:27.280><c> have</c><00:15:27.960><c> hardcore</c><00:15:28.640><c> camera</c>

00:15:29.550 --> 00:15:29.560 align:start position:0%
But unless you have hardcore camera
 

00:15:29.560 --> 00:15:31.830 align:start position:0%
But unless you have hardcore camera
security<00:15:29.960><c> footage</c><00:15:30.760><c> pinpointing</c><00:15:31.400><c> you</c><00:15:31.640><c> in</c><00:15:31.760><c> a</c>

00:15:31.830 --> 00:15:31.840 align:start position:0%
security footage pinpointing you in a
 

00:15:31.840 --> 00:15:35.710 align:start position:0%
security footage pinpointing you in a
location<00:15:32.720><c> and</c><00:15:33.200><c> knowing</c><00:15:33.640><c> even</c><00:15:33.960><c> what</c><00:15:34.160><c> location</c>

00:15:35.710 --> 00:15:35.720 align:start position:0%
location and knowing even what location
 

00:15:35.720 --> 00:15:36.870 align:start position:0%
location and knowing even what location
what<00:15:35.880><c> location</c><00:15:36.240><c> security</c><00:15:36.480><c> footage</c><00:15:36.680><c> you</c><00:15:36.760><c> would</c>

00:15:36.870 --> 00:15:36.880 align:start position:0%
what location security footage you would
 

00:15:36.880 --> 00:15:39.030 align:start position:0%
what location security footage you would
even<00:15:37.040><c> need</c><00:15:37.160><c> to</c><00:15:37.280><c> ask</c><00:15:37.680><c> for,</c><00:15:38.240><c> it's</c><00:15:38.480><c> more</c><00:15:38.720><c> likely</c>

00:15:39.030 --> 00:15:39.040 align:start position:0%
even need to ask for, it's more likely
 

00:15:39.040 --> 00:15:41.350 align:start position:0%
even need to ask for, it's more likely
than<00:15:39.200><c> not</c><00:15:39.800><c> that</c><00:15:40.040><c> sitting</c><00:15:40.800><c> on</c><00:15:40.920><c> the</c><00:15:41.040><c> other</c><00:15:41.200><c> side</c>

00:15:41.350 --> 00:15:41.360 align:start position:0%
than not that sitting on the other side
 

00:15:41.360 --> 00:15:43.350 align:start position:0%
than not that sitting on the other side
of<00:15:41.440><c> a</c><00:15:41.480><c> table</c><00:15:42.080><c> in</c><00:15:42.160><c> front</c><00:15:42.320><c> of</c><00:15:42.400><c> the</c><00:15:42.480><c> police,</c><00:15:43.000><c> you</c>

00:15:43.350 --> 00:15:43.360 align:start position:0%
of a table in front of the police, you
 

00:15:43.360 --> 00:15:45.670 align:start position:0%
of a table in front of the police, you
would<00:15:43.720><c> tell</c><00:15:43.960><c> them</c><00:15:44.160><c> something</c><00:15:44.560><c> that</c><00:15:44.960><c> might</c><00:15:45.440><c> not</c>

00:15:45.670 --> 00:15:45.680 align:start position:0%
would tell them something that might not
 

00:15:45.680 --> 00:15:47.350 align:start position:0%
would tell them something that might not
be<00:15:45.800><c> accurate</c><00:15:46.240><c> or</c><00:15:46.440><c> you</c><00:15:46.560><c> may</c><00:15:46.760><c> say,</c><00:15:47.000><c> "Well,</c><00:15:47.240><c> I'm</c>

00:15:47.350 --> 00:15:47.360 align:start position:0%
be accurate or you may say, "Well, I'm
 

00:15:47.360 --> 00:15:49.390 align:start position:0%
be accurate or you may say, "Well, I'm
not<00:15:47.560><c> sure.</c><00:15:47.720><c> I</c><00:15:47.760><c> don't</c><00:15:47.960><c> remember."</c><00:15:48.480><c> And</c><00:15:49.080><c> instead</c>

00:15:49.390 --> 00:15:49.400 align:start position:0%
not sure. I don't remember." And instead
 

00:15:49.400 --> 00:15:51.190 align:start position:0%
not sure. I don't remember." And instead
of<00:15:49.480><c> that</c><00:15:49.680><c> being</c><00:15:49.960><c> a</c><00:15:50.040><c> neutral</c><00:15:50.520><c> answer,</c>

00:15:51.190 --> 00:15:51.200 align:start position:0%
of that being a neutral answer,
 

00:15:51.200 --> 00:15:54.150 align:start position:0%
of that being a neutral answer,
oftentimes<00:15:51.880><c> jurors</c><00:15:52.680><c> and</c><00:15:53.000><c> police</c><00:15:53.280><c> officers</c>

00:15:54.150 --> 00:15:54.160 align:start position:0%
oftentimes jurors and police officers
 

00:15:54.160 --> 00:15:56.750 align:start position:0%
oftentimes jurors and police officers
see<00:15:54.400><c> that</c><00:15:54.720><c> as</c><00:15:55.000><c> you</c><00:15:55.280><c> being</c><00:15:55.520><c> deceptive</c><00:15:56.400><c> and</c><00:15:56.640><c> you</c>

00:15:56.750 --> 00:15:56.760 align:start position:0%
see that as you being deceptive and you
 

00:15:56.760 --> 00:15:58.670 align:start position:0%
see that as you being deceptive and you
concealing<00:15:57.240><c> something</c><00:15:57.680><c> or</c><00:15:58.160><c> evidence</c>

00:15:58.670 --> 00:15:58.680 align:start position:0%
concealing something or evidence
 

00:15:58.680 --> 00:16:00.750 align:start position:0%
concealing something or evidence
supporting<00:15:59.280><c> that</c><00:15:59.400><c> you</c><00:15:59.880><c> committed</c><00:16:00.200><c> the</c><00:16:00.280><c> crime.</c>

00:16:00.750 --> 00:16:00.760 align:start position:0%
supporting that you committed the crime.
 

00:16:00.760 --> 00:16:02.710 align:start position:0%
supporting that you committed the crime.
Despite<00:16:01.080><c> the</c><00:16:01.160><c> fact</c><00:16:01.360><c> that</c><00:16:01.640><c> memory</c><00:16:02.000><c> is</c><00:16:02.120><c> elusive</c>

00:16:02.710 --> 00:16:02.720 align:start position:0%
Despite the fact that memory is elusive
 

00:16:02.720 --> 00:16:04.750 align:start position:0%
Despite the fact that memory is elusive
and<00:16:03.080><c> how</c><00:16:03.160><c> am</c><00:16:03.280><c> I</c><00:16:03.360><c> supposed</c><00:16:03.560><c> to</c><00:16:03.640><c> know</c><00:16:04.360><c> exactly</c>

00:16:04.750 --> 00:16:04.760 align:start position:0%
and how am I supposed to know exactly
 

00:16:04.760 --> 00:16:06.070 align:start position:0%
and how am I supposed to know exactly
where<00:16:04.880><c> I</c><00:16:04.920><c> was?</c><00:16:05.320><c> But</c><00:16:05.440><c> even</c><00:16:05.600><c> if</c><00:16:05.720><c> you</c><00:16:05.840><c> can</c>

00:16:06.070 --> 00:16:06.080 align:start position:0%
where I was? But even if you can
 

00:16:06.080 --> 00:16:07.590 align:start position:0%
where I was? But even if you can
remember<00:16:06.480><c> exactly</c><00:16:06.880><c> where</c><00:16:07.040><c> you</c><00:16:07.120><c> were,</c><00:16:07.280><c> even</c><00:16:07.480><c> if</c>

00:16:07.590 --> 00:16:07.600 align:start position:0%
remember exactly where you were, even if
 

00:16:07.600 --> 00:16:08.990 align:start position:0%
remember exactly where you were, even if
I<00:16:07.640><c> can</c><00:16:07.840><c> say,</c><00:16:08.040><c> "Yeah,</c><00:16:08.280><c> I</c><00:16:08.360><c> was</c><00:16:08.520><c> sitting</c><00:16:08.760><c> in</c><00:16:08.840><c> my</c>

00:16:08.990 --> 00:16:09.000 align:start position:0%
I can say, "Yeah, I was sitting in my
 

00:16:09.000 --> 00:16:11.950 align:start position:0%
I can say, "Yeah, I was sitting in my
office<00:16:10.080><c> editing</c><00:16:10.400><c> a</c><00:16:10.440><c> TikTok</c><00:16:10.880><c> video."</c><00:16:11.720><c> They</c>

00:16:11.950 --> 00:16:11.960 align:start position:0%
office editing a TikTok video." They
 

00:16:11.960 --> 00:16:13.830 align:start position:0%
office editing a TikTok video." They
would<00:16:12.200><c> say,</c><00:16:12.520><c> "Okay,</c>

00:16:13.830 --> 00:16:13.840 align:start position:0%
would say, "Okay,
 

00:16:13.840 --> 00:16:14.990 align:start position:0%
would say, "Okay,
what<00:16:14.000><c> evidence</c><00:16:14.320><c> do</c><00:16:14.360><c> you</c><00:16:14.440><c> have</c><00:16:14.560><c> to</c><00:16:14.720><c> support</c>

00:16:14.990 --> 00:16:15.000 align:start position:0%
what evidence do you have to support
 

00:16:15.000 --> 00:16:17.190 align:start position:0%
what evidence do you have to support
that?"<00:16:15.400><c> I</c><00:16:15.480><c> would</c><00:16:15.640><c> say,</c><00:16:16.240><c> "Um</c><00:16:16.840><c> hopefully</c>

00:16:17.190 --> 00:16:17.200 align:start position:0%
that?" I would say, "Um hopefully
 

00:16:17.200 --> 00:16:19.190 align:start position:0%
that?" I would say, "Um hopefully
digital<00:16:17.560><c> evidence,</c><00:16:17.960><c> but</c><00:16:18.080><c> if</c><00:16:18.240><c> not,</c><00:16:18.720><c> if</c><00:16:18.840><c> that's</c>

00:16:19.190 --> 00:16:19.200 align:start position:0%
digital evidence, but if not, if that's
 

00:16:19.200 --> 00:16:21.310 align:start position:0%
digital evidence, but if not, if that's
useless,<00:16:20.000><c> if</c><00:16:20.120><c> that</c><00:16:20.280><c> doesn't</c><00:16:20.560><c> necessarily</c>

00:16:21.310 --> 00:16:21.320 align:start position:0%
useless, if that doesn't necessarily
 

00:16:21.320 --> 00:16:23.350 align:start position:0%
useless, if that doesn't necessarily
point<00:16:21.800><c> to</c><00:16:21.920><c> me</c><00:16:22.120><c> being</c><00:16:22.400><c> somewhere</c><00:16:22.920><c> that</c><00:16:23.160><c> it</c>

00:16:23.350 --> 00:16:23.360 align:start position:0%
point to me being somewhere that it
 

00:16:23.360 --> 00:16:25.710 align:start position:0%
point to me being somewhere that it
wasn't<00:16:23.640><c> where</c><00:16:23.760><c> the</c><00:16:23.840><c> crime</c><00:16:24.120><c> scene</c><00:16:24.320><c> was,</c><00:16:25.040><c> then</c><00:16:25.640><c> I</c>

00:16:25.710 --> 00:16:25.720 align:start position:0%
wasn't where the crime scene was, then I
 

00:16:25.720 --> 00:16:27.310 align:start position:0%
wasn't where the crime scene was, then I
might<00:16:25.920><c> be</c><00:16:26.000><c> the</c><00:16:26.120><c> only</c><00:16:26.320><c> witness</c><00:16:26.760><c> to</c><00:16:26.920><c> where</c><00:16:27.240><c> I</c>

00:16:27.310 --> 00:16:27.320 align:start position:0%
might be the only witness to where I
 

00:16:27.320 --> 00:16:28.750 align:start position:0%
might be the only witness to where I
was."

00:16:28.750 --> 00:16:28.760 align:start position:0%
was."
 

00:16:28.760 --> 00:16:30.790 align:start position:0%
was."
Not<00:16:28.960><c> great.</c><00:16:29.320><c> In</c><00:16:29.520><c> one</c><00:16:29.720><c> study,</c><00:16:30.120><c> participants</c>

00:16:30.790 --> 00:16:30.800 align:start position:0%
Not great. In one study, participants
 

00:16:30.800 --> 00:16:32.510 align:start position:0%
Not great. In one study, participants
were<00:16:30.920><c> asked</c><00:16:31.360><c> to</c><00:16:31.480><c> report</c><00:16:31.800><c> their</c><00:16:31.960><c> whereabouts</c>

00:16:32.510 --> 00:16:32.520 align:start position:0%
were asked to report their whereabouts
 

00:16:32.520 --> 00:16:34.870 align:start position:0%
were asked to report their whereabouts
on<00:16:32.680><c> four</c><00:16:32.960><c> particular</c><00:16:33.480><c> times</c><00:16:33.839><c> in</c><00:16:33.960><c> the</c><00:16:34.040><c> past,</c>

00:16:34.870 --> 00:16:34.880 align:start position:0%
on four particular times in the past,
 

00:16:34.880 --> 00:16:37.030 align:start position:0%
on four particular times in the past,
then<00:16:35.200><c> given</c><00:16:35.520><c> 48</c><00:16:35.960><c> hours</c><00:16:36.280><c> to</c><00:16:36.440><c> return</c><00:16:36.880><c> with</c>

00:16:37.030 --> 00:16:37.040 align:start position:0%
then given 48 hours to return with
 

00:16:37.040 --> 00:16:38.829 align:start position:0%
then given 48 hours to return with
evidence<00:16:37.440><c> of</c><00:16:37.560><c> their</c><00:16:37.720><c> whereabouts.</c><00:16:38.400><c> In</c><00:16:38.560><c> this</c>

00:16:38.829 --> 00:16:38.839 align:start position:0%
evidence of their whereabouts. In this
 

00:16:38.839 --> 00:16:42.070 align:start position:0%
evidence of their whereabouts. In this
low-stress,<00:16:39.680><c> low-stakes</c><00:16:40.440><c> test,</c><00:16:40.880><c> over</c><00:16:41.200><c> 1/3,</c>

00:16:42.070 --> 00:16:42.080 align:start position:0%
low-stress, low-stakes test, over 1/3,
 

00:16:42.080 --> 00:16:45.030 align:start position:0%
low-stress, low-stakes test, over 1/3,
36.4%,<00:16:43.480><c> were</c><00:16:43.680><c> wrong</c><00:16:44.440><c> about</c><00:16:44.680><c> where</c><00:16:44.800><c> they</c><00:16:44.920><c> had</c>

00:16:45.030 --> 00:16:45.040 align:start position:0%
36.4%, were wrong about where they had
 

00:16:45.040 --> 00:16:47.630 align:start position:0%
36.4%, were wrong about where they had
been.<00:16:45.520><c> Yet</c><00:16:45.720><c> if</c><00:16:45.880><c> a</c><00:16:45.920><c> suspect</c><00:16:46.680><c> in</c><00:16:46.800><c> a</c><00:16:46.880><c> high-stress,</c>

00:16:47.630 --> 00:16:47.640 align:start position:0%
been. Yet if a suspect in a high-stress,
 

00:16:47.640 --> 00:16:49.550 align:start position:0%
been. Yet if a suspect in a high-stress,
high-stakes<00:16:48.400><c> interrogation</c><00:16:49.000><c> room</c><00:16:49.160><c> setting</c>

00:16:49.550 --> 00:16:49.560 align:start position:0%
high-stakes interrogation room setting
 

00:16:49.560 --> 00:16:50.950 align:start position:0%
high-stakes interrogation room setting
provides<00:16:50.000><c> wrong</c><00:16:50.280><c> information,</c><00:16:50.800><c> law</c>

00:16:50.950 --> 00:16:50.960 align:start position:0%
provides wrong information, law
 

00:16:50.960 --> 00:16:53.230 align:start position:0%
provides wrong information, law
enforcement<00:16:51.560><c> officers</c><00:16:52.240><c> see</c><00:16:52.480><c> this</c><00:16:52.880><c> as</c><00:16:53.120><c> a</c>

00:16:53.230 --> 00:16:53.240 align:start position:0%
enforcement officers see this as a
 

00:16:53.240 --> 00:16:55.829 align:start position:0%
enforcement officers see this as a
deliberate<00:16:54.000><c> lie</c><00:16:54.440><c> and</c><00:16:54.600><c> as</c><00:16:54.760><c> evidence</c><00:16:55.120><c> of</c><00:16:55.240><c> guilt.</c>

00:16:55.829 --> 00:16:55.839 align:start position:0%
deliberate lie and as evidence of guilt.
 

00:16:55.839 --> 00:16:58.150 align:start position:0%
deliberate lie and as evidence of guilt.
They<00:16:55.960><c> shouldn't,</c><00:16:56.640><c> but</c><00:16:56.880><c> they</c><00:16:57.040><c> do.</c><00:16:57.600><c> Cotton,</c>

00:16:58.150 --> 00:16:58.160 align:start position:0%
They shouldn't, but they do. Cotton,
 

00:16:58.160 --> 00:17:00.710 align:start position:0%
They shouldn't, but they do. Cotton,
like<00:16:58.440><c> other</c><00:16:58.600><c> witnesses</c><00:16:59.320><c> and</c><00:16:59.640><c> like</c><00:16:59.920><c> you,</c><00:17:00.480><c> my</c>

00:17:00.710 --> 00:17:00.720 align:start position:0%
like other witnesses and like you, my
 

00:17:00.720 --> 00:17:03.150 align:start position:0%
like other witnesses and like you, my
listener<00:17:01.200><c> or</c><00:17:01.400><c> watcher</c><00:17:01.839><c> right</c><00:17:02.120><c> now,</c><00:17:02.800><c> may</c><00:17:02.960><c> have</c>

00:17:03.150 --> 00:17:03.160 align:start position:0%
listener or watcher right now, may have
 

00:17:03.160 --> 00:17:05.710 align:start position:0%
listener or watcher right now, may have
relied<00:17:03.640><c> on</c><00:17:03.760><c> a</c><00:17:03.839><c> schema</c><00:17:04.640><c> to</c><00:17:04.800><c> generate</c><00:17:05.319><c> this</c>

00:17:05.710 --> 00:17:05.720 align:start position:0%
relied on a schema to generate this
 

00:17:05.720 --> 00:17:08.550 align:start position:0%
relied on a schema to generate this
alibi.<00:17:06.640><c> He</c><00:17:06.839><c> recalled</c><00:17:07.360><c> what</c><00:17:07.480><c> he</c><00:17:07.640><c> habitually</c>

00:17:08.550 --> 00:17:08.560 align:start position:0%
alibi. He recalled what he habitually
 

00:17:08.560 --> 00:17:10.350 align:start position:0%
alibi. He recalled what he habitually
did<00:17:08.959><c> at</c><00:17:09.079><c> that</c><00:17:09.319><c> time</c><00:17:09.520><c> on</c><00:17:09.640><c> a</c><00:17:09.680><c> weekend</c><00:17:10.120><c> rather</c>

00:17:10.350 --> 00:17:10.360 align:start position:0%
did at that time on a weekend rather
 

00:17:10.360 --> 00:17:12.230 align:start position:0%
did at that time on a weekend rather
than<00:17:10.480><c> recalling</c><00:17:10.959><c> specifically</c><00:17:11.680><c> what</c><00:17:11.839><c> he</c><00:17:12.000><c> did</c>

00:17:12.230 --> 00:17:12.240 align:start position:0%
than recalling specifically what he did
 

00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:14.429 align:start position:0%
than recalling specifically what he did
on<00:17:12.360><c> that</c><00:17:12.520><c> particular</c><00:17:13.000><c> day.</c><00:17:13.560><c> If</c><00:17:13.760><c> he</c><00:17:13.880><c> in</c><00:17:14.000><c> fact</c>

00:17:14.429 --> 00:17:14.439 align:start position:0%
on that particular day. If he in fact
 

00:17:14.439 --> 00:17:16.150 align:start position:0%
on that particular day. If he in fact
did<00:17:14.600><c> what</c><00:17:14.680><c> he</c><00:17:14.800><c> usually</c><00:17:15.160><c> did,</c><00:17:15.480><c> the</c><00:17:15.600><c> alibi</c><00:17:15.959><c> would</c>

00:17:16.150 --> 00:17:16.160 align:start position:0%
did what he usually did, the alibi would
 

00:17:16.160 --> 00:17:18.390 align:start position:0%
did what he usually did, the alibi would
be<00:17:16.280><c> reliable,</c><00:17:17.120><c> but</c><00:17:17.760><c> if</c><00:17:17.880><c> he</c><00:17:17.959><c> did</c><00:17:18.120><c> something</c>

00:17:18.390 --> 00:17:18.400 align:start position:0%
be reliable, but if he did something
 

00:17:18.400 --> 00:17:20.590 align:start position:0%
be reliable, but if he did something
different<00:17:19.280><c> and</c><00:17:19.400><c> had</c><00:17:19.560><c> forgotten</c><00:17:20.199><c> that</c><00:17:20.360><c> he</c><00:17:20.480><c> had</c>

00:17:20.590 --> 00:17:20.600 align:start position:0%
different and had forgotten that he had
 

00:17:20.600 --> 00:17:22.870 align:start position:0%
different and had forgotten that he had
deviated<00:17:21.199><c> from</c><00:17:21.400><c> his</c><00:17:21.640><c> normal</c><00:17:21.920><c> routine,</c><00:17:22.760><c> then</c>

00:17:22.870 --> 00:17:22.880 align:start position:0%
deviated from his normal routine, then
 

00:17:22.880 --> 00:17:25.030 align:start position:0%
deviated from his normal routine, then
the<00:17:23.000><c> alibi</c><00:17:23.600><c> would</c><00:17:23.800><c> not</c><00:17:24.160><c> be</c><00:17:24.319><c> accurate.</c><00:17:24.920><c> And</c>

00:17:25.030 --> 00:17:25.040 align:start position:0%
the alibi would not be accurate. And
 

00:17:25.040 --> 00:17:27.230 align:start position:0%
the alibi would not be accurate. And
when<00:17:25.199><c> police</c><00:17:25.640><c> are</c><00:17:25.800><c> unable</c><00:17:26.120><c> to</c><00:17:26.199><c> verify</c><00:17:26.680><c> it,</c><00:17:27.160><c> the</c>

00:17:27.230 --> 00:17:27.240 align:start position:0%
when police are unable to verify it, the
 

00:17:27.240 --> 00:17:29.390 align:start position:0%
when police are unable to verify it, the
suspect<00:17:28.079><c> looks</c><00:17:28.319><c> guilty.</c><00:17:28.880><c> As</c><00:17:29.120><c> noted</c>

00:17:29.390 --> 00:17:29.400 align:start position:0%
suspect looks guilty. As noted
 

00:17:29.400 --> 00:17:31.390 align:start position:0%
suspect looks guilty. As noted
previously,<00:17:30.000><c> acquaintances</c><00:17:30.640><c> and</c><00:17:30.880><c> strangers</c>

00:17:31.390 --> 00:17:31.400 align:start position:0%
previously, acquaintances and strangers
 

00:17:31.400 --> 00:17:33.070 align:start position:0%
previously, acquaintances and strangers
may<00:17:31.520><c> not</c><00:17:31.760><c> recall</c><00:17:32.320><c> interacting</c><00:17:32.880><c> with</c><00:17:33.000><c> the</c>

00:17:33.070 --> 00:17:33.080 align:start position:0%
may not recall interacting with the
 

00:17:33.080 --> 00:17:34.270 align:start position:0%
may not recall interacting with the
defendant.<00:17:33.680><c> If</c><00:17:33.760><c> the</c><00:17:33.840><c> defendant</c>

00:17:34.270 --> 00:17:34.280 align:start position:0%
defendant. If the defendant
 

00:17:34.280 --> 00:17:36.030 align:start position:0%
defendant. If the defendant
overconfidently<00:17:35.080><c> assumes</c><00:17:35.520><c> that</c><00:17:35.640><c> the</c><00:17:35.720><c> witness</c>

00:17:36.030 --> 00:17:36.040 align:start position:0%
overconfidently assumes that the witness
 

00:17:36.040 --> 00:17:38.590 align:start position:0%
overconfidently assumes that the witness
will<00:17:36.160><c> do</c><00:17:36.360><c> so,</c><00:17:36.680><c> then</c><00:17:36.840><c> he</c><00:17:37.120><c> or</c><00:17:37.280><c> she</c><00:17:37.560><c> may</c><00:17:37.800><c> suggest</c>

00:17:38.590 --> 00:17:38.600 align:start position:0%
will do so, then he or she may suggest
 

00:17:38.600 --> 00:17:40.750 align:start position:0%
will do so, then he or she may suggest
alibi<00:17:38.960><c> witnesses</c><00:17:39.400><c> who</c><00:17:39.520><c> don't</c><00:17:39.800><c> recall</c><00:17:40.160><c> them</c>

00:17:40.750 --> 00:17:40.760 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses who don't recall them
 

00:17:40.760 --> 00:17:42.790 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses who don't recall them
when<00:17:41.040><c> contacted</c><00:17:41.600><c> by</c><00:17:41.760><c> an</c><00:17:41.880><c> investigator,</c>

00:17:42.790 --> 00:17:42.800 align:start position:0%
when contacted by an investigator,
 

00:17:42.800 --> 00:17:45.230 align:start position:0%
when contacted by an investigator,
further<00:17:43.120><c> heightening</c><00:17:43.640><c> the</c><00:17:43.760><c> doubt</c><00:17:44.480><c> around</c><00:17:45.160><c> the</c>

00:17:45.230 --> 00:17:45.240 align:start position:0%
further heightening the doubt around the
 

00:17:45.240 --> 00:17:47.630 align:start position:0%
further heightening the doubt around the
defendant's<00:17:46.160><c> truthfulness.</c><00:17:46.960><c> Despite</c><00:17:47.560><c> the</c>

00:17:47.630 --> 00:17:47.640 align:start position:0%
defendant's truthfulness. Despite the
 

00:17:47.640 --> 00:17:49.670 align:start position:0%
defendant's truthfulness. Despite the
fact<00:17:47.880><c> they</c><00:17:48.120><c> probably</c><00:17:48.720><c> were</c><00:17:48.880><c> truthful</c><00:17:49.320><c> or</c><00:17:49.440><c> may</c>

00:17:49.670 --> 00:17:49.680 align:start position:0%
fact they probably were truthful or may
 

00:17:49.680 --> 00:17:51.150 align:start position:0%
fact they probably were truthful or may
have<00:17:49.840><c> been</c><00:17:49.960><c> truthful,</c><00:17:50.400><c> but</c><00:17:50.680><c> the</c><00:17:50.760><c> witness</c><00:17:51.000><c> just</c>

00:17:51.150 --> 00:17:51.160 align:start position:0%
have been truthful, but the witness just
 

00:17:51.160 --> 00:17:53.110 align:start position:0%
have been truthful, but the witness just
didn't<00:17:51.400><c> remember.</c><00:17:52.240><c> It</c><00:17:52.400><c> should</c><00:17:52.600><c> be</c><00:17:52.720><c> a</c><00:17:52.760><c> neutral</c>

00:17:53.110 --> 00:17:53.120 align:start position:0%
didn't remember. It should be a neutral
 

00:17:53.120 --> 00:17:55.590 align:start position:0%
didn't remember. It should be a neutral
fact,<00:17:53.480><c> but</c><00:17:53.600><c> it</c><00:17:54.040><c> so</c><00:17:54.320><c> often</c><00:17:54.680><c> isn't.</c><00:17:55.240><c> A</c><00:17:55.280><c> study</c>

00:17:55.590 --> 00:17:55.600 align:start position:0%
fact, but it so often isn't. A study
 

00:17:55.600 --> 00:17:57.790 align:start position:0%
fact, but it so often isn't. A study
from<00:17:55.760><c> the</c><00:17:55.840><c> year</c><00:17:56.000><c> 2000</c><00:17:56.760><c> concluded</c><00:17:57.280><c> that</c><00:17:57.440><c> people</c>

00:17:57.790 --> 00:17:57.800 align:start position:0%
from the year 2000 concluded that people
 

00:17:57.800 --> 00:18:00.030 align:start position:0%
from the year 2000 concluded that people
often<00:17:58.160><c> overestimate</c><00:17:58.800><c> the</c><00:17:58.920><c> extent</c><00:17:59.600><c> to</c><00:17:59.720><c> which</c>

00:18:00.030 --> 00:18:00.040 align:start position:0%
often overestimate the extent to which
 

00:18:00.040 --> 00:18:02.190 align:start position:0%
often overestimate the extent to which
others<00:18:00.560><c> notice</c><00:18:01.040><c> them.</c><00:18:01.600><c> Another</c><00:18:01.880><c> study</c><00:18:02.080><c> from</c>

00:18:02.190 --> 00:18:02.200 align:start position:0%
others notice them. Another study from
 

00:18:02.200 --> 00:18:05.310 align:start position:0%
others notice them. Another study from
2004<00:18:02.960><c> discussed</c><00:18:03.560><c> relatively</c><00:18:04.200><c> poor</c><00:18:04.960><c> witness</c>

00:18:05.310 --> 00:18:05.320 align:start position:0%
2004 discussed relatively poor witness
 

00:18:05.320 --> 00:18:07.510 align:start position:0%
2004 discussed relatively poor witness
performance,<00:18:06.000><c> identifying</c><00:18:06.560><c> a</c><00:18:06.640><c> person</c><00:18:07.320><c> they</c>

00:18:07.510 --> 00:18:07.520 align:start position:0%
performance, identifying a person they
 

00:18:07.520 --> 00:18:10.470 align:start position:0%
performance, identifying a person they
briefly<00:18:08.240><c> interacted</c><00:18:08.840><c> with</c><00:18:09.480><c> just</c><00:18:09.800><c> 4</c><00:18:10.120><c> hours</c>

00:18:10.470 --> 00:18:10.480 align:start position:0%
briefly interacted with just 4 hours
 

00:18:10.480 --> 00:18:12.350 align:start position:0%
briefly interacted with just 4 hours
earlier.<00:18:11.080><c> If</c><00:18:11.240><c> the</c><00:18:11.360><c> alibi</c><00:18:11.680><c> witness</c><00:18:12.000><c> fails</c><00:18:12.280><c> to</c>

00:18:12.350 --> 00:18:12.360 align:start position:0%
earlier. If the alibi witness fails to
 

00:18:12.360 --> 00:18:14.030 align:start position:0%
earlier. If the alibi witness fails to
remember<00:18:12.680><c> a</c><00:18:12.720><c> defendant</c><00:18:13.240><c> when</c><00:18:13.400><c> questioned,</c>

00:18:14.030 --> 00:18:14.040 align:start position:0%
remember a defendant when questioned,
 

00:18:14.040 --> 00:18:15.750 align:start position:0%
remember a defendant when questioned,
then<00:18:14.280><c> the</c><00:18:14.440><c> investigator</c><00:18:15.280><c> may</c><00:18:15.320><c> assume</c><00:18:15.640><c> that</c>

00:18:15.750 --> 00:18:15.760 align:start position:0%
then the investigator may assume that
 

00:18:15.760 --> 00:18:17.430 align:start position:0%
then the investigator may assume that
the<00:18:15.840><c> defendant</c><00:18:16.320><c> lied</c><00:18:16.520><c> to</c><00:18:16.640><c> them</c><00:18:16.960><c> and</c><00:18:17.280><c> is</c>

00:18:17.430 --> 00:18:17.440 align:start position:0%
the defendant lied to them and is
 

00:18:17.440 --> 00:18:19.990 align:start position:0%
the defendant lied to them and is
guilty.<00:18:18.000><c> The</c><00:18:18.080><c> consequences</c><00:18:19.000><c> of</c><00:18:19.360><c> good</c><00:18:19.640><c> faith</c>

00:18:19.990 --> 00:18:20.000 align:start position:0%
guilty. The consequences of good faith
 

00:18:20.000 --> 00:18:22.870 align:start position:0%
guilty. The consequences of good faith
mistakes<00:18:20.680><c> are</c><00:18:21.200><c> unfortunately</c><00:18:21.880><c> very</c><00:18:22.200><c> serious.</c>

00:18:22.870 --> 00:18:22.880 align:start position:0%
mistakes are unfortunately very serious.
 

00:18:22.880 --> 00:18:24.590 align:start position:0%
mistakes are unfortunately very serious.
Once<00:18:23.080><c> a</c><00:18:23.120><c> defendant</c><00:18:23.480><c> makes</c><00:18:23.640><c> a</c><00:18:23.680><c> mistake,</c><00:18:24.360><c> it</c><00:18:24.480><c> may</c>

00:18:24.590 --> 00:18:24.600 align:start position:0%
Once a defendant makes a mistake, it may
 

00:18:24.600 --> 00:18:27.030 align:start position:0%
Once a defendant makes a mistake, it may
be<00:18:24.760><c> near</c><00:18:25.080><c> impossible</c><00:18:26.000><c> for</c><00:18:26.160><c> them</c><00:18:26.440><c> to</c><00:18:26.600><c> convince</c>

00:18:27.030 --> 00:18:27.040 align:start position:0%
be near impossible for them to convince
 

00:18:27.040 --> 00:18:29.790 align:start position:0%
be near impossible for them to convince
anyone<00:18:27.560><c> of</c><00:18:27.720><c> their</c><00:18:27.920><c> innocence.</c><00:18:28.680><c> Changes,</c><00:18:29.440><c> even</c>

00:18:29.790 --> 00:18:29.800 align:start position:0%
anyone of their innocence. Changes, even
 

00:18:29.800 --> 00:18:31.870 align:start position:0%
anyone of their innocence. Changes, even
changes<00:18:30.240><c> that</c><00:18:30.440><c> genuinely</c><00:18:31.200><c> strengthen</c><00:18:31.720><c> the</c>

00:18:31.870 --> 00:18:31.880 align:start position:0%
changes that genuinely strengthen the
 

00:18:31.880 --> 00:18:35.070 align:start position:0%
changes that genuinely strengthen the
alibi,<00:18:32.800><c> tend</c><00:18:33.120><c> to</c><00:18:33.320><c> weaken</c><00:18:34.200><c> how</c><00:18:34.480><c> jurors</c>

00:18:35.070 --> 00:18:35.080 align:start position:0%
alibi, tend to weaken how jurors
 

00:18:35.080 --> 00:18:38.150 align:start position:0%
alibi, tend to weaken how jurors
perceive<00:18:35.600><c> it.</c><00:18:36.400><c> Crazy</c><00:18:36.920><c> town.</c><00:18:37.360><c> It's</c><00:18:37.560><c> not</c><00:18:37.800><c> crazy</c>

00:18:38.150 --> 00:18:38.160 align:start position:0%
perceive it. Crazy town. It's not crazy
 

00:18:38.160 --> 00:18:39.830 align:start position:0%
perceive it. Crazy town. It's not crazy
when<00:18:38.320><c> you</c><00:18:38.400><c> really</c><00:18:38.600><c> think</c><00:18:38.760><c> about</c><00:18:39.000><c> it,</c><00:18:39.280><c> but</c><00:18:39.760><c> I</c>

00:18:39.830 --> 00:18:39.840 align:start position:0%
when you really think about it, but I
 

00:18:39.840 --> 00:18:41.190 align:start position:0%
when you really think about it, but I
think<00:18:40.120><c> that</c><00:18:40.320><c> the</c><00:18:40.440><c> myth</c><00:18:40.680><c> of</c><00:18:40.760><c> the</c><00:18:40.880><c> alibi</c>

00:18:41.190 --> 00:18:41.200 align:start position:0%
think that the myth of the alibi
 

00:18:41.200 --> 00:18:44.630 align:start position:0%
think that the myth of the alibi
statement<00:18:42.120><c> being</c><00:18:42.520><c> so</c><00:18:43.520><c> jarring</c><00:18:44.080><c> to</c><00:18:44.200><c> hear,</c>

00:18:44.630 --> 00:18:44.640 align:start position:0%
statement being so jarring to hear,
 

00:18:44.640 --> 00:18:47.230 align:start position:0%
statement being so jarring to hear,
right?<00:18:45.160><c> do</c><00:18:45.240><c> you</c><00:18:45.320><c> mean?</c><00:18:46.320><c> You're</c><00:18:46.760><c> putting</c><00:18:47.080><c> on</c>

00:18:47.230 --> 00:18:47.240 align:start position:0%
right? do you mean? You're putting on
 

00:18:47.240 --> 00:18:49.670 align:start position:0%
right? do you mean? You're putting on
proof<00:18:48.360><c> of</c><00:18:48.520><c> you</c><00:18:48.720><c> being</c><00:18:49.080><c> at</c><00:18:49.240><c> a</c><00:18:49.320><c> different</c>

00:18:49.670 --> 00:18:49.680 align:start position:0%
proof of you being at a different
 

00:18:49.680 --> 00:18:51.790 align:start position:0%
proof of you being at a different
location<00:18:50.120><c> from</c><00:18:50.280><c> where</c><00:18:50.440><c> the</c><00:18:50.520><c> crime</c><00:18:50.800><c> occurred,</c>

00:18:51.790 --> 00:18:51.800 align:start position:0%
location from where the crime occurred,
 

00:18:51.800 --> 00:18:54.110 align:start position:0%
location from where the crime occurred,
yet<00:18:52.560><c> pretty</c><00:18:52.840><c> much</c><00:18:53.160><c> everything,</c><00:18:53.800><c> all</c><00:18:53.960><c> of</c><00:18:54.040><c> the</c>

00:18:54.110 --> 00:18:54.120 align:start position:0%
yet pretty much everything, all of the
 

00:18:54.120 --> 00:18:55.990 align:start position:0%
yet pretty much everything, all of the
empirical<00:18:54.520><c> evidence,</c><00:18:54.920><c> points</c><00:18:55.360><c> to</c><00:18:55.480><c> the</c><00:18:55.600><c> fact</c>

00:18:55.990 --> 00:18:56.000 align:start position:0%
empirical evidence, points to the fact
 

00:18:56.000 --> 00:18:57.150 align:start position:0%
empirical evidence, points to the fact
that,<00:18:56.240><c> "Hey,</c><00:18:56.440><c> you</c><00:18:56.560><c> should</c><00:18:56.680><c> probably</c><00:18:56.920><c> just</c><00:18:57.040><c> let</c>

00:18:57.150 --> 00:18:57.160 align:start position:0%
that, "Hey, you should probably just let
 

00:18:57.160 --> 00:18:59.470 align:start position:0%
that, "Hey, you should probably just let
the<00:18:57.240><c> prosecution</c><00:18:58.120><c> be</c><00:18:58.280><c> forced</c><00:18:58.680><c> to</c><00:18:59.000><c> prove</c><00:18:59.320><c> their</c>

00:18:59.470 --> 00:18:59.480 align:start position:0%
the prosecution be forced to prove their
 

00:18:59.480 --> 00:19:00.870 align:start position:0%
the prosecution be forced to prove their
burden<00:18:59.840><c> beyond</c><00:19:00.040><c> a</c><00:19:00.080><c> reasonable</c><00:19:00.400><c> doubt</c><00:19:00.720><c> and</c>

00:19:00.870 --> 00:19:00.880 align:start position:0%
burden beyond a reasonable doubt and
 

00:19:00.880 --> 00:19:02.710 align:start position:0%
burden beyond a reasonable doubt and
just<00:19:01.120><c> shut</c><00:19:01.360><c> your</c><00:19:01.480><c> trap."</c><00:19:01.960><c> Human</c><00:19:02.240><c> nature</c><00:19:02.520><c> is</c>

00:19:02.710 --> 00:19:02.720 align:start position:0%
just shut your trap." Human nature is
 

00:19:02.720 --> 00:19:04.630 align:start position:0%
just shut your trap." Human nature is
odd,<00:19:03.040><c> isn't</c><00:19:03.280><c> it?</c><00:19:03.600><c> And</c><00:19:03.720><c> human</c><00:19:03.960><c> perception</c><00:19:04.440><c> is</c>

00:19:04.630 --> 00:19:04.640 align:start position:0%
odd, isn't it? And human perception is
 

00:19:04.640 --> 00:19:06.910 align:start position:0%
odd, isn't it? And human perception is
odd.<00:19:05.160><c> If</c><00:19:05.320><c> a</c><00:19:05.400><c> suspect</c><00:19:05.920><c> hesitates,</c><00:19:06.520><c> however,</c>

00:19:06.910 --> 00:19:06.920 align:start position:0%
odd. If a suspect hesitates, however,
 

00:19:06.920 --> 00:19:08.350 align:start position:0%
odd. If a suspect hesitates, however,
let's<00:19:07.120><c> say</c><00:19:07.280><c> across</c><00:19:07.640><c> the</c><00:19:07.760><c> interrogation</c>

00:19:08.350 --> 00:19:08.360 align:start position:0%
let's say across the interrogation
 

00:19:08.360 --> 00:19:10.310 align:start position:0%
let's say across the interrogation
table,<00:19:08.880><c> wanting</c><00:19:09.240><c> to</c><00:19:09.400><c> think</c><00:19:09.760><c> about</c><00:19:10.000><c> where</c><00:19:10.200><c> he</c>

00:19:10.310 --> 00:19:10.320 align:start position:0%
table, wanting to think about where he
 

00:19:10.320 --> 00:19:12.790 align:start position:0%
table, wanting to think about where he
or<00:19:10.440><c> she</c><00:19:10.640><c> was</c><00:19:11.000><c> or</c><00:19:11.160><c> to</c><00:19:11.320><c> consult</c><00:19:11.760><c> records</c><00:19:12.400><c> like</c>

00:19:12.790 --> 00:19:12.800 align:start position:0%
or she was or to consult records like
 

00:19:12.800 --> 00:19:15.070 align:start position:0%
or she was or to consult records like
messages,<00:19:13.680><c> timestamps</c><00:19:14.280><c> on</c><00:19:14.400><c> your</c><00:19:14.520><c> phone</c><00:19:14.960><c> to</c>

00:19:15.070 --> 00:19:15.080 align:start position:0%
messages, timestamps on your phone to
 

00:19:15.080 --> 00:19:17.070 align:start position:0%
messages, timestamps on your phone to
see<00:19:15.360><c> where</c><00:19:15.640><c> exactly</c><00:19:16.120><c> you</c><00:19:16.280><c> were.</c><00:19:16.720><c> If</c><00:19:16.880><c> you</c><00:19:16.960><c> could</c>

00:19:17.070 --> 00:19:17.080 align:start position:0%
see where exactly you were. If you could
 

00:19:17.080 --> 00:19:18.950 align:start position:0%
see where exactly you were. If you could
remember<00:19:17.400><c> messages,</c><00:19:17.920><c> where</c><00:19:18.120><c> you</c><00:19:18.240><c> sent</c><00:19:18.480><c> them,</c>

00:19:18.950 --> 00:19:18.960 align:start position:0%
remember messages, where you sent them,
 

00:19:18.960 --> 00:19:20.950 align:start position:0%
remember messages, where you sent them,
when<00:19:19.200><c> you</c><00:19:19.320><c> sent</c><00:19:19.560><c> them.</c><00:19:20.040><c> The</c><00:19:20.120><c> prosecution</c><00:19:20.720><c> may</c>

00:19:20.950 --> 00:19:20.960 align:start position:0%
when you sent them. The prosecution may
 

00:19:20.960 --> 00:19:22.790 align:start position:0%
when you sent them. The prosecution may
argue<00:19:21.360><c> that</c><00:19:21.520><c> the</c><00:19:21.600><c> delay</c><00:19:22.120><c> is</c><00:19:22.280><c> a</c><00:19:22.360><c> sign</c><00:19:22.680><c> of</c>

00:19:22.790 --> 00:19:22.800 align:start position:0%
argue that the delay is a sign of
 

00:19:22.800 --> 00:19:25.230 align:start position:0%
argue that the delay is a sign of
deception,<00:19:24.000><c> not</c><00:19:24.480><c> an</c><00:19:24.600><c> attempt</c><00:19:25.000><c> to</c><00:19:25.080><c> be</c>

00:19:25.230 --> 00:19:25.240 align:start position:0%
deception, not an attempt to be
 

00:19:25.240 --> 00:19:27.270 align:start position:0%
deception, not an attempt to be
accurate.<00:19:26.280><c> Again,</c><00:19:26.600><c> police</c><00:19:26.880><c> are</c><00:19:26.960><c> not</c><00:19:27.080><c> paid</c><00:19:27.240><c> to</c>

00:19:27.270 --> 00:19:27.280 align:start position:0%
accurate. Again, police are not paid to
 

00:19:27.280 --> 00:19:28.790 align:start position:0%
accurate. Again, police are not paid to
prove<00:19:27.440><c> you</c><00:19:27.520><c> innocent.</c><00:19:27.960><c> Remember</c><00:19:28.240><c> that.</c><00:19:28.560><c> In</c>

00:19:28.790 --> 00:19:28.800 align:start position:0%
prove you innocent. Remember that. In
 

00:19:28.800 --> 00:19:30.470 align:start position:0%
prove you innocent. Remember that. In
Outing<00:19:29.080><c> versus</c><00:19:29.400><c> Commissioner,</c><00:19:29.880><c> for</c><00:19:30.040><c> example,</c>

00:19:30.470 --> 00:19:30.480 align:start position:0%
Outing versus Commissioner, for example,
 

00:19:30.480 --> 00:19:32.030 align:start position:0%
Outing versus Commissioner, for example,
the<00:19:30.560><c> defendant</c><00:19:30.840><c> was</c><00:19:30.960><c> arrested</c><00:19:31.320><c> four</c><00:19:31.600><c> days</c>

00:19:32.030 --> 00:19:32.040 align:start position:0%
the defendant was arrested four days
 

00:19:32.040 --> 00:19:33.950 align:start position:0%
the defendant was arrested four days
after<00:19:32.400><c> a</c><00:19:32.480><c> shooting.</c><00:19:33.080><c> Outing</c><00:19:33.400><c> told</c><00:19:33.600><c> police</c>

00:19:33.950 --> 00:19:33.960 align:start position:0%
after a shooting. Outing told police
 

00:19:33.960 --> 00:19:35.230 align:start position:0%
after a shooting. Outing told police
that<00:19:34.080><c> when</c><00:19:34.200><c> he</c><00:19:34.280><c> was</c><00:19:34.400><c> arrested,</c><00:19:34.840><c> he</c><00:19:34.960><c> did</c><00:19:35.080><c> not</c>

00:19:35.230 --> 00:19:35.240 align:start position:0%
that when he was arrested, he did not
 

00:19:35.240 --> 00:19:36.710 align:start position:0%
that when he was arrested, he did not
recall<00:19:35.560><c> where</c><00:19:35.680><c> he</c><00:19:35.840><c> was</c><00:19:36.080><c> at</c><00:19:36.160><c> the</c><00:19:36.240><c> time</c><00:19:36.520><c> of</c><00:19:36.640><c> the</c>

00:19:36.710 --> 00:19:36.720 align:start position:0%
recall where he was at the time of the
 

00:19:36.720 --> 00:19:38.630 align:start position:0%
recall where he was at the time of the
murder.<00:19:37.160><c> He</c><00:19:37.240><c> provided</c><00:19:37.560><c> police</c><00:19:38.000><c> with</c><00:19:38.160><c> a</c><00:19:38.240><c> list</c>

00:19:38.630 --> 00:19:38.640 align:start position:0%
murder. He provided police with a list
 

00:19:38.640 --> 00:19:41.190 align:start position:0%
murder. He provided police with a list
of<00:19:38.760><c> alibi</c><00:19:39.080><c> witnesses</c><00:19:39.520><c> the</c><00:19:39.640><c> next</c><00:19:40.280><c> morning.</c>

00:19:41.190 --> 00:19:41.200 align:start position:0%
of alibi witnesses the next morning.
 

00:19:41.200 --> 00:19:42.790 align:start position:0%
of alibi witnesses the next morning.
He<00:19:41.280><c> was</c><00:19:41.400><c> incarcerated</c><00:19:42.040><c> overnight.</c><00:19:42.560><c> There</c><00:19:42.680><c> was</c>

00:19:42.790 --> 00:19:42.800 align:start position:0%
He was incarcerated overnight. There was
 

00:19:42.800 --> 00:19:44.830 align:start position:0%
He was incarcerated overnight. There was
no<00:19:42.920><c> evidence</c><00:19:43.240><c> that</c><00:19:43.360><c> he</c><00:19:43.480><c> had</c><00:19:43.720><c> any</c><00:19:44.000><c> contact</c><00:19:44.560><c> with</c>

00:19:44.830 --> 00:19:44.840 align:start position:0%
no evidence that he had any contact with
 

00:19:44.840 --> 00:19:46.510 align:start position:0%
no evidence that he had any contact with
any<00:19:45.080><c> possible</c><00:19:45.600><c> alibi</c><00:19:45.920><c> witnesses</c><00:19:46.280><c> before</c>

00:19:46.510 --> 00:19:46.520 align:start position:0%
any possible alibi witnesses before
 

00:19:46.520 --> 00:19:48.470 align:start position:0%
any possible alibi witnesses before
providing<00:19:46.840><c> a</c><00:19:46.880><c> list</c><00:19:47.040><c> to</c><00:19:47.160><c> police,</c><00:19:47.520><c> mind</c><00:19:47.800><c> you.</c>

00:19:48.470 --> 00:19:48.480 align:start position:0%
providing a list to police, mind you.
 

00:19:48.480 --> 00:19:50.470 align:start position:0%
providing a list to police, mind you.
Trial<00:19:48.760><c> counsel,</c><00:19:49.280><c> however,</c><00:19:49.680><c> believed</c><00:19:50.120><c> that</c>

00:19:50.470 --> 00:19:50.480 align:start position:0%
Trial counsel, however, believed that
 

00:19:50.480 --> 00:19:53.030 align:start position:0%
Trial counsel, however, believed that
Outing's<00:19:51.000><c> inability</c><00:19:52.080><c> to</c><00:19:52.280><c> immediately</c>

00:19:53.030 --> 00:19:53.040 align:start position:0%
Outing's inability to immediately
 

00:19:53.040 --> 00:19:55.870 align:start position:0%
Outing's inability to immediately
provide<00:19:53.440><c> an</c><00:19:53.560><c> alibi</c><00:19:54.520><c> would</c><00:19:54.760><c> undercut</c><00:19:55.400><c> an</c><00:19:55.520><c> alibi</c>

00:19:55.870 --> 00:19:55.880 align:start position:0%
provide an alibi would undercut an alibi
 

00:19:55.880 --> 00:19:58.590 align:start position:0%
provide an alibi would undercut an alibi
defense.<00:19:57.040><c> Research</c><00:19:57.600><c> on</c><00:19:57.800><c> autobiographical</c>

00:19:58.590 --> 00:19:58.600 align:start position:0%
defense. Research on autobiographical
 

00:19:58.600 --> 00:20:00.430 align:start position:0%
defense. Research on autobiographical
memory<00:19:59.080><c> suggests</c><00:19:59.520><c> that</c><00:19:59.680><c> people</c><00:19:59.960><c> can</c><00:20:00.080><c> respond</c>

00:20:00.430 --> 00:20:00.440 align:start position:0%
memory suggests that people can respond
 

00:20:00.440 --> 00:20:02.030 align:start position:0%
memory suggests that people can respond
quickly<00:20:00.760><c> to</c><00:20:00.880><c> questions</c><00:20:01.320><c> about</c><00:20:01.560><c> their</c><00:20:01.720><c> past</c>

00:20:02.030 --> 00:20:02.040 align:start position:0%
quickly to questions about their past
 

00:20:02.040 --> 00:20:03.910 align:start position:0%
quickly to questions about their past
whereabouts<00:20:02.480><c> with</c><00:20:02.600><c> general</c><00:20:02.920><c> details,</c><00:20:03.800><c> but</c>

00:20:03.910 --> 00:20:03.920 align:start position:0%
whereabouts with general details, but
 

00:20:03.920 --> 00:20:05.750 align:start position:0%
whereabouts with general details, but
have<00:20:04.080><c> a</c><00:20:04.160><c> harder</c><00:20:04.520><c> time</c><00:20:04.800><c> recalling</c><00:20:05.240><c> specific</c>

00:20:05.750 --> 00:20:05.760 align:start position:0%
have a harder time recalling specific
 

00:20:05.760 --> 00:20:07.950 align:start position:0%
have a harder time recalling specific
ones.<00:20:06.560><c> Had</c><00:20:06.800><c> Outing's</c><00:20:07.080><c> attorney</c><00:20:07.520><c> been</c><00:20:07.760><c> more</c>

00:20:07.950 --> 00:20:07.960 align:start position:0%
ones. Had Outing's attorney been more
 

00:20:07.960 --> 00:20:09.710 align:start position:0%
ones. Had Outing's attorney been more
aware<00:20:08.280><c> of</c><00:20:08.400><c> the</c><00:20:08.480><c> limits</c><00:20:08.840><c> of</c><00:20:09.000><c> autobiographical</c>

00:20:09.710 --> 00:20:09.720 align:start position:0%
aware of the limits of autobiographical
 

00:20:09.720 --> 00:20:11.590 align:start position:0%
aware of the limits of autobiographical
memory,<00:20:10.240><c> she</c><00:20:10.440><c> may</c><00:20:10.600><c> have</c><00:20:10.720><c> been</c><00:20:10.880><c> able</c><00:20:11.080><c> to</c><00:20:11.160><c> defend</c>

00:20:11.590 --> 00:20:11.600 align:start position:0%
memory, she may have been able to defend
 

00:20:11.600 --> 00:20:13.230 align:start position:0%
memory, she may have been able to defend
Outing's<00:20:12.040><c> delay</c><00:20:12.480><c> in</c><00:20:12.600><c> naming</c><00:20:12.840><c> his</c><00:20:12.960><c> alibi</c>

00:20:13.230 --> 00:20:13.240 align:start position:0%
Outing's delay in naming his alibi
 

00:20:13.240 --> 00:20:14.830 align:start position:0%
Outing's delay in naming his alibi
witnesses,<00:20:13.800><c> possibly</c><00:20:14.320><c> with</c><00:20:14.440><c> the</c><00:20:14.560><c> aid</c><00:20:14.720><c> of</c>

00:20:14.830 --> 00:20:14.840 align:start position:0%
witnesses, possibly with the aid of
 

00:20:14.840 --> 00:20:16.990 align:start position:0%
witnesses, possibly with the aid of
expert<00:20:15.440><c> testimony.</c><00:20:16.160><c> Courts,</c><00:20:16.840><c> like</c>

00:20:16.990 --> 00:20:17.000 align:start position:0%
expert testimony. Courts, like
 

00:20:17.000 --> 00:20:18.710 align:start position:0%
expert testimony. Courts, like
investigators,<00:20:17.680><c> assume</c><00:20:18.240><c> that</c><00:20:18.400><c> innocent</c>

00:20:18.710 --> 00:20:18.720 align:start position:0%
investigators, assume that innocent
 

00:20:18.720 --> 00:20:20.470 align:start position:0%
investigators, assume that innocent
people<00:20:19.120><c> should</c><00:20:19.440><c> be</c><00:20:19.600><c> able</c><00:20:19.840><c> to</c><00:20:19.960><c> provide</c>

00:20:20.470 --> 00:20:20.480 align:start position:0%
people should be able to provide
 

00:20:20.480 --> 00:20:23.670 align:start position:0%
people should be able to provide
relatively<00:20:21.080><c> strong</c><00:20:22.040><c> and</c><00:20:22.360><c> accurate</c><00:20:22.800><c> alibis</c>

00:20:23.670 --> 00:20:23.680 align:start position:0%
relatively strong and accurate alibis
 

00:20:23.680 --> 00:20:25.830 align:start position:0%
relatively strong and accurate alibis
quickly,<00:20:24.760><c> which</c><00:20:25.000><c> is</c>

00:20:25.830 --> 00:20:25.840 align:start position:0%
quickly, which is
 

00:20:25.840 --> 00:20:29.590 align:start position:0%
quickly, which is
a<00:20:25.920><c> lot</c><00:20:26.240><c> to</c><00:20:26.400><c> ask</c><00:20:27.000><c> of</c><00:20:27.160><c> someone</c><00:20:27.880><c> who,</c><00:20:28.680><c> if</c><00:20:29.160><c> indeed</c>

00:20:29.590 --> 00:20:29.600 align:start position:0%
a lot to ask of someone who, if indeed
 

00:20:29.600 --> 00:20:32.430 align:start position:0%
a lot to ask of someone who, if indeed
innocent,<00:20:30.480><c> is</c><00:20:30.720><c> recounting</c><00:20:31.560><c> an</c><00:20:31.800><c> otherwise</c>

00:20:32.430 --> 00:20:32.440 align:start position:0%
innocent, is recounting an otherwise
 

00:20:32.440 --> 00:20:35.470 align:start position:0%
innocent, is recounting an otherwise
ordinary<00:20:33.200><c> or</c><00:20:33.640><c> uneventful</c><00:20:34.520><c> and</c><00:20:34.760><c> unmemorable</c>

00:20:35.470 --> 00:20:35.480 align:start position:0%
ordinary or uneventful and unmemorable
 

00:20:35.480 --> 00:20:38.510 align:start position:0%
ordinary or uneventful and unmemorable
day<00:20:36.080><c> or</c><00:20:36.560><c> moment</c><00:20:36.920><c> in</c><00:20:37.040><c> time.</c><00:20:37.680><c> This</c><00:20:37.880><c> turns</c><00:20:38.160><c> out</c><00:20:38.400><c> to</c>

00:20:38.510 --> 00:20:38.520 align:start position:0%
day or moment in time. This turns out to
 

00:20:38.520 --> 00:20:41.030 align:start position:0%
day or moment in time. This turns out to
be<00:20:38.640><c> untrue.</c><00:20:39.480><c> Duh.</c><00:20:40.040><c> Most</c><00:20:40.400><c> people</c><00:20:40.640><c> have</c><00:20:40.760><c> trouble</c>

00:20:41.030 --> 00:20:41.040 align:start position:0%
be untrue. Duh. Most people have trouble
 

00:20:41.040 --> 00:20:42.470 align:start position:0%
be untrue. Duh. Most people have trouble
accurately<00:20:41.480><c> recalling</c><00:20:41.960><c> where</c><00:20:42.120><c> they</c><00:20:42.280><c> were</c><00:20:42.400><c> in</c>

00:20:42.470 --> 00:20:42.480 align:start position:0%
accurately recalling where they were in
 

00:20:42.480 --> 00:20:44.070 align:start position:0%
accurately recalling where they were in
the<00:20:42.560><c> past.</c><00:20:43.080><c> The</c><00:20:43.160><c> majority</c><00:20:43.560><c> of</c><00:20:43.640><c> a</c><00:20:43.680><c> person's</c>

00:20:44.070 --> 00:20:44.080 align:start position:0%
the past. The majority of a person's
 

00:20:44.080 --> 00:20:46.270 align:start position:0%
the past. The majority of a person's
time,<00:20:44.600><c> especially</c><00:20:45.080><c> at</c><00:20:45.200><c> night,</c><00:20:45.640><c> on</c><00:20:45.800><c> weekends,</c>

00:20:46.270 --> 00:20:46.280 align:start position:0%
time, especially at night, on weekends,
 

00:20:46.280 --> 00:20:48.150 align:start position:0%
time, especially at night, on weekends,
and<00:20:46.400><c> during</c><00:20:46.600><c> the</c><00:20:46.680><c> holidays,</c><00:20:47.560><c> is</c><00:20:47.680><c> spent</c><00:20:48.000><c> with</c>

00:20:48.150 --> 00:20:48.160 align:start position:0%
and during the holidays, is spent with
 

00:20:48.160 --> 00:20:51.390 align:start position:0%
and during the holidays, is spent with
friends<00:20:48.480><c> and</c><00:20:48.640><c> family,</c><00:20:49.440><c> the</c><00:20:49.680><c> weakest</c><00:20:50.600><c> alibi</c>

00:20:51.390 --> 00:20:51.400 align:start position:0%
friends and family, the weakest alibi
 

00:20:51.400 --> 00:20:53.910 align:start position:0%
friends and family, the weakest alibi
witnesses.<00:20:52.280><c> In</c><00:20:52.520><c> State</c><00:20:52.960><c> versus</c><00:20:53.240><c> Dixon,</c><00:20:53.720><c> the</c>

00:20:53.910 --> 00:20:53.920 align:start position:0%
witnesses. In State versus Dixon, the
 

00:20:53.920 --> 00:20:55.710 align:start position:0%
witnesses. In State versus Dixon, the
defendant<00:20:54.280><c> first</c><00:20:54.480><c> learned</c><00:20:54.800><c> he</c><00:20:54.920><c> was</c><00:20:55.040><c> a</c><00:20:55.080><c> suspect</c>

00:20:55.710 --> 00:20:55.720 align:start position:0%
defendant first learned he was a suspect
 

00:20:55.720 --> 00:20:57.470 align:start position:0%
defendant first learned he was a suspect
in<00:20:55.840><c> a</c><00:20:55.920><c> murder</c><00:20:56.400><c> when</c><00:20:56.520><c> he</c><00:20:56.640><c> was</c><00:20:56.760><c> arrested</c><00:20:57.160><c> 18</c>

00:20:57.470 --> 00:20:57.480 align:start position:0%
in a murder when he was arrested 18
 

00:20:57.480 --> 00:20:59.590 align:start position:0%
in a murder when he was arrested 18
months<00:20:57.760><c> after</c><00:20:58.000><c> it</c><00:20:58.080><c> occurred.</c><00:20:58.840><c> His</c><00:20:59.000><c> mother</c><00:20:59.360><c> and</c>

00:20:59.590 --> 00:20:59.600 align:start position:0%
months after it occurred. His mother and
 

00:20:59.600 --> 00:21:01.190 align:start position:0%
months after it occurred. His mother and
aunt<00:20:59.960><c> repeatedly</c><00:21:00.440><c> told</c><00:21:00.600><c> police</c><00:21:00.880><c> that</c><00:21:00.960><c> he</c><00:21:01.080><c> was</c>

00:21:01.190 --> 00:21:01.200 align:start position:0%
aunt repeatedly told police that he was
 

00:21:01.200 --> 00:21:03.070 align:start position:0%
aunt repeatedly told police that he was
with<00:21:01.360><c> them</c><00:21:01.600><c> at</c><00:21:01.680><c> a</c><00:21:01.720><c> sports</c><00:21:02.080><c> bar</c><00:21:02.440><c> on</c><00:21:02.560><c> the</c><00:21:02.760><c> night</c>

00:21:03.070 --> 00:21:03.080 align:start position:0%
with them at a sports bar on the night
 

00:21:03.080 --> 00:21:04.990 align:start position:0%
with them at a sports bar on the night
of<00:21:03.160><c> the</c><00:21:03.280><c> murder</c><00:21:03.600><c> and</c><00:21:03.760><c> asked</c><00:21:04.160><c> them</c><00:21:04.400><c> to</c><00:21:04.560><c> contact</c>

00:21:04.990 --> 00:21:05.000 align:start position:0%
of the murder and asked them to contact
 

00:21:05.000 --> 00:21:06.710 align:start position:0%
of the murder and asked them to contact
the<00:21:05.080><c> bar</c><00:21:05.360><c> to</c><00:21:05.480><c> see</c><00:21:05.600><c> if</c><00:21:05.840><c> it</c><00:21:06.000><c> still</c><00:21:06.280><c> had</c><00:21:06.440><c> video</c>

00:21:06.710 --> 00:21:06.720 align:start position:0%
the bar to see if it still had video
 

00:21:06.720 --> 00:21:10.670 align:start position:0%
the bar to see if it still had video
recording<00:21:07.440><c> to</c><00:21:07.640><c> prove</c><00:21:08.200><c> Dixon's</c><00:21:08.880><c> alibi.</c><00:21:09.880><c> Police</c>

00:21:10.670 --> 00:21:10.680 align:start position:0%
recording to prove Dixon's alibi. Police
 

00:21:10.680 --> 00:21:12.590 align:start position:0%
recording to prove Dixon's alibi. Police
never<00:21:11.040><c> contacted</c><00:21:11.640><c> the</c><00:21:11.720><c> bar,</c><00:21:12.160><c> which</c><00:21:12.400><c> had</c><00:21:12.520><c> a</c>

00:21:12.590 --> 00:21:12.600 align:start position:0%
never contacted the bar, which had a
 

00:21:12.600 --> 00:21:15.310 align:start position:0%
never contacted the bar, which had a
fire<00:21:13.160><c> 6</c><00:21:13.480><c> months</c><00:21:13.960><c> after</c><00:21:14.200><c> Dixon's</c><00:21:14.600><c> arrest.</c><00:21:15.200><c> The</c>

00:21:15.310 --> 00:21:15.320 align:start position:0%
fire 6 months after Dixon's arrest. The
 

00:21:15.320 --> 00:21:16.630 align:start position:0%
fire 6 months after Dixon's arrest. The
Connecticut<00:21:15.720><c> Supreme</c><00:21:15.960><c> Court</c><00:21:16.200><c> noted</c><00:21:16.480><c> that,</c>

00:21:16.630 --> 00:21:16.640 align:start position:0%
Connecticut Supreme Court noted that,
 

00:21:16.640 --> 00:21:18.630 align:start position:0%
Connecticut Supreme Court noted that,
quote,<00:21:17.200><c> "Neither</c><00:21:17.680><c> of</c><00:21:17.800><c> the</c><00:21:17.920><c> alibi</c><00:21:18.200><c> witnesses</c>

00:21:18.630 --> 00:21:18.640 align:start position:0%
quote, "Neither of the alibi witnesses
 

00:21:18.640 --> 00:21:20.030 align:start position:0%
quote, "Neither of the alibi witnesses
testified<00:21:19.160><c> unequivocally</c><00:21:19.800><c> that</c><00:21:19.960><c> the</c>

00:21:20.030 --> 00:21:20.040 align:start position:0%
testified unequivocally that the
 

00:21:20.040 --> 00:21:21.310 align:start position:0%
testified unequivocally that the
defendant<00:21:20.400><c> had</c><00:21:20.520><c> been</c><00:21:20.680><c> in</c><00:21:20.760><c> the</c><00:21:20.800><c> sports</c><00:21:21.120><c> bar</c>

00:21:21.310 --> 00:21:21.320 align:start position:0%
defendant had been in the sports bar
 

00:21:21.320 --> 00:21:23.510 align:start position:0%
defendant had been in the sports bar
with<00:21:21.440><c> his</c><00:21:21.560><c> family</c><00:21:21.960><c> at</c><00:21:22.120><c> 9:30</c><00:21:22.520><c> p.m.</c><00:21:23.000><c> on</c><00:21:23.120><c> January</c>

00:21:23.510 --> 00:21:23.520 align:start position:0%
with his family at 9:30 p.m. on January
 

00:21:23.520 --> 00:21:26.070 align:start position:0%
with his family at 9:30 p.m. on January
9th,<00:21:23.920><c> 2010,</c><00:21:24.840><c> when</c><00:21:25.040><c> the</c><00:21:25.160><c> crime</c><00:21:25.480><c> occurred.</c>

00:21:26.070 --> 00:21:26.080 align:start position:0%
9th, 2010, when the crime occurred.
 

00:21:26.080 --> 00:21:27.350 align:start position:0%
9th, 2010, when the crime occurred.
Moreover,<00:21:26.600><c> to</c><00:21:26.720><c> the</c><00:21:26.840><c> extent</c><00:21:27.160><c> that</c><00:21:27.240><c> the</c>

00:21:27.350 --> 00:21:27.360 align:start position:0%
Moreover, to the extent that the
 

00:21:27.360 --> 00:21:28.750 align:start position:0%
Moreover, to the extent that the
testimony<00:21:27.800><c> of</c><00:21:27.840><c> the</c><00:21:27.920><c> defendant's</c><00:21:28.320><c> mother</c><00:21:28.600><c> and</c>

00:21:28.750 --> 00:21:28.760 align:start position:0%
testimony of the defendant's mother and
 

00:21:28.760 --> 00:21:30.510 align:start position:0%
testimony of the defendant's mother and
aunt<00:21:29.080><c> would</c><00:21:29.200><c> support</c><00:21:29.520><c> that</c><00:21:29.680><c> conclusion,</c><00:21:30.200><c> both</c>

00:21:30.510 --> 00:21:30.520 align:start position:0%
aunt would support that conclusion, both
 

00:21:30.520 --> 00:21:32.310 align:start position:0%
aunt would support that conclusion, both
witnesses<00:21:31.000><c> had</c><00:21:31.160><c> a</c><00:21:31.200><c> clear</c><00:21:31.480><c> motive</c><00:21:31.800><c> to</c><00:21:31.920><c> attempt</c>

00:21:32.310 --> 00:21:32.320 align:start position:0%
witnesses had a clear motive to attempt
 

00:21:32.320 --> 00:21:34.190 align:start position:0%
witnesses had a clear motive to attempt
to<00:21:32.440><c> convince</c><00:21:32.840><c> the</c><00:21:32.960><c> jury</c><00:21:33.360><c> that</c><00:21:33.560><c> defendant</c><00:21:34.040><c> was</c>

00:21:34.190 --> 00:21:34.200 align:start position:0%
to convince the jury that defendant was
 

00:21:34.200 --> 00:21:36.870 align:start position:0%
to convince the jury that defendant was
at<00:21:34.320><c> the</c><00:21:34.440><c> bar</c><00:21:35.000><c> at</c><00:21:35.240><c> that</c><00:21:35.480><c> time."</c><00:21:36.160><c> In</c><00:21:36.400><c> Dixon,</c><00:21:36.800><c> the</c>

00:21:36.870 --> 00:21:36.880 align:start position:0%
at the bar at that time." In Dixon, the
 

00:21:36.880 --> 00:21:38.070 align:start position:0%
at the bar at that time." In Dixon, the
defendant's<00:21:37.280><c> family</c><00:21:37.560><c> believed</c><00:21:37.880><c> that</c>

00:21:38.070 --> 00:21:38.080 align:start position:0%
defendant's family believed that
 

00:21:38.080 --> 00:21:40.030 align:start position:0%
defendant's family believed that
physical<00:21:38.480><c> alibi</c><00:21:38.800><c> evidence</c><00:21:39.120><c> existed,</c><00:21:39.880><c> but</c>

00:21:40.030 --> 00:21:40.040 align:start position:0%
physical alibi evidence existed, but
 

00:21:40.040 --> 00:21:41.830 align:start position:0%
physical alibi evidence existed, but
police<00:21:40.400><c> did</c><00:21:40.600><c> not</c><00:21:40.760><c> try</c><00:21:40.920><c> to</c><00:21:41.040><c> obtain</c><00:21:41.440><c> it</c><00:21:41.600><c> before</c>

00:21:41.830 --> 00:21:41.840 align:start position:0%
police did not try to obtain it before
 

00:21:41.840 --> 00:21:44.190 align:start position:0%
police did not try to obtain it before
it<00:21:41.960><c> was</c><00:21:42.120><c> lost</c><00:21:42.600><c> in</c><00:21:42.720><c> a</c><00:21:42.800><c> fire</c><00:21:43.240><c> at</c><00:21:43.360><c> the</c><00:21:43.480><c> bar.</c><00:21:43.960><c> Course</c>

00:21:44.190 --> 00:21:44.200 align:start position:0%
it was lost in a fire at the bar. Course
 

00:21:44.200 --> 00:21:46.230 align:start position:0%
it was lost in a fire at the bar. Course
they<00:21:44.280><c> didn't.</c><00:21:44.960><c> Don't</c><00:21:45.160><c> piss</c><00:21:45.280><c> me</c><00:21:45.440><c> off.</c><00:21:46.080><c> In</c><00:21:46.200><c> a</c>

00:21:46.230 --> 00:21:46.240 align:start position:0%
they didn't. Don't piss me off. In a
 

00:21:46.240 --> 00:21:48.310 align:start position:0%
they didn't. Don't piss me off. In a
survey<00:21:46.680><c> of</c><00:21:46.800><c> police</c><00:21:47.040><c> officers,</c>

00:21:48.310 --> 00:21:48.320 align:start position:0%
survey of police officers,
 

00:21:48.320 --> 00:21:49.310 align:start position:0%
survey of police officers,
so<00:21:48.440><c> of</c><00:21:48.480><c> course</c><00:21:48.640><c> we</c><00:21:48.720><c> have</c><00:21:48.800><c> to</c><00:21:48.880><c> ask</c><00:21:49.080><c> them</c><00:21:49.200><c> what</c>

00:21:49.310 --> 00:21:49.320 align:start position:0%
so of course we have to ask them what
 

00:21:49.320 --> 00:21:52.750 align:start position:0%
so of course we have to ask them what
they<00:21:49.480><c> think.</c><00:21:50.120><c> Less</c><00:21:50.400><c> than</c><00:21:50.560><c> half,</c><00:21:51.200><c> 49.2%,</c>

00:21:52.750 --> 00:21:52.760 align:start position:0%
they think. Less than half, 49.2%,
 

00:21:52.760 --> 00:21:54.270 align:start position:0%
they think. Less than half, 49.2%,
said<00:21:52.960><c> that</c><00:21:53.080><c> a</c><00:21:53.200><c> thorough</c><00:21:53.480><c> investigation</c><00:21:54.080><c> of</c><00:21:54.160><c> an</c>

00:21:54.270 --> 00:21:54.280 align:start position:0%
said that a thorough investigation of an
 

00:21:54.280 --> 00:21:57.270 align:start position:0%
said that a thorough investigation of an
alibi<00:21:54.760><c> is</c><00:21:55.080><c> always</c><00:21:55.600><c> conducted</c><00:21:56.840><c> before</c><00:21:57.200><c> an</c>

00:21:57.270 --> 00:21:57.280 align:start position:0%
alibi is always conducted before an
 

00:21:57.280 --> 00:21:58.950 align:start position:0%
alibi is always conducted before an
arrest<00:21:57.760><c> warrant</c><00:21:58.040><c> is</c><00:21:58.160><c> prepared</c><00:21:58.760><c> or</c><00:21:58.880><c> the</c>

00:21:58.950 --> 00:21:58.960 align:start position:0%
arrest warrant is prepared or the
 

00:21:58.960 --> 00:22:01.990 align:start position:0%
arrest warrant is prepared or the
defendant<00:21:59.360><c> arrested.</c><00:22:00.200><c> 38.1%</c><00:22:01.360><c> said</c><00:22:01.480><c> it</c><00:22:01.640><c> is,</c>

00:22:01.990 --> 00:22:02.000 align:start position:0%
defendant arrested. 38.1% said it is,
 

00:22:02.000 --> 00:22:04.950 align:start position:0%
defendant arrested. 38.1% said it is,
quote,<00:22:02.440><c> "often</c><00:22:02.920><c> investigated."</c><00:22:03.800><c> 7.9%</c><00:22:04.760><c> said</c>

00:22:04.950 --> 00:22:04.960 align:start position:0%
quote, "often investigated." 7.9% said
 

00:22:04.960 --> 00:22:06.830 align:start position:0%
quote, "often investigated." 7.9% said
it<00:22:05.080><c> is,</c><00:22:05.240><c> "sometimes</c><00:22:05.840><c> investigated."</c><00:22:06.520><c> And</c>

00:22:06.830 --> 00:22:06.840 align:start position:0%
it is, "sometimes investigated." And
 

00:22:06.840 --> 00:22:09.270 align:start position:0%
it is, "sometimes investigated." And
only<00:22:07.160><c> 4.8%</c><00:22:08.080><c> said</c><00:22:08.240><c> it</c><00:22:08.360><c> is,</c><00:22:08.520><c> "rarely</c><00:22:08.920><c> or</c><00:22:09.080><c> never</c>

00:22:09.270 --> 00:22:09.280 align:start position:0%
only 4.8% said it is, "rarely or never
 

00:22:09.280 --> 00:22:10.270 align:start position:0%
only 4.8% said it is, "rarely or never
investigated<00:22:09.760><c> before</c><00:22:09.920><c> the</c><00:22:10.000><c> warrant</c><00:22:10.200><c> is</c>

00:22:10.270 --> 00:22:10.280 align:start position:0%
investigated before the warrant is
 

00:22:10.280 --> 00:22:11.470 align:start position:0%
investigated before the warrant is
prepared<00:22:10.600><c> or</c><00:22:10.680><c> the</c><00:22:10.760><c> defendant</c><00:22:11.000><c> is</c><00:22:11.080><c> arrested."</c>

00:22:11.470 --> 00:22:11.480 align:start position:0%
prepared or the defendant is arrested."
 

00:22:11.480 --> 00:22:12.830 align:start position:0%
prepared or the defendant is arrested."
Telling<00:22:11.760><c> the</c><00:22:11.840><c> police</c><00:22:12.040><c> about</c><00:22:12.240><c> physical</c><00:22:12.560><c> alibi</c>

00:22:12.830 --> 00:22:12.840 align:start position:0%
Telling the police about physical alibi
 

00:22:12.840 --> 00:22:14.390 align:start position:0%
Telling the police about physical alibi
evidence<00:22:13.160><c> does</c><00:22:13.360><c> not</c><00:22:13.560><c> mean</c><00:22:13.920><c> that</c><00:22:14.080><c> it</c><00:22:14.200><c> will</c><00:22:14.280><c> be</c>

00:22:14.390 --> 00:22:14.400 align:start position:0%
evidence does not mean that it will be
 

00:22:14.400 --> 00:22:16.590 align:start position:0%
evidence does not mean that it will be
pursued.<00:22:15.200><c> Clearly.</c>

00:22:16.590 --> 00:22:16.600 align:start position:0%
pursued. Clearly.
 

00:22:16.600 --> 00:22:18.870 align:start position:0%
pursued. Clearly.
Ugh.<00:22:17.480><c> In</c><00:22:17.640><c> Dixon's</c><00:22:18.000><c> case,</c><00:22:18.240><c> that's</c><00:22:18.480><c> horrible.</c>

00:22:18.870 --> 00:22:18.880 align:start position:0%
Ugh. In Dixon's case, that's horrible.
 

00:22:18.880 --> 00:22:21.110 align:start position:0%
Ugh. In Dixon's case, that's horrible.
That's<00:22:19.080><c> heartbreaking.</c><00:22:20.280><c> To</c><00:22:20.440><c> assume</c><00:22:20.840><c> that's</c>

00:22:21.110 --> 00:22:21.120 align:start position:0%
That's heartbreaking. To assume that's
 

00:22:21.120 --> 00:22:22.910 align:start position:0%
That's heartbreaking. To assume that's
that's<00:22:21.440><c> also</c><00:22:21.720><c> a</c><00:22:21.800><c> problem,</c><00:22:22.160><c> right?</c><00:22:22.440><c> Innocent</c>

00:22:22.910 --> 00:22:22.920 align:start position:0%
that's also a problem, right? Innocent
 

00:22:22.920 --> 00:22:24.390 align:start position:0%
that's also a problem, right? Innocent
people,<00:22:23.320><c> people</c><00:22:23.560><c> who</c><00:22:23.640><c> are</c><00:22:23.760><c> actually</c><00:22:24.120><c> innocent</c>

00:22:24.390 --> 00:22:24.400 align:start position:0%
people, people who are actually innocent
 

00:22:24.400 --> 00:22:26.710 align:start position:0%
people, people who are actually innocent
innocent<00:22:24.720><c> of</c><00:22:24.760><c> events,</c><00:22:25.400><c> will</c><00:22:25.640><c> assume</c><00:22:26.480><c> that</c>

00:22:26.710 --> 00:22:26.720 align:start position:0%
innocent of events, will assume that
 

00:22:26.720 --> 00:22:28.590 align:start position:0%
innocent of events, will assume that
police<00:22:27.000><c> will</c><00:22:27.080><c> do</c><00:22:27.200><c> their</c><00:22:27.280><c> jobs.</c><00:22:28.240><c> They</c><00:22:28.440><c> will</c>

00:22:28.590 --> 00:22:28.600 align:start position:0%
police will do their jobs. They will
 

00:22:28.600 --> 00:22:29.670 align:start position:0%
police will do their jobs. They will
assume,<00:22:28.960><c> "Well,</c><00:22:29.200><c> I</c><00:22:29.280><c> don't</c><00:22:29.400><c> have</c><00:22:29.480><c> to</c><00:22:29.560><c> get</c><00:22:29.640><c> a</c>

00:22:29.670 --> 00:22:29.680 align:start position:0%
assume, "Well, I don't have to get a
 

00:22:29.680 --> 00:22:32.190 align:start position:0%
assume, "Well, I don't have to get a
lawyer,<00:22:30.080><c> right?</c><00:22:30.520><c> I</c><00:22:30.560><c> I</c><00:22:30.840><c> like</c><00:22:31.160><c> they</c><00:22:31.520><c> I</c><00:22:31.640><c> told</c><00:22:31.920><c> them</c>

00:22:32.190 --> 00:22:32.200 align:start position:0%
lawyer, right? I I like they I told them
 

00:22:32.200 --> 00:22:33.990 align:start position:0%
lawyer, right? I I like they I told them
to<00:22:32.360><c> look</c><00:22:32.520><c> at</c><00:22:32.600><c> the</c><00:22:33.160><c> videotape</c><00:22:33.560><c> from</c><00:22:33.680><c> the</c><00:22:33.760><c> sports</c>

00:22:33.990 --> 00:22:34.000 align:start position:0%
to look at the videotape from the sports
 

00:22:34.000 --> 00:22:35.430 align:start position:0%
to look at the videotape from the sports
bar.<00:22:34.120><c> They're</c><00:22:34.240><c> going</c><00:22:34.360><c> to</c><00:22:34.440><c> look."</c><00:22:34.840><c> Maybe</c>

00:22:35.430 --> 00:22:35.440 align:start position:0%
bar. They're going to look." Maybe
 

00:22:35.440 --> 00:22:36.710 align:start position:0%
bar. They're going to look." Maybe
again,<00:22:35.760><c> their</c><00:22:35.960><c> their</c><00:22:36.120><c> job</c><00:22:36.280><c> is</c><00:22:36.360><c> not</c><00:22:36.480><c> to</c><00:22:36.560><c> prove</c>

00:22:36.710 --> 00:22:36.720 align:start position:0%
again, their their job is not to prove
 

00:22:36.720 --> 00:22:39.190 align:start position:0%
again, their their job is not to prove
you<00:22:36.800><c> innocent.</c><00:22:37.200><c> Hello.</c>

00:22:39.190 --> 00:22:39.200 align:start position:0%
you innocent. Hello.
 

00:22:39.200 --> 00:22:40.510 align:start position:0%
you innocent. Hello.
You<00:22:39.360><c> need</c><00:22:39.480><c> to</c><00:22:39.560><c> retain</c><00:22:39.880><c> someone</c><00:22:40.120><c> whose</c><00:22:40.240><c> job</c><00:22:40.440><c> it</c>

00:22:40.510 --> 00:22:40.520 align:start position:0%
You need to retain someone whose job it
 

00:22:40.520 --> 00:22:42.390 align:start position:0%
You need to retain someone whose job it
actually<00:22:40.800><c> is</c><00:22:40.880><c> to</c><00:22:40.960><c> do</c><00:22:41.080><c> that.</c><00:22:41.680><c> And</c><00:22:41.880><c> get</c><00:22:42.040><c> a</c><00:22:42.080><c> copy</c>

00:22:42.390 --> 00:22:42.400 align:start position:0%
actually is to do that. And get a copy
 

00:22:42.400 --> 00:22:44.710 align:start position:0%
actually is to do that. And get a copy
of<00:22:42.440><c> that</c><00:22:42.600><c> stuff</c><00:22:42.880><c> just</c><00:22:43.120><c> in</c><00:22:43.240><c> case,</c><00:22:43.640><c> right?</c><00:22:44.400><c> You</c>

00:22:44.710 --> 00:22:44.720 align:start position:0%
of that stuff just in case, right? You
 

00:22:44.720 --> 00:22:46.990 align:start position:0%
of that stuff just in case, right? You
never<00:22:45.000><c> want</c><00:22:45.200><c> to</c><00:22:45.280><c> assume</c><00:22:46.120><c> everyone's</c><00:22:46.880><c> ill</c>

00:22:46.990 --> 00:22:47.000 align:start position:0%
never want to assume everyone's ill
 

00:22:47.000 --> 00:22:48.550 align:start position:0%
never want to assume everyone's ill
intentions<00:22:47.360><c> and</c><00:22:47.440><c> bad</c><00:22:47.600><c> will,</c><00:22:47.800><c> but</c><00:22:48.040><c> absolutely</c>

00:22:48.550 --> 00:22:48.560 align:start position:0%
intentions and bad will, but absolutely
 

00:22:48.560 --> 00:22:49.830 align:start position:0%
intentions and bad will, but absolutely
you<00:22:48.720><c> always</c><00:22:49.040><c> want</c><00:22:49.200><c> to</c><00:22:49.280><c> prepare</c><00:22:49.520><c> for</c><00:22:49.600><c> the</c><00:22:49.680><c> worst</c>

00:22:49.830 --> 00:22:49.840 align:start position:0%
you always want to prepare for the worst
 

00:22:49.840 --> 00:22:51.110 align:start position:0%
you always want to prepare for the worst
case<00:22:49.960><c> scenario.</c>

00:22:51.110 --> 00:22:51.120 align:start position:0%
case scenario.
 

00:22:51.120 --> 00:22:52.990 align:start position:0%
case scenario.
Which<00:22:51.360><c> inherently</c><00:22:51.880><c> does</c><00:22:52.560><c> force</c><00:22:52.840><c> you</c><00:22:52.920><c> to</c>

00:22:52.990 --> 00:22:53.000 align:start position:0%
Which inherently does force you to
 

00:22:53.000 --> 00:22:55.830 align:start position:0%
Which inherently does force you to
assume<00:22:54.000><c> the</c><00:22:54.120><c> worst</c><00:22:54.400><c> in</c><00:22:54.520><c> people</c><00:22:55.040><c> and</c><00:22:55.200><c> police.</c>

00:22:55.830 --> 00:22:55.840 align:start position:0%
assume the worst in people and police.
 

00:22:55.840 --> 00:22:57.870 align:start position:0%
assume the worst in people and police.
Very<00:22:56.120><c> often</c><00:22:56.520><c> turns</c><00:22:56.760><c> out</c><00:22:56.880><c> to</c><00:22:56.960><c> be</c><00:22:57.040><c> true.</c><00:22:57.560><c> Note</c>

00:22:57.870 --> 00:22:57.880 align:start position:0%
Very often turns out to be true. Note
 

00:22:57.880 --> 00:22:59.910 align:start position:0%
Very often turns out to be true. Note
that<00:22:58.000><c> if</c><00:22:58.080><c> the</c><00:22:58.200><c> police</c><00:22:58.560><c> fail</c><00:22:59.000><c> to</c><00:22:59.120><c> follow</c><00:22:59.440><c> up</c><00:22:59.720><c> on</c>

00:22:59.910 --> 00:22:59.920 align:start position:0%
that if the police fail to follow up on
 

00:22:59.920 --> 00:23:02.150 align:start position:0%
that if the police fail to follow up on
alibi<00:23:00.280><c> information,</c><00:23:01.120><c> the</c><00:23:01.200><c> defendant</c><00:23:01.680><c> could</c>

00:23:02.150 --> 00:23:02.160 align:start position:0%
alibi information, the defendant could
 

00:23:02.160 --> 00:23:04.510 align:start position:0%
alibi information, the defendant could
combine<00:23:02.640><c> an</c><00:23:02.800><c> alibi</c><00:23:03.120><c> defense</c><00:23:03.640><c> with</c><00:23:03.800><c> a</c><00:23:03.840><c> claim</c><00:23:04.400><c> of</c>

00:23:04.510 --> 00:23:04.520 align:start position:0%
combine an alibi defense with a claim of
 

00:23:04.520 --> 00:23:06.790 align:start position:0%
combine an alibi defense with a claim of
an<00:23:04.640><c> investigative</c><00:23:05.360><c> failure</c><00:23:05.840><c> or</c><00:23:06.120><c> omission,</c>

00:23:06.790 --> 00:23:06.800 align:start position:0%
an investigative failure or omission,
 

00:23:06.800 --> 00:23:08.870 align:start position:0%
an investigative failure or omission,
arguing<00:23:07.360><c> that</c><00:23:07.520><c> a</c><00:23:07.600><c> jury</c><00:23:08.000><c> could</c><00:23:08.400><c> find</c>

00:23:08.870 --> 00:23:08.880 align:start position:0%
arguing that a jury could find
 

00:23:08.880 --> 00:23:10.950 align:start position:0%
arguing that a jury could find
reasonable<00:23:09.320><c> doubt</c><00:23:09.680><c> if</c><00:23:09.880><c> jurors</c><00:23:10.240><c> conclude</c><00:23:10.760><c> that</c>

00:23:10.950 --> 00:23:10.960 align:start position:0%
reasonable doubt if jurors conclude that
 

00:23:10.960 --> 00:23:12.990 align:start position:0%
reasonable doubt if jurors conclude that
{quote}<00:23:11.400><c> the</c><00:23:11.480><c> investigation</c><00:23:12.160><c> was</c><00:23:12.400><c> careless,</c>

00:23:12.990 --> 00:23:13.000 align:start position:0%
{quote} the investigation was careless,
 

00:23:13.000 --> 00:23:15.150 align:start position:0%
{quote} the investigation was careless,
incomplete,<00:23:13.760><c> or</c><00:23:14.120><c> so</c><00:23:14.400><c> focused</c><00:23:14.920><c> on</c><00:23:15.040><c> the</c>

00:23:15.150 --> 00:23:15.160 align:start position:0%
incomplete, or so focused on the
 

00:23:15.160 --> 00:23:17.110 align:start position:0%
incomplete, or so focused on the
defendant<00:23:15.800><c> that</c><00:23:15.960><c> it</c><00:23:16.080><c> ignored</c><00:23:16.480><c> leads</c><00:23:16.840><c> that</c><00:23:17.000><c> may</c>

00:23:17.110 --> 00:23:17.120 align:start position:0%
defendant that it ignored leads that may
 

00:23:17.120 --> 00:23:19.470 align:start position:0%
defendant that it ignored leads that may
have<00:23:17.240><c> suggested</c><00:23:18.040><c> other</c><00:23:18.240><c> culprits.</c><00:23:19.120><c> This</c><00:23:19.320><c> may</c>

00:23:19.470 --> 00:23:19.480 align:start position:0%
have suggested other culprits. This may
 

00:23:19.480 --> 00:23:21.310 align:start position:0%
have suggested other culprits. This may
be<00:23:19.600><c> especially</c><00:23:20.000><c> important</c><00:23:20.480><c> to</c><00:23:20.600><c> counter</c><00:23:21.120><c> one</c>

00:23:21.310 --> 00:23:21.320 align:start position:0%
be especially important to counter one
 

00:23:21.320 --> 00:23:23.550 align:start position:0%
be especially important to counter one
of<00:23:21.480><c> my</c><00:23:21.960><c> biggest</c>

00:23:23.550 --> 00:23:23.560 align:start position:0%
of my biggest
 

00:23:23.560 --> 00:23:25.670 align:start position:0%
of my biggest
gripes,<00:23:24.200><c> to</c><00:23:24.360><c> counter</c><00:23:24.800><c> jurors'</c><00:23:25.200><c> inherent</c>

00:23:25.670 --> 00:23:25.680 align:start position:0%
gripes, to counter jurors' inherent
 

00:23:25.680 --> 00:23:28.510 align:start position:0%
gripes, to counter jurors' inherent
belief<00:23:26.600><c> that</c><00:23:26.720><c> if</c><00:23:26.840><c> a</c><00:23:26.920><c> case</c><00:23:27.240><c> goes</c><00:23:27.480><c> to</c><00:23:27.560><c> trial,</c>

00:23:28.510 --> 00:23:28.520 align:start position:0%
belief that if a case goes to trial,
 

00:23:28.520 --> 00:23:30.030 align:start position:0%
belief that if a case goes to trial,
there<00:23:28.680><c> is</c><00:23:28.800><c> a</c><00:23:28.880><c> reason</c><00:23:29.160><c> not</c><00:23:29.320><c> to</c><00:23:29.400><c> trust</c><00:23:29.640><c> an</c><00:23:29.760><c> alibi</c>

00:23:30.030 --> 00:23:30.040 align:start position:0%
there is a reason not to trust an alibi
 

00:23:30.040 --> 00:23:32.470 align:start position:0%
there is a reason not to trust an alibi
witness.<00:23:30.800><c> If</c><00:23:30.920><c> police</c><00:23:31.640><c> the</c><00:23:31.760><c> alibi,</c><00:23:32.120><c> the</c><00:23:32.240><c> case</c>

00:23:32.470 --> 00:23:32.480 align:start position:0%
witness. If police the alibi, the case
 

00:23:32.480 --> 00:23:34.270 align:start position:0%
witness. If police the alibi, the case
would<00:23:32.600><c> not</c><00:23:32.720><c> have</c><00:23:32.840><c> progressed</c><00:23:33.160><c> to</c><00:23:33.240><c> trial.</c><00:23:34.000><c> That</c>

00:23:34.270 --> 00:23:34.280 align:start position:0%
would not have progressed to trial. That
 

00:23:34.280 --> 00:23:35.950 align:start position:0%
would not have progressed to trial. That
is<00:23:34.680><c> unfortunately</c><00:23:35.240><c> the</c><00:23:35.320><c> default</c><00:23:35.640><c> assumption</c>

00:23:35.950 --> 00:23:35.960 align:start position:0%
is unfortunately the default assumption
 

00:23:35.960 --> 00:23:37.430 align:start position:0%
is unfortunately the default assumption
of<00:23:36.040><c> so</c><00:23:36.160><c> many</c><00:23:36.320><c> people,</c><00:23:36.600><c> and</c><00:23:36.720><c> it</c><00:23:36.840><c> is</c><00:23:36.960><c> my</c><00:23:37.080><c> biggest</c>

00:23:37.430 --> 00:23:37.440 align:start position:0%
of so many people, and it is my biggest
 

00:23:37.440 --> 00:23:38.790 align:start position:0%
of so many people, and it is my biggest
pet<00:23:37.640><c> peeve.</c><00:23:37.960><c> Oh</c><00:23:38.040><c> my</c><00:23:38.160><c> goodness</c><00:23:38.400><c> gracious,</c>

00:23:38.790 --> 00:23:38.800 align:start position:0%
pet peeve. Oh my goodness gracious,
 

00:23:38.800 --> 00:23:41.070 align:start position:0%
pet peeve. Oh my goodness gracious,
enough<00:23:39.080><c> enough</c><00:23:39.320><c> enough.</c><00:23:39.600><c> And</c><00:23:39.720><c> we</c><00:23:39.840><c> should</c><00:23:40.080><c> just</c>

00:23:41.070 --> 00:23:41.080 align:start position:0%
enough enough enough. And we should just
 

00:23:41.080 --> 00:23:43.070 align:start position:0%
enough enough enough. And we should just
believe<00:23:41.400><c> everything</c><00:23:41.880><c> the</c><00:23:42.000><c> police</c><00:23:42.400><c> believe.</c><00:23:43.040><c> I</c>

00:23:43.070 --> 00:23:43.080 align:start position:0%
believe everything the police believe. I
 

00:23:43.080 --> 00:23:45.110 align:start position:0%
believe everything the police believe. I
have<00:23:43.160><c> a</c><00:23:43.200><c> new</c><00:23:43.400><c> cat</c><00:23:43.720><c> in</c><00:23:43.800><c> the</c><00:23:43.920><c> room,</c><00:23:44.400><c> if</c><00:23:44.560><c> anyone</c>

00:23:45.110 --> 00:23:45.120 align:start position:0%
have a new cat in the room, if anyone
 

00:23:45.120 --> 00:23:46.790 align:start position:0%
have a new cat in the room, if anyone
watching<00:23:45.400><c> on</c><00:23:45.480><c> YouTube</c><00:23:45.720><c> can</c><00:23:45.880><c> see.</c><00:23:46.720><c> We</c>

00:23:46.790 --> 00:23:46.800 align:start position:0%
watching on YouTube can see. We
 

00:23:46.800 --> 00:23:48.950 align:start position:0%
watching on YouTube can see. We
previously<00:23:47.320><c> just</c><00:23:47.600><c> had</c><00:23:47.840><c> my</c><00:23:48.040><c> co-counsel</c><00:23:48.560><c> Dewey</c>

00:23:48.950 --> 00:23:48.960 align:start position:0%
previously just had my co-counsel Dewey
 

00:23:48.960 --> 00:23:51.470 align:start position:0%
previously just had my co-counsel Dewey
here<00:23:49.200><c> next</c><00:23:49.480><c> to</c><00:23:49.560><c> me,</c><00:23:49.880><c> PTFO,</c><00:23:50.480><c> passed</c><00:23:50.840><c> out,</c>

00:23:51.470 --> 00:23:51.480 align:start position:0%
here next to me, PTFO, passed out,
 

00:23:51.480 --> 00:23:53.310 align:start position:0%
here next to me, PTFO, passed out,
shifting<00:23:51.840><c> around</c><00:23:52.240><c> from</c><00:23:52.400><c> time</c><00:23:52.600><c> to</c><00:23:52.720><c> time</c><00:23:53.000><c> in</c><00:23:53.080><c> his</c>

00:23:53.310 --> 00:23:53.320 align:start position:0%
shifting around from time to time in his
 

00:23:53.320 --> 00:23:55.670 align:start position:0%
shifting around from time to time in his
beautiful<00:23:53.680><c> little</c><00:23:53.920><c> contraption</c><00:23:54.560><c> that</c><00:23:54.760><c> moves.</c>

00:23:55.670 --> 00:23:55.680 align:start position:0%
beautiful little contraption that moves.
 

00:23:55.680 --> 00:23:58.190 align:start position:0%
beautiful little contraption that moves.
And<00:23:56.000><c> Simba</c><00:23:56.800><c> uh</c><00:23:56.920><c> waltzed</c><00:23:57.400><c> in</c><00:23:57.640><c> back</c><00:23:57.920><c> there</c>

00:23:58.190 --> 00:23:58.200 align:start position:0%
And Simba uh waltzed in back there
 

00:23:58.200 --> 00:24:00.470 align:start position:0%
And Simba uh waltzed in back there
because<00:23:58.480><c> he</c><00:23:58.680><c> felt</c><00:23:58.920><c> left</c><00:23:59.200><c> out.</c><00:23:59.720><c> He</c><00:24:00.000><c> is</c><00:24:00.320><c> the</c>

00:24:00.470 --> 00:24:00.480 align:start position:0%
because he felt left out. He is the
 

00:24:00.480 --> 00:24:03.310 align:start position:0%
because he felt left out. He is the
older<00:24:00.720><c> one,</c><00:24:01.520><c> Dewey</c><00:24:02.000><c> is</c><00:24:02.480><c> only</c><00:24:02.760><c> just</c><00:24:03.040><c> about</c><00:24:03.280><c> a</c>

00:24:03.310 --> 00:24:03.320 align:start position:0%
older one, Dewey is only just about a
 

00:24:03.320 --> 00:24:05.270 align:start position:0%
older one, Dewey is only just about a
year<00:24:03.560><c> old,</c><00:24:03.920><c> Simba</c><00:24:04.200><c> is</c><00:24:04.360><c> almost</c><00:24:04.760><c> eight,</c><00:24:05.080><c> and</c>

00:24:05.270 --> 00:24:05.280 align:start position:0%
year old, Simba is almost eight, and
 

00:24:05.280 --> 00:24:07.350 align:start position:0%
year old, Simba is almost eight, and
Simba<00:24:05.600><c> is</c><00:24:06.080><c> has</c><00:24:06.240><c> all</c><00:24:06.360><c> the</c><00:24:06.480><c> attitude</c><00:24:07.160><c> of</c><00:24:07.280><c> the</c>

00:24:07.350 --> 00:24:07.360 align:start position:0%
Simba is has all the attitude of the
 

00:24:07.360 --> 00:24:10.190 align:start position:0%
Simba is has all the attitude of the
world.<00:24:07.640><c> He</c><00:24:07.880><c> He</c><00:24:08.120><c> is</c><00:24:08.720><c> His</c><00:24:08.920><c> attitude</c><00:24:09.520><c> is</c><00:24:09.880><c> coming</c>

00:24:10.190 --> 00:24:10.200 align:start position:0%
world. He He is His attitude is coming
 

00:24:10.200 --> 00:24:11.670 align:start position:0%
world. He He is His attitude is coming
from<00:24:10.360><c> all</c><00:24:10.480><c> the</c><00:24:10.640><c> orange</c><00:24:10.960><c> on</c><00:24:11.120><c> him,</c><00:24:11.360><c> which</c><00:24:11.520><c> isn't</c>

00:24:11.670 --> 00:24:11.680 align:start position:0%
from all the orange on him, which isn't
 

00:24:11.680 --> 00:24:13.230 align:start position:0%
from all the orange on him, which isn't
a<00:24:11.720><c> lot</c><00:24:11.920><c> of</c><00:24:12.000><c> orange.</c>

00:24:13.230 --> 00:24:13.240 align:start position:0%
a lot of orange.
 

00:24:13.240 --> 00:24:16.030 align:start position:0%
a lot of orange.
But<00:24:13.760><c> it</c><00:24:14.400><c> it</c><00:24:14.880><c> it's</c><00:24:15.080><c> because</c><00:24:15.360><c> it</c><00:24:15.520><c> mostly</c><00:24:15.880><c> went</c>

00:24:16.030 --> 00:24:16.040 align:start position:0%
But it it it's because it mostly went
 

00:24:16.040 --> 00:24:17.790 align:start position:0%
But it it it's because it mostly went
into<00:24:16.440><c> his</c>

00:24:17.790 --> 00:24:17.800 align:start position:0%
into his
 

00:24:17.800 --> 00:24:20.070 align:start position:0%
into his
state<00:24:18.080><c> of</c><00:24:18.240><c> mind,</c><00:24:19.040><c> his</c><00:24:19.240><c> sassiness,</c><00:24:19.840><c> if</c><00:24:20.000><c> you</c>

00:24:20.070 --> 00:24:20.080 align:start position:0%
state of mind, his sassiness, if you
 

00:24:20.080 --> 00:24:23.390 align:start position:0%
state of mind, his sassiness, if you
will.<00:24:20.360><c> But</c><00:24:20.480><c> he</c><00:24:20.560><c> was</c><00:24:20.680><c> also</c><00:24:20.880><c> raised</c><00:24:21.120><c> by</c><00:24:21.240><c> me.</c><00:24:22.040><c> So.</c>

00:24:23.390 --> 00:24:23.400 align:start position:0%
will. But he was also raised by me. So.
 

00:24:23.400 --> 00:24:26.551 align:start position:0%
will. But he was also raised by me. So.
Really,<00:24:23.680><c> who</c><00:24:23.800><c> can</c><00:24:23.960><c> we</c><00:24:24.040><c> blame?</c><00:24:24.720><c> Probably</c><00:24:25.080><c> me.</c>

00:24:26.551 --> 00:24:26.561 align:start position:0%
Really, who can we blame? Probably me.
 

00:24:26.561 --> 00:24:26.870 align:start position:0%
Really, who can we blame? Probably me.
&gt;&gt; [snorts]

00:24:26.870 --> 00:24:26.880 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; [snorts]
 

00:24:26.880 --> 00:24:28.590 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; [snorts]
&gt;&gt; Right.<00:24:27.400><c> Well,</c><00:24:27.560><c> the</c><00:24:27.680><c> fact</c><00:24:27.920><c> that</c><00:24:28.040><c> comparatively</c>

00:24:28.590 --> 00:24:28.600 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; Right. Well, the fact that comparatively
 

00:24:28.600 --> 00:24:30.230 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; Right. Well, the fact that comparatively
few<00:24:28.800><c> cases</c><00:24:29.160><c> are</c><00:24:29.240><c> dismissed</c><00:24:29.640><c> as</c><00:24:29.760><c> a</c><00:24:29.800><c> result</c><00:24:30.120><c> of</c>

00:24:30.230 --> 00:24:30.240 align:start position:0%
few cases are dismissed as a result of
 

00:24:30.240 --> 00:24:31.830 align:start position:0%
few cases are dismissed as a result of
pre-trial<00:24:30.680><c> investigation</c><00:24:31.280><c> is</c><00:24:31.400><c> entirely</c>

00:24:31.830 --> 00:24:31.840 align:start position:0%
pre-trial investigation is entirely
 

00:24:31.840 --> 00:24:33.910 align:start position:0%
pre-trial investigation is entirely
consistent<00:24:32.280><c> with</c><00:24:32.400><c> our</c><00:24:32.480><c> notion</c><00:24:32.760><c> of</c><00:24:32.880><c> alibis,</c>

00:24:33.910 --> 00:24:33.920 align:start position:0%
consistent with our notion of alibis,
 

00:24:33.920 --> 00:24:36.590 align:start position:0%
consistent with our notion of alibis,
that<00:24:34.120><c> they</c><00:24:34.280><c> are</c><00:24:34.480><c> usually</c><00:24:35.440><c> false,</c><00:24:36.240><c> which</c>

00:24:36.590 --> 00:24:36.600 align:start position:0%
that they are usually false, which
 

00:24:36.600 --> 00:24:39.550 align:start position:0%
that they are usually false, which
sucks,<00:24:37.200><c> you</c><00:24:37.320><c> guys.</c><00:24:38.520><c> They</c><00:24:38.800><c> aren't</c><00:24:39.080><c> usually</c>

00:24:39.550 --> 00:24:39.560 align:start position:0%
sucks, you guys. They aren't usually
 

00:24:39.560 --> 00:24:41.750 align:start position:0%
sucks, you guys. They aren't usually
false.<00:24:40.120><c> We</c><00:24:40.280><c> shouldn't</c><00:24:40.600><c> assume</c><00:24:41.120><c> that.</c><00:24:41.560><c> We</c>

00:24:41.750 --> 00:24:41.760 align:start position:0%
false. We shouldn't assume that. We
 

00:24:41.760 --> 00:24:44.830 align:start position:0%
false. We shouldn't assume that. We
should<00:24:42.000><c> take</c><00:24:42.720><c> every</c><00:24:43.080><c> alibi</c><00:24:44.040><c> for</c><00:24:44.280><c> face</c><00:24:44.560><c> value</c>

00:24:44.830 --> 00:24:44.840 align:start position:0%
should take every alibi for face value
 

00:24:44.840 --> 00:24:46.310 align:start position:0%
should take every alibi for face value
on<00:24:44.960><c> a</c><00:24:45.000><c> case-by-case</c><00:24:45.520><c> basis</c><00:24:45.800><c> without</c><00:24:46.080><c> any</c><00:24:46.240><c> of</c>

00:24:46.310 --> 00:24:46.320 align:start position:0%
on a case-by-case basis without any of
 

00:24:46.320 --> 00:24:48.430 align:start position:0%
on a case-by-case basis without any of
these<00:24:46.520><c> inherent</c><00:24:46.920><c> biases</c><00:24:47.400><c> in</c><00:24:47.520><c> the</c><00:24:47.600><c> past,</c>

00:24:48.430 --> 00:24:48.440 align:start position:0%
these inherent biases in the past,
 

00:24:48.440 --> 00:24:51.070 align:start position:0%
these inherent biases in the past,
without<00:24:48.800><c> thinking</c><00:24:49.160><c> of</c><00:24:49.280><c> all</c><00:24:49.480><c> of</c><00:24:49.560><c> the</c><00:24:49.680><c> episodes</c>

00:24:51.070 --> 00:24:51.080 align:start position:0%
without thinking of all of the episodes
 

00:24:51.080 --> 00:24:52.870 align:start position:0%
without thinking of all of the episodes
of<00:24:51.240><c> true</c><00:24:51.480><c> crime</c><00:24:51.880><c> or</c><00:24:52.040><c> all</c><00:24:52.200><c> of</c><00:24:52.280><c> the</c><00:24:52.400><c> famous</c>

00:24:52.870 --> 00:24:52.880 align:start position:0%
of true crime or all of the famous
 

00:24:52.880 --> 00:24:54.670 align:start position:0%
of true crime or all of the famous
trials<00:24:53.520><c> of</c><00:24:53.680><c> horrible</c><00:24:54.000><c> serial</c><00:24:54.240><c> killers</c><00:24:54.520><c> who</c>

00:24:54.670 --> 00:24:54.680 align:start position:0%
trials of horrible serial killers who
 

00:24:54.680 --> 00:24:57.110 align:start position:0%
trials of horrible serial killers who
also<00:24:55.120><c> presented</c><00:24:55.520><c> alibis</c><00:24:56.080><c> that</c><00:24:56.640><c> turned</c><00:24:56.880><c> out</c><00:24:57.000><c> to</c>

00:24:57.110 --> 00:24:57.120 align:start position:0%
also presented alibis that turned out to
 

00:24:57.120 --> 00:24:59.790 align:start position:0%
also presented alibis that turned out to
be<00:24:57.240><c> shambly.</c><00:24:57.760><c> Like,</c><00:24:58.000><c> hello.</c><00:24:59.080><c> God,</c><00:24:59.480><c> we</c><00:24:59.560><c> should</c>

00:24:59.790 --> 00:24:59.800 align:start position:0%
be shambly. Like, hello. God, we should
 

00:24:59.800 --> 00:25:03.030 align:start position:0%
be shambly. Like, hello. God, we should
come<00:25:00.120><c> to</c><00:25:00.240><c> trial</c><00:25:00.760><c> bearing</c><00:25:01.120><c> in</c><00:25:01.240><c> mind</c><00:25:02.000><c> the</c><00:25:02.280><c> issues</c>

00:25:03.030 --> 00:25:03.040 align:start position:0%
come to trial bearing in mind the issues
 

00:25:03.040 --> 00:25:06.470 align:start position:0%
come to trial bearing in mind the issues
and<00:25:03.240><c> inconsistencies</c><00:25:04.520><c> and</c><00:25:04.840><c> imperfectness</c><00:25:06.240><c> of</c>

00:25:06.470 --> 00:25:06.480 align:start position:0%
and inconsistencies and imperfectness of
 

00:25:06.480 --> 00:25:08.710 align:start position:0%
and inconsistencies and imperfectness of
human<00:25:06.920><c> memory,</c><00:25:07.400><c> period.</c><00:25:08.040><c> Memories</c><00:25:08.480><c> about</c>

00:25:08.710 --> 00:25:08.720 align:start position:0%
human memory, period. Memories about
 

00:25:08.720 --> 00:25:10.470 align:start position:0%
human memory, period. Memories about
your<00:25:08.840><c> own</c><00:25:09.040><c> actions,</c><00:25:09.880><c> memories</c><00:25:10.240><c> about</c><00:25:10.440><c> a</c>

00:25:10.470 --> 00:25:10.480 align:start position:0%
your own actions, memories about a
 

00:25:10.480 --> 00:25:13.550 align:start position:0%
your own actions, memories about a
stranger's<00:25:11.640><c> actions</c><00:25:12.160><c> for</c><00:25:12.360><c> sure.</c><00:25:12.840><c> But,</c><00:25:13.040><c> no.</c>

00:25:13.550 --> 00:25:13.560 align:start position:0%
stranger's actions for sure. But, no.
 

00:25:13.560 --> 00:25:15.070 align:start position:0%
stranger's actions for sure. But, no.
Oftentimes,<00:25:14.040><c> juries</c><00:25:14.320><c> don't.</c><00:25:14.640><c> And</c><00:25:14.760><c> that</c><00:25:14.920><c> is</c>

00:25:15.070 --> 00:25:15.080 align:start position:0%
Oftentimes, juries don't. And that is
 

00:25:15.080 --> 00:25:17.790 align:start position:0%
Oftentimes, juries don't. And that is
why<00:25:15.440><c> the</c><00:25:15.600><c> myth</c><00:25:15.800><c> of</c><00:25:15.920><c> the</c><00:25:16.040><c> alibi</c><00:25:16.680><c> is</c><00:25:16.920><c> more</c><00:25:17.120><c> truth</c>

00:25:17.790 --> 00:25:17.800 align:start position:0%
why the myth of the alibi is more truth
 

00:25:17.800 --> 00:25:19.630 align:start position:0%
why the myth of the alibi is more truth
than<00:25:18.240><c> allegory.</c><00:25:19.040><c> But,</c><00:25:19.200><c> there</c><00:25:19.320><c> is</c><00:25:19.400><c> another</c>

00:25:19.630 --> 00:25:19.640 align:start position:0%
than allegory. But, there is another
 

00:25:19.640 --> 00:25:23.390 align:start position:0%
than allegory. But, there is another
explanation<00:25:20.600><c> to</c><00:25:20.840><c> possibly</c><00:25:21.400><c> explain</c><00:25:22.120><c> why</c><00:25:22.680><c> even</c>

00:25:23.390 --> 00:25:23.400 align:start position:0%
explanation to possibly explain why even
 

00:25:23.400 --> 00:25:25.230 align:start position:0%
explanation to possibly explain why even
potentially<00:25:23.880><c> an</c><00:25:23.960><c> airtight</c><00:25:24.320><c> alibi</c><00:25:25.040><c> wouldn't</c>

00:25:25.230 --> 00:25:25.240 align:start position:0%
potentially an airtight alibi wouldn't
 

00:25:25.240 --> 00:25:26.950 align:start position:0%
potentially an airtight alibi wouldn't
necessarily<00:25:25.760><c> mean</c><00:25:26.000><c> a</c><00:25:26.040><c> prosecutor</c><00:25:26.560><c> is</c><00:25:26.680><c> going</c>

00:25:26.950 --> 00:25:26.960 align:start position:0%
necessarily mean a prosecutor is going
 

00:25:26.960 --> 00:25:29.270 align:start position:0%
necessarily mean a prosecutor is going
to<00:25:27.080><c> dismiss</c><00:25:27.440><c> the</c><00:25:27.560><c> case.</c><00:25:28.280><c> And</c><00:25:28.400><c> that</c><00:25:28.600><c> is</c><00:25:28.960><c> tunnel</c>

00:25:29.270 --> 00:25:29.280 align:start position:0%
to dismiss the case. And that is tunnel
 

00:25:29.280 --> 00:25:32.030 align:start position:0%
to dismiss the case. And that is tunnel
vision<00:25:29.960><c> and</c><00:25:30.280><c> investigative</c><00:25:31.320><c> bias.</c><00:25:31.840><c> Once</c>

00:25:32.030 --> 00:25:32.040 align:start position:0%
vision and investigative bias. Once
 

00:25:32.040 --> 00:25:33.870 align:start position:0%
vision and investigative bias. Once
prosecutors<00:25:32.480><c> have</c><00:25:32.600><c> filed</c><00:25:32.840><c> charges</c><00:25:33.440><c> and</c><00:25:33.600><c> begun</c>

00:25:33.870 --> 00:25:33.880 align:start position:0%
prosecutors have filed charges and begun
 

00:25:33.880 --> 00:25:35.230 align:start position:0%
prosecutors have filed charges and begun
to<00:25:33.960><c> prepare</c><00:25:34.240><c> their</c><00:25:34.440><c> case,</c><00:25:34.920><c> they</c><00:25:35.040><c> have</c>

00:25:35.230 --> 00:25:35.240 align:start position:0%
to prepare their case, they have
 

00:25:35.240 --> 00:25:37.070 align:start position:0%
to prepare their case, they have
likewise<00:25:35.640><c> concluded</c><00:25:36.240><c> that</c><00:25:36.360><c> the</c><00:25:36.440><c> defendant</c><00:25:36.960><c> is</c>

00:25:37.070 --> 00:25:37.080 align:start position:0%
likewise concluded that the defendant is
 

00:25:37.080 --> 00:25:39.510 align:start position:0%
likewise concluded that the defendant is
guilty.<00:25:37.720><c> Quote,</c><00:25:38.200><c> when</c><00:25:38.400><c> police</c><00:25:38.800><c> form</c><00:25:39.040><c> a</c><00:25:39.160><c> hunch</c>

00:25:39.510 --> 00:25:39.520 align:start position:0%
guilty. Quote, when police form a hunch
 

00:25:39.520 --> 00:25:41.230 align:start position:0%
guilty. Quote, when police form a hunch
that<00:25:39.680><c> a</c><00:25:39.720><c> suspect</c><00:25:40.120><c> is</c><00:25:40.240><c> guilty,</c><00:25:40.640><c> they</c><00:25:40.800><c> may</c><00:25:41.000><c> then,</c>

00:25:41.230 --> 00:25:41.240 align:start position:0%
that a suspect is guilty, they may then,
 

00:25:41.240 --> 00:25:43.950 align:start position:0%
that a suspect is guilty, they may then,
without<00:25:41.600><c> realizing</c><00:25:42.080><c> it,</c><00:25:42.600><c> discount</c><00:25:43.520><c> any</c>

00:25:43.950 --> 00:25:43.960 align:start position:0%
without realizing it, discount any
 

00:25:43.960 --> 00:25:46.150 align:start position:0%
without realizing it, discount any
evidence<00:25:44.480><c> that</c><00:25:44.680><c> does</c><00:25:44.840><c> not</c><00:25:45.120><c> jibe</c><00:25:45.760><c> with</c><00:25:46.000><c> their</c>

00:25:46.150 --> 00:25:46.160 align:start position:0%
evidence that does not jibe with their
 

00:25:46.160 --> 00:25:48.230 align:start position:0%
evidence that does not jibe with their
prior<00:25:46.480><c> belief</c><00:25:46.960><c> in</c><00:25:47.080><c> the</c><00:25:47.160><c> suspect's</c><00:25:47.680><c> guilt.</c>

00:25:48.230 --> 00:25:48.240 align:start position:0%
prior belief in the suspect's guilt.
 

00:25:48.240 --> 00:25:50.470 align:start position:0%
prior belief in the suspect's guilt.
Another<00:25:48.520><c> quote,</c><00:25:49.040><c> the</c><00:25:49.280><c> prosecutorial</c><00:25:50.040><c> role</c>

00:25:50.470 --> 00:25:50.480 align:start position:0%
Another quote, the prosecutorial role
 

00:25:50.480 --> 00:25:52.190 align:start position:0%
Another quote, the prosecutorial role
inevitably<00:25:50.920><c> fosters</c><00:25:51.360><c> tunnel</c><00:25:51.600><c> vision.</c>

00:25:52.190 --> 00:25:52.200 align:start position:0%
inevitably fosters tunnel vision.
 

00:25:52.200 --> 00:25:53.750 align:start position:0%
inevitably fosters tunnel vision.
Ethical<00:25:52.480><c> prosecutors</c><00:25:53.000><c> feel</c><00:25:53.160><c> a</c><00:25:53.240><c> pressure</c><00:25:53.640><c> to</c>

00:25:53.750 --> 00:25:53.760 align:start position:0%
Ethical prosecutors feel a pressure to
 

00:25:53.760 --> 00:25:55.630 align:start position:0%
Ethical prosecutors feel a pressure to
push<00:25:54.000><c> hard</c><00:25:54.480><c> to</c><00:25:54.600><c> obtain</c><00:25:55.000><c> convictions</c><00:25:55.400><c> because</c>

00:25:55.630 --> 00:25:55.640 align:start position:0%
push hard to obtain convictions because
 

00:25:55.640 --> 00:25:58.270 align:start position:0%
push hard to obtain convictions because
only<00:25:55.920><c> a</c><00:25:56.040><c> conviction</c><00:25:57.480><c> serves</c><00:25:57.840><c> the</c><00:25:57.960><c> interests</c>

00:25:58.270 --> 00:25:58.280 align:start position:0%
only a conviction serves the interests
 

00:25:58.280 --> 00:26:01.870 align:start position:0%
only a conviction serves the interests
of<00:25:58.360><c> justice.</c><00:25:59.480><c> But,</c><00:26:00.000><c> wrongful</c><00:26:00.560><c> convictions,</c>

00:26:01.870 --> 00:26:01.880 align:start position:0%
of justice. But, wrongful convictions,
 

00:26:01.880 --> 00:26:05.070 align:start position:0%
of justice. But, wrongful convictions,
they<00:26:02.080><c> don't</c><00:26:02.320><c> really</c><00:26:02.600><c> factor</c><00:26:03.120><c> in</c><00:26:04.040><c> to</c><00:26:04.320><c> that</c>

00:26:05.070 --> 00:26:05.080 align:start position:0%
they don't really factor in to that
 

00:26:05.080 --> 00:26:08.430 align:start position:0%
they don't really factor in to that
outcome,<00:26:05.800><c> to</c><00:26:06.080><c> that</c><00:26:06.800><c> decision-making,</c>

00:26:08.430 --> 00:26:08.440 align:start position:0%
outcome, to that decision-making,
 

00:26:08.440 --> 00:26:11.790 align:start position:0%
outcome, to that decision-making,
to<00:26:08.960><c> that</c><00:26:09.840><c> conclusion,</c><00:26:10.680><c> right?</c><00:26:11.200><c> Why</c><00:26:11.480><c> would</c><00:26:11.680><c> we</c>

00:26:11.790 --> 00:26:11.800 align:start position:0%
to that conclusion, right? Why would we
 

00:26:11.800 --> 00:26:12.870 align:start position:0%
to that conclusion, right? Why would we
care<00:26:12.000><c> about</c><00:26:12.160><c> a</c><00:26:12.200><c> wrongful</c><00:26:12.440><c> conviction?</c><00:26:12.800><c> A</c>

00:26:12.870 --> 00:26:12.880 align:start position:0%
care about a wrongful conviction? A
 

00:26:12.880 --> 00:26:14.710 align:start position:0%
care about a wrongful conviction? A
conviction<00:26:13.360><c> period,</c><00:26:13.800><c> baby.</c><00:26:14.200><c> That's</c><00:26:14.440><c> all</c><00:26:14.600><c> we</c>

00:26:14.710 --> 00:26:14.720 align:start position:0%
conviction period, baby. That's all we
 

00:26:14.720 --> 00:26:17.550 align:start position:0%
conviction period, baby. That's all we
need<00:26:15.520><c> to</c><00:26:15.640><c> say</c><00:26:15.800><c> that</c><00:26:16.080><c> it</c><00:26:16.200><c> was</c><00:26:16.360><c> a</c><00:26:16.400><c> job</c><00:26:16.720><c> well</c><00:26:16.880><c> done.</c>

00:26:17.550 --> 00:26:17.560 align:start position:0%
need to say that it was a job well done.
 

00:26:17.560 --> 00:26:18.750 align:start position:0%
need to say that it was a job well done.
This<00:26:17.760><c> is</c><00:26:17.880><c> why</c><00:26:18.080><c> I</c><00:26:18.160><c> could</c><00:26:18.400><c> never</c><00:26:18.600><c> be</c><00:26:18.720><c> a</c>

00:26:18.750 --> 00:26:18.760 align:start position:0%
This is why I could never be a
 

00:26:18.760 --> 00:26:20.630 align:start position:0%
This is why I could never be a
prosecutor.<00:26:19.720><c> I</c><00:26:19.840><c> know</c><00:26:19.960><c> that</c><00:26:20.200><c> prosecutors</c>

00:26:20.630 --> 00:26:20.640 align:start position:0%
prosecutor. I know that prosecutors
 

00:26:20.640 --> 00:26:23.070 align:start position:0%
prosecutor. I know that prosecutors
follow<00:26:20.880><c> me,</c><00:26:21.000><c> listen</c><00:26:21.160><c> to</c><00:26:21.200><c> this</c><00:26:21.320><c> podcast.</c><00:26:22.400><c> Um</c>

00:26:23.070 --> 00:26:23.080 align:start position:0%
follow me, listen to this podcast. Um
 

00:26:23.080 --> 00:26:27.430 align:start position:0%
follow me, listen to this podcast. Um
I<00:26:23.240><c> just</c><00:26:24.200><c> I</c><00:26:24.680><c> I</c><00:26:25.120><c> I</c><00:26:25.840><c> in</c><00:26:25.960><c> a</c><00:26:26.000><c> documentary</c>

00:26:27.430 --> 00:26:27.440 align:start position:0%
I just I I I in a documentary
 

00:26:27.440 --> 00:26:29.630 align:start position:0%
I just I I I in a documentary
uh<00:26:27.560><c> The</c><00:26:27.720><c> Jinx,</c>

00:26:29.630 --> 00:26:29.640 align:start position:0%
uh The Jinx,
 

00:26:29.640 --> 00:26:31.350 align:start position:0%
uh The Jinx,
uh<00:26:29.800><c> if</c><00:26:29.920><c> you've</c><00:26:30.280><c> seen</c><00:26:30.560><c> it,</c><00:26:30.680><c> it</c><00:26:30.760><c> is</c><00:26:30.880><c> a</c><00:26:30.960><c> six-part</c>

00:26:31.350 --> 00:26:31.360 align:start position:0%
uh if you've seen it, it is a six-part
 

00:26:31.360 --> 00:26:32.710 align:start position:0%
uh if you've seen it, it is a six-part
series,<00:26:31.800><c> and</c><00:26:32.120><c> one</c><00:26:32.240><c> of</c><00:26:32.320><c> the</c><00:26:32.440><c> defense</c>

00:26:32.710 --> 00:26:32.720 align:start position:0%
series, and one of the defense
 

00:26:32.720 --> 00:26:34.590 align:start position:0%
series, and one of the defense
attorneys,<00:26:33.160><c> it's</c><00:26:33.280><c> in</c><00:26:33.360><c> episode</c><00:26:33.760><c> one,</c><00:26:34.280><c> is</c>

00:26:34.590 --> 00:26:34.600 align:start position:0%
attorneys, it's in episode one, is
 

00:26:34.600 --> 00:26:35.910 align:start position:0%
attorneys, it's in episode one, is
talking<00:26:34.920><c> about,</c><00:26:35.200><c> right,</c><00:26:35.400><c> their</c><00:26:35.520><c> background.</c>

00:26:35.910 --> 00:26:35.920 align:start position:0%
talking about, right, their background.
 

00:26:35.920 --> 00:26:37.710 align:start position:0%
talking about, right, their background.
And<00:26:36.040><c> they</c><00:26:36.160><c> said,</c><00:26:36.880><c> "You</c><00:26:37.000><c> know,</c><00:26:37.160><c> I</c><00:26:37.280><c> spent</c><00:26:37.560><c> x</c>

00:26:37.710 --> 00:26:37.720 align:start position:0%
And they said, "You know, I spent x
 

00:26:37.720 --> 00:26:39.990 align:start position:0%
And they said, "You know, I spent x
amount<00:26:37.920><c> of</c><00:26:37.960><c> years</c><00:26:38.160><c> as</c><00:26:38.280><c> a</c><00:26:38.320><c> prosecutor</c><00:26:38.920><c> before</c><00:26:39.840><c> I</c>

00:26:39.990 --> 00:26:40.000 align:start position:0%
amount of years as a prosecutor before I
 

00:26:40.000 --> 00:26:42.150 align:start position:0%
amount of years as a prosecutor before I
finally<00:26:40.520><c> saw</c><00:26:40.760><c> the</c><00:26:40.960><c> light."</c><00:26:41.440><c> Finally</c><00:26:41.880><c> seeing</c>

00:26:42.150 --> 00:26:42.160 align:start position:0%
finally saw the light." Finally seeing
 

00:26:42.160 --> 00:26:43.510 align:start position:0%
finally saw the light." Finally seeing
the<00:26:42.280><c> light.</c>

00:26:43.510 --> 00:26:43.520 align:start position:0%
the light.
 

00:26:43.520 --> 00:26:46.030 align:start position:0%
the light.
I<00:26:43.720><c> hope</c><00:26:43.960><c> that</c><00:26:44.160><c> more</c><00:26:44.280><c> prosecutors</c><00:26:44.960><c> do.</c><00:26:45.720><c> But,</c><00:26:45.960><c> if</c>

00:26:46.030 --> 00:26:46.040 align:start position:0%
I hope that more prosecutors do. But, if
 

00:26:46.040 --> 00:26:47.470 align:start position:0%
I hope that more prosecutors do. But, if
you're<00:26:46.120><c> a</c><00:26:46.160><c> prosecutor</c><00:26:46.560><c> and</c><00:26:46.680><c> you</c><00:26:46.760><c> want</c><00:26:46.920><c> to</c><00:26:47.200><c> wax</c>

00:26:47.470 --> 00:26:47.480 align:start position:0%
you're a prosecutor and you want to wax
 

00:26:47.480 --> 00:26:49.270 align:start position:0%
you're a prosecutor and you want to wax
poetic<00:26:47.760><c> in</c><00:26:47.840><c> my</c><00:26:47.960><c> comments,</c><00:26:48.520><c> you</c><00:26:48.600><c> know,</c><00:26:48.920><c> that's</c>

00:26:49.270 --> 00:26:49.280 align:start position:0%
poetic in my comments, you know, that's
 

00:26:49.280 --> 00:26:53.928 align:start position:0%
poetic in my comments, you know, that's
fine.<00:26:49.880><c> My</c><00:26:50.440><c> subjective</c><00:26:51.800><c> opinions</c><00:26:52.720><c> based</c><00:26:53.120><c> on</c>

00:26:53.928 --> 00:26:53.938 align:start position:0%
fine. My subjective opinions based on
 

00:26:53.938 --> 00:26:54.670 align:start position:0%
fine. My subjective opinions based on
&gt;&gt; [laughter]

00:26:54.670 --> 00:26:54.680 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; [laughter]
 

00:26:54.680 --> 00:26:56.510 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; [laughter]
&gt;&gt; research<00:26:55.320><c> and</c><00:26:55.480><c> evidence</c><00:26:55.880><c> and</c><00:26:56.000><c> statistics</c><00:26:56.440><c> and</c>

00:26:56.510 --> 00:26:56.520 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; research and evidence and statistics and
 

00:26:56.520 --> 00:26:59.550 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; research and evidence and statistics and
studies<00:26:57.120><c> and</c><00:26:57.280><c> my</c><00:26:57.520><c> own</c><00:26:57.960><c> experience</c>

00:26:59.550 --> 00:26:59.560 align:start position:0%
studies and my own experience
 

00:26:59.560 --> 00:27:01.550 align:start position:0%
studies and my own experience
with<00:26:59.760><c> prosecutors</c><00:27:00.200><c> generally</c><00:27:00.760><c> and</c><00:27:01.080><c> also</c><00:27:01.400><c> my</c>

00:27:01.550 --> 00:27:01.560 align:start position:0%
with prosecutors generally and also my
 

00:27:01.560 --> 00:27:03.110 align:start position:0%
with prosecutors generally and also my
relationship<00:27:02.200><c> to</c><00:27:02.600><c> being</c><00:27:02.800><c> a</c><00:27:02.840><c> defense</c>

00:27:03.110 --> 00:27:03.120 align:start position:0%
relationship to being a defense
 

00:27:03.120 --> 00:27:04.990 align:start position:0%
relationship to being a defense
attorney.<00:27:03.560><c> Well,</c><00:27:03.680><c> everything</c><00:27:04.040><c> about</c><00:27:04.280><c> me</c>

00:27:04.990 --> 00:27:05.000 align:start position:0%
attorney. Well, everything about me
 

00:27:05.000 --> 00:27:07.430 align:start position:0%
attorney. Well, everything about me
screams<00:27:05.720><c> defense,</c><00:27:06.360><c> okay?</c><00:27:06.840><c> So,</c><00:27:07.040><c> don't</c><00:27:07.280><c> get</c>

00:27:07.430 --> 00:27:07.440 align:start position:0%
screams defense, okay? So, don't get
 

00:27:07.440 --> 00:27:09.630 align:start position:0%
screams defense, okay? So, don't get
offended.<00:27:08.360><c> It</c><00:27:08.560><c> is</c><00:27:08.680><c> not</c><00:27:08.920><c> always</c><00:27:09.200><c> a</c><00:27:09.280><c> personal</c>

00:27:09.630 --> 00:27:09.640 align:start position:0%
offended. It is not always a personal
 

00:27:09.640 --> 00:27:12.910 align:start position:0%
offended. It is not always a personal
attack,<00:27:09.960><c> my</c><00:27:10.120><c> god.</c><00:27:10.680><c> And</c><00:27:11.680><c> And</c><00:27:12.080><c> to</c><00:27:12.240><c> add</c><00:27:12.720><c> to</c><00:27:12.800><c> the</c>

00:27:12.910 --> 00:27:12.920 align:start position:0%
attack, my god. And And to add to the
 

00:27:12.920 --> 00:27:15.430 align:start position:0%
attack, my god. And And to add to the
disappointment<00:27:13.760><c> and</c><00:27:13.880><c> inherent</c><00:27:14.520><c> side-eying</c>

00:27:15.430 --> 00:27:15.440 align:start position:0%
disappointment and inherent side-eying
 

00:27:15.440 --> 00:27:17.670 align:start position:0%
disappointment and inherent side-eying
we<00:27:15.560><c> are</c><00:27:15.640><c> doing</c><00:27:15.920><c> to</c><00:27:16.040><c> the</c><00:27:16.120><c> system,</c><00:27:16.960><c> similar</c>

00:27:17.670 --> 00:27:17.680 align:start position:0%
we are doing to the system, similar
 

00:27:17.680 --> 00:27:19.470 align:start position:0%
we are doing to the system, similar
confirmation<00:27:18.280><c> bias</c><00:27:18.600><c> issues</c><00:27:19.000><c> may</c><00:27:19.120><c> affect</c>

00:27:19.470 --> 00:27:19.480 align:start position:0%
confirmation bias issues may affect
 

00:27:19.480 --> 00:27:21.670 align:start position:0%
confirmation bias issues may affect
judges<00:27:19.840><c> considering</c><00:27:20.320><c> the</c><00:27:20.440><c> effect</c><00:27:21.200><c> of</c><00:27:21.360><c> alibi</c>

00:27:21.670 --> 00:27:21.680 align:start position:0%
judges considering the effect of alibi
 

00:27:21.680 --> 00:27:23.190 align:start position:0%
judges considering the effect of alibi
witnesses<00:27:22.240><c> on</c><00:27:22.360><c> the</c><00:27:22.440><c> strength</c><00:27:23.000><c> of</c><00:27:23.120><c> the</c>

00:27:23.190 --> 00:27:23.200 align:start position:0%
witnesses on the strength of the
 

00:27:23.200 --> 00:27:25.950 align:start position:0%
witnesses on the strength of the
prosecution's<00:27:23.760><c> case</c><00:27:24.000><c> on</c><00:27:24.120><c> appeal</c><00:27:25.040><c> and</c><00:27:25.640><c> whether</c>

00:27:25.950 --> 00:27:25.960 align:start position:0%
prosecution's case on appeal and whether
 

00:27:25.960 --> 00:27:28.110 align:start position:0%
prosecution's case on appeal and whether
trial<00:27:26.360><c> counsel</c><00:27:26.920><c> was</c><00:27:27.080><c> ineffective</c><00:27:27.720><c> for</c><00:27:27.840><c> not</c>

00:27:28.110 --> 00:27:28.120 align:start position:0%
trial counsel was ineffective for not
 

00:27:28.120 --> 00:27:30.110 align:start position:0%
trial counsel was ineffective for not
pursuing<00:27:28.600><c> or</c><00:27:28.800><c> offering</c><00:27:29.160><c> alibi</c><00:27:29.480><c> witnesses</c><00:27:30.000><c> in</c>

00:27:30.110 --> 00:27:30.120 align:start position:0%
pursuing or offering alibi witnesses in
 

00:27:30.120 --> 00:27:32.710 align:start position:0%
pursuing or offering alibi witnesses in
a<00:27:30.200><c> habeas</c><00:27:30.720><c> case.</c><00:27:31.760><c> If</c><00:27:31.920><c> the</c><00:27:32.000><c> police</c><00:27:32.560><c> or</c>

00:27:32.710 --> 00:27:32.720 align:start position:0%
a habeas case. If the police or
 

00:27:32.720 --> 00:27:34.270 align:start position:0%
a habeas case. If the police or
prosecutor<00:27:33.200><c> are</c><00:27:33.360><c> convinced</c><00:27:34.080><c> that</c><00:27:34.200><c> the</c>

00:27:34.270 --> 00:27:34.280 align:start position:0%
prosecutor are convinced that the
 

00:27:34.280 --> 00:27:35.990 align:start position:0%
prosecutor are convinced that the
defendant<00:27:34.680><c> is</c><00:27:34.800><c> guilty,</c><00:27:35.320><c> then</c><00:27:35.440><c> the</c><00:27:35.640><c> alibi</c>

00:27:35.990 --> 00:27:36.000 align:start position:0%
defendant is guilty, then the alibi
 

00:27:36.000 --> 00:27:39.550 align:start position:0%
defendant is guilty, then the alibi
witness<00:27:36.600><c> must</c><00:27:37.000><c> be</c><00:27:37.360><c> either</c><00:27:37.680><c> liars</c><00:27:38.600><c> or</c><00:27:38.840><c> wrong.</c>

00:27:39.550 --> 00:27:39.560 align:start position:0%
witness must be either liars or wrong.
 

00:27:39.560 --> 00:27:41.070 align:start position:0%
witness must be either liars or wrong.
Disbelieving<00:27:40.000><c> investigators</c><00:27:40.560><c> may</c><00:27:40.680><c> subject</c>

00:27:41.070 --> 00:27:41.080 align:start position:0%
Disbelieving investigators may subject
 

00:27:41.080 --> 00:27:43.190 align:start position:0%
Disbelieving investigators may subject
alibi<00:27:41.360><c> witnesses</c><00:27:41.920><c> to</c><00:27:42.160><c> coercive</c>

00:27:43.190 --> 00:27:43.200 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses to coercive
 

00:27:43.200 --> 00:27:44.430 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses to coercive
interrogation<00:27:43.719><c> [snorts]</c><00:27:43.880><c> methods,</c><00:27:44.240><c> which</c>

00:27:44.430 --> 00:27:44.440 align:start position:0%
interrogation [snorts] methods, which
 

00:27:44.440 --> 00:27:46.310 align:start position:0%
interrogation [snorts] methods, which
may<00:27:44.560><c> pressure</c><00:27:44.960><c> witnesses</c><00:27:45.400><c> to</c><00:27:45.560><c> retract</c><00:27:46.160><c> or</c>

00:27:46.310 --> 00:27:46.320 align:start position:0%
may pressure witnesses to retract or
 

00:27:46.320 --> 00:27:49.070 align:start position:0%
may pressure witnesses to retract or
hedge<00:27:46.840><c> the</c><00:27:47.040><c> alibi.</c><00:27:47.800><c> Police</c><00:27:48.200><c> or</c><00:27:48.320><c> prosecutors,</c>

00:27:49.070 --> 00:27:49.080 align:start position:0%
hedge the alibi. Police or prosecutors,
 

00:27:49.080 --> 00:27:51.830 align:start position:0%
hedge the alibi. Police or prosecutors,
and<00:27:49.240><c> this</c><00:27:49.480><c> isn't</c><00:27:50.040><c> conjecture,</c><00:27:50.720><c> either.</c><00:27:51.520><c> This</c>

00:27:51.830 --> 00:27:51.840 align:start position:0%
and this isn't conjecture, either. This
 

00:27:51.840 --> 00:27:54.030 align:start position:0%
and this isn't conjecture, either. This
is<00:27:52.440><c> Hey,</c><00:27:52.920><c> so</c><00:27:53.080><c> this</c><00:27:53.320><c> has</c><00:27:53.440><c> happened</c><00:27:53.760><c> before</c>

00:27:54.030 --> 00:27:54.040 align:start position:0%
is Hey, so this has happened before
 

00:27:54.040 --> 00:27:55.190 align:start position:0%
is Hey, so this has happened before
enough<00:27:54.320><c> that</c><00:27:54.480><c> we're</c><00:27:54.640><c> going</c><00:27:54.760><c> to</c><00:27:54.960><c> we're</c><00:27:55.080><c> going</c>

00:27:55.190 --> 00:27:55.200 align:start position:0%
enough that we're going to we're going
 

00:27:55.200 --> 00:27:57.230 align:start position:0%
enough that we're going to we're going
to<00:27:55.280><c> make</c><00:27:55.480><c> a</c><00:27:55.520><c> note</c><00:27:55.720><c> of</c><00:27:55.840><c> it</c><00:27:55.960><c> here.</c><00:27:56.760><c> Police</c><00:27:57.160><c> or</c>

00:27:57.230 --> 00:27:57.240 align:start position:0%
to make a note of it here. Police or
 

00:27:57.240 --> 00:27:59.950 align:start position:0%
to make a note of it here. Police or
prosecutors<00:27:57.800><c> may</c><00:27:58.040><c> threaten</c><00:27:59.200><c> alibi</c><00:27:59.520><c> witnesses</c>

00:27:59.950 --> 00:27:59.960 align:start position:0%
prosecutors may threaten alibi witnesses
 

00:27:59.960 --> 00:28:01.350 align:start position:0%
prosecutors may threaten alibi witnesses
with<00:28:00.080><c> prosecution</c><00:28:00.600><c> for</c><00:28:00.760><c> perjury</c><00:28:01.240><c> or</c>

00:28:01.350 --> 00:28:01.360 align:start position:0%
with prosecution for perjury or
 

00:28:01.360 --> 00:28:03.430 align:start position:0%
with prosecution for perjury or
obstruction<00:28:01.800><c> of</c><00:28:01.880><c> justice.</c>

00:28:03.430 --> 00:28:03.440 align:start position:0%
obstruction of justice.
 

00:28:03.440 --> 00:28:04.710 align:start position:0%
obstruction of justice.
Accurate,<00:28:03.800><c> truthful</c><00:28:04.080><c> witnesses</c><00:28:04.480><c> may</c><00:28:04.600><c> be</c>

00:28:04.710 --> 00:28:04.720 align:start position:0%
Accurate, truthful witnesses may be
 

00:28:04.720 --> 00:28:06.670 align:start position:0%
Accurate, truthful witnesses may be
intimidated<00:28:05.280><c> and</c><00:28:05.440><c> either</c><00:28:05.720><c> hedge</c><00:28:06.000><c> or</c><00:28:06.160><c> retract</c>

00:28:06.670 --> 00:28:06.680 align:start position:0%
intimidated and either hedge or retract
 

00:28:06.680 --> 00:28:08.790 align:start position:0%
intimidated and either hedge or retract
their<00:28:06.880><c> statements.</c><00:28:07.800><c> For</c><00:28:08.000><c> example,</c><00:28:08.640><c> in</c>

00:28:08.790 --> 00:28:08.800 align:start position:0%
their statements. For example, in
 

00:28:08.800 --> 00:28:12.030 align:start position:0%
their statements. For example, in
Illinois<00:28:09.520><c> in</c><00:28:09.720><c> People</c><00:28:10.000><c> versus</c><00:28:10.360><c> Hen</c><00:28:10.840><c> in</c><00:28:11.040><c> 1988,</c>

00:28:12.030 --> 00:28:12.040 align:start position:0%
Illinois in People versus Hen in 1988,
 

00:28:12.040 --> 00:28:14.510 align:start position:0%
Illinois in People versus Hen in 1988,
the<00:28:12.160><c> police</c><00:28:12.800><c> arrested</c><00:28:13.480><c> an</c><00:28:13.600><c> alibi</c><00:28:13.960><c> witness</c><00:28:14.360><c> and</c>

00:28:14.510 --> 00:28:14.520 align:start position:0%
the police arrested an alibi witness and
 

00:28:14.520 --> 00:28:16.150 align:start position:0%
the police arrested an alibi witness and
charged<00:28:14.920><c> her</c><00:28:15.040><c> with</c><00:28:15.160><c> obstruction</c><00:28:15.560><c> of</c><00:28:15.640><c> justice.</c>

00:28:16.150 --> 00:28:16.160 align:start position:0%
charged her with obstruction of justice.
 

00:28:16.160 --> 00:28:17.670 align:start position:0%
charged her with obstruction of justice.
The<00:28:16.280><c> witness</c><00:28:16.560><c> then</c><00:28:16.760><c> hedged</c><00:28:17.120><c> her</c><00:28:17.240><c> previous</c>

00:28:17.670 --> 00:28:17.680 align:start position:0%
The witness then hedged her previous
 

00:28:17.680 --> 00:28:19.950 align:start position:0%
The witness then hedged her previous
answers.<00:28:18.600><c> The</c><00:28:18.680><c> court</c><00:28:19.000><c> faulted</c><00:28:19.480><c> the</c><00:28:19.520><c> defense</c>

00:28:19.950 --> 00:28:19.960 align:start position:0%
answers. The court faulted the defense
 

00:28:19.960 --> 00:28:21.230 align:start position:0%
answers. The court faulted the defense
for<00:28:20.080><c> not</c><00:28:20.280><c> calling</c><00:28:20.520><c> the</c><00:28:20.600><c> alibi</c><00:28:20.880><c> witness</c><00:28:21.120><c> at</c>

00:28:21.230 --> 00:28:21.240 align:start position:0%
for not calling the alibi witness at
 

00:28:21.240 --> 00:28:23.110 align:start position:0%
for not calling the alibi witness at
trial,<00:28:21.600><c> quote,</c><00:28:22.160><c> "For</c><00:28:22.320><c> all</c><00:28:22.480><c> we</c><00:28:22.600><c> know,</c><00:28:22.880><c> she</c><00:28:23.000><c> did</c>

00:28:23.110 --> 00:28:23.120 align:start position:0%
trial, quote, "For all we know, she did
 

00:28:23.120 --> 00:28:24.950 align:start position:0%
trial, quote, "For all we know, she did
not<00:28:23.280><c> testify</c><00:28:23.680><c> due</c><00:28:23.800><c> to</c><00:28:23.920><c> her</c><00:28:24.080><c> susceptibility</c><00:28:24.880><c> of</c>

00:28:24.950 --> 00:28:24.960 align:start position:0%
not testify due to her susceptibility of
 

00:28:24.960 --> 00:28:26.710 align:start position:0%
not testify due to her susceptibility of
impeachment<00:28:25.760><c> by</c><00:28:25.920><c> her</c><00:28:26.120><c> inconsistent</c>

00:28:26.710 --> 00:28:26.720 align:start position:0%
impeachment by her inconsistent
 

00:28:26.720 --> 00:28:28.070 align:start position:0%
impeachment by her inconsistent
statements<00:28:27.160><c> or</c><00:28:27.360><c> was</c><00:28:27.520><c> not</c><00:28:27.680><c> called</c><00:28:27.880><c> by</c><00:28:28.000><c> the</c>

00:28:28.070 --> 00:28:28.080 align:start position:0%
statements or was not called by the
 

00:28:28.080 --> 00:28:29.430 align:start position:0%
statements or was not called by the
defendant<00:28:28.480><c> for</c><00:28:28.600><c> fear</c><00:28:28.840><c> of</c><00:28:28.920><c> her</c><00:28:29.040><c> truthful</c>

00:28:29.430 --> 00:28:29.440 align:start position:0%
defendant for fear of her truthful
 

00:28:29.440 --> 00:28:32.270 align:start position:0%
defendant for fear of her truthful
answers."<00:28:30.240><c> And</c><00:28:30.640><c> also</c><00:28:31.040><c> note,</c>

00:28:32.270 --> 00:28:32.280 align:start position:0%
answers." And also note,
 

00:28:32.280 --> 00:28:35.990 align:start position:0%
answers." And also note,
over<00:28:32.800><c> half</c><00:28:33.600><c> of</c><00:28:33.800><c> witnesses,</c><00:28:34.560><c> alibi</c><00:28:35.000><c> witnesses,</c>

00:28:35.990 --> 00:28:36.000 align:start position:0%
over half of witnesses, alibi witnesses,
 

00:28:36.000 --> 00:28:39.150 align:start position:0%
over half of witnesses, alibi witnesses,
retracted<00:28:36.920><c> an</c><00:28:37.120><c> alibi</c><00:28:37.680><c> when</c><00:28:37.960><c> falsely</c><00:28:38.800><c> told</c>

00:28:39.150 --> 00:28:39.160 align:start position:0%
retracted an alibi when falsely told
 

00:28:39.160 --> 00:28:42.270 align:start position:0%
retracted an alibi when falsely told
that<00:28:39.280><c> an</c><00:28:39.400><c> innocent</c><00:28:40.240><c> confederate</c><00:28:41.080><c> confessed.</c>

00:28:42.270 --> 00:28:42.280 align:start position:0%
that an innocent confederate confessed.
 

00:28:42.280 --> 00:28:44.510 align:start position:0%
that an innocent confederate confessed.
Falsely<00:28:42.720><c> told.</c><00:28:43.400><c> So,</c><00:28:43.840><c> again,</c><00:28:44.120><c> the</c><00:28:44.200><c> police</c><00:28:44.400><c> can</c>

00:28:44.510 --> 00:28:44.520 align:start position:0%
Falsely told. So, again, the police can
 

00:28:44.520 --> 00:28:45.830 align:start position:0%
Falsely told. So, again, the police can
lie<00:28:44.640><c> to</c><00:28:44.720><c> you</c><00:28:44.800><c> about</c><00:28:45.240><c> literally</c><00:28:45.600><c> almost</c>

00:28:45.830 --> 00:28:45.840 align:start position:0%
lie to you about literally almost
 

00:28:45.840 --> 00:28:48.190 align:start position:0%
lie to you about literally almost
anything.<00:28:46.680><c> Uh</c><00:28:46.960><c> and</c><00:28:47.160><c> if</c><00:28:47.360><c> you</c><00:28:47.720><c> are</c><00:28:47.840><c> the</c><00:28:47.960><c> alibi</c>

00:28:48.190 --> 00:28:48.200 align:start position:0%
anything. Uh and if you are the alibi
 

00:28:48.200 --> 00:28:49.870 align:start position:0%
anything. Uh and if you are the alibi
witness<00:28:48.640><c> and</c>

00:28:49.870 --> 00:28:49.880 align:start position:0%
witness and
 

00:28:49.880 --> 00:28:51.910 align:start position:0%
witness and
the<00:28:50.000><c> police</c><00:28:50.240><c> say,</c><00:28:50.440><c> "Hey."</c><00:28:51.360><c> So</c><00:28:51.520><c> actually</c><00:28:51.800><c> they</c>

00:28:51.910 --> 00:28:51.920 align:start position:0%
the police say, "Hey." So actually they
 

00:28:51.920 --> 00:28:53.390 align:start position:0%
the police say, "Hey." So actually they
literally<00:28:52.160><c> confess</c><00:28:52.440><c> to</c><00:28:52.560><c> it.</c><00:28:52.920><c> They</c><00:28:53.040><c> say,</c><00:28:53.280><c> "Oh,</c>

00:28:53.390 --> 00:28:53.400 align:start position:0%
literally confess to it. They say, "Oh,
 

00:28:53.400 --> 00:28:54.350 align:start position:0%
literally confess to it. They say, "Oh,
okay.<00:28:53.600><c> Then</c><00:28:53.720><c> never</c><00:28:53.880><c> mind.</c><00:28:54.000><c> I</c><00:28:54.040><c> must</c><00:28:54.200><c> have</c><00:28:54.280><c> been</c>

00:28:54.350 --> 00:28:54.360 align:start position:0%
okay. Then never mind. I must have been
 

00:28:54.360 --> 00:28:56.110 align:start position:0%
okay. Then never mind. I must have been
wrong.<00:28:54.560><c> Bye."</c><00:28:55.000><c> And</c><00:28:55.200><c> then</c><00:28:55.400><c> that</c><00:28:55.680><c> is</c><00:28:55.760><c> considered</c>

00:28:56.110 --> 00:28:56.120 align:start position:0%
wrong. Bye." And then that is considered
 

00:28:56.120 --> 00:28:58.710 align:start position:0%
wrong. Bye." And then that is considered
an<00:28:56.200><c> inconsistent</c><00:28:56.600><c> state.</c><00:28:56.800><c> Like</c><00:28:57.320><c> I</c><00:28:57.480><c> just</c><00:28:58.240><c> I</c>

00:28:58.710 --> 00:28:58.720 align:start position:0%
an inconsistent state. Like I just I
 

00:28:58.720 --> 00:29:00.790 align:start position:0%
an inconsistent state. Like I just I
Ooh,<00:28:59.000><c> I</c><00:28:59.160><c> hate</c><00:28:59.520><c> that.</c>

00:29:00.790 --> 00:29:00.800 align:start position:0%
Ooh, I hate that.
 

00:29:00.800 --> 00:29:02.790 align:start position:0%
Ooh, I hate that.
I<00:29:01.000><c> hate</c><00:29:01.480><c> that.</c><00:29:01.840><c> Even</c><00:29:02.080><c> more</c><00:29:02.240><c> subtle</c><00:29:02.480><c> methods</c>

00:29:02.790 --> 00:29:02.800 align:start position:0%
I hate that. Even more subtle methods
 

00:29:02.800 --> 00:29:04.070 align:start position:0%
I hate that. Even more subtle methods
can<00:29:02.960><c> lead</c><00:29:03.160><c> witnesses</c><00:29:03.520><c> to</c><00:29:03.640><c> retract</c><00:29:04.000><c> an</c>

00:29:04.070 --> 00:29:04.080 align:start position:0%
can lead witnesses to retract an
 

00:29:04.080 --> 00:29:06.070 align:start position:0%
can lead witnesses to retract an
accurate<00:29:04.520><c> truthful</c><00:29:05.040><c> alibi.</c><00:29:05.680><c> Witnesses</c>

00:29:06.070 --> 00:29:06.080 align:start position:0%
accurate truthful alibi. Witnesses
 

00:29:06.080 --> 00:29:07.670 align:start position:0%
accurate truthful alibi. Witnesses
exposed<00:29:06.480><c> to</c><00:29:06.560><c> incriminating</c><00:29:07.040><c> information</c><00:29:07.560><c> may</c>

00:29:07.670 --> 00:29:07.680 align:start position:0%
exposed to incriminating information may
 

00:29:07.680 --> 00:29:10.230 align:start position:0%
exposed to incriminating information may
doubt<00:29:07.960><c> their</c><00:29:08.200><c> own</c><00:29:08.440><c> memories</c><00:29:08.960><c> or</c><00:29:09.240><c> fear</c><00:29:10.000><c> being</c>

00:29:10.230 --> 00:29:10.240 align:start position:0%
doubt their own memories or fear being
 

00:29:10.240 --> 00:29:11.910 align:start position:0%
doubt their own memories or fear being
seen<00:29:10.480><c> as</c><00:29:10.680><c> lying</c><00:29:11.120><c> for</c><00:29:11.240><c> the</c><00:29:11.360><c> suspect</c><00:29:11.800><c> and</c>

00:29:11.910 --> 00:29:11.920 align:start position:0%
seen as lying for the suspect and
 

00:29:11.920 --> 00:29:14.150 align:start position:0%
seen as lying for the suspect and
prosecuted<00:29:12.440><c> and</c><00:29:12.600><c> soften</c><00:29:13.040><c> or</c><00:29:13.240><c> retract</c><00:29:14.040><c> an</c>

00:29:14.150 --> 00:29:14.160 align:start position:0%
prosecuted and soften or retract an
 

00:29:14.160 --> 00:29:17.030 align:start position:0%
prosecuted and soften or retract an
alibi.<00:29:14.720><c> Both</c><00:29:15.040><c> truthful</c><00:29:15.880><c> and</c><00:29:16.240><c> false</c><00:29:16.800><c> alibi</c>

00:29:17.030 --> 00:29:17.040 align:start position:0%
alibi. Both truthful and false alibi
 

00:29:17.040 --> 00:29:18.790 align:start position:0%
alibi. Both truthful and false alibi
witnesses<00:29:17.440><c> may</c><00:29:17.560><c> not</c><00:29:17.720><c> recognize</c><00:29:18.240><c> or</c><00:29:18.360><c> respond</c>

00:29:18.790 --> 00:29:18.800 align:start position:0%
witnesses may not recognize or respond
 

00:29:18.800 --> 00:29:20.750 align:start position:0%
witnesses may not recognize or respond
when<00:29:18.920><c> police</c><00:29:19.200><c> test</c><00:29:19.480><c> them</c><00:29:20.000><c> with</c><00:29:20.280><c> altered</c>

00:29:20.750 --> 00:29:20.760 align:start position:0%
when police test them with altered
 

00:29:20.760 --> 00:29:22.230 align:start position:0%
when police test them with altered
versions<00:29:21.160><c> of</c><00:29:21.320><c> earlier</c><00:29:21.640><c> alibi</c><00:29:21.920><c> statements,</c>

00:29:22.230 --> 00:29:22.240 align:start position:0%
versions of earlier alibi statements,
 

00:29:22.240 --> 00:29:25.150 align:start position:0%
versions of earlier alibi statements,
which<00:29:22.360><c> police</c><00:29:22.560><c> do</c><00:29:22.680><c> intentionally</c><00:29:23.520><c> to</c><00:29:23.680><c> try</c><00:29:24.120><c> to</c>

00:29:25.150 --> 00:29:25.160 align:start position:0%
which police do intentionally to try to
 

00:29:25.160 --> 00:29:27.030 align:start position:0%
which police do intentionally to try to
set<00:29:25.480><c> the</c><00:29:25.600><c> scene,</c><00:29:25.920><c> lay</c><00:29:26.080><c> the</c><00:29:26.160><c> foundation</c><00:29:26.800><c> to</c><00:29:26.920><c> be</c>

00:29:27.030 --> 00:29:27.040 align:start position:0%
set the scene, lay the foundation to be
 

00:29:27.040 --> 00:29:28.470 align:start position:0%
set the scene, lay the foundation to be
able<00:29:27.240><c> to</c><00:29:27.440><c> at</c><00:29:27.600><c> trial</c><00:29:27.960><c> say,</c><00:29:28.160><c> "Look</c><00:29:28.360><c> how</c>

00:29:28.470 --> 00:29:28.480 align:start position:0%
able to at trial say, "Look how
 

00:29:28.480 --> 00:29:29.990 align:start position:0%
able to at trial say, "Look how
inconsistent<00:29:29.080><c> all</c><00:29:29.200><c> your</c><00:29:29.320><c> statements</c><00:29:29.680><c> were."</c>

00:29:29.990 --> 00:29:30.000 align:start position:0%
inconsistent all your statements were."
 

00:29:30.000 --> 00:29:32.030 align:start position:0%
inconsistent all your statements were."
reality<00:29:30.400><c> the</c><00:29:30.520><c> police</c><00:29:30.760><c> were</c><00:29:30.840><c> just</c><00:29:31.640><c> twisting</c>

00:29:32.030 --> 00:29:32.040 align:start position:0%
reality the police were just twisting
 

00:29:32.040 --> 00:29:33.190 align:start position:0%
reality the police were just twisting
their<00:29:32.160><c> words</c><00:29:32.360><c> a</c><00:29:32.400><c> million</c><00:29:32.640><c> times</c><00:29:32.880><c> at</c><00:29:32.920><c> the</c><00:29:33.000><c> point</c>

00:29:33.190 --> 00:29:33.200 align:start position:0%
their words a million times at the point
 

00:29:33.200 --> 00:29:34.670 align:start position:0%
their words a million times at the point
where<00:29:33.280><c> they</c><00:29:33.360><c> were</c><00:29:33.440><c> like,</c><00:29:33.560><c> "Wait,</c><00:29:33.760><c> what?"</c><00:29:34.000><c> Like</c>

00:29:34.670 --> 00:29:34.680 align:start position:0%
where they were like, "Wait, what?" Like
 

00:29:34.680 --> 00:29:36.430 align:start position:0%
where they were like, "Wait, what?" Like
police<00:29:35.040><c> intentionally</c><00:29:35.520><c> confuse</c><00:29:36.200><c> alibi</c>

00:29:36.430 --> 00:29:36.440 align:start position:0%
police intentionally confuse alibi
 

00:29:36.440 --> 00:29:39.070 align:start position:0%
police intentionally confuse alibi
witnesses<00:29:37.040><c> because</c><00:29:37.320><c> again,</c><00:29:38.240><c> like</c><00:29:38.680><c> I</c><00:29:38.800><c> said</c>

00:29:39.070 --> 00:29:39.080 align:start position:0%
witnesses because again, like I said
 

00:29:39.080 --> 00:29:41.790 align:start position:0%
witnesses because again, like I said
previously,<00:29:40.200><c> convictions,</c><00:29:41.200><c> prosecutors</c>

00:29:41.790 --> 00:29:41.800 align:start position:0%
previously, convictions, prosecutors
 

00:29:41.800 --> 00:29:44.990 align:start position:0%
previously, convictions, prosecutors
believe<00:29:42.840><c> achieve</c><00:29:43.240><c> justice.</c><00:29:44.240><c> Not</c><00:29:44.520><c> rightful</c>

00:29:44.990 --> 00:29:45.000 align:start position:0%
believe achieve justice. Not rightful
 

00:29:45.000 --> 00:29:46.150 align:start position:0%
believe achieve justice. Not rightful
ones.

00:29:46.150 --> 00:29:46.160 align:start position:0%
ones.
 

00:29:46.160 --> 00:29:48.830 align:start position:0%
ones.
Not<00:29:46.480><c> honest</c><00:29:46.840><c> ones.</c><00:29:47.680><c> Just</c><00:29:47.920><c> convictions.</c>

00:29:48.830 --> 00:29:48.840 align:start position:0%
Not honest ones. Just convictions.
 

00:29:48.840 --> 00:29:51.110 align:start position:0%
Not honest ones. Just convictions.
Wrongful<00:29:49.240><c> or</c><00:29:49.360><c> not.</c><00:29:50.240><c> And</c><00:29:50.440><c> you</c><00:29:50.520><c> would</c><00:29:50.680><c> think,</c>

00:29:51.110 --> 00:29:51.120 align:start position:0%
Wrongful or not. And you would think,
 

00:29:51.120 --> 00:29:53.190 align:start position:0%
Wrongful or not. And you would think,
"Oh,<00:29:51.280><c> well,</c><00:29:51.920><c> if</c><00:29:52.040><c> they</c><00:29:52.200><c> really</c><00:29:52.560><c> did</c><00:29:52.840><c> see</c><00:29:53.000><c> that</c>

00:29:53.190 --> 00:29:53.200 align:start position:0%
"Oh, well, if they really did see that
 

00:29:53.200 --> 00:29:55.670 align:start position:0%
"Oh, well, if they really did see that
person<00:29:53.560><c> at</c><00:29:53.720><c> that</c><00:29:53.920><c> time,</c><00:29:54.560><c> if</c><00:29:54.680><c> they</c><00:29:54.840><c> really</c>

00:29:55.670 --> 00:29:55.680 align:start position:0%
person at that time, if they really
 

00:29:55.680 --> 00:29:56.950 align:start position:0%
person at that time, if they really
weren't<00:29:56.040><c> lying,</c><00:29:56.480><c> well,</c><00:29:56.600><c> wouldn't</c><00:29:56.840><c> they</c>

00:29:56.950 --> 00:29:56.960 align:start position:0%
weren't lying, well, wouldn't they
 

00:29:56.960 --> 00:29:58.870 align:start position:0%
weren't lying, well, wouldn't they
notice?<00:29:57.520><c> If</c><00:29:57.640><c> this</c><00:29:57.800><c> is</c><00:29:57.880><c> so</c><00:29:58.040><c> important</c><00:29:58.480><c> to</c><00:29:58.560><c> them,</c>

00:29:58.870 --> 00:29:58.880 align:start position:0%
notice? If this is so important to them,
 

00:29:58.880 --> 00:30:00.750 align:start position:0%
notice? If this is so important to them,
they're<00:29:59.000><c> going</c><00:29:59.640><c> testifying</c><00:30:00.200><c> in</c><00:30:00.280><c> court,</c>

00:30:00.750 --> 00:30:00.760 align:start position:0%
they're going testifying in court,
 

00:30:00.760 --> 00:30:02.310 align:start position:0%
they're going testifying in court,
that's<00:30:00.960><c> not</c><00:30:01.160><c> something</c><00:30:01.440><c> that</c><00:30:01.880><c> typically</c><00:30:02.240><c> a</c>

00:30:02.310 --> 00:30:02.320 align:start position:0%
that's not something that typically a
 

00:30:02.320 --> 00:30:04.510 align:start position:0%
that's not something that typically a
lot<00:30:02.440><c> of</c><00:30:02.520><c> people</c><00:30:02.760><c> do</c><00:30:03.080><c> all</c><00:30:03.200><c> the</c><00:30:03.360><c> time.</c><00:30:04.160><c> Wouldn't</c>

00:30:04.510 --> 00:30:04.520 align:start position:0%
lot of people do all the time. Wouldn't
 

00:30:04.520 --> 00:30:06.910 align:start position:0%
lot of people do all the time. Wouldn't
they<00:30:04.680><c> totally</c><00:30:05.560><c> notice</c><00:30:06.120><c> little</c><00:30:06.360><c> changes</c><00:30:06.840><c> that</c>

00:30:06.910 --> 00:30:06.920 align:start position:0%
they totally notice little changes that
 

00:30:06.920 --> 00:30:08.630 align:start position:0%
they totally notice little changes that
the<00:30:07.000><c> police</c><00:30:07.280><c> made</c><00:30:07.400><c> to</c><00:30:07.480><c> their</c><00:30:07.640><c> statements</c><00:30:08.440><c> in</c><00:30:08.560><c> a</c>

00:30:08.630 --> 00:30:08.640 align:start position:0%
the police made to their statements in a
 

00:30:08.640 --> 00:30:12.630 align:start position:0%
the police made to their statements in a
study<00:30:09.400><c> conducted</c><00:30:10.000><c> in</c><00:30:10.240><c> 2016,</c><00:30:11.720><c> it</c><00:30:11.920><c> found</c><00:30:12.480><c> that</c>

00:30:12.630 --> 00:30:12.640 align:start position:0%
study conducted in 2016, it found that
 

00:30:12.640 --> 00:30:15.390 align:start position:0%
study conducted in 2016, it found that
both<00:30:12.960><c> truthful</c><00:30:13.800><c> and</c><00:30:14.120><c> false</c><00:30:14.440><c> witnesses</c><00:30:15.240><c> were</c>

00:30:15.390 --> 00:30:15.400 align:start position:0%
both truthful and false witnesses were
 

00:30:15.400 --> 00:30:18.390 align:start position:0%
both truthful and false witnesses were
largely<00:30:15.880><c> blind</c><00:30:16.640><c> to</c><00:30:16.960><c> alterations</c><00:30:18.000><c> of</c><00:30:18.160><c> their</c>

00:30:18.390 --> 00:30:18.400 align:start position:0%
largely blind to alterations of their
 

00:30:18.400 --> 00:30:20.710 align:start position:0%
largely blind to alterations of their
alibi<00:30:18.720><c> statements</c><00:30:19.640><c> when</c><00:30:19.840><c> interviewed</c><00:30:20.440><c> a</c><00:30:20.520><c> few</c>

00:30:20.710 --> 00:30:20.720 align:start position:0%
alibi statements when interviewed a few
 

00:30:20.720 --> 00:30:22.510 align:start position:0%
alibi statements when interviewed a few
days<00:30:20.960><c> later,</c><00:30:21.400><c> leading</c><00:30:21.640><c> to</c><00:30:21.720><c> the</c><00:30:21.840><c> appearance</c><00:30:22.400><c> of</c>

00:30:22.510 --> 00:30:22.520 align:start position:0%
days later, leading to the appearance of
 

00:30:22.520 --> 00:30:24.990 align:start position:0%
days later, leading to the appearance of
inconsistency<00:30:23.760><c> for</c><00:30:23.960><c> both</c><00:30:24.440><c> kinds</c><00:30:24.880><c> of</c>

00:30:24.990 --> 00:30:25.000 align:start position:0%
inconsistency for both kinds of
 

00:30:25.000 --> 00:30:27.830 align:start position:0%
inconsistency for both kinds of
witnesses.<00:30:26.080><c> In</c><00:30:26.200><c> another</c><00:30:26.440><c> study</c><00:30:26.680><c> in</c><00:30:26.760><c> 2019,</c>

00:30:27.830 --> 00:30:27.840 align:start position:0%
witnesses. In another study in 2019,
 

00:30:27.840 --> 00:30:29.990 align:start position:0%
witnesses. In another study in 2019,
similarly<00:30:28.480><c> showed</c><00:30:28.880><c> that</c><00:30:29.400><c> untruthful</c>

00:30:29.990 --> 00:30:30.000 align:start position:0%
similarly showed that untruthful
 

00:30:30.000 --> 00:30:32.630 align:start position:0%
similarly showed that untruthful
witnesses<00:30:30.400><c> were</c><00:30:30.520><c> slightly</c><00:30:30.960><c> better</c><00:30:32.360><c> than</c>

00:30:32.630 --> 00:30:32.640 align:start position:0%
witnesses were slightly better than
 

00:30:32.640 --> 00:30:34.870 align:start position:0%
witnesses were slightly better than
truthful<00:30:33.080><c> witnesses</c><00:30:34.240><c> at</c><00:30:34.440><c> noticing</c>

00:30:34.870 --> 00:30:34.880 align:start position:0%
truthful witnesses at noticing
 

00:30:34.880 --> 00:30:36.590 align:start position:0%
truthful witnesses at noticing
alterations<00:30:35.480><c> to</c><00:30:35.560><c> their</c><00:30:35.720><c> prior</c><00:30:36.000><c> statements.</c>

00:30:36.590 --> 00:30:36.600 align:start position:0%
alterations to their prior statements.
 

00:30:36.600 --> 00:30:38.230 align:start position:0%
alterations to their prior statements.
Guilty<00:30:36.880><c> suspects</c><00:30:37.240><c> are</c><00:30:37.320><c> not</c><00:30:37.600><c> easier</c><00:30:37.920><c> to</c>

00:30:38.230 --> 00:30:38.240 align:start position:0%
Guilty suspects are not easier to
 

00:30:38.240 --> 00:30:40.910 align:start position:0%
Guilty suspects are not easier to
mislead<00:30:38.880><c> than</c><00:30:39.040><c> innocent</c><00:30:39.440><c> ones.</c><00:30:39.800><c> Period.</c>

00:30:40.910 --> 00:30:40.920 align:start position:0%
mislead than innocent ones. Period.
 

00:30:40.920 --> 00:30:44.470 align:start position:0%
mislead than innocent ones. Period.
Highlight<00:30:41.880><c> underlined</c><00:30:42.880><c> text</c><00:30:43.240><c> on</c><00:30:43.360><c> the</c><00:30:43.480><c> screen,</c>

00:30:44.470 --> 00:30:44.480 align:start position:0%
Highlight underlined text on the screen,
 

00:30:44.480 --> 00:30:48.270 align:start position:0%
Highlight underlined text on the screen,
bold<00:30:45.000><c> it,</c><00:30:45.360><c> tattoo</c><00:30:46.120><c> it,</c><00:30:46.480><c> motif</c><00:30:47.240><c> it,</c><00:30:47.560><c> crochet</c>

00:30:48.270 --> 00:30:48.280 align:start position:0%
bold it, tattoo it, motif it, crochet
 

00:30:48.280 --> 00:30:50.910 align:start position:0%
bold it, tattoo it, motif it, crochet
it,<00:30:48.520><c> cross</c><00:30:48.920><c> stitch</c><00:30:49.400><c> it.</c><00:30:49.680><c> Guilty</c><00:30:50.000><c> suspects</c><00:30:50.760><c> are</c>

00:30:50.910 --> 00:30:50.920 align:start position:0%
it, cross stitch it. Guilty suspects are
 

00:30:50.920 --> 00:30:52.590 align:start position:0%
it, cross stitch it. Guilty suspects are
not<00:30:51.320><c> easier</c><00:30:51.600><c> to</c><00:30:51.760><c> mislead</c><00:30:52.160><c> than</c><00:30:52.280><c> innocent</c>

00:30:52.590 --> 00:30:52.600 align:start position:0%
not easier to mislead than innocent
 

00:30:52.600 --> 00:30:55.470 align:start position:0%
not easier to mislead than innocent
ones,<00:30:53.160><c> which</c><00:30:53.760><c> no</c><00:30:54.160><c> prosecutor</c><00:30:54.960><c> or</c><00:30:55.160><c> police</c>

00:30:55.470 --> 00:30:55.480 align:start position:0%
ones, which no prosecutor or police
 

00:30:55.480 --> 00:30:57.230 align:start position:0%
ones, which no prosecutor or police
officer<00:30:55.840><c> would</c><00:30:56.040><c> agree</c><00:30:56.320><c> with</c><00:30:56.600><c> you</c><00:30:56.800><c> on,</c><00:30:57.080><c> but</c>

00:30:57.230 --> 00:30:57.240 align:start position:0%
officer would agree with you on, but
 

00:30:57.240 --> 00:30:59.750 align:start position:0%
officer would agree with you on, but
it's<00:30:57.440><c> not</c><00:30:58.320><c> an</c><00:30:58.480><c> opinion.</c><00:30:59.160><c> This</c><00:30:59.320><c> is</c><00:30:59.440><c> based</c><00:30:59.640><c> on</c>

00:30:59.750 --> 00:30:59.760 align:start position:0%
it's not an opinion. This is based on
 

00:30:59.760 --> 00:31:02.030 align:start position:0%
it's not an opinion. This is based on
empirical<00:31:00.240><c> evidence,</c><00:31:00.640><c> babes.</c>

00:31:02.030 --> 00:31:02.040 align:start position:0%
empirical evidence, babes.
 

00:31:02.040 --> 00:31:04.350 align:start position:0%
empirical evidence, babes.
And<00:31:02.200><c> this</c><00:31:02.440><c> is</c><00:31:02.600><c> not</c><00:31:03.120><c> recent</c><00:31:03.600><c> news.</c><00:31:03.960><c> This</c><00:31:04.120><c> isn't</c>

00:31:04.350 --> 00:31:04.360 align:start position:0%
And this is not recent news. This isn't
 

00:31:04.360 --> 00:31:08.270 align:start position:0%
And this is not recent news. This isn't
even,<00:31:04.640><c> oh,</c><00:31:04.760><c> 2016,</c><00:31:05.440><c> 2019</c><00:31:06.560><c> news.</c><00:31:07.040><c> In</c><00:31:07.160><c> 1971,</c><00:31:08.120><c> an</c>

00:31:08.270 --> 00:31:08.280 align:start position:0%
even, oh, 2016, 2019 news. In 1971, an
 

00:31:08.280 --> 00:31:10.190 align:start position:0%
even, oh, 2016, 2019 news. In 1971, an
esteemed<00:31:08.800><c> law</c><00:31:08.960><c> review</c><00:31:09.200><c> article</c><00:31:09.560><c> titled</c>

00:31:10.190 --> 00:31:10.200 align:start position:0%
esteemed law review article titled
 

00:31:10.200 --> 00:31:12.710 align:start position:0%
esteemed law review article titled
Presentation<00:31:10.840><c> of</c><00:31:10.960><c> the</c><00:31:11.040><c> Defense</c><00:31:11.920><c> warned</c><00:31:12.520><c> that,</c>

00:31:12.710 --> 00:31:12.720 align:start position:0%
Presentation of the Defense warned that,
 

00:31:12.720 --> 00:31:14.510 align:start position:0%
Presentation of the Defense warned that,
quote,<00:31:13.200><c> the</c><00:31:13.320><c> subtle</c><00:31:13.600><c> pressures</c><00:31:14.160><c> that</c><00:31:14.320><c> the</c>

00:31:14.510 --> 00:31:14.520 align:start position:0%
quote, the subtle pressures that the
 

00:31:14.520 --> 00:31:15.870 align:start position:0%
quote, the subtle pressures that the
subsequent<00:31:14.960><c> interview</c><00:31:15.320><c> by</c><00:31:15.440><c> the</c><00:31:15.520><c> police</c><00:31:15.760><c> or</c>

00:31:15.870 --> 00:31:15.880 align:start position:0%
subsequent interview by the police or
 

00:31:15.880 --> 00:31:17.550 align:start position:0%
subsequent interview by the police or
prosecutor<00:31:16.480><c> may</c><00:31:16.760><c> bring</c><00:31:17.000><c> to</c><00:31:17.120><c> bear</c><00:31:17.400><c> on</c><00:31:17.480><c> the</c>

00:31:17.550 --> 00:31:17.560 align:start position:0%
prosecutor may bring to bear on the
 

00:31:17.560 --> 00:31:19.950 align:start position:0%
prosecutor may bring to bear on the
witness<00:31:17.960><c> may</c><00:31:18.080><c> disturb</c><00:31:18.800><c> the</c><00:31:18.920><c> certainty</c><00:31:19.640><c> of</c><00:31:19.840><c> the</c>

00:31:19.950 --> 00:31:19.960 align:start position:0%
witness may disturb the certainty of the
 

00:31:19.960 --> 00:31:21.550 align:start position:0%
witness may disturb the certainty of the
witness's<00:31:20.360><c> recollections</c><00:31:20.920><c> and</c><00:31:21.040><c> engendered</c>

00:31:21.550 --> 00:31:21.560 align:start position:0%
witness's recollections and engendered
 

00:31:21.560 --> 00:31:24.270 align:start position:0%
witness's recollections and engendered
changed<00:31:22.080><c> testimony</c><00:31:22.560><c> at</c><00:31:22.720><c> trial.</c>

00:31:24.270 --> 00:31:24.280 align:start position:0%
changed testimony at trial.
 

00:31:24.280 --> 00:31:27.230 align:start position:0%
changed testimony at trial.
We've<00:31:24.560><c> been</c><00:31:24.760><c> knew,</c><00:31:25.240><c> baby,</c><00:31:25.840><c> okay?</c><00:31:26.520><c> For</c><00:31:26.760><c> quite</c><00:31:27.160><c> a</c>

00:31:27.230 --> 00:31:27.240 align:start position:0%
We've been knew, baby, okay? For quite a
 

00:31:27.240 --> 00:31:30.190 align:start position:0%
We've been knew, baby, okay? For quite a
long<00:31:27.560><c> time.</c><00:31:28.240><c> And</c><00:31:29.200><c> unfortunately,</c><00:31:30.000><c> that</c>

00:31:30.190 --> 00:31:30.200 align:start position:0%
long time. And unfortunately, that
 

00:31:30.200 --> 00:31:32.470 align:start position:0%
long time. And unfortunately, that
knowledge,<00:31:30.680><c> that</c><00:31:30.920><c> research,</c><00:31:31.920><c> the</c><00:31:32.080><c> empirical</c>

00:31:32.470 --> 00:31:32.480 align:start position:0%
knowledge, that research, the empirical
 

00:31:32.480 --> 00:31:34.390 align:start position:0%
knowledge, that research, the empirical
information,<00:31:33.080><c> the</c><00:31:33.160><c> studies,</c><00:31:33.520><c> the</c><00:31:33.640><c> surveys,</c>

00:31:34.390 --> 00:31:34.400 align:start position:0%
information, the studies, the surveys,
 

00:31:34.400 --> 00:31:37.510 align:start position:0%
information, the studies, the surveys,
perceptions,<00:31:35.520><c> and</c><00:31:35.680><c> cognitive</c><00:31:36.240><c> psych,</c><00:31:36.840><c> and</c>

00:31:37.510 --> 00:31:37.520 align:start position:0%
perceptions, and cognitive psych, and
 

00:31:37.520 --> 00:31:39.430 align:start position:0%
perceptions, and cognitive psych, and
sociology,<00:31:38.360><c> even</c><00:31:38.640><c> socialization,</c>

00:31:39.430 --> 00:31:39.440 align:start position:0%
sociology, even socialization,
 

00:31:39.440 --> 00:31:41.310 align:start position:0%
sociology, even socialization,
interpersonal<00:31:40.000><c> communication,</c><00:31:40.720><c> from</c><00:31:41.000><c> every</c>

00:31:41.310 --> 00:31:41.320 align:start position:0%
interpersonal communication, from every
 

00:31:41.320 --> 00:31:43.110 align:start position:0%
interpersonal communication, from every
single<00:31:41.560><c> area.</c><00:31:42.280><c> They</c><00:31:42.440><c> are</c><00:31:42.600><c> conducting</c><00:31:42.960><c> these</c>

00:31:43.110 --> 00:31:43.120 align:start position:0%
single area. They are conducting these
 

00:31:43.120 --> 00:31:45.510 align:start position:0%
single area. They are conducting these
studies<00:31:43.560><c> and</c><00:31:44.080><c> and</c><00:31:44.360><c> handing</c><00:31:44.600><c> it</c><00:31:44.720><c> over</c><00:31:45.000><c> to</c><00:31:45.400><c> the</c>

00:31:45.510 --> 00:31:45.520 align:start position:0%
studies and and handing it over to the
 

00:31:45.520 --> 00:31:47.190 align:start position:0%
studies and and handing it over to the
legal<00:31:45.720><c> field</c><00:31:45.880><c> and</c><00:31:45.960><c> going,</c><00:31:46.160><c> is</c><00:31:46.240><c> this</c><00:31:46.400><c> helpful?</c>

00:31:47.190 --> 00:31:47.200 align:start position:0%
legal field and going, is this helpful?
 

00:31:47.200 --> 00:31:48.510 align:start position:0%
legal field and going, is this helpful?
And<00:31:47.360><c> if</c><00:31:47.440><c> that's</c><00:31:47.600><c> true,</c><00:31:47.720><c> you</c><00:31:47.760><c> say</c><00:31:47.920><c> yes,</c><00:31:48.240><c> and</c><00:31:48.440><c> the</c>

00:31:48.510 --> 00:31:48.520 align:start position:0%
And if that's true, you say yes, and the
 

00:31:48.520 --> 00:31:50.630 align:start position:0%
And if that's true, you say yes, and the
police<00:31:48.960><c> and</c><00:31:49.080><c> prosecutors</c><00:31:49.480><c> are</c><00:31:49.600><c> not</c><00:31:50.160><c> also</c><00:31:50.520><c> on</c>

00:31:50.630 --> 00:31:50.640 align:start position:0%
police and prosecutors are not also on
 

00:31:50.640 --> 00:31:53.270 align:start position:0%
police and prosecutors are not also on
the<00:31:50.760><c> hook</c><00:31:51.120><c> to</c><00:31:51.800><c> be</c><00:31:52.000><c> forced</c><00:31:52.440><c> to</c><00:31:52.600><c> incorporate</c>

00:31:53.270 --> 00:31:53.280 align:start position:0%
the hook to be forced to incorporate
 

00:31:53.280 --> 00:31:54.390 align:start position:0%
the hook to be forced to incorporate
these

00:31:54.390 --> 00:31:54.400 align:start position:0%
these
 

00:31:54.400 --> 00:31:55.950 align:start position:0%
these
these<00:31:54.640><c> realities</c><00:31:55.240><c> into</c><00:31:55.440><c> their</c><00:31:55.600><c> work.</c><00:31:55.840><c> They</c>

00:31:55.950 --> 00:31:55.960 align:start position:0%
these realities into their work. They
 

00:31:55.960 --> 00:31:59.910 align:start position:0%
these realities into their work. They
continue<00:31:56.640><c> to</c><00:31:57.480><c> make</c><00:31:57.760><c> the</c><00:31:57.880><c> same</c><00:31:59.080><c> quick,</c>

00:31:59.910 --> 00:31:59.920 align:start position:0%
continue to make the same quick,
 

00:31:59.920 --> 00:32:02.790 align:start position:0%
continue to make the same quick,
premature<00:32:00.920><c> judgments</c><00:32:02.080><c> against</c><00:32:02.400><c> defendants.</c>

00:32:02.790 --> 00:32:02.800 align:start position:0%
premature judgments against defendants.
 

00:32:02.800 --> 00:32:06.550 align:start position:0%
premature judgments against defendants.
And<00:32:03.040><c> and</c><00:32:03.440><c> it</c><00:32:03.600><c> leads</c><00:32:03.920><c> to</c><00:32:04.680><c> premature</c><00:32:05.800><c> narrowing</c>

00:32:06.550 --> 00:32:06.560 align:start position:0%
And and it leads to premature narrowing
 

00:32:06.560 --> 00:32:09.990 align:start position:0%
And and it leads to premature narrowing
of<00:32:06.720><c> a</c><00:32:06.760><c> suspect</c><00:32:07.240><c> list,</c><00:32:08.040><c> of</c><00:32:08.760><c> of</c><00:32:09.280><c> committing</c><00:32:09.720><c> so</c>

00:32:09.990 --> 00:32:10.000 align:start position:0%
of a suspect list, of of committing so
 

00:32:10.000 --> 00:32:12.550 align:start position:0%
of a suspect list, of of committing so
much<00:32:10.400><c> of</c><00:32:11.120><c> a</c><00:32:11.320><c> case's</c><00:32:11.760><c> resources,</c>

00:32:12.550 --> 00:32:12.560 align:start position:0%
much of a case's resources,
 

00:32:12.560 --> 00:32:15.310 align:start position:0%
much of a case's resources,
investigations<00:32:13.120><c> resources</c><00:32:14.000><c> to</c><00:32:14.440><c> proving</c><00:32:15.080><c> one</c>

00:32:15.310 --> 00:32:15.320 align:start position:0%
investigations resources to proving one
 

00:32:15.320 --> 00:32:18.350 align:start position:0%
investigations resources to proving one
person<00:32:16.280><c> guilty,</c><00:32:17.040><c> getting</c><00:32:17.280><c> a</c><00:32:17.320><c> conviction,</c><00:32:18.160><c> as</c>

00:32:18.350 --> 00:32:18.360 align:start position:0%
person guilty, getting a conviction, as
 

00:32:18.360 --> 00:32:20.950 align:start position:0%
person guilty, getting a conviction, as
opposed<00:32:18.920><c> to</c><00:32:19.960><c> investigating</c><00:32:20.600><c> the</c><00:32:20.720><c> actual</c>

00:32:20.950 --> 00:32:20.960 align:start position:0%
opposed to investigating the actual
 

00:32:20.960 --> 00:32:23.270 align:start position:0%
opposed to investigating the actual
crime,<00:32:21.240><c> and</c><00:32:21.440><c> actually</c><00:32:22.240><c> seeking</c><00:32:22.720><c> the</c><00:32:22.840><c> justice,</c>

00:32:23.270 --> 00:32:23.280 align:start position:0%
crime, and actually seeking the justice,
 

00:32:23.280 --> 00:32:25.390 align:start position:0%
crime, and actually seeking the justice,
and<00:32:23.400><c> achieving</c><00:32:23.880><c> the</c><00:32:23.960><c> justice</c><00:32:24.960><c> that</c><00:32:25.200><c> the</c>

00:32:25.390 --> 00:32:25.400 align:start position:0%
and achieving the justice that the
 

00:32:25.400 --> 00:32:27.430 align:start position:0%
and achieving the justice that the
victim<00:32:25.880><c> deserves,</c><00:32:26.520><c> or</c><00:32:26.640><c> that</c><00:32:26.920><c> the</c><00:32:27.000><c> public</c><00:32:27.320><c> and</c>

00:32:27.430 --> 00:32:27.440 align:start position:0%
victim deserves, or that the public and
 

00:32:27.440 --> 00:32:29.870 align:start position:0%
victim deserves, or that the public and
society<00:32:28.040><c> need</c><00:32:28.360><c> and</c><00:32:28.680><c> and</c><00:32:28.880><c> wants.</c><00:32:29.560><c> One</c>

00:32:29.870 --> 00:32:29.880 align:start position:0%
society need and and wants. One
 

00:32:29.880 --> 00:32:32.390 align:start position:0%
society need and and wants. One
prosecutor's<00:32:30.480><c> remark</c><00:32:30.880><c> to</c><00:32:31.000><c> the</c><00:32:31.120><c> press</c><00:32:32.000><c> in</c>

00:32:32.390 --> 00:32:32.400 align:start position:0%
prosecutor's remark to the press in
 

00:32:32.400 --> 00:32:35.430 align:start position:0%
prosecutor's remark to the press in
2013,<00:32:33.760><c> quote,</c><00:32:34.440><c> "Unless</c><00:32:34.760><c> I</c><00:32:34.840><c> could</c><00:32:35.000><c> break</c><00:32:35.240><c> this</c>

00:32:35.430 --> 00:32:35.440 align:start position:0%
2013, quote, "Unless I could break this
 

00:32:35.440 --> 00:32:37.550 align:start position:0%
2013, quote, "Unless I could break this
guy's<00:32:35.680><c> alibi,</c><00:32:36.280><c> a</c><00:32:36.400><c> murderer</c><00:32:36.880><c> might</c><00:32:37.040><c> be</c><00:32:37.160><c> walking</c>

00:32:37.550 --> 00:32:37.560 align:start position:0%
guy's alibi, a murderer might be walking
 

00:32:37.560 --> 00:32:39.430 align:start position:0%
guy's alibi, a murderer might be walking
on<00:32:37.680><c> the</c><00:32:37.760><c> street.</c><00:32:38.440><c> There</c><00:32:38.600><c> was</c><00:32:38.800><c> such</c><00:32:39.040><c> a</c><00:32:39.120><c> small</c>

00:32:39.430 --> 00:32:39.440 align:start position:0%
on the street. There was such a small
 

00:32:39.440 --> 00:32:42.150 align:start position:0%
on the street. There was such a small
window<00:32:39.720><c> of</c><00:32:39.880><c> opportunity,</c><00:32:41.160><c> I</c><00:32:41.280><c> had</c><00:32:41.600><c> to</c><00:32:41.760><c> act</c>

00:32:42.150 --> 00:32:42.160 align:start position:0%
window of opportunity, I had to act
 

00:32:42.160 --> 00:32:45.310 align:start position:0%
window of opportunity, I had to act
fast.<00:32:43.040><c> Sometimes,</c><00:32:44.000><c> alibi</c><00:32:44.320><c> witnesses</c><00:32:44.840><c> do</c><00:32:45.040><c> not</c>

00:32:45.310 --> 00:32:45.320 align:start position:0%
fast. Sometimes, alibi witnesses do not
 

00:32:45.320 --> 00:32:46.750 align:start position:0%
fast. Sometimes, alibi witnesses do not
go<00:32:45.440><c> to</c><00:32:45.520><c> the</c><00:32:45.600><c> police</c><00:32:46.040><c> and</c><00:32:46.160><c> instead</c><00:32:46.480><c> go</c><00:32:46.600><c> to</c><00:32:46.680><c> the</c>

00:32:46.750 --> 00:32:46.760 align:start position:0%
go to the police and instead go to the
 

00:32:46.760 --> 00:32:49.230 align:start position:0%
go to the police and instead go to the
defendant's<00:32:47.160><c> family</c><00:32:47.960><c> or</c><00:32:48.160><c> defense</c><00:32:48.560><c> counsel.</c>

00:32:49.230 --> 00:32:49.240 align:start position:0%
defendant's family or defense counsel.
 

00:32:49.240 --> 00:32:51.190 align:start position:0%
defendant's family or defense counsel.
In<00:32:49.440><c> State</c><00:32:49.720><c> versus</c><00:32:50.040><c> Gear,</c><00:32:50.680><c> the</c><00:32:50.760><c> Connecticut</c>

00:32:51.190 --> 00:32:51.200 align:start position:0%
In State versus Gear, the Connecticut
 

00:32:51.200 --> 00:32:52.670 align:start position:0%
In State versus Gear, the Connecticut
Supreme<00:32:51.520><c> Court</c><00:32:51.800><c> stated</c><00:32:52.120><c> that,</c><00:32:52.280><c> quote,</c>

00:32:52.670 --> 00:32:52.680 align:start position:0%
Supreme Court stated that, quote,
 

00:32:52.680 --> 00:32:53.830 align:start position:0%
Supreme Court stated that, quote,
"Although<00:32:52.920><c> we</c><00:32:53.040><c> do</c><00:32:53.120><c> not</c><00:32:53.280><c> believe</c><00:32:53.600><c> that</c><00:32:53.720><c> an</c>

00:32:53.830 --> 00:32:53.840 align:start position:0%
"Although we do not believe that an
 

00:32:53.840 --> 00:32:55.870 align:start position:0%
"Although we do not believe that an
alibi<00:32:54.160><c> witness</c><00:32:54.440><c> has</c><00:32:54.600><c> a</c><00:32:54.680><c> duty</c><00:32:55.120><c> to</c><00:32:55.280><c> report</c><00:32:55.720><c> an</c>

00:32:55.870 --> 00:32:55.880 align:start position:0%
alibi witness has a duty to report an
 

00:32:55.880 --> 00:32:58.030 align:start position:0%
alibi witness has a duty to report an
alibi<00:32:56.240><c> story</c><00:32:56.920><c> to</c><00:32:57.040><c> the</c><00:32:57.120><c> police</c><00:32:57.520><c> or</c><00:32:57.680><c> for</c><00:32:57.840><c> that</c>

00:32:58.030 --> 00:32:58.040 align:start position:0%
alibi story to the police or for that
 

00:32:58.040 --> 00:33:00.510 align:start position:0%
alibi story to the police or for that
matter<00:32:58.640><c> to</c><00:32:58.920><c> any</c><00:32:59.200><c> other</c><00:32:59.440><c> person,</c><00:33:00.040><c> a</c><00:33:00.160><c> witness</c><00:33:00.400><c> in</c>

00:33:00.510 --> 00:33:00.520 align:start position:0%
matter to any other person, a witness in
 

00:33:00.520 --> 00:33:02.470 align:start position:0%
matter to any other person, a witness in
many<00:33:00.720><c> instances</c><00:33:01.200><c> naturally</c><00:33:01.640><c> may</c><00:33:01.800><c> be</c><00:33:01.920><c> expected</c>

00:33:02.470 --> 00:33:02.480 align:start position:0%
many instances naturally may be expected
 

00:33:02.480 --> 00:33:04.390 align:start position:0%
many instances naturally may be expected
to<00:33:02.560><c> convey</c><00:33:03.200><c> such</c><00:33:03.480><c> information,</c><00:33:04.040><c> especially</c>

00:33:04.390 --> 00:33:04.400 align:start position:0%
to convey such information, especially
 

00:33:04.400 --> 00:33:05.710 align:start position:0%
to convey such information, especially
when<00:33:04.520><c> the</c><00:33:04.600><c> witness</c><00:33:04.880><c> is</c><00:33:05.080><c> friendly</c><00:33:05.440><c> with</c><00:33:05.600><c> the</c>

00:33:05.710 --> 00:33:05.720 align:start position:0%
when the witness is friendly with the
 

00:33:05.720 --> 00:33:08.830 align:start position:0%
when the witness is friendly with the
accused.<00:33:06.800><c> Failure</c><00:33:07.400><c> of</c><00:33:07.520><c> the</c><00:33:07.640><c> witness</c><00:33:08.120><c> to</c><00:33:08.240><c> do</c><00:33:08.440><c> so</c>

00:33:08.830 --> 00:33:08.840 align:start position:0%
accused. Failure of the witness to do so
 

00:33:08.840 --> 00:33:10.270 align:start position:0%
accused. Failure of the witness to do so
would<00:33:09.160><c> under</c><00:33:09.400><c> those</c><00:33:09.640><c> circumstances</c>

00:33:10.270 --> 00:33:10.280 align:start position:0%
would under those circumstances
 

00:33:10.280 --> 00:33:12.070 align:start position:0%
would under those circumstances
constitute<00:33:10.720><c> grounds</c><00:33:11.000><c> for</c><00:33:11.120><c> impeachment</c>

00:33:12.070 --> 00:33:12.080 align:start position:0%
constitute grounds for impeachment
 

00:33:12.080 --> 00:33:13.950 align:start position:0%
constitute grounds for impeachment
because<00:33:12.360><c> the</c><00:33:12.480><c> failure</c><00:33:12.880><c> to</c><00:33:13.000><c> report</c><00:33:13.320><c> an</c><00:33:13.440><c> alibi</c>

00:33:13.950 --> 00:33:13.960 align:start position:0%
because the failure to report an alibi
 

00:33:13.960 --> 00:33:16.150 align:start position:0%
because the failure to report an alibi
under<00:33:14.200><c> such</c><00:33:14.400><c> circumstances</c><00:33:15.000><c> is</c><00:33:15.200><c> relevant</c><00:33:16.040><c> to</c>

00:33:16.150 --> 00:33:16.160 align:start position:0%
under such circumstances is relevant to
 

00:33:16.160 --> 00:33:17.870 align:start position:0%
under such circumstances is relevant to
the<00:33:16.320><c> issue</c><00:33:16.560><c> of</c><00:33:16.680><c> credibility</c><00:33:17.480><c> or</c><00:33:17.680><c> more</c>

00:33:17.870 --> 00:33:17.880 align:start position:0%
the issue of credibility or more
 

00:33:17.880 --> 00:33:20.350 align:start position:0%
the issue of credibility or more
specifically<00:33:18.920><c> the</c><00:33:19.040><c> issue</c><00:33:19.320><c> of</c><00:33:19.400><c> fabrication."</c>

00:33:20.350 --> 00:33:20.360 align:start position:0%
specifically the issue of fabrication."
 

00:33:20.360 --> 00:33:23.110 align:start position:0%
specifically the issue of fabrication."
A<00:33:20.440><c> review</c><00:33:21.080><c> of</c><00:33:21.360><c> the</c><00:33:21.520><c> briefs</c><00:33:22.000><c> in</c><00:33:22.200><c> the</c><00:33:22.600><c> case</c><00:33:22.960><c> that</c>

00:33:23.110 --> 00:33:23.120 align:start position:0%
A review of the briefs in the case that
 

00:33:23.120 --> 00:33:24.710 align:start position:0%
A review of the briefs in the case that
I<00:33:23.200><c> just</c><00:33:23.400><c> quoted</c><00:33:23.680><c> from,</c><00:33:23.880><c> State</c><00:33:24.080><c> versus</c><00:33:24.360><c> Gear,</c>

00:33:24.710 --> 00:33:24.720 align:start position:0%
I just quoted from, State versus Gear,
 

00:33:24.720 --> 00:33:26.470 align:start position:0%
I just quoted from, State versus Gear,
it<00:33:24.880><c> shows</c><00:33:25.200><c> that</c><00:33:25.320><c> this</c><00:33:25.480><c> assertion</c><00:33:26.200><c> by</c><00:33:26.360><c> the</c>

00:33:26.470 --> 00:33:26.480 align:start position:0%
it shows that this assertion by the
 

00:33:26.480 --> 00:33:29.070 align:start position:0%
it shows that this assertion by the
court<00:33:26.880><c> is</c><00:33:27.040><c> based</c><00:33:27.480><c> entirely</c><00:33:28.480><c> on</c><00:33:28.640><c> judicial</c>

00:33:29.070 --> 00:33:29.080 align:start position:0%
court is based entirely on judicial
 

00:33:29.080 --> 00:33:31.390 align:start position:0%
court is based entirely on judicial
experience.<00:33:30.320><c> Neither</c><00:33:30.720><c> party</c><00:33:31.000><c> provided</c><00:33:31.320><c> the</c>

00:33:31.390 --> 00:33:31.400 align:start position:0%
experience. Neither party provided the
 

00:33:31.400 --> 00:33:33.790 align:start position:0%
experience. Neither party provided the
court<00:33:31.640><c> with</c><00:33:31.880><c> research</c><00:33:32.440><c> on</c><00:33:32.800><c> into</c><00:33:33.240><c> how</c><00:33:33.480><c> alibi</c>

00:33:33.790 --> 00:33:33.800 align:start position:0%
court with research on into how alibi
 

00:33:33.800 --> 00:33:35.830 align:start position:0%
court with research on into how alibi
witnesses<00:33:34.280><c> behave.</c><00:33:35.360><c> That</c><00:33:35.480><c> case</c><00:33:35.640><c> was</c><00:33:35.720><c> from</c>

00:33:35.830 --> 00:33:35.840 align:start position:0%
witnesses behave. That case was from
 

00:33:35.840 --> 00:33:38.470 align:start position:0%
witnesses behave. That case was from
1986,<00:33:37.000><c> by</c><00:33:37.120><c> the</c><00:33:37.200><c> way.</c><00:33:37.720><c> The</c><00:33:37.840><c> Gear</c><00:33:38.040><c> opinion</c><00:33:38.360><c> is</c>

00:33:38.470 --> 00:33:38.480 align:start position:0%
1986, by the way. The Gear opinion is
 

00:33:38.480 --> 00:33:39.950 align:start position:0%
1986, by the way. The Gear opinion is
akin<00:33:38.680><c> to</c><00:33:38.760><c> the</c><00:33:38.880><c> historical</c><00:33:39.280><c> belief</c><00:33:39.600><c> discussed</c>

00:33:39.950 --> 00:33:39.960 align:start position:0%
akin to the historical belief discussed
 

00:33:39.960 --> 00:33:41.990 align:start position:0%
akin to the historical belief discussed
a<00:33:40.040><c> decade</c><00:33:40.400><c> later</c><00:33:40.680><c> in</c><00:33:40.800><c> State</c><00:33:41.040><c> versus</c><00:33:41.360><c> Troop</c>

00:33:41.990 --> 00:33:42.000 align:start position:0%
a decade later in State versus Troop
 

00:33:42.000 --> 00:33:44.910 align:start position:0%
a decade later in State versus Troop
that,<00:33:42.360><c> quote,</c><00:33:42.760><c> "Any</c><00:33:43.040><c> normal</c><00:33:43.560><c> woman,</c><00:33:44.560><c> oh,</c><00:33:44.760><c> I'm</c>

00:33:44.910 --> 00:33:44.920 align:start position:0%
that, quote, "Any normal woman, oh, I'm
 

00:33:44.920 --> 00:33:48.510 align:start position:0%
that, quote, "Any normal woman, oh, I'm
so<00:33:45.120><c> pissed.</c><00:33:46.000><c> Any</c><00:33:46.240><c> normal</c><00:33:46.600><c> woman,</c><00:33:47.280><c> quote,</c><00:33:48.240><c> any</c>

00:33:48.510 --> 00:33:48.520 align:start position:0%
so pissed. Any normal woman, quote, any
 

00:33:48.520 --> 00:33:51.430 align:start position:0%
so pissed. Any normal woman, quote, any
normal<00:33:48.880><c> woman</c><00:33:49.400><c> would</c><00:33:49.680><c> report</c><00:33:50.200><c> a</c><00:33:50.320><c> rape</c><00:33:51.040><c> soon</c>

00:33:51.430 --> 00:33:51.440 align:start position:0%
normal woman would report a rape soon
 

00:33:51.440 --> 00:33:53.790 align:start position:0%
normal woman would report a rape soon
after<00:33:51.720><c> its</c><00:33:51.920><c> occurrence."</c><00:33:53.120><c> The</c><00:33:53.360><c> clear</c>

00:33:53.790 --> 00:33:53.800 align:start position:0%
after its occurrence." The clear
 

00:33:53.800 --> 00:33:56.230 align:start position:0%
after its occurrence." The clear
implication<00:33:54.480><c> of</c><00:33:54.600><c> this</c><00:33:54.760><c> assumption</c><00:33:55.880><c> was</c><00:33:56.080><c> that</c>

00:33:56.230 --> 00:33:56.240 align:start position:0%
implication of this assumption was that
 

00:33:56.240 --> 00:33:58.670 align:start position:0%
implication of this assumption was that
if<00:33:56.360><c> the</c><00:33:56.520><c> woman</c><00:33:56.840><c> did</c><00:33:56.960><c> not</c><00:33:57.160><c> complain,</c><00:33:58.320><c> it</c><00:33:58.480><c> was</c>

00:33:58.670 --> 00:33:58.680 align:start position:0%
if the woman did not complain, it was
 

00:33:58.680 --> 00:34:01.950 align:start position:0%
if the woman did not complain, it was
likely<00:33:59.080><c> that</c><00:33:59.280><c> no</c><00:33:59.480><c> rape</c><00:33:59.760><c> had</c><00:33:59.880><c> occurred.</c><00:34:00.960><c> I,</c><00:34:01.720><c> as</c>

00:34:01.950 --> 00:34:01.960 align:start position:0%
likely that no rape had occurred. I, as
 

00:34:01.960 --> 00:34:04.150 align:start position:0%
likely that no rape had occurred. I, as
we<00:34:02.120><c> know</c><00:34:02.560><c> a</c><00:34:02.640><c> million</c><00:34:03.040><c> times</c><00:34:03.440><c> over,</c><00:34:03.600><c> that</c><00:34:03.760><c> is</c><00:34:03.920><c> so</c>

00:34:04.150 --> 00:34:04.160 align:start position:0%
we know a million times over, that is so
 

00:34:04.160 --> 00:34:06.710 align:start position:0%
we know a million times over, that is so
violently<00:34:04.680><c> incorrect.</c><00:34:05.720><c> It's</c><00:34:05.960><c> because</c><00:34:06.320><c> police</c>

00:34:06.710 --> 00:34:06.720 align:start position:0%
violently incorrect. It's because police
 

00:34:06.720 --> 00:34:09.270 align:start position:0%
violently incorrect. It's because police
so<00:34:06.960><c> often</c><00:34:07.400><c> do</c><00:34:07.640><c> not</c><00:34:08.280><c> adequately</c><00:34:08.720><c> investigate,</c>

00:34:09.270 --> 00:34:09.280 align:start position:0%
so often do not adequately investigate,
 

00:34:09.280 --> 00:34:11.470 align:start position:0%
so often do not adequately investigate,
they<00:34:09.399><c> disbelieve</c><00:34:10.159><c> women,</c><00:34:10.800><c> they</c><00:34:10.960><c> do</c><00:34:11.120><c> not</c><00:34:11.320><c> get</c>

00:34:11.470 --> 00:34:11.480 align:start position:0%
they disbelieve women, they do not get
 

00:34:11.480 --> 00:34:12.710 align:start position:0%
they disbelieve women, they do not get
justice<00:34:11.800><c> for</c><00:34:11.879><c> these</c><00:34:12.000><c> victims</c><00:34:12.280><c> and</c><00:34:12.360><c> it</c><00:34:12.560><c> and</c>

00:34:12.710 --> 00:34:12.720 align:start position:0%
justice for these victims and it and
 

00:34:12.720 --> 00:34:14.750 align:start position:0%
justice for these victims and it and
it's<00:34:13.040><c> so</c><00:34:13.800><c> It</c><00:34:13.919><c> is</c><00:34:14.000><c> so</c><00:34:14.080><c> much</c><00:34:14.240><c> more</c><00:34:14.360><c> likely</c><00:34:14.600><c> that</c>

00:34:14.750 --> 00:34:14.760 align:start position:0%
it's so It is so much more likely that
 

00:34:14.760 --> 00:34:18.070 align:start position:0%
it's so It is so much more likely that
they<00:34:14.960><c> will</c><00:34:15.320><c> be</c><00:34:15.919><c> even</c><00:34:16.840><c> more</c>

00:34:18.070 --> 00:34:18.080 align:start position:0%
they will be even more
 

00:34:18.080 --> 00:34:20.470 align:start position:0%
they will be even more
traumatized,<00:34:18.960><c> revictimized</c><00:34:19.760><c> by</c><00:34:20.159><c> even</c><00:34:20.399><c> the</c>

00:34:20.470 --> 00:34:20.480 align:start position:0%
traumatized, revictimized by even the
 

00:34:20.480 --> 00:34:22.149 align:start position:0%
traumatized, revictimized by even the
process<00:34:20.840><c> of</c><00:34:20.960><c> investigation</c><00:34:21.560><c> that</c><00:34:21.679><c> could</c>

00:34:22.149 --> 00:34:22.159 align:start position:0%
process of investigation that could
 

00:34:22.159 --> 00:34:24.470 align:start position:0%
process of investigation that could
result<00:34:22.560><c> in</c><00:34:22.720><c> nothing</c><00:34:23.200><c> happening</c><00:34:24.159><c> to</c><00:34:24.360><c> the</c>

00:34:24.470 --> 00:34:24.480 align:start position:0%
result in nothing happening to the
 

00:34:24.480 --> 00:34:27.190 align:start position:0%
result in nothing happening to the
person<00:34:25.040><c> who</c><00:34:25.399><c> who</c><00:34:25.919><c> assaulted</c><00:34:26.360><c> them.</c>

00:34:27.190 --> 00:34:27.200 align:start position:0%
person who who assaulted them.
 

00:34:27.200 --> 00:34:29.110 align:start position:0%
person who who assaulted them.
Uh<00:34:27.280><c> that</c><00:34:27.520><c> that</c><00:34:27.720><c> they're</c><00:34:28.240><c> they</c>

00:34:29.110 --> 00:34:29.120 align:start position:0%
Uh that that they're they
 

00:34:29.120 --> 00:34:30.030 align:start position:0%
Uh that that they're they
All<00:34:29.280><c> they</c><00:34:29.399><c> want</c><00:34:29.520><c> to</c><00:34:29.560><c> do</c><00:34:29.639><c> is</c><00:34:29.720><c> put</c><00:34:29.840><c> it</c><00:34:29.879><c> behind</c>

00:34:30.030 --> 00:34:30.040 align:start position:0%
All they want to do is put it behind
 

00:34:30.040 --> 00:34:31.909 align:start position:0%
All they want to do is put it behind
them.<00:34:30.120><c> Like,</c><00:34:30.360><c> what?</c><00:34:30.919><c> I</c><00:34:31.000><c> could</c><00:34:31.240><c> sit</c><00:34:31.560><c> I</c><00:34:31.639><c> could</c><00:34:31.800><c> do</c>

00:34:31.909 --> 00:34:31.919 align:start position:0%
them. Like, what? I could sit I could do
 

00:34:31.919 --> 00:34:33.869 align:start position:0%
them. Like, what? I could sit I could do
a<00:34:32.080><c> whole</c><00:34:32.280><c> episode</c><00:34:32.560><c> of</c><00:34:32.679><c> just</c><00:34:32.879><c> about</c><00:34:33.040><c> that.</c><00:34:33.600><c> But</c>

00:34:33.869 --> 00:34:33.879 align:start position:0%
a whole episode of just about that. But
 

00:34:33.879 --> 00:34:35.830 align:start position:0%
a whole episode of just about that. But
um<00:34:34.520><c> I</c><00:34:34.760><c> hope</c><00:34:35.000><c> that</c><00:34:35.120><c> all</c><00:34:35.280><c> of</c><00:34:35.360><c> you</c><00:34:35.480><c> who</c><00:34:35.560><c> listen</c><00:34:35.760><c> to</c>

00:34:35.830 --> 00:34:35.840 align:start position:0%
um I hope that all of you who listen to
 

00:34:35.840 --> 00:34:37.430 align:start position:0%
um I hope that all of you who listen to
this<00:34:35.919><c> podcast</c><00:34:36.200><c> are</c><00:34:36.280><c> adult</c><00:34:36.600><c> enough</c><00:34:36.800><c> to</c><00:34:36.919><c> know</c>

00:34:37.430 --> 00:34:37.440 align:start position:0%
this podcast are adult enough to know
 

00:34:37.440 --> 00:34:39.590 align:start position:0%
this podcast are adult enough to know
how<00:34:37.600><c> batshit</c><00:34:38.399><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:34:38.800><c> crazy</c><00:34:39.159><c> it</c><00:34:39.280><c> is</c><00:34:39.480><c> that</c>

00:34:39.590 --> 00:34:39.600 align:start position:0%
how batshit [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] crazy it is that
 

00:34:39.600 --> 00:34:42.149 align:start position:0%
how batshit [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] crazy it is that
that<00:34:39.720><c> is</c><00:34:39.919><c> actually</c><00:34:41.080><c> a</c><00:34:41.159><c> sizable</c><00:34:41.600><c> sentence</c><00:34:41.960><c> in</c><00:34:42.120><c> a</c>

00:34:42.149 --> 00:34:42.159 align:start position:0%
that is actually a sizable sentence in a
 

00:34:42.159 --> 00:34:43.510 align:start position:0%
that is actually a sizable sentence in a
court<00:34:42.399><c> opinion.</c>

00:34:43.510 --> 00:34:43.520 align:start position:0%
court opinion.
 

00:34:43.520 --> 00:34:45.350 align:start position:0%
court opinion.
And<00:34:43.639><c> we</c><00:34:43.760><c> wonder</c><00:34:44.000><c> why</c><00:34:44.120><c> rape</c><00:34:44.320><c> culture</c><00:34:44.639><c> exists.</c>

00:34:45.350 --> 00:34:45.360 align:start position:0%
And we wonder why rape culture exists.
 

00:34:45.360 --> 00:34:47.310 align:start position:0%
And we wonder why rape culture exists.
The<00:34:45.480><c> troop</c><00:34:45.800><c> court</c><00:34:46.240><c> recognized</c><00:34:46.800><c> that</c><00:34:47.000><c> quote</c>

00:34:47.310 --> 00:34:47.320 align:start position:0%
The troop court recognized that quote
 

00:34:47.320 --> 00:34:48.669 align:start position:0%
The troop court recognized that quote
indisputably<00:34:48.040><c> one</c><00:34:48.159><c> of</c><00:34:48.240><c> the</c><00:34:48.320><c> historic</c>

00:34:48.669 --> 00:34:48.679 align:start position:0%
indisputably one of the historic
 

00:34:48.679 --> 00:34:49.990 align:start position:0%
indisputably one of the historic
premises<00:34:49.080><c> of</c><00:34:49.159><c> the</c><00:34:49.240><c> doctrine</c><00:34:49.600><c> that</c><00:34:49.720><c> it</c><00:34:49.840><c> is</c>

00:34:49.990 --> 00:34:50.000 align:start position:0%
premises of the doctrine that it is
 

00:34:50.000 --> 00:34:51.430 align:start position:0%
premises of the doctrine that it is
natural<00:34:50.600><c> for</c><00:34:50.679><c> the</c><00:34:50.760><c> victims</c><00:34:51.040><c> of</c><00:34:51.120><c> a</c><00:34:51.159><c> sexual</c>

00:34:51.430 --> 00:34:51.440 align:start position:0%
natural for the victims of a sexual
 

00:34:51.440 --> 00:34:54.030 align:start position:0%
natural for the victims of a sexual
assault<00:34:52.120><c> to</c><00:34:52.320><c> complain</c><00:34:53.040><c> promptly</c><00:34:53.720><c> following</c>

00:34:54.030 --> 00:34:54.040 align:start position:0%
assault to complain promptly following
 

00:34:54.040 --> 00:34:55.750 align:start position:0%
assault to complain promptly following
the<00:34:54.159><c> assault</c><00:34:54.639><c> has</c><00:34:54.840><c> been</c><00:34:55.040><c> discredited</c>

00:34:55.750 --> 00:34:55.760 align:start position:0%
the assault has been discredited
 

00:34:55.760 --> 00:34:57.710 align:start position:0%
the assault has been discredited
substantially<00:34:56.399><c> in</c><00:34:56.480><c> contemporary</c><00:34:57.040><c> times.</c><00:34:57.600><c> The</c>

00:34:57.710 --> 00:34:57.720 align:start position:0%
substantially in contemporary times. The
 

00:34:57.720 --> 00:34:59.470 align:start position:0%
substantially in contemporary times. The
overwhelming<00:34:58.160><c> body</c><00:34:58.440><c> of</c><00:34:58.560><c> empirical</c><00:34:59.040><c> studies</c>

00:34:59.470 --> 00:34:59.480 align:start position:0%
overwhelming body of empirical studies
 

00:34:59.480 --> 00:35:00.870 align:start position:0%
overwhelming body of empirical studies
data<00:34:59.760><c> and</c><00:34:59.960><c> other</c><00:35:00.160><c> information</c><00:35:00.520><c> establishes</c>

00:35:00.870 --> 00:35:00.880 align:start position:0%
data and other information establishes
 

00:35:00.880 --> 00:35:03.190 align:start position:0%
data and other information establishes
that<00:35:01.000><c> it</c><00:35:01.080><c> is</c><00:35:01.200><c> not</c><00:35:01.920><c> inherently</c><00:35:02.640><c> quote</c><00:35:02.880><c> unquote</c>

00:35:03.190 --> 00:35:03.200 align:start position:0%
that it is not inherently quote unquote
 

00:35:03.200 --> 00:35:05.430 align:start position:0%
that it is not inherently quote unquote
natural<00:35:04.160><c> for</c><00:35:04.320><c> the</c><00:35:04.480><c> victim</c><00:35:04.800><c> to</c><00:35:04.920><c> confide</c><00:35:05.320><c> in</c>

00:35:05.430 --> 00:35:05.440 align:start position:0%
natural for the victim to confide in
 

00:35:05.440 --> 00:35:07.030 align:start position:0%
natural for the victim to confide in
someone<00:35:05.800><c> or</c><00:35:05.920><c> to</c><00:35:06.040><c> disclose</c><00:35:06.560><c> immediately</c>

00:35:07.030 --> 00:35:07.040 align:start position:0%
someone or to disclose immediately
 

00:35:07.040 --> 00:35:08.590 align:start position:0%
someone or to disclose immediately
following<00:35:07.360><c> the</c><00:35:07.400><c> commission</c><00:35:07.720><c> of</c><00:35:07.800><c> the</c><00:35:07.880><c> offense</c>

00:35:08.590 --> 00:35:08.600 align:start position:0%
following the commission of the offense
 

00:35:08.600 --> 00:35:10.390 align:start position:0%
following the commission of the offense
that<00:35:08.760><c> he</c><00:35:08.880><c> or</c><00:35:08.960><c> she</c><00:35:09.120><c> was</c><00:35:09.240><c> sexually</c><00:35:09.560><c> assaulted.</c>

00:35:10.390 --> 00:35:10.400 align:start position:0%
that he or she was sexually assaulted.
 

00:35:10.400 --> 00:35:12.350 align:start position:0%
that he or she was sexually assaulted.
Thank<00:35:10.760><c> you.</c><00:35:11.160><c> Alibi</c><00:35:11.480><c> research</c><00:35:11.840><c> however</c><00:35:12.200><c> does</c>

00:35:12.350 --> 00:35:12.360 align:start position:0%
Thank you. Alibi research however does
 

00:35:12.360 --> 00:35:14.510 align:start position:0%
Thank you. Alibi research however does
not<00:35:12.680><c> yet</c><00:35:13.040><c> have</c><00:35:13.240><c> an</c><00:35:13.480><c> overwhelming</c><00:35:14.160><c> body</c><00:35:14.400><c> of</c>

00:35:14.510 --> 00:35:14.520 align:start position:0%
not yet have an overwhelming body of
 

00:35:14.520 --> 00:35:16.190 align:start position:0%
not yet have an overwhelming body of
empirical<00:35:14.880><c> studies</c><00:35:15.200><c> about</c><00:35:15.400><c> witness</c><00:35:15.640><c> behavior</c>

00:35:16.190 --> 00:35:16.200 align:start position:0%
empirical studies about witness behavior
 

00:35:16.200 --> 00:35:17.950 align:start position:0%
empirical studies about witness behavior
but<00:35:16.360><c> there</c><00:35:16.520><c> is</c><00:35:16.680><c> enough</c><00:35:16.880><c> research</c><00:35:17.240><c> to</c><00:35:17.360><c> suggest</c>

00:35:17.950 --> 00:35:17.960 align:start position:0%
but there is enough research to suggest
 

00:35:17.960 --> 00:35:19.830 align:start position:0%
but there is enough research to suggest
that<00:35:18.240><c> Gear's</c><00:35:18.520><c> assumption</c><00:35:18.960><c> is</c><00:35:19.160><c> flawed</c><00:35:19.680><c> and</c>

00:35:19.830 --> 00:35:19.840 align:start position:0%
that Gear's assumption is flawed and
 

00:35:19.840 --> 00:35:22.230 align:start position:0%
that Gear's assumption is flawed and
should<00:35:20.000><c> be</c><00:35:20.120><c> abandoned</c><00:35:20.560><c> of</c><00:35:20.720><c> course</c><00:35:21.280><c> that</c><00:35:21.880><c> oh</c>

00:35:22.230 --> 00:35:22.240 align:start position:0%
should be abandoned of course that oh
 

00:35:22.240 --> 00:35:23.350 align:start position:0%
should be abandoned of course that oh
alibi<00:35:22.520><c> witnesses</c><00:35:22.840><c> who</c><00:35:22.960><c> wouldn't</c><00:35:23.120><c> want</c><00:35:23.240><c> to</c><00:35:23.320><c> go</c>

00:35:23.350 --> 00:35:23.360 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses who wouldn't want to go
 

00:35:23.360 --> 00:35:24.230 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses who wouldn't want to go
to<00:35:23.440><c> the</c><00:35:23.480><c> police</c><00:35:23.680><c> we're</c><00:35:23.800><c> obviously</c><00:35:24.080><c> going</c><00:35:24.200><c> to</c>

00:35:24.230 --> 00:35:24.240 align:start position:0%
to the police we're obviously going to
 

00:35:24.240 --> 00:35:27.470 align:start position:0%
to the police we're obviously going to
discredit<00:35:24.600><c> them</c><00:35:24.800><c> right?</c><00:35:25.360><c> And</c><00:35:25.520><c> I</c><00:35:25.600><c> hope</c><00:35:26.000><c> that</c>

00:35:27.470 --> 00:35:27.480 align:start position:0%
discredit them right? And I hope that
 

00:35:27.480 --> 00:35:30.110 align:start position:0%
discredit them right? And I hope that
Hey<00:35:27.640><c> maybe</c><00:35:27.880><c> this</c><00:35:28.000><c> episode</c><00:35:28.600><c> will</c><00:35:29.680><c> inspire</c>

00:35:30.110 --> 00:35:30.120 align:start position:0%
Hey maybe this episode will inspire
 

00:35:30.120 --> 00:35:33.110 align:start position:0%
Hey maybe this episode will inspire
someone<00:35:30.640><c> to</c><00:35:31.640><c> add</c><00:35:31.960><c> to</c><00:35:32.080><c> that</c><00:35:32.320><c> body</c><00:35:32.600><c> of</c><00:35:32.720><c> empirical</c>

00:35:33.110 --> 00:35:33.120 align:start position:0%
someone to add to that body of empirical
 

00:35:33.120 --> 00:35:34.990 align:start position:0%
someone to add to that body of empirical
evidence<00:35:33.440><c> with</c><00:35:33.560><c> respect</c><00:35:33.880><c> to</c><00:35:34.120><c> alibis</c><00:35:34.800><c> and</c>

00:35:34.990 --> 00:35:35.000 align:start position:0%
evidence with respect to alibis and
 

00:35:35.000 --> 00:35:37.190 align:start position:0%
evidence with respect to alibis and
alibi<00:35:35.240><c> witnesses</c><00:35:35.960><c> and</c><00:35:36.400><c> the</c><00:35:36.640><c> presentation</c><00:35:37.120><c> of</c>

00:35:37.190 --> 00:35:37.200 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses and the presentation of
 

00:35:37.200 --> 00:35:40.390 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses and the presentation of
that<00:35:37.480><c> defense</c><00:35:38.600><c> so</c><00:35:38.760><c> that</c><00:35:39.000><c> we</c><00:35:39.200><c> can</c><00:35:39.560><c> get</c><00:35:40.000><c> even</c>

00:35:40.390 --> 00:35:40.400 align:start position:0%
that defense so that we can get even
 

00:35:40.400 --> 00:35:42.750 align:start position:0%
that defense so that we can get even
more<00:35:41.440><c> support</c>

00:35:42.750 --> 00:35:42.760 align:start position:0%
more support
 

00:35:42.760 --> 00:35:45.190 align:start position:0%
more support
for<00:35:43.440><c> modifying</c>

00:35:45.190 --> 00:35:45.200 align:start position:0%
for modifying
 

00:35:45.200 --> 00:35:47.990 align:start position:0%
for modifying
how<00:35:45.400><c> juries</c><00:35:46.080><c> believe</c><00:35:46.680><c> or</c><00:35:46.800><c> disbelieve</c><00:35:47.520><c> alibis</c>

00:35:47.990 --> 00:35:48.000 align:start position:0%
how juries believe or disbelieve alibis
 

00:35:48.000 --> 00:35:50.470 align:start position:0%
how juries believe or disbelieve alibis
and<00:35:48.480><c> and</c><00:35:49.040><c> alibi</c><00:35:49.280><c> testimony.</c>

00:35:50.470 --> 00:35:50.480 align:start position:0%
and and alibi testimony.
 

00:35:50.480 --> 00:35:52.350 align:start position:0%
and and alibi testimony.
Woof.<00:35:51.160><c> A</c><00:35:51.280><c> witness</c><00:35:51.720><c> may</c><00:35:51.840><c> be</c><00:35:51.960><c> afraid</c><00:35:52.200><c> to</c><00:35:52.240><c> get</c>

00:35:52.350 --> 00:35:52.360 align:start position:0%
Woof. A witness may be afraid to get
 

00:35:52.360 --> 00:35:54.030 align:start position:0%
Woof. A witness may be afraid to get
involved<00:35:52.640><c> in</c><00:35:52.720><c> a</c><00:35:52.760><c> criminal</c><00:35:53.080><c> case</c><00:35:53.480><c> or</c><00:35:53.640><c> to</c><00:35:53.760><c> go</c><00:35:53.920><c> to</c>

00:35:54.030 --> 00:35:54.040 align:start position:0%
involved in a criminal case or to go to
 

00:35:54.040 --> 00:35:56.110 align:start position:0%
involved in a criminal case or to go to
the<00:35:54.120><c> police</c><00:35:54.480><c> or</c><00:35:54.680><c> prosecutors</c><00:35:55.480><c> as</c><00:35:55.720><c> one</c><00:35:55.920><c> court</c>

00:35:56.110 --> 00:35:56.120 align:start position:0%
the police or prosecutors as one court
 

00:35:56.120 --> 00:35:58.430 align:start position:0%
the police or prosecutors as one court
observed<00:35:56.520><c> quote</c><00:35:57.120><c> it</c><00:35:57.280><c> is</c><00:35:57.440><c> a</c><00:35:57.520><c> lamentable</c><00:35:58.200><c> but</c>

00:35:58.430 --> 00:35:58.440 align:start position:0%
observed quote it is a lamentable but
 

00:35:58.440 --> 00:36:00.990 align:start position:0%
observed quote it is a lamentable but
undeniable<00:35:58.960><c> fact</c><00:35:59.640><c> of</c><00:35:59.760><c> modern</c><00:36:00.080><c> society</c><00:36:00.800><c> that</c>

00:36:00.990 --> 00:36:01.000 align:start position:0%
undeniable fact of modern society that
 

00:36:01.000 --> 00:36:03.790 align:start position:0%
undeniable fact of modern society that
some<00:36:01.160><c> of</c><00:36:01.280><c> our</c><00:36:01.360><c> citizens</c><00:36:01.720><c> harbor</c><00:36:02.360><c> a</c><00:36:02.560><c> mistrust</c>

00:36:03.790 --> 00:36:03.800 align:start position:0%
some of our citizens harbor a mistrust
 

00:36:03.800 --> 00:36:05.950 align:start position:0%
some of our citizens harbor a mistrust
for<00:36:04.000><c> law</c><00:36:04.200><c> enforcement</c><00:36:05.240><c> which</c><00:36:05.440><c> leads</c><00:36:05.640><c> them</c><00:36:05.800><c> to</c>

00:36:05.950 --> 00:36:05.960 align:start position:0%
for law enforcement which leads them to
 

00:36:05.960 --> 00:36:07.630 align:start position:0%
for law enforcement which leads them to
shun<00:36:06.280><c> contact</c><00:36:06.720><c> with</c><00:36:06.800><c> the</c><00:36:06.880><c> police</c><00:36:07.280><c> even</c><00:36:07.520><c> when</c>

00:36:07.630 --> 00:36:07.640 align:start position:0%
shun contact with the police even when
 

00:36:07.640 --> 00:36:09.830 align:start position:0%
shun contact with the police even when
the<00:36:07.760><c> avoidance</c><00:36:08.160><c> of</c><00:36:08.280><c> contact</c><00:36:09.080><c> is</c><00:36:09.280><c> not</c><00:36:09.600><c> in</c><00:36:09.720><c> their</c>

00:36:09.830 --> 00:36:09.840 align:start position:0%
the avoidance of contact is not in their
 

00:36:09.840 --> 00:36:12.630 align:start position:0%
the avoidance of contact is not in their
own<00:36:10.000><c> best</c><00:36:10.240><c> interest.</c><00:36:11.360><c> Absolutely.</c><00:36:12.400><c> As</c><00:36:12.560><c> a</c>

00:36:12.630 --> 00:36:12.640 align:start position:0%
own best interest. Absolutely. As a
 

00:36:12.640 --> 00:36:14.550 align:start position:0%
own best interest. Absolutely. As a
witness<00:36:12.920><c> explained</c><00:36:13.520><c> in</c><00:36:13.680><c> people</c><00:36:13.960><c> versus</c><00:36:14.280><c> Steed</c>

00:36:14.550 --> 00:36:14.560 align:start position:0%
witness explained in people versus Steed
 

00:36:14.560 --> 00:36:18.230 align:start position:0%
witness explained in people versus Steed
in<00:36:14.680><c> 1989</c><00:36:16.120><c> in</c><00:36:16.280><c> New</c><00:36:16.560><c> York</c><00:36:17.240><c> quote</c><00:36:18.000><c> there's</c>

00:36:18.230 --> 00:36:18.240 align:start position:0%
in 1989 in New York quote there's
 

00:36:18.240 --> 00:36:19.430 align:start position:0%
in 1989 in New York quote there's
reasons<00:36:18.640><c> why</c><00:36:18.760><c> you</c><00:36:18.840><c> don't</c><00:36:19.000><c> go</c><00:36:19.080><c> down</c><00:36:19.240><c> to</c><00:36:19.320><c> that</c>

00:36:19.430 --> 00:36:19.440 align:start position:0%
reasons why you don't go down to that
 

00:36:19.440 --> 00:36:21.070 align:start position:0%
reasons why you don't go down to that
precinct<00:36:19.840><c> to</c><00:36:19.920><c> volunteer</c><00:36:20.400><c> because</c><00:36:20.720><c> if</c><00:36:20.920><c> they</c>

00:36:21.070 --> 00:36:21.080 align:start position:0%
precinct to volunteer because if they
 

00:36:21.080 --> 00:36:22.350 align:start position:0%
precinct to volunteer because if they
see<00:36:21.240><c> you</c><00:36:21.360><c> in</c><00:36:21.440><c> the</c><00:36:21.520><c> presence</c><00:36:21.800><c> of</c><00:36:21.880><c> other</c><00:36:22.040><c> people</c>

00:36:22.350 --> 00:36:22.360 align:start position:0%
see you in the presence of other people
 

00:36:22.360 --> 00:36:24.590 align:start position:0%
see you in the presence of other people
they<00:36:22.520><c> may</c><00:36:22.760><c> lock</c><00:36:23.040><c> you</c><00:36:23.160><c> up</c><00:36:23.280><c> too</c><00:36:23.520><c> for</c><00:36:23.720><c> no</c><00:36:23.920><c> reason.</c>

00:36:24.590 --> 00:36:24.600 align:start position:0%
they may lock you up too for no reason.
 

00:36:24.600 --> 00:36:26.870 align:start position:0%
they may lock you up too for no reason.
That<00:36:25.200><c> was</c><00:36:25.360><c> not</c><00:36:25.840><c> and</c><00:36:26.040><c> still</c><00:36:26.320><c> is</c><00:36:26.480><c> not</c><00:36:26.760><c> an</c>

00:36:26.870 --> 00:36:26.880 align:start position:0%
That was not and still is not an
 

00:36:26.880 --> 00:36:28.830 align:start position:0%
That was not and still is not an
unreasonable<00:36:27.360><c> fear.</c><00:36:27.920><c> Korey</c><00:36:28.240><c> Wise,</c><00:36:28.640><c> one</c><00:36:28.760><c> of</c>

00:36:28.830 --> 00:36:28.840 align:start position:0%
unreasonable fear. Korey Wise, one of
 

00:36:28.840 --> 00:36:31.030 align:start position:0%
unreasonable fear. Korey Wise, one of
the<00:36:28.920><c> defendants</c><00:36:29.280><c> in</c><00:36:29.360><c> the</c><00:36:29.480><c> Central</c><00:36:29.960><c> Park</c><00:36:30.640><c> Five</c>

00:36:31.030 --> 00:36:31.040 align:start position:0%
the defendants in the Central Park Five
 

00:36:31.040 --> 00:36:32.590 align:start position:0%
the defendants in the Central Park Five
case,<00:36:31.360><c> became</c><00:36:31.640><c> a</c><00:36:31.680><c> suspect</c><00:36:32.160><c> and</c><00:36:32.280><c> falsely</c>

00:36:32.590 --> 00:36:32.600 align:start position:0%
case, became a suspect and falsely
 

00:36:32.600 --> 00:36:34.710 align:start position:0%
case, became a suspect and falsely
confessed<00:36:32.920><c> to</c><00:36:32.960><c> the</c><00:36:33.040><c> crime</c><00:36:33.800><c> having</c><00:36:34.240><c> gone</c><00:36:34.640><c> to</c>

00:36:34.710 --> 00:36:34.720 align:start position:0%
confessed to the crime having gone to
 

00:36:34.720 --> 00:36:37.510 align:start position:0%
confessed to the crime having gone to
the<00:36:34.840><c> station</c><00:36:35.920><c> as</c><00:36:36.160><c> an</c><00:36:36.320><c> alibi</c><00:36:36.720><c> witness</c><00:36:37.240><c> for</c>

00:36:37.510 --> 00:36:37.520 align:start position:0%
the station as an alibi witness for
 

00:36:37.520 --> 00:36:40.190 align:start position:0%
the station as an alibi witness for
Yusef<00:36:38.040><c> Salaam.</c><00:36:38.920><c> Witnesses</c><00:36:39.520><c> may</c><00:36:39.680><c> be</c><00:36:39.880><c> afraid</c><00:36:40.120><c> of</c>

00:36:40.190 --> 00:36:40.200 align:start position:0%
Yusef Salaam. Witnesses may be afraid of
 

00:36:40.200 --> 00:36:41.870 align:start position:0%
Yusef Salaam. Witnesses may be afraid of
the<00:36:40.280><c> police</c><00:36:40.560><c> in</c><00:36:40.760><c> general,</c><00:36:41.360><c> not</c><00:36:41.640><c> just</c><00:36:41.840><c> in</c>

00:36:41.870 --> 00:36:41.880 align:start position:0%
the police in general, not just in
 

00:36:41.880 --> 00:36:44.270 align:start position:0%
the police in general, not just in
relation<00:36:42.200><c> to</c><00:36:42.280><c> the</c><00:36:42.360><c> specific</c><00:36:42.720><c> case</c><00:36:42.960><c> they</c><00:36:43.640><c> have</c>

00:36:44.270 --> 00:36:44.280 align:start position:0%
relation to the specific case they have
 

00:36:44.280 --> 00:36:46.310 align:start position:0%
relation to the specific case they have
someone's<00:36:44.680><c> alibi</c><00:36:45.080><c> for,</c><00:36:45.760><c> or</c><00:36:45.960><c> may</c><00:36:46.120><c> have</c>

00:36:46.310 --> 00:36:46.320 align:start position:0%
someone's alibi for, or may have
 

00:36:46.320 --> 00:36:47.950 align:start position:0%
someone's alibi for, or may have
immigration<00:36:46.800><c> issues,</c><00:36:47.120><c> child</c><00:36:47.600><c> custody</c>

00:36:47.950 --> 00:36:47.960 align:start position:0%
immigration issues, child custody
 

00:36:47.960 --> 00:36:49.830 align:start position:0%
immigration issues, child custody
issues,<00:36:48.320><c> or</c><00:36:48.480><c> pending</c><00:36:48.760><c> criminal</c><00:36:49.040><c> charges</c><00:36:49.680><c> that</c>

00:36:49.830 --> 00:36:49.840 align:start position:0%
issues, or pending criminal charges that
 

00:36:49.840 --> 00:36:51.670 align:start position:0%
issues, or pending criminal charges that
make<00:36:50.080><c> them</c><00:36:50.280><c> particularly</c><00:36:50.920><c> concerned</c><00:36:51.440><c> about</c>

00:36:51.670 --> 00:36:51.680 align:start position:0%
make them particularly concerned about
 

00:36:51.680 --> 00:36:53.630 align:start position:0%
make them particularly concerned about
contradicting<00:36:52.240><c> the</c><00:36:52.320><c> police</c><00:36:52.680><c> narrative.</c><00:36:53.520><c> If</c>

00:36:53.630 --> 00:36:53.640 align:start position:0%
contradicting the police narrative. If
 

00:36:53.640 --> 00:36:55.230 align:start position:0%
contradicting the police narrative. If
the<00:36:53.720><c> case</c><00:36:53.920><c> has</c><00:36:54.080><c> received</c><00:36:54.440><c> significant</c><00:36:55.160><c> media</c>

00:36:55.230 --> 00:36:55.240 align:start position:0%
the case has received significant media
 

00:36:55.240 --> 00:36:56.430 align:start position:0%
the case has received significant media
attention,<00:36:55.600><c> the</c><00:36:55.680><c> witness</c><00:36:55.920><c> may</c><00:36:56.000><c> be</c><00:36:56.120><c> afraid</c><00:36:56.360><c> of</c>

00:36:56.430 --> 00:36:56.440 align:start position:0%
attention, the witness may be afraid of
 

00:36:56.440 --> 00:36:58.470 align:start position:0%
attention, the witness may be afraid of
becoming<00:36:57.000><c> part</c><00:36:57.360><c> of</c><00:36:57.480><c> this</c><00:36:57.680><c> story</c><00:36:58.080><c> and</c><00:36:58.200><c> having</c>

00:36:58.470 --> 00:36:58.480 align:start position:0%
becoming part of this story and having
 

00:36:58.480 --> 00:37:00.430 align:start position:0%
becoming part of this story and having
their<00:36:58.640><c> name</c><00:36:58.960><c> connected</c><00:36:59.360><c> with</c><00:36:59.440><c> the</c><00:36:59.520><c> case</c><00:36:59.840><c> for</c>

00:37:00.430 --> 00:37:00.440 align:start position:0%
their name connected with the case for
 

00:37:00.440 --> 00:37:02.990 align:start position:0%
their name connected with the case for
all<00:37:01.040><c> time.</c><00:37:01.560><c> The</c><00:37:01.680><c> wit-</c><00:37:02.120><c> The</c><00:37:02.240><c> witness</c><00:37:02.640><c> may</c><00:37:02.800><c> also</c>

00:37:02.990 --> 00:37:03.000 align:start position:0%
all time. The wit- The witness may also
 

00:37:03.000 --> 00:37:04.030 align:start position:0%
all time. The wit- The witness may also
be<00:37:03.080><c> afraid</c><00:37:03.320><c> of</c><00:37:03.400><c> disapproval</c><00:37:03.840><c> from</c><00:37:03.960><c> the</c>

00:37:04.030 --> 00:37:04.040 align:start position:0%
be afraid of disapproval from the
 

00:37:04.040 --> 00:37:06.310 align:start position:0%
be afraid of disapproval from the
victim's<00:37:04.360><c> family</c><00:37:04.640><c> or</c><00:37:04.880><c> friends.</c><00:37:05.880><c> Witnesses</c>

00:37:06.310 --> 00:37:06.320 align:start position:0%
victim's family or friends. Witnesses
 

00:37:06.320 --> 00:37:07.630 align:start position:0%
victim's family or friends. Witnesses
may<00:37:06.480><c> believe</c><00:37:06.840><c> that</c><00:37:06.960><c> once</c><00:37:07.160><c> the</c><00:37:07.200><c> defendant</c><00:37:07.520><c> has</c>

00:37:07.630 --> 00:37:07.640 align:start position:0%
may believe that once the defendant has
 

00:37:07.640 --> 00:37:08.710 align:start position:0%
may believe that once the defendant has
been<00:37:07.760><c> arrested,</c><00:37:08.160><c> going</c><00:37:08.320><c> to</c><00:37:08.400><c> the</c><00:37:08.440><c> police</c><00:37:08.640><c> or</c>

00:37:08.710 --> 00:37:08.720 align:start position:0%
been arrested, going to the police or
 

00:37:08.720 --> 00:37:10.630 align:start position:0%
been arrested, going to the police or
prosecutors,<00:37:09.200><c> even</c><00:37:09.400><c> with</c><00:37:09.520><c> a</c><00:37:09.560><c> strong</c><00:37:09.840><c> alibi,</c>

00:37:10.630 --> 00:37:10.640 align:start position:0%
prosecutors, even with a strong alibi,
 

00:37:10.640 --> 00:37:12.630 align:start position:0%
prosecutors, even with a strong alibi,
will<00:37:10.880><c> not</c><00:37:11.160><c> lead</c><00:37:11.360><c> to</c><00:37:11.440><c> the</c><00:37:11.560><c> end</c><00:37:11.720><c> of</c><00:37:11.800><c> the</c><00:37:11.880><c> case.</c>

00:37:12.630 --> 00:37:12.640 align:start position:0%
will not lead to the end of the case.
 

00:37:12.640 --> 00:37:13.950 align:start position:0%
will not lead to the end of the case.
The<00:37:12.760><c> further</c><00:37:13.000><c> along</c><00:37:13.200><c> the</c><00:37:13.280><c> case</c><00:37:13.520><c> is,</c><00:37:13.720><c> the</c><00:37:13.800><c> less</c>

00:37:13.950 --> 00:37:13.960 align:start position:0%
The further along the case is, the less
 

00:37:13.960 --> 00:37:15.350 align:start position:0%
The further along the case is, the less
likely<00:37:14.200><c> it</c><00:37:14.320><c> is</c><00:37:14.440><c> that</c><00:37:14.560><c> exculpatory</c><00:37:15.040><c> evidence</c>

00:37:15.350 --> 00:37:15.360 align:start position:0%
likely it is that exculpatory evidence
 

00:37:15.360 --> 00:37:17.710 align:start position:0%
likely it is that exculpatory evidence
would<00:37:15.480><c> lead</c><00:37:15.640><c> to</c><00:37:15.720><c> a</c><00:37:15.760><c> dismissal</c><00:37:16.920><c> instead</c><00:37:17.600><c> of</c>

00:37:17.710 --> 00:37:17.720 align:start position:0%
would lead to a dismissal instead of
 

00:37:17.720 --> 00:37:19.390 align:start position:0%
would lead to a dismissal instead of
giving<00:37:17.920><c> the</c><00:37:17.960><c> prosecutor</c><00:37:18.440><c> time</c><00:37:18.720><c> to</c><00:37:18.840><c> prepare</c><00:37:19.240><c> an</c>

00:37:19.390 --> 00:37:19.400 align:start position:0%
giving the prosecutor time to prepare an
 

00:37:19.400 --> 00:37:21.990 align:start position:0%
giving the prosecutor time to prepare an
attack<00:37:19.840><c> on</c><00:37:19.960><c> the</c><00:37:20.080><c> evidence.</c><00:37:20.880><c> No</c><00:37:21.400><c> empirical</c>

00:37:21.990 --> 00:37:22.000 align:start position:0%
attack on the evidence. No empirical
 

00:37:22.000 --> 00:37:24.990 align:start position:0%
attack on the evidence. No empirical
research<00:37:22.600><c> exists</c><00:37:23.400><c> to</c><00:37:23.520><c> suggest</c><00:37:24.000><c> that</c><00:37:24.200><c> alibis</c>

00:37:24.990 --> 00:37:25.000 align:start position:0%
research exists to suggest that alibis
 

00:37:25.000 --> 00:37:26.190 align:start position:0%
research exists to suggest that alibis
presented<00:37:25.440><c> early</c><00:37:25.680><c> in</c><00:37:25.800><c> the</c><00:37:25.920><c> criminal</c>

00:37:26.190 --> 00:37:26.200 align:start position:0%
presented early in the criminal
 

00:37:26.200 --> 00:37:28.590 align:start position:0%
presented early in the criminal
investigation<00:37:26.720><c> process</c><00:37:27.560><c> are</c><00:37:27.760><c> better</c><00:37:28.280><c> for</c><00:37:28.480><c> an</c>

00:37:28.590 --> 00:37:28.600 align:start position:0%
investigation process are better for an
 

00:37:28.600 --> 00:37:30.950 align:start position:0%
investigation process are better for an
innocent<00:37:28.960><c> suspect.</c><00:37:29.640><c> Now,</c><00:37:29.920><c> as</c><00:37:30.200><c> for</c><00:37:30.520><c> potential</c>

00:37:30.950 --> 00:37:30.960 align:start position:0%
innocent suspect. Now, as for potential
 

00:37:30.960 --> 00:37:33.310 align:start position:0%
innocent suspect. Now, as for potential
alibi<00:37:31.240><c> witnesses</c><00:37:31.800><c> and</c><00:37:32.000><c> defense</c><00:37:32.400><c> counsel,</c>

00:37:33.310 --> 00:37:33.320 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses and defense counsel,
 

00:37:33.320 --> 00:37:35.470 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses and defense counsel,
they<00:37:33.640><c> are</c><00:37:34.000><c> your</c><00:37:34.200><c> defense</c><00:37:34.480><c> attorney</c><00:37:34.920><c> is</c>

00:37:35.470 --> 00:37:35.480 align:start position:0%
they are your defense attorney is
 

00:37:35.480 --> 00:37:37.310 align:start position:0%
they are your defense attorney is
obligated<00:37:36.000><c> to</c><00:37:36.120><c> make</c><00:37:36.400><c> all</c><00:37:36.640><c> reasonable</c><00:37:37.000><c> efforts</c>

00:37:37.310 --> 00:37:37.320 align:start position:0%
obligated to make all reasonable efforts
 

00:37:37.320 --> 00:37:39.070 align:start position:0%
obligated to make all reasonable efforts
to<00:37:37.440><c> identify</c><00:37:38.000><c> and</c><00:37:38.280><c> interview</c><00:37:38.680><c> potential</c>

00:37:39.070 --> 00:37:39.080 align:start position:0%
to identify and interview potential
 

00:37:39.080 --> 00:37:40.470 align:start position:0%
to identify and interview potential
alibi<00:37:39.360><c> witnesses,</c><00:37:39.920><c> even</c><00:37:40.120><c> if</c><00:37:40.200><c> they</c><00:37:40.280><c> don't</c>

00:37:40.470 --> 00:37:40.480 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses, even if they don't
 

00:37:40.480 --> 00:37:41.990 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses, even if they don't
ultimately<00:37:41.040><c> put</c><00:37:41.240><c> on</c><00:37:41.400><c> that</c><00:37:41.560><c> evidence</c><00:37:41.880><c> at</c>

00:37:41.990 --> 00:37:42.000 align:start position:0%
ultimately put on that evidence at
 

00:37:42.000 --> 00:37:43.790 align:start position:0%
ultimately put on that evidence at
trial.<00:37:42.520><c> They</c><00:37:42.720><c> should</c><00:37:43.000><c> make</c><00:37:43.160><c> every</c><00:37:43.480><c> reasonable</c>

00:37:43.790 --> 00:37:43.800 align:start position:0%
trial. They should make every reasonable
 

00:37:43.800 --> 00:37:46.710 align:start position:0%
trial. They should make every reasonable
effort<00:37:44.080><c> to</c><00:37:44.240><c> investigate</c><00:37:45.480><c> any</c><00:37:45.760><c> alibi</c><00:37:46.200><c> you</c><00:37:46.480><c> try</c>

00:37:46.710 --> 00:37:46.720 align:start position:0%
effort to investigate any alibi you try
 

00:37:46.720 --> 00:37:49.230 align:start position:0%
effort to investigate any alibi you try
to<00:37:47.200><c> put</c><00:37:47.400><c> forth,</c><00:37:47.720><c> right,</c><00:37:47.920><c> with</c><00:37:48.120><c> them</c><00:37:48.960><c> as</c><00:37:49.120><c> you're</c>

00:37:49.230 --> 00:37:49.240 align:start position:0%
to put forth, right, with them as you're
 

00:37:49.240 --> 00:37:50.910 align:start position:0%
to put forth, right, with them as you're
planning<00:37:49.520><c> your</c><00:37:49.600><c> defense.</c><00:37:50.360><c> This</c><00:37:50.520><c> includes</c>

00:37:50.910 --> 00:37:50.920 align:start position:0%
planning your defense. This includes
 

00:37:50.920 --> 00:37:52.350 align:start position:0%
planning your defense. This includes
reasonable<00:37:51.240><c> efforts</c><00:37:51.480><c> to</c><00:37:51.600><c> identify</c><00:37:52.120><c> and</c>

00:37:52.350 --> 00:37:52.360 align:start position:0%
reasonable efforts to identify and
 

00:37:52.360 --> 00:37:53.790 align:start position:0%
reasonable efforts to identify and
locate<00:37:52.680><c> witnesses,</c><00:37:53.120><c> even</c><00:37:53.320><c> if</c><00:37:53.400><c> the</c><00:37:53.480><c> defendant</c>

00:37:53.790 --> 00:37:53.800 align:start position:0%
locate witnesses, even if the defendant
 

00:37:53.800 --> 00:37:55.390 align:start position:0%
locate witnesses, even if the defendant
doesn't<00:37:54.000><c> know</c><00:37:54.080><c> their</c><00:37:54.200><c> full</c><00:37:54.400><c> names.</c><00:37:55.240><c> Quote,</c>

00:37:55.390 --> 00:37:55.400 align:start position:0%
doesn't know their full names. Quote,
 

00:37:55.400 --> 00:37:56.990 align:start position:0%
doesn't know their full names. Quote,
"Counsel<00:37:55.760><c> reasonably</c><00:37:56.240><c> cannot</c><00:37:56.600><c> limit</c><00:37:56.880><c> the</c>

00:37:56.990 --> 00:37:57.000 align:start position:0%
"Counsel reasonably cannot limit the
 

00:37:57.000 --> 00:37:58.470 align:start position:0%
"Counsel reasonably cannot limit the
pre-trial<00:37:57.360><c> investigation</c><00:37:57.800><c> of</c><00:37:57.880><c> a</c><00:37:57.920><c> case</c><00:37:58.280><c> to</c>

00:37:58.470 --> 00:37:58.480 align:start position:0%
pre-trial investigation of a case to
 

00:37:58.480 --> 00:38:00.070 align:start position:0%
pre-trial investigation of a case to
only<00:37:58.760><c> those</c><00:37:59.000><c> leads</c><00:37:59.320><c> offered</c><00:37:59.600><c> by</c><00:37:59.680><c> the</c><00:37:59.800><c> client</c>

00:38:00.070 --> 00:38:00.080 align:start position:0%
only those leads offered by the client
 

00:38:00.080 --> 00:38:02.150 align:start position:0%
only those leads offered by the client
himself.<00:38:00.640><c> Counsel</c><00:38:01.000><c> has</c><00:38:01.160><c> an</c><00:38:01.280><c> independent</c><00:38:01.880><c> duty</c>

00:38:02.150 --> 00:38:02.160 align:start position:0%
himself. Counsel has an independent duty
 

00:38:02.160 --> 00:38:03.590 align:start position:0%
himself. Counsel has an independent duty
to<00:38:02.280><c> investigate</c><00:38:02.880><c> potentially</c><00:38:03.280><c> important</c>

00:38:03.590 --> 00:38:03.600 align:start position:0%
to investigate potentially important
 

00:38:03.600 --> 00:38:05.550 align:start position:0%
to investigate potentially important
witnesses<00:38:04.040><c> not</c><00:38:04.200><c> suggested</c><00:38:04.560><c> by</c><00:38:04.640><c> the</c><00:38:04.720><c> client,</c>

00:38:05.550 --> 00:38:05.560 align:start position:0%
witnesses not suggested by the client,
 

00:38:05.560 --> 00:38:07.390 align:start position:0%
witnesses not suggested by the client,
including,<00:38:06.080><c> of</c><00:38:06.200><c> course,</c><00:38:06.880><c> potentially</c>

00:38:07.390 --> 00:38:07.400 align:start position:0%
including, of course, potentially
 

00:38:07.400 --> 00:38:09.990 align:start position:0%
including, of course, potentially
important<00:38:08.000><c> alibi</c><00:38:08.360><c> witnesses.</c><00:38:09.200><c> A</c><00:38:09.280><c> decision</c><00:38:09.840><c> by</c>

00:38:09.990 --> 00:38:10.000 align:start position:0%
important alibi witnesses. A decision by
 

00:38:10.000 --> 00:38:11.870 align:start position:0%
important alibi witnesses. A decision by
counsel<00:38:10.320><c> to</c><00:38:10.480><c> forego</c><00:38:11.000><c> an</c><00:38:11.120><c> investigation</c><00:38:11.720><c> into</c>

00:38:11.870 --> 00:38:11.880 align:start position:0%
counsel to forego an investigation into
 

00:38:11.880 --> 00:38:13.510 align:start position:0%
counsel to forego an investigation into
the<00:38:12.000><c> possible</c><00:38:12.360><c> testimony</c><00:38:12.800><c> of</c><00:38:12.920><c> a</c><00:38:12.960><c> potentially</c>

00:38:13.510 --> 00:38:13.520 align:start position:0%
the possible testimony of a potentially
 

00:38:13.520 --> 00:38:15.710 align:start position:0%
the possible testimony of a potentially
significant<00:38:14.080><c> witness</c><00:38:14.720><c> is</c><00:38:14.880><c> constitutionally</c>

00:38:15.710 --> 00:38:15.720 align:start position:0%
significant witness is constitutionally
 

00:38:15.720 --> 00:38:18.670 align:start position:0%
significant witness is constitutionally
impermissible<00:38:17.000><c> unless</c><00:38:17.200><c> counsel</c><00:38:17.480><c> has</c><00:38:17.680><c> a</c><00:38:17.760><c> sound</c>

00:38:18.670 --> 00:38:18.680 align:start position:0%
impermissible unless counsel has a sound
 

00:38:18.680 --> 00:38:20.870 align:start position:0%
impermissible unless counsel has a sound
justification<00:38:19.320><c> for</c><00:38:19.400><c> doing</c><00:38:19.600><c> so.</c><00:38:20.200><c> Speculation,</c>

00:38:20.870 --> 00:38:20.880 align:start position:0%
justification for doing so. Speculation,
 

00:38:20.880 --> 00:38:22.830 align:start position:0%
justification for doing so. Speculation,
guesswork,<00:38:21.640><c> or</c><00:38:21.880><c> uninformed</c><00:38:22.400><c> assumptions</c>

00:38:22.830 --> 00:38:22.840 align:start position:0%
guesswork, or uninformed assumptions
 

00:38:22.840 --> 00:38:24.510 align:start position:0%
guesswork, or uninformed assumptions
about<00:38:23.080><c> the</c><00:38:23.160><c> availability</c><00:38:23.800><c> or</c><00:38:24.040><c> import</c><00:38:24.360><c> of</c><00:38:24.440><c> the</c>

00:38:24.510 --> 00:38:24.520 align:start position:0%
about the availability or import of the
 

00:38:24.520 --> 00:38:26.990 align:start position:0%
about the availability or import of the
testimony<00:38:25.080><c> will</c><00:38:25.480><c> not</c><00:38:25.880><c> suffice.</c><00:38:26.560><c> Extremely</c>

00:38:26.990 --> 00:38:27.000 align:start position:0%
testimony will not suffice. Extremely
 

00:38:27.000 --> 00:38:28.870 align:start position:0%
testimony will not suffice. Extremely
important<00:38:27.320><c> rule,</c><00:38:27.680><c> and</c><00:38:28.040><c> defense</c><00:38:28.480><c> counsel,</c>

00:38:28.870 --> 00:38:28.880 align:start position:0%
important rule, and defense counsel,
 

00:38:28.880 --> 00:38:30.870 align:start position:0%
important rule, and defense counsel,
right,<00:38:29.080><c> are</c><00:38:29.200><c> held</c><00:38:29.360><c> accountable.</c>

00:38:30.870 --> 00:38:30.880 align:start position:0%
right, are held accountable.
 

00:38:30.880 --> 00:38:33.590 align:start position:0%
right, are held accountable.
Prosecutors<00:38:31.840><c> are</c><00:38:32.040><c> not.</c><00:38:32.520><c> Once</c><00:38:32.760><c> counsel</c><00:38:33.160><c> learns</c>

00:38:33.590 --> 00:38:33.600 align:start position:0%
Prosecutors are not. Once counsel learns
 

00:38:33.600 --> 00:38:35.350 align:start position:0%
Prosecutors are not. Once counsel learns
of<00:38:33.680><c> an</c><00:38:33.760><c> alibi</c><00:38:34.160><c> or</c><00:38:34.360><c> alibi</c><00:38:34.640><c> witness,</c><00:38:34.960><c> he</c><00:38:35.080><c> or</c><00:38:35.160><c> she</c>

00:38:35.350 --> 00:38:35.360 align:start position:0%
of an alibi or alibi witness, he or she
 

00:38:35.360 --> 00:38:37.070 align:start position:0%
of an alibi or alibi witness, he or she
must<00:38:35.720><c> consider</c><00:38:36.160><c> whether</c><00:38:36.400><c> the</c><00:38:36.520><c> jurisdiction</c>

00:38:37.070 --> 00:38:37.080 align:start position:0%
must consider whether the jurisdiction
 

00:38:37.080 --> 00:38:38.750 align:start position:0%
must consider whether the jurisdiction
has<00:38:37.280><c> a</c><00:38:37.320><c> notice</c><00:38:37.720><c> of</c><00:38:37.880><c> alibi</c><00:38:38.240><c> defense</c>

00:38:38.750 --> 00:38:38.760 align:start position:0%
has a notice of alibi defense
 

00:38:38.760 --> 00:38:41.470 align:start position:0%
has a notice of alibi defense
requirement,<00:38:39.520><c> and</c><00:38:39.720><c> if</c><00:38:39.880><c> so,</c><00:38:40.600><c> when</c><00:38:41.000><c> it</c><00:38:41.160><c> must</c><00:38:41.360><c> be</c>

00:38:41.470 --> 00:38:41.480 align:start position:0%
requirement, and if so, when it must be
 

00:38:41.480 --> 00:38:43.510 align:start position:0%
requirement, and if so, when it must be
complied<00:38:42.000><c> with.</c><00:38:42.520><c> Notice</c><00:38:42.800><c> of</c><00:38:42.880><c> alibi</c><00:38:43.160><c> rules</c>

00:38:43.510 --> 00:38:43.520 align:start position:0%
complied with. Notice of alibi rules
 

00:38:43.520 --> 00:38:45.670 align:start position:0%
complied with. Notice of alibi rules
were<00:38:43.640><c> enacted</c><00:38:44.240><c> in</c><00:38:44.320><c> the</c><00:38:44.480><c> early</c><00:38:44.840><c> 20th</c><00:38:45.200><c> century</c>

00:38:45.670 --> 00:38:45.680 align:start position:0%
were enacted in the early 20th century
 

00:38:45.680 --> 00:38:47.750 align:start position:0%
were enacted in the early 20th century
and<00:38:45.880><c> dramatically</c><00:38:46.640><c> reduced</c><00:38:47.200><c> the</c><00:38:47.360><c> use</c><00:38:47.600><c> of</c>

00:38:47.750 --> 00:38:47.760 align:start position:0%
and dramatically reduced the use of
 

00:38:47.760 --> 00:38:50.470 align:start position:0%
and dramatically reduced the use of
alibi<00:38:48.120><c> defenses</c><00:38:48.720><c> at</c><00:38:48.960><c> trial.</c><00:38:50.080><c> Quote,</c>

00:38:50.470 --> 00:38:50.480 align:start position:0%
alibi defenses at trial. Quote,
 

00:38:50.480 --> 00:38:52.230 align:start position:0%
alibi defenses at trial. Quote,
"Convictions<00:38:51.040><c> where</c><00:38:51.280><c> an</c><00:38:51.400><c> alibi</c><00:38:51.680><c> was</c><00:38:51.840><c> offered</c>

00:38:52.230 --> 00:38:52.240 align:start position:0%
"Convictions where an alibi was offered
 

00:38:52.240 --> 00:38:54.630 align:start position:0%
"Convictions where an alibi was offered
had<00:38:52.400><c> greatly</c><00:38:52.840><c> increased</c><00:38:53.760><c> since</c><00:38:54.000><c> passage</c><00:38:54.520><c> of</c>

00:38:54.630 --> 00:38:54.640 align:start position:0%
had greatly increased since passage of
 

00:38:54.640 --> 00:38:56.910 align:start position:0%
had greatly increased since passage of
the<00:38:54.800><c> act.</c><00:38:55.680><c> In</c><00:38:55.880><c> one</c><00:38:56.040><c> survey</c><00:38:56.320><c> of</c><00:38:56.400><c> prosecutors,</c>

00:38:56.910 --> 00:38:56.920 align:start position:0%
the act. In one survey of prosecutors,
 

00:38:56.920 --> 00:38:58.790 align:start position:0%
the act. In one survey of prosecutors,
81%<00:38:57.560><c> of</c><00:38:57.640><c> respondents</c><00:38:58.080><c> said</c><00:38:58.200><c> that</c><00:38:58.360><c> alibis</c>

00:38:58.790 --> 00:38:58.800 align:start position:0%
81% of respondents said that alibis
 

00:38:58.800 --> 00:39:00.390 align:start position:0%
81% of respondents said that alibis
were,<00:38:59.160><c> quote,</c><00:38:59.600><c> only</c><00:38:59.880><c> occasionally</c>

00:39:00.390 --> 00:39:00.400 align:start position:0%
were, quote, only occasionally
 

00:39:00.400 --> 00:39:02.510 align:start position:0%
were, quote, only occasionally
successful.<00:39:01.280><c> 11%</c><00:39:02.000><c> said</c><00:39:02.120><c> that</c><00:39:02.240><c> they</c><00:39:02.360><c> were</c>

00:39:02.510 --> 00:39:02.520 align:start position:0%
successful. 11% said that they were
 

00:39:02.520 --> 00:39:05.470 align:start position:0%
successful. 11% said that they were
successful<00:39:03.480><c> about</c><00:39:03.760><c> half</c><00:39:03.960><c> the</c><00:39:04.080><c> time.</c><00:39:04.720><c> Only</c><00:39:05.040><c> 8%</c>

00:39:05.470 --> 00:39:05.480 align:start position:0%
successful about half the time. Only 8%
 

00:39:05.480 --> 00:39:07.870 align:start position:0%
successful about half the time. Only 8%
recorded<00:39:05.960><c> more</c><00:39:06.160><c> frequent</c><00:39:06.600><c> success."</c><00:39:07.200><c> But,</c><00:39:07.600><c> as</c>

00:39:07.870 --> 00:39:07.880 align:start position:0%
recorded more frequent success." But, as
 

00:39:07.880 --> 00:39:09.710 align:start position:0%
recorded more frequent success." But, as
we<00:39:08.080><c> have</c><00:39:08.280><c> suggested</c><00:39:08.720><c> in</c><00:39:08.800><c> this</c><00:39:08.920><c> episode,</c><00:39:09.520><c> this</c>

00:39:09.710 --> 00:39:09.720 align:start position:0%
we have suggested in this episode, this
 

00:39:09.720 --> 00:39:11.590 align:start position:0%
we have suggested in this episode, this
decline<00:39:10.280><c> may</c><00:39:10.440><c> not</c><00:39:10.680><c> have</c><00:39:10.840><c> been</c><00:39:11.000><c> entirely</c><00:39:11.440><c> due</c>

00:39:11.590 --> 00:39:11.600 align:start position:0%
decline may not have been entirely due
 

00:39:11.600 --> 00:39:14.190 align:start position:0%
decline may not have been entirely due
to<00:39:11.720><c> deterring</c><00:39:12.320><c> false</c><00:39:12.600><c> alibis,</c><00:39:13.600><c> but</c><00:39:13.840><c> could</c>

00:39:14.190 --> 00:39:14.200 align:start position:0%
to deterring false alibis, but could
 

00:39:14.200 --> 00:39:16.550 align:start position:0%
to deterring false alibis, but could
include<00:39:14.800><c> accurate,</c><00:39:15.640><c> truthful</c><00:39:16.240><c> alibi</c>

00:39:16.550 --> 00:39:16.560 align:start position:0%
include accurate, truthful alibi
 

00:39:16.560 --> 00:39:19.350 align:start position:0%
include accurate, truthful alibi
witnesses<00:39:17.000><c> deterred</c><00:39:17.840><c> by</c><00:39:17.960><c> prosecutor</c><00:39:18.840><c> or</c><00:39:19.120><c> law</c>

00:39:19.350 --> 00:39:19.360 align:start position:0%
witnesses deterred by prosecutor or law
 

00:39:19.360 --> 00:39:21.950 align:start position:0%
witnesses deterred by prosecutor or law
enforcement<00:39:20.280><c> questioning,</c><00:39:20.800><c> interrogations,</c>

00:39:21.950 --> 00:39:21.960 align:start position:0%
enforcement questioning, interrogations,
 

00:39:21.960 --> 00:39:24.430 align:start position:0%
enforcement questioning, interrogations,
right?<00:39:22.640><c> That</c><00:39:23.080><c> prevented</c><00:39:23.520><c> them</c><00:39:23.880><c> or</c><00:39:24.000><c> deterred</c>

00:39:24.430 --> 00:39:24.440 align:start position:0%
right? That prevented them or deterred
 

00:39:24.440 --> 00:39:26.870 align:start position:0%
right? That prevented them or deterred
them<00:39:24.680><c> from</c><00:39:24.880><c> giving</c><00:39:25.160><c> strong</c><00:39:25.560><c> testimony</c><00:39:26.200><c> or</c>

00:39:26.870 --> 00:39:26.880 align:start position:0%
them from giving strong testimony or
 

00:39:26.880 --> 00:39:28.590 align:start position:0%
them from giving strong testimony or
deciding<00:39:27.240><c> to</c><00:39:27.320><c> testify</c><00:39:27.720><c> at</c><00:39:27.840><c> all.</c><00:39:28.160><c> Notice</c><00:39:28.480><c> of</c>

00:39:28.590 --> 00:39:28.600 align:start position:0%
deciding to testify at all. Notice of
 

00:39:28.600 --> 00:39:30.870 align:start position:0%
deciding to testify at all. Notice of
alibi<00:39:28.840><c> rules</c><00:39:29.120><c> were</c><00:39:29.280><c> again</c><00:39:29.640><c> enacted</c><00:39:30.280><c> to</c><00:39:30.400><c> try</c><00:39:30.680><c> to</c>

00:39:30.870 --> 00:39:30.880 align:start position:0%
alibi rules were again enacted to try to
 

00:39:30.880 --> 00:39:34.190 align:start position:0%
alibi rules were again enacted to try to
combat<00:39:31.560><c> what</c><00:39:32.560><c> they,</c><00:39:33.320><c> lawmakers,</c><00:39:34.040><c> {question</c>

00:39:34.190 --> 00:39:34.200 align:start position:0%
combat what they, lawmakers, {question
 

00:39:34.200 --> 00:39:35.550 align:start position:0%
combat what they, lawmakers, {question
mark}<00:39:34.600><c> prosecutors,</c><00:39:35.120><c> {question</c><00:39:35.360><c> mark}</c>

00:39:35.550 --> 00:39:35.560 align:start position:0%
mark} prosecutors, {question mark}
 

00:39:35.560 --> 00:39:37.750 align:start position:0%
mark} prosecutors, {question mark}
judges,<00:39:35.880><c> {question</c><00:39:36.120><c> mark}</c><00:39:36.640><c> perceived</c><00:39:37.440><c> as</c>

00:39:37.750 --> 00:39:37.760 align:start position:0%
judges, {question mark} perceived as
 

00:39:37.760 --> 00:39:40.630 align:start position:0%
judges, {question mark} perceived as
false<00:39:38.120><c> alibis.</c><00:39:39.120><c> Not</c><00:39:39.480><c> really</c><00:39:39.680><c> any</c><00:39:40.200><c> empirical</c>

00:39:40.630 --> 00:39:40.640 align:start position:0%
false alibis. Not really any empirical
 

00:39:40.640 --> 00:39:42.030 align:start position:0%
false alibis. Not really any empirical
evidence<00:39:40.960><c> to</c><00:39:41.040><c> support</c><00:39:41.400><c> that</c><00:39:41.680><c> was</c><00:39:41.800><c> such</c><00:39:42.000><c> a</c>

00:39:42.030 --> 00:39:42.040 align:start position:0%
evidence to support that was such a
 

00:39:42.040 --> 00:39:45.310 align:start position:0%
evidence to support that was such a
widespread<00:39:42.600><c> problem.</c><00:39:43.480><c> The</c><00:39:44.080><c> decline</c><00:39:44.960><c> in</c><00:39:45.200><c> the</c>

00:39:45.310 --> 00:39:45.320 align:start position:0%
widespread problem. The decline in the
 

00:39:45.320 --> 00:39:47.070 align:start position:0%
widespread problem. The decline in the
use<00:39:45.520><c> of</c><00:39:45.600><c> alibis</c><00:39:45.960><c> after</c><00:39:46.280><c> they</c><00:39:46.400><c> were</c><00:39:46.520><c> like,</c><00:39:46.760><c> "Oh,</c>

00:39:47.070 --> 00:39:47.080 align:start position:0%
use of alibis after they were like, "Oh,
 

00:39:47.080 --> 00:39:50.390 align:start position:0%
use of alibis after they were like, "Oh,
we<00:39:47.200><c> did</c><00:39:47.360><c> it,</c><00:39:47.440><c> guys.</c><00:39:47.840><c> We</c><00:39:47.960><c> got</c><00:39:48.240><c> them."</c><00:39:49.240><c> We</c><00:39:49.560><c> we</c>

00:39:50.390 --> 00:39:50.400 align:start position:0%
we did it, guys. We got them." We we
 

00:39:50.400 --> 00:39:52.030 align:start position:0%
we did it, guys. We got them." We we
fished<00:39:50.840><c> out,</c><00:39:51.040><c> we</c><00:39:51.160><c> weeded</c><00:39:51.520><c> out</c><00:39:51.640><c> all</c><00:39:51.720><c> the</c><00:39:51.800><c> false</c>

00:39:52.030 --> 00:39:52.040 align:start position:0%
fished out, we weeded out all the false
 

00:39:52.040 --> 00:39:55.190 align:start position:0%
fished out, we weeded out all the false
alibi<00:39:52.320><c> people.</c><00:39:53.280><c> No,</c><00:39:54.160><c> you</c><00:39:54.280><c> just</c><00:39:54.520><c> made</c><00:39:54.760><c> it</c><00:39:54.920><c> much</c>

00:39:55.190 --> 00:39:55.200 align:start position:0%
alibi people. No, you just made it much
 

00:39:55.200 --> 00:39:57.470 align:start position:0%
alibi people. No, you just made it much
harder<00:39:56.040><c> for</c><00:39:56.280><c> a</c><00:39:56.360><c> witness</c><00:39:56.640><c> to</c><00:39:56.800><c> want</c><00:39:57.160><c> to</c><00:39:57.280><c> come</c>

00:39:57.470 --> 00:39:57.480 align:start position:0%
harder for a witness to want to come
 

00:39:57.480 --> 00:39:59.150 align:start position:0%
harder for a witness to want to come
forward<00:39:58.040><c> because</c><00:39:58.320><c> they're</c><00:39:58.520><c> going</c><00:39:58.720><c> to</c><00:39:58.800><c> be</c>

00:39:59.150 --> 00:39:59.160 align:start position:0%
forward because they're going to be
 

00:39:59.160 --> 00:40:01.070 align:start position:0%
forward because they're going to be
interrogated<00:40:00.040><c> and</c><00:40:00.200><c> intimidated</c><00:40:00.800><c> by</c><00:40:00.960><c> the</c>

00:40:01.070 --> 00:40:01.080 align:start position:0%
interrogated and intimidated by the
 

00:40:01.080 --> 00:40:02.550 align:start position:0%
interrogated and intimidated by the
police<00:40:01.560><c> beforehand,</c><00:40:02.040><c> for</c><00:40:02.160><c> sure.</c><00:40:02.360><c> Like,</c>

00:40:02.550 --> 00:40:02.560 align:start position:0%
police beforehand, for sure. Like,
 

00:40:02.560 --> 00:40:04.190 align:start position:0%
police beforehand, for sure. Like,
here's<00:40:02.920><c> all</c><00:40:03.120><c> of</c><00:40:03.200><c> the</c><00:40:03.320><c> full</c><00:40:03.560><c> name,</c><00:40:03.920><c> full</c>

00:40:04.190 --> 00:40:04.200 align:start position:0%
here's all of the full name, full
 

00:40:04.200 --> 00:40:05.910 align:start position:0%
here's all of the full name, full
government<00:40:04.680><c> names</c><00:40:05.000><c> and</c><00:40:05.080><c> addresses</c><00:40:05.520><c> of</c><00:40:05.640><c> all</c><00:40:05.840><c> of</c>

00:40:05.910 --> 00:40:05.920 align:start position:0%
government names and addresses of all of
 

00:40:05.920 --> 00:40:08.550 align:start position:0%
government names and addresses of all of
the<00:40:06.480><c> alibi</c><00:40:06.760><c> witnesses</c><00:40:07.120><c> we</c><00:40:07.360><c> plan</c><00:40:07.560><c> to</c><00:40:07.640><c> call.</c>

00:40:08.550 --> 00:40:08.560 align:start position:0%
the alibi witnesses we plan to call.
 

00:40:08.560 --> 00:40:10.750 align:start position:0%
the alibi witnesses we plan to call.
Have<00:40:08.840><c> at</c><00:40:09.000><c> it,</c><00:40:09.160><c> right?</c><00:40:09.720><c> Which,</c><00:40:10.200><c> you</c><00:40:10.280><c> know,</c><00:40:10.640><c> I</c>

00:40:10.750 --> 00:40:10.760 align:start position:0%
Have at it, right? Which, you know, I
 

00:40:10.760 --> 00:40:13.350 align:start position:0%
Have at it, right? Which, you know, I
don't<00:40:11.000><c> think</c><00:40:11.360><c> I</c><00:40:11.480><c> I</c><00:40:11.560><c> think</c><00:40:11.760><c> is</c><00:40:11.880><c> not</c><00:40:12.000><c> a</c><00:40:12.040><c> bad</c><00:40:12.400><c> rule,</c>

00:40:13.350 --> 00:40:13.360 align:start position:0%
don't think I I think is not a bad rule,
 

00:40:13.360 --> 00:40:16.070 align:start position:0%
don't think I I think is not a bad rule,
but<00:40:13.560><c> the</c><00:40:13.680><c> way</c><00:40:13.880><c> that</c><00:40:14.000><c> it's</c><00:40:14.160><c> been</c><00:40:14.360><c> used</c><00:40:15.600><c> to</c><00:40:15.840><c> kind</c>

00:40:16.070 --> 00:40:16.080 align:start position:0%
but the way that it's been used to kind
 

00:40:16.080 --> 00:40:17.950 align:start position:0%
but the way that it's been used to kind
of<00:40:16.200><c> say,</c><00:40:16.440><c> "Oh,</c><00:40:16.640><c> look,</c><00:40:17.000><c> we've</c><00:40:17.240><c> prevented</c><00:40:17.640><c> false</c>

00:40:17.950 --> 00:40:17.960 align:start position:0%
of say, "Oh, look, we've prevented false
 

00:40:17.960 --> 00:40:20.270 align:start position:0%
of say, "Oh, look, we've prevented false
alibis.<00:40:18.320><c> It's</c><00:40:18.440><c> just</c><00:40:18.800><c> It's</c><00:40:19.000><c> just</c>

00:40:20.270 --> 00:40:20.280 align:start position:0%
alibis. It's just It's just
 

00:40:20.280 --> 00:40:22.630 align:start position:0%
alibis. It's just It's just
coconuts,<00:40:21.360><c> in</c><00:40:21.480><c> my</c><00:40:21.600><c> opinion."</c><00:40:22.040><c> Prosecutorial</c>

00:40:22.630 --> 00:40:22.640 align:start position:0%
coconuts, in my opinion." Prosecutorial
 

00:40:22.640 --> 00:40:24.590 align:start position:0%
coconuts, in my opinion." Prosecutorial
misconduct<00:40:23.600><c> and</c><00:40:23.880><c> witness</c><00:40:24.160><c> tampering,</c>

00:40:24.590 --> 00:40:24.600 align:start position:0%
misconduct and witness tampering,
 

00:40:24.600 --> 00:40:26.470 align:start position:0%
misconduct and witness tampering,
witness<00:40:24.840><c> intimidation,</c><00:40:26.000><c> intimidation</c>

00:40:26.470 --> 00:40:26.480 align:start position:0%
witness intimidation, intimidation
 

00:40:26.480 --> 00:40:30.110 align:start position:0%
witness intimidation, intimidation
period,<00:40:27.200><c> undue</c><00:40:27.720><c> duress</c><00:40:28.520><c> being</c><00:40:29.200><c> placed</c><00:40:29.800><c> on</c>

00:40:30.110 --> 00:40:30.120 align:start position:0%
period, undue duress being placed on
 

00:40:30.120 --> 00:40:32.990 align:start position:0%
period, undue duress being placed on
witnesses,<00:40:30.600><c> on</c><00:40:30.760><c> defendants,</c><00:40:31.240><c> on</c><00:40:31.800><c> suspects</c><00:40:32.720><c> is</c>

00:40:32.990 --> 00:40:33.000 align:start position:0%
witnesses, on defendants, on suspects is
 

00:40:33.000 --> 00:40:35.750 align:start position:0%
witnesses, on defendants, on suspects is
not<00:40:33.400><c> new</c><00:40:34.200><c> and</c><00:40:34.360><c> also</c><00:40:34.640><c> has</c><00:40:34.800><c> never</c><00:40:35.080><c> stopped.</c>

00:40:35.750 --> 00:40:35.760 align:start position:0%
not new and also has never stopped.
 

00:40:35.760 --> 00:40:37.710 align:start position:0%
not new and also has never stopped.
That's<00:40:36.040><c> a</c><00:40:36.120><c> fact.</c><00:40:36.680><c> For</c><00:40:36.840><c> example,</c><00:40:37.280><c> a</c><00:40:37.320><c> law</c><00:40:37.520><c> review</c>

00:40:37.710 --> 00:40:37.720 align:start position:0%
That's a fact. For example, a law review
 

00:40:37.720 --> 00:40:40.830 align:start position:0%
That's a fact. For example, a law review
article<00:40:38.320><c> in</c><00:40:38.800><c> 2014</c><00:40:39.880><c> called</c><00:40:40.200><c> Prosecutorial</c>

00:40:40.830 --> 00:40:40.840 align:start position:0%
article in 2014 called Prosecutorial
 

00:40:40.840 --> 00:40:43.310 align:start position:0%
article in 2014 called Prosecutorial
Misconduct<00:40:41.360><c> in</c><00:40:41.440><c> the</c><00:40:41.480><c> Digital</c><00:40:41.840><c> Age</c><00:40:42.600><c> cited</c><00:40:43.240><c> a</c>

00:40:43.310 --> 00:40:43.320 align:start position:0%
Misconduct in the Digital Age cited a
 

00:40:43.320 --> 00:40:46.070 align:start position:0%
Misconduct in the Digital Age cited a
case<00:40:43.840><c> in</c><00:40:44.000><c> which</c><00:40:44.240><c> a</c><00:40:44.320><c> prosecutor</c><00:40:45.320><c> created</c><00:40:45.960><c> a</c>

00:40:46.070 --> 00:40:46.080 align:start position:0%
case in which a prosecutor created a
 

00:40:46.080 --> 00:40:49.350 align:start position:0%
case in which a prosecutor created a
false<00:40:46.920><c> social</c><00:40:47.320><c> media</c><00:40:47.640><c> identity</c><00:40:48.680><c> and</c><00:40:48.840><c> engaged</c>

00:40:49.350 --> 00:40:49.360 align:start position:0%
false social media identity and engaged
 

00:40:49.360 --> 00:40:50.950 align:start position:0%
false social media identity and engaged
in<00:40:49.520><c> social</c><00:40:49.800><c> media</c><00:40:50.080><c> chats</c><00:40:50.440><c> with</c><00:40:50.640><c> alibi</c>

00:40:50.950 --> 00:40:50.960 align:start position:0%
in social media chats with alibi
 

00:40:50.960 --> 00:40:54.030 align:start position:0%
in social media chats with alibi
witnesses<00:40:51.400><c> to</c><00:40:51.560><c> persuade</c><00:40:52.360><c> them</c><00:40:52.640><c> to</c><00:40:52.880><c> recant</c>

00:40:54.030 --> 00:40:54.040 align:start position:0%
witnesses to persuade them to recant
 

00:40:54.040 --> 00:40:56.350 align:start position:0%
witnesses to persuade them to recant
their<00:40:54.320><c> alibi.</c>

00:40:56.350 --> 00:40:56.360 align:start position:0%
their alibi.
 

00:40:56.360 --> 00:40:59.110 align:start position:0%
their alibi.
What?<00:40:57.120><c> The</c><00:40:57.200><c> reality</c><00:40:57.920><c> that</c><00:40:58.120><c> it</c><00:40:58.240><c> is</c><00:40:58.400><c> much</c><00:40:58.640><c> easier</c>

00:40:59.110 --> 00:40:59.120 align:start position:0%
What? The reality that it is much easier
 

00:40:59.120 --> 00:41:00.910 align:start position:0%
What? The reality that it is much easier
for<00:40:59.320><c> an</c><00:40:59.400><c> alibi</c><00:40:59.760><c> witness</c><00:41:00.120><c> to</c><00:41:00.440><c> recant</c><00:41:00.800><c> their</c>

00:41:00.910 --> 00:41:00.920 align:start position:0%
for an alibi witness to recant their
 

00:41:00.920 --> 00:41:02.950 align:start position:0%
for an alibi witness to recant their
testimony,<00:41:01.560><c> to</c><00:41:01.840><c> be</c><00:41:01.960><c> inconsistent</c><00:41:02.680><c> with</c><00:41:02.800><c> their</c>

00:41:02.950 --> 00:41:02.960 align:start position:0%
testimony, to be inconsistent with their
 

00:41:02.960 --> 00:41:06.190 align:start position:0%
testimony, to be inconsistent with their
testimony,<00:41:03.880><c> to</c><00:41:04.520><c> really</c><00:41:05.240><c> get</c><00:41:05.520><c> out</c><00:41:05.760><c> of</c><00:41:06.000><c> being</c>

00:41:06.190 --> 00:41:06.200 align:start position:0%
testimony, to really get out of being
 

00:41:06.200 --> 00:41:08.310 align:start position:0%
testimony, to really get out of being
helpful<00:41:06.480><c> to</c><00:41:06.560><c> the</c><00:41:06.600><c> defendant</c><00:41:06.960><c> at</c><00:41:07.120><c> all</c><00:41:07.560><c> without</c>

00:41:08.310 --> 00:41:08.320 align:start position:0%
helpful to the defendant at all without
 

00:41:08.320 --> 00:41:12.190 align:start position:0%
helpful to the defendant at all without
really<00:41:08.600><c> trying</c><00:41:09.560><c> is</c><00:41:10.280><c> even</c><00:41:10.680><c> more</c><00:41:11.120><c> damning</c><00:41:11.760><c> when</c>

00:41:12.190 --> 00:41:12.200 align:start position:0%
really trying is even more damning when
 

00:41:12.200 --> 00:41:14.670 align:start position:0%
really trying is even more damning when
you<00:41:12.400><c> consider</c><00:41:13.040><c> that</c><00:41:13.720><c> the</c><00:41:13.960><c> {quote}</c>

00:41:14.670 --> 00:41:14.680 align:start position:0%
you consider that the {quote}
 

00:41:14.680 --> 00:41:18.110 align:start position:0%
you consider that the {quote}
strongest<00:41:15.960><c> alibi</c><00:41:16.800><c> that</c><00:41:17.000><c> you</c><00:41:17.080><c> can</c><00:41:17.240><c> put</c><00:41:17.440><c> on</c><00:41:17.800><c> that</c>

00:41:18.110 --> 00:41:18.120 align:start position:0%
strongest alibi that you can put on that
 

00:41:18.120 --> 00:41:20.590 align:start position:0%
strongest alibi that you can put on that
isn't<00:41:18.480><c> supported</c><00:41:18.920><c> by</c><00:41:19.040><c> physical</c><00:41:19.400><c> evidence</c><00:41:20.320><c> is</c>

00:41:20.590 --> 00:41:20.600 align:start position:0%
isn't supported by physical evidence is
 

00:41:20.600 --> 00:41:22.910 align:start position:0%
isn't supported by physical evidence is
going<00:41:20.880><c> to</c><00:41:20.960><c> be</c><00:41:21.080><c> supported</c><00:41:22.040><c> by</c><00:41:22.200><c> testimony</c><00:41:22.720><c> from</c>

00:41:22.910 --> 00:41:22.920 align:start position:0%
going to be supported by testimony from
 

00:41:22.920 --> 00:41:26.910 align:start position:0%
going to be supported by testimony from
a<00:41:23.040><c> stranger,</c><00:41:24.200><c> right?</c><00:41:25.000><c> Because,</c><00:41:25.880><c> as</c><00:41:26.120><c> shown</c><00:41:26.760><c> in</c>

00:41:26.910 --> 00:41:26.920 align:start position:0%
a stranger, right? Because, as shown in
 

00:41:26.920 --> 00:41:29.870 align:start position:0%
a stranger, right? Because, as shown in
one<00:41:27.120><c> study,</c><00:41:27.560><c> 62%</c><00:41:29.000><c> of</c><00:41:29.160><c> jury-eligible</c>

00:41:29.870 --> 00:41:29.880 align:start position:0%
one study, 62% of jury-eligible
 

00:41:29.880 --> 00:41:31.990 align:start position:0%
one study, 62% of jury-eligible
participants<00:41:30.400><c> felt</c><00:41:30.680><c> a</c><00:41:30.760><c> biologically</c><00:41:31.520><c> related</c>

00:41:31.990 --> 00:41:32.000 align:start position:0%
participants felt a biologically related
 

00:41:32.000 --> 00:41:33.790 align:start position:0%
participants felt a biologically related
alibi<00:41:32.480><c> witness</c><00:41:32.880><c> would</c><00:41:33.040><c> be</c><00:41:33.160><c> most</c><00:41:33.440><c> likely</c><00:41:33.680><c> to</c>

00:41:33.790 --> 00:41:33.800 align:start position:0%
alibi witness would be most likely to
 

00:41:33.800 --> 00:41:36.190 align:start position:0%
alibi witness would be most likely to
lie<00:41:33.960><c> for</c><00:41:34.160><c> a</c><00:41:34.200><c> defendant.</c><00:41:35.080><c> 50%</c><00:41:35.800><c> felt</c><00:41:35.960><c> the</c><00:41:36.000><c> same</c>

00:41:36.190 --> 00:41:36.200 align:start position:0%
lie for a defendant. 50% felt the same
 

00:41:36.200 --> 00:41:37.430 align:start position:0%
lie for a defendant. 50% felt the same
about<00:41:36.400><c> someone</c><00:41:36.600><c> related</c><00:41:36.840><c> by</c><00:41:36.960><c> marriage</c><00:41:37.320><c> and</c>

00:41:37.430 --> 00:41:37.440 align:start position:0%
about someone related by marriage and
 

00:41:37.440 --> 00:41:39.190 align:start position:0%
about someone related by marriage and
32%<00:41:38.080><c> felt</c><00:41:38.200><c> the</c><00:41:38.280><c> same</c><00:41:38.440><c> about</c><00:41:38.640><c> witnesses</c>

00:41:39.190 --> 00:41:39.200 align:start position:0%
32% felt the same about witnesses
 

00:41:39.200 --> 00:41:42.670 align:start position:0%
32% felt the same about witnesses
socially<00:41:40.320><c> related</c><00:41:40.720><c> to</c><00:41:40.800><c> the</c><00:41:40.960><c> defendant.</c><00:41:42.080><c> So,</c>

00:41:42.670 --> 00:41:42.680 align:start position:0%
socially related to the defendant. So,
 

00:41:42.680 --> 00:41:45.430 align:start position:0%
socially related to the defendant. So,
the<00:41:42.800><c> strongest</c><00:41:43.240><c> alibi,</c><00:41:43.800><c> right,</c><00:41:44.120><c> completely</c>

00:41:45.430 --> 00:41:45.440 align:start position:0%
the strongest alibi, right, completely
 

00:41:45.440 --> 00:41:47.550 align:start position:0%
the strongest alibi, right, completely
supported<00:41:45.840><c> by</c><00:41:46.000><c> just</c><00:41:46.960><c> testimony,</c>

00:41:47.550 --> 00:41:47.560 align:start position:0%
supported by just testimony,
 

00:41:47.560 --> 00:41:49.030 align:start position:0%
supported by just testimony,
circumstantial<00:41:48.040><c> evidence,</c><00:41:48.360><c> and</c><00:41:48.480><c> not</c><00:41:48.800><c> from</c>

00:41:49.030 --> 00:41:49.040 align:start position:0%
circumstantial evidence, and not from
 

00:41:49.040 --> 00:41:50.110 align:start position:0%
circumstantial evidence, and not from
physical<00:41:49.320><c> evidence</c><00:41:49.600><c> like,</c><00:41:49.800><c> you</c><00:41:49.880><c> know,</c><00:41:50.040><c> a</c>

00:41:50.110 --> 00:41:50.120 align:start position:0%
physical evidence like, you know, a
 

00:41:50.120 --> 00:41:51.790 align:start position:0%
physical evidence like, you know, a
video<00:41:50.440><c> camera,</c><00:41:51.040><c> security</c><00:41:51.360><c> tape,</c><00:41:51.600><c> anything</c>

00:41:51.790 --> 00:41:51.800 align:start position:0%
video camera, security tape, anything
 

00:41:51.800 --> 00:41:56.550 align:start position:0%
video camera, security tape, anything
like<00:41:51.920><c> that,</c><00:41:52.720><c> is</c><00:41:53.120><c> is</c><00:41:53.280><c> still</c><00:41:54.280><c> weak</c><00:41:55.240><c> because</c><00:41:56.480><c> a</c>

00:41:56.550 --> 00:41:56.560 align:start position:0%
like that, is is still weak because a
 

00:41:56.560 --> 00:41:59.270 align:start position:0%
like that, is is still weak because a
stranger<00:41:57.720><c> is</c><00:41:58.000><c> so</c><00:41:58.240><c> much</c><00:41:58.520><c> more</c><00:41:58.720><c> likely</c><00:41:59.120><c> to</c>

00:41:59.270 --> 00:41:59.280 align:start position:0%
stranger is so much more likely to
 

00:41:59.280 --> 00:42:01.550 align:start position:0%
stranger is so much more likely to
recant<00:41:59.760><c> their</c><00:41:59.880><c> witness</c><00:42:00.160><c> testimony,</c><00:42:00.920><c> to</c><00:42:01.080><c> say,</c>

00:42:01.550 --> 00:42:01.560 align:start position:0%
recant their witness testimony, to say,
 

00:42:01.560 --> 00:42:04.030 align:start position:0%
recant their witness testimony, to say,
"Yeah,<00:42:01.840><c> I'm</c><00:42:02.000><c> out,"</c><00:42:02.640><c> or</c><00:42:02.960><c> to</c><00:42:03.160><c> not</c><00:42:03.560><c> be</c><00:42:03.800><c> as</c>

00:42:04.030 --> 00:42:04.040 align:start position:0%
"Yeah, I'm out," or to not be as
 

00:42:04.040 --> 00:42:05.590 align:start position:0%
"Yeah, I'm out," or to not be as
committed<00:42:04.560><c> to</c><00:42:04.640><c> keeping</c><00:42:04.920><c> their</c><00:42:05.080><c> statements</c>

00:42:05.590 --> 00:42:05.600 align:start position:0%
committed to keeping their statements
 

00:42:05.600 --> 00:42:10.950 align:start position:0%
committed to keeping their statements
consistent.<00:42:06.400><c> They</c><00:42:06.640><c> are</c><00:42:07.600><c> more</c><00:42:08.040><c> ripe</c><00:42:08.680><c> to</c><00:42:09.800><c> sway</c>

00:42:10.950 --> 00:42:10.960 align:start position:0%
consistent. They are more ripe to sway
 

00:42:10.960 --> 00:42:15.990 align:start position:0%
consistent. They are more ripe to sway
to<00:42:11.560><c> intimidation</c><00:42:12.280><c> or</c><00:42:12.480><c> to</c><00:42:13.280><c> misleading</c><00:42:14.720><c> the</c>

00:42:15.990 --> 00:42:16.000 align:start position:0%
to intimidation or to misleading the
 

00:42:16.000 --> 00:42:18.230 align:start position:0%
to intimidation or to misleading the
questions,<00:42:17.040><c> right?</c><00:42:17.480><c> Or</c><00:42:17.640><c> to</c><00:42:17.760><c> questions</c><00:42:18.080><c> just</c>

00:42:18.230 --> 00:42:18.240 align:start position:0%
questions, right? Or to questions just
 

00:42:18.240 --> 00:42:20.390 align:start position:0%
questions, right? Or to questions just
poking<00:42:18.600><c> holes</c><00:42:19.520><c> in</c><00:42:19.640><c> their</c><00:42:19.760><c> story.</c><00:42:20.120><c> They're</c>

00:42:20.390 --> 00:42:20.400 align:start position:0%
poking holes in their story. They're
 

00:42:20.400 --> 00:42:22.190 align:start position:0%
poking holes in their story. They're
they<00:42:20.760><c> they</c><00:42:21.200><c> feel</c><00:42:21.640><c> as</c><00:42:21.800><c> though</c><00:42:21.920><c> they</c><00:42:22.040><c> don't</c>

00:42:22.190 --> 00:42:22.200 align:start position:0%
they they feel as though they don't
 

00:42:22.200 --> 00:42:23.830 align:start position:0%
they they feel as though they don't
really<00:42:22.360><c> have</c><00:42:22.480><c> a</c><00:42:23.000><c> a</c><00:42:23.040><c> lot</c><00:42:23.280><c> of</c><00:42:23.360><c> skin</c><00:42:23.600><c> in</c><00:42:23.680><c> this</c>

00:42:23.830 --> 00:42:23.840 align:start position:0%
really have a a lot of skin in this
 

00:42:23.840 --> 00:42:27.030 align:start position:0%
really have a a lot of skin in this
game,<00:42:24.720><c> and</c><00:42:25.120><c> that</c>

00:42:27.030 --> 00:42:27.040 align:start position:0%
game, and that
 

00:42:27.040 --> 00:42:29.590 align:start position:0%
game, and that
is<00:42:27.200><c> the</c><00:42:27.280><c> catch-22,</c><00:42:28.160><c> right?</c><00:42:28.840><c> Yay,</c><00:42:29.240><c> we</c><00:42:29.360><c> found</c><00:42:29.560><c> a</c>

00:42:29.590 --> 00:42:29.600 align:start position:0%
is the catch-22, right? Yay, we found a
 

00:42:29.600 --> 00:42:31.230 align:start position:0%
is the catch-22, right? Yay, we found a
complete<00:42:29.920><c> stranger</c><00:42:30.240><c> who</c><00:42:30.400><c> 100%</c><00:42:30.960><c> supports</c><00:42:31.160><c> your</c>

00:42:31.230 --> 00:42:31.240 align:start position:0%
complete stranger who 100% supports your
 

00:42:31.240 --> 00:42:32.710 align:start position:0%
complete stranger who 100% supports your
alibi<00:42:31.520><c> and</c><00:42:31.600><c> definitely</c><00:42:31.920><c> remembers</c><00:42:32.320><c> you.</c><00:42:32.520><c> Now,</c>

00:42:32.710 --> 00:42:32.720 align:start position:0%
alibi and definitely remembers you. Now,
 

00:42:32.720 --> 00:42:34.670 align:start position:0%
alibi and definitely remembers you. Now,
let's<00:42:32.960><c> pray</c><00:42:33.600><c> that</c><00:42:33.920><c> nothing</c><00:42:34.240><c> happens</c><00:42:34.600><c> in</c>

00:42:34.670 --> 00:42:34.680 align:start position:0%
let's pray that nothing happens in
 

00:42:34.680 --> 00:42:36.710 align:start position:0%
let's pray that nothing happens in
between<00:42:35.160><c> now</c><00:42:35.560><c> and</c><00:42:35.760><c> when</c><00:42:35.880><c> they</c><00:42:36.000><c> testify</c><00:42:36.520><c> that</c>

00:42:36.710 --> 00:42:36.720 align:start position:0%
between now and when they testify that
 

00:42:36.720 --> 00:42:38.310 align:start position:0%
between now and when they testify that
would<00:42:36.840><c> somehow</c><00:42:37.280><c> transform</c><00:42:37.840><c> them</c><00:42:38.040><c> from</c><00:42:38.240><c> a</c>

00:42:38.310 --> 00:42:38.320 align:start position:0%
would somehow transform them from a
 

00:42:38.320 --> 00:42:39.790 align:start position:0%
would somehow transform them from a
super<00:42:38.680><c> helpful</c><00:42:39.040><c> witness</c><00:42:39.360><c> to</c><00:42:39.520><c> one</c><00:42:39.640><c> that</c>

00:42:39.790 --> 00:42:39.800 align:start position:0%
super helpful witness to one that
 

00:42:39.800 --> 00:42:43.070 align:start position:0%
super helpful witness to one that
actually<00:42:40.480><c> hurts</c><00:42:40.960><c> your</c><00:42:41.400><c> case.</c><00:42:42.120><c> Unfortunately,</c>

00:42:43.070 --> 00:42:43.080 align:start position:0%
actually hurts your case. Unfortunately,
 

00:42:43.080 --> 00:42:44.790 align:start position:0%
actually hurts your case. Unfortunately,
truthful<00:42:43.520><c> witnesses</c><00:42:44.120><c> are</c><00:42:44.240><c> more</c><00:42:44.440><c> likely</c><00:42:44.720><c> to</c>

00:42:44.790 --> 00:42:44.800 align:start position:0%
truthful witnesses are more likely to
 

00:42:44.800 --> 00:42:46.910 align:start position:0%
truthful witnesses are more likely to
retract<00:42:45.240><c> an</c><00:42:45.360><c> accurate</c><00:42:45.720><c> alibi</c><00:42:46.160><c> if</c><00:42:46.320><c> exposed</c><00:42:46.840><c> to</c>

00:42:46.910 --> 00:42:46.920 align:start position:0%
retract an accurate alibi if exposed to
 

00:42:46.920 --> 00:42:48.870 align:start position:0%
retract an accurate alibi if exposed to
incriminating<00:42:47.440><c> evidence,</c><00:42:47.840><c> which</c><00:42:48.000><c> is</c><00:42:48.400><c> also</c>

00:42:48.870 --> 00:42:48.880 align:start position:0%
incriminating evidence, which is also
 

00:42:48.880 --> 00:42:51.830 align:start position:0%
incriminating evidence, which is also
such<00:42:49.320><c> a</c><00:42:49.440><c> bummer.</c><00:42:50.120><c> It</c><00:42:50.280><c> is</c><00:42:50.440><c> extremely</c><00:42:51.040><c> hard</c><00:42:51.520><c> for</c>

00:42:51.830 --> 00:42:51.840 align:start position:0%
such a bummer. It is extremely hard for
 

00:42:51.840 --> 00:42:53.990 align:start position:0%
such a bummer. It is extremely hard for
you,<00:42:52.480><c> for</c><00:42:52.800><c> anyone,</c>

00:42:53.990 --> 00:42:54.000 align:start position:0%
you, for anyone,
 

00:42:54.000 --> 00:42:55.830 align:start position:0%
you, for anyone,
to<00:42:54.160><c> separate</c><00:42:54.600><c> an</c><00:42:54.720><c> alibi</c><00:42:55.080><c> provided</c><00:42:55.480><c> in</c><00:42:55.600><c> good</c>

00:42:55.830 --> 00:42:55.840 align:start position:0%
to separate an alibi provided in good
 

00:42:55.840 --> 00:42:58.870 align:start position:0%
to separate an alibi provided in good
faith<00:42:56.720><c> from</c><00:42:56.960><c> a</c><00:42:57.040><c> lie,</c><00:42:57.600><c> period.</c><00:42:58.120><c> You</c><00:42:58.320><c> do</c><00:42:58.520><c> not</c>

00:42:58.870 --> 00:42:58.880 align:start position:0%
faith from a lie, period. You do not
 

00:42:58.880 --> 00:43:01.590 align:start position:0%
faith from a lie, period. You do not
have,<00:42:59.480><c> especially</c><00:43:00.280><c> cops,</c><00:43:00.760><c> do</c><00:43:00.920><c> not</c><00:43:01.160><c> have</c><00:43:01.400><c> some</c>

00:43:01.590 --> 00:43:01.600 align:start position:0%
have, especially cops, do not have some
 

00:43:01.600 --> 00:43:03.790 align:start position:0%
have, especially cops, do not have some
heightened<00:43:02.080><c> sense</c><00:43:02.320><c> and</c><00:43:02.440><c> ability</c><00:43:03.240><c> to</c><00:43:03.400><c> tell</c><00:43:03.680><c> if</c>

00:43:03.790 --> 00:43:03.800 align:start position:0%
heightened sense and ability to tell if
 

00:43:03.800 --> 00:43:06.990 align:start position:0%
heightened sense and ability to tell if
someone's<00:43:04.160><c> lying.</c><00:43:04.720><c> You</c><00:43:05.040><c> have</c><00:43:05.360><c> no</c><00:43:05.680><c> idea.</c><00:43:06.720><c> The</c>

00:43:06.990 --> 00:43:07.000 align:start position:0%
someone's lying. You have no idea. The
 

00:43:07.000 --> 00:43:10.430 align:start position:0%
someone's lying. You have no idea. The
evidence<00:43:07.400><c> does</c><00:43:07.640><c> not</c><00:43:07.840><c> support</c><00:43:09.160><c> that</c><00:43:10.040><c> there</c><00:43:10.280><c> is</c>

00:43:10.430 --> 00:43:10.440 align:start position:0%
evidence does not support that there is
 

00:43:10.440 --> 00:43:13.190 align:start position:0%
evidence does not support that there is
some<00:43:10.680><c> kind</c><00:43:10.920><c> of</c><00:43:11.040><c> pattern</c><00:43:11.520><c> you</c><00:43:11.640><c> can</c><00:43:11.840><c> follow</c><00:43:12.880><c> that</c>

00:43:13.190 --> 00:43:13.200 align:start position:0%
some kind of pattern you can follow that
 

00:43:13.200 --> 00:43:15.750 align:start position:0%
some kind of pattern you can follow that
would<00:43:13.880><c> coincide</c><00:43:14.640><c> with</c><00:43:14.840><c> you</c><00:43:14.960><c> knowing</c><00:43:15.360><c> more</c><00:43:15.640><c> or</c>

00:43:15.750 --> 00:43:15.760 align:start position:0%
would coincide with you knowing more or
 

00:43:15.760 --> 00:43:17.830 align:start position:0%
would coincide with you knowing more or
being<00:43:16.000><c> able</c><00:43:16.200><c> to</c><00:43:16.320><c> suss</c><00:43:16.680><c> out</c><00:43:16.840><c> a</c><00:43:16.880><c> lie.</c><00:43:17.600><c> It's</c>

00:43:17.830 --> 00:43:17.840 align:start position:0%
being able to suss out a lie. It's
 

00:43:17.840 --> 00:43:19.390 align:start position:0%
being able to suss out a lie. It's
completely

00:43:19.390 --> 00:43:19.400 align:start position:0%
completely
 

00:43:19.400 --> 00:43:21.630 align:start position:0%
completely
subjective,<00:43:20.320><c> honestly,</c><00:43:20.920><c> and</c><00:43:21.040><c> extremely</c>

00:43:21.630 --> 00:43:21.640 align:start position:0%
subjective, honestly, and extremely
 

00:43:21.640 --> 00:43:23.910 align:start position:0%
subjective, honestly, and extremely
difficult<00:43:22.160><c> because</c><00:43:22.520><c> so</c><00:43:22.760><c> many</c><00:43:23.000><c> get</c><00:43:23.160><c> it</c><00:43:23.280><c> wrong.</c>

00:43:23.910 --> 00:43:23.920 align:start position:0%
difficult because so many get it wrong.
 

00:43:23.920 --> 00:43:26.190 align:start position:0%
difficult because so many get it wrong.
So<00:43:24.120><c> many</c><00:43:24.280><c> get</c><00:43:24.400><c> it</c><00:43:24.520><c> wrong.</c><00:43:24.920><c> Study</c><00:43:25.280><c> after</c><00:43:25.600><c> study</c>

00:43:26.190 --> 00:43:26.200 align:start position:0%
So many get it wrong. Study after study
 

00:43:26.200 --> 00:43:28.310 align:start position:0%
So many get it wrong. Study after study
shows<00:43:26.880><c> that</c><00:43:27.000><c> people</c><00:43:27.360><c> are</c><00:43:27.480><c> not</c><00:43:27.800><c> good</c><00:43:28.080><c> at</c>

00:43:28.310 --> 00:43:28.320 align:start position:0%
shows that people are not good at
 

00:43:28.320 --> 00:43:30.350 align:start position:0%
shows that people are not good at
accurately<00:43:28.800><c> assessing</c><00:43:29.240><c> deceit.</c><00:43:30.040><c> In</c><00:43:30.160><c> most</c>

00:43:30.350 --> 00:43:30.360 align:start position:0%
accurately assessing deceit. In most
 

00:43:30.360 --> 00:43:32.870 align:start position:0%
accurately assessing deceit. In most
cases,<00:43:30.960><c> investigators</c><00:43:31.600><c> and</c><00:43:32.000><c> jurors</c><00:43:32.600><c> would</c><00:43:32.760><c> be</c>

00:43:32.870 --> 00:43:32.880 align:start position:0%
cases, investigators and jurors would be
 

00:43:32.880 --> 00:43:35.030 align:start position:0%
cases, investigators and jurors would be
just<00:43:33.120><c> as</c><00:43:33.280><c> accurate</c><00:43:33.760><c> if</c><00:43:33.840><c> they</c><00:43:33.960><c> flipped</c><00:43:34.320><c> a</c><00:43:34.400><c> coin.</c>

00:43:35.030 --> 00:43:35.040 align:start position:0%
just as accurate if they flipped a coin.
 

00:43:35.040 --> 00:43:37.150 align:start position:0%
just as accurate if they flipped a coin.
This<00:43:35.240><c> makes</c><00:43:35.440><c> it</c><00:43:35.560><c> hard</c><00:43:35.840><c> for</c><00:43:35.960><c> investigators</c><00:43:36.840><c> and</c>

00:43:37.150 --> 00:43:37.160 align:start position:0%
This makes it hard for investigators and
 

00:43:37.160 --> 00:43:40.070 align:start position:0%
This makes it hard for investigators and
jurors<00:43:37.680><c> to</c><00:43:38.160><c> assess</c><00:43:38.880><c> an</c><00:43:38.960><c> alibi</c><00:43:39.240><c> witness,</c><00:43:39.960><c> and</c>

00:43:40.070 --> 00:43:40.080 align:start position:0%
jurors to assess an alibi witness, and
 

00:43:40.080 --> 00:43:42.110 align:start position:0%
jurors to assess an alibi witness, and
the<00:43:40.160><c> studies</c><00:43:40.840><c> prove</c><00:43:41.200><c> it.</c><00:43:41.640><c> The</c><00:43:41.760><c> DNA</c>

00:43:42.110 --> 00:43:42.120 align:start position:0%
the studies prove it. The DNA
 

00:43:42.120 --> 00:43:44.430 align:start position:0%
the studies prove it. The DNA
exoneration<00:43:42.800><c> cases</c><00:43:43.240><c> suggest</c><00:43:44.120><c> that</c><00:43:44.200><c> there</c><00:43:44.320><c> is</c>

00:43:44.430 --> 00:43:44.440 align:start position:0%
exoneration cases suggest that there is
 

00:43:44.440 --> 00:43:46.750 align:start position:0%
exoneration cases suggest that there is
a<00:43:44.480><c> systemic</c><00:43:45.080><c> bias</c><00:43:45.680><c> in</c><00:43:45.840><c> our</c><00:43:45.920><c> justice</c><00:43:46.280><c> system</c>

00:43:46.750 --> 00:43:46.760 align:start position:0%
a systemic bias in our justice system
 

00:43:46.760 --> 00:43:48.710 align:start position:0%
a systemic bias in our justice system
against<00:43:47.360><c> alibis</c><00:43:47.840><c> provided</c><00:43:48.200><c> by</c><00:43:48.360><c> innocent</c>

00:43:48.710 --> 00:43:48.720 align:start position:0%
against alibis provided by innocent
 

00:43:48.720 --> 00:43:51.230 align:start position:0%
against alibis provided by innocent
suspects,<00:43:49.560><c> which</c><00:43:49.800><c> breaks</c><00:43:50.120><c> my</c><00:43:50.240><c> damn</c><00:43:50.560><c> heart.</c><00:43:51.080><c> In</c>

00:43:51.230 --> 00:43:51.240 align:start position:0%
suspects, which breaks my damn heart. In
 

00:43:51.240 --> 00:43:54.430 align:start position:0%
suspects, which breaks my damn heart. In
sum,<00:43:51.880><c> the</c><00:43:52.040><c> myth</c><00:43:52.280><c> of</c><00:43:52.360><c> the</c><00:43:52.520><c> alibi</c><00:43:53.080><c> may</c><00:43:53.400><c> be</c><00:43:54.040><c> more</c>

00:43:54.430 --> 00:43:54.440 align:start position:0%
sum, the myth of the alibi may be more
 

00:43:54.440 --> 00:43:56.750 align:start position:0%
sum, the myth of the alibi may be more
verifiably<00:43:55.200><c> true</c><00:43:55.680><c> than</c><00:43:56.240><c> merely</c><00:43:56.640><c> an</c>

00:43:56.750 --> 00:43:56.760 align:start position:0%
verifiably true than merely an
 

00:43:56.760 --> 00:43:58.550 align:start position:0%
verifiably true than merely an
unsupported<00:43:57.320><c> assumption.</c><00:43:57.960><c> The</c><00:43:58.080><c> research</c><00:43:58.440><c> and</c>

00:43:58.550 --> 00:43:58.560 align:start position:0%
unsupported assumption. The research and
 

00:43:58.560 --> 00:44:00.870 align:start position:0%
unsupported assumption. The research and
data<00:43:58.840><c> suggest</c><00:43:59.400><c> anything</c><00:43:59.960><c> but</c><00:44:00.120><c> a</c><00:44:00.200><c> perfect</c>

00:44:00.870 --> 00:44:00.880 align:start position:0%
data suggest anything but a perfect
 

00:44:00.880 --> 00:44:02.870 align:start position:0%
data suggest anything but a perfect
physical<00:44:01.280><c> evidence-supported</c><00:44:02.040><c> alibi</c><00:44:02.440><c> risks</c>

00:44:02.870 --> 00:44:02.880 align:start position:0%
physical evidence-supported alibi risks
 

00:44:02.880 --> 00:44:04.710 align:start position:0%
physical evidence-supported alibi risks
an<00:44:02.960><c> entire</c><00:44:03.320><c> defense</c><00:44:03.800><c> being</c><00:44:04.080><c> turned</c><00:44:04.440><c> on</c><00:44:04.560><c> its</c>

00:44:04.710 --> 00:44:04.720 align:start position:0%
an entire defense being turned on its
 

00:44:04.720 --> 00:44:06.550 align:start position:0%
an entire defense being turned on its
head.<00:44:05.120><c> On</c><00:44:05.200><c> the</c><00:44:05.320><c> other</c><00:44:05.520><c> hand,</c><00:44:06.000><c> the</c><00:44:06.080><c> specific</c>

00:44:06.550 --> 00:44:06.560 align:start position:0%
head. On the other hand, the specific
 

00:44:06.560 --> 00:44:08.790 align:start position:0%
head. On the other hand, the specific
facts<00:44:07.160><c> of</c><00:44:07.360><c> each</c><00:44:07.560><c> case</c><00:44:07.920><c> and</c><00:44:08.080><c> the</c><00:44:08.160><c> specific</c>

00:44:08.790 --> 00:44:08.800 align:start position:0%
facts of each case and the specific
 

00:44:08.800 --> 00:44:10.230 align:start position:0%
facts of each case and the specific
alibi<00:44:09.080><c> witnesses,</c><00:44:09.560><c> their</c><00:44:09.720><c> credibility,</c>

00:44:10.230 --> 00:44:10.240 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses, their credibility,
 

00:44:10.240 --> 00:44:11.430 align:start position:0%
alibi witnesses, their credibility,
their<00:44:10.400><c> relationship</c><00:44:10.800><c> to</c><00:44:10.880><c> the</c><00:44:10.960><c> defendant,</c><00:44:11.320><c> how</c>

00:44:11.430 --> 00:44:11.440 align:start position:0%
their relationship to the defendant, how
 

00:44:11.440 --> 00:44:12.910 align:start position:0%
their relationship to the defendant, how
the<00:44:11.560><c> police</c><00:44:11.760><c> investigate,</c><00:44:12.320><c> how</c><00:44:12.440><c> strong</c><00:44:12.840><c> the</c>

00:44:12.910 --> 00:44:12.920 align:start position:0%
the police investigate, how strong the
 

00:44:12.920 --> 00:44:14.550 align:start position:0%
the police investigate, how strong the
prosecution's<00:44:13.560><c> case</c><00:44:13.840><c> is</c><00:44:14.040><c> to</c><00:44:14.120><c> begin</c><00:44:14.400><c> with,</c>

00:44:14.550 --> 00:44:14.560 align:start position:0%
prosecution's case is to begin with,
 

00:44:14.560 --> 00:44:17.190 align:start position:0%
prosecution's case is to begin with,
etc.<00:44:15.320><c> are</c><00:44:15.520><c> all</c><00:44:15.680><c> variables</c><00:44:16.440><c> that</c><00:44:16.600><c> make</c><00:44:16.840><c> a</c><00:44:16.960><c> hard</c>

00:44:17.190 --> 00:44:17.200 align:start position:0%
etc. are all variables that make a hard
 

00:44:17.200 --> 00:44:19.910 align:start position:0%
etc. are all variables that make a hard
and<00:44:17.320><c> fast</c><00:44:17.920><c> never</c><00:44:18.240><c> present</c><00:44:18.600><c> an</c><00:44:18.720><c> alibi</c><00:44:19.160><c> rule</c>

00:44:19.910 --> 00:44:19.920 align:start position:0%
and fast never present an alibi rule
 

00:44:19.920 --> 00:44:22.750 align:start position:0%
and fast never present an alibi rule
impossible<00:44:20.920><c> to</c><00:44:21.120><c> support.</c><00:44:21.760><c> My</c><00:44:21.880><c> rebuttal</c><00:44:22.600><c> for</c>

00:44:22.750 --> 00:44:22.760 align:start position:0%
impossible to support. My rebuttal for
 

00:44:22.760 --> 00:44:24.950 align:start position:0%
impossible to support. My rebuttal for
today's<00:44:23.040><c> episode</c><00:44:23.720><c> is</c><00:44:24.040><c> not</c><00:44:24.360><c> that</c><00:44:24.520><c> alibis</c>

00:44:24.950 --> 00:44:24.960 align:start position:0%
today's episode is not that alibis
 

00:44:24.960 --> 00:44:27.150 align:start position:0%
today's episode is not that alibis
shouldn't<00:44:25.280><c> be</c><00:44:25.440><c> used</c><00:44:25.840><c> ever.</c><00:44:26.320><c> It's</c><00:44:26.520><c> not</c><00:44:27.000><c> that</c>

00:44:27.150 --> 00:44:27.160 align:start position:0%
shouldn't be used ever. It's not that
 

00:44:27.160 --> 00:44:28.990 align:start position:0%
shouldn't be used ever. It's not that
you<00:44:27.240><c> should</c><00:44:27.400><c> be</c><00:44:27.480><c> terrified</c><00:44:28.200><c> each</c><00:44:28.440><c> day</c><00:44:28.840><c> of</c>

00:44:28.990 --> 00:44:29.000 align:start position:0%
you should be terrified each day of
 

00:44:29.000 --> 00:44:31.430 align:start position:0%
you should be terrified each day of
misremembering<00:44:30.000><c> the</c><00:44:30.440><c> mundane</c><00:44:30.840><c> events</c><00:44:31.320><c> of</c>

00:44:31.430 --> 00:44:31.440 align:start position:0%
misremembering the mundane events of
 

00:44:31.440 --> 00:44:33.550 align:start position:0%
misremembering the mundane events of
your<00:44:31.640><c> daily</c><00:44:32.040><c> lives</c><00:44:32.600><c> should</c><00:44:32.760><c> they</c><00:44:32.840><c> become</c><00:44:33.440><c> a</c>

00:44:33.550 --> 00:44:33.560 align:start position:0%
your daily lives should they become a
 

00:44:33.560 --> 00:44:35.350 align:start position:0%
your daily lives should they become a
life<00:44:33.920><c> or</c><00:44:34.040><c> death</c><00:44:34.600><c> recollection</c><00:44:35.200><c> in</c><00:44:35.320><c> a</c>

00:44:35.350 --> 00:44:35.360 align:start position:0%
life or death recollection in a
 

00:44:35.360 --> 00:44:37.230 align:start position:0%
life or death recollection in a
courtroom<00:44:35.760><c> one</c><00:44:35.920><c> day.</c><00:44:36.240><c> The</c><00:44:36.400><c> point</c><00:44:36.960><c> of</c><00:44:37.080><c> this</c>

00:44:37.230 --> 00:44:37.240 align:start position:0%
courtroom one day. The point of this
 

00:44:37.240 --> 00:44:39.870 align:start position:0%
courtroom one day. The point of this
episode<00:44:37.920><c> is</c><00:44:38.200><c> to,</c><00:44:38.440><c> as</c><00:44:38.640><c> always,</c><00:44:39.160><c> expand</c><00:44:39.720><c> your</c>

00:44:39.870 --> 00:44:39.880 align:start position:0%
episode is to, as always, expand your
 

00:44:39.880 --> 00:44:41.830 align:start position:0%
episode is to, as always, expand your
knowledge<00:44:40.360><c> of</c><00:44:40.800><c> and</c><00:44:40.960><c> appreciation</c><00:44:41.560><c> for</c><00:44:41.720><c> the</c>

00:44:41.830 --> 00:44:41.840 align:start position:0%
knowledge of and appreciation for the
 

00:44:41.840 --> 00:44:44.110 align:start position:0%
knowledge of and appreciation for the
legal<00:44:42.080><c> system,</c><00:44:42.920><c> its</c><00:44:43.080><c> limitations,</c><00:44:43.920><c> its</c>

00:44:44.110 --> 00:44:44.120 align:start position:0%
legal system, its limitations, its
 

00:44:44.120 --> 00:44:46.110 align:start position:0%
legal system, its limitations, its
biases,<00:44:44.920><c> its,</c><00:44:45.120><c> of</c><00:44:45.240><c> course,</c><00:44:45.440><c> humorous</c><00:44:45.880><c> and</c>

00:44:46.110 --> 00:44:46.120 align:start position:0%
biases, its, of course, humorous and
 

00:44:46.120 --> 00:44:47.790 align:start position:0%
biases, its, of course, humorous and
outlandish<00:44:46.560><c> events,</c><00:44:47.040><c> which</c><00:44:47.360><c> not</c><00:44:47.600><c> so</c><00:44:47.680><c> much</c>

00:44:47.790 --> 00:44:47.800 align:start position:0%
outlandish events, which not so much
 

00:44:47.800 --> 00:44:49.350 align:start position:0%
outlandish events, which not so much
this<00:44:47.960><c> episode,</c><00:44:48.320><c> but</c><00:44:48.480><c> many</c><00:44:48.760><c> others</c><00:44:49.040><c> that</c><00:44:49.160><c> we've</c>

00:44:49.350 --> 00:44:49.360 align:start position:0%
this episode, but many others that we've
 

00:44:49.360 --> 00:44:52.270 align:start position:0%
this episode, but many others that we've
done,<00:44:49.760><c> okay?</c><00:44:50.080><c> Less</c><00:44:50.360><c> serious,</c><00:44:51.280><c> less</c><00:44:51.560><c> learning,</c>

00:44:52.270 --> 00:44:52.280 align:start position:0%
done, okay? Less serious, less learning,
 

00:44:52.280 --> 00:44:56.430 align:start position:0%
done, okay? Less serious, less learning,
more<00:44:52.520><c> hee-hee-ha-ha-ing,</c><00:44:53.880><c> but</c><00:44:54.360><c> this</c><00:44:54.600><c> one</c><00:44:55.200><c> I</c>

00:44:56.430 --> 00:44:56.440 align:start position:0%
more hee-hee-ha-ha-ing, but this one I
 

00:44:56.440 --> 00:44:59.070 align:start position:0%
more hee-hee-ha-ha-ing, but this one I
I<00:44:56.560><c> hope</c><00:44:56.800><c> that</c><00:44:57.280><c> you</c><00:44:57.440><c> can</c><00:44:57.640><c> take</c><00:44:57.880><c> away</c><00:44:58.240><c> from</c><00:44:58.680><c> it</c>

00:44:59.070 --> 00:44:59.080 align:start position:0%
I hope that you can take away from it
 

00:44:59.080 --> 00:45:02.030 align:start position:0%
I hope that you can take away from it
this<00:44:59.320><c> system's</c><00:45:00.200><c> complexities.</c><00:45:01.240><c> Nothing</c><00:45:01.880><c> is</c>

00:45:02.030 --> 00:45:02.040 align:start position:0%
this system's complexities. Nothing is
 

00:45:02.040 --> 00:45:04.470 align:start position:0%
this system's complexities. Nothing is
black<00:45:02.280><c> and</c><00:45:02.360><c> white.</c><00:45:03.000><c> We</c><00:45:03.160><c> live</c><00:45:03.800><c> in</c><00:45:03.880><c> the</c><00:45:04.000><c> gray,</c><00:45:04.320><c> we</c>

00:45:04.470 --> 00:45:04.480 align:start position:0%
black and white. We live in the gray, we
 

00:45:04.480 --> 00:45:06.230 align:start position:0%
black and white. We live in the gray, we
litigate<00:45:05.200><c> in</c><00:45:05.360><c> the</c><00:45:05.440><c> gray,</c><00:45:06.000><c> and</c><00:45:06.160><c> your</c>

00:45:06.230 --> 00:45:06.240 align:start position:0%
litigate in the gray, and your
 

00:45:06.240 --> 00:45:07.630 align:start position:0%
litigate in the gray, and your
determinations<00:45:06.920><c> or</c><00:45:07.000><c> assumptions</c><00:45:07.480><c> about</c>

00:45:07.630 --> 00:45:07.640 align:start position:0%
determinations or assumptions about
 

00:45:07.640 --> 00:45:09.190 align:start position:0%
determinations or assumptions about
another<00:45:07.840><c> person's</c><00:45:08.160><c> guilt</c><00:45:08.480><c> or</c><00:45:08.640><c> innocence,</c><00:45:09.080><c> if</c>

00:45:09.190 --> 00:45:09.200 align:start position:0%
another person's guilt or innocence, if
 

00:45:09.200 --> 00:45:11.430 align:start position:0%
another person's guilt or innocence, if
you<00:45:09.320><c> ever</c><00:45:09.640><c> sit</c><00:45:10.280><c> on</c><00:45:10.440><c> a</c><00:45:10.480><c> jury</c><00:45:10.920><c> in</c><00:45:11.000><c> a</c><00:45:11.080><c> criminal</c>

00:45:11.430 --> 00:45:11.440 align:start position:0%
you ever sit on a jury in a criminal
 

00:45:11.440 --> 00:45:13.750 align:start position:0%
you ever sit on a jury in a criminal
case,<00:45:12.040><c> a</c><00:45:12.120><c> trial</c><00:45:12.640><c> one</c><00:45:12.840><c> day,</c><00:45:13.320><c> maybe</c><00:45:13.560><c> you're</c><00:45:13.720><c> a</c>

00:45:13.750 --> 00:45:13.760 align:start position:0%
case, a trial one day, maybe you're a
 

00:45:13.760 --> 00:45:14.710 align:start position:0%
case, a trial one day, maybe you're a
witness<00:45:14.080><c> one</c><00:45:14.240><c> day,</c><00:45:14.400><c> maybe</c><00:45:14.560><c> you're</c><00:45:14.680><c> a</c>

00:45:14.710 --> 00:45:14.720 align:start position:0%
witness one day, maybe you're a
 

00:45:14.720 --> 00:45:16.910 align:start position:0%
witness one day, maybe you're a
defendant,<00:45:15.520><c> God</c><00:45:15.760><c> forbid,</c><00:45:16.320><c> should</c><00:45:16.520><c> take</c><00:45:16.800><c> all</c>

00:45:16.910 --> 00:45:16.920 align:start position:0%
defendant, God forbid, should take all
 

00:45:16.920 --> 00:45:19.230 align:start position:0%
defendant, God forbid, should take all
of<00:45:17.000><c> this</c><00:45:17.120><c> into</c><00:45:17.320><c> account.</c><00:45:17.880><c> And</c><00:45:18.160><c> God</c><00:45:18.400><c> forbid,</c>

00:45:19.230 --> 00:45:19.240 align:start position:0%
of this into account. And God forbid,
 

00:45:19.240 --> 00:45:21.590 align:start position:0%
of this into account. And God forbid,
bigger<00:45:19.560><c> rebuttal</c><00:45:19.920><c> capital</c><00:45:20.480><c> r</c><00:45:20.720><c> e</c><00:45:20.840><c> b,</c><00:45:21.360><c> if</c><00:45:21.520><c> you</c>

00:45:21.590 --> 00:45:21.600 align:start position:0%
bigger rebuttal capital r e b, if you
 

00:45:21.600 --> 00:45:23.110 align:start position:0%
bigger rebuttal capital r e b, if you
are<00:45:21.720><c> ever</c><00:45:21.920><c> questioned</c><00:45:22.280><c> by</c><00:45:22.400><c> the</c><00:45:22.520><c> police,</c>

00:45:23.110 --> 00:45:23.120 align:start position:0%
are ever questioned by the police,
 

00:45:23.120 --> 00:45:25.710 align:start position:0%
are ever questioned by the police,
arrested<00:45:23.600><c> or</c><00:45:23.680><c> not,</c><00:45:24.000><c> innocent</c><00:45:24.440><c> or</c><00:45:24.560><c> not,</c><00:45:25.480><c> you</c>

00:45:25.710 --> 00:45:25.720 align:start position:0%
arrested or not, innocent or not, you
 

00:45:25.720 --> 00:45:28.190 align:start position:0%
arrested or not, innocent or not, you
say<00:45:25.960><c> no,</c><00:45:26.520><c> I</c><00:45:26.680><c> want</c><00:45:26.920><c> a</c><00:45:27.000><c> lawyer.</c><00:45:27.720><c> I</c><00:45:27.840><c> will</c><00:45:28.000><c> not</c>

00:45:28.190 --> 00:45:28.200 align:start position:0%
say no, I want a lawyer. I will not
 

00:45:28.200 --> 00:45:30.150 align:start position:0%
say no, I want a lawyer. I will not
speak<00:45:28.480><c> to</c><00:45:28.600><c> you</c><00:45:28.680><c> without</c><00:45:28.920><c> a</c><00:45:29.000><c> lawyer.</c><00:45:29.800><c> I</c><00:45:29.960><c> am</c>

00:45:30.150 --> 00:45:30.160 align:start position:0%
speak to you without a lawyer. I am
 

00:45:30.160 --> 00:45:32.230 align:start position:0%
speak to you without a lawyer. I am
exercising<00:45:30.680><c> my</c><00:45:30.800><c> right</c><00:45:31.000><c> to</c><00:45:31.080><c> remain</c><00:45:31.400><c> silent,</c>

00:45:32.230 --> 00:45:32.240 align:start position:0%
exercising my right to remain silent,
 

00:45:32.240 --> 00:45:34.910 align:start position:0%
exercising my right to remain silent,
and<00:45:32.440><c> then</c><00:45:32.600><c> you</c><00:45:32.800><c> do</c><00:45:33.040><c> so.</c><00:45:33.560><c> You</c><00:45:33.840><c> shut</c><00:45:34.120><c> your</c><00:45:34.240><c> mouth.</c>

00:45:34.910 --> 00:45:34.920 align:start position:0%
and then you do so. You shut your mouth.
 

00:45:34.920 --> 00:45:38.590 align:start position:0%
and then you do so. You shut your mouth.
Shut<00:45:35.280><c> it.</c><00:45:36.040><c> Shut</c><00:45:36.520><c> up.</c><00:45:36.800><c> In</c><00:45:37.040><c> order</c><00:45:37.280><c> to</c><00:45:38.200><c> have</c><00:45:38.480><c> the</c>

00:45:38.590 --> 00:45:38.600 align:start position:0%
Shut it. Shut up. In order to have the
 

00:45:38.600 --> 00:45:39.590 align:start position:0%
Shut it. Shut up. In order to have the
right<00:45:38.800><c> to</c><00:45:38.880><c> remain</c><00:45:39.080><c> silent,</c><00:45:39.280><c> you</c><00:45:39.360><c> have</c><00:45:39.480><c> to</c>

00:45:39.590 --> 00:45:39.600 align:start position:0%
right to remain silent, you have to
 

00:45:39.600 --> 00:45:41.270 align:start position:0%
right to remain silent, you have to
exercise<00:45:40.200><c> it.</c>

00:45:41.270 --> 00:45:41.280 align:start position:0%
exercise it.
 

00:45:41.280 --> 00:45:43.270 align:start position:0%
exercise it.
You<00:45:41.360><c> have</c><00:45:41.520><c> to</c><00:45:41.680><c> have</c><00:45:41.960><c> You</c><00:45:42.080><c> have</c><00:45:42.240><c> to</c><00:45:42.360><c> have</c><00:45:42.760><c> it,</c>

00:45:43.270 --> 00:45:43.280 align:start position:0%
You have to have You have to have it,
 

00:45:43.280 --> 00:45:46.830 align:start position:0%
You have to have You have to have it,
use<00:45:43.760><c> it.</c><00:45:44.640><c> Okay?</c><00:45:44.840><c> Use</c><00:45:45.080><c> it</c><00:45:45.200><c> by</c><00:45:45.360><c> shutting.</c>

00:45:46.830 --> 00:45:46.840 align:start position:0%
use it. Okay? Use it by shutting.
 

00:45:46.840 --> 00:45:49.310 align:start position:0%
use it. Okay? Use it by shutting.
Shutting.<00:45:47.720><c> Right</c><00:45:48.160><c> after</c><00:45:48.480><c> you</c><00:45:48.720><c> say</c><00:45:48.960><c> I</c><00:45:49.040><c> want</c><00:45:49.280><c> a</c>

00:45:49.310 --> 00:45:49.320 align:start position:0%
Shutting. Right after you say I want a
 

00:45:49.320 --> 00:45:51.310 align:start position:0%
Shutting. Right after you say I want a
lawyer<00:45:49.640><c> clearly,</c><00:45:50.120><c> unequivocally,</c><00:45:50.880><c> do</c><00:45:51.080><c> not</c>

00:45:51.310 --> 00:45:51.320 align:start position:0%
lawyer clearly, unequivocally, do not
 

00:45:51.320 --> 00:45:52.870 align:start position:0%
lawyer clearly, unequivocally, do not
say<00:45:51.480><c> anything</c><00:45:51.920><c> ambiguous.</c><00:45:52.400><c> Say</c><00:45:52.560><c> I</c><00:45:52.640><c> want</c><00:45:52.800><c> a</c>

00:45:52.870 --> 00:45:52.880 align:start position:0%
say anything ambiguous. Say I want a
 

00:45:52.880 --> 00:45:54.270 align:start position:0%
say anything ambiguous. Say I want a
lawyer,<00:45:53.080><c> period.</c>

00:45:54.270 --> 00:45:54.280 align:start position:0%
lawyer, period.
 

00:45:54.280 --> 00:45:55.310 align:start position:0%
lawyer, period.
That<00:45:54.400><c> is</c><00:45:54.520><c> a</c><00:45:54.560><c> sentence,</c><00:45:54.920><c> full</c><00:45:55.040><c> sentence,</c>

00:45:55.310 --> 00:45:55.320 align:start position:0%
That is a sentence, full sentence,
 

00:45:55.320 --> 00:45:56.670 align:start position:0%
That is a sentence, full sentence,
period,<00:45:55.600><c> stop.</c><00:45:55.960><c> And</c><00:45:56.080><c> that</c><00:45:56.240><c> gives</c><00:45:56.480><c> you</c><00:45:56.560><c> the</c>

00:45:56.670 --> 00:45:56.680 align:start position:0%
period, stop. And that gives you the
 

00:45:56.680 --> 00:45:59.230 align:start position:0%
period, stop. And that gives you the
chance<00:45:57.240><c> to</c><00:45:57.360><c> have</c><00:45:57.560><c> your</c><00:45:57.800><c> defense</c><00:45:58.360><c> attorney</c>

00:45:59.230 --> 00:45:59.240 align:start position:0%
chance to have your defense attorney
 

00:45:59.240 --> 00:46:01.710 align:start position:0%
chance to have your defense attorney
help<00:45:59.520><c> you</c><00:45:59.600><c> decide</c><00:46:00.360><c> whether</c><00:46:00.800><c> an</c><00:46:00.920><c> alibi</c><00:46:01.480><c> you</c>

00:46:01.710 --> 00:46:01.720 align:start position:0%
help you decide whether an alibi you
 

00:46:01.720 --> 00:46:03.590 align:start position:0%
help you decide whether an alibi you
were<00:46:01.880><c> totally</c><00:46:02.240><c> about</c><00:46:02.520><c> to</c><00:46:02.640><c> blab</c><00:46:03.000><c> to</c><00:46:03.120><c> the</c><00:46:03.200><c> police</c>

00:46:03.590 --> 00:46:03.600 align:start position:0%
were totally about to blab to the police
 

00:46:03.600 --> 00:46:05.990 align:start position:0%
were totally about to blab to the police
all<00:46:03.880><c> about</c><00:46:04.440><c> is</c><00:46:04.680><c> as</c><00:46:04.800><c> airtight</c><00:46:05.360><c> and</c><00:46:05.520><c> helpful</c><00:46:05.840><c> as</c>

00:46:05.990 --> 00:46:06.000 align:start position:0%
all about is as airtight and helpful as
 

00:46:06.000 --> 00:46:07.430 align:start position:0%
all about is as airtight and helpful as
you<00:46:06.080><c> thought</c><00:46:06.320><c> it</c><00:46:06.440><c> was.</c><00:46:07.000><c> Thank</c><00:46:07.240><c> you</c><00:46:07.320><c> for</c>

00:46:07.430 --> 00:46:07.440 align:start position:0%
you thought it was. Thank you for
 

00:46:07.440 --> 00:46:08.830 align:start position:0%
you thought it was. Thank you for
watching.<00:46:07.920><c> Thank</c><00:46:08.120><c> you</c><00:46:08.200><c> for</c><00:46:08.320><c> listening.</c><00:46:08.760><c> I</c>

00:46:08.830 --> 00:46:08.840 align:start position:0%
watching. Thank you for listening. I
 

00:46:08.840 --> 00:46:09.990 align:start position:0%
watching. Thank you for listening. I
hope<00:46:09.040><c> you</c><00:46:09.160><c> learned</c><00:46:09.480><c> a</c><00:46:09.520><c> little</c><00:46:09.720><c> something</c>

00:46:09.990 --> 00:46:10.000 align:start position:0%
hope you learned a little something
 

00:46:10.000 --> 00:46:12.030 align:start position:0%
hope you learned a little something
today.<00:46:10.560><c> Please</c><00:46:10.880><c> do</c><00:46:11.000><c> not</c><00:46:11.200><c> take</c><00:46:11.360><c> this</c><00:46:11.520><c> episode</c>

00:46:12.030 --> 00:46:12.040 align:start position:0%
today. Please do not take this episode
 

00:46:12.040 --> 00:46:13.950 align:start position:0%
today. Please do not take this episode
as<00:46:12.240><c> some</c><00:46:12.520><c> big</c><00:46:13.160><c> "Rab</c><00:46:13.440><c> said</c><00:46:13.600><c> that</c><00:46:13.720><c> I</c><00:46:13.800><c> should</c>

00:46:13.950 --> 00:46:13.960 align:start position:0%
as some big "Rab said that I should
 

00:46:13.960 --> 00:46:15.470 align:start position:0%
as some big "Rab said that I should
never<00:46:14.200><c> have</c><00:46:14.400><c> an</c><00:46:14.480><c> alibi</c><00:46:14.840><c> and</c><00:46:14.920><c> that</c><00:46:15.040><c> alibis</c><00:46:15.400><c> are</c>

00:46:15.470 --> 00:46:15.480 align:start position:0%
never have an alibi and that alibis are
 

00:46:15.480 --> 00:46:16.750 align:start position:0%
never have an alibi and that alibis are
really<00:46:15.680><c> stupid</c><00:46:15.920><c> to</c><00:46:15.960><c> put</c><00:46:16.120><c> on</c><00:46:16.240><c> as</c><00:46:16.360><c> evidence</c><00:46:16.640><c> in</c><00:46:16.720><c> a</c>

00:46:16.750 --> 00:46:16.760 align:start position:0%
really stupid to put on as evidence in a
 

00:46:16.760 --> 00:46:18.510 align:start position:0%
really stupid to put on as evidence in a
trial."<00:46:17.000><c> I</c><00:46:17.040><c> will</c><00:46:17.200><c> actually</c><00:46:17.920><c> I</c><00:46:18.040><c> will</c><00:46:18.200><c> hunt</c><00:46:18.440><c> you</c>

00:46:18.510 --> 00:46:18.520 align:start position:0%
trial." I will actually I will hunt you
 

00:46:18.520 --> 00:46:19.841 align:start position:0%
trial." I will actually I will hunt you
down,<00:46:18.960><c> okay?</c>

00:46:19.841 --> 00:46:19.851 align:start position:0%
down, okay?
 

00:46:19.851 --> 00:46:20.750 align:start position:0%
down, okay?
&gt;&gt; [laughter]

00:46:20.750 --> 00:46:20.760 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; [laughter]
 

00:46:20.760 --> 00:46:22.470 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; [laughter]
&gt;&gt; This<00:46:20.920><c> is</c><00:46:21.120><c> simply</c><00:46:21.480><c> information</c><00:46:22.040><c> I'm</c><00:46:22.120><c> providing</c>

00:46:22.470 --> 00:46:22.480 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; This is simply information I'm providing
 

00:46:22.480 --> 00:46:24.110 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; This is simply information I'm providing
to<00:46:22.640><c> you</c><00:46:22.960><c> and</c><00:46:23.280><c> something</c><00:46:23.680><c> that</c><00:46:23.880><c> defense</c>

00:46:24.110 --> 00:46:24.120 align:start position:0%
to you and something that defense
 

00:46:24.120 --> 00:46:25.390 align:start position:0%
to you and something that defense
attorneys<00:46:24.440><c> have</c><00:46:24.560><c> to</c><00:46:24.640><c> consider</c><00:46:25.080><c> and</c><00:46:25.200><c> think</c>

00:46:25.390 --> 00:46:25.400 align:start position:0%
attorneys have to consider and think
 

00:46:25.400 --> 00:46:27.470 align:start position:0%
attorneys have to consider and think
about<00:46:26.040><c> on</c><00:46:26.240><c> a</c><00:46:26.320><c> daily,</c><00:46:26.920><c> hourly,</c>

00:46:27.470 --> 00:46:27.480 align:start position:0%
about on a daily, hourly,
 

00:46:27.480 --> 00:46:30.430 align:start position:0%
about on a daily, hourly,
second-by-second<00:46:28.600><c> basis</c><00:46:29.760><c> that</c><00:46:30.160><c> I</c><00:46:30.240><c> don't</c>

00:46:30.430 --> 00:46:30.440 align:start position:0%
second-by-second basis that I don't
 

00:46:30.440 --> 00:46:32.390 align:start position:0%
second-by-second basis that I don't
think<00:46:30.600><c> the</c><00:46:30.680><c> general</c><00:46:30.960><c> public</c><00:46:31.880><c> understands</c><00:46:32.320><c> or</c>

00:46:32.390 --> 00:46:32.400 align:start position:0%
think the general public understands or
 

00:46:32.400 --> 00:46:33.750 align:start position:0%
think the general public understands or
appreciates<00:46:32.760><c> enough.</c><00:46:33.080><c> The</c><00:46:33.280><c> press</c><00:46:33.560><c> release</c>

00:46:33.750 --> 00:46:33.760 align:start position:0%
appreciates enough. The press release
 

00:46:33.760 --> 00:46:34.750 align:start position:0%
appreciates enough. The press release
announcement<00:46:34.120><c> that</c><00:46:34.200><c> I</c><00:46:34.240><c> mentioned</c><00:46:34.520><c> on</c><00:46:34.600><c> last</c>

00:46:34.750 --> 00:46:34.760 align:start position:0%
announcement that I mentioned on last
 

00:46:34.760 --> 00:46:36.350 align:start position:0%
announcement that I mentioned on last
week's<00:46:35.360><c> episode,</c>

00:46:36.350 --> 00:46:36.360 align:start position:0%
week's episode,
 

00:46:36.360 --> 00:46:37.830 align:start position:0%
week's episode,
it's<00:46:36.560><c> not</c><00:46:36.720><c> it's</c><00:46:36.840><c> not</c><00:46:36.960><c> up</c><00:46:37.040><c> to</c><00:46:37.120><c> me</c><00:46:37.560><c> like</c><00:46:37.720><c> when</c>

00:46:37.830 --> 00:46:37.840 align:start position:0%
it's not it's not up to me like when
 

00:46:37.840 --> 00:46:40.430 align:start position:0%
it's not it's not up to me like when
that<00:46:37.960><c> comes</c><00:46:38.200><c> out</c><00:46:38.360><c> because</c><00:46:38.640><c> it's</c><00:46:39.120><c> the</c><00:46:39.360><c> studio</c>

00:46:40.430 --> 00:46:40.440 align:start position:0%
that comes out because it's the studio
 

00:46:40.440 --> 00:46:43.150 align:start position:0%
that comes out because it's the studio
is<00:46:41.160><c> they</c><00:46:41.440><c> they</c><00:46:41.640><c> are</c><00:46:41.760><c> doing</c><00:46:42.040><c> it.</c><00:46:42.360><c> So,</c><00:46:42.520><c> I</c><00:46:42.600><c> have</c><00:46:42.800><c> no</c>

00:46:43.150 --> 00:46:43.160 align:start position:0%
is they they are doing it. So, I have no
 

00:46:43.160 --> 00:46:44.510 align:start position:0%
is they they are doing it. So, I have no
I<00:46:43.200><c> have</c><00:46:43.320><c> no</c><00:46:43.440><c> power</c><00:46:43.680><c> or</c><00:46:43.720><c> control,</c><00:46:44.200><c> which</c><00:46:44.360><c> is</c>

00:46:44.510 --> 00:46:44.520 align:start position:0%
I have no power or control, which is
 

00:46:44.520 --> 00:46:46.710 align:start position:0%
I have no power or control, which is
kind<00:46:44.640><c> of</c><00:46:44.720><c> nice</c><00:46:45.280><c> to</c><00:46:45.480><c> kind</c><00:46:45.680><c> of</c>

00:46:46.710 --> 00:46:46.720 align:start position:0%
kind of nice to kind of
 

00:46:46.720 --> 00:46:48.230 align:start position:0%
kind of nice to kind of
take<00:46:46.920><c> the</c><00:46:47.000><c> hands</c><00:46:47.160><c> off</c><00:46:47.280><c> the</c><00:46:47.360><c> wheel.</c><00:46:47.800><c> I</c><00:46:47.960><c> love</c><00:46:48.160><c> you</c>

00:46:48.230 --> 00:46:48.240 align:start position:0%
take the hands off the wheel. I love you
 

00:46:48.240 --> 00:46:50.350 align:start position:0%
take the hands off the wheel. I love you
guys<00:46:48.360><c> so</c><00:46:48.440><c> much.</c><00:46:48.640><c> I</c><00:46:48.680><c> hope</c><00:46:48.880><c> that</c><00:46:49.080><c> you</c><00:46:49.920><c> love</c><00:46:50.160><c> this</c>

00:46:50.350 --> 00:46:50.360 align:start position:0%
guys so much. I hope that you love this
 

00:46:50.360 --> 00:46:52.110 align:start position:0%
guys so much. I hope that you love this
podcast<00:46:50.880><c> and</c><00:46:51.040><c> my</c><00:46:51.200><c> content</c><00:46:51.720><c> and</c><00:46:52.000><c> our</c>

00:46:52.110 --> 00:46:52.120 align:start position:0%
podcast and my content and our
 

00:46:52.120 --> 00:46:53.750 align:start position:0%
podcast and my content and our
conversations.<00:46:52.880><c> I</c><00:46:52.920><c> feel</c><00:46:53.040><c> like</c><00:46:53.160><c> we</c><00:46:53.360><c> have</c><00:46:53.600><c> these</c>

00:46:53.750 --> 00:46:53.760 align:start position:0%
conversations. I feel like we have these
 

00:46:53.760 --> 00:46:55.270 align:start position:0%
conversations. I feel like we have these
conversations<00:46:54.160><c> in</c><00:46:54.200><c> the</c><00:46:54.280><c> comments.</c><00:46:54.800><c> I</c><00:46:54.920><c> don't</c>

00:46:55.270 --> 00:46:55.280 align:start position:0%
conversations in the comments. I don't
 

00:46:55.280 --> 00:46:56.390 align:start position:0%
conversations in the comments. I don't
ever<00:46:55.440><c> feel</c><00:46:55.560><c> like</c><00:46:55.680><c> it's</c><00:46:55.800><c> one-sided.</c><00:46:56.200><c> I</c><00:46:56.240><c> feel</c>

00:46:56.390 --> 00:46:56.400 align:start position:0%
ever feel like it's one-sided. I feel
 

00:46:56.400 --> 00:46:57.670 align:start position:0%
ever feel like it's one-sided. I feel
like<00:46:56.520><c> there's</c><00:46:56.640><c> such</c><00:46:56.880><c> dialogue.</c><00:46:57.360><c> I</c><00:46:57.400><c> hope</c><00:46:57.560><c> you</c>

00:46:57.670 --> 00:46:57.680 align:start position:0%
like there's such dialogue. I hope you
 

00:46:57.680 --> 00:47:00.590 align:start position:0%
like there's such dialogue. I hope you
enjoy<00:46:57.880><c> them</c><00:46:58.000><c> enough</c><00:46:58.360><c> to</c><00:46:58.840><c> hop</c><00:46:59.120><c> on</c><00:46:59.280><c> over</c><00:46:59.520><c> to</c><00:46:59.840><c> the</c>

00:47:00.590 --> 00:47:00.600 align:start position:0%
enjoy them enough to hop on over to the
 

00:47:00.600 --> 00:47:03.430 align:start position:0%
enjoy them enough to hop on over to the
forthcoming<00:47:01.680><c> new</c><00:47:02.000><c> show</c><00:47:02.440><c> that</c><00:47:02.680><c> I</c><00:47:02.840><c> will</c><00:47:03.080><c> be</c><00:47:03.240><c> on</c>

00:47:03.430 --> 00:47:03.440 align:start position:0%
forthcoming new show that I will be on
 

00:47:03.440 --> 00:47:05.110 align:start position:0%
forthcoming new show that I will be on
in<00:47:03.520><c> addition</c><00:47:03.800><c> to</c><00:47:03.880><c> Rebuttal,</c><00:47:04.240><c> of</c><00:47:04.320><c> course,</c>

00:47:05.110 --> 00:47:05.120 align:start position:0%
in addition to Rebuttal, of course,
 

00:47:05.120 --> 00:47:07.150 align:start position:0%
in addition to Rebuttal, of course,
never<00:47:05.760><c> leaving</c><00:47:06.120><c> my</c><00:47:06.400><c> OG,</c><00:47:06.720><c> my</c><00:47:06.840><c> love,</c><00:47:07.040><c> my</c>

00:47:07.150 --> 00:47:07.160 align:start position:0%
never leaving my OG, my love, my
 

00:47:07.160 --> 00:47:09.670 align:start position:0%
never leaving my OG, my love, my
romance,<00:47:08.160><c> my</c><00:47:08.280><c> baby.</c>

00:47:09.670 --> 00:47:09.680 align:start position:0%
romance, my baby.
 

00:47:09.680 --> 00:47:11.510 align:start position:0%
romance, my baby.
New<00:47:09.920><c> show</c><00:47:10.160><c> that</c><00:47:10.400><c> I'm</c><00:47:10.600><c> going</c><00:47:10.760><c> to</c><00:47:10.840><c> host</c><00:47:11.120><c> and</c><00:47:11.320><c> I'm</c>

00:47:11.510 --> 00:47:11.520 align:start position:0%
New show that I'm going to host and I'm
 

00:47:11.520 --> 00:47:12.470 align:start position:0%
New show that I'm going to host and I'm
really<00:47:11.760><c> really</c><00:47:11.960><c> really</c><00:47:12.120><c> really</c><00:47:12.280><c> really</c>

00:47:12.470 --> 00:47:12.480 align:start position:0%
really really really really really
 

00:47:12.480 --> 00:47:14.190 align:start position:0%
really really really really really
excited<00:47:12.720><c> about</c><00:47:12.880><c> it.</c><00:47:13.400><c> So,</c><00:47:13.840><c> love</c><00:47:13.960><c> you</c><00:47:14.000><c> guys</c><00:47:14.120><c> so</c>

00:47:14.190 --> 00:47:14.200 align:start position:0%
excited about it. So, love you guys so
 

00:47:14.200 --> 00:47:16.070 align:start position:0%
excited about it. So, love you guys so
much.<00:47:14.840><c> Blah</c><00:47:14.960><c> blah</c><00:47:15.080><c> blah</c><00:47:15.200><c> blah.</c>

00:47:16.070 --> 00:47:16.080 align:start position:0%
much. Blah blah blah blah.
 

00:47:16.080 --> 00:47:17.510 align:start position:0%
much. Blah blah blah blah.
I<00:47:16.120><c> don't</c><00:47:16.240><c> even</c><00:47:16.400><c> think</c><00:47:16.520><c> I'm</c><00:47:16.600><c> allowed</c><00:47:16.800><c> to</c><00:47:17.240><c> state</c>

00:47:17.510 --> 00:47:17.520 align:start position:0%
I don't even think I'm allowed to state
 

00:47:17.520 --> 00:47:19.230 align:start position:0%
I don't even think I'm allowed to state
the<00:47:17.600><c> title</c><00:47:18.160><c> yet.</c>

00:47:19.230 --> 00:47:19.240 align:start position:0%
the title yet.
 

00:47:19.240 --> 00:47:21.590 align:start position:0%
the title yet.
It's<00:47:19.400><c> funny.</c><00:47:19.680><c> I'm</c><00:47:19.920><c> I'm</c><00:47:20.040><c> an</c><00:47:20.080><c> attorney,</c><00:47:20.440><c> right?</c>

00:47:21.590 --> 00:47:21.600 align:start position:0%
It's funny. I'm I'm an attorney, right?
 

00:47:21.600 --> 00:47:23.750 align:start position:0%
It's funny. I'm I'm an attorney, right?
But<00:47:21.880><c> as</c><00:47:22.120><c> like</c><00:47:22.320><c> I</c><00:47:22.400><c> would</c><00:47:22.560><c> I</c><00:47:22.640><c> would</c><00:47:22.760><c> be</c><00:47:22.840><c> the</c><00:47:22.960><c> worst</c>

00:47:23.750 --> 00:47:23.760 align:start position:0%
But as like I would I would be the worst
 

00:47:23.760 --> 00:47:24.870 align:start position:0%
But as like I would I would be the worst
actor<00:47:24.080><c> actress.</c><00:47:24.440><c> You</c><00:47:24.480><c> know</c><00:47:24.600><c> how</c><00:47:24.640><c> they</c><00:47:24.720><c> have</c><00:47:24.840><c> to</c>

00:47:24.870 --> 00:47:24.880 align:start position:0%
actor actress. You know how they have to
 

00:47:24.880 --> 00:47:26.870 align:start position:0%
actor actress. You know how they have to
keep<00:47:25.040><c> everything</c><00:47:25.240><c> under</c><00:47:25.400><c> wraps.</c><00:47:25.960><c> Like</c><00:47:26.280><c> I'm</c>

00:47:26.870 --> 00:47:26.880 align:start position:0%
keep everything under wraps. Like I'm
 

00:47:26.880 --> 00:47:27.950 align:start position:0%
keep everything under wraps. Like I'm
I'm<00:47:27.040><c> like</c><00:47:27.280><c> there's</c><00:47:27.440><c> a</c><00:47:27.480><c> new</c><00:47:27.600><c> show</c><00:47:27.720><c> I'm</c><00:47:27.760><c> going</c><00:47:27.880><c> to</c>

00:47:27.950 --> 00:47:27.960 align:start position:0%
I'm like there's a new show I'm going to
 

00:47:27.960 --> 00:47:29.750 align:start position:0%
I'm like there's a new show I'm going to
host,<00:47:28.360><c> yippee.</c><00:47:28.800><c> They'll</c><00:47:28.960><c> probably</c><00:47:29.200><c> announce</c>

00:47:29.750 --> 00:47:29.760 align:start position:0%
host, yippee. They'll probably announce
 

00:47:29.760 --> 00:47:31.230 align:start position:0%
host, yippee. They'll probably announce
they'll<00:47:29.960><c> announce</c><00:47:30.160><c> the</c><00:47:30.280><c> actual</c><00:47:30.680><c> show</c><00:47:31.160><c> and</c>

00:47:31.230 --> 00:47:31.240 align:start position:0%
they'll announce the actual show and
 

00:47:31.240 --> 00:47:32.030 align:start position:0%
they'll announce the actual show and
there'll<00:47:31.360><c> be</c><00:47:31.440><c> a</c><00:47:31.480><c> whole</c><00:47:31.600><c> prep</c><00:47:31.800><c> like</c><00:47:31.920><c> there'll</c>

00:47:32.030 --> 00:47:32.040 align:start position:0%
there'll be a whole prep like there'll
 

00:47:32.040 --> 00:47:34.430 align:start position:0%
there'll be a whole prep like there'll
be<00:47:32.080><c> like</c><00:47:32.440><c> a</c><00:47:32.480><c> marketing</c><00:47:33.160><c> campaign</c><00:47:34.040><c> and</c><00:47:34.160><c> like</c><00:47:34.400><c> a</c>

00:47:34.430 --> 00:47:34.440 align:start position:0%
be like a marketing campaign and like a
 

00:47:34.440 --> 00:47:35.750 align:start position:0%
be like a marketing campaign and like a
whole<00:47:34.560><c> thing,</c><00:47:34.720><c> but</c><00:47:34.920><c> I</c><00:47:35.000><c> just</c><00:47:35.240><c> the</c><00:47:35.320><c> fact</c><00:47:35.600><c> that</c><00:47:35.720><c> I</c>

00:47:35.750 --> 00:47:35.760 align:start position:0%
whole thing, but I just the fact that I
 

00:47:35.760 --> 00:47:37.787 align:start position:0%
whole thing, but I just the fact that I
don't<00:47:36.000><c> have</c><00:47:36.160><c> to</c><00:47:36.280><c> like</c><00:47:36.560><c> run</c><00:47:36.800><c> that.</c>

00:47:37.787 --> 00:47:37.797 align:start position:0%
don't have to like run that.
 

00:47:37.797 --> 00:47:38.710 align:start position:0%
don't have to like run that.
&gt;&gt; [gasps and sighs]

00:47:38.710 --> 00:47:38.720 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; [gasps and sighs]
 

00:47:38.720 --> 00:47:41.270 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; [gasps and sighs]
&gt;&gt; I<00:47:38.800><c> love</c><00:47:39.040><c> that.</c><00:47:39.680><c> I</c><00:47:39.760><c> love</c><00:47:40.320><c> people</c><00:47:40.680><c> working</c><00:47:41.080><c> for</c>

00:47:41.270 --> 00:47:41.280 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; I love that. I love people working for
 

00:47:41.280 --> 00:47:43.910 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; I love that. I love people working for
Like<00:47:41.480><c> I</c><00:47:41.520><c> just</c><00:47:42.000><c> I</c><00:47:42.120><c> feel</c><00:47:42.560><c> as</c><00:47:42.720><c> though</c>

00:47:43.910 --> 00:47:43.920 align:start position:0%
Like I just I feel as though
 

00:47:43.920 --> 00:47:46.830 align:start position:0%
Like I just I feel as though
lawyers<00:47:44.400><c> get</c><00:47:44.600><c> it</c><00:47:45.240><c> even</c><00:47:45.480><c> having</c><00:47:45.680><c> paralegals</c><00:47:46.120><c> or</c>

00:47:46.830 --> 00:47:46.840 align:start position:0%
lawyers get it even having paralegals or
 

00:47:46.840 --> 00:47:48.550 align:start position:0%
lawyers get it even having paralegals or
and<00:47:47.080><c> assistants</c><00:47:47.680><c> who</c><00:47:47.840><c> who</c><00:47:48.040><c> literally</c><00:47:48.400><c> make</c>

00:47:48.550 --> 00:47:48.560 align:start position:0%
and assistants who who literally make
 

00:47:48.560 --> 00:47:50.190 align:start position:0%
and assistants who who literally make
the<00:47:48.640><c> world</c><00:47:48.840><c> go</c><00:47:48.960><c> round.</c><00:47:49.320><c> God</c><00:47:49.520><c> bless</c><00:47:49.800><c> you.</c><00:47:50.080><c> We</c>

00:47:50.190 --> 00:47:50.200 align:start position:0%
the world go round. God bless you. We
 

00:47:50.200 --> 00:47:51.470 align:start position:0%
the world go round. God bless you. We
wouldn't<00:47:50.400><c> be</c><00:47:50.520><c> nothing</c><00:47:50.760><c> without</c><00:47:51.080><c> you.</c><00:47:51.240><c> It</c><00:47:51.360><c> is</c>

00:47:51.470 --> 00:47:51.480 align:start position:0%
wouldn't be nothing without you. It is
 

00:47:51.480 --> 00:47:53.550 align:start position:0%
wouldn't be nothing without you. It is
exhausting<00:47:52.200><c> to</c><00:47:52.320><c> feel</c><00:47:52.560><c> like</c><00:47:52.800><c> you</c><00:47:52.920><c> got</c><00:47:53.080><c> to</c><00:47:53.160><c> be</c>

00:47:53.550 --> 00:47:53.560 align:start position:0%
exhausting to feel like you got to be
 

00:47:53.560 --> 00:47:54.990 align:start position:0%
exhausting to feel like you got to be
your

00:47:54.990 --> 00:47:55.000 align:start position:0%
your
 

00:47:55.000 --> 00:47:56.350 align:start position:0%
your
you<00:47:55.120><c> know,</c><00:47:55.280><c> the</c><00:47:55.520><c> the</c><00:47:55.640><c> one</c><00:47:55.800><c> who's</c><00:47:55.960><c> on</c><00:47:56.080><c> top</c><00:47:56.320><c> of</c>

00:47:56.350 --> 00:47:56.360 align:start position:0%
you know, the the one who's on top of
 

00:47:56.360 --> 00:47:58.310 align:start position:0%
you know, the the one who's on top of
everything<00:47:57.000><c> and</c><00:47:57.280><c> with</c><00:47:57.440><c> respect</c><00:47:57.840><c> to</c><00:47:57.960><c> all</c><00:47:58.160><c> of</c>

00:47:58.310 --> 00:47:58.320 align:start position:0%
everything and with respect to all of
 

00:47:58.320 --> 00:48:01.390 align:start position:0%
everything and with respect to all of
the<00:47:58.600><c> Rem</c><00:47:58.800><c> Mazel</c><00:47:59.280><c> social</c><00:47:59.520><c> media</c><00:47:59.760><c> stuff,</c><00:48:00.600><c> like</c>

00:48:01.390 --> 00:48:01.400 align:start position:0%
the Rem Mazel social media stuff, like
 

00:48:01.400 --> 00:48:04.070 align:start position:0%
the Rem Mazel social media stuff, like
it's<00:48:01.640><c> me</c><00:48:01.920><c> and</c><00:48:02.040><c> my</c><00:48:02.200><c> agents</c><00:48:03.080><c> and</c><00:48:03.320><c> my</c><00:48:03.840><c> this</c>

00:48:04.070 --> 00:48:04.080 align:start position:0%
it's me and my agents and my this
 

00:48:04.080 --> 00:48:06.510 align:start position:0%
it's me and my agents and my this
podcast<00:48:04.640><c> network</c><00:48:05.080><c> against</c><00:48:05.360><c> the</c><00:48:05.440><c> world.</c>

00:48:06.510 --> 00:48:06.520 align:start position:0%
podcast network against the world.
 

00:48:06.520 --> 00:48:09.070 align:start position:0%
podcast network against the world.
Truly.<00:48:07.240><c> But,</c><00:48:07.720><c> yay.</c><00:48:08.440><c> Can't</c><00:48:08.640><c> wait</c><00:48:08.760><c> to</c><00:48:08.840><c> talk</c><00:48:09.000><c> to</c>

00:48:09.070 --> 00:48:09.080 align:start position:0%
Truly. But, yay. Can't wait to talk to
 

00:48:09.080 --> 00:48:10.910 align:start position:0%
Truly. But, yay. Can't wait to talk to
you<00:48:09.120><c> more</c><00:48:09.240><c> about</c><00:48:09.480><c> that</c><00:48:09.800><c> later.</c><00:48:10.160><c> I</c><00:48:10.240><c> love</c><00:48:10.440><c> you</c><00:48:10.560><c> so</c>

00:48:10.910 --> 00:48:10.920 align:start position:0%
you more about that later. I love you so
 

00:48:10.920 --> 00:48:14.270 align:start position:0%
you more about that later. I love you so
much.<00:48:12.080><c> Kisses.</c><00:48:13.040><c> Stay</c><00:48:13.280><c> safe.</c><00:48:13.920><c> Don't</c><00:48:14.160><c> get</c>

00:48:14.270 --> 00:48:14.280 align:start position:0%
much. Kisses. Stay safe. Don't get
 

00:48:14.280 --> 00:48:15.990 align:start position:0%
much. Kisses. Stay safe. Don't get
arrested.<00:48:14.800><c> If</c><00:48:14.960><c> you</c><00:48:15.080><c> do,</c><00:48:15.480><c> don't</c><00:48:15.720><c> talk</c><00:48:15.840><c> to</c><00:48:15.920><c> the</c>

00:48:15.990 --> 00:48:16.000 align:start position:0%
arrested. If you do, don't talk to the
 

00:48:16.000 --> 00:48:17.790 align:start position:0%
arrested. If you do, don't talk to the
cops.<00:48:16.360><c> Ask</c><00:48:16.560><c> for</c><00:48:16.680><c> a</c><00:48:16.720><c> lawyer.</c><00:48:17.080><c> Stay</c><00:48:17.280><c> silent.</c><00:48:17.720><c> I</c>

00:48:17.790 --> 00:48:17.800 align:start position:0%
cops. Ask for a lawyer. Stay silent. I
 

00:48:17.800 --> 00:48:20.240 align:start position:0%
cops. Ask for a lawyer. Stay silent. I
love<00:48:18.000><c> you.</c>