WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:01.590 align:start position:0%
 
Microsoft<00:00:00.640><c> changed</c><00:00:00.880><c> the</c><00:00:01.040><c> terms</c><00:00:01.199><c> of</c><00:00:01.360><c> the</c><00:00:01.439><c> sale</c>

00:00:01.590 --> 00:00:01.600 align:start position:0%
Microsoft changed the terms of the sale
 

00:00:01.600 --> 00:00:03.669 align:start position:0%
Microsoft changed the terms of the sale
on<00:00:01.839><c> Microsoft</c><00:00:02.240><c> Office</c><00:00:02.639><c> 2019.</c><00:00:03.280><c> They</c><00:00:03.439><c> released</c>

00:00:03.669 --> 00:00:03.679 align:start position:0%
on Microsoft Office 2019. They released
 

00:00:03.679 --> 00:00:05.510 align:start position:0%
on Microsoft Office 2019. They released
this<00:00:03.840><c> as</c><00:00:04.080><c> perpetually</c><00:00:04.560><c> licensed</c><00:00:04.960><c> software</c>

00:00:05.510 --> 00:00:05.520 align:start position:0%
this as perpetually licensed software
 

00:00:05.520 --> 00:00:06.869 align:start position:0%
this as perpetually licensed software
after<00:00:05.759><c> releasing</c><00:00:06.080><c> it</c><00:00:06.240><c> as</c><00:00:06.400><c> a</c><00:00:06.480><c> perpetual</c>

00:00:06.869 --> 00:00:06.879 align:start position:0%
after releasing it as a perpetual
 

00:00:06.879 --> 00:00:08.629 align:start position:0%
after releasing it as a perpetual
license.<00:00:07.520><c> They</c><00:00:07.839><c> stopped</c><00:00:08.160><c> supporting</c><00:00:08.480><c> it,</c>

00:00:08.629 --> 00:00:08.639 align:start position:0%
license. They stopped supporting it,
 

00:00:08.639 --> 00:00:10.070 align:start position:0%
license. They stopped supporting it,
which<00:00:08.960><c> okay,</c><00:00:09.360><c> whatever.</c><00:00:09.760><c> You're</c><00:00:09.920><c> not</c><00:00:10.000><c> going</c>

00:00:10.070 --> 00:00:10.080 align:start position:0%
which okay, whatever. You're not going
 

00:00:10.080 --> 00:00:11.669 align:start position:0%
which okay, whatever. You're not going
to<00:00:10.160><c> support</c><00:00:10.400><c> software</c><00:00:10.719><c> forever.</c><00:00:11.360><c> But</c><00:00:11.440><c> then</c>

00:00:11.669 --> 00:00:11.679 align:start position:0%
to support software forever. But then
 

00:00:11.679 --> 00:00:12.950 align:start position:0%
to support software forever. But then
they<00:00:11.840><c> made</c><00:00:12.000><c> it</c><00:00:12.160><c> so</c><00:00:12.240><c> that</c><00:00:12.400><c> this</c><00:00:12.559><c> is</c><00:00:12.639><c> not</c><00:00:12.800><c> even</c>

00:00:12.950 --> 00:00:12.960 align:start position:0%
they made it so that this is not even
 

00:00:12.960 --> 00:00:14.789 align:start position:0%
they made it so that this is not even
going<00:00:13.200><c> to</c><00:00:13.360><c> work</c><00:00:13.599><c> and</c><00:00:13.840><c> function</c><00:00:14.160><c> properly</c><00:00:14.559><c> into</c>

00:00:14.789 --> 00:00:14.799 align:start position:0%
going to work and function properly into
 

00:00:14.799 --> 00:00:16.230 align:start position:0%
going to work and function properly into
the<00:00:14.960><c> future.</c><00:00:15.360><c> And</c><00:00:15.519><c> they</c><00:00:15.679><c> edited</c><00:00:16.080><c> their</c>

00:00:16.230 --> 00:00:16.240 align:start position:0%
the future. And they edited their
 

00:00:16.240 --> 00:00:17.910 align:start position:0%
the future. And they edited their
website<00:00:16.560><c> to</c><00:00:16.720><c> make</c><00:00:16.880><c> it</c><00:00:17.039><c> seem</c><00:00:17.279><c> like</c><00:00:17.440><c> they</c><00:00:17.680><c> never</c>

00:00:17.910 --> 00:00:17.920 align:start position:0%
website to make it seem like they never
 

00:00:17.920 --> 00:00:19.590 align:start position:0%
website to make it seem like they never
promised<00:00:18.240><c> that.</c><00:00:18.560><c> Check</c><00:00:18.800><c> this</c><00:00:18.960><c> out.</c><00:00:19.199><c> I</c><00:00:19.439><c> was</c>

00:00:19.590 --> 00:00:19.600 align:start position:0%
promised that. Check this out. I was
 

00:00:19.600 --> 00:00:21.189 align:start position:0%
promised that. Check this out. I was
reading<00:00:19.760><c> the</c><00:00:19.920><c> site</c><00:00:20.240><c> Jimmy</c><00:00:20.560><c> Tech</c><00:00:20.800><c> from</c><00:00:21.039><c> San</c>

00:00:21.189 --> 00:00:21.199 align:start position:0%
reading the site Jimmy Tech from San
 

00:00:21.199 --> 00:00:23.830 align:start position:0%
reading the site Jimmy Tech from San
Francisco.<00:00:21.920><c> It</c><00:00:22.240><c> said,</c><00:00:22.400><c> and</c><00:00:22.640><c> I</c><00:00:22.880><c> quote,</c><00:00:23.439><c> "In</c>

00:00:23.830 --> 00:00:23.840 align:start position:0%
Francisco. It said, and I quote, "In
 

00:00:23.840 --> 00:00:25.830 align:start position:0%
Francisco. It said, and I quote, "In
October<00:00:24.240><c> 2023,</c><00:00:24.960><c> when</c><00:00:25.119><c> Microsoft</c><00:00:25.600><c> ended</c>

00:00:25.830 --> 00:00:25.840 align:start position:0%
October 2023, when Microsoft ended
 

00:00:25.840 --> 00:00:27.750 align:start position:0%
October 2023, when Microsoft ended
support<00:00:26.080><c> for</c><00:00:26.240><c> Office</c><00:00:26.560><c> 2019</c><00:00:27.039><c> for</c><00:00:27.279><c> Mac,</c><00:00:27.599><c> they</c>

00:00:27.750 --> 00:00:27.760 align:start position:0%
support for Office 2019 for Mac, they
 

00:00:27.760 --> 00:00:29.589 align:start position:0%
support for Office 2019 for Mac, they
explicitly<00:00:28.160><c> told</c><00:00:28.400><c> customers,</c><00:00:28.960><c> rest</c><00:00:29.199><c> assured</c>

00:00:29.589 --> 00:00:29.599 align:start position:0%
explicitly told customers, rest assured
 

00:00:29.599 --> 00:00:31.429 align:start position:0%
explicitly told customers, rest assured
that<00:00:29.760><c> all</c><00:00:29.840><c> of</c><00:00:29.920><c> your</c><00:00:30.080><c> Office</c><00:00:30.480><c> 2019</c><00:00:30.960><c> apps</c><00:00:31.199><c> will</c>

00:00:31.429 --> 00:00:31.439 align:start position:0%
that all of your Office 2019 apps will
 

00:00:31.439 --> 00:00:33.190 align:start position:0%
that all of your Office 2019 apps will
continue<00:00:31.599><c> to</c><00:00:31.840><c> function."</c><00:00:32.559><c> This</c><00:00:32.800><c> sounds</c><00:00:33.040><c> like</c>

00:00:33.190 --> 00:00:33.200 align:start position:0%
continue to function." This sounds like
 

00:00:33.200 --> 00:00:34.709 align:start position:0%
continue to function." This sounds like
they<00:00:33.360><c> are</c><00:00:33.520><c> now</c><00:00:33.680><c> breaking</c><00:00:34.000><c> that</c><00:00:34.160><c> promise.</c><00:00:34.559><c> So,</c>

00:00:34.709 --> 00:00:34.719 align:start position:0%
they are now breaking that promise. So,
 

00:00:34.719 --> 00:00:35.910 align:start position:0%
they are now breaking that promise. So,
I<00:00:34.880><c> clicked</c><00:00:35.040><c> the</c><00:00:35.200><c> link</c><00:00:35.280><c> to</c><00:00:35.440><c> see</c><00:00:35.600><c> what</c><00:00:35.680><c> he's</c>

00:00:35.910 --> 00:00:35.920 align:start position:0%
I clicked the link to see what he's
 

00:00:35.920 --> 00:00:36.950 align:start position:0%
I clicked the link to see what he's
talking<00:00:36.079><c> about.</c><00:00:36.320><c> And</c><00:00:36.399><c> when</c><00:00:36.559><c> I</c><00:00:36.719><c> clicked</c><00:00:36.880><c> the</c>

00:00:36.950 --> 00:00:36.960 align:start position:0%
talking about. And when I clicked the
 

00:00:36.960 --> 00:00:40.069 align:start position:0%
talking about. And when I clicked the
link,<00:00:37.520><c> it</c><00:00:37.920><c> doesn't</c><00:00:38.239><c> say</c><00:00:38.399><c> that</c><00:00:38.640><c> at</c><00:00:38.800><c> all.</c><00:00:39.440><c> Let</c>

00:00:40.069 --> 00:00:40.079 align:start position:0%
link, it doesn't say that at all. Let
 

00:00:40.079 --> 00:00:41.670 align:start position:0%
link, it doesn't say that at all. Let
you<00:00:40.239><c> can</c><00:00:40.320><c> do</c><00:00:40.399><c> it,</c><00:00:40.559><c> Spectrum.</c><00:00:41.040><c> You</c><00:00:41.200><c> can</c><00:00:41.520><c> There</c>

00:00:41.670 --> 00:00:41.680 align:start position:0%
you can do it, Spectrum. You can There
 

00:00:41.680 --> 00:00:43.590 align:start position:0%
you can do it, Spectrum. You can There
you<00:00:41.760><c> go.</c><00:00:41.920><c> Support</c><00:00:42.160><c> for</c><00:00:42.320><c> Office</c><00:00:42.719><c> 2019</c><00:00:43.200><c> ended</c><00:00:43.440><c> on</c>

00:00:43.590 --> 00:00:43.600 align:start position:0%
you go. Support for Office 2019 ended on
 

00:00:43.600 --> 00:00:45.830 align:start position:0%
you go. Support for Office 2019 ended on
October<00:00:43.920><c> 10,</c><00:00:44.239><c> 2023.</c><00:00:44.960><c> Rest</c><00:00:45.200><c> assured</c><00:00:45.520><c> that</c><00:00:45.680><c> all</c>

00:00:45.830 --> 00:00:45.840 align:start position:0%
October 10, 2023. Rest assured that all
 

00:00:45.840 --> 00:00:47.830 align:start position:0%
October 10, 2023. Rest assured that all
your<00:00:46.000><c> Office</c><00:00:46.320><c> 2019</c><00:00:46.800><c> apps</c><00:00:47.120><c> won't</c><00:00:47.360><c> lose</c><00:00:47.600><c> any</c>

00:00:47.830 --> 00:00:47.840 align:start position:0%
your Office 2019 apps won't lose any
 

00:00:47.840 --> 00:00:49.910 align:start position:0%
your Office 2019 apps won't lose any
data.<00:00:48.160><c> Your</c><00:00:48.320><c> data</c><00:00:48.559><c> can</c><00:00:48.719><c> be</c><00:00:48.800><c> accessed</c><00:00:49.280><c> on</c><00:00:49.600><c> any</c>

00:00:49.910 --> 00:00:49.920 align:start position:0%
data. Your data can be accessed on any
 

00:00:49.920 --> 00:00:51.750 align:start position:0%
data. Your data can be accessed on any
supported<00:00:50.320><c> Microsoft</c><00:00:50.719><c> 365</c><00:00:51.280><c> or</c><00:00:51.440><c> Office</c>

00:00:51.750 --> 00:00:51.760 align:start position:0%
supported Microsoft 365 or Office
 

00:00:51.760 --> 00:00:53.590 align:start position:0%
supported Microsoft 365 or Office
product.<00:00:52.320><c> That's</c><00:00:52.640><c> and</c><00:00:52.800><c> I</c><00:00:52.960><c> look</c><00:00:53.120><c> for</c><00:00:53.280><c> the</c><00:00:53.440><c> word</c>

00:00:53.590 --> 00:00:53.600 align:start position:0%
product. That's and I look for the word
 

00:00:53.600 --> 00:00:55.270 align:start position:0%
product. That's and I look for the word
assured<00:00:54.239><c> and</c><00:00:54.480><c> that's</c><00:00:54.640><c> the</c><00:00:54.879><c> only</c><00:00:54.960><c> time</c><00:00:55.120><c> that</c>

00:00:55.270 --> 00:00:55.280 align:start position:0%
assured and that's the only time that
 

00:00:55.280 --> 00:00:56.549 align:start position:0%
assured and that's the only time that
the<00:00:55.440><c> word</c><00:00:55.600><c> assured</c><00:00:55.920><c> showed</c><00:00:56.079><c> up</c><00:00:56.239><c> in</c><00:00:56.399><c> this</c>

00:00:56.549 --> 00:00:56.559 align:start position:0%
the word assured showed up in this
 

00:00:56.559 --> 00:00:58.069 align:start position:0%
the word assured showed up in this
article.<00:00:56.879><c> So</c><00:00:57.120><c> what</c><00:00:57.280><c> what</c><00:00:57.440><c> is</c><00:00:57.600><c> going</c><00:00:57.680><c> on</c><00:00:57.840><c> here?</c>

00:00:58.069 --> 00:00:58.079 align:start position:0%
article. So what what is going on here?
 

00:00:58.079 --> 00:01:00.229 align:start position:0%
article. So what what is going on here?
Is<00:00:58.239><c> this</c><00:00:58.480><c> Jimmy</c><00:00:59.199><c> lying</c><00:00:59.520><c> to</c><00:00:59.680><c> me?</c><00:00:59.920><c> Is</c><00:01:00.079><c> he</c>

00:01:00.229 --> 00:01:00.239 align:start position:0%
Is this Jimmy lying to me? Is he
 

00:01:00.239 --> 00:01:02.470 align:start position:0%
Is this Jimmy lying to me? Is he
rage<00:01:00.559><c> baiting</c><00:01:00.879><c> me?</c><00:01:01.280><c> No.</c><00:01:01.600><c> I</c><00:01:01.840><c> decided</c><00:01:02.079><c> to</c><00:01:02.239><c> go</c><00:01:02.320><c> to</c>

00:01:02.470 --> 00:01:02.480 align:start position:0%
rage baiting me? No. I decided to go to
 

00:01:02.480 --> 00:01:04.149 align:start position:0%
rage baiting me? No. I decided to go to
archive.org<00:01:03.280><c> and</c><00:01:03.440><c> I</c><00:01:03.600><c> found</c><00:01:03.760><c> that</c><00:01:03.920><c> they</c>

00:01:04.149 --> 00:01:04.159 align:start position:0%
archive.org and I found that they
 

00:01:04.159 --> 00:01:05.830 align:start position:0%
archive.org and I found that they
actually<00:01:04.400><c> edited</c><00:01:04.799><c> their</c><00:01:05.360><c> website</c><00:01:05.680><c> on</c>

00:01:05.830 --> 00:01:05.840 align:start position:0%
actually edited their website on
 

00:01:05.840 --> 00:01:07.670 align:start position:0%
actually edited their website on
the<00:01:06.080><c> same</c><00:01:06.159><c> URL.</c><00:01:06.799><c> Notice</c><00:01:07.119><c> over</c><00:01:07.280><c> here</c><00:01:07.360><c> that</c><00:01:07.600><c> it</c>

00:01:07.670 --> 00:01:07.680 align:start position:0%
the same URL. Notice over here that it
 

00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:10.789 align:start position:0%
the same URL. Notice over here that it
says<00:01:07.920><c> this</c><00:01:08.000><c> is</c><00:01:08.159><c> published</c><00:01:08.560><c> May</c><00:01:08.799><c> 15,</c><00:01:09.280><c> 2026.</c>

00:01:10.789 --> 00:01:10.799 align:start position:0%
says this is published May 15, 2026.
 

00:01:10.799 --> 00:01:13.590 align:start position:0%
says this is published May 15, 2026.
They<00:01:11.040><c> didn't</c><00:01:11.200><c> say</c><00:01:11.680><c> updated</c><00:01:12.240><c> May</c><00:01:12.560><c> 15,</c><00:01:12.880><c> 2026.</c>

00:01:13.590 --> 00:01:13.600 align:start position:0%
They didn't say updated May 15, 2026.
 

00:01:13.600 --> 00:01:15.830 align:start position:0%
They didn't say updated May 15, 2026.
They<00:01:13.760><c> said</c><00:01:13.920><c> published</c><00:01:14.400><c> May</c><00:01:14.720><c> 15,</c><00:01:15.040><c> 2026.</c><00:01:15.680><c> But</c><00:01:15.760><c> if</c>

00:01:15.830 --> 00:01:15.840 align:start position:0%
They said published May 15, 2026. But if
 

00:01:15.840 --> 00:01:17.190 align:start position:0%
They said published May 15, 2026. But if
you<00:01:15.920><c> go</c><00:01:16.000><c> to</c><00:01:16.080><c> archive.org,</c><00:01:16.640><c> or</c><00:01:16.880><c> you</c><00:01:16.960><c> can</c><00:01:17.119><c> see</c>

00:01:17.190 --> 00:01:17.200 align:start position:0%
you go to archive.org, or you can see
 

00:01:17.200 --> 00:01:18.630 align:start position:0%
you go to archive.org, or you can see
what<00:01:17.360><c> they</c><00:01:17.520><c> actually</c><00:01:17.840><c> said</c><00:01:18.000><c> when</c><00:01:18.159><c> they</c><00:01:18.320><c> ended</c>

00:01:18.630 --> 00:01:18.640 align:start position:0%
what they actually said when they ended
 

00:01:18.640 --> 00:01:20.710 align:start position:0%
what they actually said when they ended
support.<00:01:19.119><c> Support</c><00:01:19.439><c> for</c><00:01:19.600><c> Office</c><00:01:19.920><c> 2019</c><00:01:20.320><c> for</c><00:01:20.560><c> Mac</c>

00:01:20.710 --> 00:01:20.720 align:start position:0%
support. Support for Office 2019 for Mac
 

00:01:20.720 --> 00:01:23.030 align:start position:0%
support. Support for Office 2019 for Mac
will<00:01:20.880><c> end</c><00:01:21.040><c> on</c><00:01:21.200><c> October</c><00:01:21.600><c> 10,</c><00:01:21.920><c> 2023.</c><00:01:22.799><c> Rest</c>

00:01:23.030 --> 00:01:23.040 align:start position:0%
will end on October 10, 2023. Rest
 

00:01:23.040 --> 00:01:24.950 align:start position:0%
will end on October 10, 2023. Rest
assured<00:01:23.439><c> that</c><00:01:23.680><c> all</c><00:01:23.759><c> of</c><00:01:23.920><c> your</c><00:01:24.080><c> Office</c><00:01:24.479><c> 2019</c>

00:01:24.950 --> 00:01:24.960 align:start position:0%
assured that all of your Office 2019
 

00:01:24.960 --> 00:01:26.710 align:start position:0%
assured that all of your Office 2019
apps<00:01:25.280><c> will</c><00:01:25.520><c> continue</c><00:01:25.759><c> to</c><00:01:26.000><c> function.</c><00:01:26.479><c> They</c>

00:01:26.710 --> 00:01:26.720 align:start position:0%
apps will continue to function. They
 

00:01:26.720 --> 00:01:28.469 align:start position:0%
apps will continue to function. They
won't<00:01:26.880><c> disappear</c><00:01:27.280><c> from</c><00:01:27.439><c> your</c><00:01:27.600><c> Mac,</c><00:01:28.000><c> nor</c><00:01:28.240><c> will</c>

00:01:28.469 --> 00:01:28.479 align:start position:0%
won't disappear from your Mac, nor will
 

00:01:28.479 --> 00:01:30.950 align:start position:0%
won't disappear from your Mac, nor will
you<00:01:28.640><c> lose</c><00:01:28.960><c> any</c><00:01:29.200><c> data.</c><00:01:29.759><c> So,</c><00:01:29.920><c> they</c><00:01:30.240><c> updated</c><00:01:30.720><c> this</c>

00:01:30.950 --> 00:01:30.960 align:start position:0%
you lose any data. So, they updated this
 

00:01:30.960 --> 00:01:32.870 align:start position:0%
you lose any data. So, they updated this
page.<00:01:31.520><c> They</c><00:01:31.759><c> didn't</c><00:01:32.000><c> publish</c><00:01:32.240><c> a</c><00:01:32.479><c> new</c><00:01:32.560><c> page.</c>

00:01:32.870 --> 00:01:32.880 align:start position:0%
page. They didn't publish a new page.
 

00:01:32.880 --> 00:01:35.190 align:start position:0%
page. They didn't publish a new page.
They<00:01:33.119><c> updated</c><00:01:33.600><c> the</c><00:01:33.840><c> existing</c><00:01:34.240><c> page</c><00:01:34.720><c> without</c>

00:01:35.190 --> 00:01:35.200 align:start position:0%
They updated the existing page without
 

00:01:35.200 --> 00:01:36.870 align:start position:0%
They updated the existing page without
telling<00:01:35.439><c> you</c><00:01:35.600><c> that</c><00:01:35.759><c> they</c><00:01:35.920><c> did</c><00:01:36.079><c> that</c><00:01:36.400><c> to</c><00:01:36.640><c> remove</c>

00:01:36.870 --> 00:01:36.880 align:start position:0%
telling you that they did that to remove
 

00:01:36.880 --> 00:01:38.390 align:start position:0%
telling you that they did that to remove
the<00:01:37.119><c> part</c><00:01:37.280><c> where</c><00:01:37.439><c> it</c><00:01:37.600><c> said</c><00:01:37.759><c> that</c><00:01:37.920><c> the</c><00:01:38.079><c> apps</c>

00:01:38.390 --> 00:01:38.400 align:start position:0%
the part where it said that the apps
 

00:01:38.400 --> 00:01:40.230 align:start position:0%
the part where it said that the apps
will<00:01:38.640><c> continue</c><00:01:38.960><c> to</c><00:01:39.200><c> function.</c><00:01:39.840><c> If</c><00:01:40.079><c> you</c><00:01:40.159><c> want</c>

00:01:40.230 --> 00:01:40.240 align:start position:0%
will continue to function. If you want
 

00:01:40.240 --> 00:01:41.910 align:start position:0%
will continue to function. If you want
to<00:01:40.400><c> use</c><00:01:40.560><c> these</c><00:01:40.799><c> older</c><00:01:41.040><c> versions</c><00:01:41.280><c> of</c><00:01:41.439><c> Microsoft</c>

00:01:41.910 --> 00:01:41.920 align:start position:0%
to use these older versions of Microsoft
 

00:01:41.920 --> 00:01:44.390 align:start position:0%
to use these older versions of Microsoft
Office<00:01:42.320><c> now,</c><00:01:42.880><c> you</c><00:01:43.200><c> can</c><00:01:43.439><c> only</c><00:01:43.680><c> use</c><00:01:43.920><c> it</c><00:01:44.079><c> in</c><00:01:44.240><c> a</c>

00:01:44.390 --> 00:01:44.400 align:start position:0%
Office now, you can only use it in a
 

00:01:44.400 --> 00:01:46.230 align:start position:0%
Office now, you can only use it in a
readonly<00:01:44.960><c> mode.</c><00:01:45.280><c> you're</c><00:01:45.600><c> not</c><00:01:45.759><c> going</c><00:01:45.840><c> to</c><00:01:46.079><c> be</c>

00:01:46.230 --> 00:01:46.240 align:start position:0%
readonly mode. you're not going to be
 

00:01:46.240 --> 00:01:48.630 align:start position:0%
readonly mode. you're not going to be
able<00:01:46.479><c> to</c><00:01:46.720><c> edit</c><00:01:47.040><c> or</c><00:01:47.360><c> save</c><00:01:47.680><c> your</c><00:01:47.920><c> documents.</c><00:01:48.479><c> So,</c>

00:01:48.630 --> 00:01:48.640 align:start position:0%
able to edit or save your documents. So,
 

00:01:48.640 --> 00:01:50.230 align:start position:0%
able to edit or save your documents. So,
if<00:01:48.799><c> you</c><00:01:48.960><c> paid</c><00:01:49.200><c> full</c><00:01:49.439><c> price</c><00:01:49.680><c> for</c><00:01:49.840><c> a</c><00:01:50.000><c> word</c>

00:01:50.230 --> 00:01:50.240 align:start position:0%
if you paid full price for a word
 

00:01:50.240 --> 00:01:52.550 align:start position:0%
if you paid full price for a word
processor<00:01:50.720><c> software</c><00:01:51.439><c> 7</c><00:01:51.680><c> years</c><00:01:51.840><c> ago,</c><00:01:52.320><c> you're</c>

00:01:52.550 --> 00:01:52.560 align:start position:0%
processor software 7 years ago, you're
 

00:01:52.560 --> 00:01:53.749 align:start position:0%
processor software 7 years ago, you're
not<00:01:52.640><c> going</c><00:01:52.720><c> to</c><00:01:52.799><c> be</c><00:01:52.880><c> able</c><00:01:53.040><c> to</c><00:01:53.119><c> use</c><00:01:53.280><c> that</c><00:01:53.439><c> word</c>

00:01:53.749 --> 00:01:53.759 align:start position:0%
not going to be able to use that word
 

00:01:53.759 --> 00:01:55.350 align:start position:0%
not going to be able to use that word
processing<00:01:54.159><c> software</c><00:01:54.560><c> again,</c><00:01:55.040><c> even</c><00:01:55.200><c> though</c>

00:01:55.350 --> 00:01:55.360 align:start position:0%
processing software again, even though
 

00:01:55.360 --> 00:01:56.710 align:start position:0%
processing software again, even though
you<00:01:55.520><c> paid</c><00:01:55.680><c> for</c><00:01:55.840><c> the</c><00:01:55.920><c> perpetual</c><00:01:56.320><c> license.</c>

00:01:56.710 --> 00:01:56.720 align:start position:0%
you paid for the perpetual license.
 

00:01:56.720 --> 00:01:58.630 align:start position:0%
you paid for the perpetual license.
Someone<00:01:56.960><c> from</c><00:01:57.119><c> Apple</c><00:01:57.360><c> insider,</c><00:01:57.840><c> Amber</c><00:01:58.240><c> Neil,</c>

00:01:58.630 --> 00:01:58.640 align:start position:0%
Someone from Apple insider, Amber Neil,
 

00:01:58.640 --> 00:02:00.149 align:start position:0%
Someone from Apple insider, Amber Neil,
makes<00:01:58.799><c> a</c><00:01:58.960><c> very</c><00:01:59.119><c> good</c><00:01:59.280><c> point.</c><00:01:59.600><c> Certificates</c>

00:02:00.149 --> 00:02:00.159 align:start position:0%
makes a very good point. Certificates
 

00:02:00.159 --> 00:02:01.670 align:start position:0%
makes a very good point. Certificates
can<00:02:00.320><c> get</c><00:02:00.399><c> renewed.</c><00:02:00.799><c> The</c><00:02:00.960><c> fact</c><00:02:01.040><c> that</c><00:02:01.200><c> Microsoft</c>

00:02:01.670 --> 00:02:01.680 align:start position:0%
can get renewed. The fact that Microsoft
 

00:02:01.680 --> 00:02:03.190 align:start position:0%
can get renewed. The fact that Microsoft
is<00:02:01.840><c> using</c><00:02:02.000><c> the</c><00:02:02.240><c> expiration</c><00:02:02.560><c> of</c><00:02:02.719><c> a</c><00:02:02.880><c> certificate</c>

00:02:03.190 --> 00:02:03.200 align:start position:0%
is using the expiration of a certificate
 

00:02:03.200 --> 00:02:04.630 align:start position:0%
is using the expiration of a certificate
as<00:02:03.360><c> a</c><00:02:03.520><c> deadline</c><00:02:03.759><c> that</c><00:02:03.920><c> retires</c><00:02:04.320><c> older</c>

00:02:04.630 --> 00:02:04.640 align:start position:0%
as a deadline that retires older
 

00:02:04.640 --> 00:02:06.230 align:start position:0%
as a deadline that retires older
versions<00:02:04.799><c> of</c><00:02:04.960><c> Office</c><00:02:05.439><c> rather</c><00:02:05.680><c> than</c><00:02:05.840><c> quietly</c>

00:02:06.230 --> 00:02:06.240 align:start position:0%
versions of Office rather than quietly
 

00:02:06.240 --> 00:02:08.630 align:start position:0%
versions of Office rather than quietly
renewing<00:02:06.560><c> the</c><00:02:06.799><c> certificate</c><00:02:07.360><c> is</c><00:02:07.759><c> a</c><00:02:08.239><c> choice.</c>

00:02:08.630 --> 00:02:08.640 align:start position:0%
renewing the certificate is a choice.
 

00:02:08.640 --> 00:02:10.309 align:start position:0%
renewing the certificate is a choice.
I'm<00:02:08.879><c> not</c><00:02:09.039><c> saying</c><00:02:09.200><c> it's</c><00:02:09.440><c> right</c><00:02:09.679><c> to</c><00:02:10.160><c> people</c>

00:02:10.309 --> 00:02:10.319 align:start position:0%
I'm not saying it's right to people
 

00:02:10.319 --> 00:02:11.910 align:start position:0%
I'm not saying it's right to people
over.<00:02:10.640><c> I</c><00:02:10.800><c> want</c><00:02:10.879><c> to</c><00:02:11.039><c> be</c><00:02:11.120><c> clear,</c><00:02:11.360><c> but</c><00:02:11.599><c> there's</c><00:02:11.760><c> a</c>

00:02:11.910 --> 00:02:11.920 align:start position:0%
over. I want to be clear, but there's a
 

00:02:11.920 --> 00:02:13.430 align:start position:0%
over. I want to be clear, but there's a
difference<00:02:12.160><c> in</c><00:02:12.319><c> the</c><00:02:12.560><c> way</c><00:02:12.720><c> that</c><00:02:12.879><c> a</c><00:02:13.200><c> small</c>

00:02:13.430 --> 00:02:13.440 align:start position:0%
difference in the way that a small
 

00:02:13.440 --> 00:02:14.949 align:start position:0%
difference in the way that a small
company<00:02:13.680><c> will</c><00:02:14.160><c> somebody</c><00:02:14.400><c> over</c><00:02:14.640><c> versus</c>

00:02:14.949 --> 00:02:14.959 align:start position:0%
company will somebody over versus
 

00:02:14.959 --> 00:02:16.309 align:start position:0%
company will somebody over versus
how<00:02:15.120><c> a</c><00:02:15.280><c> big</c><00:02:15.440><c> company</c><00:02:15.680><c> will</c><00:02:16.160><c> somebody</c>

00:02:16.309 --> 00:02:16.319 align:start position:0%
how a big company will somebody
 

00:02:16.319 --> 00:02:18.949 align:start position:0%
how a big company will somebody
over.<00:02:16.640><c> It's</c><00:02:16.800><c> usually</c><00:02:17.360><c> like</c><00:02:18.000><c> a</c><00:02:18.239><c> a</c><00:02:18.480><c> buttoned</c><00:02:18.800><c> up</c>

00:02:18.949 --> 00:02:18.959 align:start position:0%
over. It's usually like a a buttoned up
 

00:02:18.959 --> 00:02:21.270 align:start position:0%
over. It's usually like a a buttoned up
way<00:02:19.280><c> versus</c><00:02:19.680><c> the</c><00:02:20.080><c> uh</c><00:02:20.239><c> like</c><00:02:20.480><c> the</c><00:02:20.720><c> more</c><00:02:20.959><c> direct</c>

00:02:21.270 --> 00:02:21.280 align:start position:0%
way versus the uh like the more direct
 

00:02:21.280 --> 00:02:23.430 align:start position:0%
way versus the uh like the more direct
way.<00:02:21.680><c> For</c><00:02:21.840><c> instance,</c><00:02:22.319><c> if</c><00:02:22.560><c> I'm</c><00:02:22.800><c> dealing</c><00:02:23.040><c> with</c><00:02:23.200><c> a</c>

00:02:23.430 --> 00:02:23.440 align:start position:0%
way. For instance, if I'm dealing with a
 

00:02:23.440 --> 00:02:26.070 align:start position:0%
way. For instance, if I'm dealing with a
small<00:02:23.680><c> bodega</c><00:02:24.319><c> in</c><00:02:24.480><c> Bedstey</c><00:02:25.200><c> and</c><00:02:25.440><c> I</c><00:02:25.680><c> walk</c><00:02:25.840><c> into</c>

00:02:26.070 --> 00:02:26.080 align:start position:0%
small bodega in Bedstey and I walk into
 

00:02:26.080 --> 00:02:27.910 align:start position:0%
small bodega in Bedstey and I walk into
the<00:02:26.239><c> deli,</c><00:02:26.640><c> I</c><00:02:26.879><c> have</c><00:02:26.959><c> a</c><00:02:27.120><c> suit</c><00:02:27.280><c> and</c><00:02:27.360><c> a</c><00:02:27.520><c> tie</c><00:02:27.680><c> and</c><00:02:27.760><c> a</c>

00:02:27.910 --> 00:02:27.920 align:start position:0%
the deli, I have a suit and a tie and a
 

00:02:27.920 --> 00:02:29.030 align:start position:0%
the deli, I have a suit and a tie and a
polo<00:02:28.160><c> shirt</c><00:02:28.319><c> and</c><00:02:28.480><c> dress</c><00:02:28.720><c> shoes</c><00:02:28.879><c> and</c>

00:02:29.030 --> 00:02:29.040 align:start position:0%
polo shirt and dress shoes and
 

00:02:29.040 --> 00:02:30.710 align:start position:0%
polo shirt and dress shoes and
everything.<00:02:29.440><c> I</c><00:02:29.599><c> may</c><00:02:29.840><c> pay</c><00:02:30.080><c> more</c><00:02:30.319><c> money</c><00:02:30.560><c> than</c>

00:02:30.710 --> 00:02:30.720 align:start position:0%
everything. I may pay more money than
 

00:02:30.720 --> 00:02:31.910 align:start position:0%
everything. I may pay more money than
one<00:02:30.879><c> of</c><00:02:30.959><c> the</c><00:02:31.120><c> people</c><00:02:31.200><c> from</c><00:02:31.360><c> the</c><00:02:31.520><c> block</c><00:02:31.680><c> that's</c>

00:02:31.910 --> 00:02:31.920 align:start position:0%
one of the people from the block that's
 

00:02:31.920 --> 00:02:33.670 align:start position:0%
one of the people from the block that's
lived<00:02:32.080><c> there</c><00:02:32.239><c> for</c><00:02:32.480><c> 40</c><00:02:32.720><c> years.</c><00:02:33.280><c> They</c><00:02:33.519><c> don't</c>

00:02:33.670 --> 00:02:33.680 align:start position:0%
lived there for 40 years. They don't
 

00:02:33.680 --> 00:02:35.589 align:start position:0%
lived there for 40 years. They don't
have<00:02:33.840><c> price</c><00:02:34.080><c> tags</c><00:02:34.400><c> on</c><00:02:34.560><c> the</c><00:02:34.800><c> merchandise</c><00:02:35.360><c> and</c>

00:02:35.589 --> 00:02:35.599 align:start position:0%
have price tags on the merchandise and
 

00:02:35.599 --> 00:02:37.030 align:start position:0%
have price tags on the merchandise and
the<00:02:35.840><c> guy</c><00:02:35.920><c> at</c><00:02:36.080><c> the</c><00:02:36.319><c> counter</c><00:02:36.560><c> may</c><00:02:36.720><c> just</c><00:02:36.879><c> think</c>

00:02:37.030 --> 00:02:37.040 align:start position:0%
the guy at the counter may just think
 

00:02:37.040 --> 00:02:38.309 align:start position:0%
the guy at the counter may just think
I'm<00:02:37.200><c> willing</c><00:02:37.360><c> to</c><00:02:37.440><c> pay</c><00:02:37.599><c> a</c><00:02:37.680><c> dollar</c><00:02:37.920><c> more,</c><00:02:38.160><c> so</c>

00:02:38.309 --> 00:02:38.319 align:start position:0%
I'm willing to pay a dollar more, so
 

00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:39.830 align:start position:0%
I'm willing to pay a dollar more, so
he'll<00:02:38.480><c> charge</c><00:02:38.640><c> me</c><00:02:38.800><c> a</c><00:02:38.959><c> dollar</c><00:02:39.120><c> more.</c><00:02:39.440><c> It's</c><00:02:39.680><c> not</c>

00:02:39.830 --> 00:02:39.840 align:start position:0%
he'll charge me a dollar more. It's not
 

00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:42.309 align:start position:0%
he'll charge me a dollar more. It's not
right,<00:02:40.319><c> but</c><00:02:40.879><c> it's</c><00:02:41.200><c> kind</c><00:02:41.280><c> of</c><00:02:41.360><c> underhanded,</c><00:02:42.160><c> but</c>

00:02:42.309 --> 00:02:42.319 align:start position:0%
right, but it's kind of underhanded, but
 

00:02:42.319 --> 00:02:43.750 align:start position:0%
right, but it's kind of underhanded, but
it's<00:02:42.560><c> different</c><00:02:42.800><c> from</c><00:02:42.959><c> how</c><00:02:43.120><c> I</c><00:02:43.280><c> would</c><00:02:43.440><c> expect</c>

00:02:43.750 --> 00:02:43.760 align:start position:0%
it's different from how I would expect
 

00:02:43.760 --> 00:02:45.430 align:start position:0%
it's different from how I would expect
Amazon<00:02:44.160><c> to</c><00:02:44.480><c> you</c><00:02:44.640><c> over.</c><00:02:44.879><c> Amazon</c><00:02:45.280><c> will</c>

00:02:45.430 --> 00:02:45.440 align:start position:0%
Amazon to you over. Amazon will
 

00:02:45.440 --> 00:02:47.030 align:start position:0%
Amazon to you over. Amazon will
sell<00:02:45.599><c> something</c><00:02:45.760><c> at</c><00:02:45.920><c> a</c><00:02:46.080><c> hyper</c><00:02:46.319><c> low</c><00:02:46.560><c> price.</c><00:02:46.879><c> So,</c>

00:02:47.030 --> 00:02:47.040 align:start position:0%
sell something at a hyper low price. So,
 

00:02:47.040 --> 00:02:48.390 align:start position:0%
sell something at a hyper low price. So,
when<00:02:47.200><c> people</c><00:02:47.360><c> are</c><00:02:47.519><c> doing</c><00:02:47.680><c> fulfillment</c><00:02:48.160><c> by</c>

00:02:48.390 --> 00:02:48.400 align:start position:0%
when people are doing fulfillment by
 

00:02:48.400 --> 00:02:49.750 align:start position:0%
when people are doing fulfillment by
Prime,<00:02:48.879><c> they'll</c><00:02:49.120><c> figure</c><00:02:49.360><c> out</c><00:02:49.440><c> who</c><00:02:49.599><c> the</c>

00:02:49.750 --> 00:02:49.760 align:start position:0%
Prime, they'll figure out who the
 

00:02:49.760 --> 00:02:51.110 align:start position:0%
Prime, they'll figure out who the
supplier<00:02:50.080><c> is</c><00:02:50.239><c> of</c><00:02:50.400><c> the</c><00:02:50.560><c> product</c><00:02:50.800><c> and</c><00:02:50.959><c> then</c>

00:02:51.110 --> 00:02:51.120 align:start position:0%
supplier is of the product and then
 

00:02:51.120 --> 00:02:52.390 align:start position:0%
supplier is of the product and then
they'll<00:02:51.360><c> start</c><00:02:51.519><c> selling</c><00:02:51.760><c> a</c><00:02:52.000><c> cheaper</c><00:02:52.239><c> product</c>

00:02:52.390 --> 00:02:52.400 align:start position:0%
they'll start selling a cheaper product
 

00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:53.750 align:start position:0%
they'll start selling a cheaper product
and<00:02:52.640><c> then</c><00:02:52.720><c> once</c><00:02:52.959><c> everybody</c><00:02:53.200><c> that</c><00:02:53.360><c> sells</c><00:02:53.599><c> that</c>

00:02:53.750 --> 00:02:53.760 align:start position:0%
and then once everybody that sells that
 

00:02:53.760 --> 00:02:54.949 align:start position:0%
and then once everybody that sells that
product<00:02:53.920><c> is</c><00:02:54.160><c> out</c><00:02:54.319><c> of</c><00:02:54.400><c> business,</c><00:02:54.640><c> then</c><00:02:54.800><c> they</c>

00:02:54.949 --> 00:02:54.959 align:start position:0%
product is out of business, then they
 

00:02:54.959 --> 00:02:56.869 align:start position:0%
product is out of business, then they
may<00:02:55.599><c> raise</c><00:02:55.840><c> the</c><00:02:56.000><c> price,</c><00:02:56.239><c> right?</c><00:02:56.480><c> It's</c><00:02:56.720><c> a</c>

00:02:56.869 --> 00:02:56.879 align:start position:0%
may raise the price, right? It's a
 

00:02:56.879 --> 00:02:58.790 align:start position:0%
may raise the price, right? It's a
different<00:02:57.040><c> way</c><00:02:57.200><c> of</c><00:02:57.680><c> you.</c><00:02:58.080><c> I</c><00:02:58.400><c> expect</c>

00:02:58.790 --> 00:02:58.800 align:start position:0%
different way of you. I expect
 

00:02:58.800 --> 00:03:00.710 align:start position:0%
different way of you. I expect
larger<00:02:59.280><c> companies</c><00:02:59.840><c> to</c><00:03:00.080><c> do</c><00:03:00.319><c> things</c>

00:03:00.710 --> 00:03:00.720 align:start position:0%
larger companies to do things
 

00:03:00.720 --> 00:03:02.390 align:start position:0%
larger companies to do things
differently<00:03:01.200><c> than</c><00:03:01.519><c> smaller</c><00:03:01.920><c> companies.</c><00:03:02.239><c> I</c>

00:03:02.390 --> 00:03:02.400 align:start position:0%
differently than smaller companies. I
 

00:03:02.400 --> 00:03:04.309 align:start position:0%
differently than smaller companies. I
don't<00:03:02.560><c> expect</c><00:03:02.800><c> you</c><00:03:02.959><c> to</c><00:03:03.120><c> just</c><00:03:03.360><c> outright</c><00:03:03.840><c> revise</c>

00:03:04.309 --> 00:03:04.319 align:start position:0%
don't expect you to just outright revise
 

00:03:04.319 --> 00:03:06.149 align:start position:0%
don't expect you to just outright revise
your<00:03:04.560><c> website</c><00:03:04.959><c> and</c><00:03:05.280><c> pretend</c><00:03:05.519><c> that</c><00:03:05.680><c> it</c><00:03:05.920><c> wasn't</c>

00:03:06.149 --> 00:03:06.159 align:start position:0%
your website and pretend that it wasn't
 

00:03:06.159 --> 00:03:07.830 align:start position:0%
your website and pretend that it wasn't
there<00:03:06.319><c> and</c><00:03:06.560><c> gaslight</c><00:03:07.040><c> you.</c><00:03:07.360><c> This</c><00:03:07.519><c> is</c><00:03:07.599><c> the</c><00:03:07.760><c> type</c>

00:03:07.830 --> 00:03:07.840 align:start position:0%
there and gaslight you. This is the type
 

00:03:07.840 --> 00:03:09.190 align:start position:0%
there and gaslight you. This is the type
of<00:03:07.920><c> thing</c><00:03:08.080><c> I</c><00:03:08.239><c> expect</c><00:03:08.480><c> from</c><00:03:08.640><c> a</c><00:03:08.800><c> company</c><00:03:08.959><c> like</c>

00:03:09.190 --> 00:03:09.200 align:start position:0%
of thing I expect from a company like
 

00:03:09.200 --> 00:03:11.430 align:start position:0%
of thing I expect from a company like
DCS.<00:03:09.760><c> DCS</c><00:03:10.239><c> is</c><00:03:10.319><c> a</c><00:03:10.480><c> company</c><00:03:10.640><c> that</c><00:03:10.800><c> sold</c><00:03:11.040><c> horrible</c>

00:03:11.430 --> 00:03:11.440 align:start position:0%
DCS. DCS is a company that sold horrible
 

00:03:11.440 --> 00:03:13.110 align:start position:0%
DCS. DCS is a company that sold horrible
batteries<00:03:11.840><c> and</c><00:03:12.080><c> they</c><00:03:12.239><c> sued</c><00:03:12.640><c> people</c><00:03:12.879><c> who</c>

00:03:13.110 --> 00:03:13.120 align:start position:0%
batteries and they sued people who
 

00:03:13.120 --> 00:03:14.630 align:start position:0%
batteries and they sued people who
pointed<00:03:13.440><c> out</c><00:03:13.599><c> that</c><00:03:13.760><c> their</c><00:03:14.000><c> batteries</c><00:03:14.239><c> were</c><00:03:14.400><c> of</c>

00:03:14.630 --> 00:03:14.640 align:start position:0%
pointed out that their batteries were of
 

00:03:14.640 --> 00:03:16.949 align:start position:0%
pointed out that their batteries were of
low<00:03:14.800><c> quality.</c><00:03:15.519><c> They</c><00:03:15.840><c> had</c><00:03:16.000><c> a</c><00:03:16.239><c> warranty</c><00:03:16.640><c> policy</c>

00:03:16.949 --> 00:03:16.959 align:start position:0%
low quality. They had a warranty policy
 

00:03:16.959 --> 00:03:18.470 align:start position:0%
low quality. They had a warranty policy
on<00:03:17.200><c> their</c><00:03:17.360><c> website.</c><00:03:17.840><c> It</c><00:03:18.080><c> said</c><00:03:18.159><c> that</c><00:03:18.319><c> the</c>

00:03:18.470 --> 00:03:18.480 align:start position:0%
on their website. It said that the
 

00:03:18.480 --> 00:03:19.509 align:start position:0%
on their website. It said that the
battery<00:03:18.720><c> will</c><00:03:18.879><c> be</c><00:03:18.959><c> determined</c><00:03:19.280><c> to</c><00:03:19.440><c> be</c>

00:03:19.509 --> 00:03:19.519 align:start position:0%
battery will be determined to be
 

00:03:19.519 --> 00:03:20.869 align:start position:0%
battery will be determined to be
defective<00:03:19.840><c> if</c><00:03:20.000><c> it</c><00:03:20.159><c> fails</c><00:03:20.319><c> to</c><00:03:20.480><c> deliver</c><00:03:20.720><c> less</c>

00:03:20.869 --> 00:03:20.879 align:start position:0%
defective if it fails to deliver less
 

00:03:20.879 --> 00:03:22.550 align:start position:0%
defective if it fails to deliver less
than<00:03:21.040><c> 80%</c><00:03:21.440><c> of</c><00:03:21.519><c> its</c><00:03:21.760><c> rated</c><00:03:22.000><c> capacity</c><00:03:22.400><c> during</c>

00:03:22.550 --> 00:03:22.560 align:start position:0%
than 80% of its rated capacity during
 

00:03:22.560 --> 00:03:24.710 align:start position:0%
than 80% of its rated capacity during
the<00:03:22.720><c> warranty</c><00:03:23.120><c> period.</c><00:03:23.680><c> Policy</c><00:03:24.080><c> last</c><00:03:24.319><c> updated</c>

00:03:24.710 --> 00:03:24.720 align:start position:0%
the warranty period. Policy last updated
 

00:03:24.720 --> 00:03:27.589 align:start position:0%
the warranty period. Policy last updated
June<00:03:25.040><c> 14th,</c><00:03:25.519><c> 2021.</c><00:03:26.319><c> Then</c><00:03:26.560><c> a</c><00:03:26.720><c> few</c><00:03:26.879><c> years</c><00:03:27.040><c> later,</c>

00:03:27.589 --> 00:03:27.599 align:start position:0%
June 14th, 2021. Then a few years later,
 

00:03:27.599 --> 00:03:30.149 align:start position:0%
June 14th, 2021. Then a few years later,
they<00:03:27.840><c> changed</c><00:03:28.159><c> it</c><00:03:28.319><c> to</c><00:03:28.480><c> be</c><00:03:28.879><c> 70%</c><00:03:29.519><c> of</c><00:03:29.680><c> the</c><00:03:29.840><c> rated</c>

00:03:30.149 --> 00:03:30.159 align:start position:0%
they changed it to be 70% of the rated
 

00:03:30.159 --> 00:03:32.390 align:start position:0%
they changed it to be 70% of the rated
capacity.<00:03:31.040><c> And</c><00:03:31.200><c> it</c><00:03:31.360><c> still</c><00:03:31.519><c> says</c><00:03:31.760><c> policy</c><00:03:32.159><c> last</c>

00:03:32.390 --> 00:03:32.400 align:start position:0%
capacity. And it still says policy last
 

00:03:32.400 --> 00:03:34.470 align:start position:0%
capacity. And it still says policy last
updated<00:03:32.879><c> June</c><00:03:33.120><c> of</c><00:03:33.280><c> 2021.</c><00:03:34.000><c> So</c><00:03:34.159><c> what</c><00:03:34.319><c> they're</c>

00:03:34.470 --> 00:03:34.480 align:start position:0%
updated June of 2021. So what they're
 

00:03:34.480 --> 00:03:35.910 align:start position:0%
updated June of 2021. So what they're
doing<00:03:34.560><c> is</c><00:03:34.720><c> they're</c><00:03:34.959><c> gaslighting</c><00:03:35.360><c> you.</c><00:03:35.599><c> If</c><00:03:35.760><c> you</c>

00:03:35.910 --> 00:03:35.920 align:start position:0%
doing is they're gaslighting you. If you
 

00:03:35.920 --> 00:03:37.430 align:start position:0%
doing is they're gaslighting you. If you
went<00:03:36.080><c> back</c><00:03:36.159><c> to</c><00:03:36.319><c> that</c><00:03:36.480><c> page</c><00:03:36.640><c> on</c><00:03:36.879><c> their</c><00:03:37.040><c> website,</c>

00:03:37.430 --> 00:03:37.440 align:start position:0%
went back to that page on their website,
 

00:03:37.440 --> 00:03:39.190 align:start position:0%
went back to that page on their website,
you<00:03:37.599><c> may</c><00:03:37.760><c> think,</c><00:03:37.920><c> "Oh,</c><00:03:38.159><c> I</c><00:03:38.319><c> guess</c><00:03:38.400><c> it</c><00:03:38.640><c> was</c><00:03:38.720><c> 70%</c>

00:03:39.190 --> 00:03:39.200 align:start position:0%
you may think, "Oh, I guess it was 70%
 

00:03:39.200 --> 00:03:40.550 align:start position:0%
you may think, "Oh, I guess it was 70%
all<00:03:39.440><c> along.</c><00:03:39.760><c> They're</c><00:03:39.920><c> not</c><00:03:40.080><c> screwing</c><00:03:40.319><c> me</c><00:03:40.400><c> if</c>

00:03:40.550 --> 00:03:40.560 align:start position:0%
all along. They're not screwing me if
 

00:03:40.560 --> 00:03:41.589 align:start position:0%
all along. They're not screwing me if
they're<00:03:40.720><c> refusing</c><00:03:40.959><c> to</c><00:03:41.120><c> cover</c><00:03:41.200><c> it</c><00:03:41.360><c> under</c>

00:03:41.589 --> 00:03:41.599 align:start position:0%
they're refusing to cover it under
 

00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:43.589 align:start position:0%
they're refusing to cover it under
warranty."<00:03:42.080><c> When</c><00:03:42.239><c> in</c><00:03:42.480><c> reality,</c><00:03:43.200><c> they</c><00:03:43.440><c> are</c>

00:03:43.589 --> 00:03:43.599 align:start position:0%
warranty." When in reality, they are
 

00:03:43.599 --> 00:03:45.430 align:start position:0%
warranty." When in reality, they are
screwing<00:03:43.920><c> you</c><00:03:44.159><c> because</c><00:03:44.400><c> they</c><00:03:44.640><c> changed</c><00:03:44.879><c> it.</c>

00:03:45.430 --> 00:03:45.440 align:start position:0%
screwing you because they changed it.
 

00:03:45.440 --> 00:03:47.430 align:start position:0%
screwing you because they changed it.
This<00:03:45.599><c> is</c><00:03:45.680><c> what</c><00:03:45.920><c> Microsoft</c><00:03:46.400><c> did</c><00:03:46.560><c> over</c><00:03:46.720><c> here.</c><00:03:47.200><c> It</c>

00:03:47.430 --> 00:03:47.440 align:start position:0%
This is what Microsoft did over here. It
 

00:03:47.440 --> 00:03:49.910 align:start position:0%
This is what Microsoft did over here. It
doesn't<00:03:47.599><c> say</c><00:03:47.920><c> updated,</c><00:03:48.799><c> right?</c><00:03:49.040><c> It</c><00:03:49.280><c> doesn't</c>

00:03:49.910 --> 00:03:49.920 align:start position:0%
doesn't say updated, right? It doesn't
 

00:03:49.920 --> 00:03:52.070 align:start position:0%
doesn't say updated, right? It doesn't
They<00:03:50.159><c> just</c><00:03:50.319><c> took</c><00:03:50.560><c> the</c><00:03:50.799><c> exact</c><00:03:51.120><c> same</c><00:03:51.360><c> page</c><00:03:51.760><c> where</c>

00:03:52.070 --> 00:03:52.080 align:start position:0%
They just took the exact same page where
 

00:03:52.080 --> 00:03:54.149 align:start position:0%
They just took the exact same page where
it<00:03:52.239><c> said,</c><00:03:52.560><c> "Rest</c><00:03:53.040><c> assured</c><00:03:53.440><c> that</c><00:03:53.680><c> your</c><00:03:53.840><c> Office</c>

00:03:54.149 --> 00:03:54.159 align:start position:0%
it said, "Rest assured that your Office
 

00:03:54.159 --> 00:03:56.470 align:start position:0%
it said, "Rest assured that your Office
apps<00:03:54.480><c> will</c><00:03:54.720><c> continue</c><00:03:54.959><c> to</c><00:03:55.200><c> function."</c><00:03:56.159><c> They</c>

00:03:56.470 --> 00:03:56.480 align:start position:0%
apps will continue to function." They
 

00:03:56.480 --> 00:03:58.949 align:start position:0%
apps will continue to function." They
 changed<00:03:57.360><c> it</c><00:03:58.000><c> and</c><00:03:58.319><c> now</c><00:03:58.480><c> it</c><00:03:58.720><c> doesn't</c>

00:03:58.949 --> 00:03:58.959 align:start position:0%
 changed it and now it doesn't
 

00:03:58.959 --> 00:04:01.429 align:start position:0%
 changed it and now it doesn't
say<00:03:59.200><c> it'll</c><00:03:59.599><c> function</c><00:04:00.319><c> and</c><00:04:00.640><c> it</c><00:04:00.879><c> says</c><00:04:01.040><c> that</c><00:04:01.200><c> you</c>

00:04:01.429 --> 00:04:01.439 align:start position:0%
say it'll function and it says that you
 

00:04:01.439 --> 00:04:05.190 align:start position:0%
say it'll function and it says that you
won't<00:04:01.599><c> be</c><00:04:01.760><c> able</c><00:04:02.000><c> to</c><00:04:02.480><c> make</c><00:04:03.120><c> like</c>

00:04:05.190 --> 00:04:05.200 align:start position:0%
won't be able to make like
 

00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:07.110 align:start position:0%
won't be able to make like
that's<00:04:05.519><c> not</c><00:04:05.760><c> how</c><00:04:06.000><c> you</c><00:04:06.239><c> expect</c><00:04:06.480><c> a</c><00:04:06.720><c> big</c><00:04:06.879><c> company</c>

00:04:07.110 --> 00:04:07.120 align:start position:0%
that's not how you expect a big company
 

00:04:07.120 --> 00:04:08.869 align:start position:0%
that's not how you expect a big company
to<00:04:07.519><c> you</c><00:04:07.680><c> over.</c><00:04:08.000><c> The</c><00:04:08.239><c> big</c><00:04:08.400><c> company</c><00:04:08.640><c> is</c>

00:04:08.869 --> 00:04:08.879 align:start position:0%
to you over. The big company is
 

00:04:08.879 --> 00:04:10.710 align:start position:0%
to you over. The big company is
supposed<00:04:09.040><c> to</c><00:04:09.200><c> put</c><00:04:09.360><c> on</c><00:04:09.439><c> a</c><00:04:09.599><c> suit,</c><00:04:10.000><c> dress</c><00:04:10.239><c> it</c><00:04:10.400><c> up</c><00:04:10.480><c> a</c>

00:04:10.710 --> 00:04:10.720 align:start position:0%
supposed to put on a suit, dress it up a
 

00:04:10.720 --> 00:04:12.229 align:start position:0%
supposed to put on a suit, dress it up a
little<00:04:10.799><c> bit,</c><00:04:11.040><c> have</c><00:04:11.200><c> an</c><00:04:11.360><c> enduser</c><00:04:11.920><c> license</c>

00:04:12.229 --> 00:04:12.239 align:start position:0%
little bit, have an enduser license
 

00:04:12.239 --> 00:04:13.910 align:start position:0%
little bit, have an enduser license
agreement<00:04:12.560><c> where</c><00:04:12.720><c> on</c><00:04:12.879><c> page</c><00:04:13.120><c> 89</c><00:04:13.439><c> it</c><00:04:13.599><c> says</c><00:04:13.760><c> they</c>

00:04:13.910 --> 00:04:13.920 align:start position:0%
agreement where on page 89 it says they
 

00:04:13.920 --> 00:04:15.110 align:start position:0%
agreement where on page 89 it says they
can<00:04:14.000><c> change</c><00:04:14.159><c> the</c><00:04:14.319><c> terms</c><00:04:14.480><c> of</c><00:04:14.560><c> the</c><00:04:14.720><c> sale</c><00:04:14.879><c> after</c>

00:04:15.110 --> 00:04:15.120 align:start position:0%
can change the terms of the sale after
 

00:04:15.120 --> 00:04:16.550 align:start position:0%
can change the terms of the sale after
the<00:04:15.280><c> sale</c><00:04:15.680><c> and</c><00:04:15.840><c> then</c><00:04:16.000><c> say</c><00:04:16.239><c> we're</c><00:04:16.400><c> not</c>

00:04:16.550 --> 00:04:16.560 align:start position:0%
the sale and then say we're not
 

00:04:16.560 --> 00:04:17.909 align:start position:0%
the sale and then say we're not
supported.<00:04:17.199><c> That's</c><00:04:17.440><c> the</c><00:04:17.600><c> way</c><00:04:17.680><c> they're</c>

00:04:17.909 --> 00:04:17.919 align:start position:0%
supported. That's the way they're
 

00:04:17.919 --> 00:04:19.749 align:start position:0%
supported. That's the way they're
supposed<00:04:18.079><c> to</c><00:04:18.239><c> do</c><00:04:18.320><c> it,</c><00:04:18.560><c> right?</c><00:04:19.120><c> They</c><00:04:19.359><c> do</c><00:04:19.440><c> it</c><00:04:19.600><c> in</c>

00:04:19.749 --> 00:04:19.759 align:start position:0%
supposed to do it, right? They do it in
 

00:04:19.759 --> 00:04:21.749 align:start position:0%
supposed to do it, right? They do it in
a<00:04:20.000><c> more</c><00:04:20.400><c> dressed</c><00:04:20.720><c> up</c><00:04:20.880><c> way.</c><00:04:21.199><c> They</c><00:04:21.359><c> don't</c><00:04:21.600><c> not</c>

00:04:21.749 --> 00:04:21.759 align:start position:0%
a more dressed up way. They don't not
 

00:04:21.759 --> 00:04:23.350 align:start position:0%
a more dressed up way. They don't not
supposed<00:04:22.000><c> to</c><00:04:22.160><c> do</c><00:04:22.240><c> it</c><00:04:22.400><c> in</c><00:04:22.639><c> the</c><00:04:22.880><c> like</c><00:04:23.120><c> the</c>

00:04:23.350 --> 00:04:23.360 align:start position:0%
supposed to do it in the like the
 

00:04:23.360 --> 00:04:25.189 align:start position:0%
supposed to do it in the like the
shanking<00:04:23.680><c> in</c><00:04:23.840><c> an</c><00:04:24.000><c> alleyway.</c><00:04:24.639><c> I'm</c><00:04:24.880><c> not</c><00:04:25.040><c> saying</c>

00:04:25.189 --> 00:04:25.199 align:start position:0%
shanking in an alleyway. I'm not saying
 

00:04:25.199 --> 00:04:26.790 align:start position:0%
shanking in an alleyway. I'm not saying
that<00:04:25.440><c> small</c><00:04:25.759><c> businesses</c><00:04:26.160><c> are</c><00:04:26.400><c> worse</c><00:04:26.639><c> than</c>

00:04:26.790 --> 00:04:26.800 align:start position:0%
that small businesses are worse than
 

00:04:26.800 --> 00:04:28.230 align:start position:0%
that small businesses are worse than
large<00:04:27.040><c> companies.</c><00:04:27.440><c> I'm</c><00:04:27.600><c> just</c><00:04:27.759><c> saying</c><00:04:27.840><c> that</c><00:04:28.080><c> I</c>

00:04:28.230 --> 00:04:28.240 align:start position:0%
large companies. I'm just saying that I
 

00:04:28.240 --> 00:04:29.590 align:start position:0%
large companies. I'm just saying that I
expect<00:04:28.560><c> something</c><00:04:28.800><c> more</c><00:04:29.040><c> from</c><00:04:29.199><c> a</c><00:04:29.440><c> company</c>

00:04:29.590 --> 00:04:29.600 align:start position:0%
expect something more from a company
 

00:04:29.600 --> 00:04:31.189 align:start position:0%
expect something more from a company
worth<00:04:29.840><c> three</c><00:04:30.000><c> or</c><00:04:30.160><c> four</c><00:04:30.320><c> trillion</c><00:04:30.639><c> dollars</c>

00:04:31.189 --> 00:04:31.199 align:start position:0%
worth three or four trillion dollars
 

00:04:31.199 --> 00:04:33.350 align:start position:0%
worth three or four trillion dollars
than<00:04:31.520><c> just</c><00:04:32.240><c> changing</c><00:04:32.639><c> your</c><00:04:32.880><c> website,</c>

00:04:33.350 --> 00:04:33.360 align:start position:0%
than just changing your website,
 

00:04:33.360 --> 00:04:34.550 align:start position:0%
than just changing your website,
pretending<00:04:33.759><c> that</c><00:04:33.919><c> the</c><00:04:34.080><c> change</c><00:04:34.320><c> never</c>

00:04:34.550 --> 00:04:34.560 align:start position:0%
pretending that the change never
 

00:04:34.560 --> 00:04:35.909 align:start position:0%
pretending that the change never
happens,<00:04:34.880><c> and</c><00:04:35.040><c> doing</c><00:04:35.199><c> the</c><00:04:35.360><c> type</c><00:04:35.520><c> of</c><00:04:35.759><c> that</c>

00:04:35.909 --> 00:04:35.919 align:start position:0%
happens, and doing the type of that
 

00:04:35.919 --> 00:04:37.590 align:start position:0%
happens, and doing the type of that
I<00:04:36.080><c> expect</c><00:04:36.240><c> out</c><00:04:36.400><c> of</c><00:04:36.560><c> DCS</c><00:04:36.960><c> batteries.</c><00:04:37.360><c> You'll</c>

00:04:37.590 --> 00:04:37.600 align:start position:0%
I expect out of DCS batteries. You'll
 

00:04:37.600 --> 00:04:38.870 align:start position:0%
I expect out of DCS batteries. You'll
see<00:04:37.680><c> in</c><00:04:37.759><c> the</c><00:04:37.919><c> news</c><00:04:38.000><c> that</c><00:04:38.240><c> entire</c><00:04:38.560><c> countries</c>

00:04:38.870 --> 00:04:38.880 align:start position:0%
see in the news that entire countries
 

00:04:38.880 --> 00:04:39.990 align:start position:0%
see in the news that entire countries
are<00:04:39.040><c> trying</c><00:04:39.199><c> to</c><00:04:39.280><c> move</c><00:04:39.440><c> away</c><00:04:39.600><c> from</c><00:04:39.759><c> using</c>

00:04:39.990 --> 00:04:40.000 align:start position:0%
are trying to move away from using
 

00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:41.430 align:start position:0%
are trying to move away from using
Microsoft<00:04:40.479><c> software</c><00:04:40.800><c> in</c><00:04:40.960><c> Europe.</c><00:04:41.199><c> And</c><00:04:41.280><c> I</c>

00:04:41.430 --> 00:04:41.440 align:start position:0%
Microsoft software in Europe. And I
 

00:04:41.440 --> 00:04:42.710 align:start position:0%
Microsoft software in Europe. And I
don't<00:04:41.520><c> blame</c><00:04:41.759><c> them</c><00:04:41.919><c> when</c><00:04:42.080><c> they</c><00:04:42.240><c> are</c><00:04:42.400><c> pulling</c>

00:04:42.710 --> 00:04:42.720 align:start position:0%
don't blame them when they are pulling
 

00:04:42.720 --> 00:04:44.070 align:start position:0%
don't blame them when they are pulling
stuff<00:04:42.960><c> like</c><00:04:43.120><c> this.</c><00:04:43.440><c> This</c><00:04:43.520><c> is</c><00:04:43.680><c> not</c><00:04:43.840><c> even</c>

00:04:44.070 --> 00:04:44.080 align:start position:0%
stuff like this. This is not even
 

00:04:44.080 --> 00:04:45.590 align:start position:0%
stuff like this. This is not even
professional<00:04:44.479><c> revocation</c><00:04:44.960><c> of</c><00:04:45.120><c> ownership.</c>

00:04:45.590 --> 00:04:45.600 align:start position:0%
professional revocation of ownership.
 

00:04:45.600 --> 00:04:46.870 align:start position:0%
professional revocation of ownership.
This<00:04:45.759><c> is</c><00:04:45.840><c> bush</c><00:04:46.080><c> leak</c><00:04:46.560><c> Let</c><00:04:46.639><c> me</c><00:04:46.720><c> know</c><00:04:46.800><c> what</c>

00:04:46.870 --> 00:04:46.880 align:start position:0%
This is bush leak Let me know what
 

00:04:46.880 --> 00:04:47.830 align:start position:0%
This is bush leak Let me know what
you<00:04:46.960><c> think</c><00:04:47.120><c> in</c><00:04:47.199><c> the</c><00:04:47.360><c> comments</c><00:04:47.520><c> down</c><00:04:47.600><c> below.</c>

00:04:47.830 --> 00:04:47.840 align:start position:0%
you think in the comments down below.
 

00:04:47.840 --> 00:04:50.710 align:start position:0%
you think in the comments down below.
Would<00:04:48.160><c> you</c><00:04:48.320><c> feel</c><00:04:48.800><c> more</c><00:04:49.440><c> morally</c><00:04:49.919><c> justified</c>

00:04:50.710 --> 00:04:50.720 align:start position:0%
Would you feel more morally justified
 

00:04:50.720 --> 00:04:52.550 align:start position:0%
Would you feel more morally justified
pirating<00:04:51.199><c> a</c><00:04:51.360><c> Microsoft</c><00:04:51.840><c> product</c><00:04:52.160><c> when</c><00:04:52.400><c> you</c>

00:04:52.550 --> 00:04:52.560 align:start position:0%
pirating a Microsoft product when you
 

00:04:52.560 --> 00:04:54.550 align:start position:0%
pirating a Microsoft product when you
see<00:04:52.639><c> that</c><00:04:52.960><c> they</c><00:04:53.199><c> have</c><00:04:53.440><c> revoked</c><00:04:53.919><c> ownership</c><00:04:54.320><c> and</c>

00:04:54.550 --> 00:04:54.560 align:start position:0%
see that they have revoked ownership and
 

00:04:54.560 --> 00:04:56.230 align:start position:0%
see that they have revoked ownership and
then<00:04:54.720><c> they've</c><00:04:54.960><c> edited</c><00:04:55.280><c> their</c><00:04:55.520><c> website</c><00:04:56.080><c> so</c>

00:04:56.230 --> 00:04:56.240 align:start position:0%
then they've edited their website so
 

00:04:56.240 --> 00:04:58.150 align:start position:0%
then they've edited their website so
that<00:04:56.720><c> they</c><00:04:56.960><c> just</c><00:04:57.280><c> erased</c><00:04:57.520><c> the</c><00:04:57.600><c> part</c><00:04:57.759><c> where</c><00:04:57.919><c> it</c>

00:04:58.150 --> 00:04:58.160 align:start position:0%
that they just erased the part where it
 

00:04:58.160 --> 00:04:59.749 align:start position:0%
that they just erased the part where it
said<00:04:58.320><c> rest</c><00:04:58.639><c> assured</c><00:04:59.040><c> that</c><00:04:59.280><c> it</c><00:04:59.440><c> will</c><00:04:59.600><c> continue</c>

00:04:59.749 --> 00:04:59.759 align:start position:0%
said rest assured that it will continue
 

00:04:59.759 --> 00:05:00.950 align:start position:0%
said rest assured that it will continue
to<00:04:59.919><c> function.</c><00:05:00.240><c> If</c><00:05:00.400><c> I</c><00:05:00.479><c> had</c><00:05:00.639><c> purchased</c>

00:05:00.950 --> 00:05:00.960 align:start position:0%
to function. If I had purchased
 

00:05:00.960 --> 00:05:03.510 align:start position:0%
to function. If I had purchased
Microsoft<00:05:01.360><c> Office</c><00:05:01.759><c> 2019,</c><00:05:02.479><c> which</c><00:05:02.639><c> I</c><00:05:02.800><c> have</c><00:05:03.040><c> not</c>

00:05:03.510 --> 00:05:03.520 align:start position:0%
Microsoft Office 2019, which I have not
 

00:05:03.520 --> 00:05:05.350 align:start position:0%
Microsoft Office 2019, which I have not
I<00:05:03.680><c> do</c><00:05:03.919><c> not</c><00:05:04.160><c> I</c><00:05:04.320><c> use</c><00:05:04.400><c> Libra</c><00:05:04.800><c> Office</c><00:05:05.040><c> or</c><00:05:05.199><c> Open</c>

00:05:05.350 --> 00:05:05.360 align:start position:0%
I do not I use Libra Office or Open
 

00:05:05.360 --> 00:05:07.189 align:start position:0%
I do not I use Libra Office or Open
Office<00:05:05.600><c> for</c><00:05:05.759><c> free.</c><00:05:06.240><c> But</c><00:05:06.400><c> if</c><00:05:06.560><c> I</c><00:05:06.720><c> had</c><00:05:06.960><c> purchased</c>

00:05:07.189 --> 00:05:07.199 align:start position:0%
Office for free. But if I had purchased
 

00:05:07.199 --> 00:05:09.270 align:start position:0%
Office for free. But if I had purchased
it,<00:05:07.440><c> I</c><00:05:07.600><c> would</c><00:05:07.759><c> feel</c><00:05:08.080><c> absolutely</c><00:05:08.560><c> no</c><00:05:08.800><c> qualms</c>

00:05:09.270 --> 00:05:09.280 align:start position:0%
it, I would feel absolutely no qualms
 

00:05:09.280 --> 00:05:11.189 align:start position:0%
it, I would feel absolutely no qualms
pirating<00:05:09.759><c> the</c><00:05:10.080><c> most</c><00:05:10.240><c> new</c><00:05:10.479><c> version</c><00:05:10.720><c> of</c><00:05:10.960><c> it</c>

00:05:11.189 --> 00:05:11.199 align:start position:0%
pirating the most new version of it
 

00:05:11.199 --> 00:05:13.510 align:start position:0%
pirating the most new version of it
because<00:05:11.520><c> you</c><00:05:11.840><c> literally</c><00:05:12.240><c> lied</c><00:05:12.479><c> to</c><00:05:12.639><c> me</c><00:05:13.120><c> and</c><00:05:13.360><c> you</c>

00:05:13.510 --> 00:05:13.520 align:start position:0%
because you literally lied to me and you
 

00:05:13.520 --> 00:05:15.350 align:start position:0%
because you literally lied to me and you
gaslit<00:05:14.000><c> me</c><00:05:14.160><c> into</c><00:05:14.400><c> believing</c><00:05:14.720><c> that</c><00:05:14.960><c> you</c><00:05:15.199><c> never</c>

00:05:15.350 --> 00:05:15.360 align:start position:0%
gaslit me into believing that you never
 

00:05:15.360 --> 00:05:16.550 align:start position:0%
gaslit me into believing that you never
said<00:05:15.520><c> it</c><00:05:15.759><c> was</c><00:05:15.840><c> going</c><00:05:15.919><c> to</c><00:05:16.000><c> function</c>

00:05:16.550 --> 00:05:16.560 align:start position:0%
said it was going to function
 

00:05:16.560 --> 00:05:18.950 align:start position:0%
said it was going to function
continuously<00:05:17.199><c> all</c><00:05:17.360><c> along.</c><00:05:18.080><c> And</c><00:05:18.320><c> I</c><00:05:18.560><c> think</c><00:05:18.639><c> that</c>

00:05:18.950 --> 00:05:18.960 align:start position:0%
continuously all along. And I think that
 

00:05:18.960 --> 00:05:20.629 align:start position:0%
continuously all along. And I think that
archive.org<00:05:19.759><c> really</c><00:05:19.919><c> deserves</c><00:05:20.160><c> a</c><00:05:20.320><c> shout</c><00:05:20.479><c> out</c>

00:05:20.629 --> 00:05:20.639 align:start position:0%
archive.org really deserves a shout out
 

00:05:20.639 --> 00:05:21.830 align:start position:0%
archive.org really deserves a shout out
here<00:05:20.800><c> for</c><00:05:20.960><c> all</c><00:05:21.120><c> the</c><00:05:21.280><c> times</c><00:05:21.440><c> in</c><00:05:21.600><c> the</c><00:05:21.680><c> channel</c>

00:05:21.830 --> 00:05:21.840 align:start position:0%
here for all the times in the channel
 

00:05:21.840 --> 00:05:23.590 align:start position:0%
here for all the times in the channel
that<00:05:22.000><c> we've</c><00:05:22.240><c> been</c><00:05:22.320><c> able</c><00:05:22.400><c> to</c><00:05:22.560><c> use</c><00:05:22.720><c> archive.org</c>

00:05:23.590 --> 00:05:23.600 align:start position:0%
that we've been able to use archive.org
 

00:05:23.600 --> 00:05:25.430 align:start position:0%
that we've been able to use archive.org
to<00:05:23.840><c> prove</c><00:05:24.080><c> that</c><00:05:24.320><c> a</c><00:05:24.639><c> company,</c><00:05:24.960><c> whether</c><00:05:25.199><c> a</c>

00:05:25.430 --> 00:05:25.440 align:start position:0%
to prove that a company, whether a
 

00:05:25.440 --> 00:05:26.950 align:start position:0%
to prove that a company, whether a
really<00:05:25.600><c> small</c><00:05:25.919><c> company</c><00:05:26.160><c> or</c><00:05:26.400><c> a</c><00:05:26.639><c> multi-t</c>

00:05:26.950 --> 00:05:26.960 align:start position:0%
really small company or a multi-t
 

00:05:26.960 --> 00:05:28.469 align:start position:0%
really small company or a multi-t
trillion<00:05:27.280><c> dollar</c><00:05:27.520><c> company,</c><00:05:28.000><c> has</c><00:05:28.160><c> changed</c><00:05:28.320><c> the</c>

00:05:28.469 --> 00:05:28.479 align:start position:0%
trillion dollar company, has changed the
 

00:05:28.479 --> 00:05:30.150 align:start position:0%
trillion dollar company, has changed the
terms<00:05:28.639><c> of</c><00:05:28.720><c> the</c><00:05:28.880><c> sale</c><00:05:29.039><c> after</c><00:05:29.280><c> the</c><00:05:29.440><c> sale</c><00:05:29.759><c> and</c><00:05:29.919><c> gas</c>

00:05:30.150 --> 00:05:30.160 align:start position:0%
terms of the sale after the sale and gas
 

00:05:30.160 --> 00:05:32.310 align:start position:0%
terms of the sale after the sale and gas
lit<00:05:30.400><c> or</c><00:05:30.639><c> lied</c><00:05:31.039><c> to</c><00:05:31.280><c> their</c><00:05:31.520><c> subscribers</c><00:05:32.080><c> or</c>

00:05:32.310 --> 00:05:32.320 align:start position:0%
lit or lied to their subscribers or
 

00:05:32.320 --> 00:05:34.150 align:start position:0%
lit or lied to their subscribers or
their<00:05:32.560><c> customers.</c><00:05:32.880><c> I</c><00:05:33.039><c> think</c><00:05:33.199><c> archive.org</c><00:05:34.000><c> and</c>

00:05:34.150 --> 00:05:34.160 align:start position:0%
their customers. I think archive.org and
 

00:05:34.160 --> 00:05:35.670 align:start position:0%
their customers. I think archive.org and
the<00:05:34.240><c> web</c><00:05:34.400><c> archive</c><00:05:34.800><c> deserves</c><00:05:35.120><c> a</c><00:05:35.280><c> donation</c><00:05:35.520><c> or</c>

00:05:35.670 --> 00:05:35.680 align:start position:0%
the web archive deserves a donation or
 

00:05:35.680 --> 00:05:37.029 align:start position:0%
the web archive deserves a donation or
at<00:05:35.759><c> the</c><00:05:35.919><c> very</c><00:05:36.080><c> least</c><00:05:36.320><c> recognition</c><00:05:36.720><c> for</c><00:05:36.880><c> the</c>

00:05:37.029 --> 00:05:37.039 align:start position:0%
at the very least recognition for the
 

00:05:37.039 --> 00:05:38.390 align:start position:0%
at the very least recognition for the
great<00:05:37.120><c> work</c><00:05:37.280><c> that</c><00:05:37.440><c> they</c><00:05:37.600><c> do</c><00:05:37.759><c> and</c><00:05:37.919><c> allowing</c><00:05:38.240><c> us</c>

00:05:38.390 --> 00:05:38.400 align:start position:0%
great work that they do and allowing us
 

00:05:38.400 --> 00:05:40.230 align:start position:0%
great work that they do and allowing us
to<00:05:38.560><c> help</c><00:05:38.800><c> hold</c><00:05:39.120><c> companies</c><00:05:39.520><c> accountable.</c><00:05:40.080><c> When</c>

00:05:40.230 --> 00:05:40.240 align:start position:0%
to help hold companies accountable. When
 

00:05:40.240 --> 00:05:42.070 align:start position:0%
to help hold companies accountable. When
you<00:05:40.400><c> see</c><00:05:40.560><c> things</c><00:05:40.800><c> like</c><00:05:40.960><c> this,</c><00:05:41.360><c> please</c><00:05:41.600><c> do</c><00:05:41.840><c> not</c>

00:05:42.070 --> 00:05:42.080 align:start position:0%
you see things like this, please do not
 

00:05:42.080 --> 00:05:43.990 align:start position:0%
you see things like this, please do not
just<00:05:42.240><c> email</c><00:05:42.560><c> me</c><00:05:42.960><c> but</c><00:05:43.280><c> contribute</c><00:05:43.600><c> an</c><00:05:43.840><c> article</c>

00:05:43.990 --> 00:05:44.000 align:start position:0%
just email me but contribute an article
 

00:05:44.000 --> 00:05:45.510 align:start position:0%
just email me but contribute an article
to<00:05:44.160><c> the</c><00:05:44.240><c> consumer</c><00:05:44.560><c> rights</c><00:05:44.800><c> wiki</c><00:05:45.120><c> so</c><00:05:45.280><c> that</c><00:05:45.360><c> we</c>

00:05:45.510 --> 00:05:45.520 align:start position:0%
to the consumer rights wiki so that we
 

00:05:45.520 --> 00:05:46.950 align:start position:0%
to the consumer rights wiki so that we
can<00:05:45.600><c> have</c><00:05:45.680><c> a</c><00:05:45.840><c> written</c><00:05:46.080><c> record</c><00:05:46.320><c> of</c><00:05:46.400><c> it.</c><00:05:46.639><c> I</c><00:05:46.800><c> like</c>

00:05:46.950 --> 00:05:46.960 align:start position:0%
can have a written record of it. I like
 

00:05:46.960 --> 00:05:48.310 align:start position:0%
can have a written record of it. I like
having<00:05:47.120><c> a</c><00:05:47.280><c> written</c><00:05:47.520><c> record</c><00:05:47.759><c> of</c><00:05:47.840><c> it</c><00:05:48.000><c> because</c><00:05:48.160><c> it</c>

00:05:48.310 --> 00:05:48.320 align:start position:0%
having a written record of it because it
 

00:05:48.320 --> 00:05:50.150 align:start position:0%
having a written record of it because it
makes<00:05:48.479><c> it</c><00:05:48.639><c> very</c><00:05:48.800><c> easy</c><00:05:48.960><c> to</c><00:05:49.199><c> update</c><00:05:49.520><c> this</c><00:05:49.840><c> as</c>

00:05:50.150 --> 00:05:50.160 align:start position:0%
makes it very easy to update this as
 

00:05:50.160 --> 00:05:52.150 align:start position:0%
makes it very easy to update this as
things<00:05:50.479><c> change,</c><00:05:50.960><c> if</c><00:05:51.120><c> I</c><00:05:51.280><c> got</c><00:05:51.520><c> anything</c><00:05:51.759><c> wrong,</c>

00:05:52.150 --> 00:05:52.160 align:start position:0%
things change, if I got anything wrong,
 

00:05:52.160 --> 00:05:53.350 align:start position:0%
things change, if I got anything wrong,
if<00:05:52.240><c> there's</c><00:05:52.400><c> a</c><00:05:52.560><c> technical</c><00:05:52.880><c> thing</c><00:05:53.039><c> that</c><00:05:53.199><c> could</c>

00:05:53.350 --> 00:05:53.360 align:start position:0%
if there's a technical thing that could
 

00:05:53.360 --> 00:05:54.950 align:start position:0%
if there's a technical thing that could
be<00:05:53.440><c> made</c><00:05:53.600><c> differently</c><00:05:54.080><c> and</c><00:05:54.320><c> just</c><00:05:54.479><c> so</c><00:05:54.639><c> that</c><00:05:54.800><c> you</c>

00:05:54.950 --> 00:05:54.960 align:start position:0%
be made differently and just so that you
 

00:05:54.960 --> 00:05:55.990 align:start position:0%
be made differently and just so that you
have<00:05:55.039><c> something</c><00:05:55.199><c> that</c><00:05:55.440><c> you</c><00:05:55.600><c> could</c><00:05:55.680><c> share</c><00:05:55.919><c> with</c>

00:05:55.990 --> 00:05:56.000 align:start position:0%
have something that you could share with
 

00:05:56.000 --> 00:05:57.510 align:start position:0%
have something that you could share with
your<00:05:56.160><c> friends</c><00:05:56.479><c> rather</c><00:05:56.720><c> than</c><00:05:56.880><c> a</c><00:05:57.039><c> YouTube</c><00:05:57.280><c> video</c>

00:05:57.510 --> 00:05:57.520 align:start position:0%
your friends rather than a YouTube video
 

00:05:57.520 --> 00:05:58.390 align:start position:0%
your friends rather than a YouTube video
because<00:05:57.680><c> there's</c><00:05:57.840><c> a</c><00:05:58.000><c> lot</c><00:05:58.080><c> of</c><00:05:58.160><c> people</c><00:05:58.240><c> out</c>

00:05:58.390 --> 00:05:58.400 align:start position:0%
because there's a lot of people out
 

00:05:58.400 --> 00:05:59.350 align:start position:0%
because there's a lot of people out
there<00:05:58.479><c> that</c><00:05:58.639><c> just</c><00:05:58.800><c> don't</c><00:05:58.960><c> want</c><00:05:59.039><c> to</c><00:05:59.120><c> listen</c><00:05:59.199><c> to</c>

00:05:59.350 --> 00:05:59.360 align:start position:0%
there that just don't want to listen to
 

00:05:59.360 --> 00:06:01.029 align:start position:0%
there that just don't want to listen to
me<00:05:59.520><c> happen</c><00:05:59.759><c> to</c><00:05:59.840><c> a</c><00:06:00.000><c> camera.</c><00:06:00.320><c> So,</c><00:06:00.560><c> it's</c><00:06:00.720><c> nice</c><00:06:00.880><c> to</c>

00:06:01.029 --> 00:06:01.039 align:start position:0%
me happen to a camera. So, it's nice to
 

00:06:01.039 --> 00:06:02.710 align:start position:0%
me happen to a camera. So, it's nice to
be<00:06:01.120><c> able</c><00:06:01.280><c> to</c><00:06:01.440><c> have</c><00:06:01.759><c> an</c><00:06:02.080><c> article</c><00:06:02.320><c> that</c><00:06:02.560><c> goes</c>

00:06:02.710 --> 00:06:02.720 align:start position:0%
be able to have an article that goes
 

00:06:02.720 --> 00:06:03.830 align:start position:0%
be able to have an article that goes
over<00:06:02.880><c> it.</c><00:06:03.120><c> I'm</c><00:06:03.280><c> going</c><00:06:03.360><c> to</c><00:06:03.440><c> try</c><00:06:03.520><c> to</c><00:06:03.680><c> start</c>

00:06:03.830 --> 00:06:03.840 align:start position:0%
over it. I'm going to try to start
 

00:06:03.840 --> 00:06:05.510 align:start position:0%
over it. I'm going to try to start
including<00:06:04.240><c> snapshots</c><00:06:04.720><c> in</c><00:06:04.880><c> these</c><00:06:05.039><c> articles</c><00:06:05.280><c> to</c>

00:06:05.510 --> 00:06:05.520 align:start position:0%
including snapshots in these articles to
 

00:06:05.520 --> 00:06:06.870 align:start position:0%
including snapshots in these articles to
make<00:06:05.600><c> it</c><00:06:05.759><c> easier</c><00:06:06.000><c> for</c><00:06:06.160><c> people</c><00:06:06.319><c> to</c><00:06:06.479><c> follow</c><00:06:06.639><c> and</c>

00:06:06.870 --> 00:06:06.880 align:start position:0%
make it easier for people to follow and
 

00:06:06.880 --> 00:06:08.870 align:start position:0%
make it easier for people to follow and
see.<00:06:07.360><c> That's</c><00:06:07.520><c> it</c><00:06:07.680><c> for</c><00:06:07.840><c> today</c><00:06:08.080><c> and</c><00:06:08.319><c> as</c><00:06:08.479><c> always,</c>

00:06:08.870 --> 00:06:08.880 align:start position:0%
see. That's it for today and as always,
 

00:06:08.880 --> 00:06:10.230 align:start position:0%
see. That's it for today and as always,
I<00:06:09.039><c> hope</c><00:06:09.199><c> you</c><00:06:09.360><c> learned</c><00:06:09.600><c> something.</c><00:06:09.919><c> I'll</c><00:06:10.080><c> see</c>

00:06:10.230 --> 00:06:10.240 align:start position:0%
I hope you learned something. I'll see
 

00:06:10.240 --> 00:06:12.309 align:start position:0%
I hope you learned something. I'll see
you<00:06:10.319><c> in</c><00:06:10.479><c> the</c><00:06:10.560><c> next</c><00:06:10.720><c> video.</c><00:06:11.199><c> Bye.</c><00:06:11.440><c> Now,</c>

00:06:12.309 --> 00:06:12.319 align:start position:0%
you in the next video. Bye. Now,
 

00:06:12.319 --> 00:06:15.830 align:start position:0%
you in the next video. Bye. Now,
&gt;&gt; we<00:06:12.960><c> also</c><00:06:13.440><c> have</c><00:06:13.759><c> the</c><00:06:14.080><c> duty</c><00:06:14.800><c> not</c><00:06:15.120><c> to</c><00:06:15.360><c> infringe</c>

00:06:15.830 --> 00:06:15.840 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; we also have the duty not to infringe
 

00:06:15.840 --> 00:06:18.390 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; we also have the duty not to infringe
the<00:06:16.160><c> IP</c><00:06:16.639><c> rights</c><00:06:17.039><c> in</c><00:06:17.360><c> the</c><00:06:17.520><c> process.</c><00:06:18.000><c> It</c><00:06:18.160><c> is</c><00:06:18.319><c> in</c>

00:06:18.390 --> 00:06:18.400 align:start position:0%
the IP rights in the process. It is in
 

00:06:18.400 --> 00:06:20.469 align:start position:0%
the IP rights in the process. It is in
fact<00:06:18.560><c> the</c><00:06:18.800><c> manufacturers</c><00:06:19.759><c> who</c><00:06:20.080><c> have</c><00:06:20.240><c> the</c>

00:06:20.469 --> 00:06:20.479 align:start position:0%
fact the manufacturers who have the
 

00:06:20.479 --> 00:06:25.080 align:start position:0%
fact the manufacturers who have the
relevant<00:06:20.880><c> rights,</c><00:06:21.680><c> not</c><00:06:22.080><c> consumers.</c>