WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:05.600 --> 00:00:07.990 align:start position:0%
 
Guess<00:00:05.920><c> what,</c><00:00:06.160><c> guys?</c><00:00:06.720><c> It's</c><00:00:07.040><c> another</c><00:00:07.600><c> Dev</c>

00:00:07.990 --> 00:00:08.000 align:start position:0%
Guess what, guys? It's another Dev
 

00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:10.150 align:start position:0%
Guess what, guys? It's another Dev
monetizes<00:00:08.559><c> his</c><00:00:08.800><c> Twitter</c><00:00:09.040><c> arguments</c><00:00:09.599><c> episode.</c>

00:00:10.150 --> 00:00:10.160 align:start position:0%
monetizes his Twitter arguments episode.
 

00:00:10.160 --> 00:00:11.990 align:start position:0%
monetizes his Twitter arguments episode.
Aren't<00:00:10.480><c> these</c><00:00:10.719><c> the</c><00:00:10.880><c> best</c><00:00:11.120><c> videos</c><00:00:11.360><c> I</c><00:00:11.599><c> make?</c>

00:00:11.990 --> 00:00:12.000 align:start position:0%
Aren't these the best videos I make?
 

00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:13.749 align:start position:0%
Aren't these the best videos I make?
Okay,<00:00:12.240><c> this</c><00:00:12.480><c> might</c><00:00:12.639><c> be</c><00:00:12.719><c> some</c><00:00:12.960><c> goofy</c><00:00:13.280><c> fun,</c><00:00:13.519><c> but</c>

00:00:13.749 --> 00:00:13.759 align:start position:0%
Okay, this might be some goofy fun, but
 

00:00:13.759 --> 00:00:15.589 align:start position:0%
Okay, this might be some goofy fun, but
for<00:00:13.920><c> real,</c><00:00:14.240><c> there</c><00:00:14.400><c> is</c><00:00:14.559><c> an</c><00:00:14.799><c> actual</c><00:00:15.200><c> topic</c>

00:00:15.589 --> 00:00:15.599 align:start position:0%
for real, there is an actual topic
 

00:00:15.599 --> 00:00:17.189 align:start position:0%
for real, there is an actual topic
underneath<00:00:16.000><c> all</c><00:00:16.240><c> the</c><00:00:16.400><c> slop</c><00:00:16.720><c> I</c><00:00:16.880><c> want</c><00:00:16.960><c> to</c><00:00:17.039><c> get</c>

00:00:17.189 --> 00:00:17.199 align:start position:0%
underneath all the slop I want to get
 

00:00:17.199 --> 00:00:19.349 align:start position:0%
underneath all the slop I want to get
at.<00:00:17.520><c> This</c><00:00:17.760><c> time,</c><00:00:18.000><c> the</c><00:00:18.160><c> drama</c><00:00:18.560><c> began</c><00:00:18.880><c> with</c><00:00:19.199><c> me</c>

00:00:19.349 --> 00:00:19.359 align:start position:0%
at. This time, the drama began with me
 

00:00:19.359 --> 00:00:20.630 align:start position:0%
at. This time, the drama began with me
engaging<00:00:19.760><c> in</c><00:00:19.920><c> one</c><00:00:20.080><c> of</c><00:00:20.160><c> my</c><00:00:20.320><c> favorite</c>

00:00:20.630 --> 00:00:20.640 align:start position:0%
engaging in one of my favorite
 

00:00:20.640 --> 00:00:22.710 align:start position:0%
engaging in one of my favorite
low-effort<00:00:21.279><c> pastimes</c><00:00:21.760><c> on</c><00:00:22.000><c> social</c><00:00:22.240><c> media.</c>

00:00:22.710 --> 00:00:22.720 align:start position:0%
low-effort pastimes on social media.
 

00:00:22.720 --> 00:00:25.349 align:start position:0%
low-effort pastimes on social media.
Dunking<00:00:23.199><c> on</c><00:00:23.600><c> Insane</c><00:00:24.160><c> Cope.</c><00:00:24.800><c> The</c><00:00:24.960><c> person</c><00:00:25.119><c> who</c>

00:00:25.349 --> 00:00:25.359 align:start position:0%
Dunking on Insane Cope. The person who
 

00:00:25.359 --> 00:00:27.990 align:start position:0%
Dunking on Insane Cope. The person who
runs<00:00:25.600><c> the</c><00:00:25.840><c> Insane</c><00:00:26.320><c> Cope</c><00:00:26.640><c> account</c><00:00:27.039><c> is</c><00:00:27.439><c> actually</c>

00:00:27.990 --> 00:00:28.000 align:start position:0%
runs the Insane Cope account is actually
 

00:00:28.000 --> 00:00:29.990 align:start position:0%
runs the Insane Cope account is actually
really<00:00:28.320><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:00:28.720><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:00:29.439><c> The</c><00:00:29.679><c> entire</c>

00:00:29.990 --> 00:00:30.000 align:start position:0%
really [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] The entire
 

00:00:30.000 --> 00:00:31.750 align:start position:0%
really [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] The entire
point<00:00:30.160><c> of</c><00:00:30.320><c> the</c><00:00:30.480><c> account</c><00:00:30.800><c> when</c><00:00:31.039><c> it</c><00:00:31.199><c> first</c><00:00:31.359><c> began</c>

00:00:31.750 --> 00:00:31.760 align:start position:0%
point of the account when it first began
 

00:00:31.760 --> 00:00:33.510 align:start position:0%
point of the account when it first began
anyway,<00:00:32.079><c> was</c><00:00:32.320><c> to</c><00:00:32.480><c> repost</c><00:00:32.960><c> people</c><00:00:33.120><c> who</c><00:00:33.360><c> were</c>

00:00:33.510 --> 00:00:33.520 align:start position:0%
anyway, was to repost people who were
 

00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:35.430 align:start position:0%
anyway, was to repost people who were
coping<00:00:33.920><c> on</c><00:00:34.079><c> social</c><00:00:34.399><c> media,</c><00:00:34.800><c> which</c><00:00:35.120><c> can</c><00:00:35.280><c> be</c>

00:00:35.430 --> 00:00:35.440 align:start position:0%
coping on social media, which can be
 

00:00:35.440 --> 00:00:37.030 align:start position:0%
coping on social media, which can be
pretty<00:00:35.680><c> funny,</c><00:00:35.920><c> but</c><00:00:36.160><c> over</c><00:00:36.399><c> time</c><00:00:36.559><c> it</c><00:00:36.719><c> devolved</c>

00:00:37.030 --> 00:00:37.040 align:start position:0%
pretty funny, but over time it devolved
 

00:00:37.040 --> 00:00:39.030 align:start position:0%
pretty funny, but over time it devolved
into<00:00:37.280><c> posting</c><00:00:37.520><c> the</c><00:00:37.680><c> most</c><00:00:37.920><c> partisan</c><00:00:38.399><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c>

00:00:39.030 --> 00:00:39.040 align:start position:0%
into posting the most partisan [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]
 

00:00:39.040 --> 00:00:41.030 align:start position:0%
into posting the most partisan [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]
If<00:00:39.280><c> any</c><00:00:39.600><c> post</c><00:00:39.840><c> is</c><00:00:40.079><c> outside</c><00:00:40.399><c> of</c><00:00:40.480><c> the</c><00:00:40.719><c> very</c>

00:00:41.030 --> 00:00:41.040 align:start position:0%
If any post is outside of the very
 

00:00:41.040 --> 00:00:43.270 align:start position:0%
If any post is outside of the very
narrow<00:00:41.440><c> slice</c><00:00:42.000><c> of</c><00:00:42.239><c> extreme</c><00:00:42.719><c> right-wing</c>

00:00:43.270 --> 00:00:43.280 align:start position:0%
narrow slice of extreme right-wing
 

00:00:43.280 --> 00:00:45.190 align:start position:0%
narrow slice of extreme right-wing
politics<00:00:43.680><c> that</c><00:00:43.920><c> this</c><00:00:44.079><c> guy</c><00:00:44.320><c> finds</c><00:00:44.640><c> acceptable,</c>

00:00:45.190 --> 00:00:45.200 align:start position:0%
politics that this guy finds acceptable,
 

00:00:45.200 --> 00:00:47.190 align:start position:0%
politics that this guy finds acceptable,
he<00:00:45.360><c> will</c><00:00:45.520><c> repost</c><00:00:45.840><c> it</c><00:00:46.000><c> and</c><00:00:46.239><c> call</c><00:00:46.399><c> it</c><00:00:46.559><c> cope,</c><00:00:46.960><c> even</c>

00:00:47.190 --> 00:00:47.200 align:start position:0%
he will repost it and call it cope, even
 

00:00:47.200 --> 00:00:49.270 align:start position:0%
he will repost it and call it cope, even
when<00:00:47.440><c> he's</c><00:00:47.760><c> just</c><00:00:48.000><c> blatantly</c><00:00:48.559><c> wrong.</c><00:00:49.039><c> Which</c><00:00:49.120><c> is</c>

00:00:49.270 --> 00:00:49.280 align:start position:0%
when he's just blatantly wrong. Which is
 

00:00:49.280 --> 00:00:51.110 align:start position:0%
when he's just blatantly wrong. Which is
why<00:00:49.440><c> he's</c><00:00:49.760><c> honestly</c><00:00:50.160><c> really</c><00:00:50.399><c> easy</c><00:00:50.559><c> to</c><00:00:50.719><c> farm.</c>

00:00:51.110 --> 00:00:51.120 align:start position:0%
why he's honestly really easy to farm.
 

00:00:51.120 --> 00:00:53.189 align:start position:0%
why he's honestly really easy to farm.
Here's<00:00:51.360><c> a</c><00:00:51.440><c> prime</c><00:00:51.680><c> example.</c><00:00:52.160><c> In</c><00:00:52.399><c> the</c><00:00:52.559><c> UK,</c><00:00:52.960><c> a</c>

00:00:53.189 --> 00:00:53.199 align:start position:0%
Here's a prime example. In the UK, a
 

00:00:53.199 --> 00:00:55.270 align:start position:0%
Here's a prime example. In the UK, a
16-year-old<00:00:54.079><c> transgender</c><00:00:54.800><c> girl</c><00:00:55.039><c> named</c>

00:00:55.270 --> 00:00:55.280 align:start position:0%
16-year-old transgender girl named
 

00:00:55.280 --> 00:00:57.350 align:start position:0%
16-year-old transgender girl named
Brianna<00:00:55.840><c> Gay</c><00:00:56.160><c> was</c><00:00:56.399><c> stabbed</c><00:00:56.719><c> to</c><00:00:56.800><c> death</c><00:00:57.039><c> by</c><00:00:57.199><c> her</c>

00:00:57.350 --> 00:00:57.360 align:start position:0%
Brianna Gay was stabbed to death by her
 

00:00:57.360 --> 00:00:58.950 align:start position:0%
Brianna Gay was stabbed to death by her
classmates.<00:00:58.000><c> And</c><00:00:58.160><c> I've</c><00:00:58.399><c> seen</c><00:00:58.640><c> many</c>

00:00:58.950 --> 00:00:58.960 align:start position:0%
classmates. And I've seen many
 

00:00:58.960 --> 00:01:01.029 align:start position:0%
classmates. And I've seen many
right-wingers<00:00:59.600><c> online</c><00:01:00.000><c> mock</c><00:01:00.399><c> her</c><00:01:00.559><c> death.</c>

00:01:01.029 --> 00:01:01.039 align:start position:0%
right-wingers online mock her death.
 

00:01:01.039 --> 00:01:02.630 align:start position:0%
right-wingers online mock her death.
Now,<00:01:01.280><c> you</c><00:01:01.520><c> are</c><00:01:01.680><c> allowed</c><00:01:01.920><c> to</c><00:01:02.000><c> do</c><00:01:02.160><c> that.</c><00:01:02.480><c> That's</c>

00:01:02.630 --> 00:01:02.640 align:start position:0%
Now, you are allowed to do that. That's
 

00:01:02.640 --> 00:01:04.950 align:start position:0%
Now, you are allowed to do that. That's
free<00:01:02.879><c> speech.</c><00:01:03.440><c> It</c><00:01:03.680><c> might</c><00:01:03.840><c> be</c><00:01:04.000><c> rude,</c><00:01:04.320><c> but</c><00:01:04.640><c> rude</c>

00:01:04.950 --> 00:01:04.960 align:start position:0%
free speech. It might be rude, but rude
 

00:01:04.960 --> 00:01:06.789 align:start position:0%
free speech. It might be rude, but rude
speech<00:01:05.280><c> is</c><00:01:05.519><c> still</c><00:01:05.680><c> free</c><00:01:06.000><c> speech.</c><00:01:06.479><c> That's</c><00:01:06.640><c> not</c>

00:01:06.789 --> 00:01:06.799 align:start position:0%
speech is still free speech. That's not
 

00:01:06.799 --> 00:01:08.390 align:start position:0%
speech is still free speech. That's not
what<00:01:06.960><c> I'm</c><00:01:07.040><c> getting</c><00:01:07.200><c> at.</c><00:01:07.520><c> The</c><00:01:07.760><c> argument</c><00:01:08.159><c> here</c>

00:01:08.390 --> 00:01:08.400 align:start position:0%
what I'm getting at. The argument here
 

00:01:08.400 --> 00:01:10.230 align:start position:0%
what I'm getting at. The argument here
is<00:01:08.560><c> that</c><00:01:08.799><c> Insane</c><00:01:09.360><c> Cope</c><00:01:09.760><c> thought</c><00:01:10.000><c> that</c>

00:01:10.230 --> 00:01:10.240 align:start position:0%
is that Insane Cope thought that
 

00:01:10.240 --> 00:01:11.990 align:start position:0%
is that Insane Cope thought that
mourning<00:01:10.720><c> her</c><00:01:10.960><c> death</c><00:01:11.280><c> or</c><00:01:11.520><c> pointing</c><00:01:11.840><c> out</c>

00:01:11.990 --> 00:01:12.000 align:start position:0%
mourning her death or pointing out
 

00:01:12.000 --> 00:01:13.910 align:start position:0%
mourning her death or pointing out
right-wing<00:01:12.479><c> hypocrisy</c><00:01:13.119><c> on</c><00:01:13.360><c> the</c><00:01:13.520><c> topic</c><00:01:13.680><c> of</c>

00:01:13.910 --> 00:01:13.920 align:start position:0%
right-wing hypocrisy on the topic of
 

00:01:13.920 --> 00:01:16.230 align:start position:0%
right-wing hypocrisy on the topic of
mocking<00:01:14.320><c> tragic</c><00:01:14.640><c> deaths</c><00:01:15.119><c> was</c><00:01:15.439><c> cope.</c><00:01:16.000><c> That's</c>

00:01:16.230 --> 00:01:16.240 align:start position:0%
mocking tragic deaths was cope. That's
 

00:01:16.240 --> 00:01:18.310 align:start position:0%
mocking tragic deaths was cope. That's
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;]<00:01:16.560><c> stupid.</c><00:01:17.200><c> It's</c><00:01:17.520><c> very</c><00:01:17.920><c> obvious,</c>

00:01:18.310 --> 00:01:18.320 align:start position:0%
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;] stupid. It's very obvious,
 

00:01:18.320 --> 00:01:19.910 align:start position:0%
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;] stupid. It's very obvious,
looking<00:01:18.560><c> at</c><00:01:18.720><c> this</c><00:01:18.880><c> guy's</c><00:01:19.119><c> account</c><00:01:19.360><c> nowadays,</c>

00:01:19.910 --> 00:01:19.920 align:start position:0%
looking at this guy's account nowadays,
 

00:01:19.920 --> 00:01:21.990 align:start position:0%
looking at this guy's account nowadays,
that<00:01:20.080><c> whatever</c><00:01:20.400><c> he</c><00:01:20.560><c> calls</c><00:01:20.799><c> cope</c><00:01:21.200><c> is</c><00:01:21.520><c> actually</c>

00:01:21.990 --> 00:01:22.000 align:start position:0%
that whatever he calls cope is actually
 

00:01:22.000 --> 00:01:24.070 align:start position:0%
that whatever he calls cope is actually
just<00:01:22.400><c> anything</c><00:01:22.720><c> that</c><00:01:23.040><c> makes</c><00:01:23.280><c> the</c><00:01:23.439><c> left</c><00:01:23.759><c> look</c>

00:01:24.070 --> 00:01:24.080 align:start position:0%
just anything that makes the left look
 

00:01:24.080 --> 00:01:26.310 align:start position:0%
just anything that makes the left look
good<00:01:24.400><c> or</c><00:01:24.640><c> the</c><00:01:24.799><c> right</c><00:01:25.040><c> look</c><00:01:25.280><c> bad.</c><00:01:25.680><c> even</c><00:01:25.920><c> to</c><00:01:26.159><c> the</c>

00:01:26.310 --> 00:01:26.320 align:start position:0%
good or the right look bad. even to the
 

00:01:26.320 --> 00:01:28.310 align:start position:0%
good or the right look bad. even to the
point<00:01:26.479><c> of</c><00:01:26.640><c> unironically</c><00:01:27.439><c> going</c><00:01:27.680><c> to</c><00:01:27.840><c> bat</c><00:01:28.159><c> for</c>

00:01:28.310 --> 00:01:28.320 align:start position:0%
point of unironically going to bat for
 

00:01:28.320 --> 00:01:30.310 align:start position:0%
point of unironically going to bat for
Hitler.<00:01:28.960><c> So</c><00:01:29.200><c> yeah,</c><00:01:29.520><c> he's</c><00:01:29.840><c> actually</c><00:01:30.080><c> really</c>

00:01:30.310 --> 00:01:30.320 align:start position:0%
Hitler. So yeah, he's actually really
 

00:01:30.320 --> 00:01:31.830 align:start position:0%
Hitler. So yeah, he's actually really
great<00:01:30.400><c> to</c><00:01:30.560><c> mess</c><00:01:30.720><c> with</c><00:01:30.880><c> on</c><00:01:31.119><c> Twitter.</c><00:01:31.600><c> Every</c>

00:01:31.830 --> 00:01:31.840 align:start position:0%
great to mess with on Twitter. Every
 

00:01:31.840 --> 00:01:33.590 align:start position:0%
great to mess with on Twitter. Every
time<00:01:32.079><c> I</c><00:01:32.320><c> end</c><00:01:32.479><c> up</c><00:01:32.640><c> getting</c><00:01:32.880><c> more</c><00:01:33.119><c> likes</c><00:01:33.360><c> and</c>

00:01:33.590 --> 00:01:33.600 align:start position:0%
time I end up getting more likes and
 

00:01:33.600 --> 00:01:35.190 align:start position:0%
time I end up getting more likes and
retweets<00:01:34.079><c> than</c><00:01:34.240><c> he</c><00:01:34.479><c> does</c><00:01:34.640><c> on</c><00:01:34.799><c> one</c><00:01:34.960><c> of</c><00:01:35.040><c> his</c>

00:01:35.190 --> 00:01:35.200 align:start position:0%
retweets than he does on one of his
 

00:01:35.200 --> 00:01:36.789 align:start position:0%
retweets than he does on one of his
posts,<00:01:35.600><c> which</c><00:01:35.840><c> does</c><00:01:36.000><c> happen</c><00:01:36.240><c> on</c><00:01:36.400><c> a</c><00:01:36.560><c> regular</c>

00:01:36.789 --> 00:01:36.799 align:start position:0%
posts, which does happen on a regular
 

00:01:36.799 --> 00:01:38.390 align:start position:0%
posts, which does happen on a regular
basis,<00:01:37.280><c> he</c><00:01:37.439><c> ends</c><00:01:37.600><c> up</c><00:01:37.759><c> coming</c><00:01:37.920><c> into</c><00:01:38.159><c> my</c>

00:01:38.390 --> 00:01:38.400 align:start position:0%
basis, he ends up coming into my
 

00:01:38.400 --> 00:01:39.830 align:start position:0%
basis, he ends up coming into my
comments<00:01:38.640><c> and</c><00:01:38.880><c> bitching</c><00:01:39.200><c> me</c><00:01:39.360><c> out</c><00:01:39.520><c> about</c><00:01:39.680><c> it,</c>

00:01:39.830 --> 00:01:39.840 align:start position:0%
comments and bitching me out about it,
 

00:01:39.840 --> 00:01:41.510 align:start position:0%
comments and bitching me out about it,
which<00:01:40.000><c> is</c><00:01:40.159><c> really</c><00:01:40.400><c> funny.</c><00:01:40.720><c> In</c><00:01:40.960><c> case</c><00:01:41.040><c> you</c><00:01:41.280><c> can't</c>

00:01:41.510 --> 00:01:41.520 align:start position:0%
which is really funny. In case you can't
 

00:01:41.520 --> 00:01:43.350 align:start position:0%
which is really funny. In case you can't
tell,<00:01:41.840><c> I'm</c><00:01:42.079><c> not</c><00:01:42.240><c> actually</c><00:01:42.560><c> taking</c><00:01:42.799><c> this</c><00:01:43.119><c> idiot</c>

00:01:43.350 --> 00:01:43.360 align:start position:0%
tell, I'm not actually taking this idiot
 

00:01:43.360 --> 00:01:45.429 align:start position:0%
tell, I'm not actually taking this idiot
all<00:01:43.600><c> that</c><00:01:43.759><c> seriously.</c><00:01:44.479><c> I'm</c><00:01:44.720><c> basically</c><00:01:45.200><c> just</c>

00:01:45.429 --> 00:01:45.439 align:start position:0%
all that seriously. I'm basically just
 

00:01:45.439 --> 00:01:47.270 align:start position:0%
all that seriously. I'm basically just
trolling<00:01:45.840><c> him</c><00:01:46.000><c> for</c><00:01:46.159><c> shits</c><00:01:46.479><c> and</c><00:01:46.560><c> giggles.</c>

00:01:47.270 --> 00:01:47.280 align:start position:0%
trolling him for shits and giggles.
 

00:01:47.280 --> 00:01:48.870 align:start position:0%
trolling him for shits and giggles.
Today's<00:01:47.680><c> story</c><00:01:48.000><c> begins</c><00:01:48.320><c> with</c><00:01:48.479><c> one</c><00:01:48.640><c> such</c>

00:01:48.870 --> 00:01:48.880 align:start position:0%
Today's story begins with one such
 

00:01:48.880 --> 00:01:51.429 align:start position:0%
Today's story begins with one such
event.<00:01:49.520><c> This</c><00:01:49.759><c> anti-trans</c><00:01:50.560><c> guy</c><00:01:50.880><c> said,</c><00:01:51.119><c> "We</c>

00:01:51.429 --> 00:01:51.439 align:start position:0%
event. This anti-trans guy said, "We
 

00:01:51.439 --> 00:01:53.109 align:start position:0%
event. This anti-trans guy said, "We
will<00:01:51.600><c> outlast</c><00:01:52.079><c> you.</c><00:01:52.320><c> You</c><00:01:52.479><c> are</c><00:01:52.640><c> a</c><00:01:52.799><c> small</c>

00:01:53.109 --> 00:01:53.119 align:start position:0%
will outlast you. You are a small
 

00:01:53.119 --> 00:01:54.630 align:start position:0%
will outlast you. You are a small
irrelevant<00:01:53.600><c> fraction</c><00:01:53.840><c> of</c><00:01:54.000><c> the</c><00:01:54.159><c> hobby.</c><00:01:54.479><c> You</c>

00:01:54.630 --> 00:01:54.640 align:start position:0%
irrelevant fraction of the hobby. You
 

00:01:54.640 --> 00:01:55.830 align:start position:0%
irrelevant fraction of the hobby. You
will<00:01:54.799><c> never</c><00:01:54.960><c> be</c><00:01:55.119><c> a</c><00:01:55.280><c> woman.</c><00:01:55.520><c> You</c><00:01:55.680><c> are</c><00:01:55.759><c> a</c>

00:01:55.830 --> 00:01:55.840 align:start position:0%
will never be a woman. You are a
 

00:01:55.840 --> 00:01:57.670 align:start position:0%
will never be a woman. You are a
mentally<00:01:56.320><c> ill</c><00:01:56.479><c> freak.</c><00:01:56.960><c> Now,</c><00:01:57.200><c> this</c><00:01:57.360><c> guy's</c>

00:01:57.670 --> 00:01:57.680 align:start position:0%
mentally ill freak. Now, this guy's
 

00:01:57.680 --> 00:01:59.350 align:start position:0%
mentally ill freak. Now, this guy's
account<00:01:57.920><c> has</c><00:01:58.159><c> actually</c><00:01:58.399><c> been</c><00:01:58.560><c> deleted,</c><00:01:59.040><c> so</c><00:01:59.119><c> I</c>

00:01:59.350 --> 00:01:59.360 align:start position:0%
account has actually been deleted, so I
 

00:01:59.360 --> 00:02:00.550 align:start position:0%
account has actually been deleted, so I
don't<00:01:59.439><c> exactly</c><00:01:59.680><c> know</c><00:01:59.840><c> what</c><00:02:00.000><c> hobby</c><00:02:00.320><c> he's</c>

00:02:00.550 --> 00:02:00.560 align:start position:0%
don't exactly know what hobby he's
 

00:02:00.560 --> 00:02:01.749 align:start position:0%
don't exactly know what hobby he's
referring<00:02:00.799><c> to,</c><00:02:01.040><c> but</c><00:02:01.200><c> I</c><00:02:01.360><c> don't</c><00:02:01.439><c> think</c><00:02:01.600><c> it</c>

00:02:01.749 --> 00:02:01.759 align:start position:0%
referring to, but I don't think it
 

00:02:01.759 --> 00:02:03.590 align:start position:0%
referring to, but I don't think it
matters.<00:02:02.240><c> This</c><00:02:02.479><c> reads</c><00:02:02.719><c> like</c><00:02:02.880><c> an</c><00:02:03.040><c> anti-woke</c>

00:02:03.590 --> 00:02:03.600 align:start position:0%
matters. This reads like an anti-woke
 

00:02:03.600 --> 00:02:04.950 align:start position:0%
matters. This reads like an anti-woke
guy<00:02:03.759><c> who</c><00:02:03.920><c> doesn't</c><00:02:04.079><c> like</c><00:02:04.240><c> the</c><00:02:04.399><c> fact</c><00:02:04.479><c> that</c><00:02:04.640><c> trans</c>

00:02:04.950 --> 00:02:04.960 align:start position:0%
guy who doesn't like the fact that trans
 

00:02:04.960 --> 00:02:06.469 align:start position:0%
guy who doesn't like the fact that trans
people<00:02:05.119><c> are</c><00:02:05.200><c> in</c><00:02:05.360><c> his</c><00:02:05.520><c> hobby,</c><00:02:05.840><c> whatever</c><00:02:06.159><c> hobby</c>

00:02:06.469 --> 00:02:06.479 align:start position:0%
people are in his hobby, whatever hobby
 

00:02:06.479 --> 00:02:08.630 align:start position:0%
people are in his hobby, whatever hobby
that<00:02:06.640><c> is.</c><00:02:06.960><c> The</c><00:02:07.200><c> trans</c><00:02:07.520><c> account</c><00:02:07.840><c> Demon</c><00:02:08.319><c> Fay</c>

00:02:08.630 --> 00:02:08.640 align:start position:0%
that is. The trans account Demon Fay
 

00:02:08.640 --> 00:02:10.790 align:start position:0%
that is. The trans account Demon Fay
Shay<00:02:09.039><c> replied</c><00:02:09.440><c> with,</c><00:02:09.599><c> "I</c><00:02:09.920><c> will</c><00:02:10.000><c> outlive</c><00:02:10.399><c> you."</c>

00:02:10.790 --> 00:02:10.800 align:start position:0%
Shay replied with, "I will outlive you."
 

00:02:10.800 --> 00:02:13.430 align:start position:0%
Shay replied with, "I will outlive you."
Insane<00:02:11.280><c> Cope</c><00:02:11.680><c> reposted</c><00:02:12.239><c> this</c><00:02:12.480><c> claim</c><00:02:12.879><c> as</c><00:02:13.200><c> cope</c>

00:02:13.430 --> 00:02:13.440 align:start position:0%
Insane Cope reposted this claim as cope
 

00:02:13.440 --> 00:02:15.910 align:start position:0%
Insane Cope reposted this claim as cope
on<00:02:13.599><c> his</c><00:02:13.760><c> account.</c><00:02:14.239><c> Then</c><00:02:14.640><c> Insane</c><00:02:15.120><c> Cope</c><00:02:15.520><c> Cope,</c>

00:02:15.910 --> 00:02:15.920 align:start position:0%
on his account. Then Insane Cope Cope,
 

00:02:15.920 --> 00:02:17.110 align:start position:0%
on his account. Then Insane Cope Cope,
another<00:02:16.160><c> account</c><00:02:16.400><c> that</c><00:02:16.560><c> likes</c><00:02:16.720><c> to</c><00:02:16.800><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:02:16.959><c> on</c>

00:02:17.110 --> 00:02:17.120 align:start position:0%
another account that likes to [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] on
 

00:02:17.120 --> 00:02:19.510 align:start position:0%
another account that likes to [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] on
Insane<00:02:17.440><c> Cope,</c><00:02:17.840><c> reposted</c><00:02:18.480><c> this</c><00:02:18.800><c> claim</c><00:02:19.280><c> with</c>

00:02:19.510 --> 00:02:19.520 align:start position:0%
Insane Cope, reposted this claim with
 

00:02:19.520 --> 00:02:21.430 align:start position:0%
Insane Cope, reposted this claim with
the<00:02:19.680><c> message,</c><00:02:20.000><c> "Trans</c><00:02:20.640><c> people</c><00:02:20.959><c> and</c><00:02:21.200><c> their</c>

00:02:21.430 --> 00:02:21.440 align:start position:0%
the message, "Trans people and their
 

00:02:21.440 --> 00:02:23.510 align:start position:0%
the message, "Trans people and their
existence<00:02:22.080><c> will</c><00:02:22.400><c> outlast</c><00:02:22.959><c> your</c><00:02:23.200><c> backwards</c>

00:02:23.510 --> 00:02:23.520 align:start position:0%
existence will outlast your backwards
 

00:02:23.520 --> 00:02:26.070 align:start position:0%
existence will outlast your backwards
and<00:02:23.760><c> idiotic</c><00:02:24.160><c> ideology."</c><00:02:24.959><c> Then</c><00:02:25.280><c> Insane</c><00:02:25.760><c> Cope</c>

00:02:26.070 --> 00:02:26.080 align:start position:0%
and idiotic ideology." Then Insane Cope
 

00:02:26.080 --> 00:02:28.869 align:start position:0%
and idiotic ideology." Then Insane Cope
reposted<00:02:26.800><c> that</c><00:02:27.120><c> post.</c><00:02:27.680><c> And</c><00:02:27.920><c> then</c><00:02:28.160><c> I</c><00:02:28.480><c> finally</c>

00:02:28.869 --> 00:02:28.879 align:start position:0%
reposted that post. And then I finally
 

00:02:28.879 --> 00:02:30.630 align:start position:0%
reposted that post. And then I finally
responded<00:02:29.360><c> with,</c><00:02:29.680><c> "This</c><00:02:30.000><c> is</c><00:02:30.080><c> just</c><00:02:30.319><c> true.</c>

00:02:30.630 --> 00:02:30.640 align:start position:0%
responded with, "This is just true.
 

00:02:30.640 --> 00:02:32.150 align:start position:0%
responded with, "This is just true.
There<00:02:30.879><c> are</c><00:02:31.040><c> historic</c><00:02:31.520><c> records</c><00:02:31.760><c> of</c><00:02:31.920><c> people</c>

00:02:32.150 --> 00:02:32.160 align:start position:0%
There are historic records of people
 

00:02:32.160 --> 00:02:34.150 align:start position:0%
There are historic records of people
having<00:02:32.400><c> what</c><00:02:32.560><c> we</c><00:02:32.720><c> now</c><00:02:32.959><c> call</c><00:02:33.200><c> gender</c><00:02:33.519><c> dysphoria</c>

00:02:34.150 --> 00:02:34.160 align:start position:0%
having what we now call gender dysphoria
 

00:02:34.160 --> 00:02:35.910 align:start position:0%
having what we now call gender dysphoria
thousands<00:02:34.480><c> of</c><00:02:34.640><c> years</c><00:02:34.800><c> ago.</c><00:02:35.280><c> Your</c><00:02:35.440><c> attempts</c><00:02:35.760><c> to</c>

00:02:35.910 --> 00:02:35.920 align:start position:0%
thousands of years ago. Your attempts to
 

00:02:35.920 --> 00:02:38.150 align:start position:0%
thousands of years ago. Your attempts to
wipe<00:02:36.160><c> out</c><00:02:36.480><c> transgenderism</c><00:02:37.519><c> won't</c><00:02:37.840><c> actually</c>

00:02:38.150 --> 00:02:38.160 align:start position:0%
wipe out transgenderism won't actually
 

00:02:38.160 --> 00:02:39.830 align:start position:0%
wipe out transgenderism won't actually
work,<00:02:38.560><c> and</c><00:02:38.800><c> trans</c><00:02:39.120><c> people</c><00:02:39.360><c> will</c><00:02:39.519><c> likely</c>

00:02:39.830 --> 00:02:39.840 align:start position:0%
work, and trans people will likely
 

00:02:39.840 --> 00:02:41.830 align:start position:0%
work, and trans people will likely
continue<00:02:40.080><c> to</c><00:02:40.319><c> exist</c><00:02:40.640><c> as</c><00:02:40.800><c> long</c><00:02:40.959><c> as</c><00:02:41.120><c> humans</c><00:02:41.440><c> do.</c>

00:02:41.830 --> 00:02:41.840 align:start position:0%
continue to exist as long as humans do.
 

00:02:41.840 --> 00:02:43.589 align:start position:0%
continue to exist as long as humans do.
Jesus<00:02:42.160><c> Christ.</c><00:02:42.560><c> This</c><00:02:42.800><c> entire</c><00:02:43.120><c> thing</c><00:02:43.200><c> is</c><00:02:43.440><c> a</c>

00:02:43.589 --> 00:02:43.599 align:start position:0%
Jesus Christ. This entire thing is a
 

00:02:43.599 --> 00:02:45.750 align:start position:0%
Jesus Christ. This entire thing is a
nesting<00:02:44.000><c> doll</c><00:02:44.319><c> of</c><00:02:44.480><c> Twitter</c><00:02:44.800><c> slop.</c><00:02:45.440><c> By</c><00:02:45.680><c> the</c>

00:02:45.750 --> 00:02:45.760 align:start position:0%
nesting doll of Twitter slop. By the
 

00:02:45.760 --> 00:02:47.430 align:start position:0%
nesting doll of Twitter slop. By the
way,<00:02:45.920><c> my</c><00:02:46.160><c> claim</c><00:02:46.480><c> here</c><00:02:46.720><c> is</c><00:02:47.040><c> ultimately</c>

00:02:47.430 --> 00:02:47.440 align:start position:0%
way, my claim here is ultimately
 

00:02:47.440 --> 00:02:49.030 align:start position:0%
way, my claim here is ultimately
correct.<00:02:47.840><c> We've</c><00:02:48.160><c> had</c><00:02:48.319><c> evidence</c><00:02:48.560><c> of</c><00:02:48.720><c> gender</c>

00:02:49.030 --> 00:02:49.040 align:start position:0%
correct. We've had evidence of gender
 

00:02:49.040 --> 00:02:51.110 align:start position:0%
correct. We've had evidence of gender
dysphoria<00:02:49.519><c> in</c><00:02:49.760><c> humans</c><00:02:50.080><c> for</c><00:02:50.319><c> a</c><00:02:50.480><c> very</c><00:02:50.720><c> long</c><00:02:50.959><c> time</c>

00:02:51.110 --> 00:02:51.120 align:start position:0%
dysphoria in humans for a very long time
 

00:02:51.120 --> 00:02:52.630 align:start position:0%
dysphoria in humans for a very long time
now.<00:02:51.519><c> It</c><00:02:51.760><c> doesn't</c><00:02:51.920><c> actually</c><00:02:52.160><c> matter</c><00:02:52.400><c> how</c>

00:02:52.630 --> 00:02:52.640 align:start position:0%
now. It doesn't actually matter how
 

00:02:52.640 --> 00:02:54.390 align:start position:0%
now. It doesn't actually matter how
anti-trans<00:02:53.200><c> a</c><00:02:53.440><c> culture</c><00:02:53.760><c> might</c><00:02:53.920><c> get.</c><00:02:54.239><c> You</c>

00:02:54.390 --> 00:02:54.400 align:start position:0%
anti-trans a culture might get. You
 

00:02:54.400 --> 00:02:56.550 align:start position:0%
anti-trans a culture might get. You
cannot<00:02:54.720><c> actually</c><00:02:55.040><c> wipe</c><00:02:55.360><c> out</c><00:02:55.680><c> trans</c><00:02:56.000><c> people.</c>

00:02:56.550 --> 00:02:56.560 align:start position:0%
cannot actually wipe out trans people.
 

00:02:56.560 --> 00:02:57.990 align:start position:0%
cannot actually wipe out trans people.
Same<00:02:56.720><c> thing</c><00:02:56.800><c> with</c><00:02:57.040><c> gay</c><00:02:57.360><c> people.</c><00:02:57.680><c> You</c><00:02:57.840><c> can</c>

00:02:57.990 --> 00:02:58.000 align:start position:0%
Same thing with gay people. You can
 

00:02:58.000 --> 00:02:59.270 align:start position:0%
Same thing with gay people. You can
suppress<00:02:58.319><c> them,</c><00:02:58.480><c> but</c><00:02:58.720><c> they're</c><00:02:58.959><c> always</c><00:02:59.200><c> going</c>

00:02:59.270 --> 00:02:59.280 align:start position:0%
suppress them, but they're always going
 

00:02:59.280 --> 00:03:01.350 align:start position:0%
suppress them, but they're always going
to<00:02:59.440><c> exist.</c><00:03:00.000><c> One</c><00:03:00.160><c> of</c><00:03:00.239><c> the</c><00:03:00.400><c> replies</c><00:03:00.720><c> to</c><00:03:00.879><c> my</c><00:03:01.120><c> tweet</c>

00:03:01.350 --> 00:03:01.360 align:start position:0%
to exist. One of the replies to my tweet
 

00:03:01.360 --> 00:03:03.270 align:start position:0%
to exist. One of the replies to my tweet
is<00:03:01.599><c> this</c><00:03:01.840><c> guy</c><00:03:02.159><c> saying,</c><00:03:02.560><c> "In</c><00:03:02.800><c> the</c><00:03:02.959><c> future,</c>

00:03:03.270 --> 00:03:03.280 align:start position:0%
is this guy saying, "In the future,
 

00:03:03.280 --> 00:03:05.110 align:start position:0%
is this guy saying, "In the future,
dysphoria<00:03:03.840><c> will</c><00:03:04.000><c> be</c><00:03:04.080><c> cured</c><00:03:04.400><c> with</c><00:03:04.480><c> a</c><00:03:04.640><c> pill</c><00:03:04.879><c> and</c>

00:03:05.110 --> 00:03:05.120 align:start position:0%
dysphoria will be cured with a pill and
 

00:03:05.120 --> 00:03:06.149 align:start position:0%
dysphoria will be cured with a pill and
transitioning<00:03:05.599><c> will</c><00:03:05.760><c> be</c><00:03:05.840><c> viewed</c><00:03:06.080><c> like</c>

00:03:06.149 --> 00:03:06.159 align:start position:0%
transitioning will be viewed like
 

00:03:06.159 --> 00:03:08.229 align:start position:0%
transitioning will be viewed like
labbotoies."<00:03:06.959><c> He</c><00:03:07.200><c> included</c><00:03:07.519><c> a</c><00:03:07.680><c> screen</c><00:03:07.920><c> cap</c><00:03:08.080><c> of</c>

00:03:08.229 --> 00:03:08.239 align:start position:0%
labbotoies." He included a screen cap of
 

00:03:08.239 --> 00:03:09.830 align:start position:0%
labbotoies." He included a screen cap of
a<00:03:08.400><c> very</c><00:03:08.640><c> old</c><00:03:08.879><c> tweet</c><00:03:09.120><c> of</c><00:03:09.200><c> mine</c><00:03:09.440><c> during</c><00:03:09.680><c> the</c>

00:03:09.830 --> 00:03:09.840 align:start position:0%
a very old tweet of mine during the
 

00:03:09.840 --> 00:03:11.509 align:start position:0%
a very old tweet of mine during the
conversion<00:03:10.400><c> therapy</c><00:03:10.720><c> discourse</c><00:03:11.120><c> from</c><00:03:11.280><c> a</c><00:03:11.440><c> few</c>

00:03:11.509 --> 00:03:11.519 align:start position:0%
conversion therapy discourse from a few
 

00:03:11.519 --> 00:03:12.869 align:start position:0%
conversion therapy discourse from a few
years<00:03:11.680><c> ago.</c><00:03:11.920><c> Feel</c><00:03:12.239><c> free</c><00:03:12.400><c> to</c><00:03:12.480><c> go</c><00:03:12.640><c> check</c><00:03:12.800><c> out</c>

00:03:12.869 --> 00:03:12.879 align:start position:0%
years ago. Feel free to go check out
 

00:03:12.879 --> 00:03:13.990 align:start position:0%
years ago. Feel free to go check out
that<00:03:13.120><c> old</c><00:03:13.280><c> video</c><00:03:13.440><c> if</c><00:03:13.599><c> you</c><00:03:13.680><c> want</c><00:03:13.680><c> to</c><00:03:13.760><c> know</c><00:03:13.920><c> what</c>

00:03:13.990 --> 00:03:14.000 align:start position:0%
that old video if you want to know what
 

00:03:14.000 --> 00:03:15.990 align:start position:0%
that old video if you want to know what
he's<00:03:14.159><c> talking</c><00:03:14.319><c> about.</c><00:03:14.720><c> I</c><00:03:14.959><c> replied</c><00:03:15.360><c> with,</c><00:03:15.599><c> "If</c>

00:03:15.990 --> 00:03:16.000 align:start position:0%
he's talking about. I replied with, "If
 

00:03:16.000 --> 00:03:17.910 align:start position:0%
he's talking about. I replied with, "If
this<00:03:16.159><c> future</c><00:03:16.480><c> ever</c><00:03:16.720><c> comes</c><00:03:16.879><c> to</c><00:03:17.040><c> pass,</c><00:03:17.519><c> I</c><00:03:17.760><c> don't</c>

00:03:17.910 --> 00:03:17.920 align:start position:0%
this future ever comes to pass, I don't
 

00:03:17.920 --> 00:03:19.589 align:start position:0%
this future ever comes to pass, I don't
have<00:03:18.159><c> high</c><00:03:18.400><c> hopes</c><00:03:18.720><c> for</c><00:03:18.879><c> it</c><00:03:19.040><c> and</c><00:03:19.200><c> it</c><00:03:19.360><c> won't</c><00:03:19.519><c> come</c>

00:03:19.589 --> 00:03:19.599 align:start position:0%
have high hopes for it and it won't come
 

00:03:19.599 --> 00:03:21.270 align:start position:0%
have high hopes for it and it won't come
to<00:03:19.840><c> pass</c><00:03:20.000><c> in</c><00:03:20.159><c> our</c><00:03:20.400><c> lifetimes."</c><00:03:21.040><c> And</c><00:03:21.200><c> then</c>

00:03:21.270 --> 00:03:21.280 align:start position:0%
to pass in our lifetimes." And then
 

00:03:21.280 --> 00:03:22.949 align:start position:0%
to pass in our lifetimes." And then
another<00:03:21.519><c> guy</c><00:03:21.760><c> said,</c><00:03:21.920><c> "I'd</c><00:03:22.319><c> say</c><00:03:22.480><c> it's</c><00:03:22.640><c> about</c><00:03:22.800><c> as</c>

00:03:22.949 --> 00:03:22.959 align:start position:0%
another guy said, "I'd say it's about as
 

00:03:22.959 --> 00:03:24.550 align:start position:0%
another guy said, "I'd say it's about as
likely<00:03:23.120><c> as</c><00:03:23.200><c> a</c><00:03:23.360><c> man</c><00:03:23.519><c> ever</c><00:03:23.760><c> becoming</c><00:03:24.000><c> a</c><00:03:24.159><c> woman."</c>

00:03:24.550 --> 00:03:24.560 align:start position:0%
likely as a man ever becoming a woman."
 

00:03:24.560 --> 00:03:26.309 align:start position:0%
likely as a man ever becoming a woman."
Basically,<00:03:25.040><c> what's</c><00:03:25.440><c> being</c><00:03:25.680><c> said</c><00:03:25.920><c> here</c><00:03:26.080><c> in</c>

00:03:26.309 --> 00:03:26.319 align:start position:0%
Basically, what's being said here in
 

00:03:26.319 --> 00:03:28.149 align:start position:0%
Basically, what's being said here in
this<00:03:26.560><c> entire</c><00:03:26.879><c> chain</c><00:03:27.120><c> of</c><00:03:27.360><c> conversation</c><00:03:28.000><c> is</c>

00:03:28.149 --> 00:03:28.159 align:start position:0%
this entire chain of conversation is
 

00:03:28.159 --> 00:03:30.309 align:start position:0%
this entire chain of conversation is
that<00:03:28.400><c> gender</c><00:03:28.800><c> dysphoria's</c><00:03:29.519><c> best</c><00:03:30.000><c> known</c>

00:03:30.309 --> 00:03:30.319 align:start position:0%
that gender dysphoria's best known
 

00:03:30.319 --> 00:03:32.309 align:start position:0%
that gender dysphoria's best known
treatment<00:03:30.799><c> is</c><00:03:31.120><c> transitioning.</c><00:03:31.920><c> And</c><00:03:32.080><c> while</c>

00:03:32.309 --> 00:03:32.319 align:start position:0%
treatment is transitioning. And while
 

00:03:32.319 --> 00:03:33.830 align:start position:0%
treatment is transitioning. And while
it's<00:03:32.640><c> possible</c><00:03:33.200><c> that</c><00:03:33.440><c> there</c><00:03:33.599><c> are</c>

00:03:33.830 --> 00:03:33.840 align:start position:0%
it's possible that there are
 

00:03:33.840 --> 00:03:35.509 align:start position:0%
it's possible that there are
undiscovered<00:03:34.400><c> treatments</c><00:03:34.799><c> out</c><00:03:34.959><c> there</c><00:03:35.200><c> that</c>

00:03:35.509 --> 00:03:35.519 align:start position:0%
undiscovered treatments out there that
 

00:03:35.519 --> 00:03:37.830 align:start position:0%
undiscovered treatments out there that
don't<00:03:35.760><c> involve</c><00:03:36.239><c> transitioning,</c><00:03:37.040><c> so</c><00:03:37.280><c> far</c><00:03:37.680><c> our</c>

00:03:37.830 --> 00:03:37.840 align:start position:0%
don't involve transitioning, so far our
 

00:03:37.840 --> 00:03:39.030 align:start position:0%
don't involve transitioning, so far our
efforts<00:03:38.159><c> to</c><00:03:38.319><c> find</c><00:03:38.480><c> them</c><00:03:38.720><c> have</c><00:03:38.959><c> been</c>

00:03:39.030 --> 00:03:39.040 align:start position:0%
efforts to find them have been
 

00:03:39.040 --> 00:03:41.030 align:start position:0%
efforts to find them have been
fruitless.<00:03:39.599><c> and</c><00:03:39.760><c> if</c><00:03:40.000><c> they</c><00:03:40.159><c> do</c><00:03:40.319><c> exist,</c><00:03:40.799><c> I</c>

00:03:41.030 --> 00:03:41.040 align:start position:0%
fruitless. and if they do exist, I
 

00:03:41.040 --> 00:03:42.470 align:start position:0%
fruitless. and if they do exist, I
personally<00:03:41.519><c> don't</c><00:03:41.760><c> think</c><00:03:41.920><c> they'll</c><00:03:42.159><c> be</c><00:03:42.319><c> found</c>

00:03:42.470 --> 00:03:42.480 align:start position:0%
personally don't think they'll be found
 

00:03:42.480 --> 00:03:44.390 align:start position:0%
personally don't think they'll be found
within<00:03:42.720><c> our</c><00:03:42.879><c> lifetimes.</c><00:03:43.519><c> And</c><00:03:43.680><c> then</c><00:03:43.920><c> this</c><00:03:44.080><c> dude</c>

00:03:44.390 --> 00:03:44.400 align:start position:0%
within our lifetimes. And then this dude
 

00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:46.630 align:start position:0%
within our lifetimes. And then this dude
makes<00:03:44.560><c> a</c><00:03:44.720><c> glib</c><00:03:45.120><c> remark</c><00:03:45.440><c> about</c><00:03:45.840><c> her</c><00:03:46.080><c> dur</c><00:03:46.400><c> men</c>

00:03:46.630 --> 00:03:46.640 align:start position:0%
makes a glib remark about her dur men
 

00:03:46.640 --> 00:03:48.070 align:start position:0%
makes a glib remark about her dur men
can't<00:03:46.879><c> be</c><00:03:47.040><c> women,</c><00:03:47.360><c> which</c><00:03:47.599><c> isn't</c><00:03:47.840><c> really</c>

00:03:48.070 --> 00:03:48.080 align:start position:0%
can't be women, which isn't really
 

00:03:48.080 --> 00:03:49.190 align:start position:0%
can't be women, which isn't really
responding<00:03:48.400><c> to</c><00:03:48.560><c> anything</c><00:03:48.799><c> that's</c><00:03:49.040><c> being</c>

00:03:49.190 --> 00:03:49.200 align:start position:0%
responding to anything that's being
 

00:03:49.200 --> 00:03:50.949 align:start position:0%
responding to anything that's being
said.<00:03:49.599><c> So,</c><00:03:49.840><c> this</c><00:03:50.000><c> is</c><00:03:50.159><c> when</c><00:03:50.319><c> I</c><00:03:50.480><c> responded</c><00:03:50.799><c> with</c>

00:03:50.949 --> 00:03:50.959 align:start position:0%
said. So, this is when I responded with
 

00:03:50.959 --> 00:03:53.110 align:start position:0%
said. So, this is when I responded with
the<00:03:51.120><c> tweet</c><00:03:51.280><c> that</c><00:03:51.440><c> pissed</c><00:03:51.840><c> everyone</c><00:03:52.319><c> off.</c><00:03:52.799><c> I</c>

00:03:53.110 --> 00:03:53.120 align:start position:0%
the tweet that pissed everyone off. I
 

00:03:53.120 --> 00:03:55.110 align:start position:0%
the tweet that pissed everyone off. I
posted,<00:03:53.519><c> "Nobody</c><00:03:54.159><c> reasonable</c><00:03:54.799><c> actually</c>

00:03:55.110 --> 00:03:55.120 align:start position:0%
posted, "Nobody reasonable actually
 

00:03:55.120 --> 00:03:57.429 align:start position:0%
posted, "Nobody reasonable actually
thinks<00:03:55.360><c> that</c><00:03:55.680><c> trans</c><00:03:56.000><c> women</c><00:03:56.319><c> metamorphos</c><00:03:57.120><c> into</c>

00:03:57.429 --> 00:03:57.439 align:start position:0%
thinks that trans women metamorphos into
 

00:03:57.439 --> 00:03:59.990 align:start position:0%
thinks that trans women metamorphos into
biological<00:03:58.080><c> females.</c><00:03:58.799><c> The</c><00:03:59.040><c> ask</c><00:03:59.360><c> is</c><00:03:59.599><c> not</c>

00:03:59.990 --> 00:04:00.000 align:start position:0%
biological females. The ask is not
 

00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:01.589 align:start position:0%
biological females. The ask is not
believe<00:04:00.239><c> that</c><00:04:00.480><c> men</c><00:04:00.640><c> are</c><00:04:00.879><c> women.</c><00:04:01.200><c> It's</c><00:04:01.439><c> don't</c>

00:04:01.589 --> 00:04:01.599 align:start position:0%
believe that men are women. It's don't
 

00:04:01.599 --> 00:04:03.429 align:start position:0%
believe that men are women. It's don't
be<00:04:01.760><c> an</c><00:04:01.920><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:04:02.480><c> You</c><00:04:02.640><c> don't</c><00:04:02.799><c> have</c><00:04:02.959><c> to</c><00:04:03.120><c> like</c>

00:04:03.429 --> 00:04:03.439 align:start position:0%
be an [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] You don't have to like
 

00:04:03.439 --> 00:04:05.190 align:start position:0%
be an [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] You don't have to like
trans<00:04:03.840><c> people.</c><00:04:04.239><c> You</c><00:04:04.400><c> do</c><00:04:04.640><c> have</c><00:04:04.720><c> to</c><00:04:04.879><c> leave</c><00:04:05.040><c> them</c>

00:04:05.190 --> 00:04:05.200 align:start position:0%
trans people. You do have to leave them
 

00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:06.710 align:start position:0%
trans people. You do have to leave them
alone."<00:04:05.680><c> And</c><00:04:05.840><c> just</c><00:04:05.920><c> so</c><00:04:06.080><c> we're</c><00:04:06.239><c> clear</c><00:04:06.480><c> here,</c>

00:04:06.710 --> 00:04:06.720 align:start position:0%
alone." And just so we're clear here,
 

00:04:06.720 --> 00:04:08.550 align:start position:0%
alone." And just so we're clear here,
I'm<00:04:06.959><c> completely</c><00:04:07.439><c> correct</c><00:04:07.680><c> on</c><00:04:07.840><c> this.</c><00:04:08.239><c> I</c><00:04:08.480><c> might</c>

00:04:08.550 --> 00:04:08.560 align:start position:0%
I'm completely correct on this. I might
 

00:04:08.560 --> 00:04:09.830 align:start position:0%
I'm completely correct on this. I might
have<00:04:08.720><c> received</c><00:04:08.879><c> a</c><00:04:09.040><c> lot</c><00:04:09.120><c> of</c><00:04:09.200><c> blowback,</c><00:04:09.599><c> but</c><00:04:09.760><c> I'm</c>

00:04:09.830 --> 00:04:09.840 align:start position:0%
have received a lot of blowback, but I'm
 

00:04:09.840 --> 00:04:11.509 align:start position:0%
have received a lot of blowback, but I'm
not<00:04:10.000><c> backing</c><00:04:10.239><c> down</c><00:04:10.400><c> from</c><00:04:10.560><c> any</c><00:04:10.720><c> of</c><00:04:10.799><c> it.</c><00:04:11.120><c> I</c><00:04:11.360><c> don't</c>

00:04:11.509 --> 00:04:11.519 align:start position:0%
not backing down from any of it. I don't
 

00:04:11.519 --> 00:04:13.350 align:start position:0%
not backing down from any of it. I don't
care<00:04:11.840><c> how</c><00:04:12.159><c> big</c><00:04:12.319><c> of</c><00:04:12.480><c> a</c><00:04:12.560><c> horde</c><00:04:12.879><c> of</c><00:04:13.040><c> people</c><00:04:13.200><c> showed</c>

00:04:13.350 --> 00:04:13.360 align:start position:0%
care how big of a horde of people showed
 

00:04:13.360 --> 00:04:15.350 align:start position:0%
care how big of a horde of people showed
up<00:04:13.599><c> to</c><00:04:13.760><c> complain.</c><00:04:14.319><c> They're</c><00:04:14.560><c> all</c><00:04:14.799><c> wrong</c><00:04:15.120><c> and</c>

00:04:15.350 --> 00:04:15.360 align:start position:0%
up to complain. They're all wrong and
 

00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:16.949 align:start position:0%
up to complain. They're all wrong and
I'm<00:04:15.599><c> right.</c><00:04:16.079><c> In</c><00:04:16.239><c> fact,</c><00:04:16.479><c> there</c><00:04:16.639><c> were</c><00:04:16.799><c> two</c>

00:04:16.949 --> 00:04:16.959 align:start position:0%
I'm right. In fact, there were two
 

00:04:16.959 --> 00:04:18.629 align:start position:0%
I'm right. In fact, there were two
hordes<00:04:17.280><c> of</c><00:04:17.440><c> people.</c><00:04:17.759><c> The</c><00:04:17.919><c> first</c><00:04:18.079><c> horde</c><00:04:18.400><c> was</c>

00:04:18.629 --> 00:04:18.639 align:start position:0%
hordes of people. The first horde was
 

00:04:18.639 --> 00:04:21.270 align:start position:0%
hordes of people. The first horde was
left-wing,<00:04:19.280><c> deranged</c><00:04:20.079><c> trans</c><00:04:20.479><c> activists</c><00:04:21.120><c> who</c>

00:04:21.270 --> 00:04:21.280 align:start position:0%
left-wing, deranged trans activists who
 

00:04:21.280 --> 00:04:23.670 align:start position:0%
left-wing, deranged trans activists who
hopped<00:04:21.600><c> in</c><00:04:21.759><c> to</c><00:04:21.840><c> say</c><00:04:22.000><c> that</c><00:04:22.240><c> HRT</c><00:04:22.880><c> does</c><00:04:23.199><c> in</c><00:04:23.360><c> fact</c>

00:04:23.670 --> 00:04:23.680 align:start position:0%
hopped in to say that HRT does in fact
 

00:04:23.680 --> 00:04:25.909 align:start position:0%
hopped in to say that HRT does in fact
turn<00:04:24.000><c> trans</c><00:04:24.400><c> women</c><00:04:24.639><c> into</c><00:04:24.960><c> biological</c><00:04:25.440><c> females</c>

00:04:25.909 --> 00:04:25.919 align:start position:0%
turn trans women into biological females
 

00:04:25.919 --> 00:04:27.430 align:start position:0%
turn trans women into biological females
and<00:04:26.240><c> saying</c><00:04:26.479><c> anything</c><00:04:26.800><c> otherwise</c><00:04:27.199><c> is</c>

00:04:27.430 --> 00:04:27.440 align:start position:0%
and saying anything otherwise is
 

00:04:27.440 --> 00:04:29.189 align:start position:0%
and saying anything otherwise is
transphobic.<00:04:28.160><c> In</c><00:04:28.400><c> fact,</c><00:04:28.639><c> according</c><00:04:28.880><c> to</c><00:04:29.040><c> this</c>

00:04:29.189 --> 00:04:29.199 align:start position:0%
transphobic. In fact, according to this
 

00:04:29.199 --> 00:04:31.189 align:start position:0%
transphobic. In fact, according to this
crowd,<00:04:29.520><c> if</c><00:04:29.759><c> you</c><00:04:29.840><c> side</c><00:04:30.080><c> with</c><00:04:30.240><c> trans</c><00:04:30.560><c> women</c><00:04:30.800><c> on</c>

00:04:31.189 --> 00:04:31.199 align:start position:0%
crowd, if you side with trans women on
 

00:04:31.199 --> 00:04:33.270 align:start position:0%
crowd, if you side with trans women on
every<00:04:31.680><c> reasonable</c><00:04:32.320><c> policy</c><00:04:32.720><c> prescription</c>

00:04:33.270 --> 00:04:33.280 align:start position:0%
every reasonable policy prescription
 

00:04:33.280 --> 00:04:34.469 align:start position:0%
every reasonable policy prescription
with<00:04:33.520><c> regard</c><00:04:33.759><c> to</c><00:04:33.919><c> their</c><00:04:34.080><c> individual</c>

00:04:34.469 --> 00:04:34.479 align:start position:0%
with regard to their individual
 

00:04:34.479 --> 00:04:36.070 align:start position:0%
with regard to their individual
liberties,<00:04:35.120><c> but</c><00:04:35.280><c> you</c><00:04:35.440><c> refuse</c><00:04:35.680><c> to</c><00:04:35.919><c> believe</c>

00:04:36.070 --> 00:04:36.080 align:start position:0%
liberties, but you refuse to believe
 

00:04:36.080 --> 00:04:38.070 align:start position:0%
liberties, but you refuse to believe
they<00:04:36.400><c> become</c><00:04:36.720><c> female,</c><00:04:37.280><c> then</c><00:04:37.440><c> you're</c><00:04:37.680><c> exactly</c>

00:04:38.070 --> 00:04:38.080 align:start position:0%
they become female, then you're exactly
 

00:04:38.080 --> 00:04:39.990 align:start position:0%
they become female, then you're exactly
the<00:04:38.320><c> same</c><00:04:38.560><c> as</c><00:04:38.800><c> a</c><00:04:38.960><c> bigoted</c><00:04:39.360><c> right-winger</c>

00:04:39.990 --> 00:04:40.000 align:start position:0%
the same as a bigoted right-winger
 

00:04:40.000 --> 00:04:41.189 align:start position:0%
the same as a bigoted right-winger
trying<00:04:40.160><c> to</c><00:04:40.240><c> force</c><00:04:40.560><c> them</c><00:04:40.720><c> back</c><00:04:40.880><c> into</c><00:04:41.040><c> the</c>

00:04:41.189 --> 00:04:41.199 align:start position:0%
trying to force them back into the
 

00:04:41.199 --> 00:04:42.790 align:start position:0%
trying to force them back into the
closet.<00:04:41.840><c> These</c><00:04:42.080><c> people</c><00:04:42.240><c> are</c><00:04:42.479><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c>

00:04:42.790 --> 00:04:42.800 align:start position:0%
closet. These people are [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]
 

00:04:42.800 --> 00:04:44.710 align:start position:0%
closet. These people are [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]
delusional,<00:04:43.360><c> and</c><00:04:43.520><c> they're</c><00:04:43.759><c> actively</c><00:04:44.240><c> toxic</c>

00:04:44.710 --> 00:04:44.720 align:start position:0%
delusional, and they're actively toxic
 

00:04:44.720 --> 00:04:46.550 align:start position:0%
delusional, and they're actively toxic
to<00:04:44.880><c> their</c><00:04:45.120><c> own</c><00:04:45.280><c> civil</c><00:04:45.600><c> rights.</c><00:04:46.160><c> The</c><00:04:46.400><c> second</c>

00:04:46.550 --> 00:04:46.560 align:start position:0%
to their own civil rights. The second
 

00:04:46.560 --> 00:04:48.550 align:start position:0%
to their own civil rights. The second
horde<00:04:46.880><c> was</c><00:04:47.040><c> right-wing,</c><00:04:47.600><c> legitimate</c><00:04:48.160><c> bigots</c>

00:04:48.550 --> 00:04:48.560 align:start position:0%
horde was right-wing, legitimate bigots
 

00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:50.790 align:start position:0%
horde was right-wing, legitimate bigots
who<00:04:48.880><c> really</c><00:04:49.120><c> do</c><00:04:49.440><c> just</c><00:04:49.680><c> lack</c><00:04:50.000><c> the</c><00:04:50.160><c> brain</c><00:04:50.479><c> power</c>

00:04:50.790 --> 00:04:50.800 align:start position:0%
who really do just lack the brain power
 

00:04:50.800 --> 00:04:52.550 align:start position:0%
who really do just lack the brain power
to<00:04:51.120><c> actually</c><00:04:51.440><c> engage</c><00:04:51.840><c> with</c><00:04:52.000><c> the</c><00:04:52.160><c> conversation</c>

00:04:52.550 --> 00:04:52.560 align:start position:0%
to actually engage with the conversation
 

00:04:52.560 --> 00:04:54.230 align:start position:0%
to actually engage with the conversation
in<00:04:52.720><c> a</c><00:04:52.880><c> meaningful</c><00:04:53.199><c> way.</c><00:04:53.600><c> Screaming</c><00:04:53.919><c> about</c><00:04:54.080><c> how</c>

00:04:54.230 --> 00:04:54.240 align:start position:0%
in a meaningful way. Screaming about how
 

00:04:54.240 --> 00:04:55.670 align:start position:0%
in a meaningful way. Screaming about how
gender<00:04:54.560><c> affirmation</c><00:04:54.960><c> is</c><00:04:55.120><c> just</c><00:04:55.280><c> validating</c>

00:04:55.670 --> 00:04:55.680 align:start position:0%
gender affirmation is just validating
 

00:04:55.680 --> 00:04:57.270 align:start position:0%
gender affirmation is just validating
their<00:04:55.919><c> delusions</c><00:04:56.400><c> and</c><00:04:56.720><c> doesn't</c><00:04:57.040><c> actually</c>

00:04:57.270 --> 00:04:57.280 align:start position:0%
their delusions and doesn't actually
 

00:04:57.280 --> 00:04:58.710 align:start position:0%
their delusions and doesn't actually
help<00:04:57.440><c> with</c><00:04:57.600><c> gender</c><00:04:57.840><c> dysphoria,</c><00:04:58.400><c> even</c><00:04:58.560><c> though</c>

00:04:58.710 --> 00:04:58.720 align:start position:0%
help with gender dysphoria, even though
 

00:04:58.720 --> 00:05:00.390 align:start position:0%
help with gender dysphoria, even though
it<00:04:58.880><c> does.</c><00:04:59.360><c> Screaming</c><00:04:59.680><c> about</c><00:04:59.840><c> how</c><00:05:00.080><c> trans</c>

00:05:00.390 --> 00:05:00.400 align:start position:0%
it does. Screaming about how trans
 

00:05:00.400 --> 00:05:01.990 align:start position:0%
it does. Screaming about how trans
people<00:05:00.639><c> are</c><00:05:00.800><c> actually</c><00:05:01.040><c> just</c><00:05:01.280><c> groomers</c><00:05:01.759><c> and</c>

00:05:01.990 --> 00:05:02.000 align:start position:0%
people are actually just groomers and
 

00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:04.070 align:start position:0%
people are actually just groomers and
child<00:05:02.320><c> rapists</c><00:05:02.880><c> and</c><00:05:03.120><c> fetishists</c><00:05:03.680><c> and</c><00:05:03.840><c> school</c>

00:05:04.070 --> 00:05:04.080 align:start position:0%
child rapists and fetishists and school
 

00:05:04.080 --> 00:05:05.189 align:start position:0%
child rapists and fetishists and school
shooters,<00:05:04.639><c> even</c><00:05:04.800><c> though</c><00:05:04.960><c> this</c><00:05:05.120><c> is</c>

00:05:05.189 --> 00:05:05.199 align:start position:0%
shooters, even though this is
 

00:05:05.199 --> 00:05:07.189 align:start position:0%
shooters, even though this is
overwhelmingly<00:05:05.919><c> not</c><00:05:06.080><c> the</c><00:05:06.240><c> case.</c><00:05:06.800><c> screaming</c>

00:05:07.189 --> 00:05:07.199 align:start position:0%
overwhelmingly not the case. screaming
 

00:05:07.199 --> 00:05:09.670 align:start position:0%
overwhelmingly not the case. screaming
about<00:05:07.360><c> how</c><00:05:07.600><c> the</c><00:05:07.840><c> most</c><00:05:08.160><c> maximal</c><00:05:08.720><c> pro-trans</c>

00:05:09.670 --> 00:05:09.680 align:start position:0%
about how the most maximal pro-trans
 

00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:11.670 align:start position:0%
about how the most maximal pro-trans
radically<00:05:10.080><c> left-wing</c><00:05:10.720><c> position</c><00:05:11.280><c> where</c><00:05:11.440><c> you</c>

00:05:11.670 --> 00:05:11.680 align:start position:0%
radically left-wing position where you
 

00:05:11.680 --> 00:05:13.430 align:start position:0%
radically left-wing position where you
must<00:05:12.000><c> believe</c><00:05:12.320><c> that</c><00:05:12.560><c> trans</c><00:05:12.880><c> women</c><00:05:13.199><c> have</c>

00:05:13.430 --> 00:05:13.440 align:start position:0%
must believe that trans women have
 

00:05:13.440 --> 00:05:15.270 align:start position:0%
must believe that trans women have
transitioned<00:05:14.000><c> so</c><00:05:14.320><c> perfectly</c><00:05:14.720><c> that</c><00:05:14.960><c> they</c><00:05:15.120><c> have</c>

00:05:15.270 --> 00:05:15.280 align:start position:0%
transitioned so perfectly that they have
 

00:05:15.280 --> 00:05:17.110 align:start position:0%
transitioned so perfectly that they have
become<00:05:15.520><c> fully</c><00:05:15.840><c> biologically</c><00:05:16.400><c> female</c><00:05:16.880><c> and</c>

00:05:17.110 --> 00:05:17.120 align:start position:0%
become fully biologically female and
 

00:05:17.120 --> 00:05:18.710 align:start position:0%
become fully biologically female and
there<00:05:17.280><c> is</c><00:05:17.440><c> no</c><00:05:17.759><c> difference</c><00:05:18.080><c> between</c><00:05:18.320><c> them</c><00:05:18.479><c> and</c>

00:05:18.710 --> 00:05:18.720 align:start position:0%
there is no difference between them and
 

00:05:18.720 --> 00:05:20.550 align:start position:0%
there is no difference between them and
sis<00:05:18.960><c> women</c><00:05:19.280><c> is</c><00:05:19.520><c> actually</c><00:05:19.759><c> the</c><00:05:20.000><c> position</c><00:05:20.320><c> that</c>

00:05:20.550 --> 00:05:20.560 align:start position:0%
sis women is actually the position that
 

00:05:20.560 --> 00:05:22.550 align:start position:0%
sis women is actually the position that
all<00:05:20.800><c> trans</c><00:05:21.120><c> women</c><00:05:21.440><c> automatically</c><00:05:22.080><c> believe</c>

00:05:22.550 --> 00:05:22.560 align:start position:0%
all trans women automatically believe
 

00:05:22.560 --> 00:05:24.070 align:start position:0%
all trans women automatically believe
and<00:05:22.800><c> there</c><00:05:22.960><c> is</c><00:05:23.120><c> no</c><00:05:23.360><c> moderates</c><00:05:23.759><c> to</c><00:05:23.840><c> be</c><00:05:23.919><c> found</c>

00:05:24.070 --> 00:05:24.080 align:start position:0%
and there is no moderates to be found
 

00:05:24.080 --> 00:05:25.350 align:start position:0%
and there is no moderates to be found
among<00:05:24.320><c> them</c><00:05:24.560><c> and</c><00:05:24.720><c> then</c><00:05:24.880><c> of</c><00:05:24.960><c> course</c><00:05:25.120><c> there</c><00:05:25.280><c> are</c>

00:05:25.350 --> 00:05:25.360 align:start position:0%
among them and then of course there are
 

00:05:25.360 --> 00:05:26.950 align:start position:0%
among them and then of course there are
a<00:05:25.520><c> few</c><00:05:25.600><c> who</c><00:05:25.840><c> are</c><00:05:25.919><c> claiming</c><00:05:26.160><c> that</c><00:05:26.320><c> I'm</c><00:05:26.479><c> gay</c><00:05:26.720><c> or</c>

00:05:26.950 --> 00:05:26.960 align:start position:0%
a few who are claiming that I'm gay or
 

00:05:26.960 --> 00:05:29.430 align:start position:0%
a few who are claiming that I'm gay or
trans<00:05:27.199><c> myself</c><00:05:27.919><c> both</c><00:05:28.240><c> of</c><00:05:28.400><c> these</c><00:05:28.720><c> two</c><00:05:28.960><c> hordes</c>

00:05:29.430 --> 00:05:29.440 align:start position:0%
trans myself both of these two hordes
 

00:05:29.440 --> 00:05:31.029 align:start position:0%
trans myself both of these two hordes
were<00:05:29.759><c> ultimately</c><00:05:30.080><c> irrational</c><00:05:30.639><c> but</c><00:05:30.880><c> for</c>

00:05:31.029 --> 00:05:31.039 align:start position:0%
were ultimately irrational but for
 

00:05:31.039 --> 00:05:32.629 align:start position:0%
were ultimately irrational but for
different<00:05:31.280><c> reasons</c><00:05:31.759><c> and</c><00:05:31.919><c> we'll</c><00:05:32.160><c> explore</c><00:05:32.400><c> them</c>

00:05:32.629 --> 00:05:32.639 align:start position:0%
different reasons and we'll explore them
 

00:05:32.639 --> 00:05:35.270 align:start position:0%
different reasons and we'll explore them
both<00:05:33.120><c> let's</c><00:05:33.360><c> hone</c><00:05:33.600><c> in</c><00:05:33.840><c> on</c><00:05:34.160><c> one</c><00:05:34.400><c> specific</c><00:05:34.880><c> reply</c>

00:05:35.270 --> 00:05:35.280 align:start position:0%
both let's hone in on one specific reply
 

00:05:35.280 --> 00:05:37.510 align:start position:0%
both let's hone in on one specific reply
from<00:05:35.520><c> the</c><00:05:35.680><c> trans</c><00:05:35.919><c> activist</c><00:05:36.479><c> Crazy</c><00:05:36.800><c> camp</c><00:05:37.280><c> from</c>

00:05:37.510 --> 00:05:37.520 align:start position:0%
from the trans activist Crazy camp from
 

00:05:37.520 --> 00:05:39.670 align:start position:0%
from the trans activist Crazy camp from
Niara<00:05:38.000><c> VT.</c><00:05:38.560><c> What</c><00:05:38.720><c> aspect</c><00:05:39.120><c> when</c><00:05:39.360><c> it</c><00:05:39.440><c> comes</c><00:05:39.600><c> to</c>

00:05:39.670 --> 00:05:39.680 align:start position:0%
Niara VT. What aspect when it comes to
 

00:05:39.680 --> 00:05:41.430 align:start position:0%
Niara VT. What aspect when it comes to
the<00:05:39.840><c> classification</c><00:05:40.320><c> of</c><00:05:40.560><c> biological</c><00:05:41.039><c> female</c>

00:05:41.430 --> 00:05:41.440 align:start position:0%
the classification of biological female
 

00:05:41.440 --> 00:05:43.510 align:start position:0%
the classification of biological female
are<00:05:41.600><c> we</c><00:05:41.759><c> using?</c><00:05:42.160><c> Gameamtes</c><00:05:42.880><c> not</c><00:05:43.120><c> reliable</c>

00:05:43.510 --> 00:05:43.520 align:start position:0%
are we using? Gameamtes not reliable
 

00:05:43.520 --> 00:05:44.629 align:start position:0%
are we using? Gameamtes not reliable
enough<00:05:43.680><c> to</c><00:05:43.840><c> make</c><00:05:44.000><c> this</c><00:05:44.160><c> claim</c><00:05:44.400><c> without</c>

00:05:44.629 --> 00:05:44.639 align:start position:0%
enough to make this claim without
 

00:05:44.639 --> 00:05:46.629 align:start position:0%
enough to make this claim without
excluding<00:05:44.960><c> cis</c><00:05:45.280><c> people?</c><00:05:45.680><c> Chromosomes</c><00:05:46.400><c> not</c>

00:05:46.629 --> 00:05:46.639 align:start position:0%
excluding cis people? Chromosomes not
 

00:05:46.639 --> 00:05:48.710 align:start position:0%
excluding cis people? Chromosomes not
reliable<00:05:46.960><c> enough</c><00:05:47.280><c> either.</c><00:05:47.759><c> HRT</c><00:05:48.320><c> gives</c><00:05:48.560><c> you</c>

00:05:48.710 --> 00:05:48.720 align:start position:0%
reliable enough either. HRT gives you
 

00:05:48.720 --> 00:05:50.230 align:start position:0%
reliable enough either. HRT gives you
changes<00:05:49.199><c> associated</c><00:05:49.680><c> with</c><00:05:49.840><c> the</c><00:05:50.000><c> opposite</c>

00:05:50.230 --> 00:05:50.240 align:start position:0%
changes associated with the opposite
 

00:05:50.240 --> 00:05:52.390 align:start position:0%
changes associated with the opposite
sex.<00:05:50.800><c> Primary</c><00:05:51.280><c> sex</c><00:05:51.520><c> characteristics</c><00:05:52.080><c> can</c><00:05:52.320><c> be</c>

00:05:52.390 --> 00:05:52.400 align:start position:0%
sex. Primary sex characteristics can be
 

00:05:52.400 --> 00:05:53.909 align:start position:0%
sex. Primary sex characteristics can be
adjusted.<00:05:52.960><c> Focusing</c><00:05:53.280><c> on</c><00:05:53.440><c> reproductive</c>

00:05:53.909 --> 00:05:53.919 align:start position:0%
adjusted. Focusing on reproductive
 

00:05:53.919 --> 00:05:55.990 align:start position:0%
adjusted. Focusing on reproductive
organs<00:05:54.240><c> would</c><00:05:54.400><c> exclude</c><00:05:54.720><c> cis</c><00:05:55.039><c> people.</c><00:05:55.440><c> Interex</c>

00:05:55.990 --> 00:05:56.000 align:start position:0%
organs would exclude cis people. Interex
 

00:05:56.000 --> 00:05:57.830 align:start position:0%
organs would exclude cis people. Interex
people<00:05:56.240><c> by</c><00:05:56.479><c> default</c><00:05:56.960><c> break</c><00:05:57.199><c> the</c><00:05:57.440><c> black</c><00:05:57.600><c> and</c>

00:05:57.830 --> 00:05:57.840 align:start position:0%
people by default break the black and
 

00:05:57.840 --> 00:05:59.670 align:start position:0%
people by default break the black and
white<00:05:58.080><c> thinking</c><00:05:58.560><c> and</c><00:05:58.960><c> their</c><00:05:59.199><c> exceptions</c>

00:05:59.670 --> 00:05:59.680 align:start position:0%
white thinking and their exceptions
 

00:05:59.680 --> 00:06:01.430 align:start position:0%
white thinking and their exceptions
doesn't<00:05:59.919><c> really</c><00:06:00.160><c> fly.</c><00:06:00.639><c> Trans</c><00:06:00.960><c> women</c><00:06:01.199><c> are</c>

00:06:01.430 --> 00:06:01.440 align:start position:0%
doesn't really fly. Trans women are
 

00:06:01.440 --> 00:06:03.029 align:start position:0%
doesn't really fly. Trans women are
women.<00:06:01.759><c> We</c><00:06:01.919><c> don't</c><00:06:02.080><c> become</c><00:06:02.400><c> women.</c><00:06:02.720><c> We</c><00:06:02.880><c> may</c>

00:06:03.029 --> 00:06:03.039 align:start position:0%
women. We don't become women. We may
 

00:06:03.039 --> 00:06:04.469 align:start position:0%
women. We don't become women. We may
adjust<00:06:03.360><c> our</c><00:06:03.520><c> appearance</c><00:06:03.919><c> to</c><00:06:04.080><c> match</c><00:06:04.319><c> our</c>

00:06:04.469 --> 00:06:04.479 align:start position:0%
adjust our appearance to match our
 

00:06:04.479 --> 00:06:06.070 align:start position:0%
adjust our appearance to match our
gender<00:06:04.880><c> identity,</c><00:06:05.280><c> but</c><00:06:05.440><c> that</c><00:06:05.680><c> doesn't</c><00:06:05.840><c> mean</c>

00:06:06.070 --> 00:06:06.080 align:start position:0%
gender identity, but that doesn't mean
 

00:06:06.080 --> 00:06:07.670 align:start position:0%
gender identity, but that doesn't mean
we<00:06:06.240><c> weren't</c><00:06:06.639><c> said</c><00:06:06.960><c> gender</c><00:06:07.280><c> before</c>

00:06:07.670 --> 00:06:07.680 align:start position:0%
we weren't said gender before
 

00:06:07.680 --> 00:06:09.909 align:start position:0%
we weren't said gender before
transitioning.<00:06:08.400><c> Also,</c><00:06:08.800><c> being</c><00:06:09.120><c> female</c><00:06:09.600><c> is</c><00:06:09.840><c> not</c>

00:06:09.909 --> 00:06:09.919 align:start position:0%
transitioning. Also, being female is not
 

00:06:09.919 --> 00:06:11.430 align:start position:0%
transitioning. Also, being female is not
a<00:06:10.160><c> requirement</c><00:06:10.479><c> of</c><00:06:10.720><c> being</c><00:06:10.800><c> a</c><00:06:11.039><c> woman.</c>

00:06:11.430 --> 00:06:11.440 align:start position:0%
a requirement of being a woman.
 

00:06:11.440 --> 00:06:13.749 align:start position:0%
a requirement of being a woman.
Biological<00:06:12.080><c> female,</c><00:06:12.560><c> as</c><00:06:12.800><c> if</c><00:06:12.960><c> trans</c><00:06:13.280><c> women</c><00:06:13.520><c> are</c>

00:06:13.749 --> 00:06:13.759 align:start position:0%
Biological female, as if trans women are
 

00:06:13.759 --> 00:06:15.830 align:start position:0%
Biological female, as if trans women are
artificial<00:06:14.240><c> women,</c><00:06:14.560><c> is</c><00:06:14.880><c> also</c><00:06:15.199><c> disgusting</c>

00:06:15.830 --> 00:06:15.840 align:start position:0%
artificial women, is also disgusting
 

00:06:15.840 --> 00:06:17.350 align:start position:0%
artificial women, is also disgusting
transphobic<00:06:16.479><c> language</c><00:06:16.800><c> that</c><00:06:17.039><c> makes</c><00:06:17.199><c> no</c>

00:06:17.350 --> 00:06:17.360 align:start position:0%
transphobic language that makes no
 

00:06:17.360 --> 00:06:19.350 align:start position:0%
transphobic language that makes no
sense.<00:06:17.759><c> Trans</c><00:06:18.080><c> women</c><00:06:18.319><c> are</c><00:06:18.479><c> real</c><00:06:18.639><c> women.</c><00:06:19.039><c> Trans</c>

00:06:19.350 --> 00:06:19.360 align:start position:0%
sense. Trans women are real women. Trans
 

00:06:19.360 --> 00:06:21.350 align:start position:0%
sense. Trans women are real women. Trans
men<00:06:19.520><c> are</c><00:06:19.759><c> real</c><00:06:19.919><c> men.</c><00:06:20.400><c> Now,</c><00:06:20.639><c> there's</c><00:06:20.880><c> a</c><00:06:21.039><c> lot</c><00:06:21.199><c> to</c>

00:06:21.350 --> 00:06:21.360 align:start position:0%
men are real men. Now, there's a lot to
 

00:06:21.360 --> 00:06:22.950 align:start position:0%
men are real men. Now, there's a lot to
go<00:06:21.520><c> over</c><00:06:21.680><c> here,</c><00:06:22.000><c> but</c><00:06:22.240><c> first,</c><00:06:22.560><c> let's</c><00:06:22.800><c> talk</c>

00:06:22.950 --> 00:06:22.960 align:start position:0%
go over here, but first, let's talk
 

00:06:22.960 --> 00:06:25.110 align:start position:0%
go over here, but first, let's talk
about<00:06:23.120><c> who</c><00:06:23.280><c> Niara</c><00:06:23.759><c> is</c><00:06:24.240><c> since</c><00:06:24.479><c> I</c><00:06:24.800><c> don't</c><00:06:24.960><c> think</c>

00:06:25.110 --> 00:06:25.120 align:start position:0%
about who Niara is since I don't think
 

00:06:25.120 --> 00:06:26.230 align:start position:0%
about who Niara is since I don't think
I've<00:06:25.280><c> really</c><00:06:25.520><c> covered</c><00:06:25.680><c> her</c><00:06:25.840><c> on</c><00:06:25.919><c> my</c><00:06:26.080><c> channel</c>

00:06:26.230 --> 00:06:26.240 align:start position:0%
I've really covered her on my channel
 

00:06:26.240 --> 00:06:28.309 align:start position:0%
I've really covered her on my channel
before.<00:06:26.720><c> She's</c><00:06:26.960><c> a</c><00:06:27.120><c> trans</c><00:06:27.360><c> activist</c><00:06:27.840><c> YouTuber</c>

00:06:28.309 --> 00:06:28.319 align:start position:0%
before. She's a trans activist YouTuber
 

00:06:28.319 --> 00:06:29.909 align:start position:0%
before. She's a trans activist YouTuber
with<00:06:28.479><c> a</c><00:06:28.639><c> pretty</c><00:06:28.800><c> sizable</c><00:06:29.199><c> audience</c><00:06:29.520><c> who</c><00:06:29.759><c> is</c>

00:06:29.909 --> 00:06:29.919 align:start position:0%
with a pretty sizable audience who is
 

00:06:29.919 --> 00:06:32.309 align:start position:0%
with a pretty sizable audience who is
politically<00:06:30.560><c> very</c><00:06:30.880><c> far-left.</c><00:06:31.680><c> As</c><00:06:31.919><c> far</c><00:06:32.000><c> as</c><00:06:32.160><c> I</c>

00:06:32.309 --> 00:06:32.319 align:start position:0%
politically very far-left. As far as I
 

00:06:32.319 --> 00:06:34.230 align:start position:0%
politically very far-left. As far as I
can<00:06:32.479><c> tell,</c><00:06:32.720><c> she's</c><00:06:33.039><c> some</c><00:06:33.199><c> type</c><00:06:33.360><c> of</c><00:06:33.520><c> socialist.</c>

00:06:34.230 --> 00:06:34.240 align:start position:0%
can tell, she's some type of socialist.
 

00:06:34.240 --> 00:06:36.469 align:start position:0%
can tell, she's some type of socialist.
Though<00:06:34.400><c> I</c><00:06:34.639><c> cannot</c><00:06:35.039><c> imagine</c><00:06:35.520><c> she</c><00:06:35.759><c> is</c><00:06:35.919><c> so</c><00:06:36.160><c> stupid</c>

00:06:36.469 --> 00:06:36.479 align:start position:0%
Though I cannot imagine she is so stupid
 

00:06:36.479 --> 00:06:38.230 align:start position:0%
Though I cannot imagine she is so stupid
as<00:06:36.720><c> to</c><00:06:36.880><c> be</c><00:06:36.960><c> an</c><00:06:37.120><c> authoritarian</c><00:06:37.759><c> socialist,</c>

00:06:38.230 --> 00:06:38.240 align:start position:0%
as to be an authoritarian socialist,
 

00:06:38.240 --> 00:06:39.990 align:start position:0%
as to be an authoritarian socialist,
like<00:06:38.400><c> a</c><00:06:38.560><c> Marxist</c><00:06:38.880><c> Leninist,</c><00:06:39.360><c> tanky</c><00:06:39.759><c> type</c><00:06:39.919><c> of</c>

00:06:39.990 --> 00:06:40.000 align:start position:0%
like a Marxist Leninist, tanky type of
 

00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:41.670 align:start position:0%
like a Marxist Leninist, tanky type of
socialist,<00:06:40.400><c> a</c><00:06:40.560><c> Soviet</c><00:06:40.800><c> Union</c><00:06:41.039><c> simp.</c><00:06:41.520><c> She</c>

00:06:41.670 --> 00:06:41.680 align:start position:0%
socialist, a Soviet Union simp. She
 

00:06:41.680 --> 00:06:43.430 align:start position:0%
socialist, a Soviet Union simp. She
gives<00:06:41.840><c> off</c><00:06:42.000><c> more</c><00:06:42.160><c> of</c><00:06:42.240><c> an</c><00:06:42.400><c> anarosocialist</c><00:06:43.199><c> vibe</c>

00:06:43.430 --> 00:06:43.440 align:start position:0%
gives off more of an anarosocialist vibe
 

00:06:43.440 --> 00:06:44.950 align:start position:0%
gives off more of an anarosocialist vibe
to<00:06:43.600><c> me</c><00:06:43.759><c> personally.</c><00:06:44.319><c> Not</c><00:06:44.479><c> that</c><00:06:44.639><c> it</c><00:06:44.800><c> matters</c>

00:06:44.950 --> 00:06:44.960 align:start position:0%
to me personally. Not that it matters
 

00:06:44.960 --> 00:06:46.870 align:start position:0%
to me personally. Not that it matters
that<00:06:45.199><c> much</c><00:06:45.520><c> because</c><00:06:45.680><c> the</c><00:06:45.919><c> anarchists</c><00:06:46.560><c> almost</c>

00:06:46.870 --> 00:06:46.880 align:start position:0%
that much because the anarchists almost
 

00:06:46.880 --> 00:06:48.550 align:start position:0%
that much because the anarchists almost
always<00:06:47.199><c> end</c><00:06:47.440><c> up</c><00:06:47.600><c> being</c><00:06:47.840><c> handmaidadens</c><00:06:48.400><c> to</c><00:06:48.479><c> the</c>

00:06:48.550 --> 00:06:48.560 align:start position:0%
always end up being handmaidadens to the
 

00:06:48.560 --> 00:06:49.990 align:start position:0%
always end up being handmaidadens to the
tanks<00:06:48.960><c> when</c><00:06:49.120><c> the</c><00:06:49.199><c> communist</c><00:06:49.520><c> revolution</c>

00:06:49.990 --> 00:06:50.000 align:start position:0%
tanks when the communist revolution
 

00:06:50.000 --> 00:06:51.670 align:start position:0%
tanks when the communist revolution
kicks<00:06:50.160><c> off.</c><00:06:50.400><c> Anyway,</c><00:06:50.880><c> I</c><00:06:51.199><c> first</c><00:06:51.360><c> heard</c><00:06:51.520><c> of</c>

00:06:51.670 --> 00:06:51.680 align:start position:0%
kicks off. Anyway, I first heard of
 

00:06:51.680 --> 00:06:53.510 align:start position:0%
kicks off. Anyway, I first heard of
Niara<00:06:52.160><c> when</c><00:06:52.319><c> she</c><00:06:52.479><c> debated</c><00:06:52.880><c> two</c><00:06:53.120><c> smaller</c>

00:06:53.510 --> 00:06:53.520 align:start position:0%
Niara when she debated two smaller
 

00:06:53.520 --> 00:06:55.590 align:start position:0%
Niara when she debated two smaller
right-wing<00:06:53.919><c> VTubers,</c><00:06:54.560><c> AO</c><00:06:54.880><c> and</c><00:06:54.960><c> Leaflet,</c><00:06:55.440><c> on</c>

00:06:55.590 --> 00:06:55.600 align:start position:0%
right-wing VTubers, AO and Leaflet, on
 

00:06:55.600 --> 00:06:57.670 align:start position:0%
right-wing VTubers, AO and Leaflet, on
trans<00:06:55.919><c> issues.</c><00:06:56.400><c> And</c><00:06:56.560><c> just</c><00:06:56.639><c> to</c><00:06:56.800><c> be</c><00:06:56.960><c> clear,</c><00:06:57.199><c> Nara</c>

00:06:57.670 --> 00:06:57.680 align:start position:0%
trans issues. And just to be clear, Nara
 

00:06:57.680 --> 00:06:59.270 align:start position:0%
trans issues. And just to be clear, Nara
won<00:06:57.919><c> both</c><00:06:58.080><c> of</c><00:06:58.160><c> those</c><00:06:58.319><c> debates.</c><00:06:58.880><c> Not</c><00:06:59.039><c> because</c>

00:06:59.270 --> 00:06:59.280 align:start position:0%
won both of those debates. Not because
 

00:06:59.280 --> 00:07:01.270 align:start position:0%
won both of those debates. Not because
she's<00:06:59.520><c> correct.</c><00:07:00.000><c> No,</c><00:07:00.319><c> Niara</c><00:07:00.800><c> is</c><00:07:00.880><c> wrong</c><00:07:01.039><c> about</c>

00:07:01.270 --> 00:07:01.280 align:start position:0%
she's correct. No, Niara is wrong about
 

00:07:01.280 --> 00:07:02.550 align:start position:0%
she's correct. No, Niara is wrong about
basically<00:07:01.599><c> everything</c><00:07:01.759><c> she</c><00:07:02.000><c> says,</c><00:07:02.319><c> but</c>

00:07:02.550 --> 00:07:02.560 align:start position:0%
basically everything she says, but
 

00:07:02.560 --> 00:07:04.469 align:start position:0%
basically everything she says, but
rather<00:07:02.880><c> it's</c><00:07:03.120><c> because</c><00:07:03.360><c> Leaflet</c><00:07:03.919><c> is</c><00:07:04.080><c> horribly</c>

00:07:04.469 --> 00:07:04.479 align:start position:0%
rather it's because Leaflet is horribly
 

00:07:04.479 --> 00:07:06.629 align:start position:0%
rather it's because Leaflet is horribly
uneducated<00:07:04.960><c> on</c><00:07:05.199><c> trans</c><00:07:05.440><c> stuff,</c><00:07:05.759><c> while</c><00:07:06.000><c> AO</c><00:07:06.400><c> is</c><00:07:06.560><c> a</c>

00:07:06.629 --> 00:07:06.639 align:start position:0%
uneducated on trans stuff, while AO is a
 

00:07:06.639 --> 00:07:08.070 align:start position:0%
uneducated on trans stuff, while AO is a
closeted<00:07:07.120><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:07:07.440><c> who</c><00:07:07.680><c> doesn't</c><00:07:07.840><c> want</c><00:07:08.000><c> to</c>

00:07:08.070 --> 00:07:08.080 align:start position:0%
closeted [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] who doesn't want to
 

00:07:08.080 --> 00:07:10.550 align:start position:0%
closeted [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] who doesn't want to
admit<00:07:08.400><c> how</c><00:07:08.560><c> AGP</c><00:07:09.199><c> they</c><00:07:09.440><c> actually</c><00:07:09.599><c> are.</c><00:07:10.160><c> Both</c><00:07:10.479><c> of</c>

00:07:10.550 --> 00:07:10.560 align:start position:0%
admit how AGP they actually are. Both of
 

00:07:10.560 --> 00:07:12.790 align:start position:0%
admit how AGP they actually are. Both of
those<00:07:10.800><c> debates</c><00:07:11.280><c> consisted</c><00:07:11.759><c> of</c><00:07:12.000><c> Nara</c><00:07:12.479><c> asking</c>

00:07:12.790 --> 00:07:12.800 align:start position:0%
those debates consisted of Nara asking
 

00:07:12.800 --> 00:07:15.189 align:start position:0%
those debates consisted of Nara asking
the<00:07:13.039><c> most</c><00:07:13.280><c> obviously</c><00:07:13.919><c> leading</c><00:07:14.400><c> questions</c><00:07:14.880><c> and</c>

00:07:15.189 --> 00:07:15.199 align:start position:0%
the most obviously leading questions and
 

00:07:15.199 --> 00:07:16.870 align:start position:0%
the most obviously leading questions and
dogw<00:07:15.520><c> walking</c><00:07:15.840><c> those</c><00:07:16.000><c> two</c><00:07:16.160><c> into</c><00:07:16.400><c> pitfalls</c>

00:07:16.870 --> 00:07:16.880 align:start position:0%
dogw walking those two into pitfalls
 

00:07:16.880 --> 00:07:18.390 align:start position:0%
dogw walking those two into pitfalls
constantly.<00:07:17.440><c> But</c><00:07:17.520><c> it</c><00:07:17.759><c> was</c><00:07:17.840><c> my</c><00:07:18.000><c> tweet</c><00:07:18.240><c> that</c>

00:07:18.390 --> 00:07:18.400 align:start position:0%
constantly. But it was my tweet that
 

00:07:18.400 --> 00:07:20.309 align:start position:0%
constantly. But it was my tweet that
kicked<00:07:18.639><c> off</c><00:07:18.720><c> a</c><00:07:18.880><c> twoe</c><00:07:19.280><c> crash</c><00:07:19.599><c> out</c><00:07:19.680><c> on</c><00:07:19.840><c> Niara's</c>

00:07:20.309 --> 00:07:20.319 align:start position:0%
kicked off a twoe crash out on Niara's
 

00:07:20.319 --> 00:07:22.070 align:start position:0%
kicked off a twoe crash out on Niara's
part.<00:07:20.560><c> And</c><00:07:20.800><c> funnily</c><00:07:21.039><c> enough,</c><00:07:21.440><c> she</c><00:07:21.680><c> blocked</c><00:07:22.000><c> me</c>

00:07:22.070 --> 00:07:22.080 align:start position:0%
part. And funnily enough, she blocked me
 

00:07:22.080 --> 00:07:23.670 align:start position:0%
part. And funnily enough, she blocked me
at<00:07:22.240><c> the</c><00:07:22.319><c> end</c><00:07:22.400><c> of</c><00:07:22.560><c> week</c><00:07:22.720><c> one.</c><00:07:23.120><c> She</c><00:07:23.280><c> just</c><00:07:23.440><c> kept</c>

00:07:23.670 --> 00:07:23.680 align:start position:0%
at the end of week one. She just kept
 

00:07:23.680 --> 00:07:25.589 align:start position:0%
at the end of week one. She just kept
going<00:07:23.840><c> on</c><00:07:24.000><c> her</c><00:07:24.160><c> own.</c><00:07:24.560><c> She</c><00:07:24.800><c> still</c><00:07:24.960><c> occasionally</c>

00:07:25.589 --> 00:07:25.599 align:start position:0%
going on her own. She still occasionally
 

00:07:25.599 --> 00:07:27.830 align:start position:0%
going on her own. She still occasionally
drops<00:07:26.080><c> veiled</c><00:07:26.560><c> tweets</c><00:07:26.960><c> that</c><00:07:27.120><c> are</c><00:07:27.360><c> related</c><00:07:27.599><c> in</c>

00:07:27.830 --> 00:07:27.840 align:start position:0%
drops veiled tweets that are related in
 

00:07:27.840 --> 00:07:29.830 align:start position:0%
drops veiled tweets that are related in
part<00:07:28.000><c> to</c><00:07:28.160><c> our</c><00:07:28.400><c> very</c><00:07:28.639><c> long</c><00:07:28.800><c> argument.</c><00:07:29.360><c> Even</c><00:07:29.599><c> as</c>

00:07:29.830 --> 00:07:29.840 align:start position:0%
part to our very long argument. Even as
 

00:07:29.840 --> 00:07:31.350 align:start position:0%
part to our very long argument. Even as
I'm<00:07:30.000><c> recording</c><00:07:30.319><c> this</c><00:07:30.560><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:07:30.800><c> video,</c><00:07:31.120><c> she's</c>

00:07:31.350 --> 00:07:31.360 align:start position:0%
I'm recording this [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] video, she's
 

00:07:31.360 --> 00:07:32.870 align:start position:0%
I'm recording this [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] video, she's
still<00:07:31.520><c> doing</c><00:07:31.599><c> it,</c><00:07:31.840><c> dude.</c><00:07:32.080><c> But</c><00:07:32.240><c> as</c><00:07:32.400><c> fun</c><00:07:32.560><c> as</c><00:07:32.720><c> this</c>

00:07:32.870 --> 00:07:32.880 align:start position:0%
still doing it, dude. But as fun as this
 

00:07:32.880 --> 00:07:34.950 align:start position:0%
still doing it, dude. But as fun as this
all<00:07:33.039><c> is,</c><00:07:33.360><c> this</c><00:07:33.599><c> isn't</c><00:07:33.759><c> really</c><00:07:33.919><c> a</c><00:07:34.160><c> Niara</c><00:07:34.639><c> drama</c>

00:07:34.950 --> 00:07:34.960 align:start position:0%
all is, this isn't really a Niara drama
 

00:07:34.960 --> 00:07:36.150 align:start position:0%
all is, this isn't really a Niara drama
video.<00:07:35.199><c> If</c><00:07:35.360><c> the</c><00:07:35.440><c> title</c><00:07:35.680><c> didn't</c><00:07:35.840><c> make</c><00:07:36.000><c> that</c>

00:07:36.150 --> 00:07:36.160 align:start position:0%
video. If the title didn't make that
 

00:07:36.160 --> 00:07:38.150 align:start position:0%
video. If the title didn't make that
obvious,<00:07:36.720><c> I</c><00:07:36.880><c> want</c><00:07:37.039><c> to</c><00:07:37.199><c> actually</c><00:07:37.520><c> discuss</c><00:07:37.840><c> the</c>

00:07:38.150 --> 00:07:38.160 align:start position:0%
obvious, I want to actually discuss the
 

00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:40.309 align:start position:0%
obvious, I want to actually discuss the
underlying<00:07:38.639><c> ideas.</c><00:07:39.280><c> Nara's</c><00:07:39.840><c> position</c><00:07:40.080><c> is</c>

00:07:40.309 --> 00:07:40.319 align:start position:0%
underlying ideas. Nara's position is
 

00:07:40.319 --> 00:07:41.990 align:start position:0%
underlying ideas. Nara's position is
that<00:07:40.479><c> the</c><00:07:40.639><c> classification</c><00:07:41.199><c> of</c><00:07:41.360><c> biological</c>

00:07:41.990 --> 00:07:42.000 align:start position:0%
that the classification of biological
 

00:07:42.000 --> 00:07:44.070 align:start position:0%
that the classification of biological
female<00:07:42.479><c> doesn't</c><00:07:42.800><c> actually</c><00:07:43.199><c> work.</c><00:07:43.680><c> In</c><00:07:43.840><c> her</c>

00:07:44.070 --> 00:07:44.080 align:start position:0%
female doesn't actually work. In her
 

00:07:44.080 --> 00:07:45.909 align:start position:0%
female doesn't actually work. In her
view,<00:07:44.400><c> gametes</c><00:07:44.960><c> don't</c><00:07:45.120><c> work</c><00:07:45.360><c> because</c><00:07:45.680><c> some</c>

00:07:45.909 --> 00:07:45.919 align:start position:0%
view, gametes don't work because some
 

00:07:45.919 --> 00:07:47.430 align:start position:0%
view, gametes don't work because some
cis<00:07:46.240><c> women</c><00:07:46.479><c> don't</c><00:07:46.639><c> produce</c><00:07:46.880><c> gameamtes.</c>

00:07:47.430 --> 00:07:47.440 align:start position:0%
cis women don't produce gameamtes.
 

00:07:47.440 --> 00:07:49.110 align:start position:0%
cis women don't produce gameamtes.
Chromosomes<00:07:48.000><c> don't</c><00:07:48.240><c> work</c><00:07:48.400><c> because</c><00:07:48.639><c> some</c><00:07:48.880><c> cis</c>

00:07:49.110 --> 00:07:49.120 align:start position:0%
Chromosomes don't work because some cis
 

00:07:49.120 --> 00:07:51.270 align:start position:0%
Chromosomes don't work because some cis
women<00:07:49.440><c> don't</c><00:07:49.680><c> have</c><00:07:49.919><c> XX</c><00:07:50.400><c> chromosomes.</c><00:07:51.039><c> The</c>

00:07:51.270 --> 00:07:51.280 align:start position:0%
women don't have XX chromosomes. The
 

00:07:51.280 --> 00:07:53.029 align:start position:0%
women don't have XX chromosomes. The
argument<00:07:51.599><c> she's</c><00:07:51.919><c> making</c><00:07:52.160><c> is</c><00:07:52.319><c> that</c><00:07:52.560><c> because</c><00:07:52.800><c> we</c>

00:07:53.029 --> 00:07:53.039 align:start position:0%
argument she's making is that because we
 

00:07:53.039 --> 00:07:55.270 align:start position:0%
argument she's making is that because we
can't<00:07:53.360><c> draw</c><00:07:53.599><c> a</c><00:07:53.840><c> line</c><00:07:54.080><c> between</c><00:07:54.400><c> all</c><00:07:54.639><c> cis</c><00:07:54.960><c> women</c>

00:07:55.270 --> 00:07:55.280 align:start position:0%
can't draw a line between all cis women
 

00:07:55.280 --> 00:07:57.510 align:start position:0%
can't draw a line between all cis women
and<00:07:55.599><c> all</c><00:07:55.840><c> non-cis</c><00:07:56.479><c> women</c><00:07:56.720><c> to</c><00:07:56.960><c> define</c><00:07:57.280><c> the</c>

00:07:57.510 --> 00:07:57.520 align:start position:0%
and all non-cis women to define the
 

00:07:57.520 --> 00:07:59.270 align:start position:0%
and all non-cis women to define the
phrase<00:07:58.000><c> biological</c><00:07:58.560><c> female,</c><00:07:58.960><c> then</c><00:07:59.199><c> the</c>

00:07:59.270 --> 00:07:59.280 align:start position:0%
phrase biological female, then the
 

00:07:59.280 --> 00:08:01.110 align:start position:0%
phrase biological female, then the
classification<00:08:00.080><c> doesn't</c><00:08:00.400><c> actually</c><00:08:00.720><c> work.</c>

00:08:01.110 --> 00:08:01.120 align:start position:0%
classification doesn't actually work.
 

00:08:01.120 --> 00:08:02.950 align:start position:0%
classification doesn't actually work.
But<00:08:01.280><c> Nar</c><00:08:01.680><c> is</c><00:08:01.840><c> engaging</c><00:08:02.160><c> in</c><00:08:02.319><c> a</c><00:08:02.479><c> very</c><00:08:02.639><c> obvious</c>

00:08:02.950 --> 00:08:02.960 align:start position:0%
But Nar is engaging in a very obvious
 

00:08:02.960 --> 00:08:04.790 align:start position:0%
But Nar is engaging in a very obvious
Loki's<00:08:03.360><c> wager</c><00:08:03.759><c> fallacy.</c><00:08:04.240><c> Just</c><00:08:04.400><c> in</c><00:08:04.560><c> case</c><00:08:04.720><c> you</c>

00:08:04.790 --> 00:08:04.800 align:start position:0%
Loki's wager fallacy. Just in case you
 

00:08:04.800 --> 00:08:06.390 align:start position:0%
Loki's wager fallacy. Just in case you
don't<00:08:04.960><c> know,</c><00:08:05.120><c> the</c><00:08:05.280><c> Loki's</c><00:08:05.680><c> wager</c><00:08:06.000><c> fallacy</c>

00:08:06.390 --> 00:08:06.400 align:start position:0%
don't know, the Loki's wager fallacy
 

00:08:06.400 --> 00:08:07.990 align:start position:0%
don't know, the Loki's wager fallacy
comes<00:08:06.639><c> from</c><00:08:06.800><c> this</c><00:08:06.960><c> story</c><00:08:07.199><c> where</c><00:08:07.360><c> Loki</c><00:08:07.759><c> made</c><00:08:07.919><c> a</c>

00:08:07.990 --> 00:08:08.000 align:start position:0%
comes from this story where Loki made a
 

00:08:08.000 --> 00:08:09.749 align:start position:0%
comes from this story where Loki made a
bet<00:08:08.160><c> with</c><00:08:08.319><c> some</c><00:08:08.479><c> dwarves</c><00:08:08.879><c> and</c><00:08:09.120><c> he</c><00:08:09.199><c> wagered</c><00:08:09.599><c> his</c>

00:08:09.749 --> 00:08:09.759 align:start position:0%
bet with some dwarves and he wagered his
 

00:08:09.759 --> 00:08:11.110 align:start position:0%
bet with some dwarves and he wagered his
head.<00:08:10.000><c> He</c><00:08:10.240><c> lost</c><00:08:10.400><c> the</c><00:08:10.560><c> bet.</c><00:08:10.720><c> So</c><00:08:10.879><c> when</c><00:08:11.039><c> the</c>

00:08:11.110 --> 00:08:11.120 align:start position:0%
head. He lost the bet. So when the
 

00:08:11.120 --> 00:08:12.790 align:start position:0%
head. He lost the bet. So when the
dwarfs<00:08:11.440><c> came</c><00:08:11.520><c> to</c><00:08:11.680><c> collect,</c><00:08:12.080><c> Loki</c><00:08:12.400><c> said,</c><00:08:12.479><c> "You</c>

00:08:12.790 --> 00:08:12.800 align:start position:0%
dwarfs came to collect, Loki said, "You
 

00:08:12.800 --> 00:08:14.550 align:start position:0%
dwarfs came to collect, Loki said, "You
can<00:08:12.879><c> have</c><00:08:13.039><c> my</c><00:08:13.280><c> head</c><00:08:13.440><c> but</c><00:08:13.680><c> none</c><00:08:13.840><c> of</c><00:08:14.000><c> my</c><00:08:14.160><c> neck."</c>

00:08:14.550 --> 00:08:14.560 align:start position:0%
can have my head but none of my neck."
 

00:08:14.560 --> 00:08:15.909 align:start position:0%
can have my head but none of my neck."
While<00:08:14.800><c> everybody</c><00:08:15.120><c> involved</c><00:08:15.520><c> could</c><00:08:15.759><c> agree</c>

00:08:15.909 --> 00:08:15.919 align:start position:0%
While everybody involved could agree
 

00:08:15.919 --> 00:08:17.830 align:start position:0%
While everybody involved could agree
that<00:08:16.080><c> Loki</c><00:08:16.479><c> had</c><00:08:16.560><c> a</c><00:08:16.720><c> head</c><00:08:16.879><c> and</c><00:08:17.039><c> a</c><00:08:17.199><c> neck,</c><00:08:17.520><c> nobody</c>

00:08:17.830 --> 00:08:17.840 align:start position:0%
that Loki had a head and a neck, nobody
 

00:08:17.840 --> 00:08:19.510 align:start position:0%
that Loki had a head and a neck, nobody
could<00:08:18.000><c> agree</c><00:08:18.400><c> precisely</c><00:08:18.879><c> where</c><00:08:19.039><c> the</c><00:08:19.199><c> neck</c>

00:08:19.510 --> 00:08:19.520 align:start position:0%
could agree precisely where the neck
 

00:08:19.520 --> 00:08:21.430 align:start position:0%
could agree precisely where the neck
ended<00:08:19.759><c> and</c><00:08:20.000><c> where</c><00:08:20.160><c> the</c><00:08:20.319><c> head</c><00:08:20.479><c> began.</c><00:08:21.039><c> As</c><00:08:21.280><c> a</c>

00:08:21.430 --> 00:08:21.440 align:start position:0%
ended and where the head began. As a
 

00:08:21.440 --> 00:08:23.270 align:start position:0%
ended and where the head began. As a
result,<00:08:21.680><c> the</c><00:08:21.919><c> dwarves</c><00:08:22.319><c> could</c><00:08:22.479><c> never</c><00:08:22.720><c> truly</c><00:08:23.039><c> be</c>

00:08:23.270 --> 00:08:23.280 align:start position:0%
result, the dwarves could never truly be
 

00:08:23.280 --> 00:08:25.110 align:start position:0%
result, the dwarves could never truly be
sure<00:08:23.520><c> if</c><00:08:23.759><c> they</c><00:08:23.919><c> were</c><00:08:24.080><c> taking</c><00:08:24.319><c> neck</c><00:08:24.560><c> from</c><00:08:24.800><c> Loki</c>

00:08:25.110 --> 00:08:25.120 align:start position:0%
sure if they were taking neck from Loki
 

00:08:25.120 --> 00:08:26.869 align:start position:0%
sure if they were taking neck from Loki
that<00:08:25.280><c> they</c><00:08:25.440><c> had</c><00:08:25.599><c> no</c><00:08:25.759><c> right</c><00:08:25.919><c> to,</c><00:08:26.160><c> and</c><00:08:26.319><c> so</c><00:08:26.560><c> Loki</c>

00:08:26.869 --> 00:08:26.879 align:start position:0%
that they had no right to, and so Loki
 

00:08:26.879 --> 00:08:28.469 align:start position:0%
that they had no right to, and so Loki
got<00:08:27.039><c> away</c><00:08:27.199><c> with</c><00:08:27.360><c> it.</c><00:08:27.599><c> In</c><00:08:27.840><c> the</c><00:08:28.000><c> real</c><00:08:28.160><c> world,</c>

00:08:28.469 --> 00:08:28.479 align:start position:0%
got away with it. In the real world,
 

00:08:28.479 --> 00:08:30.469 align:start position:0%
got away with it. In the real world,
what<00:08:28.639><c> this</c><00:08:28.800><c> fallacy</c><00:08:29.280><c> is</c><00:08:29.440><c> referring</c><00:08:29.759><c> to</c><00:08:30.000><c> goes</c><00:08:30.319><c> a</c>

00:08:30.469 --> 00:08:30.479 align:start position:0%
what this fallacy is referring to goes a
 

00:08:30.479 --> 00:08:32.070 align:start position:0%
what this fallacy is referring to goes a
little<00:08:30.639><c> something</c><00:08:30.800><c> like</c><00:08:31.039><c> this.</c><00:08:31.599><c> Imagine</c><00:08:31.840><c> a</c>

00:08:32.070 --> 00:08:32.080 align:start position:0%
little something like this. Imagine a
 

00:08:32.080 --> 00:08:33.509 align:start position:0%
little something like this. Imagine a
set<00:08:32.159><c> of</c><00:08:32.320><c> data</c><00:08:32.560><c> that</c><00:08:32.719><c> is</c><00:08:32.880><c> distributed</c><00:08:33.360><c> by</c>

00:08:33.509 --> 00:08:33.519 align:start position:0%
set of data that is distributed by
 

00:08:33.519 --> 00:08:35.269 align:start position:0%
set of data that is distributed by
modally,<00:08:34.080><c> meaning</c><00:08:34.320><c> that</c><00:08:34.560><c> while</c><00:08:34.800><c> there</c><00:08:35.039><c> is</c>

00:08:35.269 --> 00:08:35.279 align:start position:0%
modally, meaning that while there is
 

00:08:35.279 --> 00:08:37.029 align:start position:0%
modally, meaning that while there is
observed<00:08:35.839><c> data</c><00:08:36.159><c> points</c><00:08:36.399><c> all</c><00:08:36.640><c> along</c><00:08:36.880><c> the</c>

00:08:37.029 --> 00:08:37.039 align:start position:0%
observed data points all along the
 

00:08:37.039 --> 00:08:38.949 align:start position:0%
observed data points all along the
spectrum,<00:08:37.519><c> a</c><00:08:37.760><c> vast</c><00:08:38.000><c> majority</c><00:08:38.399><c> of</c><00:08:38.479><c> the</c><00:08:38.640><c> data</c>

00:08:38.949 --> 00:08:38.959 align:start position:0%
spectrum, a vast majority of the data
 

00:08:38.959 --> 00:08:41.269 align:start position:0%
spectrum, a vast majority of the data
clusters<00:08:39.360><c> in</c><00:08:39.519><c> two</c><00:08:39.760><c> areas.</c><00:08:40.320><c> A</c><00:08:40.640><c> small</c><00:08:40.880><c> minority</c>

00:08:41.269 --> 00:08:41.279 align:start position:0%
clusters in two areas. A small minority
 

00:08:41.279 --> 00:08:43.110 align:start position:0%
clusters in two areas. A small minority
of<00:08:41.519><c> measured</c><00:08:41.919><c> points</c><00:08:42.240><c> might</c><00:08:42.560><c> exist</c><00:08:42.800><c> to</c><00:08:42.959><c> the</c>

00:08:43.110 --> 00:08:43.120 align:start position:0%
of measured points might exist to the
 

00:08:43.120 --> 00:08:44.790 align:start position:0%
of measured points might exist to the
very<00:08:43.360><c> far</c><00:08:43.599><c> left</c><00:08:43.760><c> or</c><00:08:44.000><c> the</c><00:08:44.159><c> very</c><00:08:44.320><c> far</c><00:08:44.480><c> right</c><00:08:44.640><c> of</c>

00:08:44.790 --> 00:08:44.800 align:start position:0%
very far left or the very far right of
 

00:08:44.800 --> 00:08:46.550 align:start position:0%
very far left or the very far right of
the<00:08:44.959><c> distribution</c><00:08:45.519><c> or</c><00:08:45.760><c> in</c><00:08:46.000><c> between</c><00:08:46.240><c> the</c><00:08:46.399><c> two</c>

00:08:46.550 --> 00:08:46.560 align:start position:0%
the distribution or in between the two
 

00:08:46.560 --> 00:08:48.310 align:start position:0%
the distribution or in between the two
clusters,<00:08:47.120><c> but</c><00:08:47.360><c> most</c><00:08:47.600><c> of</c><00:08:47.680><c> the</c><00:08:47.839><c> points</c><00:08:48.080><c> are</c>

00:08:48.310 --> 00:08:48.320 align:start position:0%
clusters, but most of the points are
 

00:08:48.320 --> 00:08:50.470 align:start position:0%
clusters, but most of the points are
within<00:08:48.640><c> the</c><00:08:48.880><c> clusters.</c><00:08:49.440><c> The</c><00:08:49.600><c> Loki's</c><00:08:50.080><c> wager</c>

00:08:50.470 --> 00:08:50.480 align:start position:0%
within the clusters. The Loki's wager
 

00:08:50.480 --> 00:08:52.470 align:start position:0%
within the clusters. The Loki's wager
fallacy<00:08:50.880><c> is</c><00:08:51.040><c> an</c><00:08:51.279><c> argument</c><00:08:51.519><c> that</c><00:08:51.839><c> says</c><00:08:52.240><c> you</c>

00:08:52.470 --> 00:08:52.480 align:start position:0%
fallacy is an argument that says you
 

00:08:52.480 --> 00:08:54.070 align:start position:0%
fallacy is an argument that says you
cannot<00:08:52.800><c> actually</c><00:08:53.120><c> recognize</c><00:08:53.600><c> these</c><00:08:53.839><c> two</c>

00:08:54.070 --> 00:08:54.080 align:start position:0%
cannot actually recognize these two
 

00:08:54.080 --> 00:08:56.070 align:start position:0%
cannot actually recognize these two
clusters<00:08:54.560><c> as</c><00:08:54.880><c> distinct</c><00:08:55.279><c> groups</c><00:08:55.760><c> simply</c>

00:08:56.070 --> 00:08:56.080 align:start position:0%
clusters as distinct groups simply
 

00:08:56.080 --> 00:08:57.990 align:start position:0%
clusters as distinct groups simply
because<00:08:56.320><c> you</c><00:08:56.560><c> cannot</c><00:08:56.880><c> draw</c><00:08:57.120><c> a</c><00:08:57.360><c> perfect</c><00:08:57.680><c> line</c>

00:08:57.990 --> 00:08:58.000 align:start position:0%
because you cannot draw a perfect line
 

00:08:58.000 --> 00:08:59.750 align:start position:0%
because you cannot draw a perfect line
dividing<00:08:58.399><c> the</c><00:08:58.560><c> two</c><00:08:58.880><c> since</c><00:08:59.120><c> those</c><00:08:59.519><c> middle</c>

00:08:59.750 --> 00:08:59.760 align:start position:0%
dividing the two since those middle
 

00:08:59.760 --> 00:09:01.509 align:start position:0%
dividing the two since those middle
outliers<00:09:00.240><c> get</c><00:09:00.399><c> in</c><00:09:00.560><c> the</c><00:09:00.640><c> way.</c><00:09:00.959><c> The</c><00:09:01.120><c> most</c><00:09:01.279><c> famous</c>

00:09:01.509 --> 00:09:01.519 align:start position:0%
outliers get in the way. The most famous
 

00:09:01.519 --> 00:09:03.269 align:start position:0%
outliers get in the way. The most famous
biodal<00:09:02.080><c> distribution,</c><00:09:02.560><c> by</c><00:09:02.720><c> the</c><00:09:02.800><c> way,</c><00:09:02.959><c> is</c><00:09:03.120><c> the</c>

00:09:03.269 --> 00:09:03.279 align:start position:0%
biodal distribution, by the way, is the
 

00:09:03.279 --> 00:09:05.190 align:start position:0%
biodal distribution, by the way, is the
measurement<00:09:03.680><c> of</c><00:09:03.839><c> primary</c><00:09:04.320><c> and</c><00:09:04.480><c> secondary</c><00:09:04.959><c> sex</c>

00:09:05.190 --> 00:09:05.200 align:start position:0%
measurement of primary and secondary sex
 

00:09:05.200 --> 00:09:07.110 align:start position:0%
measurement of primary and secondary sex
characteristics.<00:09:06.080><c> The</c><00:09:06.320><c> vast</c><00:09:06.560><c> majority</c><00:09:06.959><c> of</c>

00:09:07.110 --> 00:09:07.120 align:start position:0%
characteristics. The vast majority of
 

00:09:07.120 --> 00:09:08.790 align:start position:0%
characteristics. The vast majority of
human<00:09:07.360><c> beings</c><00:09:07.519><c> that</c><00:09:07.760><c> are</c><00:09:07.839><c> measured</c><00:09:08.240><c> fall</c><00:09:08.480><c> into</c>

00:09:08.790 --> 00:09:08.800 align:start position:0%
human beings that are measured fall into
 

00:09:08.800 --> 00:09:10.070 align:start position:0%
human beings that are measured fall into
either<00:09:09.040><c> the</c><00:09:09.200><c> masculine</c><00:09:09.600><c> or</c><00:09:09.760><c> feminine</c>

00:09:10.070 --> 00:09:10.080 align:start position:0%
either the masculine or feminine
 

00:09:10.080 --> 00:09:11.750 align:start position:0%
either the masculine or feminine
clusters.<00:09:10.720><c> But</c><00:09:10.800><c> there</c><00:09:10.959><c> is</c><00:09:11.120><c> a</c><00:09:11.279><c> minority</c><00:09:11.600><c> of</c>

00:09:11.750 --> 00:09:11.760 align:start position:0%
clusters. But there is a minority of
 

00:09:11.760 --> 00:09:12.870 align:start position:0%
clusters. But there is a minority of
people<00:09:11.839><c> that</c><00:09:12.080><c> don't</c><00:09:12.240><c> fall</c><00:09:12.399><c> neatly</c><00:09:12.640><c> into</c>

00:09:12.870 --> 00:09:12.880 align:start position:0%
people that don't fall neatly into
 

00:09:12.880 --> 00:09:14.550 align:start position:0%
people that don't fall neatly into
either<00:09:13.120><c> and</c><00:09:13.360><c> exist</c><00:09:13.600><c> in</c><00:09:13.760><c> the</c><00:09:13.839><c> middle.</c><00:09:14.240><c> Because</c>

00:09:14.550 --> 00:09:14.560 align:start position:0%
either and exist in the middle. Because
 

00:09:14.560 --> 00:09:16.870 align:start position:0%
either and exist in the middle. Because
these<00:09:14.959><c> people</c><00:09:15.279><c> exist,</c><00:09:15.839><c> you</c><00:09:16.080><c> cannot</c><00:09:16.480><c> cleanly</c>

00:09:16.870 --> 00:09:16.880 align:start position:0%
these people exist, you cannot cleanly
 

00:09:16.880 --> 00:09:18.790 align:start position:0%
these people exist, you cannot cleanly
draw<00:09:17.120><c> a</c><00:09:17.360><c> line</c><00:09:17.600><c> between</c><00:09:17.839><c> the</c><00:09:18.000><c> two</c><00:09:18.160><c> clusters.</c>

00:09:18.790 --> 00:09:18.800 align:start position:0%
draw a line between the two clusters.
 

00:09:18.800 --> 00:09:19.990 align:start position:0%
draw a line between the two clusters.
And<00:09:18.959><c> therefore,</c><00:09:19.279><c> you</c><00:09:19.440><c> cannot</c><00:09:19.760><c> actually</c>

00:09:19.990 --> 00:09:20.000 align:start position:0%
And therefore, you cannot actually
 

00:09:20.000 --> 00:09:21.590 align:start position:0%
And therefore, you cannot actually
differentiate<00:09:20.480><c> between</c><00:09:20.640><c> the</c><00:09:20.800><c> two</c><00:09:20.959><c> clusters.</c>

00:09:21.590 --> 00:09:21.600 align:start position:0%
differentiate between the two clusters.
 

00:09:21.600 --> 00:09:23.350 align:start position:0%
differentiate between the two clusters.
That<00:09:21.760><c> is</c><00:09:21.920><c> the</c><00:09:22.080><c> Loki's</c><00:09:22.480><c> wager</c><00:09:22.800><c> fallacy.</c><00:09:23.200><c> And</c>

00:09:23.350 --> 00:09:23.360 align:start position:0%
That is the Loki's wager fallacy. And
 

00:09:23.360 --> 00:09:25.030 align:start position:0%
That is the Loki's wager fallacy. And
that<00:09:23.600><c> is</c><00:09:23.760><c> one</c><00:09:24.000><c> problem</c><00:09:24.320><c> among</c><00:09:24.640><c> many</c><00:09:24.880><c> with</c>

00:09:25.030 --> 00:09:25.040 align:start position:0%
that is one problem among many with
 

00:09:25.040 --> 00:09:27.190 align:start position:0%
that is one problem among many with
Nara's<00:09:25.519><c> logic.</c><00:09:26.080><c> By</c><00:09:26.240><c> the</c><00:09:26.320><c> way,</c><00:09:26.640><c> my</c><00:09:26.880><c> pointing</c>

00:09:27.190 --> 00:09:27.200 align:start position:0%
Nara's logic. By the way, my pointing
 

00:09:27.200 --> 00:09:29.350 align:start position:0%
Nara's logic. By the way, my pointing
out<00:09:27.360><c> this</c><00:09:27.600><c> obvious</c><00:09:28.000><c> logical</c><00:09:28.399><c> inconsistency</c>

00:09:29.350 --> 00:09:29.360 align:start position:0%
out this obvious logical inconsistency
 

00:09:29.360 --> 00:09:31.190 align:start position:0%
out this obvious logical inconsistency
was<00:09:29.600><c> like</c><00:09:29.920><c> two</c><00:09:30.240><c> tweets</c><00:09:30.560><c> into</c><00:09:30.800><c> this</c><00:09:31.040><c> whole</c>

00:09:31.190 --> 00:09:31.200 align:start position:0%
was like two tweets into this whole
 

00:09:31.200 --> 00:09:32.630 align:start position:0%
was like two tweets into this whole
thing.<00:09:31.440><c> And</c><00:09:31.600><c> I</c><00:09:31.839><c> realized</c><00:09:32.240><c> pretty</c><00:09:32.480><c> much</c>

00:09:32.630 --> 00:09:32.640 align:start position:0%
thing. And I realized pretty much
 

00:09:32.640 --> 00:09:34.550 align:start position:0%
thing. And I realized pretty much
instantly<00:09:33.120><c> that</c><00:09:33.440><c> Niara</c><00:09:33.920><c> was</c><00:09:34.160><c> not</c><00:09:34.320><c> going</c><00:09:34.399><c> to</c>

00:09:34.550 --> 00:09:34.560 align:start position:0%
instantly that Niara was not going to
 

00:09:34.560 --> 00:09:36.310 align:start position:0%
instantly that Niara was not going to
debate<00:09:34.880><c> me</c><00:09:34.959><c> on</c><00:09:35.200><c> stream</c><00:09:35.440><c> like</c><00:09:35.600><c> she</c><00:09:35.760><c> did</c><00:09:35.839><c> with</c><00:09:36.000><c> AO</c>

00:09:36.310 --> 00:09:36.320 align:start position:0%
debate me on stream like she did with AO
 

00:09:36.320 --> 00:09:38.230 align:start position:0%
debate me on stream like she did with AO
and<00:09:36.399><c> Leaflet.</c><00:09:37.040><c> It's</c><00:09:37.200><c> a</c><00:09:37.360><c> lot</c><00:09:37.519><c> easier</c><00:09:37.760><c> to</c><00:09:37.920><c> defend</c>

00:09:38.230 --> 00:09:38.240 align:start position:0%
and Leaflet. It's a lot easier to defend
 

00:09:38.240 --> 00:09:39.829 align:start position:0%
and Leaflet. It's a lot easier to defend
your<00:09:38.399><c> ideas</c><00:09:38.720><c> in</c><00:09:38.880><c> front</c><00:09:38.959><c> of</c><00:09:39.040><c> an</c><00:09:39.279><c> audience</c><00:09:39.600><c> when</c>

00:09:39.829 --> 00:09:39.839 align:start position:0%
your ideas in front of an audience when
 

00:09:39.839 --> 00:09:40.949 align:start position:0%
your ideas in front of an audience when
you're<00:09:40.000><c> dealing</c><00:09:40.240><c> with</c><00:09:40.320><c> a</c><00:09:40.480><c> degenerate</c>

00:09:40.949 --> 00:09:40.959 align:start position:0%
you're dealing with a degenerate
 

00:09:40.959 --> 00:09:42.470 align:start position:0%
you're dealing with a degenerate
inbredad<00:09:41.440><c> or</c><00:09:41.680><c> somebody</c><00:09:41.839><c> who</c><00:09:42.080><c> just</c><00:09:42.240><c> doesn't</c>

00:09:42.470 --> 00:09:42.480 align:start position:0%
inbredad or somebody who just doesn't
 

00:09:42.480 --> 00:09:44.230 align:start position:0%
inbredad or somebody who just doesn't
know<00:09:42.640><c> about</c><00:09:42.800><c> trans</c><00:09:43.200><c> stuff</c><00:09:43.519><c> respectively.</c><00:09:44.080><c> Not</c>

00:09:44.230 --> 00:09:44.240 align:start position:0%
know about trans stuff respectively. Not
 

00:09:44.240 --> 00:09:45.990 align:start position:0%
know about trans stuff respectively. Not
to<00:09:44.399><c> toot</c><00:09:44.640><c> my</c><00:09:44.720><c> own</c><00:09:44.880><c> horn</c><00:09:45.120><c> too</c><00:09:45.279><c> much,</c><00:09:45.519><c> but</c><00:09:45.760><c> I</c>

00:09:45.990 --> 00:09:46.000 align:start position:0%
to toot my own horn too much, but I
 

00:09:46.000 --> 00:09:47.590 align:start position:0%
to toot my own horn too much, but I
actually<00:09:46.240><c> do</c><00:09:46.480><c> know</c><00:09:46.640><c> a</c><00:09:46.800><c> fair</c><00:09:47.040><c> bit</c><00:09:47.200><c> about</c><00:09:47.360><c> this</c>

00:09:47.590 --> 00:09:47.600 align:start position:0%
actually do know a fair bit about this
 

00:09:47.600 --> 00:09:49.190 align:start position:0%
actually do know a fair bit about this
stuff.<00:09:48.000><c> And</c><00:09:48.160><c> I</c><00:09:48.399><c> don't</c><00:09:48.560><c> think</c><00:09:48.720><c> that</c><00:09:48.959><c> somebody</c>

00:09:49.190 --> 00:09:49.200 align:start position:0%
stuff. And I don't think that somebody
 

00:09:49.200 --> 00:09:51.269 align:start position:0%
stuff. And I don't think that somebody
like<00:09:49.440><c> Niara</c><00:09:50.000><c> could</c><00:09:50.240><c> ever</c><00:09:50.480><c> actually</c><00:09:50.800><c> face</c><00:09:51.120><c> a</c>

00:09:51.269 --> 00:09:51.279 align:start position:0%
like Niara could ever actually face a
 

00:09:51.279 --> 00:09:53.670 align:start position:0%
like Niara could ever actually face a
real<00:09:51.519><c> criticism</c><00:09:51.920><c> of</c><00:09:52.080><c> her</c><00:09:52.320><c> ideas.</c><00:09:52.880><c> Nara's</c><00:09:53.519><c> next</c>

00:09:53.670 --> 00:09:53.680 align:start position:0%
real criticism of her ideas. Nara's next
 

00:09:53.680 --> 00:09:55.990 align:start position:0%
real criticism of her ideas. Nara's next
point<00:09:53.920><c> is</c><00:09:54.080><c> that</c><00:09:54.399><c> HRT</c><00:09:55.040><c> gives</c><00:09:55.279><c> you</c><00:09:55.440><c> changes</c>

00:09:55.990 --> 00:09:56.000 align:start position:0%
point is that HRT gives you changes
 

00:09:56.000 --> 00:09:57.990 align:start position:0%
point is that HRT gives you changes
associated<00:09:56.560><c> with</c><00:09:56.720><c> the</c><00:09:56.880><c> opposite</c><00:09:57.200><c> sex.</c><00:09:57.760><c> And</c>

00:09:57.990 --> 00:09:58.000 align:start position:0%
associated with the opposite sex. And
 

00:09:58.000 --> 00:10:00.389 align:start position:0%
associated with the opposite sex. And
this<00:09:58.160><c> is</c><00:09:58.399><c> true.</c><00:09:58.720><c> A</c><00:09:58.880><c> trans</c><00:09:59.120><c> woman</c><00:09:59.279><c> on</c><00:09:59.519><c> HRT</c><00:10:00.080><c> has</c>

00:10:00.389 --> 00:10:00.399 align:start position:0%
this is true. A trans woman on HRT has
 

00:10:00.399 --> 00:10:01.990 align:start position:0%
this is true. A trans woman on HRT has
female<00:10:00.720><c> hormones.</c><00:10:01.279><c> Though</c><00:10:01.440><c> I</c><00:10:01.600><c> have</c><00:10:01.760><c> actually</c>

00:10:01.990 --> 00:10:02.000 align:start position:0%
female hormones. Though I have actually
 

00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:03.829 align:start position:0%
female hormones. Though I have actually
heard<00:10:02.240><c> some</c><00:10:02.399><c> anecdotes</c><00:10:02.880><c> that</c><00:10:03.120><c> post</c><00:10:03.279><c> opt</c><00:10:03.680><c> trans</c>

00:10:03.829 --> 00:10:03.839 align:start position:0%
heard some anecdotes that post opt trans
 

00:10:03.839 --> 00:10:05.750 align:start position:0%
heard some anecdotes that post opt trans
women<00:10:04.000><c> on</c><00:10:04.160><c> HRT</c><00:10:04.640><c> have</c><00:10:04.800><c> hormone</c><00:10:05.200><c> profiles</c><00:10:05.600><c> that</c>

00:10:05.750 --> 00:10:05.760 align:start position:0%
women on HRT have hormone profiles that
 

00:10:05.760 --> 00:10:07.190 align:start position:0%
women on HRT have hormone profiles that
are<00:10:05.839><c> more</c><00:10:06.000><c> like</c><00:10:06.080><c> menopausal</c><00:10:06.720><c> women,</c><00:10:07.040><c> which</c>

00:10:07.190 --> 00:10:07.200 align:start position:0%
are more like menopausal women, which
 

00:10:07.200 --> 00:10:08.150 align:start position:0%
are more like menopausal women, which
isn't<00:10:07.440><c> normal</c><00:10:07.680><c> if</c><00:10:07.839><c> you're</c><00:10:07.920><c> in</c><00:10:08.000><c> the</c>

00:10:08.150 --> 00:10:08.160 align:start position:0%
isn't normal if you're in the
 

00:10:08.160 --> 00:10:09.670 align:start position:0%
isn't normal if you're in the
premenopause<00:10:08.800><c> age,</c><00:10:09.040><c> but</c><00:10:09.200><c> that's</c><00:10:09.360><c> a</c><00:10:09.440><c> minor</c>

00:10:09.670 --> 00:10:09.680 align:start position:0%
premenopause age, but that's a minor
 

00:10:09.680 --> 00:10:11.750 align:start position:0%
premenopause age, but that's a minor
detail.<00:10:10.240><c> Hormones</c><00:10:10.800><c> do</c><00:10:11.040><c> in</c><00:10:11.200><c> fact</c><00:10:11.440><c> change</c>

00:10:11.750 --> 00:10:11.760 align:start position:0%
detail. Hormones do in fact change
 

00:10:11.760 --> 00:10:13.829 align:start position:0%
detail. Hormones do in fact change
things<00:10:12.000><c> quite</c><00:10:12.240><c> a</c><00:10:12.399><c> bit.</c><00:10:12.720><c> So,</c><00:10:12.959><c> fair</c><00:10:13.120><c> enough.</c><00:10:13.680><c> But</c>

00:10:13.829 --> 00:10:13.839 align:start position:0%
things quite a bit. So, fair enough. But
 

00:10:13.839 --> 00:10:16.069 align:start position:0%
things quite a bit. So, fair enough. But
being<00:10:14.160><c> hormonally</c><00:10:14.800><c> female</c><00:10:15.279><c> is</c><00:10:15.519><c> not</c><00:10:15.760><c> the</c><00:10:15.920><c> same</c>

00:10:16.069 --> 00:10:16.079 align:start position:0%
being hormonally female is not the same
 

00:10:16.079 --> 00:10:18.470 align:start position:0%
being hormonally female is not the same
thing<00:10:16.320><c> as</c><00:10:16.640><c> being</c><00:10:16.959><c> fully</c><00:10:17.279><c> female.</c><00:10:17.920><c> It's</c><00:10:18.079><c> a</c><00:10:18.320><c> part</c>

00:10:18.470 --> 00:10:18.480 align:start position:0%
thing as being fully female. It's a part
 

00:10:18.480 --> 00:10:19.990 align:start position:0%
thing as being fully female. It's a part
of<00:10:18.640><c> being</c><00:10:18.880><c> female,</c><00:10:19.279><c> but</c><00:10:19.440><c> it's</c><00:10:19.600><c> not</c><00:10:19.680><c> the</c><00:10:19.839><c> whole</c>

00:10:19.990 --> 00:10:20.000 align:start position:0%
of being female, but it's not the whole
 

00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:22.310 align:start position:0%
of being female, but it's not the whole
thing.<00:10:20.320><c> Interex</c><00:10:20.880><c> people</c><00:10:21.200><c> also</c><00:10:21.600><c> do</c><00:10:21.920><c> break</c><00:10:22.160><c> the</c>

00:10:22.310 --> 00:10:22.320 align:start position:0%
thing. Interex people also do break the
 

00:10:22.320 --> 00:10:23.990 align:start position:0%
thing. Interex people also do break the
black<00:10:22.480><c> and</c><00:10:22.720><c> white</c><00:10:22.959><c> thinking.</c><00:10:23.360><c> Again,</c><00:10:23.760><c> fair</c>

00:10:23.990 --> 00:10:24.000 align:start position:0%
black and white thinking. Again, fair
 

00:10:24.000 --> 00:10:25.829 align:start position:0%
black and white thinking. Again, fair
enough.<00:10:24.480><c> But</c><00:10:24.640><c> trans</c><00:10:24.959><c> women</c><00:10:25.120><c> and</c><00:10:25.360><c> interex</c>

00:10:25.829 --> 00:10:25.839 align:start position:0%
enough. But trans women and interex
 

00:10:25.839 --> 00:10:27.350 align:start position:0%
enough. But trans women and interex
people<00:10:26.000><c> are</c><00:10:26.240><c> two</c><00:10:26.399><c> different</c><00:10:26.640><c> things.</c><00:10:27.120><c> There</c>

00:10:27.350 --> 00:10:27.360 align:start position:0%
people are two different things. There
 

00:10:27.360 --> 00:10:29.110 align:start position:0%
people are two different things. There
is<00:10:27.519><c> overlap</c><00:10:28.000><c> of</c><00:10:28.160><c> course,</c><00:10:28.399><c> but</c><00:10:28.560><c> a</c><00:10:28.720><c> lot</c><00:10:28.800><c> of</c><00:10:28.959><c> trans</c>

00:10:29.110 --> 00:10:29.120 align:start position:0%
is overlap of course, but a lot of trans
 

00:10:29.120 --> 00:10:30.710 align:start position:0%
is overlap of course, but a lot of trans
women<00:10:29.360><c> out</c><00:10:29.519><c> there</c><00:10:29.760><c> were</c><00:10:30.000><c> not</c><00:10:30.160><c> actually</c><00:10:30.480><c> born</c>

00:10:30.710 --> 00:10:30.720 align:start position:0%
women out there were not actually born
 

00:10:30.720 --> 00:10:32.790 align:start position:0%
women out there were not actually born
with<00:10:30.959><c> some</c><00:10:31.200><c> interex</c><00:10:31.680><c> condition.</c><00:10:32.399><c> Trans</c>

00:10:32.790 --> 00:10:32.800 align:start position:0%
with some interex condition. Trans
 

00:10:32.800 --> 00:10:34.870 align:start position:0%
with some interex condition. Trans
activists<00:10:33.440><c> have</c><00:10:33.600><c> been</c><00:10:33.760><c> co-opting</c><00:10:34.320><c> interex</c>

00:10:34.870 --> 00:10:34.880 align:start position:0%
activists have been co-opting interex
 

00:10:34.880 --> 00:10:36.389 align:start position:0%
activists have been co-opting interex
struggles<00:10:35.200><c> for</c><00:10:35.360><c> their</c><00:10:35.600><c> own</c><00:10:35.760><c> purposes</c><00:10:36.160><c> for</c><00:10:36.320><c> a</c>

00:10:36.389 --> 00:10:36.399 align:start position:0%
struggles for their own purposes for a
 

00:10:36.399 --> 00:10:38.310 align:start position:0%
struggles for their own purposes for a
pretty<00:10:36.640><c> long</c><00:10:36.800><c> time</c><00:10:36.959><c> now.</c><00:10:37.440><c> Trans</c><00:10:37.760><c> women</c><00:10:38.079><c> are</c>

00:10:38.310 --> 00:10:38.320 align:start position:0%
pretty long time now. Trans women are
 

00:10:38.320 --> 00:10:40.230 align:start position:0%
pretty long time now. Trans women are
women.<00:10:38.720><c> We</c><00:10:38.880><c> don't</c><00:10:39.040><c> become</c><00:10:39.360><c> women.</c><00:10:39.920><c> This</c><00:10:40.160><c> is</c>

00:10:40.230 --> 00:10:40.240 align:start position:0%
women. We don't become women. This is
 

00:10:40.240 --> 00:10:42.069 align:start position:0%
women. We don't become women. This is
the<00:10:40.480><c> sex</c><00:10:40.800><c> gender</c><00:10:41.040><c> distinction</c><00:10:41.519><c> thing.</c><00:10:41.760><c> I've</c>

00:10:42.069 --> 00:10:42.079 align:start position:0%
the sex gender distinction thing. I've
 

00:10:42.079 --> 00:10:43.269 align:start position:0%
the sex gender distinction thing. I've
spoken<00:10:42.240><c> about</c><00:10:42.399><c> it</c><00:10:42.560><c> on</c><00:10:42.720><c> this</c><00:10:42.800><c> channel</c><00:10:43.040><c> many</c>

00:10:43.269 --> 00:10:43.279 align:start position:0%
spoken about it on this channel many
 

00:10:43.279 --> 00:10:44.710 align:start position:0%
spoken about it on this channel many
times<00:10:43.440><c> before</c><00:10:43.760><c> and</c><00:10:43.920><c> we'll</c><00:10:44.079><c> dive</c><00:10:44.240><c> into</c><00:10:44.399><c> it</c><00:10:44.560><c> from</c>

00:10:44.710 --> 00:10:44.720 align:start position:0%
times before and we'll dive into it from
 

00:10:44.720 --> 00:10:46.150 align:start position:0%
times before and we'll dive into it from
a<00:10:44.800><c> different</c><00:10:44.959><c> angle</c><00:10:45.200><c> a</c><00:10:45.440><c> little</c><00:10:45.519><c> bit</c><00:10:45.600><c> later.</c>

00:10:46.150 --> 00:10:46.160 align:start position:0%
a different angle a little bit later.
 

00:10:46.160 --> 00:10:47.990 align:start position:0%
a different angle a little bit later.
Same<00:10:46.399><c> thing</c><00:10:46.560><c> with</c><00:10:46.959><c> being</c><00:10:47.279><c> females</c><00:10:47.760><c> and</c><00:10:47.920><c> a</c>

00:10:47.990 --> 00:10:48.000 align:start position:0%
Same thing with being females and a
 

00:10:48.000 --> 00:10:49.430 align:start position:0%
Same thing with being females and a
requirement<00:10:48.320><c> of</c><00:10:48.480><c> being</c><00:10:48.560><c> a</c><00:10:48.720><c> woman.</c><00:10:49.120><c> Here's</c><00:10:49.360><c> the</c>

00:10:49.430 --> 00:10:49.440 align:start position:0%
requirement of being a woman. Here's the
 

00:10:49.440 --> 00:10:51.670 align:start position:0%
requirement of being a woman. Here's the
bit<00:10:49.600><c> I</c><00:10:49.839><c> want</c><00:10:49.920><c> to</c><00:10:50.000><c> focus</c><00:10:50.240><c> on</c><00:10:50.399><c> next.</c><00:10:51.040><c> biological</c>

00:10:51.670 --> 00:10:51.680 align:start position:0%
bit I want to focus on next. biological
 

00:10:51.680 --> 00:10:53.910 align:start position:0%
bit I want to focus on next. biological
female<00:10:52.160><c> as</c><00:10:52.399><c> if</c><00:10:52.640><c> trans</c><00:10:52.959><c> women</c><00:10:53.200><c> are</c><00:10:53.440><c> artificial</c>

00:10:53.910 --> 00:10:53.920 align:start position:0%
female as if trans women are artificial
 

00:10:53.920 --> 00:10:56.069 align:start position:0%
female as if trans women are artificial
women<00:10:54.240><c> is</c><00:10:54.480><c> also</c><00:10:54.800><c> disgusting</c><00:10:55.440><c> transphobic</c>

00:10:56.069 --> 00:10:56.079 align:start position:0%
women is also disgusting transphobic
 

00:10:56.079 --> 00:10:58.069 align:start position:0%
women is also disgusting transphobic
language<00:10:56.399><c> that</c><00:10:56.640><c> makes</c><00:10:56.880><c> no</c><00:10:57.040><c> sense.</c><00:10:57.600><c> Yeah.</c><00:10:57.920><c> So,</c>

00:10:58.069 --> 00:10:58.079 align:start position:0%
language that makes no sense. Yeah. So,
 

00:10:58.079 --> 00:10:59.990 align:start position:0%
language that makes no sense. Yeah. So,
Nara<00:10:58.640><c> believes</c><00:10:58.880><c> that</c><00:10:58.959><c> the</c><00:10:59.120><c> label</c><00:10:59.440><c> biological</c>

00:10:59.990 --> 00:11:00.000 align:start position:0%
Nara believes that the label biological
 

00:11:00.000 --> 00:11:02.069 align:start position:0%
Nara believes that the label biological
female<00:11:00.399><c> is</c><00:11:00.720><c> disgusting</c><00:11:01.200><c> and</c><00:11:01.440><c> transphobic</c>

00:11:02.069 --> 00:11:02.079 align:start position:0%
female is disgusting and transphobic
 

00:11:02.079 --> 00:11:03.990 align:start position:0%
female is disgusting and transphobic
because<00:11:02.399><c> it</c><00:11:02.640><c> implies</c><00:11:02.959><c> that</c><00:11:03.279><c> trans</c><00:11:03.519><c> women</c><00:11:03.839><c> are</c>

00:11:03.990 --> 00:11:04.000 align:start position:0%
because it implies that trans women are
 

00:11:04.000 --> 00:11:05.670 align:start position:0%
because it implies that trans women are
not<00:11:04.160><c> biological</c><00:11:04.720><c> women,</c><00:11:05.040><c> they're</c><00:11:05.200><c> artificial</c>

00:11:05.670 --> 00:11:05.680 align:start position:0%
not biological women, they're artificial
 

00:11:05.680 --> 00:11:07.430 align:start position:0%
not biological women, they're artificial
women,<00:11:05.920><c> and</c><00:11:06.160><c> she</c><00:11:06.320><c> thinks</c><00:11:06.480><c> that's</c><00:11:06.720><c> bigoted.</c>

00:11:07.430 --> 00:11:07.440 align:start position:0%
women, and she thinks that's bigoted.
 

00:11:07.440 --> 00:11:08.870 align:start position:0%
women, and she thinks that's bigoted.
This<00:11:07.680><c> is</c><00:11:07.839><c> the</c><00:11:08.000><c> place</c><00:11:08.240><c> where</c><00:11:08.399><c> we</c><00:11:08.560><c> begin</c><00:11:08.720><c> to</c>

00:11:08.870 --> 00:11:08.880 align:start position:0%
This is the place where we begin to
 

00:11:08.880 --> 00:11:10.550 align:start position:0%
This is the place where we begin to
drill<00:11:09.120><c> down.</c><00:11:09.440><c> For</c><00:11:09.600><c> the</c><00:11:09.760><c> sake</c><00:11:09.920><c> of</c><00:11:10.000><c> argument,</c>

00:11:10.550 --> 00:11:10.560 align:start position:0%
drill down. For the sake of argument,
 

00:11:10.560 --> 00:11:12.310 align:start position:0%
drill down. For the sake of argument,
let's<00:11:10.800><c> take</c><00:11:10.959><c> the</c><00:11:11.360><c> ultimate</c><00:11:11.839><c> passing</c>

00:11:12.310 --> 00:11:12.320 align:start position:0%
let's take the ultimate passing
 

00:11:12.320 --> 00:11:14.150 align:start position:0%
let's take the ultimate passing
transwoman.<00:11:13.120><c> Everyone</c><00:11:13.440><c> liked</c><00:11:13.600><c> to</c><00:11:13.680><c> use</c><00:11:13.839><c> Blair</c>

00:11:14.150 --> 00:11:14.160 align:start position:0%
transwoman. Everyone liked to use Blair
 

00:11:14.160 --> 00:11:15.350 align:start position:0%
transwoman. Everyone liked to use Blair
White<00:11:14.320><c> for</c><00:11:14.399><c> this</c><00:11:14.560><c> back</c><00:11:14.720><c> in</c><00:11:14.880><c> the</c><00:11:14.959><c> day,</c><00:11:15.120><c> but</c>

00:11:15.350 --> 00:11:15.360 align:start position:0%
White for this back in the day, but
 

00:11:15.360 --> 00:11:16.710 align:start position:0%
White for this back in the day, but
frankly,<00:11:15.600><c> as</c><00:11:15.760><c> she's</c><00:11:16.000><c> gotten</c><00:11:16.160><c> more</c><00:11:16.399><c> plastic</c>

00:11:16.710 --> 00:11:16.720 align:start position:0%
frankly, as she's gotten more plastic
 

00:11:16.720 --> 00:11:18.310 align:start position:0%
frankly, as she's gotten more plastic
surgery,<00:11:17.200><c> she's</c><00:11:17.519><c> actually</c><00:11:17.760><c> looped</c><00:11:18.160><c> around</c>

00:11:18.310 --> 00:11:18.320 align:start position:0%
surgery, she's actually looped around
 

00:11:18.320 --> 00:11:20.150 align:start position:0%
surgery, she's actually looped around
and<00:11:18.480><c> begun</c><00:11:18.720><c> to</c><00:11:18.880><c> pass</c><00:11:19.120><c> less.</c><00:11:19.600><c> It's</c><00:11:19.839><c> like</c><00:11:19.920><c> she</c>

00:11:20.150 --> 00:11:20.160 align:start position:0%
and begun to pass less. It's like she
 

00:11:20.160 --> 00:11:22.150 align:start position:0%
and begun to pass less. It's like she
went<00:11:20.320><c> from</c><00:11:20.560><c> cute</c><00:11:20.959><c> transgirl</c><00:11:21.680><c> trying</c><00:11:21.839><c> to</c><00:11:22.000><c> look</c>

00:11:22.150 --> 00:11:22.160 align:start position:0%
went from cute transgirl trying to look
 

00:11:22.160 --> 00:11:24.150 align:start position:0%
went from cute transgirl trying to look
like<00:11:22.240><c> a</c><00:11:22.399><c> girl</c><00:11:22.640><c> to</c><00:11:22.959><c> transgirl</c><00:11:23.680><c> trying</c><00:11:23.920><c> to</c><00:11:24.000><c> look</c>

00:11:24.150 --> 00:11:24.160 align:start position:0%
like a girl to transgirl trying to look
 

00:11:24.160 --> 00:11:25.430 align:start position:0%
like a girl to transgirl trying to look
like<00:11:24.240><c> a</c><00:11:24.399><c> trans</c><00:11:24.560><c> girl,</c><00:11:24.880><c> if</c><00:11:25.040><c> that</c><00:11:25.120><c> makes</c><00:11:25.279><c> any</c>

00:11:25.430 --> 00:11:25.440 align:start position:0%
like a trans girl, if that makes any
 

00:11:25.440 --> 00:11:27.269 align:start position:0%
like a trans girl, if that makes any
sense.<00:11:25.839><c> So</c><00:11:26.000><c> instead,</c><00:11:26.399><c> let's</c><00:11:26.640><c> take</c><00:11:26.800><c> my</c><00:11:27.040><c> friend</c>

00:11:27.269 --> 00:11:27.279 align:start position:0%
sense. So instead, let's take my friend
 

00:11:27.279 --> 00:11:29.590 align:start position:0%
sense. So instead, let's take my friend
Taft,<00:11:28.000><c> who</c><00:11:28.240><c> is</c><00:11:28.480><c> pretty</c><00:11:28.800><c> much</c><00:11:29.040><c> everyone's</c>

00:11:29.590 --> 00:11:29.600 align:start position:0%
Taft, who is pretty much everyone's
 

00:11:29.600 --> 00:11:32.150 align:start position:0%
Taft, who is pretty much everyone's
transitioning<00:11:30.160><c> goals</c><00:11:30.480><c> nowadays.</c><00:11:31.360><c> So</c><00:11:31.839><c> what</c>

00:11:32.150 --> 00:11:32.160 align:start position:0%
transitioning goals nowadays. So what
 

00:11:32.160 --> 00:11:34.389 align:start position:0%
transitioning goals nowadays. So what
qualities<00:11:32.640><c> does</c><00:11:32.880><c> Taftage</c><00:11:33.600><c> share</c><00:11:33.839><c> with</c><00:11:34.079><c> sis</c>

00:11:34.389 --> 00:11:34.399 align:start position:0%
qualities does Taftage share with sis
 

00:11:34.399 --> 00:11:35.990 align:start position:0%
qualities does Taftage share with sis
women?<00:11:34.880><c> Well,</c><00:11:35.120><c> she</c><00:11:35.279><c> looks</c><00:11:35.440><c> like</c><00:11:35.600><c> them.</c><00:11:35.839><c> That's</c>

00:11:35.990 --> 00:11:36.000 align:start position:0%
women? Well, she looks like them. That's
 

00:11:36.000 --> 00:11:37.269 align:start position:0%
women? Well, she looks like them. That's
a<00:11:36.160><c> big</c><00:11:36.240><c> one.</c><00:11:36.560><c> It's</c><00:11:36.720><c> probably</c><00:11:36.880><c> the</c><00:11:37.120><c> most</c>

00:11:37.269 --> 00:11:37.279 align:start position:0%
a big one. It's probably the most
 

00:11:37.279 --> 00:11:38.710 align:start position:0%
a big one. It's probably the most
important<00:11:37.519><c> one</c><00:11:37.760><c> for</c><00:11:37.920><c> casual</c><00:11:38.320><c> everyday</c>

00:11:38.710 --> 00:11:38.720 align:start position:0%
important one for casual everyday
 

00:11:38.720 --> 00:11:40.389 align:start position:0%
important one for casual everyday
interaction.<00:11:39.360><c> She's</c><00:11:39.600><c> also</c><00:11:39.839><c> got</c><00:11:40.000><c> a</c><00:11:40.160><c> lot</c><00:11:40.240><c> of</c>

00:11:40.389 --> 00:11:40.399 align:start position:0%
interaction. She's also got a lot of
 

00:11:40.399 --> 00:11:42.550 align:start position:0%
interaction. She's also got a lot of
female<00:11:40.880><c> secondary</c><00:11:41.360><c> sex</c><00:11:41.680><c> characteristics.</c>

00:11:42.550 --> 00:11:42.560 align:start position:0%
female secondary sex characteristics.
 

00:11:42.560 --> 00:11:44.389 align:start position:0%
female secondary sex characteristics.
She<00:11:42.720><c> has</c><00:11:42.959><c> breasts.</c><00:11:43.440><c> She</c><00:11:43.600><c> has</c><00:11:43.680><c> a</c><00:11:43.839><c> feminine</c><00:11:44.160><c> body</c>

00:11:44.389 --> 00:11:44.399 align:start position:0%
She has breasts. She has a feminine body
 

00:11:44.399 --> 00:11:46.069 align:start position:0%
She has breasts. She has a feminine body
shape<00:11:44.640><c> with</c><00:11:44.800><c> appropriate</c><00:11:45.200><c> fat</c><00:11:45.519><c> distribution.</c>

00:11:46.069 --> 00:11:46.079 align:start position:0%
shape with appropriate fat distribution.
 

00:11:46.079 --> 00:11:47.350 align:start position:0%
shape with appropriate fat distribution.
She<00:11:46.240><c> has</c><00:11:46.320><c> a</c><00:11:46.399><c> higher</c><00:11:46.640><c> pitched</c><00:11:46.959><c> voice</c><00:11:47.200><c> and</c>

00:11:47.350 --> 00:11:47.360 align:start position:0%
She has a higher pitched voice and
 

00:11:47.360 --> 00:11:49.430 align:start position:0%
She has a higher pitched voice and
smoother<00:11:47.760><c> skin.</c><00:11:48.240><c> She</c><00:11:48.560><c> doesn't</c><00:11:48.800><c> have</c><00:11:49.040><c> male</c>

00:11:49.430 --> 00:11:49.440 align:start position:0%
smoother skin. She doesn't have male
 

00:11:49.440 --> 00:11:51.509 align:start position:0%
smoother skin. She doesn't have male
secondary<00:11:49.920><c> sex</c><00:11:50.160><c> characteristics.</c><00:11:51.040><c> She</c><00:11:51.279><c> grows</c>

00:11:51.509 --> 00:11:51.519 align:start position:0%
secondary sex characteristics. She grows
 

00:11:51.519 --> 00:11:53.269 align:start position:0%
secondary sex characteristics. She grows
no<00:11:51.760><c> facial</c><00:11:52.079><c> hair,</c><00:11:52.399><c> nor</c><00:11:52.640><c> is</c><00:11:52.800><c> she</c><00:11:52.959><c> beginning</c><00:11:53.120><c> to</c>

00:11:53.269 --> 00:11:53.279 align:start position:0%
no facial hair, nor is she beginning to
 

00:11:53.279 --> 00:11:55.030 align:start position:0%
no facial hair, nor is she beginning to
go<00:11:53.440><c> bald,</c><00:11:53.760><c> at</c><00:11:53.760><c> least</c><00:11:53.920><c> as</c><00:11:54.079><c> far</c><00:11:54.160><c> as</c><00:11:54.320><c> I</c><00:11:54.480><c> know.</c><00:11:54.800><c> She</c>

00:11:55.030 --> 00:11:55.040 align:start position:0%
go bald, at least as far as I know. She
 

00:11:55.040 --> 00:11:57.110 align:start position:0%
go bald, at least as far as I know. She
has<00:11:55.200><c> the</c><00:11:55.440><c> hormonal</c><00:11:56.000><c> profile</c><00:11:56.399><c> of</c><00:11:56.560><c> a</c><00:11:56.720><c> woman.</c><00:11:56.959><c> And</c>

00:11:57.110 --> 00:11:57.120 align:start position:0%
has the hormonal profile of a woman. And
 

00:11:57.120 --> 00:11:58.630 align:start position:0%
has the hormonal profile of a woman. And
if<00:11:57.279><c> you</c><00:11:57.360><c> want</c><00:11:57.440><c> to</c><00:11:57.519><c> call</c><00:11:57.680><c> that</c><00:11:58.000><c> hormonally</c>

00:11:58.630 --> 00:11:58.640 align:start position:0%
if you want to call that hormonally
 

00:11:58.640 --> 00:12:00.710 align:start position:0%
if you want to call that hormonally
female,<00:11:59.120><c> that</c><00:11:59.360><c> makes</c><00:11:59.519><c> sense</c><00:11:59.680><c> to</c><00:11:59.839><c> me.</c><00:12:00.320><c> However,</c>

00:12:00.710 --> 00:12:00.720 align:start position:0%
female, that makes sense to me. However,
 

00:12:00.720 --> 00:12:02.630 align:start position:0%
female, that makes sense to me. However,
there<00:12:01.040><c> are</c><00:12:01.279><c> also</c><00:12:01.600><c> things</c><00:12:01.839><c> that</c><00:12:02.000><c> sis</c><00:12:02.320><c> women</c>

00:12:02.630 --> 00:12:02.640 align:start position:0%
there are also things that sis women
 

00:12:02.640 --> 00:12:04.949 align:start position:0%
there are also things that sis women
have<00:12:02.959><c> that</c><00:12:03.200><c> Taftage</c><00:12:03.920><c> just</c><00:12:04.160><c> doesn't.</c><00:12:04.800><c> There</c>

00:12:04.949 --> 00:12:04.959 align:start position:0%
have that Taftage just doesn't. There
 

00:12:04.959 --> 00:12:06.790 align:start position:0%
have that Taftage just doesn't. There
are<00:12:05.200><c> some</c><00:12:05.360><c> parts</c><00:12:05.680><c> of</c><00:12:05.839><c> being</c><00:12:06.160><c> female</c><00:12:06.560><c> that</c>

00:12:06.790 --> 00:12:06.800 align:start position:0%
are some parts of being female that
 

00:12:06.800 --> 00:12:09.590 align:start position:0%
are some parts of being female that
Taftage<00:12:07.440><c> lacks.</c><00:12:08.000><c> The</c><00:12:08.240><c> big</c><00:12:08.399><c> one</c><00:12:08.639><c> is</c><00:12:08.959><c> gameamtes.</c>

00:12:09.590 --> 00:12:09.600 align:start position:0%
Taftage lacks. The big one is gameamtes.
 

00:12:09.600 --> 00:12:11.110 align:start position:0%
Taftage lacks. The big one is gameamtes.
And<00:12:09.680><c> Nara</c><00:12:10.160><c> thinks</c><00:12:10.320><c> that</c><00:12:10.399><c> using</c><00:12:10.639><c> gametes</c>

00:12:11.110 --> 00:12:11.120 align:start position:0%
And Nara thinks that using gametes
 

00:12:11.120 --> 00:12:12.470 align:start position:0%
And Nara thinks that using gametes
doesn't<00:12:11.279><c> work,</c><00:12:11.519><c> but</c><00:12:11.680><c> I</c><00:12:11.839><c> think</c><00:12:11.920><c> I</c><00:12:12.079><c> can</c><00:12:12.160><c> show</c><00:12:12.320><c> how</c>

00:12:12.470 --> 00:12:12.480 align:start position:0%
doesn't work, but I think I can show how
 

00:12:12.480 --> 00:12:14.470 align:start position:0%
doesn't work, but I think I can show how
it<00:12:12.639><c> does.</c><00:12:13.120><c> When</c><00:12:13.360><c> we</c><00:12:13.519><c> talk</c><00:12:13.680><c> about</c><00:12:13.839><c> any</c><00:12:14.160><c> other</c>

00:12:14.470 --> 00:12:14.480 align:start position:0%
it does. When we talk about any other
 

00:12:14.480 --> 00:12:16.230 align:start position:0%
it does. When we talk about any other
animal<00:12:14.800><c> species</c><00:12:15.200><c> in</c><00:12:15.360><c> the</c><00:12:15.519><c> planet,</c><00:12:15.920><c> when</c><00:12:16.079><c> we</c>

00:12:16.230 --> 00:12:16.240 align:start position:0%
animal species in the planet, when we
 

00:12:16.240 --> 00:12:18.470 align:start position:0%
animal species in the planet, when we
say<00:12:16.399><c> female,</c><00:12:16.959><c> what</c><00:12:17.200><c> we</c><00:12:17.360><c> mean</c><00:12:17.519><c> is</c><00:12:17.839><c> the</c><00:12:18.079><c> sex</c><00:12:18.320><c> of</c>

00:12:18.470 --> 00:12:18.480 align:start position:0%
say female, what we mean is the sex of
 

00:12:18.480 --> 00:12:19.670 align:start position:0%
say female, what we mean is the sex of
that<00:12:18.639><c> species</c><00:12:18.959><c> that</c><00:12:19.120><c> produces</c><00:12:19.519><c> large</c>

00:12:19.670 --> 00:12:19.680 align:start position:0%
that species that produces large
 

00:12:19.680 --> 00:12:21.030 align:start position:0%
that species that produces large
gametes.<00:12:20.240><c> And</c><00:12:20.320><c> the</c><00:12:20.480><c> same</c><00:12:20.560><c> with</c><00:12:20.720><c> male</c>

00:12:21.030 --> 00:12:21.040 align:start position:0%
gametes. And the same with male
 

00:12:21.040 --> 00:12:22.629 align:start position:0%
gametes. And the same with male
producing<00:12:21.360><c> small</c><00:12:21.600><c> gametes,</c><00:12:22.160><c> it's</c><00:12:22.399><c> not</c>

00:12:22.629 --> 00:12:22.639 align:start position:0%
producing small gametes, it's not
 

00:12:22.639 --> 00:12:24.550 align:start position:0%
producing small gametes, it's not
chromosomes.<00:12:23.440><c> You</c><00:12:23.600><c> can't</c><00:12:23.839><c> say</c><00:12:24.000><c> that</c><00:12:24.160><c> a</c><00:12:24.320><c> male</c>

00:12:24.550 --> 00:12:24.560 align:start position:0%
chromosomes. You can't say that a male
 

00:12:24.560 --> 00:12:26.310 align:start position:0%
chromosomes. You can't say that a male
is<00:12:24.720><c> a</c><00:12:24.880><c> member</c><00:12:25.040><c> of</c><00:12:25.200><c> the</c><00:12:25.360><c> species</c><00:12:25.680><c> with</c><00:12:25.839><c> XY</c>

00:12:26.310 --> 00:12:26.320 align:start position:0%
is a member of the species with XY
 

00:12:26.320 --> 00:12:28.470 align:start position:0%
is a member of the species with XY
chromosomes<00:12:26.959><c> because,</c><00:12:27.279><c> for</c><00:12:27.440><c> example,</c><00:12:28.079><c> birds</c>

00:12:28.470 --> 00:12:28.480 align:start position:0%
chromosomes because, for example, birds
 

00:12:28.480 --> 00:12:30.790 align:start position:0%
chromosomes because, for example, birds
use<00:12:28.720><c> a</c><00:12:28.959><c> WZ</c><00:12:29.600><c> chromosomal</c><00:12:30.240><c> system</c><00:12:30.480><c> and</c><00:12:30.639><c> they</c>

00:12:30.790 --> 00:12:30.800 align:start position:0%
use a WZ chromosomal system and they
 

00:12:30.800 --> 00:12:32.470 align:start position:0%
use a WZ chromosomal system and they
still<00:12:30.959><c> have</c><00:12:31.040><c> males</c><00:12:31.279><c> and</c><00:12:31.519><c> females.</c><00:12:32.000><c> It's</c><00:12:32.240><c> also</c>

00:12:32.470 --> 00:12:32.480 align:start position:0%
still have males and females. It's also
 

00:12:32.480 --> 00:12:34.150 align:start position:0%
still have males and females. It's also
not<00:12:32.639><c> genitals</c><00:12:33.200><c> because,</c><00:12:33.519><c> for</c><00:12:33.600><c> example,</c>

00:12:34.150 --> 00:12:34.160 align:start position:0%
not genitals because, for example,
 

00:12:34.160 --> 00:12:36.550 align:start position:0%
not genitals because, for example,
female<00:12:34.560><c> hyenas</c><00:12:35.120><c> have</c><00:12:35.279><c> penises.</c><00:12:36.000><c> If</c><00:12:36.240><c> we</c><00:12:36.399><c> are</c>

00:12:36.550 --> 00:12:36.560 align:start position:0%
female hyenas have penises. If we are
 

00:12:36.560 --> 00:12:38.389 align:start position:0%
female hyenas have penises. If we are
having<00:12:36.720><c> a</c><00:12:36.959><c> biological</c><00:12:37.600><c> discussion,</c><00:12:38.000><c> it</c><00:12:38.240><c> is</c>

00:12:38.389 --> 00:12:38.399 align:start position:0%
having a biological discussion, it is
 

00:12:38.399 --> 00:12:40.389 align:start position:0%
having a biological discussion, it is
gameamt<00:12:38.800><c> production.</c><00:12:39.360><c> That's</c><00:12:39.600><c> it.</c><00:12:40.000><c> What</c><00:12:40.240><c> this</c>

00:12:40.389 --> 00:12:40.399 align:start position:0%
gameamt production. That's it. What this
 

00:12:40.399 --> 00:12:42.310 align:start position:0%
gameamt production. That's it. What this
also<00:12:40.639><c> means</c><00:12:40.880><c> is</c><00:12:41.120><c> that</c><00:12:41.279><c> although</c><00:12:41.680><c> humans</c><00:12:42.160><c> have</c>

00:12:42.310 --> 00:12:42.320 align:start position:0%
also means is that although humans have
 

00:12:42.320 --> 00:12:44.310 align:start position:0%
also means is that although humans have
two<00:12:42.560><c> sexes,</c><00:12:43.040><c> the</c><00:12:43.279><c> large</c><00:12:43.519><c> gameamt</c><00:12:44.000><c> producers</c>

00:12:44.310 --> 00:12:44.320 align:start position:0%
two sexes, the large gameamt producers
 

00:12:44.320 --> 00:12:46.069 align:start position:0%
two sexes, the large gameamt producers
and<00:12:44.480><c> the</c><00:12:44.639><c> small</c><00:12:44.800><c> gameamt</c><00:12:45.279><c> producers.</c><00:12:45.760><c> It</c><00:12:45.920><c> also</c>

00:12:46.069 --> 00:12:46.079 align:start position:0%
and the small gameamt producers. It also
 

00:12:46.079 --> 00:12:47.590 align:start position:0%
and the small gameamt producers. It also
stands<00:12:46.399><c> to</c><00:12:46.560><c> reason</c><00:12:46.720><c> that</c><00:12:46.959><c> hypothetically</c>

00:12:47.590 --> 00:12:47.600 align:start position:0%
stands to reason that hypothetically
 

00:12:47.600 --> 00:12:49.350 align:start position:0%
stands to reason that hypothetically
there<00:12:47.839><c> can</c><00:12:48.000><c> be</c><00:12:48.079><c> humans</c><00:12:48.399><c> that</c><00:12:48.639><c> produce</c><00:12:49.040><c> both</c>

00:12:49.350 --> 00:12:49.360 align:start position:0%
there can be humans that produce both
 

00:12:49.360 --> 00:12:51.030 align:start position:0%
there can be humans that produce both
large<00:12:49.680><c> and</c><00:12:49.839><c> small</c><00:12:50.079><c> gametes</c><00:12:50.480><c> at</c><00:12:50.560><c> the</c><00:12:50.720><c> same</c><00:12:50.800><c> time</c>

00:12:51.030 --> 00:12:51.040 align:start position:0%
large and small gametes at the same time
 

00:12:51.040 --> 00:12:53.350 align:start position:0%
large and small gametes at the same time
and<00:12:51.279><c> also</c><00:12:51.519><c> humans</c><00:12:51.839><c> that</c><00:12:52.000><c> produce</c><00:12:52.320><c> no</c><00:12:52.560><c> gametes.</c>

00:12:53.350 --> 00:12:53.360 align:start position:0%
and also humans that produce no gametes.
 

00:12:53.360 --> 00:12:55.190 align:start position:0%
and also humans that produce no gametes.
These<00:12:53.680><c> two</c><00:12:54.000><c> extra</c><00:12:54.399><c> classifications</c>

00:12:55.190 --> 00:12:55.200 align:start position:0%
These two extra classifications
 

00:12:55.200 --> 00:12:57.269 align:start position:0%
These two extra classifications
rationally<00:12:55.760><c> make</c><00:12:56.000><c> sense.</c><00:12:56.560><c> Now</c><00:12:56.800><c> in</c><00:12:56.959><c> the</c><00:12:57.120><c> real</c>

00:12:57.269 --> 00:12:57.279 align:start position:0%
rationally make sense. Now in the real
 

00:12:57.279 --> 00:12:59.190 align:start position:0%
rationally make sense. Now in the real
world,<00:12:57.680><c> humans</c><00:12:58.000><c> that</c><00:12:58.160><c> produce</c><00:12:58.399><c> no</c><00:12:58.639><c> gametes</c><00:12:59.120><c> at</c>

00:12:59.190 --> 00:12:59.200 align:start position:0%
world, humans that produce no gametes at
 

00:12:59.200 --> 00:13:00.629 align:start position:0%
world, humans that produce no gametes at
all<00:12:59.279><c> throughout</c><00:12:59.600><c> their</c><00:12:59.760><c> entire</c><00:13:00.079><c> life</c><00:13:00.320><c> are</c>

00:13:00.629 --> 00:13:00.639 align:start position:0%
all throughout their entire life are
 

00:13:00.639 --> 00:13:02.310 align:start position:0%
all throughout their entire life are
considered<00:13:00.959><c> neuter,</c><00:13:01.519><c> neither</c><00:13:01.760><c> male</c><00:13:02.079><c> nor</c>

00:13:02.310 --> 00:13:02.320 align:start position:0%
considered neuter, neither male nor
 

00:13:02.320 --> 00:13:04.150 align:start position:0%
considered neuter, neither male nor
female.<00:13:02.720><c> And</c><00:13:02.880><c> to</c><00:13:03.120><c> date,</c><00:13:03.360><c> we</c><00:13:03.600><c> have</c><00:13:03.760><c> not</c><00:13:03.920><c> yet</c>

00:13:04.150 --> 00:13:04.160 align:start position:0%
female. And to date, we have not yet
 

00:13:04.160 --> 00:13:06.230 align:start position:0%
female. And to date, we have not yet
observed<00:13:04.720><c> any</c><00:13:04.959><c> type</c><00:13:05.120><c> of</c><00:13:05.279><c> interex</c><00:13:05.839><c> condition</c>

00:13:06.230 --> 00:13:06.240 align:start position:0%
observed any type of interex condition
 

00:13:06.240 --> 00:13:08.470 align:start position:0%
observed any type of interex condition
that<00:13:06.560><c> actually</c><00:13:06.880><c> allows</c><00:13:07.360><c> somebody</c><00:13:07.680><c> to</c><00:13:07.839><c> produce</c>

00:13:08.470 --> 00:13:08.480 align:start position:0%
that actually allows somebody to produce
 

00:13:08.480 --> 00:13:10.710 align:start position:0%
that actually allows somebody to produce
both<00:13:08.800><c> types</c><00:13:09.040><c> of</c><00:13:09.200><c> gameamtes.</c><00:13:09.920><c> We've</c><00:13:10.240><c> only</c><00:13:10.480><c> ever</c>

00:13:10.710 --> 00:13:10.720 align:start position:0%
both types of gameamtes. We've only ever
 

00:13:10.720 --> 00:13:13.110 align:start position:0%
both types of gameamtes. We've only ever
seen<00:13:10.959><c> people</c><00:13:11.200><c> who</c><00:13:11.440><c> produce</c><00:13:11.839><c> one</c><00:13:12.160><c> or</c><00:13:12.480><c> none.</c><00:13:12.959><c> In</c>

00:13:13.110 --> 00:13:13.120 align:start position:0%
seen people who produce one or none. In
 

00:13:13.120 --> 00:13:14.710 align:start position:0%
seen people who produce one or none. In
other<00:13:13.279><c> words,</c><00:13:13.600><c> while</c><00:13:13.839><c> humans</c><00:13:14.240><c> have</c><00:13:14.480><c> two</c>

00:13:14.710 --> 00:13:14.720 align:start position:0%
other words, while humans have two
 

00:13:14.720 --> 00:13:16.790 align:start position:0%
other words, while humans have two
sexes,<00:13:15.360><c> we</c><00:13:15.519><c> theoretically</c><00:13:16.160><c> have</c><00:13:16.480><c> four</c>

00:13:16.790 --> 00:13:16.800 align:start position:0%
sexes, we theoretically have four
 

00:13:16.800 --> 00:13:18.710 align:start position:0%
sexes, we theoretically have four
possible<00:13:17.279><c> sex</c><00:13:17.600><c> groupings,</c><00:13:18.240><c> for</c><00:13:18.399><c> lack</c><00:13:18.480><c> of</c><00:13:18.560><c> a</c>

00:13:18.710 --> 00:13:18.720 align:start position:0%
possible sex groupings, for lack of a
 

00:13:18.720 --> 00:13:20.470 align:start position:0%
possible sex groupings, for lack of a
better<00:13:18.959><c> term.</c><00:13:19.279><c> Male,</c><00:13:19.680><c> female,</c><00:13:20.079><c> both,</c><00:13:20.320><c> or</c>

00:13:20.470 --> 00:13:20.480 align:start position:0%
better term. Male, female, both, or
 

00:13:20.480 --> 00:13:22.230 align:start position:0%
better term. Male, female, both, or
neither.<00:13:20.959><c> And</c><00:13:21.120><c> in</c><00:13:21.279><c> reality,</c><00:13:21.600><c> we've</c><00:13:21.839><c> only</c><00:13:22.000><c> ever</c>

00:13:22.230 --> 00:13:22.240 align:start position:0%
neither. And in reality, we've only ever
 

00:13:22.240 --> 00:13:24.389 align:start position:0%
neither. And in reality, we've only ever
observed<00:13:22.800><c> three</c><00:13:22.959><c> of</c><00:13:23.120><c> these:</c><00:13:23.600><c> male,</c><00:13:24.000><c> female,</c>

00:13:24.389 --> 00:13:24.399 align:start position:0%
observed three of these: male, female,
 

00:13:24.399 --> 00:13:26.230 align:start position:0%
observed three of these: male, female,
and<00:13:24.560><c> neither.</c><00:13:25.040><c> When</c><00:13:25.279><c> people</c><00:13:25.519><c> say</c><00:13:25.680><c> the</c><00:13:25.920><c> phrase</c>

00:13:26.230 --> 00:13:26.240 align:start position:0%
and neither. When people say the phrase
 

00:13:26.240 --> 00:13:28.470 align:start position:0%
and neither. When people say the phrase
biological<00:13:26.959><c> female</c><00:13:27.279><c> or</c><00:13:27.519><c> biological</c><00:13:28.000><c> male,</c>

00:13:28.470 --> 00:13:28.480 align:start position:0%
biological female or biological male,
 

00:13:28.480 --> 00:13:29.990 align:start position:0%
biological female or biological male,
this<00:13:28.639><c> is</c><00:13:28.720><c> what</c><00:13:28.880><c> they're</c><00:13:29.120><c> referring</c><00:13:29.360><c> to.</c><00:13:29.760><c> Not</c>

00:13:29.990 --> 00:13:30.000 align:start position:0%
this is what they're referring to. Not
 

00:13:30.000 --> 00:13:32.230 align:start position:0%
this is what they're referring to. Not
hormone<00:13:30.399><c> profiles,</c><00:13:31.040><c> not</c><00:13:31.279><c> passing.</c><00:13:31.839><c> It's</c><00:13:32.079><c> the</c>

00:13:32.230 --> 00:13:32.240 align:start position:0%
hormone profiles, not passing. It's the
 

00:13:32.240 --> 00:13:34.470 align:start position:0%
hormone profiles, not passing. It's the
part<00:13:32.399><c> of</c><00:13:32.639><c> being</c><00:13:32.880><c> a</c><00:13:33.120><c> female</c><00:13:33.440><c> or</c><00:13:33.760><c> a</c><00:13:33.920><c> male</c><00:13:34.160><c> that</c>

00:13:34.470 --> 00:13:34.480 align:start position:0%
part of being a female or a male that
 

00:13:34.480 --> 00:13:35.829 align:start position:0%
part of being a female or a male that
cannot<00:13:34.800><c> be</c><00:13:34.959><c> replicated</c><00:13:35.360><c> with</c><00:13:35.519><c> current</c>

00:13:35.829 --> 00:13:35.839 align:start position:0%
cannot be replicated with current
 

00:13:35.839 --> 00:13:38.150 align:start position:0%
cannot be replicated with current
technology,<00:13:36.320><c> but</c><00:13:36.639><c> is</c><00:13:36.800><c> a</c><00:13:36.959><c> part</c><00:13:37.120><c> of</c><00:13:37.360><c> only</c><00:13:37.839><c> some</c>

00:13:38.150 --> 00:13:38.160 align:start position:0%
technology, but is a part of only some
 

00:13:38.160 --> 00:13:40.150 align:start position:0%
technology, but is a part of only some
humans<00:13:38.720><c> by</c><00:13:38.959><c> the</c><00:13:39.120><c> random</c><00:13:39.519><c> chance</c><00:13:39.760><c> of</c><00:13:40.000><c> their</c>

00:13:40.150 --> 00:13:40.160 align:start position:0%
humans by the random chance of their
 

00:13:40.160 --> 00:13:42.150 align:start position:0%
humans by the random chance of their
birth.<00:13:40.720><c> When</c><00:13:40.959><c> someone</c><00:13:41.200><c> like</c><00:13:41.360><c> Niara</c><00:13:41.839><c> makes</c><00:13:42.000><c> the</c>

00:13:42.150 --> 00:13:42.160 align:start position:0%
birth. When someone like Niara makes the
 

00:13:42.160 --> 00:13:43.509 align:start position:0%
birth. When someone like Niara makes the
statement,<00:13:42.399><c> "Trans</c><00:13:42.880><c> women</c><00:13:43.040><c> are</c><00:13:43.200><c> women,"</c>

00:13:43.509 --> 00:13:43.519 align:start position:0%
statement, "Trans women are women,"
 

00:13:43.519 --> 00:13:45.590 align:start position:0%
statement, "Trans women are women,"
what's<00:13:43.839><c> actually</c><00:13:44.160><c> being</c><00:13:44.480><c> said</c><00:13:44.800><c> is,</c><00:13:45.279><c> even</c><00:13:45.519><c> if</c>

00:13:45.590 --> 00:13:45.600 align:start position:0%
what's actually being said is, even if
 

00:13:45.600 --> 00:13:47.509 align:start position:0%
what's actually being said is, even if
they<00:13:45.839><c> don't</c><00:13:45.920><c> know</c><00:13:46.000><c> it,</c><00:13:46.399><c> trans</c><00:13:46.720><c> women</c><00:13:46.959><c> and</c><00:13:47.200><c> sis</c>

00:13:47.509 --> 00:13:47.519 align:start position:0%
they don't know it, trans women and sis
 

00:13:47.519 --> 00:13:49.509 align:start position:0%
they don't know it, trans women and sis
women<00:13:47.839><c> have</c><00:13:48.079><c> enough</c><00:13:48.399><c> in</c><00:13:48.639><c> common</c><00:13:48.959><c> that</c><00:13:49.279><c> they</c>

00:13:49.509 --> 00:13:49.519 align:start position:0%
women have enough in common that they
 

00:13:49.519 --> 00:13:50.949 align:start position:0%
women have enough in common that they
should<00:13:49.760><c> be</c><00:13:50.000><c> placed</c><00:13:50.240><c> into</c><00:13:50.560><c> the</c><00:13:50.720><c> same</c>

00:13:50.949 --> 00:13:50.959 align:start position:0%
should be placed into the same
 

00:13:50.959 --> 00:13:52.550 align:start position:0%
should be placed into the same
classification.<00:13:51.760><c> And</c><00:13:51.920><c> looking</c><00:13:52.079><c> at</c><00:13:52.240><c> Taft</c>

00:13:52.550 --> 00:13:52.560 align:start position:0%
classification. And looking at Taft
 

00:13:52.560 --> 00:13:54.310 align:start position:0%
classification. And looking at Taft
Hatch<00:13:52.800><c> again,</c><00:13:53.120><c> you</c><00:13:53.279><c> can</c><00:13:53.360><c> see</c><00:13:53.519><c> the</c><00:13:53.760><c> best</c><00:13:54.079><c> case</c>

00:13:54.310 --> 00:13:54.320 align:start position:0%
Hatch again, you can see the best case
 

00:13:54.320 --> 00:13:56.310 align:start position:0%
Hatch again, you can see the best case
argument<00:13:54.639><c> for</c><00:13:54.880><c> this,</c><00:13:55.200><c> plain</c><00:13:55.440><c> as</c><00:13:55.600><c> day.</c><00:13:56.079><c> She</c>

00:13:56.310 --> 00:13:56.320 align:start position:0%
argument for this, plain as day. She
 

00:13:56.320 --> 00:13:57.829 align:start position:0%
argument for this, plain as day. She
obviously<00:13:56.720><c> has</c><00:13:56.800><c> a</c><00:13:56.959><c> lot</c><00:13:57.040><c> in</c><00:13:57.199><c> common</c><00:13:57.360><c> with</c><00:13:57.600><c> sis</c>

00:13:57.829 --> 00:13:57.839 align:start position:0%
obviously has a lot in common with sis
 

00:13:57.839 --> 00:13:59.430 align:start position:0%
obviously has a lot in common with sis
women.<00:13:58.160><c> She</c><00:13:58.399><c> looks</c><00:13:58.560><c> like</c><00:13:58.720><c> one.</c><00:13:59.040><c> She</c><00:13:59.199><c> has</c><00:13:59.279><c> the</c>

00:13:59.430 --> 00:13:59.440 align:start position:0%
women. She looks like one. She has the
 

00:13:59.440 --> 00:14:01.030 align:start position:0%
women. She looks like one. She has the
secondary<00:13:59.839><c> sex</c><00:14:00.079><c> characteristics</c><00:14:00.560><c> of</c><00:14:00.720><c> one.</c>

00:14:01.030 --> 00:14:01.040 align:start position:0%
secondary sex characteristics of one.
 

00:14:01.040 --> 00:14:02.870 align:start position:0%
secondary sex characteristics of one.
She<00:14:01.199><c> has</c><00:14:01.279><c> the</c><00:14:01.440><c> hormone</c><00:14:01.839><c> profile</c><00:14:02.240><c> of</c><00:14:02.399><c> one,</c><00:14:02.639><c> but</c>

00:14:02.870 --> 00:14:02.880 align:start position:0%
She has the hormone profile of one, but
 

00:14:02.880 --> 00:14:04.310 align:start position:0%
She has the hormone profile of one, but
she<00:14:03.120><c> does</c><00:14:03.279><c> not</c><00:14:03.519><c> have</c><00:14:03.680><c> the</c><00:14:03.839><c> reproductive</c>

00:14:04.310 --> 00:14:04.320 align:start position:0%
she does not have the reproductive
 

00:14:04.320 --> 00:14:06.069 align:start position:0%
she does not have the reproductive
capabilities<00:14:04.800><c> of</c><00:14:04.959><c> one.</c><00:14:05.360><c> She</c><00:14:05.600><c> doesn't</c><00:14:05.760><c> have</c><00:14:05.839><c> a</c>

00:14:06.069 --> 00:14:06.079 align:start position:0%
capabilities of one. She doesn't have a
 

00:14:06.079 --> 00:14:07.590 align:start position:0%
capabilities of one. She doesn't have a
uterus<00:14:06.399><c> that</c><00:14:06.560><c> sheds</c><00:14:06.800><c> its</c><00:14:06.959><c> lining</c><00:14:07.279><c> once</c><00:14:07.440><c> a</c>

00:14:07.590 --> 00:14:07.600 align:start position:0%
uterus that sheds its lining once a
 

00:14:07.600 --> 00:14:09.430 align:start position:0%
uterus that sheds its lining once a
month.<00:14:07.920><c> She</c><00:14:08.160><c> can't</c><00:14:08.399><c> get</c><00:14:08.639><c> pregnant</c><00:14:08.959><c> or</c><00:14:09.199><c> give</c>

00:14:09.430 --> 00:14:09.440 align:start position:0%
month. She can't get pregnant or give
 

00:14:09.440 --> 00:14:11.910 align:start position:0%
month. She can't get pregnant or give
birth.<00:14:10.000><c> So,</c><00:14:10.240><c> the</c><00:14:10.480><c> question</c><00:14:10.880><c> actually</c><00:14:11.199><c> is,</c>

00:14:11.910 --> 00:14:11.920 align:start position:0%
birth. So, the question actually is,
 

00:14:11.920 --> 00:14:13.910 align:start position:0%
birth. So, the question actually is,
should<00:14:12.320><c> trans</c><00:14:12.639><c> women</c><00:14:13.040><c> be</c><00:14:13.199><c> placed</c><00:14:13.440><c> into</c><00:14:13.760><c> the</c>

00:14:13.910 --> 00:14:13.920 align:start position:0%
should trans women be placed into the
 

00:14:13.920 --> 00:14:16.150 align:start position:0%
should trans women be placed into the
same<00:14:14.160><c> bucket</c><00:14:14.480><c> as</c><00:14:14.720><c> sis</c><00:14:15.040><c> women</c><00:14:15.360><c> based</c><00:14:15.680><c> on</c><00:14:15.839><c> all</c><00:14:16.079><c> of</c>

00:14:16.150 --> 00:14:16.160 align:start position:0%
same bucket as sis women based on all of
 

00:14:16.160 --> 00:14:18.230 align:start position:0%
same bucket as sis women based on all of
these<00:14:16.399><c> qualities</c><00:14:16.800><c> they</c><00:14:17.040><c> have</c><00:14:17.120><c> in</c><00:14:17.360><c> common,</c><00:14:17.839><c> or</c>

00:14:18.230 --> 00:14:18.240 align:start position:0%
these qualities they have in common, or
 

00:14:18.240 --> 00:14:19.509 align:start position:0%
these qualities they have in common, or
should<00:14:18.399><c> they</c><00:14:18.560><c> be</c><00:14:18.720><c> put</c><00:14:18.880><c> into</c><00:14:19.120><c> a</c><00:14:19.360><c> different</c>

00:14:19.509 --> 00:14:19.519 align:start position:0%
should they be put into a different
 

00:14:19.519 --> 00:14:21.269 align:start position:0%
should they be put into a different
bucket<00:14:19.920><c> based</c><00:14:20.160><c> on</c><00:14:20.320><c> the</c><00:14:20.480><c> qualities</c><00:14:20.880><c> they</c><00:14:21.120><c> don't</c>

00:14:21.269 --> 00:14:21.279 align:start position:0%
bucket based on the qualities they don't
 

00:14:21.279 --> 00:14:22.790 align:start position:0%
bucket based on the qualities they don't
have<00:14:21.440><c> in</c><00:14:21.680><c> common?</c><00:14:22.160><c> If</c><00:14:22.320><c> you're</c><00:14:22.480><c> approaching</c>

00:14:22.790 --> 00:14:22.800 align:start position:0%
have in common? If you're approaching
 

00:14:22.800 --> 00:14:24.870 align:start position:0%
have in common? If you're approaching
this<00:14:23.040><c> topic</c><00:14:23.360><c> honestly,</c><00:14:24.000><c> that's</c><00:14:24.399><c> actually</c><00:14:24.639><c> a</c>

00:14:24.870 --> 00:14:24.880 align:start position:0%
this topic honestly, that's actually a
 

00:14:24.880 --> 00:14:26.629 align:start position:0%
this topic honestly, that's actually a
pretty<00:14:25.120><c> complicated</c><00:14:25.680><c> question.</c><00:14:26.160><c> I</c><00:14:26.320><c> attempted</c>

00:14:26.629 --> 00:14:26.639 align:start position:0%
pretty complicated question. I attempted
 

00:14:26.639 --> 00:14:28.470 align:start position:0%
pretty complicated question. I attempted
to<00:14:26.800><c> answer</c><00:14:26.959><c> it</c><00:14:27.120><c> a</c><00:14:27.360><c> few</c><00:14:27.440><c> years</c><00:14:27.600><c> ago</c><00:14:27.839><c> in</c><00:14:28.079><c> my</c><00:14:28.320><c> video</c>

00:14:28.470 --> 00:14:28.480 align:start position:0%
to answer it a few years ago in my video
 

00:14:28.480 --> 00:14:29.910 align:start position:0%
to answer it a few years ago in my video
titled,<00:14:28.800><c> "Are</c><00:14:29.120><c> trans</c><00:14:29.360><c> women</c><00:14:29.680><c> actually</c>

00:14:29.910 --> 00:14:29.920 align:start position:0%
titled, "Are trans women actually
 

00:14:29.920 --> 00:14:31.269 align:start position:0%
titled, "Are trans women actually
Women?"<00:14:30.160><c> And</c><00:14:30.399><c> I</c><00:14:30.560><c> think</c><00:14:30.639><c> I</c><00:14:30.800><c> did</c><00:14:30.880><c> a</c><00:14:31.040><c> pretty</c><00:14:31.199><c> good</c>

00:14:31.269 --> 00:14:31.279 align:start position:0%
Women?" And I think I did a pretty good
 

00:14:31.279 --> 00:14:32.629 align:start position:0%
Women?" And I think I did a pretty good
job<00:14:31.440><c> of</c><00:14:31.600><c> it.</c><00:14:31.839><c> Feel</c><00:14:32.000><c> free</c><00:14:32.160><c> to</c><00:14:32.240><c> go</c><00:14:32.399><c> back</c><00:14:32.480><c> and</c>

00:14:32.629 --> 00:14:32.639 align:start position:0%
job of it. Feel free to go back and
 

00:14:32.639 --> 00:14:33.990 align:start position:0%
job of it. Feel free to go back and
watch<00:14:32.800><c> it</c><00:14:32.880><c> if</c><00:14:33.040><c> you</c><00:14:33.199><c> like.</c><00:14:33.440><c> But</c><00:14:33.600><c> today,</c><00:14:33.839><c> I'm</c>

00:14:33.990 --> 00:14:34.000 align:start position:0%
watch it if you like. But today, I'm
 

00:14:34.000 --> 00:14:35.110 align:start position:0%
watch it if you like. But today, I'm
approaching<00:14:34.240><c> the</c><00:14:34.399><c> question</c><00:14:34.560><c> from</c><00:14:34.720><c> a</c><00:14:34.880><c> slightly</c>

00:14:35.110 --> 00:14:35.120 align:start position:0%
approaching the question from a slightly
 

00:14:35.120 --> 00:14:36.310 align:start position:0%
approaching the question from a slightly
different<00:14:35.279><c> angle</c><00:14:35.600><c> in</c><00:14:35.760><c> a</c><00:14:35.920><c> way</c><00:14:36.000><c> that</c><00:14:36.160><c> will</c>

00:14:36.310 --> 00:14:36.320 align:start position:0%
different angle in a way that will
 

00:14:36.320 --> 00:14:37.670 align:start position:0%
different angle in a way that will
actually<00:14:36.560><c> help</c><00:14:36.720><c> us</c><00:14:36.880><c> pull</c><00:14:37.120><c> back</c><00:14:37.279><c> the</c><00:14:37.440><c> curtain</c>

00:14:37.670 --> 00:14:37.680 align:start position:0%
actually help us pull back the curtain
 

00:14:37.680 --> 00:14:39.509 align:start position:0%
actually help us pull back the curtain
on<00:14:37.839><c> Nara's</c><00:14:38.320><c> thinking</c><00:14:38.480><c> a</c><00:14:38.639><c> bit.</c><00:14:39.040><c> The</c><00:14:39.199><c> core</c>

00:14:39.509 --> 00:14:39.519 align:start position:0%
on Nara's thinking a bit. The core
 

00:14:39.519 --> 00:14:41.350 align:start position:0%
on Nara's thinking a bit. The core
argument<00:14:39.839><c> of</c><00:14:40.079><c> that</c><00:14:40.399><c> previous</c><00:14:40.800><c> video,</c><00:14:41.120><c> by</c><00:14:41.279><c> the</c>

00:14:41.350 --> 00:14:41.360 align:start position:0%
argument of that previous video, by the
 

00:14:41.360 --> 00:14:43.430 align:start position:0%
argument of that previous video, by the
way,<00:14:41.680><c> is</c><00:14:42.000><c> basically</c><00:14:42.320><c> that</c><00:14:42.560><c> the</c><00:14:42.720><c> whole</c><00:14:42.880><c> Loki's</c>

00:14:43.430 --> 00:14:43.440 align:start position:0%
way, is basically that the whole Loki's
 

00:14:43.440 --> 00:14:45.590 align:start position:0%
way, is basically that the whole Loki's
wager<00:14:43.760><c> thing</c><00:14:44.079><c> can</c><00:14:44.399><c> in</c><00:14:44.639><c> fact</c><00:14:44.880><c> be</c><00:14:45.040><c> turned</c><00:14:45.440><c> back</c>

00:14:45.590 --> 00:14:45.600 align:start position:0%
wager thing can in fact be turned back
 

00:14:45.600 --> 00:14:47.670 align:start position:0%
wager thing can in fact be turned back
on<00:14:45.839><c> Niara's</c><00:14:46.399><c> own</c><00:14:46.560><c> position.</c><00:14:47.120><c> She</c><00:14:47.360><c> said</c><00:14:47.519><c> that</c>

00:14:47.670 --> 00:14:47.680 align:start position:0%
on Niara's own position. She said that
 

00:14:47.680 --> 00:14:49.590 align:start position:0%
on Niara's own position. She said that
you<00:14:47.920><c> can't</c><00:14:48.000><c> go</c><00:14:48.240><c> by</c><00:14:48.480><c> gametes</c><00:14:49.040><c> because</c><00:14:49.279><c> sis</c>

00:14:49.590 --> 00:14:49.600 align:start position:0%
you can't go by gametes because sis
 

00:14:49.600 --> 00:14:51.189 align:start position:0%
you can't go by gametes because sis
women<00:14:49.760><c> who</c><00:14:49.920><c> have</c><00:14:50.079><c> had</c><00:14:50.160><c> their</c><00:14:50.320><c> ovaries</c><00:14:50.720><c> removed</c>

00:14:51.189 --> 00:14:51.199 align:start position:0%
women who have had their ovaries removed
 

00:14:51.199 --> 00:14:53.030 align:start position:0%
women who have had their ovaries removed
no<00:14:51.440><c> longer</c><00:14:51.680><c> produce</c><00:14:52.000><c> large</c><00:14:52.240><c> gametes,</c><00:14:52.880><c> meaning</c>

00:14:53.030 --> 00:14:53.040 align:start position:0%
no longer produce large gametes, meaning
 

00:14:53.040 --> 00:14:54.870 align:start position:0%
no longer produce large gametes, meaning
they're<00:14:53.279><c> no</c><00:14:53.440><c> longer</c><00:14:53.680><c> female.</c><00:14:54.320><c> Personally,</c>

00:14:54.870 --> 00:14:54.880 align:start position:0%
they're no longer female. Personally,
 

00:14:54.880 --> 00:14:56.150 align:start position:0%
they're no longer female. Personally,
I'm<00:14:55.120><c> actually</c><00:14:55.360><c> just</c><00:14:55.519><c> willing</c><00:14:55.760><c> to</c><00:14:55.920><c> totally</c>

00:14:56.150 --> 00:14:56.160 align:start position:0%
I'm actually just willing to totally
 

00:14:56.160 --> 00:14:57.670 align:start position:0%
I'm actually just willing to totally
bite<00:14:56.399><c> the</c><00:14:56.560><c> bullet</c><00:14:56.800><c> on</c><00:14:56.880><c> that,</c><00:14:57.120><c> by</c><00:14:57.279><c> the</c><00:14:57.360><c> way.</c>

00:14:57.670 --> 00:14:57.680 align:start position:0%
bite the bullet on that, by the way.
 

00:14:57.680 --> 00:14:59.509 align:start position:0%
bite the bullet on that, by the way.
Yeah,<00:14:57.920><c> they</c><00:14:58.079><c> become</c><00:14:58.320><c> neuter.</c><00:14:58.880><c> Nearly</c><00:14:59.279><c> every</c>

00:14:59.509 --> 00:14:59.519 align:start position:0%
Yeah, they become neuter. Nearly every
 

00:14:59.519 --> 00:15:01.350 align:start position:0%
Yeah, they become neuter. Nearly every
society<00:14:59.920><c> on</c><00:15:00.079><c> the</c><00:15:00.240><c> planet</c><00:15:00.560><c> has</c><00:15:00.800><c> accepted</c><00:15:01.120><c> this</c>

00:15:01.350 --> 00:15:01.360 align:start position:0%
society on the planet has accepted this
 

00:15:01.360 --> 00:15:02.949 align:start position:0%
society on the planet has accepted this
logic<00:15:01.680><c> for</c><00:15:01.920><c> males</c><00:15:02.320><c> who</c><00:15:02.480><c> lose</c><00:15:02.800><c> their</c>

00:15:02.949 --> 00:15:02.959 align:start position:0%
logic for males who lose their
 

00:15:02.959 --> 00:15:04.470 align:start position:0%
logic for males who lose their
testicles.<00:15:03.760><c> They</c><00:15:04.000><c> were</c><00:15:04.079><c> no</c><00:15:04.240><c> longer</c>

00:15:04.470 --> 00:15:04.480 align:start position:0%
testicles. They were no longer
 

00:15:04.480 --> 00:15:06.389 align:start position:0%
testicles. They were no longer
considered<00:15:04.880><c> male.</c><00:15:05.279><c> They</c><00:15:05.440><c> were</c><00:15:05.519><c> neuter.</c><00:15:06.079><c> Some</c>

00:15:06.389 --> 00:15:06.399 align:start position:0%
considered male. They were neuter. Some
 

00:15:06.399 --> 00:15:09.030 align:start position:0%
considered male. They were neuter. Some
even<00:15:06.720><c> had</c><00:15:06.959><c> specific</c><00:15:07.440><c> social</c><00:15:07.839><c> roles</c><00:15:08.160><c> for</c><00:15:08.480><c> Unix</c>

00:15:09.030 --> 00:15:09.040 align:start position:0%
even had specific social roles for Unix
 

00:15:09.040 --> 00:15:11.110 align:start position:0%
even had specific social roles for Unix
that<00:15:09.279><c> neither</c><00:15:09.680><c> men</c><00:15:09.920><c> nor</c><00:15:10.240><c> women</c><00:15:10.480><c> could</c><00:15:10.639><c> access.</c>

00:15:11.110 --> 00:15:11.120 align:start position:0%
that neither men nor women could access.
 

00:15:11.120 --> 00:15:13.430 align:start position:0%
that neither men nor women could access.
So<00:15:11.279><c> this</c><00:15:11.440><c> isn't</c><00:15:11.760><c> exactly</c><00:15:12.240><c> new</c><00:15:12.480><c> weird</c><00:15:12.880><c> logic</c><00:15:13.199><c> or</c>

00:15:13.430 --> 00:15:13.440 align:start position:0%
So this isn't exactly new weird logic or
 

00:15:13.440 --> 00:15:14.629 align:start position:0%
So this isn't exactly new weird logic or
anything.<00:15:13.760><c> We</c><00:15:13.920><c> understood</c><00:15:14.320><c> this</c><00:15:14.480><c> kind</c><00:15:14.560><c> of</c>

00:15:14.629 --> 00:15:14.639 align:start position:0%
anything. We understood this kind of
 

00:15:14.639 --> 00:15:16.470 align:start position:0%
anything. We understood this kind of
thing<00:15:14.800><c> for</c><00:15:14.959><c> a</c><00:15:15.120><c> while,</c><00:15:15.360><c> but</c><00:15:15.600><c> Niara's</c><00:15:16.240><c> position</c>

00:15:16.470 --> 00:15:16.480 align:start position:0%
thing for a while, but Niara's position
 

00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:18.310 align:start position:0%
thing for a while, but Niara's position
is<00:15:16.639><c> that</c><00:15:16.800><c> if</c><00:15:17.040><c> women</c><00:15:17.279><c> are</c><00:15:17.440><c> female</c><00:15:17.839><c> and</c><00:15:18.079><c> some</c>

00:15:18.310 --> 00:15:18.320 align:start position:0%
is that if women are female and some
 

00:15:18.320 --> 00:15:20.470 align:start position:0%
is that if women are female and some
females<00:15:18.800><c> lose</c><00:15:19.040><c> their</c><00:15:19.120><c> ovaries,</c><00:15:19.680><c> then</c><00:15:19.920><c> gametes</c>

00:15:20.470 --> 00:15:20.480 align:start position:0%
females lose their ovaries, then gametes
 

00:15:20.480 --> 00:15:22.230 align:start position:0%
females lose their ovaries, then gametes
can't<00:15:20.639><c> be</c><00:15:20.720><c> part</c><00:15:20.880><c> of</c><00:15:20.959><c> the</c><00:15:21.120><c> equation</c><00:15:21.680><c> because</c><00:15:22.000><c> a</c>

00:15:22.230 --> 00:15:22.240 align:start position:0%
can't be part of the equation because a
 

00:15:22.240 --> 00:15:24.629 align:start position:0%
can't be part of the equation because a
line<00:15:22.560><c> cannot</c><00:15:22.959><c> be</c><00:15:23.120><c> cleanly</c><00:15:23.600><c> drawn</c><00:15:23.920><c> between</c><00:15:24.320><c> all</c>

00:15:24.629 --> 00:15:24.639 align:start position:0%
line cannot be cleanly drawn between all
 

00:15:24.639 --> 00:15:26.870 align:start position:0%
line cannot be cleanly drawn between all
women<00:15:24.880><c> and</c><00:15:25.199><c> all</c><00:15:25.440><c> non-women</c><00:15:26.079><c> along</c><00:15:26.399><c> the</c><00:15:26.560><c> basis</c>

00:15:26.870 --> 00:15:26.880 align:start position:0%
women and all non-women along the basis
 

00:15:26.880 --> 00:15:29.030 align:start position:0%
women and all non-women along the basis
of<00:15:27.040><c> femaleness.</c><00:15:27.839><c> then</c><00:15:28.079><c> no</c><00:15:28.320><c> line</c><00:15:28.480><c> at</c><00:15:28.720><c> all</c><00:15:28.800><c> can</c>

00:15:29.030 --> 00:15:29.040 align:start position:0%
of femaleness. then no line at all can
 

00:15:29.040 --> 00:15:30.629 align:start position:0%
of femaleness. then no line at all can
be<00:15:29.120><c> drawn</c><00:15:29.519><c> which</c><00:15:29.760><c> means</c><00:15:29.920><c> that</c><00:15:30.160><c> the</c><00:15:30.399><c> only</c>

00:15:30.629 --> 00:15:30.639 align:start position:0%
be drawn which means that the only
 

00:15:30.639 --> 00:15:32.470 align:start position:0%
be drawn which means that the only
people<00:15:30.880><c> who</c><00:15:31.120><c> are</c><00:15:31.360><c> women</c><00:15:31.600><c> in</c><00:15:31.839><c> the</c><00:15:32.000><c> end</c><00:15:32.240><c> are</c>

00:15:32.470 --> 00:15:32.480 align:start position:0%
people who are women in the end are
 

00:15:32.480 --> 00:15:34.710 align:start position:0%
people who are women in the end are
those<00:15:32.720><c> who</c><00:15:32.959><c> self-identify</c><00:15:33.760><c> as</c><00:15:34.079><c> women</c><00:15:34.480><c> and</c>

00:15:34.710 --> 00:15:34.720 align:start position:0%
those who self-identify as women and
 

00:15:34.720 --> 00:15:36.230 align:start position:0%
those who self-identify as women and
even<00:15:35.040><c> she</c><00:15:35.279><c> knows</c><00:15:35.519><c> there's</c><00:15:35.760><c> a</c><00:15:35.920><c> problem</c><00:15:36.079><c> with</c>

00:15:36.230 --> 00:15:36.240 align:start position:0%
even she knows there's a problem with
 

00:15:36.240 --> 00:15:38.069 align:start position:0%
even she knows there's a problem with
this<00:15:36.639><c> as</c><00:15:36.800><c> I'm</c><00:15:37.040><c> sure</c><00:15:37.199><c> she's</c><00:15:37.440><c> heard</c><00:15:37.600><c> it</c><00:15:37.760><c> before</c>

00:15:38.069 --> 00:15:38.079 align:start position:0%
this as I'm sure she's heard it before
 

00:15:38.079 --> 00:15:40.310 align:start position:0%
this as I'm sure she's heard it before
that's<00:15:38.320><c> a</c><00:15:38.480><c> circular</c><00:15:38.800><c> definition</c><00:15:40.000><c> is</c><00:15:40.160><c> correct</c>

00:15:40.310 --> 00:15:40.320 align:start position:0%
that's a circular definition is correct
 

00:15:40.320 --> 00:15:41.910 align:start position:0%
that's a circular definition is correct
to<00:15:40.480><c> make</c><00:15:40.639><c> fun</c><00:15:40.800><c> of</c><00:15:40.959><c> this</c><00:15:41.120><c> idea</c><00:15:41.440><c> because</c><00:15:41.680><c> all</c>

00:15:41.910 --> 00:15:41.920 align:start position:0%
to make fun of this idea because all
 

00:15:41.920 --> 00:15:43.829 align:start position:0%
to make fun of this idea because all
definitions<00:15:42.399><c> are</c><00:15:42.639><c> circular</c><00:15:43.120><c> that's</c><00:15:43.360><c> true</c>

00:15:43.829 --> 00:15:43.839 align:start position:0%
definitions are circular that's true
 

00:15:43.839 --> 00:15:46.470 align:start position:0%
definitions are circular that's true
however<00:15:44.320><c> niara</c><00:15:44.880><c> is</c><00:15:45.120><c> still</c><00:15:45.360><c> wrong</c><00:15:46.000><c> even</c><00:15:46.240><c> though</c>

00:15:46.470 --> 00:15:46.480 align:start position:0%
however niara is still wrong even though
 

00:15:46.480 --> 00:15:48.470 align:start position:0%
however niara is still wrong even though
I'm<00:15:46.720><c> not</c><00:15:46.880><c> a</c><00:15:47.040><c> progressive</c><00:15:47.680><c> I</c><00:15:47.839><c> consider</c><00:15:48.160><c> myself</c>

00:15:48.470 --> 00:15:48.480 align:start position:0%
I'm not a progressive I consider myself
 

00:15:48.480 --> 00:15:50.389 align:start position:0%
I'm not a progressive I consider myself
lucky<00:15:48.800><c> that</c><00:15:49.040><c> I</c><00:15:49.199><c> got</c><00:15:49.360><c> to</c><00:15:49.440><c> enjoy</c><00:15:49.759><c> a</c><00:15:49.920><c> progressive</c>

00:15:50.389 --> 00:15:50.399 align:start position:0%
lucky that I got to enjoy a progressive
 

00:15:50.399 --> 00:15:52.150 align:start position:0%
lucky that I got to enjoy a progressive
university<00:15:50.800><c> education</c><00:15:51.519><c> one</c><00:15:51.680><c> of</c><00:15:51.759><c> the</c><00:15:51.920><c> first</c>

00:15:52.150 --> 00:15:52.160 align:start position:0%
university education one of the first
 

00:15:52.160 --> 00:15:53.590 align:start position:0%
university education one of the first
people<00:15:52.320><c> you</c><00:15:52.560><c> learn</c><00:15:52.800><c> about</c><00:15:53.040><c> when</c><00:15:53.279><c> learning</c>

00:15:53.590 --> 00:15:53.600 align:start position:0%
people you learn about when learning
 

00:15:53.600 --> 00:15:54.949 align:start position:0%
people you learn about when learning
critical<00:15:53.920><c> theory</c><00:15:54.240><c> is</c><00:15:54.480><c> the</c><00:15:54.639><c> French</c>

00:15:54.949 --> 00:15:54.959 align:start position:0%
critical theory is the French
 

00:15:54.959 --> 00:15:56.949 align:start position:0%
critical theory is the French
philosopher<00:15:55.600><c> Jacqu</c><00:15:55.920><c> Dereda</c><00:15:56.560><c> he's</c><00:15:56.720><c> the</c><00:15:56.880><c> guy</c>

00:15:56.949 --> 00:15:56.959 align:start position:0%
philosopher Jacqu Dereda he's the guy
 

00:15:56.959 --> 00:15:58.870 align:start position:0%
philosopher Jacqu Dereda he's the guy
that<00:15:57.120><c> we</c><00:15:57.279><c> get</c><00:15:57.440><c> deconstruction</c><00:15:58.000><c> from.</c><00:15:58.399><c> A</c><00:15:58.560><c> core</c>

00:15:58.870 --> 00:15:58.880 align:start position:0%
that we get deconstruction from. A core
 

00:15:58.880 --> 00:16:01.030 align:start position:0%
that we get deconstruction from. A core
part<00:15:59.040><c> of</c><00:15:59.279><c> deconstructive</c><00:16:00.000><c> analysis</c><00:16:00.560><c> is</c><00:16:00.800><c> the</c>

00:16:01.030 --> 00:16:01.040 align:start position:0%
part of deconstructive analysis is the
 

00:16:01.040 --> 00:16:03.269 align:start position:0%
part of deconstructive analysis is the
idea<00:16:01.279><c> of</c><00:16:01.600><c> difference.</c><00:16:02.480><c> Yes,</c><00:16:02.720><c> that's</c><00:16:02.959><c> just</c><00:16:03.120><c> the</c>

00:16:03.269 --> 00:16:03.279 align:start position:0%
idea of difference. Yes, that's just the
 

00:16:03.279 --> 00:16:04.790 align:start position:0%
idea of difference. Yes, that's just the
word<00:16:03.519><c> difference</c><00:16:03.920><c> with</c><00:16:04.160><c> a</c><00:16:04.320><c> bad</c><00:16:04.480><c> French</c>

00:16:04.790 --> 00:16:04.800 align:start position:0%
word difference with a bad French
 

00:16:04.800 --> 00:16:07.030 align:start position:0%
word difference with a bad French
accent.<00:16:05.360><c> But</c><00:16:05.440><c> it's</c><00:16:05.680><c> not</c><00:16:05.920><c> simply</c><00:16:06.240><c> the</c><00:16:06.480><c> idea</c><00:16:06.800><c> of</c>

00:16:07.030 --> 00:16:07.040 align:start position:0%
accent. But it's not simply the idea of
 

00:16:07.040 --> 00:16:08.870 align:start position:0%
accent. But it's not simply the idea of
difference.<00:16:07.759><c> Derided</c><00:16:08.320><c> purposefully</c>

00:16:08.870 --> 00:16:08.880 align:start position:0%
difference. Derided purposefully
 

00:16:08.880 --> 00:16:10.949 align:start position:0%
difference. Derided purposefully
misspelled<00:16:09.440><c> the</c><00:16:09.680><c> word</c><00:16:09.839><c> with</c><00:16:10.000><c> an</c><00:16:10.160><c> extra</c><00:16:10.480><c> a</c><00:16:10.720><c> in</c>

00:16:10.949 --> 00:16:10.959 align:start position:0%
misspelled the word with an extra a in
 

00:16:10.959 --> 00:16:12.710 align:start position:0%
misspelled the word with an extra a in
order<00:16:11.040><c> to</c><00:16:11.199><c> ground</c><00:16:11.440><c> the</c><00:16:11.680><c> idea</c><00:16:12.000><c> in</c><00:16:12.240><c> both</c><00:16:12.480><c> the</c>

00:16:12.710 --> 00:16:12.720 align:start position:0%
order to ground the idea in both the
 

00:16:12.720 --> 00:16:14.470 align:start position:0%
order to ground the idea in both the
French<00:16:13.040><c> word</c><00:16:13.279><c> for</c><00:16:13.519><c> differ</c><00:16:13.920><c> as</c><00:16:14.000><c> in</c><00:16:14.160><c> to</c><00:16:14.320><c> be</c>

00:16:14.470 --> 00:16:14.480 align:start position:0%
French word for differ as in to be
 

00:16:14.480 --> 00:16:16.870 align:start position:0%
French word for differ as in to be
unalike<00:16:15.040><c> and</c><00:16:15.199><c> the</c><00:16:15.440><c> French</c><00:16:15.680><c> word</c><00:16:15.920><c> for</c><00:16:16.160><c> defer</c><00:16:16.720><c> as</c>

00:16:16.870 --> 00:16:16.880 align:start position:0%
unalike and the French word for defer as
 

00:16:16.880 --> 00:16:18.710 align:start position:0%
unalike and the French word for defer as
in<00:16:17.040><c> to</c><00:16:17.199><c> postpone.</c><00:16:17.920><c> Difference</c><00:16:18.480><c> is</c>

00:16:18.710 --> 00:16:18.720 align:start position:0%
in to postpone. Difference is
 

00:16:18.720 --> 00:16:20.470 align:start position:0%
in to postpone. Difference is
recognizing<00:16:19.199><c> that</c><00:16:19.440><c> signs</c><00:16:19.839><c> are</c><00:16:20.000><c> not</c><00:16:20.240><c> identical</c>

00:16:20.470 --> 00:16:20.480 align:start position:0%
recognizing that signs are not identical
 

00:16:20.480 --> 00:16:22.389 align:start position:0%
recognizing that signs are not identical
with<00:16:20.639><c> what</c><00:16:20.800><c> they</c><00:16:20.959><c> signify.</c><00:16:21.600><c> They</c><00:16:21.839><c> gain</c><00:16:22.079><c> their</c>

00:16:22.389 --> 00:16:22.399 align:start position:0%
with what they signify. They gain their
 

00:16:22.399 --> 00:16:23.670 align:start position:0%
with what they signify. They gain their
meaning<00:16:22.720><c> through</c><00:16:22.959><c> their</c><00:16:23.199><c> differences</c><00:16:23.519><c> to</c>

00:16:23.670 --> 00:16:23.680 align:start position:0%
meaning through their differences to
 

00:16:23.680 --> 00:16:25.749 align:start position:0%
meaning through their differences to
other<00:16:23.920><c> signs.</c><00:16:24.560><c> Meaning</c><00:16:24.959><c> arises</c><00:16:25.440><c> from</c><00:16:25.600><c> the</c>

00:16:25.749 --> 00:16:25.759 align:start position:0%
other signs. Meaning arises from the
 

00:16:25.759 --> 00:16:27.670 align:start position:0%
other signs. Meaning arises from the
differentiation<00:16:26.399><c> of</c><00:16:26.720><c> one</c><00:16:26.880><c> sign</c><00:16:27.120><c> from</c><00:16:27.360><c> another</c>

00:16:27.670 --> 00:16:27.680 align:start position:0%
differentiation of one sign from another
 

00:16:27.680 --> 00:16:29.350 align:start position:0%
differentiation of one sign from another
and<00:16:27.920><c> through</c><00:16:28.160><c> a</c><00:16:28.320><c> constant</c><00:16:28.639><c> deferral</c><00:16:29.120><c> of</c>

00:16:29.350 --> 00:16:29.360 align:start position:0%
and through a constant deferral of
 

00:16:29.360 --> 00:16:31.590 align:start position:0%
and through a constant deferral of
meaning<00:16:29.680><c> along</c><00:16:30.000><c> a</c><00:16:30.240><c> chain</c><00:16:30.399><c> of</c><00:16:30.560><c> infinite</c><00:16:30.959><c> signs.</c>

00:16:31.590 --> 00:16:31.600 align:start position:0%
meaning along a chain of infinite signs.
 

00:16:31.600 --> 00:16:33.670 align:start position:0%
meaning along a chain of infinite signs.
Dereda<00:16:32.160><c> described</c><00:16:32.480><c> language</c><00:16:32.959><c> as</c><00:16:33.279><c> being</c><00:16:33.440><c> a</c>

00:16:33.670 --> 00:16:33.680 align:start position:0%
Dereda described language as being a
 

00:16:33.680 --> 00:16:35.350 align:start position:0%
Dereda described language as being a
series<00:16:33.920><c> of</c><00:16:34.079><c> life</c><00:16:34.399><c> rafts</c><00:16:34.800><c> in</c><00:16:34.880><c> the</c><00:16:35.040><c> ocean</c><00:16:35.199><c> that</c>

00:16:35.350 --> 00:16:35.360 align:start position:0%
series of life rafts in the ocean that
 

00:16:35.360 --> 00:16:37.110 align:start position:0%
series of life rafts in the ocean that
we<00:16:35.440><c> hop</c><00:16:35.680><c> between,</c><00:16:36.079><c> never</c><00:16:36.399><c> actually</c><00:16:36.720><c> arriving</c>

00:16:37.110 --> 00:16:37.120 align:start position:0%
we hop between, never actually arriving
 

00:16:37.120 --> 00:16:38.949 align:start position:0%
we hop between, never actually arriving
at<00:16:37.279><c> the</c><00:16:37.440><c> true</c><00:16:37.680><c> shoreline</c><00:16:38.079><c> of</c><00:16:38.160><c> the</c><00:16:38.320><c> real</c><00:16:38.560><c> world.</c>

00:16:38.949 --> 00:16:38.959 align:start position:0%
at the true shoreline of the real world.
 

00:16:38.959 --> 00:16:40.629 align:start position:0%
at the true shoreline of the real world.
Here's<00:16:39.199><c> the</c><00:16:39.440><c> example</c><00:16:39.680><c> my</c><00:16:39.920><c> professor</c><00:16:40.320><c> used</c><00:16:40.480><c> to</c>

00:16:40.629 --> 00:16:40.639 align:start position:0%
Here's the example my professor used to
 

00:16:40.639 --> 00:16:42.150 align:start position:0%
Here's the example my professor used to
describe<00:16:40.959><c> how</c><00:16:41.120><c> this</c><00:16:41.279><c> works.</c><00:16:41.759><c> There's</c><00:16:42.000><c> the</c>

00:16:42.150 --> 00:16:42.160 align:start position:0%
describe how this works. There's the
 

00:16:42.160 --> 00:16:44.230 align:start position:0%
describe how this works. There's the
sign,<00:16:42.560><c> in</c><00:16:42.720><c> this</c><00:16:42.880><c> case</c><00:16:43.040><c> the</c><00:16:43.199><c> word</c><00:16:43.519><c> be,</c><00:16:43.839><c> and</c><00:16:44.000><c> its</c>

00:16:44.230 --> 00:16:44.240 align:start position:0%
sign, in this case the word be, and its
 

00:16:44.240 --> 00:16:45.990 align:start position:0%
sign, in this case the word be, and its
real<00:16:44.480><c> world</c><00:16:44.720><c> corresponding</c><00:16:45.360><c> object,</c><00:16:45.759><c> the</c>

00:16:45.990 --> 00:16:46.000 align:start position:0%
real world corresponding object, the
 

00:16:46.000 --> 00:16:48.150 align:start position:0%
real world corresponding object, the
signified,<00:16:46.639><c> a</c><00:16:46.800><c> real</c><00:16:47.040><c> bee.</c><00:16:47.519><c> Why</c><00:16:47.680><c> is</c><00:16:47.839><c> it</c><00:16:48.000><c> that</c>

00:16:48.150 --> 00:16:48.160 align:start position:0%
signified, a real bee. Why is it that
 

00:16:48.160 --> 00:16:49.829 align:start position:0%
signified, a real bee. Why is it that
when<00:16:48.320><c> we</c><00:16:48.399><c> read</c><00:16:48.560><c> the</c><00:16:48.720><c> word</c><00:16:49.040><c> be,</c><00:16:49.360><c> we</c><00:16:49.600><c> understand</c>

00:16:49.829 --> 00:16:49.839 align:start position:0%
when we read the word be, we understand
 

00:16:49.839 --> 00:16:52.230 align:start position:0%
when we read the word be, we understand
its<00:16:50.160><c> meaning,</c><00:16:50.480><c> its</c><00:16:50.720><c> link</c><00:16:50.959><c> to</c><00:16:51.199><c> the</c><00:16:51.360><c> real</c><00:16:51.600><c> bee?</c>

00:16:52.230 --> 00:16:52.240 align:start position:0%
its meaning, its link to the real bee?
 

00:16:52.240 --> 00:16:54.230 align:start position:0%
its meaning, its link to the real bee?
Well,<00:16:52.560><c> my</c><00:16:52.800><c> professor</c><00:16:53.120><c> tasked</c><00:16:53.519><c> the</c><00:16:53.680><c> class</c><00:16:54.000><c> with</c>

00:16:54.230 --> 00:16:54.240 align:start position:0%
Well, my professor tasked the class with
 

00:16:54.240 --> 00:16:56.069 align:start position:0%
Well, my professor tasked the class with
listing<00:16:54.639><c> off</c><00:16:54.800><c> a</c><00:16:54.959><c> bunch</c><00:16:55.120><c> of</c><00:16:55.279><c> qualities</c><00:16:55.680><c> that</c><00:16:55.839><c> we</c>

00:16:56.069 --> 00:16:56.079 align:start position:0%
listing off a bunch of qualities that we
 

00:16:56.079 --> 00:16:57.829 align:start position:0%
listing off a bunch of qualities that we
know<00:16:56.320><c> real</c><00:16:56.560><c> bees</c><00:16:56.880><c> have.</c><00:16:57.360><c> Here's</c><00:16:57.600><c> three</c>

00:16:57.829 --> 00:16:57.839 align:start position:0%
know real bees have. Here's three
 

00:16:57.839 --> 00:16:59.509 align:start position:0%
know real bees have. Here's three
obvious<00:16:58.160><c> ones.</c><00:16:58.560><c> They're</c><00:16:58.800><c> bugs.</c><00:16:59.279><c> They're</c>

00:16:59.509 --> 00:16:59.519 align:start position:0%
obvious ones. They're bugs. They're
 

00:16:59.519 --> 00:17:01.269 align:start position:0%
obvious ones. They're bugs. They're
yellow.<00:16:59.759><c> And</c><00:16:59.920><c> they</c><00:17:00.079><c> make</c><00:17:00.240><c> honey.</c><00:17:00.800><c> Well,</c><00:17:01.120><c> each</c>

00:17:01.269 --> 00:17:01.279 align:start position:0%
yellow. And they make honey. Well, each
 

00:17:01.279 --> 00:17:03.509 align:start position:0%
yellow. And they make honey. Well, each
of<00:17:01.440><c> these</c><00:17:01.759><c> words</c><00:17:02.079><c> are</c><00:17:02.320><c> also</c><00:17:02.720><c> signs,</c><00:17:03.120><c> and</c><00:17:03.360><c> they</c>

00:17:03.509 --> 00:17:03.519 align:start position:0%
of these words are also signs, and they
 

00:17:03.519 --> 00:17:05.590 align:start position:0%
of these words are also signs, and they
also<00:17:03.759><c> point</c><00:17:04.000><c> at</c><00:17:04.319><c> real</c><00:17:04.640><c> world</c><00:17:04.799><c> things.</c><00:17:05.280><c> So,</c><00:17:05.439><c> we</c>

00:17:05.590 --> 00:17:05.600 align:start position:0%
also point at real world things. So, we
 

00:17:05.600 --> 00:17:07.110 align:start position:0%
also point at real world things. So, we
do<00:17:05.760><c> the</c><00:17:05.919><c> process</c><00:17:06.160><c> again.</c><00:17:06.480><c> This</c><00:17:06.640><c> time</c><00:17:06.799><c> for</c><00:17:06.959><c> the</c>

00:17:07.110 --> 00:17:07.120 align:start position:0%
do the process again. This time for the
 

00:17:07.120 --> 00:17:08.789 align:start position:0%
do the process again. This time for the
word<00:17:07.280><c> honey.</c><00:17:07.760><c> What</c><00:17:08.000><c> qualities</c><00:17:08.319><c> does</c><00:17:08.559><c> honey</c>

00:17:08.789 --> 00:17:08.799 align:start position:0%
word honey. What qualities does honey
 

00:17:08.799 --> 00:17:10.710 align:start position:0%
word honey. What qualities does honey
have?<00:17:09.199><c> It's</c><00:17:09.439><c> sticky.</c><00:17:09.839><c> It's</c><00:17:10.079><c> sweet.</c><00:17:10.400><c> It's</c><00:17:10.559><c> made</c>

00:17:10.710 --> 00:17:10.720 align:start position:0%
have? It's sticky. It's sweet. It's made
 

00:17:10.720 --> 00:17:12.549 align:start position:0%
have? It's sticky. It's sweet. It's made
in<00:17:10.880><c> a</c><00:17:11.039><c> hive.</c><00:17:11.439><c> We</c><00:17:11.600><c> can</c><00:17:11.760><c> repeat</c><00:17:12.000><c> this</c><00:17:12.160><c> process</c>

00:17:12.549 --> 00:17:12.559 align:start position:0%
in a hive. We can repeat this process
 

00:17:12.559 --> 00:17:15.750 align:start position:0%
in a hive. We can repeat this process
again<00:17:12.880><c> for</c><00:17:13.120><c> hive.</c><00:17:13.760><c> Home.</c><00:17:14.160><c> Hexagon.</c><00:17:14.959><c> Bug.</c><00:17:15.520><c> And</c>

00:17:15.750 --> 00:17:15.760 align:start position:0%
again for hive. Home. Hexagon. Bug. And
 

00:17:15.760 --> 00:17:17.350 align:start position:0%
again for hive. Home. Hexagon. Bug. And
now<00:17:16.000><c> we've</c><00:17:16.240><c> come</c><00:17:16.400><c> back</c><00:17:16.480><c> around</c><00:17:16.720><c> to</c><00:17:16.880><c> a</c><00:17:17.039><c> familiar</c>

00:17:17.350 --> 00:17:17.360 align:start position:0%
now we've come back around to a familiar
 

00:17:17.360 --> 00:17:20.309 align:start position:0%
now we've come back around to a familiar
word.<00:17:17.839><c> Both</c><00:17:18.160><c> hive</c><00:17:18.559><c> and</c><00:17:18.880><c> bee</c><00:17:19.280><c> led</c><00:17:19.520><c> us</c><00:17:19.679><c> to</c><00:17:19.839><c> bug.</c>

00:17:20.309 --> 00:17:20.319 align:start position:0%
word. Both hive and bee led us to bug.
 

00:17:20.319 --> 00:17:21.909 align:start position:0%
word. Both hive and bee led us to bug.
In<00:17:20.480><c> Dereda's</c><00:17:21.039><c> terms,</c><00:17:21.360><c> we've</c><00:17:21.520><c> hopped</c><00:17:21.839><c> around</c>

00:17:21.909 --> 00:17:21.919 align:start position:0%
In Dereda's terms, we've hopped around
 

00:17:21.919 --> 00:17:23.669 align:start position:0%
In Dereda's terms, we've hopped around
in<00:17:22.079><c> the</c><00:17:22.160><c> life</c><00:17:22.400><c> rafts</c><00:17:22.720><c> of</c><00:17:22.880><c> language,</c><00:17:23.360><c> jumping</c>

00:17:23.669 --> 00:17:23.679 align:start position:0%
in the life rafts of language, jumping
 

00:17:23.679 --> 00:17:25.270 align:start position:0%
in the life rafts of language, jumping
from<00:17:23.839><c> raft</c><00:17:24.079><c> to</c><00:17:24.240><c> raft</c><00:17:24.640><c> without</c><00:17:24.959><c> ever</c>

00:17:25.270 --> 00:17:25.280 align:start position:0%
from raft to raft without ever
 

00:17:25.280 --> 00:17:27.429 align:start position:0%
from raft to raft without ever
encountering<00:17:25.760><c> the</c><00:17:25.919><c> shoreline,</c><00:17:26.480><c> a</c><00:17:26.640><c> real</c><00:17:26.880><c> bee.</c>

00:17:27.429 --> 00:17:27.439 align:start position:0%
encountering the shoreline, a real bee.
 

00:17:27.439 --> 00:17:29.510 align:start position:0%
encountering the shoreline, a real bee.
And<00:17:27.600><c> this</c><00:17:27.839><c> has</c><00:17:28.160><c> been</c><00:17:28.319><c> a</c><00:17:28.559><c> circular</c><00:17:29.039><c> journey.</c>

00:17:29.510 --> 00:17:29.520 align:start position:0%
And this has been a circular journey.
 

00:17:29.520 --> 00:17:31.590 align:start position:0%
And this has been a circular journey.
We've<00:17:29.840><c> returned</c><00:17:30.240><c> back</c><00:17:30.400><c> to</c><00:17:30.559><c> the</c><00:17:30.720><c> word</c><00:17:30.960><c> bee.</c><00:17:31.440><c> But</c>

00:17:31.590 --> 00:17:31.600 align:start position:0%
We've returned back to the word bee. But
 

00:17:31.600 --> 00:17:33.110 align:start position:0%
We've returned back to the word bee. But
because<00:17:31.840><c> we've</c><00:17:32.160><c> gone</c><00:17:32.400><c> on</c><00:17:32.559><c> this</c><00:17:32.799><c> journey,</c>

00:17:33.110 --> 00:17:33.120 align:start position:0%
because we've gone on this journey,
 

00:17:33.120 --> 00:17:34.870 align:start position:0%
because we've gone on this journey,
we've<00:17:33.360><c> encountered</c><00:17:33.840><c> other</c><00:17:34.080><c> concepts</c><00:17:34.559><c> and</c>

00:17:34.870 --> 00:17:34.880 align:start position:0%
we've encountered other concepts and
 

00:17:34.880 --> 00:17:36.070 align:start position:0%
we've encountered other concepts and
understood<00:17:35.200><c> how</c><00:17:35.360><c> they</c><00:17:35.520><c> relate</c><00:17:35.760><c> to</c><00:17:35.919><c> each</c>

00:17:36.070 --> 00:17:36.080 align:start position:0%
understood how they relate to each
 

00:17:36.080 --> 00:17:37.669 align:start position:0%
understood how they relate to each
other,<00:17:36.400><c> we</c><00:17:36.559><c> now</c><00:17:36.799><c> have</c><00:17:36.960><c> more</c><00:17:37.280><c> knowledge</c><00:17:37.520><c> of</c>

00:17:37.669 --> 00:17:37.679 align:start position:0%
other, we now have more knowledge of
 

00:17:37.679 --> 00:17:40.150 align:start position:0%
other, we now have more knowledge of
what<00:17:37.840><c> a</c><00:17:38.000><c> bee</c><00:17:38.320><c> actually</c><00:17:38.559><c> is.</c><00:17:39.200><c> All</c><00:17:39.440><c> definitions</c>

00:17:40.150 --> 00:17:40.160 align:start position:0%
what a bee actually is. All definitions
 

00:17:40.160 --> 00:17:41.909 align:start position:0%
what a bee actually is. All definitions
are<00:17:40.320><c> necessarily</c><00:17:40.880><c> circular.</c><00:17:41.440><c> But</c><00:17:41.600><c> because</c>

00:17:41.909 --> 00:17:41.919 align:start position:0%
are necessarily circular. But because
 

00:17:41.919 --> 00:17:43.830 align:start position:0%
are necessarily circular. But because
words<00:17:42.240><c> have</c><00:17:42.480><c> qualities</c><00:17:42.960><c> and</c><00:17:43.200><c> those</c><00:17:43.440><c> qualities</c>

00:17:43.830 --> 00:17:43.840 align:start position:0%
words have qualities and those qualities
 

00:17:43.840 --> 00:17:45.909 align:start position:0%
words have qualities and those qualities
have<00:17:44.080><c> qualities,</c><00:17:44.720><c> we</c><00:17:44.880><c> can</c><00:17:45.039><c> trace</c><00:17:45.440><c> through</c><00:17:45.679><c> a</c>

00:17:45.909 --> 00:17:45.919 align:start position:0%
have qualities, we can trace through a
 

00:17:45.919 --> 00:17:47.830 align:start position:0%
have qualities, we can trace through a
web<00:17:46.240><c> of</c><00:17:46.480><c> meaning</c><00:17:46.799><c> and</c><00:17:47.120><c> understand</c><00:17:47.440><c> what</c><00:17:47.679><c> an</c>

00:17:47.830 --> 00:17:47.840 align:start position:0%
web of meaning and understand what an
 

00:17:47.840 --> 00:17:49.990 align:start position:0%
web of meaning and understand what an
initial<00:17:48.240><c> word</c><00:17:48.559><c> actually</c><00:17:48.880><c> means</c><00:17:49.360><c> based</c><00:17:49.600><c> on</c><00:17:49.760><c> its</c>

00:17:49.990 --> 00:17:50.000 align:start position:0%
initial word actually means based on its
 

00:17:50.000 --> 00:17:52.150 align:start position:0%
initial word actually means based on its
relations<00:17:50.400><c> to</c><00:17:50.559><c> other</c><00:17:50.799><c> words.</c><00:17:51.360><c> Most</c><00:17:51.600><c> writers</c>

00:17:52.150 --> 00:17:52.160 align:start position:0%
relations to other words. Most writers
 

00:17:52.160 --> 00:17:54.070 align:start position:0%
relations to other words. Most writers
who<00:17:52.240><c> debate</c><00:17:52.480><c> this</c><00:17:52.720><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:17:53.039><c> don't</c><00:17:53.360><c> actually</c><00:17:53.760><c> know</c>

00:17:54.070 --> 00:17:54.080 align:start position:0%
who debate this [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] don't actually know
 

00:17:54.080 --> 00:17:55.909 align:start position:0%
who debate this [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] don't actually know
why<00:17:54.559><c> circular</c><00:17:54.960><c> definitions</c><00:17:55.360><c> are</c><00:17:55.520><c> bad,</c><00:17:55.760><c> which</c>

00:17:55.909 --> 00:17:55.919 align:start position:0%
why circular definitions are bad, which
 

00:17:55.919 --> 00:17:57.750 align:start position:0%
why circular definitions are bad, which
is<00:17:56.080><c> probably</c><00:17:56.240><c> why</c><00:17:56.400><c> Nara</c><00:17:56.880><c> mocked</c><00:17:57.200><c> the</c><00:17:57.280><c> idea.</c>

00:17:57.750 --> 00:17:57.760 align:start position:0%
is probably why Nara mocked the idea.
 

00:17:57.760 --> 00:17:59.510 align:start position:0%
is probably why Nara mocked the idea.
She's<00:17:58.080><c> likely</c><00:17:58.400><c> encountered</c><00:17:58.799><c> those</c><00:17:58.960><c> writing</c>

00:17:59.510 --> 00:17:59.520 align:start position:0%
She's likely encountered those writing
 

00:17:59.520 --> 00:18:01.590 align:start position:0%
She's likely encountered those writing
the<00:17:59.679><c> past.</c><00:18:00.080><c> But</c><00:18:00.240><c> the</c><00:18:00.400><c> actual</c><00:18:00.799><c> problem</c><00:18:01.120><c> here</c><00:18:01.360><c> is</c>

00:18:01.590 --> 00:18:01.600 align:start position:0%
the past. But the actual problem here is
 

00:18:01.600 --> 00:18:03.350 align:start position:0%
the past. But the actual problem here is
that<00:18:01.840><c> definitions</c><00:18:02.320><c> that</c><00:18:02.480><c> are</c><00:18:02.640><c> circular</c><00:18:03.120><c> in</c>

00:18:03.350 --> 00:18:03.360 align:start position:0%
that definitions that are circular in
 

00:18:03.360 --> 00:18:05.669 align:start position:0%
that definitions that are circular in
one<00:18:03.600><c> step,</c><00:18:04.080><c> well,</c><00:18:04.240><c> it</c><00:18:04.480><c> turns</c><00:18:04.720><c> out</c><00:18:05.039><c> there's</c><00:18:05.440><c> no</c>

00:18:05.669 --> 00:18:05.679 align:start position:0%
one step, well, it turns out there's no
 

00:18:05.679 --> 00:18:07.909 align:start position:0%
one step, well, it turns out there's no
web<00:18:05.919><c> of</c><00:18:06.080><c> meaning</c><00:18:06.320><c> to</c><00:18:06.480><c> trace</c><00:18:06.799><c> down.</c><00:18:07.280><c> There's</c><00:18:07.600><c> no</c>

00:18:07.909 --> 00:18:07.919 align:start position:0%
web of meaning to trace down. There's no
 

00:18:07.919 --> 00:18:09.830 align:start position:0%
web of meaning to trace down. There's no
understanding<00:18:08.400><c> to</c><00:18:08.559><c> be</c><00:18:08.720><c> gained</c><00:18:09.039><c> by</c><00:18:09.360><c> examining</c>

00:18:09.830 --> 00:18:09.840 align:start position:0%
understanding to be gained by examining
 

00:18:09.840 --> 00:18:12.150 align:start position:0%
understanding to be gained by examining
how<00:18:10.080><c> the</c><00:18:10.320><c> word</c><00:18:10.559><c> exists</c><00:18:11.039><c> in</c><00:18:11.360><c> relation</c><00:18:11.679><c> to</c><00:18:11.919><c> other</c>

00:18:12.150 --> 00:18:12.160 align:start position:0%
how the word exists in relation to other
 

00:18:12.160 --> 00:18:14.310 align:start position:0%
how the word exists in relation to other
words.<00:18:12.799><c> If</c><00:18:13.039><c> you</c><00:18:13.200><c> were</c><00:18:13.360><c> to</c><00:18:13.520><c> actually</c><00:18:13.919><c> draw</c><00:18:14.160><c> a</c>

00:18:14.310 --> 00:18:14.320 align:start position:0%
words. If you were to actually draw a
 

00:18:14.320 --> 00:18:16.230 align:start position:0%
words. If you were to actually draw a
deridarust<00:18:14.960><c> style</c><00:18:15.200><c> web</c><00:18:15.520><c> of</c><00:18:15.679><c> meaning</c><00:18:15.919><c> for</c><00:18:16.080><c> the</c>

00:18:16.230 --> 00:18:16.240 align:start position:0%
deridarust style web of meaning for the
 

00:18:16.240 --> 00:18:18.390 align:start position:0%
deridarust style web of meaning for the
word<00:18:16.480><c> woman,</c><00:18:16.960><c> what</c><00:18:17.280><c> related</c><00:18:17.679><c> qualities</c><00:18:18.160><c> might</c>

00:18:18.390 --> 00:18:18.400 align:start position:0%
word woman, what related qualities might
 

00:18:18.400 --> 00:18:19.909 align:start position:0%
word woman, what related qualities might
you<00:18:18.559><c> put</c><00:18:18.640><c> in</c><00:18:18.799><c> there</c><00:18:19.039><c> to</c><00:18:19.280><c> begin</c><00:18:19.520><c> your</c><00:18:19.679><c> journey</c>

00:18:19.909 --> 00:18:19.919 align:start position:0%
you put in there to begin your journey
 

00:18:19.919 --> 00:18:22.230 align:start position:0%
you put in there to begin your journey
of<00:18:20.080><c> raft</c><00:18:20.400><c> hopping?</c><00:18:20.960><c> Maybe</c><00:18:21.280><c> things</c><00:18:21.600><c> like</c><00:18:22.000><c> large</c>

00:18:22.230 --> 00:18:22.240 align:start position:0%
of raft hopping? Maybe things like large
 

00:18:22.240 --> 00:18:24.950 align:start position:0%
of raft hopping? Maybe things like large
gametes,<00:18:22.960><c> XX</c><00:18:23.360><c> chromosomes,</c><00:18:24.160><c> larger</c><00:18:24.559><c> breasts,</c>

00:18:24.950 --> 00:18:24.960 align:start position:0%
gametes, XX chromosomes, larger breasts,
 

00:18:24.960 --> 00:18:26.789 align:start position:0%
gametes, XX chromosomes, larger breasts,
wider<00:18:25.280><c> hips.</c><00:18:25.919><c> But</c><00:18:26.080><c> these</c><00:18:26.320><c> are</c><00:18:26.480><c> things</c><00:18:26.640><c> that</c>

00:18:26.789 --> 00:18:26.799 align:start position:0%
wider hips. But these are things that
 

00:18:26.799 --> 00:18:29.350 align:start position:0%
wider hips. But these are things that
Nara<00:18:27.280><c> has</c><00:18:27.440><c> already</c><00:18:27.760><c> explicitly</c><00:18:28.480><c> rejected</c><00:18:29.039><c> as</c>

00:18:29.350 --> 00:18:29.360 align:start position:0%
Nara has already explicitly rejected as
 

00:18:29.360 --> 00:18:31.350 align:start position:0%
Nara has already explicitly rejected as
necessary<00:18:29.840><c> parts</c><00:18:30.160><c> of</c><00:18:30.400><c> being</c><00:18:30.559><c> a</c><00:18:30.799><c> woman.</c><00:18:31.120><c> From</c>

00:18:31.350 --> 00:18:31.360 align:start position:0%
necessary parts of being a woman. From
 

00:18:31.360 --> 00:18:33.190 align:start position:0%
necessary parts of being a woman. From
Niara's<00:18:31.919><c> point</c><00:18:32.080><c> of</c><00:18:32.160><c> view,</c><00:18:32.400><c> the</c><00:18:32.640><c> word</c><00:18:32.799><c> woman</c>

00:18:33.190 --> 00:18:33.200 align:start position:0%
Niara's point of view, the word woman
 

00:18:33.200 --> 00:18:35.110 align:start position:0%
Niara's point of view, the word woman
cannot<00:18:33.679><c> actually</c><00:18:34.000><c> point</c><00:18:34.320><c> to</c><00:18:34.480><c> these</c><00:18:34.720><c> things</c>

00:18:35.110 --> 00:18:35.120 align:start position:0%
cannot actually point to these things
 

00:18:35.120 --> 00:18:36.789 align:start position:0%
cannot actually point to these things
for<00:18:35.280><c> the</c><00:18:35.520><c> same</c><00:18:35.679><c> reason</c><00:18:35.840><c> that</c><00:18:36.080><c> the</c><00:18:36.240><c> word</c><00:18:36.480><c> be</c>

00:18:36.789 --> 00:18:36.799 align:start position:0%
for the same reason that the word be
 

00:18:36.799 --> 00:18:39.669 align:start position:0%
for the same reason that the word be
cannot<00:18:37.200><c> point</c><00:18:37.440><c> to</c><00:18:37.679><c> say</c><00:18:38.160><c> mammal.</c><00:18:38.960><c> So</c><00:18:39.360><c> what's</c>

00:18:39.669 --> 00:18:39.679 align:start position:0%
cannot point to say mammal. So what's
 

00:18:39.679 --> 00:18:41.830 align:start position:0%
cannot point to say mammal. So what's
left?<00:18:40.240><c> How</c><00:18:40.400><c> would</c><00:18:40.640><c> Nara</c><00:18:41.200><c> draw</c><00:18:41.360><c> a</c><00:18:41.520><c> web</c><00:18:41.679><c> of</c>

00:18:41.830 --> 00:18:41.840 align:start position:0%
left? How would Nara draw a web of
 

00:18:41.840 --> 00:18:43.510 align:start position:0%
left? How would Nara draw a web of
meaning<00:18:42.080><c> for</c><00:18:42.240><c> the</c><00:18:42.400><c> word</c><00:18:42.559><c> woman?</c><00:18:43.039><c> Well,</c><00:18:43.280><c> when</c>

00:18:43.510 --> 00:18:43.520 align:start position:0%
meaning for the word woman? Well, when
 

00:18:43.520 --> 00:18:45.750 align:start position:0%
meaning for the word woman? Well, when
she<00:18:43.760><c> said</c><00:18:44.240><c> the</c><00:18:44.480><c> only</c><00:18:44.720><c> thing</c><00:18:44.880><c> that</c><00:18:45.200><c> all</c><00:18:45.440><c> women</c>

00:18:45.750 --> 00:18:45.760 align:start position:0%
she said the only thing that all women
 

00:18:45.760 --> 00:18:47.430 align:start position:0%
she said the only thing that all women
have<00:18:45.919><c> in</c><00:18:46.160><c> common</c><00:18:46.400><c> is</c><00:18:46.640><c> that</c><00:18:46.799><c> we</c><00:18:46.960><c> are</c><00:18:47.120><c> adult</c>

00:18:47.430 --> 00:18:47.440 align:start position:0%
have in common is that we are adult
 

00:18:47.440 --> 00:18:49.430 align:start position:0%
have in common is that we are adult
human<00:18:47.760><c> beings</c><00:18:48.000><c> who</c><00:18:48.320><c> identify</c><00:18:48.559><c> as</c><00:18:48.799><c> such.</c><00:18:49.280><c> What</c>

00:18:49.430 --> 00:18:49.440 align:start position:0%
human beings who identify as such. What
 

00:18:49.440 --> 00:18:51.590 align:start position:0%
human beings who identify as such. What
she's<00:18:49.760><c> saying</c><00:18:50.000><c> is</c><00:18:50.400><c> the</c><00:18:50.640><c> word</c><00:18:50.880><c> woman</c><00:18:51.280><c> only</c>

00:18:51.590 --> 00:18:51.600 align:start position:0%
she's saying is the word woman only
 

00:18:51.600 --> 00:18:53.270 align:start position:0%
she's saying is the word woman only
points<00:18:51.919><c> back</c><00:18:52.160><c> to</c><00:18:52.320><c> itself.</c><00:18:52.960><c> It</c><00:18:53.120><c> is</c>

00:18:53.270 --> 00:18:53.280 align:start position:0%
points back to itself. It is
 

00:18:53.280 --> 00:18:55.350 align:start position:0%
points back to itself. It is
self-referential.<00:18:54.400><c> It</c><00:18:54.559><c> contains</c><00:18:55.039><c> no</c>

00:18:55.350 --> 00:18:55.360 align:start position:0%
self-referential. It contains no
 

00:18:55.360 --> 00:18:57.430 align:start position:0%
self-referential. It contains no
relations<00:18:55.760><c> to</c><00:18:56.000><c> any</c><00:18:56.240><c> other</c><00:18:56.480><c> concepts.</c><00:18:57.200><c> In</c>

00:18:57.430 --> 00:18:57.440 align:start position:0%
relations to any other concepts. In
 

00:18:57.440 --> 00:18:59.430 align:start position:0%
relations to any other concepts. In
fact,<00:18:57.760><c> the</c><00:18:58.000><c> very</c><00:18:58.320><c> idea</c><00:18:58.559><c> that</c><00:18:58.720><c> the</c><00:18:58.880><c> word</c><00:18:59.120><c> woman</c>

00:18:59.430 --> 00:18:59.440 align:start position:0%
fact, the very idea that the word woman
 

00:18:59.440 --> 00:19:01.350 align:start position:0%
fact, the very idea that the word woman
might<00:18:59.600><c> contain</c><00:19:00.000><c> any</c><00:19:00.320><c> qualities</c><00:19:00.720><c> at</c><00:19:00.960><c> all</c><00:19:01.120><c> is</c>

00:19:01.350 --> 00:19:01.360 align:start position:0%
might contain any qualities at all is
 

00:19:01.360 --> 00:19:03.270 align:start position:0%
might contain any qualities at all is
inherently<00:19:01.919><c> transphobic</c><00:19:02.559><c> to</c><00:19:02.720><c> her</c><00:19:03.039><c> because</c>

00:19:03.270 --> 00:19:03.280 align:start position:0%
inherently transphobic to her because
 

00:19:03.280 --> 00:19:05.510 align:start position:0%
inherently transphobic to her because
that<00:19:03.600><c> means</c><00:19:04.160><c> somebody</c><00:19:04.480><c> might</c><00:19:04.880><c> identify</c><00:19:05.200><c> as</c><00:19:05.360><c> a</c>

00:19:05.510 --> 00:19:05.520 align:start position:0%
that means somebody might identify as a
 

00:19:05.520 --> 00:19:07.750 align:start position:0%
that means somebody might identify as a
woman<00:19:05.760><c> and</c><00:19:06.080><c> yet</c><00:19:06.320><c> still</c><00:19:06.640><c> lack</c><00:19:06.880><c> that</c><00:19:07.200><c> quality.</c>

00:19:07.750 --> 00:19:07.760 align:start position:0%
woman and yet still lack that quality.
 

00:19:07.760 --> 00:19:09.830 align:start position:0%
woman and yet still lack that quality.
Which<00:19:07.919><c> means</c><00:19:08.160><c> the</c><00:19:08.400><c> existence</c><00:19:08.880><c> of</c><00:19:09.120><c> the</c><00:19:09.360><c> quality</c>

00:19:09.830 --> 00:19:09.840 align:start position:0%
Which means the existence of the quality
 

00:19:09.840 --> 00:19:11.909 align:start position:0%
Which means the existence of the quality
in<00:19:10.080><c> its</c><00:19:10.400><c> position</c><00:19:10.799><c> as</c><00:19:11.039><c> a</c><00:19:11.280><c> relation</c><00:19:11.600><c> to</c><00:19:11.760><c> the</c>

00:19:11.909 --> 00:19:11.919 align:start position:0%
in its position as a relation to the
 

00:19:11.919 --> 00:19:13.990 align:start position:0%
in its position as a relation to the
word<00:19:12.160><c> woman</c><00:19:12.559><c> is</c><00:19:12.880><c> actually</c><00:19:13.360><c> gatekeeping</c>

00:19:13.990 --> 00:19:14.000 align:start position:0%
word woman is actually gatekeeping
 

00:19:14.000 --> 00:19:15.830 align:start position:0%
word woman is actually gatekeeping
womanhood<00:19:14.480><c> from</c><00:19:14.720><c> that</c><00:19:14.880><c> individual.</c><00:19:15.520><c> In</c><00:19:15.760><c> other</c>

00:19:15.830 --> 00:19:15.840 align:start position:0%
womanhood from that individual. In other
 

00:19:15.840 --> 00:19:17.909 align:start position:0%
womanhood from that individual. In other
words,<00:19:16.240><c> if</c><00:19:16.400><c> there's</c><00:19:16.640><c> any</c><00:19:16.880><c> sort</c><00:19:17.120><c> of</c><00:19:17.360><c> external</c>

00:19:17.909 --> 00:19:17.919 align:start position:0%
words, if there's any sort of external
 

00:19:17.919 --> 00:19:19.590 align:start position:0%
words, if there's any sort of external
standards<00:19:18.480><c> attached</c><00:19:18.799><c> to</c><00:19:18.960><c> the</c><00:19:19.120><c> word</c><00:19:19.280><c> woman</c>

00:19:19.590 --> 00:19:19.600 align:start position:0%
standards attached to the word woman
 

00:19:19.600 --> 00:19:21.430 align:start position:0%
standards attached to the word woman
that<00:19:19.840><c> outside</c><00:19:20.240><c> people</c><00:19:20.559><c> can</c><00:19:20.720><c> observe</c><00:19:21.200><c> and</c>

00:19:21.430 --> 00:19:21.440 align:start position:0%
that outside people can observe and
 

00:19:21.440 --> 00:19:23.270 align:start position:0%
that outside people can observe and
judge<00:19:21.760><c> those</c><00:19:22.000><c> who</c><00:19:22.160><c> claim</c><00:19:22.320><c> to</c><00:19:22.480><c> be</c><00:19:22.640><c> women</c><00:19:22.799><c> by,</c>

00:19:23.270 --> 00:19:23.280 align:start position:0%
judge those who claim to be women by,
 

00:19:23.280 --> 00:19:24.950 align:start position:0%
judge those who claim to be women by,
then<00:19:23.440><c> it's</c><00:19:23.679><c> automatically</c><00:19:24.240><c> transphobic</c>

00:19:24.950 --> 00:19:24.960 align:start position:0%
then it's automatically transphobic
 

00:19:24.960 --> 00:19:26.549 align:start position:0%
then it's automatically transphobic
because<00:19:25.200><c> of</c><00:19:25.360><c> the</c><00:19:25.600><c> possibility</c><00:19:26.000><c> that</c><00:19:26.240><c> someone</c>

00:19:26.549 --> 00:19:26.559 align:start position:0%
because of the possibility that someone
 

00:19:26.559 --> 00:19:28.630 align:start position:0%
because of the possibility that someone
might<00:19:26.880><c> not</c><00:19:27.120><c> actually</c><00:19:27.440><c> pass</c><00:19:27.760><c> that</c><00:19:28.000><c> judgment.</c>

00:19:28.630 --> 00:19:28.640 align:start position:0%
might not actually pass that judgment.
 

00:19:28.640 --> 00:19:30.710 align:start position:0%
might not actually pass that judgment.
Therefore,<00:19:29.039><c> for</c><00:19:29.280><c> Niara,</c><00:19:29.840><c> the</c><00:19:30.000><c> word</c><00:19:30.240><c> woman</c>

00:19:30.710 --> 00:19:30.720 align:start position:0%
Therefore, for Niara, the word woman
 

00:19:30.720 --> 00:19:33.510 align:start position:0%
Therefore, for Niara, the word woman
must<00:19:31.039><c> be</c><00:19:31.280><c> self-referential</c><00:19:32.240><c> and</c><00:19:32.559><c> contain</c><00:19:33.200><c> no</c>

00:19:33.510 --> 00:19:33.520 align:start position:0%
must be self-referential and contain no
 

00:19:33.520 --> 00:19:35.350 align:start position:0%
must be self-referential and contain no
other<00:19:33.840><c> meaningful</c><00:19:34.320><c> content.</c><00:19:34.880><c> You</c><00:19:35.039><c> are</c><00:19:35.200><c> a</c>

00:19:35.350 --> 00:19:35.360 align:start position:0%
other meaningful content. You are a
 

00:19:35.360 --> 00:19:37.029 align:start position:0%
other meaningful content. You are a
woman<00:19:35.520><c> if</c><00:19:35.760><c> you</c><00:19:35.919><c> say</c><00:19:36.080><c> you</c><00:19:36.240><c> are,</c><00:19:36.400><c> and</c><00:19:36.640><c> that</c><00:19:36.880><c> is</c>

00:19:37.029 --> 00:19:37.039 align:start position:0%
woman if you say you are, and that is
 

00:19:37.039 --> 00:19:39.669 align:start position:0%
woman if you say you are, and that is
all<00:19:37.280><c> the</c><00:19:37.520><c> word</c><00:19:37.760><c> means.</c><00:19:38.480><c> So,</c><00:19:38.799><c> if</c><00:19:39.039><c> we</c><00:19:39.280><c> actually</c>

00:19:39.669 --> 00:19:39.679 align:start position:0%
all the word means. So, if we actually
 

00:19:39.679 --> 00:19:41.590 align:start position:0%
all the word means. So, if we actually
did<00:19:40.000><c> draw</c><00:19:40.240><c> a</c><00:19:40.400><c> web</c><00:19:40.640><c> of</c><00:19:40.799><c> meaning</c><00:19:41.039><c> for</c><00:19:41.280><c> this</c><00:19:41.440><c> view</c>

00:19:41.590 --> 00:19:41.600 align:start position:0%
did draw a web of meaning for this view
 

00:19:41.600 --> 00:19:43.270 align:start position:0%
did draw a web of meaning for this view
of<00:19:41.760><c> the</c><00:19:41.840><c> word</c><00:19:42.080><c> woman,</c><00:19:42.400><c> it</c><00:19:42.559><c> would</c><00:19:42.720><c> be</c><00:19:42.880><c> circular</c>

00:19:43.270 --> 00:19:43.280 align:start position:0%
of the word woman, it would be circular
 

00:19:43.280 --> 00:19:44.950 align:start position:0%
of the word woman, it would be circular
in<00:19:43.520><c> one</c><00:19:43.760><c> step.</c><00:19:44.160><c> Now,</c><00:19:44.400><c> maybe</c><00:19:44.559><c> you</c><00:19:44.720><c> think</c><00:19:44.799><c> this</c>

00:19:44.950 --> 00:19:44.960 align:start position:0%
in one step. Now, maybe you think this
 

00:19:44.960 --> 00:19:46.630 align:start position:0%
in one step. Now, maybe you think this
isn't<00:19:45.200><c> a</c><00:19:45.280><c> problem.</c><00:19:45.520><c> Like,</c><00:19:45.760><c> who</c><00:19:45.919><c> cares?</c><00:19:46.480><c> Well,</c>

00:19:46.630 --> 00:19:46.640 align:start position:0%
isn't a problem. Like, who cares? Well,
 

00:19:46.640 --> 00:19:48.470 align:start position:0%
isn't a problem. Like, who cares? Well,
what<00:19:46.880><c> this</c><00:19:47.039><c> diagram</c><00:19:47.360><c> is</c><00:19:47.600><c> telling</c><00:19:47.760><c> us</c><00:19:48.080><c> is</c><00:19:48.240><c> that</c>

00:19:48.470 --> 00:19:48.480 align:start position:0%
what this diagram is telling us is that
 

00:19:48.480 --> 00:19:50.470 align:start position:0%
what this diagram is telling us is that
it<00:19:48.640><c> is</c><00:19:48.880><c> impossible</c><00:19:49.360><c> for</c><00:19:49.600><c> anybody</c><00:19:50.000><c> to</c><00:19:50.160><c> actually</c>

00:19:50.470 --> 00:19:50.480 align:start position:0%
it is impossible for anybody to actually
 

00:19:50.480 --> 00:19:52.630 align:start position:0%
it is impossible for anybody to actually
know<00:19:50.720><c> what</c><00:19:50.960><c> the</c><00:19:51.200><c> word</c><00:19:51.440><c> woman</c><00:19:51.840><c> means,</c><00:19:52.320><c> at</c><00:19:52.400><c> least</c>

00:19:52.630 --> 00:19:52.640 align:start position:0%
know what the word woman means, at least
 

00:19:52.640 --> 00:19:55.190 align:start position:0%
know what the word woman means, at least
in<00:19:52.799><c> the</c><00:19:53.039><c> deridian</c><00:19:53.840><c> sense.</c><00:19:54.400><c> It</c><00:19:54.559><c> has</c><00:19:54.720><c> become</c><00:19:54.960><c> a</c>

00:19:55.190 --> 00:19:55.200 align:start position:0%
in the deridian sense. It has become a
 

00:19:55.200 --> 00:19:57.350 align:start position:0%
in the deridian sense. It has become a
useless,<00:19:55.760><c> empty</c><00:19:56.080><c> word,</c><00:19:56.480><c> devoid</c><00:19:56.880><c> of</c><00:19:57.039><c> meaning.</c>

00:19:57.350 --> 00:19:57.360 align:start position:0%
useless, empty word, devoid of meaning.
 

00:19:57.360 --> 00:19:58.710 align:start position:0%
useless, empty word, devoid of meaning.
And<00:19:57.520><c> if</c><00:19:57.600><c> we</c><00:19:57.760><c> were</c><00:19:57.840><c> to</c><00:19:57.919><c> sub</c><00:19:58.080><c> in</c><00:19:58.240><c> a</c><00:19:58.400><c> truly</c>

00:19:58.710 --> 00:19:58.720 align:start position:0%
And if we were to sub in a truly
 

00:19:58.720 --> 00:20:00.310 align:start position:0%
And if we were to sub in a truly
meaningless<00:19:59.120><c> word</c><00:19:59.280><c> into</c><00:19:59.520><c> the</c><00:19:59.679><c> diagram,</c><00:20:00.080><c> the</c>

00:20:00.310 --> 00:20:00.320 align:start position:0%
meaningless word into the diagram, the
 

00:20:00.320 --> 00:20:02.150 align:start position:0%
meaningless word into the diagram, the
problem<00:20:00.559><c> becomes</c><00:20:00.880><c> obvious.</c><00:20:01.520><c> What</c><00:20:01.760><c> is</c><00:20:01.919><c> a</c>

00:20:02.150 --> 00:20:02.160 align:start position:0%
problem becomes obvious. What is a
 

00:20:02.160 --> 00:20:04.150 align:start position:0%
problem becomes obvious. What is a
glorous?<00:20:02.880><c> Can</c><00:20:03.039><c> we</c><00:20:03.200><c> actually</c><00:20:03.440><c> truly</c><00:20:03.760><c> know</c><00:20:04.000><c> if</c>

00:20:04.150 --> 00:20:04.160 align:start position:0%
glorous? Can we actually truly know if
 

00:20:04.160 --> 00:20:06.150 align:start position:0%
glorous? Can we actually truly know if
the<00:20:04.320><c> word</c><00:20:04.559><c> glorbus</c><00:20:05.120><c> contains</c><00:20:05.520><c> no</c><00:20:05.760><c> relations</c>

00:20:06.150 --> 00:20:06.160 align:start position:0%
the word glorbus contains no relations
 

00:20:06.160 --> 00:20:08.150 align:start position:0%
the word glorbus contains no relations
to<00:20:06.400><c> any</c><00:20:06.559><c> other</c><00:20:06.799><c> ideas?</c><00:20:07.440><c> If</c><00:20:07.600><c> it</c><00:20:07.679><c> can</c><00:20:07.840><c> be</c><00:20:07.919><c> any</c>

00:20:08.150 --> 00:20:08.160 align:start position:0%
to any other ideas? If it can be any
 

00:20:08.160 --> 00:20:09.669 align:start position:0%
to any other ideas? If it can be any
shape<00:20:08.320><c> or</c><00:20:08.559><c> size</c><00:20:08.720><c> or</c><00:20:08.960><c> color?</c><00:20:09.280><c> If</c><00:20:09.360><c> it</c><00:20:09.440><c> can</c><00:20:09.520><c> be</c>

00:20:09.669 --> 00:20:09.679 align:start position:0%
shape or size or color? If it can be
 

00:20:09.679 --> 00:20:11.110 align:start position:0%
shape or size or color? If it can be
alive<00:20:09.840><c> or</c><00:20:10.080><c> dead?</c><00:20:10.320><c> If</c><00:20:10.480><c> it</c><00:20:10.640><c> can</c><00:20:10.720><c> serve</c><00:20:10.960><c> any</c>

00:20:11.110 --> 00:20:11.120 align:start position:0%
alive or dead? If it can serve any
 

00:20:11.120 --> 00:20:12.630 align:start position:0%
alive or dead? If it can serve any
function<00:20:11.360><c> or</c><00:20:11.520><c> no</c><00:20:11.760><c> function?</c><00:20:12.160><c> If</c><00:20:12.320><c> its</c><00:20:12.480><c> only</c>

00:20:12.630 --> 00:20:12.640 align:start position:0%
function or no function? If its only
 

00:20:12.640 --> 00:20:14.230 align:start position:0%
function or no function? If its only
quality<00:20:12.960><c> is</c><00:20:13.039><c> that</c><00:20:13.200><c> it's</c><00:20:13.280><c> a</c><00:20:13.440><c> glorous,</c><00:20:14.000><c> how</c>

00:20:14.230 --> 00:20:14.240 align:start position:0%
quality is that it's a glorous, how
 

00:20:14.240 --> 00:20:16.070 align:start position:0%
quality is that it's a glorous, how
would<00:20:14.400><c> we</c><00:20:14.480><c> know</c><00:20:14.720><c> one</c><00:20:14.880><c> if</c><00:20:15.039><c> we</c><00:20:15.200><c> saw</c><00:20:15.360><c> one?</c><00:20:15.840><c> Now,</c>

00:20:16.070 --> 00:20:16.080 align:start position:0%
would we know one if we saw one? Now,
 

00:20:16.080 --> 00:20:17.990 align:start position:0%
would we know one if we saw one? Now,
there<00:20:16.320><c> actually</c><00:20:16.640><c> is</c><00:20:16.880><c> a</c><00:20:17.200><c> pretty</c><00:20:17.360><c> good</c><00:20:17.520><c> rebuttal</c>

00:20:17.990 --> 00:20:18.000 align:start position:0%
there actually is a pretty good rebuttal
 

00:20:18.000 --> 00:20:19.830 align:start position:0%
there actually is a pretty good rebuttal
to<00:20:18.160><c> the</c><00:20:18.240><c> derided</c><00:20:18.720><c> way</c><00:20:18.799><c> of</c><00:20:18.960><c> viewing</c><00:20:19.200><c> language.</c>

00:20:19.830 --> 00:20:19.840 align:start position:0%
to the derided way of viewing language.
 

00:20:19.840 --> 00:20:21.590 align:start position:0%
to the derided way of viewing language.
I<00:20:20.080><c> even</c><00:20:20.240><c> gave</c><00:20:20.400><c> it</c><00:20:20.559><c> to</c><00:20:20.640><c> Nara</c><00:20:21.120><c> at</c><00:20:21.280><c> one</c><00:20:21.360><c> point,</c>

00:20:21.590 --> 00:20:21.600 align:start position:0%
I even gave it to Nara at one point,
 

00:20:21.600 --> 00:20:22.710 align:start position:0%
I even gave it to Nara at one point,
though<00:20:21.840><c> she</c><00:20:21.919><c> wasn't</c><00:20:22.160><c> smart</c><00:20:22.320><c> enough</c><00:20:22.480><c> to</c><00:20:22.640><c> get</c>

00:20:22.710 --> 00:20:22.720 align:start position:0%
though she wasn't smart enough to get
 

00:20:22.720 --> 00:20:24.390 align:start position:0%
though she wasn't smart enough to get
it.<00:20:22.960><c> But</c><00:20:23.120><c> hey,</c><00:20:23.440><c> you</c><00:20:23.520><c> know</c><00:20:23.679><c> that</c><00:20:23.919><c> old</c><00:20:24.160><c> saying</c>

00:20:24.390 --> 00:20:24.400 align:start position:0%
it. But hey, you know that old saying
 

00:20:24.400 --> 00:20:25.990 align:start position:0%
it. But hey, you know that old saying
about<00:20:24.640><c> leading</c><00:20:24.960><c> horses</c><00:20:25.200><c> to</c><00:20:25.440><c> water.</c><00:20:25.760><c> And</c>

00:20:25.990 --> 00:20:26.000 align:start position:0%
about leading horses to water. And
 

00:20:26.000 --> 00:20:27.350 align:start position:0%
about leading horses to water. And
speaking<00:20:26.240><c> of</c><00:20:26.400><c> horses,</c><00:20:26.799><c> that's</c><00:20:27.039><c> actually</c><00:20:27.200><c> the</c>

00:20:27.350 --> 00:20:27.360 align:start position:0%
speaking of horses, that's actually the
 

00:20:27.360 --> 00:20:29.029 align:start position:0%
speaking of horses, that's actually the
rebuttal.<00:20:27.840><c> There's</c><00:20:28.080><c> an</c><00:20:28.159><c> old</c><00:20:28.400><c> story,</c><00:20:28.720><c> well,</c>

00:20:29.029 --> 00:20:29.039 align:start position:0%
rebuttal. There's an old story, well,
 

00:20:29.039 --> 00:20:30.470 align:start position:0%
rebuttal. There's an old story, well,
old<00:20:29.200><c> by</c><00:20:29.440><c> internet</c><00:20:29.679><c> standards,</c><00:20:30.080><c> of</c><00:20:30.240><c> an</c>

00:20:30.470 --> 00:20:30.480 align:start position:0%
old by internet standards, of an
 

00:20:30.480 --> 00:20:31.909 align:start position:0%
old by internet standards, of an
argument<00:20:30.720><c> between</c><00:20:30.960><c> a</c><00:20:31.120><c> turf</c><00:20:31.360><c> and</c><00:20:31.520><c> a</c><00:20:31.600><c> transact</c>

00:20:31.909 --> 00:20:31.919 align:start position:0%
argument between a turf and a transact
 

00:20:31.919 --> 00:20:33.990 align:start position:0%
argument between a turf and a transact
activist.<00:20:32.559><c> The</c><00:20:32.720><c> turf</c><00:20:33.120><c> said</c><00:20:33.280><c> that</c><00:20:33.440><c> a</c><00:20:33.600><c> chair</c><00:20:33.840><c> is</c>

00:20:33.990 --> 00:20:34.000 align:start position:0%
activist. The turf said that a chair is
 

00:20:34.000 --> 00:20:35.909 align:start position:0%
activist. The turf said that a chair is
defined<00:20:34.320><c> as</c><00:20:34.480><c> having</c><00:20:34.720><c> four</c><00:20:35.039><c> legs,</c><00:20:35.440><c> a</c><00:20:35.600><c> back,</c><00:20:35.760><c> and</c>

00:20:35.909 --> 00:20:35.919 align:start position:0%
defined as having four legs, a back, and
 

00:20:35.919 --> 00:20:37.430 align:start position:0%
defined as having four legs, a back, and
a<00:20:36.080><c> place</c><00:20:36.240><c> to</c><00:20:36.400><c> sit</c><00:20:36.559><c> upon.</c><00:20:36.960><c> We</c><00:20:37.120><c> can</c><00:20:37.200><c> see</c><00:20:37.280><c> this</c>

00:20:37.430 --> 00:20:37.440 align:start position:0%
a place to sit upon. We can see this
 

00:20:37.440 --> 00:20:38.950 align:start position:0%
a place to sit upon. We can see this
aderes<00:20:37.840><c> to</c><00:20:37.919><c> Dareda's</c><00:20:38.400><c> web</c><00:20:38.559><c> of</c><00:20:38.720><c> meaning</c>

00:20:38.950 --> 00:20:38.960 align:start position:0%
aderes to Dareda's web of meaning
 

00:20:38.960 --> 00:20:41.270 align:start position:0%
aderes to Dareda's web of meaning
nicely.<00:20:39.360><c> The</c><00:20:39.600><c> signifier</c><00:20:40.159><c> is</c><00:20:40.480><c> chair.</c><00:20:40.960><c> Its</c>

00:20:41.270 --> 00:20:41.280 align:start position:0%
nicely. The signifier is chair. Its
 

00:20:41.280 --> 00:20:43.430 align:start position:0%
nicely. The signifier is chair. Its
qualities<00:20:41.679><c> are</c><00:20:42.000><c> four</c><00:20:42.240><c> legs,</c><00:20:42.720><c> back,</c><00:20:42.960><c> and</c><00:20:43.200><c> place</c>

00:20:43.430 --> 00:20:43.440 align:start position:0%
qualities are four legs, back, and place
 

00:20:43.440 --> 00:20:45.669 align:start position:0%
qualities are four legs, back, and place
to<00:20:43.600><c> sit.</c><00:20:44.080><c> But</c><00:20:44.240><c> then</c><00:20:44.480><c> the</c><00:20:44.720><c> transactivist</c><00:20:45.440><c> shows</c>

00:20:45.669 --> 00:20:45.679 align:start position:0%
to sit. But then the transactivist shows
 

00:20:45.679 --> 00:20:47.750 align:start position:0%
to sit. But then the transactivist shows
them<00:20:45.840><c> a</c><00:20:46.000><c> horse.</c><00:20:46.480><c> By</c><00:20:46.799><c> this</c><00:20:47.039><c> definition,</c><00:20:47.520><c> a</c>

00:20:47.750 --> 00:20:47.760 align:start position:0%
them a horse. By this definition, a
 

00:20:47.760 --> 00:20:49.990 align:start position:0%
them a horse. By this definition, a
horse<00:20:48.000><c> is</c><00:20:48.240><c> a</c><00:20:48.400><c> chair.</c><00:20:48.799><c> It</c><00:20:49.039><c> has</c><00:20:49.200><c> four</c><00:20:49.520><c> legs.</c><00:20:49.840><c> It</c>

00:20:49.990 --> 00:20:50.000 align:start position:0%
horse is a chair. It has four legs. It
 

00:20:50.000 --> 00:20:52.070 align:start position:0%
horse is a chair. It has four legs. It
has<00:20:50.080><c> a</c><00:20:50.240><c> back.</c><00:20:50.559><c> It</c><00:20:50.720><c> has</c><00:20:50.799><c> a</c><00:20:50.960><c> place</c><00:20:51.120><c> to</c><00:20:51.280><c> sit.</c><00:20:51.760><c> Now,</c>

00:20:52.070 --> 00:20:52.080 align:start position:0%
has a back. It has a place to sit. Now,
 

00:20:52.080 --> 00:20:53.350 align:start position:0%
has a back. It has a place to sit. Now,
maybe<00:20:52.320><c> you</c><00:20:52.480><c> think</c><00:20:52.640><c> you</c><00:20:52.799><c> just</c><00:20:52.960><c> need</c><00:20:53.039><c> to</c><00:20:53.200><c> add</c>

00:20:53.350 --> 00:20:53.360 align:start position:0%
maybe you think you just need to add
 

00:20:53.360 --> 00:20:55.029 align:start position:0%
maybe you think you just need to add
more<00:20:53.600><c> qualities</c><00:20:53.919><c> to</c><00:20:54.080><c> your</c><00:20:54.240><c> concept</c><00:20:54.480><c> of</c><00:20:54.640><c> chair.</c>

00:20:55.029 --> 00:20:55.039 align:start position:0%
more qualities to your concept of chair.
 

00:20:55.039 --> 00:20:56.950 align:start position:0%
more qualities to your concept of chair.
Like,<00:20:55.360><c> okay,</c><00:20:55.679><c> chairs</c><00:20:56.080><c> aren't</c><00:20:56.320><c> made</c><00:20:56.480><c> of</c><00:20:56.720><c> living</c>

00:20:56.950 --> 00:20:56.960 align:start position:0%
Like, okay, chairs aren't made of living
 

00:20:56.960 --> 00:20:59.190 align:start position:0%
Like, okay, chairs aren't made of living
flesh<00:20:57.280><c> like</c><00:20:57.440><c> a</c><00:20:57.600><c> horse</c><00:20:57.760><c> is.</c><00:20:58.320><c> Fine.</c><00:20:58.720><c> How</c><00:20:58.880><c> about</c><00:20:58.960><c> a</c>

00:20:59.190 --> 00:20:59.200 align:start position:0%
flesh like a horse is. Fine. How about a
 

00:20:59.200 --> 00:21:01.110 align:start position:0%
flesh like a horse is. Fine. How about a
fake<00:20:59.360><c> horse?</c><00:20:59.760><c> Is</c><00:20:59.919><c> that</c><00:21:00.080><c> a</c><00:21:00.240><c> chair?</c><00:21:00.640><c> The</c><00:21:00.880><c> problem</c>

00:21:01.110 --> 00:21:01.120 align:start position:0%
fake horse? Is that a chair? The problem
 

00:21:01.120 --> 00:21:02.549 align:start position:0%
fake horse? Is that a chair? The problem
here<00:21:01.360><c> is</c><00:21:01.520><c> that</c><00:21:01.679><c> you</c><00:21:01.840><c> will</c><00:21:02.000><c> never</c><00:21:02.159><c> actually</c><00:21:02.400><c> be</c>

00:21:02.549 --> 00:21:02.559 align:start position:0%
here is that you will never actually be
 

00:21:02.559 --> 00:21:04.070 align:start position:0%
here is that you will never actually be
able<00:21:02.720><c> to</c><00:21:02.799><c> provide</c><00:21:03.039><c> a</c><00:21:03.200><c> set</c><00:21:03.280><c> of</c><00:21:03.440><c> qualities</c><00:21:03.840><c> that</c>

00:21:04.070 --> 00:21:04.080 align:start position:0%
able to provide a set of qualities that
 

00:21:04.080 --> 00:21:06.230 align:start position:0%
able to provide a set of qualities that
draws<00:21:04.400><c> a</c><00:21:04.640><c> perfect</c><00:21:04.880><c> circle</c><00:21:05.360><c> around</c><00:21:05.679><c> all</c><00:21:06.000><c> things</c>

00:21:06.230 --> 00:21:06.240 align:start position:0%
draws a perfect circle around all things
 

00:21:06.240 --> 00:21:08.149 align:start position:0%
draws a perfect circle around all things
we<00:21:06.480><c> call</c><00:21:06.720><c> chairs</c><00:21:07.280><c> while</c><00:21:07.520><c> excluding</c><00:21:07.919><c> all</c>

00:21:08.149 --> 00:21:08.159 align:start position:0%
we call chairs while excluding all
 

00:21:08.159 --> 00:21:09.990 align:start position:0%
we call chairs while excluding all
things<00:21:08.400><c> that</c><00:21:08.559><c> we</c><00:21:08.720><c> don't</c><00:21:08.960><c> call</c><00:21:09.200><c> chairs.</c><00:21:09.840><c> There</c>

00:21:09.990 --> 00:21:10.000 align:start position:0%
things that we don't call chairs. There
 

00:21:10.000 --> 00:21:11.990 align:start position:0%
things that we don't call chairs. There
will<00:21:10.159><c> always</c><00:21:10.480><c> be</c><00:21:10.720><c> some</c><00:21:11.039><c> edge</c><00:21:11.360><c> case</c><00:21:11.760><c> because</c>

00:21:11.990 --> 00:21:12.000 align:start position:0%
will always be some edge case because
 

00:21:12.000 --> 00:21:14.149 align:start position:0%
will always be some edge case because
even<00:21:12.320><c> after</c><00:21:12.559><c> we've</c><00:21:12.799><c> attached</c><00:21:13.200><c> over</c><00:21:13.440><c> 9,000</c>

00:21:14.149 --> 00:21:14.159 align:start position:0%
even after we've attached over 9,000
 

00:21:14.159 --> 00:21:16.390 align:start position:0%
even after we've attached over 9,000
qualities<00:21:14.640><c> to</c><00:21:14.799><c> the</c><00:21:14.960><c> signifier,</c><00:21:15.679><c> some</c><00:21:16.080><c> rare</c>

00:21:16.390 --> 00:21:16.400 align:start position:0%
qualities to the signifier, some rare
 

00:21:16.400 --> 00:21:18.549 align:start position:0%
qualities to the signifier, some rare
item<00:21:16.799><c> will</c><00:21:17.039><c> require</c><00:21:17.440><c> 901</c><00:21:18.000><c> to</c><00:21:18.159><c> be</c><00:21:18.240><c> truly</c>

00:21:18.549 --> 00:21:18.559 align:start position:0%
item will require 901 to be truly
 

00:21:18.559 --> 00:21:20.149 align:start position:0%
item will require 901 to be truly
excluded<00:21:18.960><c> per</c><00:21:19.200><c> the</c><00:21:19.360><c> strictest</c><00:21:19.760><c> definition</c><00:21:20.000><c> of</c>

00:21:20.149 --> 00:21:20.159 align:start position:0%
excluded per the strictest definition of
 

00:21:20.159 --> 00:21:21.669 align:start position:0%
excluded per the strictest definition of
the<00:21:20.320><c> word.</c><00:21:20.640><c> Another</c><00:21:20.880><c> way</c><00:21:20.960><c> to</c><00:21:21.120><c> look</c><00:21:21.200><c> at</c><00:21:21.360><c> this</c><00:21:21.520><c> is</c>

00:21:21.669 --> 00:21:21.679 align:start position:0%
the word. Another way to look at this is
 

00:21:21.679 --> 00:21:23.750 align:start position:0%
the word. Another way to look at this is
we've<00:21:21.919><c> returned</c><00:21:22.159><c> to</c><00:21:22.320><c> Loki's</c><00:21:22.720><c> wager</c><00:21:23.039><c> again.</c><00:21:23.600><c> A</c>

00:21:23.750 --> 00:21:23.760 align:start position:0%
we've returned to Loki's wager again. A
 

00:21:23.760 --> 00:21:25.430 align:start position:0%
we've returned to Loki's wager again. A
second<00:21:24.080><c> philosopher</c><00:21:24.640><c> of</c><00:21:24.799><c> language</c><00:21:25.120><c> that</c><00:21:25.280><c> I</c>

00:21:25.430 --> 00:21:25.440 align:start position:0%
second philosopher of language that I
 

00:21:25.440 --> 00:21:26.710 align:start position:0%
second philosopher of language that I
had<00:21:25.600><c> the</c><00:21:25.760><c> opportunity</c><00:21:26.000><c> to</c><00:21:26.159><c> read</c><00:21:26.320><c> while</c><00:21:26.480><c> at</c>

00:21:26.710 --> 00:21:26.720 align:start position:0%
had the opportunity to read while at
 

00:21:26.720 --> 00:21:28.789 align:start position:0%
had the opportunity to read while at
school<00:21:26.960><c> was</c><00:21:27.200><c> Vickenstein.</c><00:21:28.000><c> In</c><00:21:28.240><c> his</c><00:21:28.559><c> most</c>

00:21:28.789 --> 00:21:28.799 align:start position:0%
school was Vickenstein. In his most
 

00:21:28.799 --> 00:21:30.310 align:start position:0%
school was Vickenstein. In his most
well-known<00:21:29.280><c> book,</c><00:21:29.679><c> Philosophical</c>

00:21:30.310 --> 00:21:30.320 align:start position:0%
well-known book, Philosophical
 

00:21:30.320 --> 00:21:32.230 align:start position:0%
well-known book, Philosophical
Investigations,<00:21:31.120><c> he</c><00:21:31.360><c> formulated</c><00:21:31.840><c> his</c><00:21:32.080><c> most</c>

00:21:32.230 --> 00:21:32.240 align:start position:0%
Investigations, he formulated his most
 

00:21:32.240 --> 00:21:33.909 align:start position:0%
Investigations, he formulated his most
well-known<00:21:32.640><c> argument.</c><00:21:33.200><c> The</c><00:21:33.360><c> meaning</c><00:21:33.600><c> of</c><00:21:33.679><c> a</c>

00:21:33.909 --> 00:21:33.919 align:start position:0%
well-known argument. The meaning of a
 

00:21:33.919 --> 00:21:35.669 align:start position:0%
well-known argument. The meaning of a
word<00:21:34.080><c> is</c><00:21:34.320><c> in</c><00:21:34.480><c> its</c><00:21:34.640><c> use</c><00:21:34.799><c> in</c><00:21:34.960><c> the</c><00:21:35.120><c> language.</c>

00:21:35.669 --> 00:21:35.679 align:start position:0%
word is in its use in the language.
 

00:21:35.679 --> 00:21:37.350 align:start position:0%
word is in its use in the language.
Vickinstein<00:21:36.400><c> is</c><00:21:36.559><c> taking</c><00:21:36.720><c> a</c><00:21:36.960><c> completely</c>

00:21:37.350 --> 00:21:37.360 align:start position:0%
Vickinstein is taking a completely
 

00:21:37.360 --> 00:21:38.630 align:start position:0%
Vickinstein is taking a completely
different<00:21:37.679><c> approach</c><00:21:37.919><c> to</c><00:21:38.159><c> language</c><00:21:38.480><c> than</c>

00:21:38.630 --> 00:21:38.640 align:start position:0%
different approach to language than
 

00:21:38.640 --> 00:21:40.549 align:start position:0%
different approach to language than
Dereda<00:21:39.120><c> is.</c><00:21:39.360><c> For</c><00:21:39.520><c> Derrida,</c><00:21:40.080><c> meaning</c><00:21:40.400><c> is</c>

00:21:40.549 --> 00:21:40.559 align:start position:0%
Dereda is. For Derrida, meaning is
 

00:21:40.559 --> 00:21:42.230 align:start position:0%
Dereda is. For Derrida, meaning is
derived<00:21:40.960><c> by</c><00:21:41.039><c> a</c><00:21:41.280><c> word's</c><00:21:41.600><c> relationship</c><00:21:42.000><c> to</c>

00:21:42.230 --> 00:21:42.240 align:start position:0%
derived by a word's relationship to
 

00:21:42.240 --> 00:21:44.390 align:start position:0%
derived by a word's relationship to
other<00:21:42.480><c> words.</c><00:21:42.880><c> For</c><00:21:43.120><c> Vickinstein,</c><00:21:43.840><c> meaning</c><00:21:44.159><c> is</c>

00:21:44.390 --> 00:21:44.400 align:start position:0%
other words. For Vickinstein, meaning is
 

00:21:44.400 --> 00:21:46.390 align:start position:0%
other words. For Vickinstein, meaning is
derived<00:21:44.799><c> by</c><00:21:45.039><c> empirically</c><00:21:45.679><c> observing</c><00:21:46.159><c> the</c>

00:21:46.390 --> 00:21:46.400 align:start position:0%
derived by empirically observing the
 

00:21:46.400 --> 00:21:48.789 align:start position:0%
derived by empirically observing the
realworld<00:21:47.120><c> thing</c><00:21:47.600><c> that</c><00:21:47.840><c> humans</c><00:21:48.240><c> use</c><00:21:48.400><c> the</c><00:21:48.640><c> word</c>

00:21:48.789 --> 00:21:48.799 align:start position:0%
realworld thing that humans use the word
 

00:21:48.799 --> 00:21:50.789 align:start position:0%
realworld thing that humans use the word
to<00:21:48.960><c> refer</c><00:21:49.200><c> to.</c><00:21:49.600><c> While</c><00:21:49.760><c> Derida</c><00:21:50.320><c> might</c><00:21:50.480><c> derive</c>

00:21:50.789 --> 00:21:50.799 align:start position:0%
to refer to. While Derida might derive
 

00:21:50.799 --> 00:21:52.470 align:start position:0%
to refer to. While Derida might derive
meaning<00:21:51.039><c> for</c><00:21:51.200><c> the</c><00:21:51.280><c> word</c><00:21:51.520><c> chair</c><00:21:51.919><c> by</c><00:21:52.080><c> observing</c>

00:21:52.470 --> 00:21:52.480 align:start position:0%
meaning for the word chair by observing
 

00:21:52.480 --> 00:21:54.070 align:start position:0%
meaning for the word chair by observing
its<00:21:52.720><c> relationships</c><00:21:53.200><c> to</c><00:21:53.360><c> the</c><00:21:53.520><c> idea</c><00:21:53.679><c> of</c><00:21:53.840><c> having</c>

00:21:54.070 --> 00:21:54.080 align:start position:0%
its relationships to the idea of having
 

00:21:54.080 --> 00:21:55.510 align:start position:0%
its relationships to the idea of having
four<00:21:54.320><c> legs</c><00:21:54.559><c> and</c><00:21:54.640><c> a</c><00:21:54.799><c> back</c><00:21:55.039><c> and</c><00:21:55.120><c> a</c><00:21:55.280><c> seat.</c>

00:21:55.510 --> 00:21:55.520 align:start position:0%
four legs and a back and a seat.
 

00:21:55.520 --> 00:21:56.950 align:start position:0%
four legs and a back and a seat.
Victinstein<00:21:56.159><c> derives</c><00:21:56.480><c> meaning</c><00:21:56.720><c> from</c><00:21:56.880><c> the</c>

00:21:56.950 --> 00:21:56.960 align:start position:0%
Victinstein derives meaning from the
 

00:21:56.960 --> 00:21:58.710 align:start position:0%
Victinstein derives meaning from the
word<00:21:57.120><c> chair</c><00:21:57.520><c> by</c><00:21:57.760><c> looking</c><00:21:57.919><c> at</c><00:21:58.080><c> a</c><00:21:58.320><c> real</c><00:21:58.559><c> life</c>

00:21:58.710 --> 00:21:58.720 align:start position:0%
word chair by looking at a real life
 

00:21:58.720 --> 00:22:00.549 align:start position:0%
word chair by looking at a real life
chair.<00:21:59.200><c> And</c><00:21:59.360><c> while</c><00:21:59.520><c> Dereda's</c><00:22:00.080><c> method</c><00:22:00.320><c> might</c>

00:22:00.549 --> 00:22:00.559 align:start position:0%
chair. And while Dereda's method might
 

00:22:00.559 --> 00:22:01.830 align:start position:0%
chair. And while Dereda's method might
have<00:22:00.720><c> problems</c><00:22:01.039><c> differentiating</c><00:22:01.520><c> between</c><00:22:01.679><c> a</c>

00:22:01.830 --> 00:22:01.840 align:start position:0%
have problems differentiating between a
 

00:22:01.840 --> 00:22:03.669 align:start position:0%
have problems differentiating between a
chair<00:22:02.000><c> and</c><00:22:02.159><c> a</c><00:22:02.240><c> horse,</c><00:22:02.559><c> for</c><00:22:02.720><c> Vickinstein</c><00:22:03.440><c> there</c>

00:22:03.669 --> 00:22:03.679 align:start position:0%
chair and a horse, for Vickinstein there
 

00:22:03.679 --> 00:22:05.590 align:start position:0%
chair and a horse, for Vickinstein there
is<00:22:03.840><c> no</c><00:22:04.000><c> such</c><00:22:04.320><c> problem.</c><00:22:04.720><c> He</c><00:22:04.960><c> simply</c><00:22:05.200><c> points</c><00:22:05.440><c> at</c>

00:22:05.590 --> 00:22:05.600 align:start position:0%
is no such problem. He simply points at
 

00:22:05.600 --> 00:22:07.190 align:start position:0%
is no such problem. He simply points at
the<00:22:05.760><c> horse</c><00:22:05.919><c> and</c><00:22:06.080><c> the</c><00:22:06.240><c> chair</c><00:22:06.480><c> and</c><00:22:06.720><c> the</c><00:22:06.880><c> argument</c>

00:22:07.190 --> 00:22:07.200 align:start position:0%
the horse and the chair and the argument
 

00:22:07.200 --> 00:22:09.190 align:start position:0%
the horse and the chair and the argument
is<00:22:07.360><c> settled.</c><00:22:08.000><c> So,</c><00:22:08.320><c> let's</c><00:22:08.559><c> bring</c><00:22:08.799><c> all</c><00:22:08.960><c> this</c>

00:22:09.190 --> 00:22:09.200 align:start position:0%
is settled. So, let's bring all this
 

00:22:09.200 --> 00:22:10.950 align:start position:0%
is settled. So, let's bring all this
back<00:22:09.280><c> to</c><00:22:09.440><c> the</c><00:22:09.600><c> question</c><00:22:09.840><c> at</c><00:22:10.080><c> hand,</c><00:22:10.400><c> which</c><00:22:10.640><c> is</c>

00:22:10.950 --> 00:22:10.960 align:start position:0%
back to the question at hand, which is
 

00:22:10.960 --> 00:22:12.789 align:start position:0%
back to the question at hand, which is
what<00:22:11.200><c> is</c><00:22:11.280><c> a</c><00:22:11.440><c> woman?</c><00:22:11.840><c> The</c><00:22:12.080><c> reason</c><00:22:12.240><c> we're</c><00:22:12.559><c> asking</c>

00:22:12.789 --> 00:22:12.799 align:start position:0%
what is a woman? The reason we're asking
 

00:22:12.799 --> 00:22:14.789 align:start position:0%
what is a woman? The reason we're asking
that<00:22:13.120><c> question</c><00:22:13.440><c> is</c><00:22:13.679><c> because</c><00:22:13.919><c> we</c><00:22:14.159><c> want</c><00:22:14.320><c> to</c><00:22:14.559><c> see</c>

00:22:14.789 --> 00:22:14.799 align:start position:0%
that question is because we want to see
 

00:22:14.799 --> 00:22:16.630 align:start position:0%
that question is because we want to see
if<00:22:15.120><c> trans</c><00:22:15.440><c> women</c><00:22:15.760><c> fall</c><00:22:15.919><c> under</c><00:22:16.159><c> the</c><00:22:16.400><c> umbrella</c>

00:22:16.630 --> 00:22:16.640 align:start position:0%
if trans women fall under the umbrella
 

00:22:16.640 --> 00:22:18.470 align:start position:0%
if trans women fall under the umbrella
of<00:22:16.880><c> woman,</c><00:22:17.120><c> if</c><00:22:17.360><c> they</c><00:22:17.520><c> fit</c><00:22:17.679><c> into</c><00:22:17.840><c> the</c><00:22:18.000><c> bucket</c><00:22:18.320><c> of</c>

00:22:18.470 --> 00:22:18.480 align:start position:0%
of woman, if they fit into the bucket of
 

00:22:18.480 --> 00:22:20.390 align:start position:0%
of woman, if they fit into the bucket of
woman.<00:22:19.039><c> Well,</c><00:22:19.280><c> for</c><00:22:19.440><c> Derida,</c><00:22:20.000><c> we</c><00:22:20.159><c> discover</c>

00:22:20.390 --> 00:22:20.400 align:start position:0%
woman. Well, for Derida, we discover
 

00:22:20.400 --> 00:22:21.909 align:start position:0%
woman. Well, for Derida, we discover
what<00:22:20.559><c> a</c><00:22:20.640><c> woman</c><00:22:20.880><c> is</c><00:22:21.120><c> by</c><00:22:21.280><c> examining</c><00:22:21.679><c> its</c>

00:22:21.909 --> 00:22:21.919 align:start position:0%
what a woman is by examining its
 

00:22:21.919 --> 00:22:23.510 align:start position:0%
what a woman is by examining its
qualities<00:22:22.320><c> and</c><00:22:22.559><c> then</c><00:22:22.720><c> tracing</c><00:22:23.039><c> the</c><00:22:23.200><c> web</c><00:22:23.360><c> of</c>

00:22:23.510 --> 00:22:23.520 align:start position:0%
qualities and then tracing the web of
 

00:22:23.520 --> 00:22:25.430 align:start position:0%
qualities and then tracing the web of
meaning.<00:22:24.080><c> There</c><00:22:24.320><c> is</c><00:22:24.559><c> one</c><00:22:24.880><c> definition</c><00:22:25.280><c> of</c>

00:22:25.430 --> 00:22:25.440 align:start position:0%
meaning. There is one definition of
 

00:22:25.440 --> 00:22:27.350 align:start position:0%
meaning. There is one definition of
woman<00:22:25.840><c> that</c><00:22:26.080><c> actually</c><00:22:26.480><c> functions</c><00:22:26.799><c> as</c><00:22:26.960><c> a</c><00:22:27.120><c> very</c>

00:22:27.350 --> 00:22:27.360 align:start position:0%
woman that actually functions as a very
 

00:22:27.360 --> 00:22:28.789 align:start position:0%
woman that actually functions as a very
easy<00:22:27.600><c> web</c><00:22:27.840><c> of</c><00:22:27.919><c> meaning</c><00:22:28.159><c> to</c><00:22:28.320><c> trace</c><00:22:28.640><c> and</c>

00:22:28.789 --> 00:22:28.799 align:start position:0%
easy web of meaning to trace and
 

00:22:28.799 --> 00:22:30.630 align:start position:0%
easy web of meaning to trace and
right-wingers<00:22:29.440><c> love</c><00:22:29.600><c> repeating</c><00:22:29.919><c> it.</c><00:22:30.240><c> Adult,</c>

00:22:30.630 --> 00:22:30.640 align:start position:0%
right-wingers love repeating it. Adult,
 

00:22:30.640 --> 00:22:32.789 align:start position:0%
right-wingers love repeating it. Adult,
human,<00:22:30.960><c> female.</c><00:22:31.520><c> Those</c><00:22:31.919><c> are</c><00:22:32.159><c> three</c><00:22:32.480><c> qualities</c>

00:22:32.789 --> 00:22:32.799 align:start position:0%
human, female. Those are three qualities
 

00:22:32.799 --> 00:22:34.630 align:start position:0%
human, female. Those are three qualities
that<00:22:33.039><c> the</c><00:22:33.200><c> word</c><00:22:33.440><c> woman</c><00:22:33.679><c> contains</c><00:22:34.000><c> within</c><00:22:34.240><c> it.</c>

00:22:34.630 --> 00:22:34.640 align:start position:0%
that the word woman contains within it.
 

00:22:34.640 --> 00:22:36.870 align:start position:0%
that the word woman contains within it.
So,<00:22:34.880><c> are</c><00:22:35.120><c> trans</c><00:22:35.360><c> women</c><00:22:35.600><c> adults?</c><00:22:36.240><c> Yes.</c><00:22:36.640><c> Are</c>

00:22:36.870 --> 00:22:36.880 align:start position:0%
So, are trans women adults? Yes. Are
 

00:22:36.880 --> 00:22:39.110 align:start position:0%
So, are trans women adults? Yes. Are
they<00:22:37.039><c> human?</c><00:22:37.520><c> Yes.</c><00:22:37.919><c> Are</c><00:22:38.080><c> they</c><00:22:38.240><c> female?</c><00:22:38.880><c> Well,</c>

00:22:39.110 --> 00:22:39.120 align:start position:0%
they human? Yes. Are they female? Well,
 

00:22:39.120 --> 00:22:41.190 align:start position:0%
they human? Yes. Are they female? Well,
if<00:22:39.360><c> the</c><00:22:39.520><c> answer</c><00:22:39.679><c> to</c><00:22:39.840><c> that</c><00:22:40.000><c> is</c><00:22:40.240><c> no,</c><00:22:40.640><c> then</c><00:22:40.880><c> trans</c>

00:22:41.190 --> 00:22:41.200 align:start position:0%
if the answer to that is no, then trans
 

00:22:41.200 --> 00:22:43.029 align:start position:0%
if the answer to that is no, then trans
women<00:22:41.520><c> aren't</c><00:22:41.760><c> women.</c><00:22:42.080><c> And</c><00:22:42.240><c> both</c><00:22:42.400><c> Niara</c><00:22:42.960><c> and</c>

00:22:43.029 --> 00:22:43.039 align:start position:0%
women aren't women. And both Niara and
 

00:22:43.039 --> 00:22:44.870 align:start position:0%
women aren't women. And both Niara and
the<00:22:43.200><c> Ritoids</c><00:22:43.679><c> know</c><00:22:43.840><c> this,</c><00:22:44.080><c> which</c><00:22:44.320><c> is</c><00:22:44.480><c> why</c><00:22:44.640><c> they</c>

00:22:44.870 --> 00:22:44.880 align:start position:0%
the Ritoids know this, which is why they
 

00:22:44.880 --> 00:22:47.110 align:start position:0%
the Ritoids know this, which is why they
both<00:22:45.200><c> desperately</c><00:22:45.760><c> fight</c><00:22:46.080><c> on</c><00:22:46.240><c> those</c><00:22:46.480><c> grounds.</c>

00:22:47.110 --> 00:22:47.120 align:start position:0%
both desperately fight on those grounds.
 

00:22:47.120 --> 00:22:48.950 align:start position:0%
both desperately fight on those grounds.
There<00:22:47.360><c> are</c><00:22:47.600><c> of</c><00:22:47.840><c> course</c><00:22:48.080><c> other</c><00:22:48.320><c> options.</c>

00:22:48.950 --> 00:22:48.960 align:start position:0%
There are of course other options.
 

00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:50.549 align:start position:0%
There are of course other options.
Another<00:22:49.280><c> valid</c><00:22:49.600><c> web</c><00:22:49.840><c> of</c><00:22:49.919><c> meaning</c><00:22:50.240><c> would</c><00:22:50.480><c> be</c>

00:22:50.549 --> 00:22:50.559 align:start position:0%
Another valid web of meaning would be
 

00:22:50.559 --> 00:22:52.070 align:start position:0%
Another valid web of meaning would be
something<00:22:50.880><c> like</c><00:22:51.200><c> if</c><00:22:51.440><c> you</c><00:22:51.520><c> look</c><00:22:51.600><c> like</c><00:22:51.760><c> a</c><00:22:51.840><c> woman,</c>

00:22:52.070 --> 00:22:52.080 align:start position:0%
something like if you look like a woman,
 

00:22:52.080 --> 00:22:53.590 align:start position:0%
something like if you look like a woman,
you<00:22:52.240><c> are</c><00:22:52.320><c> a</c><00:22:52.480><c> woman.</c><00:22:52.799><c> That</c><00:22:52.960><c> includes</c><00:22:53.280><c> passers</c>

00:22:53.590 --> 00:22:53.600 align:start position:0%
you are a woman. That includes passers
 

00:22:53.600 --> 00:22:55.510 align:start position:0%
you are a woman. That includes passers
like<00:22:53.760><c> Taftage,</c><00:22:54.400><c> but</c><00:22:54.559><c> it</c><00:22:54.720><c> would</c><00:22:54.880><c> not</c><00:22:55.120><c> include</c>

00:22:55.510 --> 00:22:55.520 align:start position:0%
like Taftage, but it would not include
 

00:22:55.520 --> 00:22:57.110 align:start position:0%
like Taftage, but it would not include
non-passers,<00:22:56.400><c> which</c><00:22:56.559><c> is</c><00:22:56.640><c> why</c><00:22:56.880><c> trans</c>

00:22:57.110 --> 00:22:57.120 align:start position:0%
non-passers, which is why trans
 

00:22:57.120 --> 00:22:58.470 align:start position:0%
non-passers, which is why trans
activists<00:22:57.440><c> like</c><00:22:57.600><c> Nara</c><00:22:57.840><c> are</c><00:22:58.000><c> considered</c><00:22:58.240><c> to</c><00:22:58.400><c> be</c>

00:22:58.470 --> 00:22:58.480 align:start position:0%
activists like Nara are considered to be
 

00:22:58.480 --> 00:23:00.310 align:start position:0%
activists like Nara are considered to be
transphobic.<00:22:59.120><c> To</c><00:22:59.360><c> her,</c><00:22:59.600><c> it</c><00:22:59.840><c> is</c><00:23:00.000><c> simply</c>

00:23:00.310 --> 00:23:00.320 align:start position:0%
transphobic. To her, it is simply
 

00:23:00.320 --> 00:23:02.390 align:start position:0%
transphobic. To her, it is simply
unacceptable<00:23:01.039><c> if</c><00:23:01.360><c> anybody</c><00:23:01.679><c> who</c><00:23:01.919><c> wants</c><00:23:02.159><c> to</c><00:23:02.240><c> be</c>

00:23:02.390 --> 00:23:02.400 align:start position:0%
unacceptable if anybody who wants to be
 

00:23:02.400 --> 00:23:04.070 align:start position:0%
unacceptable if anybody who wants to be
included<00:23:02.799><c> in</c><00:23:02.960><c> the</c><00:23:03.039><c> label</c><00:23:03.280><c> of</c><00:23:03.440><c> woman</c><00:23:03.679><c> is</c><00:23:03.919><c> left</c>

00:23:04.070 --> 00:23:04.080 align:start position:0%
included in the label of woman is left
 

00:23:04.080 --> 00:23:05.669 align:start position:0%
included in the label of woman is left
out<00:23:04.240><c> of</c><00:23:04.320><c> it.</c><00:23:04.640><c> However,</c><00:23:04.960><c> if</c><00:23:05.200><c> we</c><00:23:05.280><c> approach</c>

00:23:05.669 --> 00:23:05.679 align:start position:0%
out of it. However, if we approach
 

00:23:05.679 --> 00:23:07.190 align:start position:0%
out of it. However, if we approach
language<00:23:06.000><c> like</c><00:23:06.159><c> Vickinstein,</c><00:23:06.960><c> we</c>

00:23:07.190 --> 00:23:07.200 align:start position:0%
language like Vickinstein, we
 

00:23:07.200 --> 00:23:09.029 align:start position:0%
language like Vickinstein, we
immediately<00:23:07.760><c> solve</c><00:23:08.000><c> this</c><00:23:08.240><c> problem.</c><00:23:08.720><c> Trans</c>

00:23:09.029 --> 00:23:09.039 align:start position:0%
immediately solve this problem. Trans
 

00:23:09.039 --> 00:23:11.190 align:start position:0%
immediately solve this problem. Trans
women<00:23:09.360><c> are</c><00:23:09.600><c> women.</c><00:23:10.000><c> If</c><00:23:10.159><c> the</c><00:23:10.320><c> word</c><00:23:10.559><c> woman</c><00:23:10.960><c> is</c>

00:23:11.190 --> 00:23:11.200 align:start position:0%
women are women. If the word woman is
 

00:23:11.200 --> 00:23:13.270 align:start position:0%
women are women. If the word woman is
used<00:23:11.440><c> to</c><00:23:11.600><c> describe</c><00:23:11.919><c> them,</c><00:23:12.320><c> simple</c><00:23:12.640><c> as.</c><00:23:13.039><c> And</c>

00:23:13.270 --> 00:23:13.280 align:start position:0%
used to describe them, simple as. And
 

00:23:13.280 --> 00:23:15.430 align:start position:0%
used to describe them, simple as. And
because<00:23:13.679><c> most</c><00:23:14.080><c> people</c><00:23:14.559><c> would</c><00:23:14.880><c> use</c><00:23:15.039><c> the</c><00:23:15.280><c> word</c>

00:23:15.430 --> 00:23:15.440 align:start position:0%
because most people would use the word
 

00:23:15.440 --> 00:23:17.270 align:start position:0%
because most people would use the word
woman<00:23:15.679><c> to</c><00:23:15.840><c> describe</c><00:23:16.080><c> Taftach</c><00:23:16.799><c> because</c><00:23:16.960><c> she</c>

00:23:17.270 --> 00:23:17.280 align:start position:0%
woman to describe Taftach because she
 

00:23:17.280 --> 00:23:19.029 align:start position:0%
woman to describe Taftach because she
looks<00:23:17.440><c> like</c><00:23:17.600><c> one.</c><00:23:18.000><c> And</c><00:23:18.159><c> in</c><00:23:18.400><c> casual</c><00:23:18.720><c> public</c>

00:23:19.029 --> 00:23:19.039 align:start position:0%
looks like one. And in casual public
 

00:23:19.039 --> 00:23:20.710 align:start position:0%
looks like one. And in casual public
encounters,<00:23:19.600><c> that</c><00:23:19.840><c> is</c><00:23:20.000><c> actually</c><00:23:20.240><c> what</c><00:23:20.400><c> we</c><00:23:20.559><c> all</c>

00:23:20.710 --> 00:23:20.720 align:start position:0%
encounters, that is actually what we all
 

00:23:20.720 --> 00:23:22.470 align:start position:0%
encounters, that is actually what we all
go<00:23:20.799><c> by</c><00:23:21.039><c> in</c><00:23:21.200><c> real</c><00:23:21.360><c> life.</c><00:23:21.840><c> Then</c><00:23:22.000><c> the</c><00:23:22.159><c> meaning</c><00:23:22.320><c> of</c>

00:23:22.470 --> 00:23:22.480 align:start position:0%
go by in real life. Then the meaning of
 

00:23:22.480 --> 00:23:24.549 align:start position:0%
go by in real life. Then the meaning of
the<00:23:22.640><c> word</c><00:23:22.880><c> woman</c><00:23:23.360><c> includes</c><00:23:23.919><c> trans</c><00:23:24.159><c> women</c><00:23:24.400><c> like</c>

00:23:24.549 --> 00:23:24.559 align:start position:0%
the word woman includes trans women like
 

00:23:24.559 --> 00:23:26.390 align:start position:0%
the word woman includes trans women like
Taftach<00:23:25.200><c> because</c><00:23:25.360><c> that</c><00:23:25.520><c> is</c><00:23:25.679><c> how</c><00:23:25.760><c> the</c><00:23:26.000><c> word</c><00:23:26.159><c> is</c>

00:23:26.390 --> 00:23:26.400 align:start position:0%
Taftach because that is how the word is
 

00:23:26.400 --> 00:23:27.990 align:start position:0%
Taftach because that is how the word is
used.<00:23:26.960><c> Like</c><00:23:27.200><c> for</c><00:23:27.200><c> example,</c><00:23:27.520><c> if</c><00:23:27.679><c> you</c><00:23:27.760><c> turn</c><00:23:27.840><c> the</c>

00:23:27.990 --> 00:23:28.000 align:start position:0%
used. Like for example, if you turn the
 

00:23:28.000 --> 00:23:29.110 align:start position:0%
used. Like for example, if you turn the
corner<00:23:28.159><c> at</c><00:23:28.320><c> a</c><00:23:28.400><c> grocery</c><00:23:28.720><c> store</c><00:23:28.880><c> and</c>

00:23:29.110 --> 00:23:29.120 align:start position:0%
corner at a grocery store and
 

00:23:29.120 --> 00:23:30.789 align:start position:0%
corner at a grocery store and
accidentally<00:23:29.600><c> bump</c><00:23:29.840><c> into</c><00:23:30.000><c> a</c><00:23:30.159><c> woman,</c><00:23:30.480><c> do</c><00:23:30.640><c> you</c>

00:23:30.789 --> 00:23:30.799 align:start position:0%
accidentally bump into a woman, do you
 

00:23:30.799 --> 00:23:32.390 align:start position:0%
accidentally bump into a woman, do you
immediately<00:23:31.200><c> inspect</c><00:23:31.520><c> her</c><00:23:31.679><c> genitals</c><00:23:32.159><c> to</c><00:23:32.320><c> make</c>

00:23:32.390 --> 00:23:32.400 align:start position:0%
immediately inspect her genitals to make
 

00:23:32.400 --> 00:23:33.830 align:start position:0%
immediately inspect her genitals to make
sure<00:23:32.480><c> she's</c><00:23:32.799><c> actually</c><00:23:32.960><c> a</c><00:23:33.120><c> woman?</c><00:23:33.440><c> Obviously</c>

00:23:33.830 --> 00:23:33.840 align:start position:0%
sure she's actually a woman? Obviously
 

00:23:33.840 --> 00:23:35.190 align:start position:0%
sure she's actually a woman? Obviously
not.<00:23:34.159><c> You</c><00:23:34.320><c> go</c><00:23:34.400><c> by</c><00:23:34.640><c> what</c><00:23:34.720><c> you</c><00:23:34.799><c> see</c><00:23:34.960><c> in</c><00:23:35.120><c> the</c>

00:23:35.190 --> 00:23:35.200 align:start position:0%
not. You go by what you see in the
 

00:23:35.200 --> 00:23:36.710 align:start position:0%
not. You go by what you see in the
moment,<00:23:35.600><c> you</c><00:23:35.760><c> would</c><00:23:35.919><c> use</c><00:23:36.000><c> the</c><00:23:36.240><c> word</c><00:23:36.400><c> woman</c><00:23:36.559><c> to</c>

00:23:36.710 --> 00:23:36.720 align:start position:0%
moment, you would use the word woman to
 

00:23:36.720 --> 00:23:37.990 align:start position:0%
moment, you would use the word woman to
describe<00:23:37.039><c> that</c><00:23:37.200><c> person,</c><00:23:37.520><c> whether</c><00:23:37.760><c> they're</c>

00:23:37.990 --> 00:23:38.000 align:start position:0%
describe that person, whether they're
 

00:23:38.000 --> 00:23:40.070 align:start position:0%
describe that person, whether they're
female<00:23:38.320><c> or</c><00:23:38.480><c> not.</c><00:23:38.880><c> And</c><00:23:39.039><c> so</c><00:23:39.280><c> therefore,</c><00:23:39.760><c> they</c>

00:23:40.070 --> 00:23:40.080 align:start position:0%
female or not. And so therefore, they
 

00:23:40.080 --> 00:23:42.149 align:start position:0%
female or not. And so therefore, they
are<00:23:40.240><c> a</c><00:23:40.400><c> woman</c><00:23:40.720><c> because</c><00:23:40.960><c> per</c><00:23:41.280><c> Victinstein,</c><00:23:42.000><c> the</c>

00:23:42.149 --> 00:23:42.159 align:start position:0%
are a woman because per Victinstein, the
 

00:23:42.159 --> 00:23:43.830 align:start position:0%
are a woman because per Victinstein, the
definition<00:23:42.480><c> of</c><00:23:42.640><c> a</c><00:23:42.799><c> word</c><00:23:43.039><c> is</c><00:23:43.280><c> found</c><00:23:43.440><c> in</c><00:23:43.679><c> its</c>

00:23:43.830 --> 00:23:43.840 align:start position:0%
definition of a word is found in its
 

00:23:43.840 --> 00:23:46.149 align:start position:0%
definition of a word is found in its
use.<00:23:44.480><c> However,</c><00:23:44.880><c> if</c><00:23:45.120><c> the</c><00:23:45.280><c> problem</c><00:23:45.440><c> with</c><00:23:45.600><c> Dereda</c>

00:23:46.149 --> 00:23:46.159 align:start position:0%
use. However, if the problem with Dereda
 

00:23:46.159 --> 00:23:47.669 align:start position:0%
use. However, if the problem with Dereda
for<00:23:46.240><c> Niara</c><00:23:46.720><c> and</c><00:23:46.880><c> other</c><00:23:47.039><c> transact</c><00:23:47.280><c> activists</c>

00:23:47.669 --> 00:23:47.679 align:start position:0%
for Niara and other transact activists
 

00:23:47.679 --> 00:23:49.430 align:start position:0%
for Niara and other transact activists
like<00:23:47.840><c> her</c><00:23:48.080><c> is</c><00:23:48.240><c> that</c><00:23:48.480><c> their</c><00:23:48.720><c> view</c><00:23:48.960><c> of</c><00:23:49.039><c> the</c><00:23:49.280><c> word</c>

00:23:49.430 --> 00:23:49.440 align:start position:0%
like her is that their view of the word
 

00:23:49.440 --> 00:23:51.430 align:start position:0%
like her is that their view of the word
woman<00:23:49.679><c> is</c><00:23:49.840><c> self-referential</c><00:23:50.799><c> and</c><00:23:50.960><c> therefore</c>

00:23:51.430 --> 00:23:51.440 align:start position:0%
woman is self-referential and therefore
 

00:23:51.440 --> 00:23:53.029 align:start position:0%
woman is self-referential and therefore
unable<00:23:51.840><c> to</c><00:23:51.919><c> actually</c><00:23:52.159><c> contain</c><00:23:52.400><c> any</c><00:23:52.720><c> meaning,</c>

00:23:53.029 --> 00:23:53.039 align:start position:0%
unable to actually contain any meaning,
 

00:23:53.039 --> 00:23:54.789 align:start position:0%
unable to actually contain any meaning,
the<00:23:53.200><c> problem</c><00:23:53.360><c> with</c><00:23:53.600><c> Vickinstein</c><00:23:54.320><c> is</c><00:23:54.480><c> that</c><00:23:54.640><c> if</c>

00:23:54.789 --> 00:23:54.799 align:start position:0%
the problem with Vickinstein is that if
 

00:23:54.799 --> 00:23:56.870 align:start position:0%
the problem with Vickinstein is that if
somebody<00:23:55.120><c> uses</c><00:23:55.440><c> the</c><00:23:55.600><c> word</c><00:23:55.919><c> man</c><00:23:56.320><c> to</c><00:23:56.559><c> describe</c>

00:23:56.870 --> 00:23:56.880 align:start position:0%
somebody uses the word man to describe
 

00:23:56.880 --> 00:23:58.710 align:start position:0%
somebody uses the word man to describe
trans<00:23:57.120><c> women,</c><00:23:57.520><c> that</c><00:23:57.760><c> is</c><00:23:57.919><c> actually</c><00:23:58.240><c> just</c><00:23:58.480><c> as</c>

00:23:58.710 --> 00:23:58.720 align:start position:0%
trans women, that is actually just as
 

00:23:58.720 --> 00:24:00.149 align:start position:0%
trans women, that is actually just as
valid<00:23:59.039><c> as</c><00:23:59.200><c> if</c><00:23:59.440><c> somebody</c><00:23:59.600><c> uses</c><00:23:59.840><c> the</c><00:24:00.000><c> word</c>

00:24:00.149 --> 00:24:00.159 align:start position:0%
valid as if somebody uses the word
 

00:24:00.159 --> 00:24:02.149 align:start position:0%
valid as if somebody uses the word
woman.<00:24:00.559><c> Let</c><00:24:00.720><c> me</c><00:24:00.880><c> explain.</c><00:24:01.360><c> This</c><00:24:01.600><c> idea</c><00:24:01.840><c> of</c>

00:24:02.149 --> 00:24:02.159 align:start position:0%
woman. Let me explain. This idea of
 

00:24:02.159 --> 00:24:04.230 align:start position:0%
woman. Let me explain. This idea of
definition<00:24:02.559><c> as</c><00:24:02.880><c> use</c><00:24:03.280><c> applies</c><00:24:03.679><c> not</c><00:24:03.919><c> only</c><00:24:04.080><c> to</c>

00:24:04.230 --> 00:24:04.240 align:start position:0%
definition as use applies not only to
 

00:24:04.240 --> 00:24:06.390 align:start position:0%
definition as use applies not only to
languages<00:24:04.799><c> but</c><00:24:05.120><c> sub</c><00:24:05.360><c> languages</c><00:24:05.760><c> as</c><00:24:06.000><c> well.</c>

00:24:06.390 --> 00:24:06.400 align:start position:0%
languages but sub languages as well.
 

00:24:06.400 --> 00:24:08.470 align:start position:0%
languages but sub languages as well.
Words<00:24:06.720><c> from</c><00:24:06.880><c> the</c><00:24:07.120><c> larger</c><00:24:07.440><c> monoculture</c><00:24:08.240><c> can</c>

00:24:08.470 --> 00:24:08.480 align:start position:0%
Words from the larger monoculture can
 

00:24:08.480 --> 00:24:10.470 align:start position:0%
Words from the larger monoculture can
take<00:24:08.640><c> on</c><00:24:08.880><c> different</c><00:24:09.440><c> specialized</c><00:24:10.000><c> meanings</c>

00:24:10.470 --> 00:24:10.480 align:start position:0%
take on different specialized meanings
 

00:24:10.480 --> 00:24:12.549 align:start position:0%
take on different specialized meanings
within<00:24:10.880><c> different</c><00:24:11.200><c> subcultures.</c><00:24:12.080><c> They</c><00:24:12.400><c> may</c>

00:24:12.549 --> 00:24:12.559 align:start position:0%
within different subcultures. They may
 

00:24:12.559 --> 00:24:14.710 align:start position:0%
within different subcultures. They may
derive<00:24:13.039><c> their</c><00:24:13.360><c> specific</c><00:24:13.760><c> meaning</c><00:24:14.240><c> from</c><00:24:14.480><c> the</c>

00:24:14.710 --> 00:24:14.720 align:start position:0%
derive their specific meaning from the
 

00:24:14.720 --> 00:24:16.630 align:start position:0%
derive their specific meaning from the
same<00:24:14.880><c> general</c><00:24:15.279><c> meaning,</c><00:24:15.679><c> but</c><00:24:15.919><c> these</c><00:24:16.240><c> specific</c>

00:24:16.630 --> 00:24:16.640 align:start position:0%
same general meaning, but these specific
 

00:24:16.640 --> 00:24:18.710 align:start position:0%
same general meaning, but these specific
meanings<00:24:17.120><c> are</c><00:24:17.360><c> not</c><00:24:17.600><c> actually</c><00:24:17.919><c> compatible.</c>

00:24:18.710 --> 00:24:18.720 align:start position:0%
meanings are not actually compatible.
 

00:24:18.720 --> 00:24:21.190 align:start position:0%
meanings are not actually compatible.
For<00:24:18.799><c> example,</c><00:24:19.279><c> the</c><00:24:19.520><c> words</c><00:24:20.000><c> master</c><00:24:20.400><c> and</c><00:24:20.640><c> slave</c>

00:24:21.190 --> 00:24:21.200 align:start position:0%
For example, the words master and slave
 

00:24:21.200 --> 00:24:23.350 align:start position:0%
For example, the words master and slave
mean<00:24:21.520><c> something</c><00:24:21.840><c> very</c><00:24:22.240><c> different</c><00:24:22.480><c> in</c><00:24:22.799><c> say</c><00:24:23.120><c> the</c>

00:24:23.350 --> 00:24:23.360 align:start position:0%
mean something very different in say the
 

00:24:23.360 --> 00:24:25.110 align:start position:0%
mean something very different in say the
kink<00:24:23.760><c> community</c><00:24:24.240><c> where</c><00:24:24.480><c> it</c><00:24:24.640><c> describes</c>

00:24:25.110 --> 00:24:25.120 align:start position:0%
kink community where it describes
 

00:24:25.120 --> 00:24:26.950 align:start position:0%
kink community where it describes
specific<00:24:25.440><c> roles</c><00:24:25.679><c> in</c><00:24:25.760><c> a</c><00:24:25.919><c> sexual</c><00:24:26.240><c> relationship</c>

00:24:26.950 --> 00:24:26.960 align:start position:0%
specific roles in a sexual relationship
 

00:24:26.960 --> 00:24:28.710 align:start position:0%
specific roles in a sexual relationship
versus<00:24:27.279><c> the</c><00:24:27.600><c> computing</c><00:24:28.000><c> community</c><00:24:28.400><c> where</c><00:24:28.559><c> it</c>

00:24:28.710 --> 00:24:28.720 align:start position:0%
versus the computing community where it
 

00:24:28.720 --> 00:24:30.310 align:start position:0%
versus the computing community where it
describes<00:24:29.120><c> how</c><00:24:29.360><c> different</c><00:24:29.600><c> systems</c><00:24:29.919><c> within</c><00:24:30.159><c> a</c>

00:24:30.310 --> 00:24:30.320 align:start position:0%
describes how different systems within a
 

00:24:30.320 --> 00:24:31.909 align:start position:0%
describes how different systems within a
computer<00:24:30.720><c> may</c><00:24:30.960><c> be</c><00:24:31.120><c> controlled</c><00:24:31.440><c> by</c><00:24:31.679><c> other</c>

00:24:31.909 --> 00:24:31.919 align:start position:0%
computer may be controlled by other
 

00:24:31.919 --> 00:24:33.909 align:start position:0%
computer may be controlled by other
systems.<00:24:32.480><c> The</c><00:24:32.720><c> words</c><00:24:32.960><c> master</c><00:24:33.279><c> and</c><00:24:33.520><c> slave</c>

00:24:33.909 --> 00:24:33.919 align:start position:0%
systems. The words master and slave
 

00:24:33.919 --> 00:24:35.590 align:start position:0%
systems. The words master and slave
within<00:24:34.240><c> the</c><00:24:34.400><c> two</c><00:24:34.559><c> different</c><00:24:34.880><c> subcommunities</c>

00:24:35.590 --> 00:24:35.600 align:start position:0%
within the two different subcommunities
 

00:24:35.600 --> 00:24:37.350 align:start position:0%
within the two different subcommunities
of<00:24:35.840><c> kink</c><00:24:36.159><c> and</c><00:24:36.320><c> computing</c><00:24:36.799><c> have</c><00:24:37.039><c> no</c>

00:24:37.350 --> 00:24:37.360 align:start position:0%
of kink and computing have no
 

00:24:37.360 --> 00:24:39.350 align:start position:0%
of kink and computing have no
relationship<00:24:37.919><c> to</c><00:24:38.159><c> each</c><00:24:38.320><c> other.</c><00:24:38.799><c> But</c><00:24:38.880><c> they</c><00:24:39.120><c> are</c>

00:24:39.350 --> 00:24:39.360 align:start position:0%
relationship to each other. But they are
 

00:24:39.360 --> 00:24:41.269 align:start position:0%
relationship to each other. But they are
both<00:24:39.600><c> related</c><00:24:39.919><c> to</c><00:24:40.080><c> the</c><00:24:40.240><c> larger</c><00:24:40.559><c> monocultures</c>

00:24:41.269 --> 00:24:41.279 align:start position:0%
both related to the larger monocultures
 

00:24:41.279 --> 00:24:42.789 align:start position:0%
both related to the larger monocultures
understanding<00:24:41.679><c> of</c><00:24:41.840><c> the</c><00:24:42.000><c> concepts</c><00:24:42.240><c> of</c><00:24:42.400><c> masters</c>

00:24:42.789 --> 00:24:42.799 align:start position:0%
understanding of the concepts of masters
 

00:24:42.799 --> 00:24:44.870 align:start position:0%
understanding of the concepts of masters
and<00:24:42.960><c> slaves.</c><00:24:43.520><c> Each</c><00:24:43.840><c> community</c><00:24:44.320><c> or</c><00:24:44.640><c> each</c>

00:24:44.870 --> 00:24:44.880 align:start position:0%
and slaves. Each community or each
 

00:24:44.880 --> 00:24:46.789 align:start position:0%
and slaves. Each community or each
subculture<00:24:45.440><c> within</c><00:24:45.679><c> a</c><00:24:45.840><c> society</c><00:24:46.240><c> has</c><00:24:46.400><c> its</c><00:24:46.640><c> own</c>

00:24:46.789 --> 00:24:46.799 align:start position:0%
subculture within a society has its own
 

00:24:46.799 --> 00:24:48.789 align:start position:0%
subculture within a society has its own
private<00:24:47.200><c> language</c><00:24:47.600><c> which</c><00:24:47.840><c> heavily</c><00:24:48.320><c> borrows</c>

00:24:48.789 --> 00:24:48.799 align:start position:0%
private language which heavily borrows
 

00:24:48.799 --> 00:24:50.710 align:start position:0%
private language which heavily borrows
from<00:24:49.120><c> and</c><00:24:49.440><c> alters</c><00:24:49.760><c> the</c><00:24:50.000><c> society's</c><00:24:50.559><c> main</c>

00:24:50.710 --> 00:24:50.720 align:start position:0%
from and alters the society's main
 

00:24:50.720 --> 00:24:52.470 align:start position:0%
from and alters the society's main
language.<00:24:51.279><c> And</c><00:24:51.520><c> each</c><00:24:51.679><c> of</c><00:24:51.840><c> these</c><00:24:52.080><c> private</c>

00:24:52.470 --> 00:24:52.480 align:start position:0%
language. And each of these private
 

00:24:52.480 --> 00:24:54.470 align:start position:0%
language. And each of these private
languages<00:24:53.120><c> are</c><00:24:53.360><c> valid</c><00:24:53.760><c> within</c><00:24:54.080><c> their</c><00:24:54.320><c> own</c>

00:24:54.470 --> 00:24:54.480 align:start position:0%
languages are valid within their own
 

00:24:54.480 --> 00:24:56.470 align:start position:0%
languages are valid within their own
spaces.<00:24:55.120><c> So,</c><00:24:55.360><c> for</c><00:24:55.440><c> example,</c><00:24:55.840><c> if</c><00:24:56.080><c> you</c><00:24:56.159><c> entered</c>

00:24:56.470 --> 00:24:56.480 align:start position:0%
spaces. So, for example, if you entered
 

00:24:56.480 --> 00:24:58.870 align:start position:0%
spaces. So, for example, if you entered
a<00:24:56.640><c> space</c><00:24:56.799><c> that</c><00:24:57.039><c> was</c><00:24:57.200><c> very</c><00:24:57.520><c> LGBT</c><00:24:58.320><c> and</c><00:24:58.559><c> queer</c>

00:24:58.870 --> 00:24:58.880 align:start position:0%
a space that was very LGBT and queer
 

00:24:58.880 --> 00:25:00.470 align:start position:0%
a space that was very LGBT and queer
friendly,<00:24:59.360><c> the</c><00:24:59.520><c> word</c><00:24:59.760><c> woman</c><00:25:00.000><c> within</c><00:25:00.320><c> the</c>

00:25:00.470 --> 00:25:00.480 align:start position:0%
friendly, the word woman within the
 

00:25:00.480 --> 00:25:01.909 align:start position:0%
friendly, the word woman within the
private<00:25:00.720><c> language</c><00:25:00.960><c> of</c><00:25:01.120><c> that</c><00:25:01.279><c> space</c><00:25:01.600><c> would</c>

00:25:01.909 --> 00:25:01.919 align:start position:0%
private language of that space would
 

00:25:01.919 --> 00:25:03.750 align:start position:0%
private language of that space would
absolutely<00:25:02.480><c> include</c><00:25:02.880><c> trans</c><00:25:03.200><c> women</c><00:25:03.440><c> in</c><00:25:03.600><c> its</c>

00:25:03.750 --> 00:25:03.760 align:start position:0%
absolutely include trans women in its
 

00:25:03.760 --> 00:25:05.350 align:start position:0%
absolutely include trans women in its
definition,<00:25:04.320><c> and</c><00:25:04.480><c> that</c><00:25:04.720><c> is</c><00:25:04.799><c> how</c><00:25:04.960><c> the</c><00:25:05.120><c> word</c>

00:25:05.350 --> 00:25:05.360 align:start position:0%
definition, and that is how the word
 

00:25:05.360 --> 00:25:07.590 align:start position:0%
definition, and that is how the word
would<00:25:05.520><c> be</c><00:25:05.679><c> used.</c><00:25:06.159><c> Therefore,</c><00:25:06.640><c> in</c><00:25:06.880><c> that</c><00:25:07.120><c> space,</c>

00:25:07.590 --> 00:25:07.600 align:start position:0%
would be used. Therefore, in that space,
 

00:25:07.600 --> 00:25:09.590 align:start position:0%
would be used. Therefore, in that space,
trans<00:25:07.919><c> women</c><00:25:08.240><c> are</c><00:25:08.480><c> women.</c><00:25:08.960><c> However,</c><00:25:09.279><c> if</c><00:25:09.440><c> you</c>

00:25:09.590 --> 00:25:09.600 align:start position:0%
trans women are women. However, if you
 

00:25:09.600 --> 00:25:11.110 align:start position:0%
trans women are women. However, if you
were<00:25:09.679><c> to</c><00:25:09.840><c> walk</c><00:25:09.919><c> into</c><00:25:10.159><c> a</c><00:25:10.320><c> space</c><00:25:10.480><c> that</c><00:25:10.720><c> is</c><00:25:10.880><c> very</c>

00:25:11.110 --> 00:25:11.120 align:start position:0%
were to walk into a space that is very
 

00:25:11.120 --> 00:25:13.909 align:start position:0%
were to walk into a space that is very
anti-quer<00:25:11.840><c> and</c><00:25:12.080><c> anti-LGBT,</c><00:25:13.200><c> the</c><00:25:13.360><c> word</c><00:25:13.520><c> woman</c>

00:25:13.909 --> 00:25:13.919 align:start position:0%
anti-quer and anti-LGBT, the word woman
 

00:25:13.919 --> 00:25:15.669 align:start position:0%
anti-quer and anti-LGBT, the word woman
would<00:25:14.240><c> not</c><00:25:14.400><c> include</c><00:25:14.799><c> trans</c><00:25:15.120><c> women</c><00:25:15.279><c> within</c><00:25:15.600><c> the</c>

00:25:15.669 --> 00:25:15.679 align:start position:0%
would not include trans women within the
 

00:25:15.679 --> 00:25:17.590 align:start position:0%
would not include trans women within the
private<00:25:15.919><c> language</c><00:25:16.240><c> of</c><00:25:16.400><c> that</c><00:25:16.559><c> space.</c><00:25:17.200><c> In</c><00:25:17.360><c> fact,</c>

00:25:17.590 --> 00:25:17.600 align:start position:0%
private language of that space. In fact,
 

00:25:17.600 --> 00:25:19.350 align:start position:0%
private language of that space. In fact,
the<00:25:17.840><c> word</c><00:25:18.080><c> man</c><00:25:18.480><c> probably</c><00:25:18.799><c> includes</c><00:25:19.120><c> trans</c>

00:25:19.350 --> 00:25:19.360 align:start position:0%
the word man probably includes trans
 

00:25:19.360 --> 00:25:21.110 align:start position:0%
the word man probably includes trans
women<00:25:19.520><c> in</c><00:25:19.679><c> that</c><00:25:19.840><c> space</c><00:25:20.080><c> instead.</c><00:25:20.559><c> And</c><00:25:20.799><c> because</c>

00:25:21.110 --> 00:25:21.120 align:start position:0%
women in that space instead. And because
 

00:25:21.120 --> 00:25:23.110 align:start position:0%
women in that space instead. And because
these<00:25:21.440><c> private</c><00:25:21.760><c> languages</c><00:25:22.240><c> do</c><00:25:22.480><c> use</c><00:25:22.720><c> language</c>

00:25:23.110 --> 00:25:23.120 align:start position:0%
these private languages do use language
 

00:25:23.120 --> 00:25:24.950 align:start position:0%
these private languages do use language
in<00:25:23.279><c> this</c><00:25:23.520><c> way,</c><00:25:23.840><c> both</c><00:25:24.080><c> of</c><00:25:24.240><c> these</c><00:25:24.559><c> definitions</c>

00:25:24.950 --> 00:25:24.960 align:start position:0%
in this way, both of these definitions
 

00:25:24.960 --> 00:25:26.630 align:start position:0%
in this way, both of these definitions
are<00:25:25.200><c> ultimately</c><00:25:25.600><c> valid</c><00:25:25.919><c> because</c><00:25:26.240><c> once</c><00:25:26.480><c> again,</c>

00:25:26.630 --> 00:25:26.640 align:start position:0%
are ultimately valid because once again,
 

00:25:26.640 --> 00:25:28.470 align:start position:0%
are ultimately valid because once again,
the<00:25:26.880><c> definition</c><00:25:27.200><c> of</c><00:25:27.360><c> a</c><00:25:27.520><c> word</c><00:25:27.679><c> isn't</c><00:25:28.080><c> how</c><00:25:28.159><c> it</c><00:25:28.320><c> is</c>

00:25:28.470 --> 00:25:28.480 align:start position:0%
the definition of a word isn't how it is
 

00:25:28.480 --> 00:25:30.390 align:start position:0%
the definition of a word isn't how it is
used.<00:25:29.120><c> All</c><00:25:29.279><c> of</c><00:25:29.440><c> this</c><00:25:29.600><c> means</c><00:25:30.000><c> that</c><00:25:30.159><c> we've</c>

00:25:30.390 --> 00:25:30.400 align:start position:0%
used. All of this means that we've
 

00:25:30.400 --> 00:25:32.230 align:start position:0%
used. All of this means that we've
arrived<00:25:30.559><c> at</c><00:25:30.720><c> a</c><00:25:30.960><c> very</c><00:25:31.200><c> big</c><00:25:31.440><c> problem</c><00:25:31.679><c> for</c><00:25:32.000><c> trans</c>

00:25:32.230 --> 00:25:32.240 align:start position:0%
arrived at a very big problem for trans
 

00:25:32.240 --> 00:25:33.430 align:start position:0%
arrived at a very big problem for trans
activists.<00:25:32.960><c> The</c><00:25:33.120><c> problem</c><00:25:33.279><c> with</c>

00:25:33.430 --> 00:25:33.440 align:start position:0%
activists. The problem with
 

00:25:33.440 --> 00:25:35.110 align:start position:0%
activists. The problem with
Vickenstein's<00:25:34.080><c> view</c><00:25:34.240><c> is</c><00:25:34.480><c> that</c><00:25:34.640><c> in</c><00:25:34.880><c> some</c>

00:25:35.110 --> 00:25:35.120 align:start position:0%
Vickenstein's view is that in some
 

00:25:35.120 --> 00:25:37.190 align:start position:0%
Vickenstein's view is that in some
spaces,<00:25:35.679><c> trans</c><00:25:36.000><c> women</c><00:25:36.320><c> are</c><00:25:36.480><c> definitionally</c>

00:25:37.190 --> 00:25:37.200 align:start position:0%
spaces, trans women are definitionally
 

00:25:37.200 --> 00:25:39.110 align:start position:0%
spaces, trans women are definitionally
not<00:25:37.600><c> woman</c><00:25:38.000><c> because</c><00:25:38.240><c> that</c><00:25:38.480><c> is</c><00:25:38.559><c> how</c><00:25:38.720><c> the</c><00:25:38.880><c> word</c>

00:25:39.110 --> 00:25:39.120 align:start position:0%
not woman because that is how the word
 

00:25:39.120 --> 00:25:41.110 align:start position:0%
not woman because that is how the word
woman<00:25:39.360><c> is</c><00:25:39.600><c> used</c><00:25:39.919><c> in</c><00:25:40.159><c> that</c><00:25:40.400><c> space,</c><00:25:40.799><c> which</c>

00:25:41.110 --> 00:25:41.120 align:start position:0%
woman is used in that space, which
 

00:25:41.120 --> 00:25:43.190 align:start position:0%
woman is used in that space, which
transactivists<00:25:41.840><c> just</c><00:25:42.080><c> cannot</c><00:25:42.400><c> accept.</c><00:25:42.960><c> For</c>

00:25:43.190 --> 00:25:43.200 align:start position:0%
transactivists just cannot accept. For
 

00:25:43.200 --> 00:25:45.350 align:start position:0%
transactivists just cannot accept. For
them,<00:25:43.600><c> in</c><00:25:43.840><c> their</c><00:25:44.080><c> view,</c><00:25:44.400><c> for</c><00:25:44.640><c> moral</c><00:25:44.960><c> reasons,</c>

00:25:45.350 --> 00:25:45.360 align:start position:0%
them, in their view, for moral reasons,
 

00:25:45.360 --> 00:25:47.110 align:start position:0%
them, in their view, for moral reasons,
the<00:25:45.520><c> word</c><00:25:45.760><c> woman</c><00:25:46.080><c> must</c><00:25:46.240><c> be</c><00:25:46.400><c> used</c><00:25:46.559><c> the</c><00:25:46.720><c> way</c><00:25:46.880><c> they</c>

00:25:47.110 --> 00:25:47.120 align:start position:0%
the word woman must be used the way they
 

00:25:47.120 --> 00:25:48.789 align:start position:0%
the word woman must be used the way they
want<00:25:47.200><c> it</c><00:25:47.360><c> to</c><00:25:47.440><c> be</c><00:25:47.600><c> used</c><00:25:47.840><c> in</c><00:25:48.159><c> every</c><00:25:48.480><c> single</c>

00:25:48.789 --> 00:25:48.799 align:start position:0%
want it to be used in every single
 

00:25:48.799 --> 00:25:50.950 align:start position:0%
want it to be used in every single
space.<00:25:49.440><c> However,</c><00:25:49.840><c> the</c><00:25:50.000><c> problem</c><00:25:50.159><c> with</c><00:25:50.400><c> Daredus</c>

00:25:50.950 --> 00:25:50.960 align:start position:0%
space. However, the problem with Daredus
 

00:25:50.960 --> 00:25:52.470 align:start position:0%
space. However, the problem with Daredus
view<00:25:51.200><c> is</c><00:25:51.360><c> that</c><00:25:51.520><c> no</c><00:25:51.600><c> matter</c><00:25:51.919><c> what</c><00:25:52.159><c> definition</c>

00:25:52.470 --> 00:25:52.480 align:start position:0%
view is that no matter what definition
 

00:25:52.480 --> 00:25:54.390 align:start position:0%
view is that no matter what definition
of<00:25:52.640><c> women</c><00:25:52.880><c> you</c><00:25:53.039><c> use,</c><00:25:53.440><c> some</c><00:25:53.679><c> people</c><00:25:53.840><c> who</c><00:25:54.159><c> might</c>

00:25:54.390 --> 00:25:54.400 align:start position:0%
of women you use, some people who might
 

00:25:54.400 --> 00:25:56.230 align:start position:0%
of women you use, some people who might
want<00:25:54.559><c> to</c><00:25:54.799><c> call</c><00:25:54.960><c> themselves</c><00:25:55.520><c> women,</c><00:25:56.080><c> will</c>

00:25:56.230 --> 00:25:56.240 align:start position:0%
want to call themselves women, will
 

00:25:56.240 --> 00:25:58.070 align:start position:0%
want to call themselves women, will
eventually<00:25:56.720><c> be</c><00:25:56.880><c> excluded</c><00:25:57.440><c> because</c><00:25:57.760><c> having</c>

00:25:58.070 --> 00:25:58.080 align:start position:0%
eventually be excluded because having
 

00:25:58.080 --> 00:26:00.149 align:start position:0%
eventually be excluded because having
any<00:25:58.400><c> standards</c><00:25:58.799><c> at</c><00:25:58.960><c> all,</c><00:25:59.200><c> even</c><00:25:59.360><c> the</c><00:25:59.520><c> most</c><00:25:59.760><c> lack</c>

00:26:00.149 --> 00:26:00.159 align:start position:0%
any standards at all, even the most lack
 

00:26:00.159 --> 00:26:01.830 align:start position:0%
any standards at all, even the most lack
standards,<00:26:00.720><c> naturally</c><00:26:01.200><c> includes</c><00:26:01.600><c> the</c>

00:26:01.830 --> 00:26:01.840 align:start position:0%
standards, naturally includes the
 

00:26:01.840 --> 00:26:03.510 align:start position:0%
standards, naturally includes the
possibility<00:26:02.320><c> that</c><00:26:02.559><c> somebody</c><00:26:02.880><c> might</c><00:26:03.120><c> fail</c><00:26:03.360><c> to</c>

00:26:03.510 --> 00:26:03.520 align:start position:0%
possibility that somebody might fail to
 

00:26:03.520 --> 00:26:05.350 align:start position:0%
possibility that somebody might fail to
live<00:26:03.679><c> up</c><00:26:03.840><c> to</c><00:26:03.919><c> them.</c><00:26:04.159><c> And</c><00:26:04.400><c> having</c><00:26:04.720><c> no</c><00:26:04.960><c> standards</c>

00:26:05.350 --> 00:26:05.360 align:start position:0%
live up to them. And having no standards
 

00:26:05.360 --> 00:26:06.950 align:start position:0%
live up to them. And having no standards
at<00:26:05.520><c> all,</c><00:26:05.760><c> means</c><00:26:06.000><c> the</c><00:26:06.159><c> word</c><00:26:06.320><c> woman</c><00:26:06.640><c> becomes</c>

00:26:06.950 --> 00:26:06.960 align:start position:0%
at all, means the word woman becomes
 

00:26:06.960 --> 00:26:08.630 align:start position:0%
at all, means the word woman becomes
meaningless.<00:26:07.600><c> You</c><00:26:07.919><c> basically</c><00:26:08.320><c> have</c><00:26:08.480><c> to</c>

00:26:08.630 --> 00:26:08.640 align:start position:0%
meaningless. You basically have to
 

00:26:08.640 --> 00:26:10.390 align:start position:0%
meaningless. You basically have to
choose<00:26:08.880><c> between</c><00:26:09.200><c> having</c><00:26:09.440><c> some</c><00:26:09.760><c> gatekeeping,</c>

00:26:10.390 --> 00:26:10.400 align:start position:0%
choose between having some gatekeeping,
 

00:26:10.400 --> 00:26:12.149 align:start position:0%
choose between having some gatekeeping,
which<00:26:10.640><c> means</c><00:26:10.880><c> excluding</c><00:26:11.360><c> some</c><00:26:11.679><c> people,</c><00:26:11.919><c> even</c>

00:26:12.149 --> 00:26:12.159 align:start position:0%
which means excluding some people, even
 

00:26:12.159 --> 00:26:14.310 align:start position:0%
which means excluding some people, even
if<00:26:12.320><c> extremely</c><00:26:12.720><c> small,</c><00:26:13.200><c> or</c><00:26:13.440><c> you</c><00:26:13.679><c> have</c><00:26:13.840><c> to</c><00:26:14.000><c> allow</c>

00:26:14.310 --> 00:26:14.320 align:start position:0%
if extremely small, or you have to allow
 

00:26:14.320 --> 00:26:15.510 align:start position:0%
if extremely small, or you have to allow
other<00:26:14.559><c> people</c><00:26:14.720><c> to</c><00:26:14.880><c> define</c><00:26:15.200><c> the</c><00:26:15.360><c> word</c>

00:26:15.510 --> 00:26:15.520 align:start position:0%
other people to define the word
 

00:26:15.520 --> 00:26:17.269 align:start position:0%
other people to define the word
differently<00:26:15.840><c> than</c><00:26:16.000><c> you</c><00:26:16.159><c> do</c><00:26:16.400><c> within</c><00:26:16.799><c> their</c><00:26:17.039><c> own</c>

00:26:17.269 --> 00:26:17.279 align:start position:0%
differently than you do within their own
 

00:26:17.279 --> 00:26:19.269 align:start position:0%
differently than you do within their own
communities<00:26:17.919><c> and</c><00:26:18.080><c> accept</c><00:26:18.320><c> that</c><00:26:18.559><c> it</c><00:26:18.720><c> is</c><00:26:18.880><c> valid</c>

00:26:19.269 --> 00:26:19.279 align:start position:0%
communities and accept that it is valid
 

00:26:19.279 --> 00:26:21.510 align:start position:0%
communities and accept that it is valid
within<00:26:19.679><c> their</c><00:26:20.000><c> own</c><00:26:20.240><c> contexts.</c><00:26:20.960><c> The</c><00:26:21.120><c> radicals</c>

00:26:21.510 --> 00:26:21.520 align:start position:0%
within their own contexts. The radicals
 

00:26:21.520 --> 00:26:23.430 align:start position:0%
within their own contexts. The radicals
in<00:26:21.679><c> the</c><00:26:21.760><c> transactivism</c><00:26:22.480><c> camp</c><00:26:22.880><c> simply</c><00:26:23.279><c> want</c>

00:26:23.430 --> 00:26:23.440 align:start position:0%
in the transactivism camp simply want
 

00:26:23.440 --> 00:26:25.350 align:start position:0%
in the transactivism camp simply want
the<00:26:23.679><c> best</c><00:26:23.919><c> of</c><00:26:24.080><c> both</c><00:26:24.320><c> of</c><00:26:24.400><c> these</c><00:26:24.640><c> things,</c><00:26:25.120><c> even</c>

00:26:25.350 --> 00:26:25.360 align:start position:0%
the best of both of these things, even
 

00:26:25.360 --> 00:26:27.029 align:start position:0%
the best of both of these things, even
though<00:26:25.440><c> that</c><00:26:25.679><c> makes</c><00:26:25.919><c> no</c><00:26:26.080><c> sense</c><00:26:26.320><c> whatsoever.</c>

00:26:27.029 --> 00:26:27.039 align:start position:0%
though that makes no sense whatsoever.
 

00:26:27.039 --> 00:26:28.549 align:start position:0%
though that makes no sense whatsoever.
They<00:26:27.200><c> want</c><00:26:27.360><c> an</c><00:26:27.600><c> objective</c><00:26:28.000><c> definition</c><00:26:28.320><c> of</c><00:26:28.480><c> the</c>

00:26:28.549 --> 00:26:28.559 align:start position:0%
They want an objective definition of the
 

00:26:28.559 --> 00:26:30.470 align:start position:0%
They want an objective definition of the
word<00:26:28.799><c> woman,</c><00:26:29.200><c> therefore,</c><00:26:29.600><c> everyone</c><00:26:30.000><c> must</c><00:26:30.240><c> use</c>

00:26:30.470 --> 00:26:30.480 align:start position:0%
word woman, therefore, everyone must use
 

00:26:30.480 --> 00:26:31.830 align:start position:0%
word woman, therefore, everyone must use
it.<00:26:30.799><c> But</c><00:26:30.880><c> they</c><00:26:31.039><c> also</c><00:26:31.279><c> want</c><00:26:31.440><c> it</c><00:26:31.600><c> to</c><00:26:31.679><c> be</c>

00:26:31.830 --> 00:26:31.840 align:start position:0%
it. But they also want it to be
 

00:26:31.840 --> 00:26:33.510 align:start position:0%
it. But they also want it to be
subjective<00:26:32.240><c> enough</c><00:26:32.480><c> that</c><00:26:32.799><c> anyone</c><00:26:33.120><c> can</c><00:26:33.279><c> join</c>

00:26:33.510 --> 00:26:33.520 align:start position:0%
subjective enough that anyone can join
 

00:26:33.520 --> 00:26:35.750 align:start position:0%
subjective enough that anyone can join
it<00:26:33.679><c> on</c><00:26:33.760><c> a</c><00:26:33.919><c> whim.</c><00:26:34.400><c> These</c><00:26:34.720><c> two</c><00:26:34.960><c> demands</c><00:26:35.440><c> are</c>

00:26:35.750 --> 00:26:35.760 align:start position:0%
it on a whim. These two demands are
 

00:26:35.760 --> 00:26:37.590 align:start position:0%
it on a whim. These two demands are
ultimately<00:26:36.080><c> irreconcilable,</c><00:26:36.960><c> which</c><00:26:37.200><c> is</c><00:26:37.279><c> why</c>

00:26:37.590 --> 00:26:37.600 align:start position:0%
ultimately irreconcilable, which is why
 

00:26:37.600 --> 00:26:39.029 align:start position:0%
ultimately irreconcilable, which is why
trans<00:26:37.840><c> activists</c><00:26:38.240><c> are</c><00:26:38.400><c> fighting</c><00:26:38.559><c> a</c><00:26:38.799><c> battle</c>

00:26:39.029 --> 00:26:39.039 align:start position:0%
trans activists are fighting a battle
 

00:26:39.039 --> 00:26:41.190 align:start position:0%
trans activists are fighting a battle
they<00:26:39.279><c> can't</c><00:26:39.520><c> actually</c><00:26:39.840><c> win.</c><00:26:40.320><c> By</c><00:26:40.480><c> the</c><00:26:40.640><c> way,</c><00:26:40.960><c> I</c>

00:26:41.190 --> 00:26:41.200 align:start position:0%
they can't actually win. By the way, I
 

00:26:41.200 --> 00:26:42.789 align:start position:0%
they can't actually win. By the way, I
don't<00:26:41.440><c> actually</c><00:26:41.760><c> think</c><00:26:42.000><c> Nara</c><00:26:42.480><c> is</c><00:26:42.640><c> smart</c>

00:26:42.789 --> 00:26:42.799 align:start position:0%
don't actually think Nara is smart
 

00:26:42.799 --> 00:26:44.390 align:start position:0%
don't actually think Nara is smart
enough<00:26:42.960><c> to</c><00:26:43.120><c> know</c><00:26:43.279><c> she's</c><00:26:43.520><c> doing</c><00:26:43.600><c> all</c><00:26:43.840><c> this.</c><00:26:44.159><c> I</c>

00:26:44.390 --> 00:26:44.400 align:start position:0%
enough to know she's doing all this. I
 

00:26:44.400 --> 00:26:45.590 align:start position:0%
enough to know she's doing all this. I
don't<00:26:44.480><c> think</c><00:26:44.559><c> she's</c><00:26:44.799><c> read</c><00:26:45.039><c> Dereda</c><00:26:45.440><c> or</c>

00:26:45.590 --> 00:26:45.600 align:start position:0%
don't think she's read Dereda or
 

00:26:45.600 --> 00:26:47.110 align:start position:0%
don't think she's read Dereda or
Vickenstein.<00:26:46.320><c> This</c><00:26:46.480><c> is</c><00:26:46.559><c> just</c><00:26:46.720><c> the</c><00:26:46.880><c> natural</c>

00:26:47.110 --> 00:26:47.120 align:start position:0%
Vickenstein. This is just the natural
 

00:26:47.120 --> 00:26:48.950 align:start position:0%
Vickenstein. This is just the natural
end<00:26:47.360><c> result</c><00:26:47.520><c> of</c><00:26:47.600><c> her</c><00:26:47.840><c> logic.</c><00:26:48.320><c> But</c><00:26:48.480><c> let's</c><00:26:48.720><c> shift</c>

00:26:48.950 --> 00:26:48.960 align:start position:0%
end result of her logic. But let's shift
 

00:26:48.960 --> 00:26:50.549 align:start position:0%
end result of her logic. But let's shift
gears<00:26:49.279><c> for</c><00:26:49.440><c> a</c><00:26:49.600><c> minute</c><00:26:49.760><c> and</c><00:26:50.000><c> look</c><00:26:50.080><c> at</c><00:26:50.240><c> the</c><00:26:50.400><c> other</c>

00:26:50.549 --> 00:26:50.559 align:start position:0%
gears for a minute and look at the other
 

00:26:50.559 --> 00:26:52.149 align:start position:0%
gears for a minute and look at the other
side<00:26:50.720><c> of</c><00:26:50.799><c> the</c><00:26:50.960><c> aisle.</c><00:26:51.440><c> Probably</c><00:26:51.679><c> the</c><00:26:51.919><c> most</c>

00:26:52.149 --> 00:26:52.159 align:start position:0%
side of the aisle. Probably the most
 

00:26:52.159 --> 00:26:53.909 align:start position:0%
side of the aisle. Probably the most
high-profile<00:26:52.880><c> person</c><00:26:53.120><c> to</c><00:26:53.360><c> jump</c><00:26:53.520><c> onto</c><00:26:53.760><c> the</c>

00:26:53.909 --> 00:26:53.919 align:start position:0%
high-profile person to jump onto the
 

00:26:53.919 --> 00:26:54.950 align:start position:0%
high-profile person to jump onto the
other<00:26:54.000><c> side</c><00:26:54.159><c> of</c><00:26:54.240><c> the</c><00:26:54.400><c> conversation</c><00:26:54.720><c> was</c>

00:26:54.950 --> 00:26:54.960 align:start position:0%
other side of the conversation was
 

00:26:54.960 --> 00:26:56.549 align:start position:0%
other side of the conversation was
Sargon,<00:26:55.520><c> who</c><00:26:55.679><c> made</c><00:26:55.760><c> a</c><00:26:55.919><c> video</c><00:26:56.159><c> covering</c><00:26:56.400><c> the</c>

00:26:56.549 --> 00:26:56.559 align:start position:0%
Sargon, who made a video covering the
 

00:26:56.559 --> 00:26:57.909 align:start position:0%
Sargon, who made a video covering the
whole<00:26:56.720><c> thing.</c><00:26:56.960><c> And</c><00:26:57.039><c> to</c><00:26:57.279><c> his</c><00:26:57.360><c> credit,</c><00:26:57.679><c> he</c><00:26:57.840><c> is</c>

00:26:57.909 --> 00:26:57.919 align:start position:0%
whole thing. And to his credit, he is
 

00:26:57.919 --> 00:27:00.710 align:start position:0%
whole thing. And to his credit, he is
smarter<00:26:58.159><c> than</c><00:26:58.320><c> Yara.</c><00:26:59.120><c> Let's</c><00:26:59.840><c> have</c><00:27:00.080><c> some</c><00:27:00.400><c> fun</c>

00:27:00.710 --> 00:27:00.720 align:start position:0%
smarter than Yara. Let's have some fun
 

00:27:00.720 --> 00:27:03.029 align:start position:0%
smarter than Yara. Let's have some fun
of<00:27:00.960><c> our</c><00:27:01.200><c> own</c><00:27:01.600><c> with</c><00:27:02.080><c> an</c><00:27:02.320><c> old</c><00:27:02.559><c> friend</c><00:27:02.720><c> of</c><00:27:02.799><c> ours</c>

00:27:03.029 --> 00:27:03.039 align:start position:0%
of our own with an old friend of ours
 

00:27:03.039 --> 00:27:05.350 align:start position:0%
of our own with an old friend of ours
called<00:27:03.440><c> Short</c><00:27:03.760><c> Fat</c><00:27:04.080><c> Otaku,</c><00:27:04.799><c> otherwise</c><00:27:05.120><c> known</c>

00:27:05.350 --> 00:27:05.360 align:start position:0%
called Short Fat Otaku, otherwise known
 

00:27:05.360 --> 00:27:09.590 align:start position:0%
called Short Fat Otaku, otherwise known
as<00:27:05.760><c> Dev.</c><00:27:06.880><c> And</c><00:27:07.120><c> Dev</c><00:27:07.679><c> has</c><00:27:07.919><c> spent</c><00:27:08.320><c> the</c><00:27:08.640><c> last</c><00:27:09.279><c> many</c>

00:27:09.590 --> 00:27:09.600 align:start position:0%
as Dev. And Dev has spent the last many
 

00:27:09.600 --> 00:27:11.190 align:start position:0%
as Dev. And Dev has spent the last many
years

00:27:11.190 --> 00:27:11.200 align:start position:0%
years
 

00:27:11.200 --> 00:27:13.110 align:start position:0%
years
accepting<00:27:11.919><c> that</c><00:27:12.159><c> there</c><00:27:12.400><c> are</c><00:27:12.559><c> massive</c>

00:27:13.110 --> 00:27:13.120 align:start position:0%
accepting that there are massive
 

00:27:13.120 --> 00:27:15.990 align:start position:0%
accepting that there are massive
problems<00:27:13.679><c> with</c><00:27:14.159><c> liberal</c><00:27:14.640><c> politics.</c><00:27:15.360><c> And</c><00:27:15.760><c> when</c>

00:27:15.990 --> 00:27:16.000 align:start position:0%
problems with liberal politics. And when
 

00:27:16.000 --> 00:27:18.470 align:start position:0%
problems with liberal politics. And when
I<00:27:16.080><c> say</c><00:27:16.320><c> liberal</c><00:27:16.720><c> politics,</c><00:27:17.600><c> I</c><00:27:17.760><c> am</c><00:27:17.919><c> including</c>

00:27:18.470 --> 00:27:18.480 align:start position:0%
I say liberal politics, I am including
 

00:27:18.480 --> 00:27:20.470 align:start position:0%
I say liberal politics, I am including
basically<00:27:19.279><c> everything</c><00:27:19.760><c> that</c><00:27:20.080><c> is</c><00:27:20.240><c> an</c>

00:27:20.470 --> 00:27:20.480 align:start position:0%
basically everything that is an
 

00:27:20.480 --> 00:27:23.430 align:start position:0%
basically everything that is an
extension<00:27:21.600><c> of</c><00:27:22.080><c> well,</c><00:27:22.320><c> I</c><00:27:22.559><c> mean,</c><00:27:22.960><c> John</c><00:27:23.200><c> Lock</c>

00:27:23.430 --> 00:27:23.440 align:start position:0%
extension of well, I mean, John Lock
 

00:27:23.440 --> 00:27:25.350 align:start position:0%
extension of well, I mean, John Lock
onwards,<00:27:23.919><c> I</c><00:27:24.080><c> think,</c><00:27:24.159><c> is</c><00:27:24.320><c> fair</c><00:27:24.559><c> to</c><00:27:24.720><c> say.</c><00:27:25.039><c> As</c><00:27:25.200><c> I'm</c>

00:27:25.350 --> 00:27:25.360 align:start position:0%
onwards, I think, is fair to say. As I'm
 

00:27:25.360 --> 00:27:27.029 align:start position:0%
onwards, I think, is fair to say. As I'm
sure<00:27:25.520><c> you</c><00:27:25.760><c> know</c><00:27:25.919><c> by</c><00:27:26.159><c> now,</c><00:27:26.400><c> I</c><00:27:26.640><c> think</c><00:27:26.720><c> that</c>

00:27:27.029 --> 00:27:27.039 align:start position:0%
sure you know by now, I think that
 

00:27:27.039 --> 00:27:29.909 align:start position:0%
sure you know by now, I think that
everything<00:27:27.440><c> from</c><00:27:27.760><c> liberalism</c><00:27:28.480><c> onwards</c><00:27:29.600><c> is</c>

00:27:29.909 --> 00:27:29.919 align:start position:0%
everything from liberalism onwards is
 

00:27:29.919 --> 00:27:32.070 align:start position:0%
everything from liberalism onwards is
all<00:27:30.159><c> a</c><00:27:30.320><c> part</c><00:27:30.480><c> of</c><00:27:30.640><c> the</c><00:27:30.880><c> same</c><00:27:31.120><c> plan,</c><00:27:31.520><c> has</c><00:27:31.760><c> the</c>

00:27:32.070 --> 00:27:32.080 align:start position:0%
all a part of the same plan, has the
 

00:27:32.080 --> 00:27:33.830 align:start position:0%
all a part of the same plan, has the
same<00:27:32.240><c> philosophy,</c><00:27:32.880><c> the</c><00:27:33.039><c> same</c><00:27:33.200><c> metaphysics,</c>

00:27:33.830 --> 00:27:33.840 align:start position:0%
same philosophy, the same metaphysics,
 

00:27:33.840 --> 00:27:36.470 align:start position:0%
same philosophy, the same metaphysics,
the<00:27:34.000><c> same</c><00:27:34.240><c> tilos.</c><00:27:35.440><c> It's</c><00:27:35.760><c> trying</c><00:27:36.000><c> to</c><00:27:36.159><c> get</c><00:27:36.320><c> to</c>

00:27:36.470 --> 00:27:36.480 align:start position:0%
the same tilos. It's trying to get to
 

00:27:36.480 --> 00:27:39.830 align:start position:0%
the same tilos. It's trying to get to
the<00:27:36.720><c> same</c><00:27:36.960><c> place,</c><00:27:38.400><c> but</c><00:27:38.640><c> doesn't</c><00:27:39.039><c> succeed.</c>

00:27:39.830 --> 00:27:39.840 align:start position:0%
the same place, but doesn't succeed.
 

00:27:39.840 --> 00:27:41.909 align:start position:0%
the same place, but doesn't succeed.
Sargon's<00:27:40.320><c> view</c><00:27:40.640><c> nowadays</c><00:27:41.039><c> is</c><00:27:41.360><c> basically</c><00:27:41.760><c> that</c>

00:27:41.909 --> 00:27:41.919 align:start position:0%
Sargon's view nowadays is basically that
 

00:27:41.919 --> 00:27:43.350 align:start position:0%
Sargon's view nowadays is basically that
liberalism<00:27:42.480><c> inevitably</c><00:27:42.960><c> turns</c><00:27:43.200><c> into</c>

00:27:43.350 --> 00:27:43.360 align:start position:0%
liberalism inevitably turns into
 

00:27:43.360 --> 00:27:44.950 align:start position:0%
liberalism inevitably turns into
socialism<00:27:43.840><c> and</c><00:27:44.000><c> then</c><00:27:44.240><c> communism</c><00:27:44.720><c> because</c>

00:27:44.950 --> 00:27:44.960 align:start position:0%
socialism and then communism because
 

00:27:44.960 --> 00:27:46.630 align:start position:0%
socialism and then communism because
liberals<00:27:45.440><c> value</c><00:27:45.760><c> the</c><00:27:46.000><c> same</c><00:27:46.159><c> thing</c><00:27:46.320><c> as</c><00:27:46.480><c> the</c>

00:27:46.630 --> 00:27:46.640 align:start position:0%
liberals value the same thing as the
 

00:27:46.640 --> 00:27:48.390 align:start position:0%
liberals value the same thing as the
socialists<00:27:46.960><c> and</c><00:27:47.120><c> communists.</c><00:27:47.760><c> And</c><00:27:47.919><c> on</c><00:27:48.159><c> paper,</c>

00:27:48.390 --> 00:27:48.400 align:start position:0%
socialists and communists. And on paper,
 

00:27:48.400 --> 00:27:50.070 align:start position:0%
socialists and communists. And on paper,
the<00:27:48.640><c> socialists</c><00:27:48.960><c> and</c><00:27:49.120><c> communists</c><00:27:49.760><c> simply</c>

00:27:50.070 --> 00:27:50.080 align:start position:0%
the socialists and communists simply
 

00:27:50.080 --> 00:27:51.510 align:start position:0%
the socialists and communists simply
have<00:27:50.159><c> a</c><00:27:50.400><c> stronger</c><00:27:50.799><c> preference</c><00:27:51.120><c> for</c><00:27:51.360><c> those</c>

00:27:51.510 --> 00:27:51.520 align:start position:0%
have a stronger preference for those
 

00:27:51.520 --> 00:27:53.830 align:start position:0%
have a stronger preference for those
values.<00:27:52.080><c> and</c><00:27:52.320><c> therefore</c><00:27:52.880><c> every</c><00:27:53.200><c> liberal</c><00:27:53.600><c> will</c>

00:27:53.830 --> 00:27:53.840 align:start position:0%
values. and therefore every liberal will
 

00:27:53.840 --> 00:27:55.510 align:start position:0%
values. and therefore every liberal will
inevitably<00:27:54.320><c> either</c><00:27:54.640><c> stop</c><00:27:54.880><c> being</c><00:27:55.120><c> a</c><00:27:55.279><c> liberal</c>

00:27:55.510 --> 00:27:55.520 align:start position:0%
inevitably either stop being a liberal
 

00:27:55.520 --> 00:27:57.350 align:start position:0%
inevitably either stop being a liberal
or<00:27:55.760><c> they</c><00:27:55.919><c> will</c><00:27:56.000><c> move</c><00:27:56.159><c> leftward</c><00:27:56.559><c> over</c><00:27:56.799><c> time.</c><00:27:57.200><c> In</c>

00:27:57.350 --> 00:27:57.360 align:start position:0%
or they will move leftward over time. In
 

00:27:57.360 --> 00:27:59.269 align:start position:0%
or they will move leftward over time. In
other<00:27:57.520><c> words,</c><00:27:57.840><c> Sargon's</c><00:27:58.480><c> position</c><00:27:58.799><c> is</c><00:27:59.039><c> that</c>

00:27:59.269 --> 00:27:59.279 align:start position:0%
other words, Sargon's position is that
 

00:27:59.279 --> 00:28:01.110 align:start position:0%
other words, Sargon's position is that
Marx's<00:27:59.840><c> observed</c><00:28:00.480><c> contradictions</c><00:28:00.960><c> of</c>

00:28:01.110 --> 00:28:01.120 align:start position:0%
Marx's observed contradictions of
 

00:28:01.120 --> 00:28:02.789 align:start position:0%
Marx's observed contradictions of
liberalism<00:28:01.679><c> are</c><00:28:02.000><c> correct.</c><00:28:02.399><c> That</c><00:28:02.640><c> the</c>

00:28:02.789 --> 00:28:02.799 align:start position:0%
liberalism are correct. That the
 

00:28:02.799 --> 00:28:04.230 align:start position:0%
liberalism are correct. That the
political<00:28:03.200><c> position</c><00:28:03.440><c> of</c><00:28:03.679><c> liberal</c><00:28:04.080><c> is</c>

00:28:04.230 --> 00:28:04.240 align:start position:0%
political position of liberal is
 

00:28:04.240 --> 00:28:05.990 align:start position:0%
political position of liberal is
fundamentally<00:28:04.799><c> unstable</c><00:28:05.279><c> and</c><00:28:05.520><c> that</c><00:28:05.679><c> given</c>

00:28:05.990 --> 00:28:06.000 align:start position:0%
fundamentally unstable and that given
 

00:28:06.000 --> 00:28:07.909 align:start position:0%
fundamentally unstable and that given
enough<00:28:06.320><c> time,</c><00:28:06.720><c> everyone</c><00:28:07.120><c> must</c><00:28:07.440><c> eventually</c>

00:28:07.909 --> 00:28:07.919 align:start position:0%
enough time, everyone must eventually
 

00:28:07.919 --> 00:28:09.909 align:start position:0%
enough time, everyone must eventually
move<00:28:08.159><c> either</c><00:28:08.559><c> leftward</c><00:28:08.960><c> or</c><00:28:09.200><c> rightward</c><00:28:09.600><c> off</c><00:28:09.840><c> of</c>

00:28:09.909 --> 00:28:09.919 align:start position:0%
move either leftward or rightward off of
 

00:28:09.919 --> 00:28:11.510 align:start position:0%
move either leftward or rightward off of
it.<00:28:10.240><c> I've</c><00:28:10.480><c> discussed</c><00:28:10.799><c> this</c><00:28:10.960><c> idea</c><00:28:11.200><c> in</c><00:28:11.360><c> a</c>

00:28:11.510 --> 00:28:11.520 align:start position:0%
it. I've discussed this idea in a
 

00:28:11.520 --> 00:28:12.950 align:start position:0%
it. I've discussed this idea in a
previous<00:28:11.760><c> video</c><00:28:12.000><c> already,</c><00:28:12.320><c> and</c><00:28:12.559><c> while</c><00:28:12.720><c> I</c>

00:28:12.950 --> 00:28:12.960 align:start position:0%
previous video already, and while I
 

00:28:12.960 --> 00:28:14.789 align:start position:0%
previous video already, and while I
don't<00:28:13.120><c> agree</c><00:28:13.360><c> with</c><00:28:13.520><c> it,</c><00:28:13.840><c> it</c><00:28:14.000><c> is</c><00:28:14.159><c> not</c><00:28:14.399><c> entirely</c>

00:28:14.789 --> 00:28:14.799 align:start position:0%
don't agree with it, it is not entirely
 

00:28:14.799 --> 00:28:16.870 align:start position:0%
don't agree with it, it is not entirely
without<00:28:15.120><c> merit.</c><00:28:15.679><c> For</c><00:28:15.760><c> example,</c><00:28:16.159><c> this</c><00:28:16.320><c> 2016</c>

00:28:16.870 --> 00:28:16.880 align:start position:0%
without merit. For example, this 2016
 

00:28:16.880 --> 00:28:18.230 align:start position:0%
without merit. For example, this 2016
Jacobin<00:28:17.360><c> article,</c><00:28:17.600><c> which</c><00:28:17.760><c> we've</c><00:28:18.000><c> looked</c><00:28:18.080><c> at</c>

00:28:18.230 --> 00:28:18.240 align:start position:0%
Jacobin article, which we've looked at
 

00:28:18.240 --> 00:28:19.909 align:start position:0%
Jacobin article, which we've looked at
several<00:28:18.480><c> times</c><00:28:18.640><c> before</c><00:28:18.960><c> now,</c><00:28:19.279><c> makes</c><00:28:19.600><c> exactly</c>

00:28:19.909 --> 00:28:19.919 align:start position:0%
several times before now, makes exactly
 

00:28:19.919 --> 00:28:21.750 align:start position:0%
several times before now, makes exactly
this<00:28:20.159><c> claim</c><00:28:20.480><c> that</c><00:28:20.720><c> liberals</c><00:28:21.120><c> and</c><00:28:21.279><c> socialists</c>

00:28:21.750 --> 00:28:21.760 align:start position:0%
this claim that liberals and socialists
 

00:28:21.760 --> 00:28:23.190 align:start position:0%
this claim that liberals and socialists
value<00:28:22.000><c> the</c><00:28:22.159><c> same</c><00:28:22.320><c> thing,</c><00:28:22.720><c> freedom</c><00:28:22.960><c> and</c>

00:28:23.190 --> 00:28:23.200 align:start position:0%
value the same thing, freedom and
 

00:28:23.200 --> 00:28:25.110 align:start position:0%
value the same thing, freedom and
equality.<00:28:23.679><c> But</c><00:28:23.840><c> liberalism</c><00:28:24.399><c> cannot</c><00:28:24.799><c> actually</c>

00:28:25.110 --> 00:28:25.120 align:start position:0%
equality. But liberalism cannot actually
 

00:28:25.120 --> 00:28:26.710 align:start position:0%
equality. But liberalism cannot actually
provide<00:28:25.520><c> people</c><00:28:25.760><c> with</c><00:28:26.000><c> more</c><00:28:26.320><c> freedom</c><00:28:26.559><c> and</c>

00:28:26.710 --> 00:28:26.720 align:start position:0%
provide people with more freedom and
 

00:28:26.720 --> 00:28:28.549 align:start position:0%
provide people with more freedom and
equality<00:28:27.039><c> than</c><00:28:27.279><c> socialism</c><00:28:27.679><c> can.</c><00:28:28.080><c> Markx</c>

00:28:28.549 --> 00:28:28.559 align:start position:0%
equality than socialism can. Markx
 

00:28:28.559 --> 00:28:30.470 align:start position:0%
equality than socialism can. Markx
observed<00:28:28.960><c> the</c><00:28:29.120><c> liberal</c><00:28:29.520><c> revolution</c><00:28:30.159><c> only</c>

00:28:30.470 --> 00:28:30.480 align:start position:0%
observed the liberal revolution only
 

00:28:30.480 --> 00:28:32.310 align:start position:0%
observed the liberal revolution only
gave<00:28:30.720><c> freedom</c><00:28:30.960><c> to</c><00:28:31.039><c> the</c><00:28:31.200><c> bourgeoisi</c><00:28:32.000><c> from</c><00:28:32.159><c> the</c>

00:28:32.310 --> 00:28:32.320 align:start position:0%
gave freedom to the bourgeoisi from the
 

00:28:32.320 --> 00:28:34.470 align:start position:0%
gave freedom to the bourgeoisi from the
old<00:28:32.480><c> aristocracy.</c><00:28:33.440><c> It</c><00:28:33.600><c> did</c><00:28:33.760><c> not</c><00:28:33.919><c> give</c><00:28:34.159><c> freedom</c>

00:28:34.470 --> 00:28:34.480 align:start position:0%
old aristocracy. It did not give freedom
 

00:28:34.480 --> 00:28:35.750 align:start position:0%
old aristocracy. It did not give freedom
to<00:28:34.640><c> everybody,</c><00:28:35.039><c> but</c><00:28:35.200><c> the</c><00:28:35.360><c> socialist</c>

00:28:35.750 --> 00:28:35.760 align:start position:0%
to everybody, but the socialist
 

00:28:35.760 --> 00:28:37.430 align:start position:0%
to everybody, but the socialist
revolution<00:28:36.240><c> will.</c><00:28:36.559><c> Sargon</c><00:28:37.120><c> believes</c><00:28:37.279><c> that</c>

00:28:37.430 --> 00:28:37.440 align:start position:0%
revolution will. Sargon believes that
 

00:28:37.440 --> 00:28:39.029 align:start position:0%
revolution will. Sargon believes that
Markx<00:28:37.760><c> was</c><00:28:37.919><c> right</c><00:28:38.080><c> on</c><00:28:38.240><c> this,</c><00:28:38.559><c> and</c><00:28:38.799><c> his</c>

00:28:39.029 --> 00:28:39.039 align:start position:0%
Markx was right on this, and his
 

00:28:39.039 --> 00:28:40.470 align:start position:0%
Markx was right on this, and his
solution<00:28:39.360><c> is</c><00:28:39.600><c> to</c><00:28:39.760><c> reject</c><00:28:40.000><c> the</c><00:28:40.159><c> liberal</c>

00:28:40.470 --> 00:28:40.480 align:start position:0%
solution is to reject the liberal
 

00:28:40.480 --> 00:28:41.590 align:start position:0%
solution is to reject the liberal
revolution<00:28:40.880><c> and</c><00:28:41.039><c> the</c><00:28:41.120><c> enlightenment</c>

00:28:41.590 --> 00:28:41.600 align:start position:0%
revolution and the enlightenment
 

00:28:41.600 --> 00:28:43.430 align:start position:0%
revolution and the enlightenment
entirely.<00:28:42.159><c> This</c><00:28:42.399><c> is</c><00:28:42.480><c> why</c><00:28:42.640><c> Sargon</c><00:28:43.120><c> has</c><00:28:43.200><c> taken</c>

00:28:43.430 --> 00:28:43.440 align:start position:0%
entirely. This is why Sargon has taken
 

00:28:43.440 --> 00:28:44.950 align:start position:0%
entirely. This is why Sargon has taken
to<00:28:43.600><c> calling</c><00:28:43.840><c> everyone</c><00:28:44.159><c> and</c><00:28:44.399><c> anyone</c><00:28:44.720><c> to</c><00:28:44.880><c> the</c>

00:28:44.950 --> 00:28:44.960 align:start position:0%
to calling everyone and anyone to the
 

00:28:44.960 --> 00:28:46.789 align:start position:0%
to calling everyone and anyone to the
left<00:28:45.120><c> of</c><00:28:45.279><c> him</c><00:28:45.520><c> a</c><00:28:45.760><c> communist,</c><00:28:46.320><c> which</c><00:28:46.559><c> in</c>

00:28:46.789 --> 00:28:46.799 align:start position:0%
left of him a communist, which in
 

00:28:46.799 --> 00:28:48.950 align:start position:0%
left of him a communist, which in
reality<00:28:47.120><c> is</c><00:28:47.360><c> about</c><00:28:47.600><c> as</c><00:28:47.840><c> dumb</c><00:28:48.159><c> as</c><00:28:48.399><c> lefttoids</c>

00:28:48.950 --> 00:28:48.960 align:start position:0%
reality is about as dumb as lefttoids
 

00:28:48.960 --> 00:28:50.389 align:start position:0%
reality is about as dumb as lefttoids
calling<00:28:49.200><c> everyone</c><00:28:49.440><c> a</c><00:28:49.600><c> Nazi.</c><00:28:50.080><c> But</c><00:28:50.159><c> I've</c>

00:28:50.389 --> 00:28:50.399 align:start position:0%
calling everyone a Nazi. But I've
 

00:28:50.399 --> 00:28:51.750 align:start position:0%
calling everyone a Nazi. But I've
already<00:28:50.559><c> complained</c><00:28:50.880><c> about</c><00:28:51.039><c> that</c><00:28:51.200><c> in</c><00:28:51.440><c> several</c>

00:28:51.750 --> 00:28:51.760 align:start position:0%
already complained about that in several
 

00:28:51.760 --> 00:28:53.190 align:start position:0%
already complained about that in several
recent<00:28:52.159><c> videos.</c><00:28:52.480><c> We</c><00:28:52.640><c> don't</c><00:28:52.720><c> got</c><00:28:52.880><c> to</c><00:28:52.960><c> do</c><00:28:53.039><c> this</c>

00:28:53.190 --> 00:28:53.200 align:start position:0%
recent videos. We don't got to do this
 

00:28:53.200 --> 00:28:54.950 align:start position:0%
recent videos. We don't got to do this
again.<00:28:53.520><c> Anyway,</c><00:28:53.919><c> here</c><00:28:54.080><c> is</c><00:28:54.240><c> how</c><00:28:54.399><c> Sargon</c>

00:28:54.950 --> 00:28:54.960 align:start position:0%
again. Anyway, here is how Sargon
 

00:28:54.960 --> 00:28:57.430 align:start position:0%
again. Anyway, here is how Sargon
describes<00:28:55.279><c> my</c><00:28:55.520><c> position.</c><00:28:56.000><c> He</c><00:28:56.240><c> says,</c><00:28:56.880><c> "Nobody</c>

00:28:57.430 --> 00:28:57.440 align:start position:0%
describes my position. He says, "Nobody
 

00:28:57.440 --> 00:28:59.110 align:start position:0%
describes my position. He says, "Nobody
reasonable<00:28:58.080><c> actually</c><00:28:58.399><c> thinks</c><00:28:58.640><c> that</c><00:28:58.799><c> trans</c>

00:28:59.110 --> 00:28:59.120 align:start position:0%
reasonable actually thinks that trans
 

00:28:59.120 --> 00:29:01.590 align:start position:0%
reasonable actually thinks that trans
women<00:28:59.440><c> metamorphos</c><00:29:00.640><c> into</c><00:29:00.960><c> biological</c>

00:29:01.590 --> 00:29:01.600 align:start position:0%
women metamorphos into biological
 

00:29:01.600 --> 00:29:05.029 align:start position:0%
women metamorphos into biological
females."<00:29:02.640><c> And</c><00:29:03.200><c> the</c><00:29:03.520><c> ask</c><00:29:03.840><c> is</c><00:29:04.159><c> not</c><00:29:04.720><c> believe</c>

00:29:05.029 --> 00:29:05.039 align:start position:0%
females." And the ask is not believe
 

00:29:05.039 --> 00:29:07.029 align:start position:0%
females." And the ask is not believe
that<00:29:05.200><c> men</c><00:29:05.440><c> are</c><00:29:05.600><c> women.</c><00:29:06.240><c> It's</c><00:29:06.559><c> don't</c><00:29:06.720><c> be</c><00:29:06.880><c> an</c>

00:29:07.029 --> 00:29:07.039 align:start position:0%
that men are women. It's don't be an
 

00:29:07.039 --> 00:29:08.789 align:start position:0%
that men are women. It's don't be an
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;]<00:29:07.600><c> If</c><00:29:07.760><c> you</c><00:29:07.919><c> you</c><00:29:08.159><c> don't</c><00:29:08.320><c> have</c><00:29:08.399><c> to</c><00:29:08.559><c> like</c>

00:29:08.789 --> 00:29:08.799 align:start position:0%
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;] If you you don't have to like
 

00:29:08.799 --> 00:29:10.950 align:start position:0%
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;] If you you don't have to like
trans<00:29:09.120><c> people,</c><00:29:09.919><c> you</c><00:29:10.159><c> do</c><00:29:10.320><c> have</c><00:29:10.480><c> to</c><00:29:10.640><c> leave</c><00:29:10.799><c> them</c>

00:29:10.950 --> 00:29:10.960 align:start position:0%
trans people, you do have to leave them
 

00:29:10.960 --> 00:29:13.110 align:start position:0%
trans people, you do have to leave them
alone.<00:29:11.760><c> Um,</c><00:29:12.399><c> but</c><00:29:12.480><c> I</c><00:29:12.640><c> mean,</c><00:29:12.799><c> I'm</c><00:29:12.960><c> not</c>

00:29:13.110 --> 00:29:13.120 align:start position:0%
alone. Um, but I mean, I'm not
 

00:29:13.120 --> 00:29:15.110 align:start position:0%
alone. Um, but I mean, I'm not
interested<00:29:13.360><c> in</c><00:29:14.080><c> in</c><00:29:14.399><c> doing</c><00:29:14.640><c> anything</c><00:29:14.880><c> with</c>

00:29:15.110 --> 00:29:15.120 align:start position:0%
interested in in doing anything with
 

00:29:15.120 --> 00:29:17.190 align:start position:0%
interested in in doing anything with
trans<00:29:15.440><c> people.</c><00:29:15.840><c> So,</c><00:29:16.240><c> I'm</c><00:29:16.559><c> happy</c><00:29:16.799><c> to</c><00:29:16.960><c> leave</c>

00:29:17.190 --> 00:29:17.200 align:start position:0%
trans people. So, I'm happy to leave
 

00:29:17.200 --> 00:29:19.830 align:start position:0%
trans people. So, I'm happy to leave
them<00:29:17.440><c> alone.</c><00:29:18.799><c> They're</c><00:29:19.039><c> just</c><00:29:19.200><c> not</c><00:29:19.360><c> allowed</c>

00:29:19.830 --> 00:29:19.840 align:start position:0%
them alone. They're just not allowed
 

00:29:19.840 --> 00:29:21.909 align:start position:0%
them alone. They're just not allowed
into<00:29:20.159><c> the</c><00:29:20.399><c> same</c><00:29:20.640><c> changing</c><00:29:21.120><c> room</c><00:29:21.360><c> as</c><00:29:21.679><c> my</c>

00:29:21.909 --> 00:29:21.919 align:start position:0%
into the same changing room as my
 

00:29:21.919 --> 00:29:25.669 align:start position:0%
into the same changing room as my
daughters<00:29:22.559><c> cuz</c><00:29:22.799><c> they're</c><00:29:23.200><c> men.</c><00:29:24.640><c> So,</c><00:29:25.360><c> there's</c>

00:29:25.669 --> 00:29:25.679 align:start position:0%
daughters cuz they're men. So, there's
 

00:29:25.679 --> 00:29:28.950 align:start position:0%
daughters cuz they're men. So, there's
that.<00:29:26.640><c> Maybe</c><00:29:26.880><c> if</c><00:29:27.120><c> they</c><00:29:27.440><c> I</c><00:29:27.679><c> mean,</c><00:29:27.919><c> and</c><00:29:28.080><c> this</c><00:29:28.240><c> is</c>

00:29:28.950 --> 00:29:28.960 align:start position:0%
that. Maybe if they I mean, and this is
 

00:29:28.960 --> 00:29:30.470 align:start position:0%
that. Maybe if they I mean, and this is
this<00:29:29.200><c> this</c><00:29:29.440><c> is</c><00:29:29.520><c> the</c><00:29:29.760><c> eternal</c><00:29:30.159><c> problem</c><00:29:30.320><c> with</c>

00:29:30.470 --> 00:29:30.480 align:start position:0%
this this is the eternal problem with
 

00:29:30.480 --> 00:29:31.909 align:start position:0%
this this is the eternal problem with
the<00:29:30.559><c> the</c><00:29:30.799><c> term</c><00:29:31.039><c> trans</c><00:29:31.279><c> rights</c><00:29:31.440><c> to</c><00:29:31.760><c> human</c>

00:29:31.909 --> 00:29:31.919 align:start position:0%
the the term trans rights to human
 

00:29:31.919 --> 00:29:34.310 align:start position:0%
the the term trans rights to human
rights.<00:29:32.880><c> Name</c><00:29:33.200><c> a</c><00:29:33.360><c> human</c><00:29:33.600><c> right</c><00:29:33.840><c> you</c><00:29:34.080><c> don't</c>

00:29:34.310 --> 00:29:34.320 align:start position:0%
rights. Name a human right you don't
 

00:29:34.320 --> 00:29:37.190 align:start position:0%
rights. Name a human right you don't
have.<00:29:35.360><c> And</c><00:29:35.600><c> the</c><00:29:35.760><c> trans</c><00:29:36.159><c> lobby</c><00:29:36.640><c> would</c><00:29:36.880><c> be</c><00:29:37.039><c> like,</c>

00:29:37.190 --> 00:29:37.200 align:start position:0%
have. And the trans lobby would be like,
 

00:29:37.200 --> 00:29:39.029 align:start position:0%
have. And the trans lobby would be like,
"Well,<00:29:37.520><c> we</c><00:29:37.760><c> want</c><00:29:37.840><c> the</c><00:29:38.080><c> right</c><00:29:38.240><c> to</c><00:29:38.480><c> go</c><00:29:38.640><c> into</c><00:29:38.880><c> the</c>

00:29:39.029 --> 00:29:39.039 align:start position:0%
"Well, we want the right to go into the
 

00:29:39.039 --> 00:29:41.029 align:start position:0%
"Well, we want the right to go into the
women's<00:29:39.440><c> bathroom."</c><00:29:40.640><c> And</c><00:29:40.720><c> you'd</c><00:29:40.960><c> be</c><00:29:41.039><c> like,</c>

00:29:41.029 --> 00:29:41.039 align:start position:0%
women's bathroom." And you'd be like,
 

00:29:41.039 --> 00:29:43.909 align:start position:0%
women's bathroom." And you'd be like,
"Well,<00:29:41.600><c> I</c><00:29:41.840><c> don't</c><00:29:42.000><c> have</c><00:29:42.080><c> that</c><00:29:42.399><c> right.</c>

00:29:43.909 --> 00:29:43.919 align:start position:0%
"Well, I don't have that right.
 

00:29:43.919 --> 00:29:45.750 align:start position:0%
"Well, I don't have that right.
You're<00:29:44.159><c> a</c><00:29:44.399><c> male.</c><00:29:44.960><c> You</c><00:29:45.200><c> don't</c><00:29:45.360><c> have</c><00:29:45.520><c> that</c>

00:29:45.750 --> 00:29:45.760 align:start position:0%
You're a male. You don't have that
 

00:29:45.760 --> 00:29:48.230 align:start position:0%
You're a male. You don't have that
right."<00:29:46.399><c> And</c><00:29:46.559><c> the</c><00:29:46.799><c> the</c><00:29:47.039><c> women</c><00:29:47.440><c> being</c><00:29:47.760><c> females</c>

00:29:48.230 --> 00:29:48.240 align:start position:0%
right." And the the women being females
 

00:29:48.240 --> 00:29:49.269 align:start position:0%
right." And the the women being females
don't<00:29:48.399><c> have</c><00:29:48.480><c> the</c><00:29:48.559><c> right</c><00:29:48.720><c> to</c><00:29:48.799><c> come</c><00:29:48.880><c> into</c><00:29:49.120><c> our</c>

00:29:49.269 --> 00:29:49.279 align:start position:0%
don't have the right to come into our
 

00:29:49.279 --> 00:29:51.590 align:start position:0%
don't have the right to come into our
bathrooms<00:29:49.760><c> either.</c><00:29:50.720><c> Actually,</c><00:29:51.039><c> it's</c><00:29:51.279><c> not</c><00:29:51.440><c> a</c>

00:29:51.590 --> 00:29:51.600 align:start position:0%
bathrooms either. Actually, it's not a
 

00:29:51.600 --> 00:29:53.110 align:start position:0%
bathrooms either. Actually, it's not a
human<00:29:51.840><c> right</c><00:29:52.000><c> to</c><00:29:52.240><c> go</c><00:29:52.320><c> into</c><00:29:52.559><c> the</c><00:29:52.720><c> bathroom</c><00:29:52.960><c> of</c>

00:29:53.110 --> 00:29:53.120 align:start position:0%
human right to go into the bathroom of
 

00:29:53.120 --> 00:29:55.510 align:start position:0%
human right to go into the bathroom of
the<00:29:53.279><c> opposite</c><00:29:53.600><c> sex.</c><00:29:54.240><c> So,</c><00:29:54.399><c> you're</c><00:29:54.720><c> asking</c><00:29:55.200><c> for</c>

00:29:55.510 --> 00:29:55.520 align:start position:0%
the opposite sex. So, you're asking for
 

00:29:55.520 --> 00:29:57.830 align:start position:0%
the opposite sex. So, you're asking for
extra<00:29:56.000><c> rights</c><00:29:56.320><c> that</c><00:29:56.640><c> don't</c><00:29:56.880><c> actually</c><00:29:57.200><c> exist.</c>

00:29:57.830 --> 00:29:57.840 align:start position:0%
extra rights that don't actually exist.
 

00:29:57.840 --> 00:29:59.909 align:start position:0%
extra rights that don't actually exist.
And<00:29:58.080><c> frankly,</c><00:29:58.799><c> I</c><00:29:59.120><c> think</c><00:29:59.200><c> we</c><00:29:59.440><c> should</c><00:29:59.600><c> just</c><00:29:59.760><c> be</c>

00:29:59.909 --> 00:29:59.919 align:start position:0%
And frankly, I think we should just be
 

00:29:59.919 --> 00:30:01.990 align:start position:0%
And frankly, I think we should just be
denying<00:30:00.320><c> that.</c><00:30:00.720><c> No,</c><00:30:01.039><c> you</c><00:30:01.279><c> do</c><00:30:01.440><c> not</c><00:30:01.679><c> have</c><00:30:01.760><c> that</c>

00:30:01.990 --> 00:30:02.000 align:start position:0%
denying that. No, you do not have that
 

00:30:02.000 --> 00:30:03.830 align:start position:0%
denying that. No, you do not have that
right<00:30:02.159><c> and</c><00:30:02.399><c> you</c><00:30:02.559><c> will</c><00:30:02.720><c> not</c><00:30:02.880><c> get</c><00:30:03.039><c> that</c><00:30:03.200><c> right.</c>

00:30:03.830 --> 00:30:03.840 align:start position:0%
right and you will not get that right.
 

00:30:03.840 --> 00:30:05.669 align:start position:0%
right and you will not get that right.
But<00:30:04.000><c> beyond</c><00:30:04.399><c> this,</c><00:30:04.960><c> you're</c><00:30:05.200><c> right.</c><00:30:05.440><c> I</c><00:30:05.600><c> don't</c>

00:30:05.669 --> 00:30:05.679 align:start position:0%
But beyond this, you're right. I don't
 

00:30:05.679 --> 00:30:06.710 align:start position:0%
But beyond this, you're right. I don't
want<00:30:05.760><c> to</c><00:30:05.840><c> have</c><00:30:05.919><c> anything</c><00:30:06.159><c> to</c><00:30:06.240><c> do</c><00:30:06.320><c> with</c><00:30:06.480><c> them.</c>

00:30:06.710 --> 00:30:06.720 align:start position:0%
want to have anything to do with them.
 

00:30:06.720 --> 00:30:10.149 align:start position:0%
want to have anything to do with them.
So,<00:30:07.039><c> you</c><00:30:07.200><c> know,</c><00:30:08.000><c> um</c><00:30:08.320><c> the</c><00:30:08.559><c> the</c><00:30:09.520><c> what</c><00:30:09.679><c> what</c><00:30:10.000><c> would</c>

00:30:10.149 --> 00:30:10.159 align:start position:0%
So, you know, um the the what what would
 

00:30:10.159 --> 00:30:13.750 align:start position:0%
So, you know, um the the what what would
I<00:30:10.320><c> want</c><00:30:10.559><c> to</c><00:30:10.799><c> have</c><00:30:10.960><c> to</c><00:30:11.120><c> do</c><00:30:11.840><c> with</c><00:30:12.399><c> these</c><00:30:12.960><c> people?</c>

00:30:13.750 --> 00:30:13.760 align:start position:0%
I want to have to do with these people?
 

00:30:13.760 --> 00:30:16.870 align:start position:0%
I want to have to do with these people?
Um<00:30:14.399><c> but</c><00:30:14.720><c> anyway,</c><00:30:15.360><c> the</c><00:30:15.679><c> point</c><00:30:15.919><c> that</c><00:30:16.399><c> we</c><00:30:16.720><c> have</c>

00:30:16.870 --> 00:30:16.880 align:start position:0%
Um but anyway, the point that we have
 

00:30:16.880 --> 00:30:19.350 align:start position:0%
Um but anyway, the point that we have
arrived<00:30:17.279><c> at</c><00:30:17.520><c> with</c><00:30:17.760><c> Dev</c><00:30:18.320><c> is</c><00:30:18.559><c> he's</c><00:30:18.880><c> trying</c><00:30:19.039><c> to</c>

00:30:19.350 --> 00:30:19.360 align:start position:0%
arrived at with Dev is he's trying to
 

00:30:19.360 --> 00:30:23.430 align:start position:0%
arrived at with Dev is he's trying to
open<00:30:19.679><c> up</c><00:30:20.399><c> this</c><00:30:20.720><c> gap.</c><00:30:21.679><c> The</c><00:30:21.919><c> ask</c><00:30:22.320><c> being</c><00:30:22.880><c> is</c><00:30:23.200><c> not</c>

00:30:23.430 --> 00:30:23.440 align:start position:0%
open up this gap. The ask being is not
 

00:30:23.440 --> 00:30:26.230 align:start position:0%
open up this gap. The ask being is not
believe<00:30:23.760><c> that</c><00:30:23.919><c> men</c><00:30:24.080><c> are</c><00:30:24.240><c> women.</c>

00:30:26.230 --> 00:30:26.240 align:start position:0%
believe that men are women.
 

00:30:26.240 --> 00:30:29.750 align:start position:0%
believe that men are women.
The<00:30:26.559><c> problem</c><00:30:26.799><c> is</c><00:30:28.000><c> that's</c><00:30:28.320><c> not</c><00:30:28.640><c> true.</c><00:30:29.520><c> It's</c>

00:30:29.750 --> 00:30:29.760 align:start position:0%
The problem is that's not true. It's
 

00:30:29.760 --> 00:30:31.830 align:start position:0%
The problem is that's not true. It's
never<00:30:30.000><c> been</c><00:30:30.240><c> true.</c><00:30:30.799><c> When</c><00:30:31.039><c> they</c><00:30:31.200><c> say</c><00:30:31.520><c> trans</c>

00:30:31.830 --> 00:30:31.840 align:start position:0%
never been true. When they say trans
 

00:30:31.840 --> 00:30:34.389 align:start position:0%
never been true. When they say trans
women<00:30:32.159><c> are</c><00:30:32.320><c> women,</c><00:30:32.880><c> they</c><00:30:33.120><c> are</c><00:30:33.279><c> not</c><00:30:33.520><c> saying</c>

00:30:34.389 --> 00:30:34.399 align:start position:0%
women are women, they are not saying
 

00:30:34.399 --> 00:30:36.710 align:start position:0%
women are women, they are not saying
trans<00:30:34.720><c> women</c><00:30:35.360><c> aren't</c><00:30:35.679><c> really</c><00:30:36.000><c> women,</c><00:30:36.480><c> but</c>

00:30:36.710 --> 00:30:36.720 align:start position:0%
trans women aren't really women, but
 

00:30:36.720 --> 00:30:38.070 align:start position:0%
trans women aren't really women, but
we're<00:30:36.880><c> going</c><00:30:36.960><c> to</c><00:30:37.120><c> pretend</c><00:30:37.360><c> they're</c><00:30:37.600><c> women</c><00:30:37.840><c> to</c>

00:30:38.070 --> 00:30:38.080 align:start position:0%
we're going to pretend they're women to
 

00:30:38.080 --> 00:30:39.990 align:start position:0%
we're going to pretend they're women to
protect<00:30:38.320><c> their</c><00:30:38.559><c> feelings.</c><00:30:39.520><c> What</c><00:30:39.679><c> they're</c>

00:30:39.990 --> 00:30:40.000 align:start position:0%
protect their feelings. What they're
 

00:30:40.000 --> 00:30:43.029 align:start position:0%
protect their feelings. What they're
saying<00:30:40.240><c> is</c><00:30:40.559><c> literally</c><00:30:41.919><c> trans</c><00:30:42.240><c> women</c><00:30:42.720><c> are</c>

00:30:43.029 --> 00:30:43.039 align:start position:0%
saying is literally trans women are
 

00:30:43.039 --> 00:30:45.350 align:start position:0%
saying is literally trans women are
actual<00:30:43.600><c> women.</c><00:30:44.480><c> And</c><00:30:44.640><c> they</c><00:30:44.799><c> have</c><00:30:44.960><c> been</c><00:30:45.120><c> saying</c>

00:30:45.350 --> 00:30:45.360 align:start position:0%
actual women. And they have been saying
 

00:30:45.360 --> 00:30:48.470 align:start position:0%
actual women. And they have been saying
this<00:30:45.760><c> the</c><00:30:46.080><c> whole</c><00:30:46.399><c> time.</c><00:30:47.520><c> And</c><00:30:47.760><c> Dev,</c><00:30:48.240><c> the</c>

00:30:48.470 --> 00:30:48.480 align:start position:0%
this the whole time. And Dev, the
 

00:30:48.480 --> 00:30:50.950 align:start position:0%
this the whole time. And Dev, the
liberal,<00:30:49.039><c> wishing</c><00:30:49.360><c> to</c><00:30:49.520><c> be</c><00:30:49.760><c> tolerant</c><00:30:50.320><c> of</c><00:30:50.640><c> trans</c>

00:30:50.950 --> 00:30:50.960 align:start position:0%
liberal, wishing to be tolerant of trans
 

00:30:50.960 --> 00:30:53.110 align:start position:0%
liberal, wishing to be tolerant of trans
people,<00:30:51.840><c> says,</c><00:30:52.159><c> "Well,</c><00:30:52.559><c> I'm</c><00:30:52.799><c> going</c><00:30:52.880><c> to</c><00:30:52.960><c> be</c>

00:30:53.110 --> 00:30:53.120 align:start position:0%
people, says, "Well, I'm going to be
 

00:30:53.120 --> 00:30:55.190 align:start position:0%
people, says, "Well, I'm going to be
tolerant,<00:30:54.000><c> but</c><00:30:54.240><c> I'm</c><00:30:54.480><c> going</c><00:30:54.640><c> to</c><00:30:54.799><c> accept</c><00:30:55.039><c> that</c>

00:30:55.190 --> 00:30:55.200 align:start position:0%
tolerant, but I'm going to accept that
 

00:30:55.200 --> 00:30:57.909 align:start position:0%
tolerant, but I'm going to accept that
it's<00:30:55.440><c> not</c><00:30:55.679><c> real,</c><00:30:56.559><c> and</c><00:30:56.799><c> I'm</c><00:30:57.039><c> going</c><00:30:57.200><c> to</c><00:30:57.360><c> expect</c>

00:30:57.909 --> 00:30:57.919 align:start position:0%
it's not real, and I'm going to expect
 

00:30:57.919 --> 00:31:00.310 align:start position:0%
it's not real, and I'm going to expect
everyone<00:30:58.480><c> to</c><00:30:58.799><c> just</c><00:30:59.039><c> exist</c><00:30:59.520><c> on</c><00:30:59.760><c> the</c><00:31:00.000><c> point</c><00:31:00.159><c> of</c>

00:31:00.310 --> 00:31:00.320 align:start position:0%
everyone to just exist on the point of
 

00:31:00.320 --> 00:31:01.909 align:start position:0%
everyone to just exist on the point of
that<00:31:00.640><c> contradiction."</c><00:31:01.679><c> Now,</c>

00:31:01.909 --> 00:31:01.919 align:start position:0%
that contradiction." Now,
 

00:31:01.919 --> 00:31:03.750 align:start position:0%
that contradiction." Now,
unsurprisingly,<00:31:02.720><c> people</c><00:31:03.039><c> don't</c><00:31:03.360><c> actually</c>

00:31:03.750 --> 00:31:03.760 align:start position:0%
unsurprisingly, people don't actually
 

00:31:03.760 --> 00:31:05.350 align:start position:0%
unsurprisingly, people don't actually
like<00:31:04.080><c> existing</c><00:31:04.720><c> at</c><00:31:04.880><c> the</c><00:31:05.039><c> point</c><00:31:05.200><c> of</c>

00:31:05.350 --> 00:31:05.360 align:start position:0%
like existing at the point of
 

00:31:05.360 --> 00:31:08.149 align:start position:0%
like existing at the point of
contradiction.<00:31:06.480><c> People</c><00:31:06.880><c> like</c><00:31:07.279><c> consistency.</c>

00:31:08.149 --> 00:31:08.159 align:start position:0%
contradiction. People like consistency.
 

00:31:08.159 --> 00:31:10.870 align:start position:0%
contradiction. People like consistency.
Actually,<00:31:08.640><c> people</c><00:31:08.880><c> like</c><00:31:09.120><c> to</c><00:31:09.360><c> have</c><00:31:09.919><c> a</c><00:31:10.320><c> logical</c>

00:31:10.870 --> 00:31:10.880 align:start position:0%
Actually, people like to have a logical
 

00:31:10.880 --> 00:31:14.070 align:start position:0%
Actually, people like to have a logical
throughun<00:31:11.679><c> on</c><00:31:12.080><c> a</c><00:31:12.399><c> certain</c><00:31:12.799><c> premise</c><00:31:13.360><c> and</c>

00:31:14.070 --> 00:31:14.080 align:start position:0%
throughun on a certain premise and
 

00:31:14.080 --> 00:31:15.909 align:start position:0%
throughun on a certain premise and
follow<00:31:14.320><c> through</c><00:31:14.559><c> to</c><00:31:14.720><c> the</c><00:31:14.880><c> conclusion.</c><00:31:15.760><c> They</c>

00:31:15.909 --> 00:31:15.919 align:start position:0%
follow through to the conclusion. They
 

00:31:15.919 --> 00:31:17.430 align:start position:0%
follow through to the conclusion. They
don't<00:31:16.080><c> want</c><00:31:16.159><c> to</c><00:31:16.320><c> say,</c><00:31:16.399><c> "Well,</c><00:31:16.880><c> I</c><00:31:17.120><c> mean,</c><00:31:17.200><c> we're</c>

00:31:17.430 --> 00:31:17.440 align:start position:0%
don't want to say, "Well, I mean, we're
 

00:31:17.440 --> 00:31:18.710 align:start position:0%
don't want to say, "Well, I mean, we're
all<00:31:17.600><c> just</c><00:31:17.760><c> pretending</c><00:31:18.080><c> that's</c><00:31:18.320><c> a</c><00:31:18.480><c> woman,</c>

00:31:18.710 --> 00:31:18.720 align:start position:0%
all just pretending that's a woman,
 

00:31:18.720 --> 00:31:20.549 align:start position:0%
all just pretending that's a woman,
right?"<00:31:19.279><c> This</c><00:31:19.520><c> isn't</c><00:31:19.760><c> quite</c><00:31:20.000><c> right,</c><00:31:20.159><c> but</c><00:31:20.399><c> I'm</c>

00:31:20.549 --> 00:31:20.559 align:start position:0%
right?" This isn't quite right, but I'm
 

00:31:20.559 --> 00:31:21.909 align:start position:0%
right?" This isn't quite right, but I'm
not<00:31:20.640><c> going</c><00:31:20.720><c> to</c><00:31:20.799><c> blame</c><00:31:20.960><c> him</c><00:31:21.120><c> for</c><00:31:21.279><c> it</c><00:31:21.520><c> because</c><00:31:21.760><c> to</c>

00:31:21.909 --> 00:31:21.919 align:start position:0%
not going to blame him for it because to
 

00:31:21.919 --> 00:31:23.510 align:start position:0%
not going to blame him for it because to
be<00:31:22.080><c> honest,</c><00:31:22.320><c> I</c><00:31:22.480><c> didn't</c><00:31:22.640><c> pay</c><00:31:22.799><c> for</c><00:31:22.960><c> a</c><00:31:23.120><c> blue</c><00:31:23.279><c> check</c>

00:31:23.510 --> 00:31:23.520 align:start position:0%
be honest, I didn't pay for a blue check
 

00:31:23.520 --> 00:31:25.110 align:start position:0%
be honest, I didn't pay for a blue check
mark<00:31:23.679><c> on</c><00:31:23.919><c> Twitter,</c><00:31:24.240><c> and</c><00:31:24.480><c> so</c><00:31:24.720><c> I</c><00:31:24.960><c> didn't</c>

00:31:25.110 --> 00:31:25.120 align:start position:0%
mark on Twitter, and so I didn't
 

00:31:25.120 --> 00:31:26.710 align:start position:0%
mark on Twitter, and so I didn't
actually<00:31:25.360><c> fit</c><00:31:25.600><c> in</c><00:31:25.760><c> the</c><00:31:25.919><c> entirety</c><00:31:26.240><c> of</c><00:31:26.320><c> my</c><00:31:26.559><c> view</c>

00:31:26.710 --> 00:31:26.720 align:start position:0%
actually fit in the entirety of my view
 

00:31:26.720 --> 00:31:28.870 align:start position:0%
actually fit in the entirety of my view
in<00:31:26.960><c> this</c><00:31:27.120><c> one</c><00:31:27.360><c> tweet.</c><00:31:27.919><c> So,</c><00:31:28.320><c> here</c><00:31:28.559><c> is</c><00:31:28.720><c> the</c>

00:31:28.870 --> 00:31:28.880 align:start position:0%
in this one tweet. So, here is the
 

00:31:28.880 --> 00:31:30.870 align:start position:0%
in this one tweet. So, here is the
entirety<00:31:29.279><c> of</c><00:31:29.360><c> my</c><00:31:29.600><c> view.</c><00:31:30.000><c> Are</c><00:31:30.240><c> trans</c><00:31:30.559><c> women</c>

00:31:30.870 --> 00:31:30.880 align:start position:0%
entirety of my view. Are trans women
 

00:31:30.880 --> 00:31:32.389 align:start position:0%
entirety of my view. Are trans women
female?<00:31:31.520><c> If</c><00:31:31.679><c> you</c><00:31:31.760><c> want</c><00:31:31.840><c> to</c><00:31:32.000><c> say</c><00:31:32.159><c> they're</c>

00:31:32.389 --> 00:31:32.399 align:start position:0%
female? If you want to say they're
 

00:31:32.399 --> 00:31:33.990 align:start position:0%
female? If you want to say they're
hormonally<00:31:32.960><c> female</c><00:31:33.440><c> due</c><00:31:33.600><c> to</c><00:31:33.679><c> what</c><00:31:33.840><c> we</c>

00:31:33.990 --> 00:31:34.000 align:start position:0%
hormonally female due to what we
 

00:31:34.000 --> 00:31:35.510 align:start position:0%
hormonally female due to what we
discussed<00:31:34.240><c> earlier,</c><00:31:34.559><c> I</c><00:31:34.720><c> get</c><00:31:34.799><c> the</c><00:31:34.960><c> logic,</c><00:31:35.360><c> but</c>

00:31:35.510 --> 00:31:35.520 align:start position:0%
discussed earlier, I get the logic, but
 

00:31:35.520 --> 00:31:37.430 align:start position:0%
discussed earlier, I get the logic, but
they're<00:31:35.760><c> not</c><00:31:36.000><c> completely</c><00:31:36.480><c> female.</c><00:31:37.039><c> Like</c><00:31:37.279><c> I</c>

00:31:37.430 --> 00:31:37.440 align:start position:0%
they're not completely female. Like I
 

00:31:37.440 --> 00:31:39.269 align:start position:0%
they're not completely female. Like I
said<00:31:37.519><c> earlier,</c><00:31:38.000><c> females</c><00:31:38.480><c> are</c><00:31:38.640><c> the</c><00:31:38.799><c> sex</c><00:31:38.960><c> of</c><00:31:39.120><c> a</c>

00:31:39.269 --> 00:31:39.279 align:start position:0%
said earlier, females are the sex of a
 

00:31:39.279 --> 00:31:41.029 align:start position:0%
said earlier, females are the sex of a
species<00:31:39.600><c> that</c><00:31:39.840><c> produces</c><00:31:40.159><c> large</c><00:31:40.399><c> gameamtes.</c>

00:31:41.029 --> 00:31:41.039 align:start position:0%
species that produces large gameamtes.
 

00:31:41.039 --> 00:31:42.630 align:start position:0%
species that produces large gameamtes.
Because<00:31:41.360><c> trans</c><00:31:41.600><c> women</c><00:31:41.919><c> do</c><00:31:42.080><c> not</c><00:31:42.159><c> produce</c><00:31:42.399><c> large</c>

00:31:42.630 --> 00:31:42.640 align:start position:0%
Because trans women do not produce large
 

00:31:42.640 --> 00:31:44.470 align:start position:0%
Because trans women do not produce large
gameamtes<00:31:43.200><c> during</c><00:31:43.519><c> the</c><00:31:43.679><c> normal</c><00:31:44.000><c> reproductive</c>

00:31:44.470 --> 00:31:44.480 align:start position:0%
gameamtes during the normal reproductive
 

00:31:44.480 --> 00:31:46.149 align:start position:0%
gameamtes during the normal reproductive
cycle<00:31:44.720><c> for</c><00:31:44.880><c> the</c><00:31:45.039><c> average</c><00:31:45.279><c> human</c><00:31:45.600><c> female,</c><00:31:46.000><c> they</c>

00:31:46.149 --> 00:31:46.159 align:start position:0%
cycle for the average human female, they
 

00:31:46.159 --> 00:31:47.990 align:start position:0%
cycle for the average human female, they
are<00:31:46.240><c> not</c><00:31:46.399><c> female.</c><00:31:47.039><c> They</c><00:31:47.200><c> can</c><00:31:47.279><c> be</c><00:31:47.440><c> male.</c><00:31:47.840><c> They</c>

00:31:47.990 --> 00:31:48.000 align:start position:0%
are not female. They can be male. They
 

00:31:48.000 --> 00:31:49.830 align:start position:0%
are not female. They can be male. They
can<00:31:48.080><c> be</c><00:31:48.240><c> neuter,</c><00:31:48.720><c> but</c><00:31:48.960><c> they</c><00:31:49.120><c> are</c><00:31:49.279><c> not</c><00:31:49.600><c> and</c>

00:31:49.830 --> 00:31:49.840 align:start position:0%
can be neuter, but they are not and
 

00:31:49.840 --> 00:31:51.750 align:start position:0%
can be neuter, but they are not and
never<00:31:50.159><c> will</c><00:31:50.399><c> be</c><00:31:50.640><c> female</c><00:31:51.120><c> unless</c><00:31:51.440><c> we</c><00:31:51.600><c> can</c>

00:31:51.750 --> 00:31:51.760 align:start position:0%
never will be female unless we can
 

00:31:51.760 --> 00:31:53.110 align:start position:0%
never will be female unless we can
figure<00:31:51.840><c> out</c><00:31:52.000><c> how</c><00:31:52.159><c> to</c><00:31:52.240><c> give</c><00:31:52.399><c> them</c><00:31:52.640><c> functioning</c>

00:31:53.110 --> 00:31:53.120 align:start position:0%
figure out how to give them functioning
 

00:31:53.120 --> 00:31:54.630 align:start position:0%
figure out how to give them functioning
ovaries<00:31:53.600><c> and</c><00:31:53.679><c> a</c><00:31:53.919><c> uterus</c><00:31:54.159><c> and</c><00:31:54.399><c> make</c><00:31:54.480><c> them</c>

00:31:54.630 --> 00:31:54.640 align:start position:0%
ovaries and a uterus and make them
 

00:31:54.640 --> 00:31:56.630 align:start position:0%
ovaries and a uterus and make them
fertile.<00:31:55.279><c> If</c><00:31:55.519><c> that</c><00:31:55.760><c> means</c><00:31:56.000><c> that</c><00:31:56.240><c> radicals</c>

00:31:56.630 --> 00:31:56.640 align:start position:0%
fertile. If that means that radicals
 

00:31:56.640 --> 00:31:58.389 align:start position:0%
fertile. If that means that radicals
like<00:31:56.799><c> Niara</c><00:31:57.279><c> think</c><00:31:57.440><c> I'm</c><00:31:57.600><c> transphobic,</c><00:31:58.240><c> I</c>

00:31:58.389 --> 00:31:58.399 align:start position:0%
like Niara think I'm transphobic, I
 

00:31:58.399 --> 00:32:00.310 align:start position:0%
like Niara think I'm transphobic, I
frankly<00:31:58.799><c> don't</c><00:31:58.960><c> care.</c><00:31:59.519><c> They're</c><00:31:59.760><c> wrong.</c><00:32:00.159><c> And</c>

00:32:00.310 --> 00:32:00.320 align:start position:0%
frankly don't care. They're wrong. And
 

00:32:00.320 --> 00:32:02.310 align:start position:0%
frankly don't care. They're wrong. And
the<00:32:00.480><c> fact</c><00:32:00.559><c> that</c><00:32:00.799><c> they</c><00:32:01.039><c> are</c><00:32:01.120><c> trans</c><00:32:01.440><c> and</c><00:32:01.679><c> I'm</c><00:32:01.919><c> not</c>

00:32:02.310 --> 00:32:02.320 align:start position:0%
the fact that they are trans and I'm not
 

00:32:02.320 --> 00:32:03.669 align:start position:0%
the fact that they are trans and I'm not
doesn't<00:32:02.640><c> mean</c><00:32:02.799><c> that</c><00:32:02.960><c> their</c><00:32:03.200><c> gaps</c><00:32:03.440><c> in</c>

00:32:03.669 --> 00:32:03.679 align:start position:0%
doesn't mean that their gaps in
 

00:32:03.679 --> 00:32:05.269 align:start position:0%
doesn't mean that their gaps in
reasoning<00:32:04.080><c> are</c><00:32:04.320><c> suddenly</c><00:32:04.720><c> more</c><00:32:04.960><c> important</c>

00:32:05.269 --> 00:32:05.279 align:start position:0%
reasoning are suddenly more important
 

00:32:05.279 --> 00:32:07.430 align:start position:0%
reasoning are suddenly more important
than<00:32:05.519><c> my</c><00:32:05.840><c> actual</c><00:32:06.159><c> logical</c><00:32:06.640><c> thinking.</c><00:32:07.200><c> I</c>

00:32:07.430 --> 00:32:07.440 align:start position:0%
than my actual logical thinking. I
 

00:32:07.440 --> 00:32:09.909 align:start position:0%
than my actual logical thinking. I
reject<00:32:07.840><c> this</c><00:32:08.080><c> woke</c><00:32:08.559><c> progressive</c><00:32:09.120><c> idea</c><00:32:09.440><c> that</c><00:32:09.679><c> a</c>

00:32:09.909 --> 00:32:09.919 align:start position:0%
reject this woke progressive idea that a
 

00:32:09.919 --> 00:32:12.230 align:start position:0%
reject this woke progressive idea that a
trans<00:32:10.399><c> voice</c><00:32:10.720><c> is</c><00:32:11.039><c> more</c><00:32:11.279><c> accurate</c><00:32:11.679><c> on</c><00:32:11.919><c> trans</c>

00:32:12.230 --> 00:32:12.240 align:start position:0%
trans voice is more accurate on trans
 

00:32:12.240 --> 00:32:14.389 align:start position:0%
trans voice is more accurate on trans
issues<00:32:12.640><c> than</c><00:32:12.799><c> a</c><00:32:12.960><c> cis</c><00:32:13.200><c> voice</c><00:32:13.679><c> solely</c><00:32:14.080><c> because</c>

00:32:14.389 --> 00:32:14.399 align:start position:0%
issues than a cis voice solely because
 

00:32:14.399 --> 00:32:16.950 align:start position:0%
issues than a cis voice solely because
that<00:32:14.720><c> voice</c><00:32:14.960><c> is</c><00:32:15.200><c> trans</c><00:32:15.760><c> because</c><00:32:16.080><c> being</c><00:32:16.480><c> trans</c>

00:32:16.950 --> 00:32:16.960 align:start position:0%
that voice is trans because being trans
 

00:32:16.960 --> 00:32:19.350 align:start position:0%
that voice is trans because being trans
doesn't<00:32:17.279><c> make</c><00:32:17.440><c> you</c><00:32:17.679><c> smart</c><00:32:18.080><c> or</c><00:32:18.399><c> correct.</c><00:32:19.039><c> So</c>

00:32:19.350 --> 00:32:19.360 align:start position:0%
doesn't make you smart or correct. So
 

00:32:19.360 --> 00:32:21.029 align:start position:0%
doesn't make you smart or correct. So
all<00:32:19.519><c> of</c><00:32:19.600><c> this</c><00:32:19.760><c> is</c><00:32:19.919><c> to</c><00:32:20.080><c> say</c><00:32:20.159><c> that</c><00:32:20.399><c> trans</c><00:32:20.720><c> women</c>

00:32:21.029 --> 00:32:21.039 align:start position:0%
all of this is to say that trans women
 

00:32:21.039 --> 00:32:23.190 align:start position:0%
all of this is to say that trans women
are<00:32:21.279><c> not</c><00:32:21.440><c> female.</c><00:32:22.080><c> Now</c><00:32:22.320><c> are</c><00:32:22.559><c> trans</c><00:32:22.880><c> women</c>

00:32:23.190 --> 00:32:23.200 align:start position:0%
are not female. Now are trans women
 

00:32:23.200 --> 00:32:25.029 align:start position:0%
are not female. Now are trans women
actually<00:32:23.519><c> women?</c><00:32:24.080><c> Well,</c><00:32:24.320><c> despite</c><00:32:24.720><c> pathy</c>

00:32:25.029 --> 00:32:25.039 align:start position:0%
actually women? Well, despite pathy
 

00:32:25.039 --> 00:32:26.470 align:start position:0%
actually women? Well, despite pathy
remarks<00:32:25.360><c> from</c><00:32:25.519><c> right-wingers,</c><00:32:26.159><c> this</c><00:32:26.320><c> is</c>

00:32:26.470 --> 00:32:26.480 align:start position:0%
remarks from right-wingers, this is
 

00:32:26.480 --> 00:32:28.149 align:start position:0%
remarks from right-wingers, this is
actually<00:32:26.720><c> complicated.</c><00:32:27.440><c> If</c><00:32:27.600><c> we're</c><00:32:27.760><c> going</c><00:32:27.919><c> by</c>

00:32:28.149 --> 00:32:28.159 align:start position:0%
actually complicated. If we're going by
 

00:32:28.159 --> 00:32:29.909 align:start position:0%
actually complicated. If we're going by
the<00:32:28.320><c> adult</c><00:32:28.640><c> human</c><00:32:28.960><c> female</c><00:32:29.360><c> definition,</c><00:32:29.760><c> then</c>

00:32:29.909 --> 00:32:29.919 align:start position:0%
the adult human female definition, then
 

00:32:29.919 --> 00:32:31.350 align:start position:0%
the adult human female definition, then
they're<00:32:30.080><c> just</c><00:32:30.240><c> not</c><00:32:30.399><c> women.</c><00:32:30.799><c> And</c><00:32:30.960><c> there</c><00:32:31.120><c> are</c>

00:32:31.350 --> 00:32:31.360 align:start position:0%
they're just not women. And there are
 

00:32:31.360 --> 00:32:32.710 align:start position:0%
they're just not women. And there are
right-wing<00:32:31.840><c> communities</c><00:32:32.159><c> out</c><00:32:32.320><c> there</c><00:32:32.480><c> where</c>

00:32:32.710 --> 00:32:32.720 align:start position:0%
right-wing communities out there where
 

00:32:32.720 --> 00:32:34.070 align:start position:0%
right-wing communities out there where
that<00:32:32.880><c> definition</c><00:32:33.120><c> of</c><00:32:33.279><c> the</c><00:32:33.360><c> word</c><00:32:33.519><c> is</c><00:32:33.600><c> in</c><00:32:33.840><c> use.</c>

00:32:34.070 --> 00:32:34.080 align:start position:0%
that definition of the word is in use.
 

00:32:34.080 --> 00:32:36.230 align:start position:0%
that definition of the word is in use.
Per<00:32:34.320><c> Vickenstein,</c><00:32:35.039><c> we</c><00:32:35.200><c> know</c><00:32:35.360><c> that</c><00:32:35.679><c> in</c><00:32:36.000><c> those</c>

00:32:36.230 --> 00:32:36.240 align:start position:0%
Per Vickenstein, we know that in those
 

00:32:36.240 --> 00:32:38.230 align:start position:0%
Per Vickenstein, we know that in those
spaces,<00:32:36.880><c> trans</c><00:32:37.120><c> women</c><00:32:37.440><c> are</c><00:32:37.600><c> not</c><00:32:37.760><c> women.</c>

00:32:38.230 --> 00:32:38.240 align:start position:0%
spaces, trans women are not women.
 

00:32:38.240 --> 00:32:39.830 align:start position:0%
spaces, trans women are not women.
However,<00:32:38.559><c> by</c><00:32:38.799><c> that</c><00:32:38.960><c> same</c><00:32:39.120><c> logic,</c><00:32:39.519><c> we</c><00:32:39.679><c> also</c>

00:32:39.830 --> 00:32:39.840 align:start position:0%
However, by that same logic, we also
 

00:32:39.840 --> 00:32:41.029 align:start position:0%
However, by that same logic, we also
know<00:32:39.919><c> that</c><00:32:40.080><c> there</c><00:32:40.240><c> are</c><00:32:40.399><c> spaces</c><00:32:40.640><c> where</c><00:32:40.799><c> trans</c>

00:32:41.029 --> 00:32:41.039 align:start position:0%
know that there are spaces where trans
 

00:32:41.039 --> 00:32:42.789 align:start position:0%
know that there are spaces where trans
women<00:32:41.279><c> are</c><00:32:41.519><c> women.</c><00:32:41.840><c> And</c><00:32:42.000><c> we</c><00:32:42.159><c> can</c><00:32:42.320><c> even</c><00:32:42.559><c> draw</c>

00:32:42.789 --> 00:32:42.799 align:start position:0%
women are women. And we can even draw
 

00:32:42.799 --> 00:32:44.710 align:start position:0%
women are women. And we can even draw
out<00:32:43.120><c> Dareda's</c><00:32:43.679><c> webs</c><00:32:44.000><c> of</c><00:32:44.159><c> meaning</c><00:32:44.320><c> for</c><00:32:44.480><c> the</c><00:32:44.640><c> use</c>

00:32:44.710 --> 00:32:44.720 align:start position:0%
out Dareda's webs of meaning for the use
 

00:32:44.720 --> 00:32:46.710 align:start position:0%
out Dareda's webs of meaning for the use
of<00:32:44.880><c> the</c><00:32:44.960><c> word</c><00:32:45.120><c> in</c><00:32:45.279><c> those</c><00:32:45.519><c> communities.</c><00:32:46.159><c> If</c><00:32:46.480><c> by</c>

00:32:46.710 --> 00:32:46.720 align:start position:0%
of the word in those communities. If by
 

00:32:46.720 --> 00:32:48.549 align:start position:0%
of the word in those communities. If by
the<00:32:46.880><c> word</c><00:32:47.120><c> woman,</c><00:32:47.519><c> a</c><00:32:47.760><c> community</c><00:32:48.000><c> is</c><00:32:48.240><c> referring</c>

00:32:48.549 --> 00:32:48.559 align:start position:0%
the word woman, a community is referring
 

00:32:48.559 --> 00:32:49.990 align:start position:0%
the word woman, a community is referring
to<00:32:48.799><c> somebody</c><00:32:49.039><c> who</c><00:32:49.200><c> looks</c><00:32:49.360><c> like</c><00:32:49.440><c> a</c><00:32:49.600><c> woman,</c><00:32:49.840><c> then</c>

00:32:49.990 --> 00:32:50.000 align:start position:0%
to somebody who looks like a woman, then
 

00:32:50.000 --> 00:32:51.430 align:start position:0%
to somebody who looks like a woman, then
a<00:32:50.159><c> lot</c><00:32:50.240><c> of</c><00:32:50.399><c> trans</c><00:32:50.559><c> women</c><00:32:50.799><c> are</c><00:32:50.960><c> women.</c><00:32:51.200><c> if</c>

00:32:51.430 --> 00:32:51.440 align:start position:0%
a lot of trans women are women. if
 

00:32:51.440 --> 00:32:52.630 align:start position:0%
a lot of trans women are women. if
they're<00:32:51.600><c> referring</c><00:32:51.840><c> to</c><00:32:52.000><c> somebody</c><00:32:52.240><c> who</c><00:32:52.480><c> takes</c>

00:32:52.630 --> 00:32:52.640 align:start position:0%
they're referring to somebody who takes
 

00:32:52.640 --> 00:32:54.549 align:start position:0%
they're referring to somebody who takes
on<00:32:52.799><c> a</c><00:32:53.039><c> feminine</c><00:32:53.440><c> social</c><00:32:53.760><c> role</c><00:32:54.080><c> in</c><00:32:54.320><c> their</c>

00:32:54.549 --> 00:32:54.559 align:start position:0%
on a feminine social role in their
 

00:32:54.559 --> 00:32:55.909 align:start position:0%
on a feminine social role in their
relationships<00:32:55.039><c> with</c><00:32:55.279><c> their</c><00:32:55.440><c> partner</c><00:32:55.679><c> and</c>

00:32:55.909 --> 00:32:55.919 align:start position:0%
relationships with their partner and
 

00:32:55.919 --> 00:32:57.430 align:start position:0%
relationships with their partner and
their<00:32:56.080><c> family</c><00:32:56.240><c> and</c><00:32:56.480><c> their</c><00:32:56.640><c> friends.</c><00:32:57.120><c> And</c><00:32:57.200><c> once</c>

00:32:57.430 --> 00:32:57.440 align:start position:0%
their family and their friends. And once
 

00:32:57.440 --> 00:32:59.350 align:start position:0%
their family and their friends. And once
again,<00:32:57.760><c> a</c><00:32:57.919><c> lot</c><00:32:58.000><c> of</c><00:32:58.159><c> trans</c><00:32:58.399><c> women</c><00:32:58.640><c> are</c><00:32:58.880><c> women.</c>

00:32:59.350 --> 00:32:59.360 align:start position:0%
again, a lot of trans women are women.
 

00:32:59.360 --> 00:33:01.350 align:start position:0%
again, a lot of trans women are women.
These<00:32:59.600><c> definitions</c><00:33:00.159><c> necessarily</c><00:33:00.799><c> exclude</c>

00:33:01.350 --> 00:33:01.360 align:start position:0%
These definitions necessarily exclude
 

00:33:01.360 --> 00:33:03.110 align:start position:0%
These definitions necessarily exclude
some<00:33:01.679><c> people</c><00:33:01.919><c> who</c><00:33:02.159><c> claim</c><00:33:02.399><c> to</c><00:33:02.480><c> be</c><00:33:02.640><c> women,</c><00:33:02.960><c> which</c>

00:33:03.110 --> 00:33:03.120 align:start position:0%
some people who claim to be women, which
 

00:33:03.120 --> 00:33:05.110 align:start position:0%
some people who claim to be women, which
is<00:33:03.279><c> why</c><00:33:03.519><c> trans</c><00:33:03.840><c> activists</c><00:33:04.320><c> reject</c><00:33:04.640><c> them.</c><00:33:04.960><c> But</c>

00:33:05.110 --> 00:33:05.120 align:start position:0%
is why trans activists reject them. But
 

00:33:05.120 --> 00:33:07.110 align:start position:0%
is why trans activists reject them. But
nonetheless,<00:33:05.840><c> these</c><00:33:06.159><c> definitions</c><00:33:06.720><c> also</c>

00:33:07.110 --> 00:33:07.120 align:start position:0%
nonetheless, these definitions also
 

00:33:07.120 --> 00:33:09.430 align:start position:0%
nonetheless, these definitions also
better<00:33:07.440><c> reflect</c><00:33:07.840><c> the</c><00:33:08.159><c> actual</c><00:33:08.720><c> realworld</c>

00:33:09.430 --> 00:33:09.440 align:start position:0%
better reflect the actual realworld
 

00:33:09.440 --> 00:33:11.750 align:start position:0%
better reflect the actual realworld
lived<00:33:09.840><c> experiences</c><00:33:10.640><c> of</c><00:33:10.960><c> every</c><00:33:11.360><c> single</c>

00:33:11.750 --> 00:33:11.760 align:start position:0%
lived experiences of every single
 

00:33:11.760 --> 00:33:14.070 align:start position:0%
lived experiences of every single
transwoman<00:33:12.399><c> that</c><00:33:12.720><c> passes</c><00:33:13.120><c> in</c><00:33:13.440><c> stealths</c><00:33:13.919><c> and</c>

00:33:14.070 --> 00:33:14.080 align:start position:0%
transwoman that passes in stealths and
 

00:33:14.080 --> 00:33:15.909 align:start position:0%
transwoman that passes in stealths and
is<00:33:14.240><c> accepted</c><00:33:14.640><c> in</c><00:33:14.880><c> their</c><00:33:15.120><c> world</c><00:33:15.360><c> as</c><00:33:15.519><c> a</c><00:33:15.679><c> woman</c>

00:33:15.909 --> 00:33:15.919 align:start position:0%
is accepted in their world as a woman
 

00:33:15.919 --> 00:33:17.750 align:start position:0%
is accepted in their world as a woman
that<00:33:16.159><c> I</c><00:33:16.399><c> have</c><00:33:16.559><c> ever</c><00:33:16.799><c> actually</c><00:33:17.120><c> met</c><00:33:17.360><c> in</c><00:33:17.519><c> real</c>

00:33:17.750 --> 00:33:17.760 align:start position:0%
that I have ever actually met in real
 

00:33:17.760 --> 00:33:19.990 align:start position:0%
that I have ever actually met in real
life.<00:33:18.399><c> more</c><00:33:18.640><c> so</c><00:33:18.880><c> than</c><00:33:19.039><c> any</c><00:33:19.279><c> of</c><00:33:19.440><c> Niara's</c>

00:33:19.990 --> 00:33:20.000 align:start position:0%
life. more so than any of Niara's
 

00:33:20.000 --> 00:33:22.389 align:start position:0%
life. more so than any of Niara's
terminally<00:33:20.480><c> online</c><00:33:20.960><c> brain</c><00:33:21.279><c> rot</c><00:33:21.600><c> nonsense.</c>

00:33:22.389 --> 00:33:22.399 align:start position:0%
terminally online brain rot nonsense.
 

00:33:22.399 --> 00:33:24.070 align:start position:0%
terminally online brain rot nonsense.
And<00:33:22.559><c> of</c><00:33:22.720><c> course,</c><00:33:22.960><c> we</c><00:33:23.200><c> all</c><00:33:23.519><c> know</c><00:33:23.760><c> this</c>

00:33:24.070 --> 00:33:24.080 align:start position:0%
And of course, we all know this
 

00:33:24.080 --> 00:33:26.789 align:start position:0%
And of course, we all know this
intuitively.<00:33:24.960><c> Taftage's</c><00:33:25.760><c> claim</c><00:33:26.080><c> of</c><00:33:26.320><c> I</c><00:33:26.559><c> am</c><00:33:26.640><c> a</c>

00:33:26.789 --> 00:33:26.799 align:start position:0%
intuitively. Taftage's claim of I am a
 

00:33:26.799 --> 00:33:28.950 align:start position:0%
intuitively. Taftage's claim of I am a
woman<00:33:27.120><c> is</c><00:33:27.440><c> far</c><00:33:27.840><c> stronger</c><00:33:28.320><c> than</c><00:33:28.480><c> the</c><00:33:28.720><c> same</c>

00:33:28.950 --> 00:33:28.960 align:start position:0%
woman is far stronger than the same
 

00:33:28.960 --> 00:33:31.750 align:start position:0%
woman is far stronger than the same
claim<00:33:29.279><c> voiced</c><00:33:29.679><c> by</c><00:33:29.760><c> a</c><00:33:29.919><c> balding,</c><00:33:30.640><c> bearded</c><00:33:31.200><c> 7-ft</c>

00:33:31.750 --> 00:33:31.760 align:start position:0%
claim voiced by a balding, bearded 7-ft
 

00:33:31.760 --> 00:33:33.830 align:start position:0%
claim voiced by a balding, bearded 7-ft
tall<00:33:32.080><c> gigahon</c><00:33:32.799><c> who</c><00:33:32.960><c> doesn't</c><00:33:33.200><c> have</c><00:33:33.360><c> a</c><00:33:33.600><c> single</c>

00:33:33.830 --> 00:33:33.840 align:start position:0%
tall gigahon who doesn't have a single
 

00:33:33.840 --> 00:33:35.430 align:start position:0%
tall gigahon who doesn't have a single
drop<00:33:34.080><c> of</c><00:33:34.240><c> femininity</c><00:33:34.640><c> in</c><00:33:34.880><c> them.</c><00:33:35.120><c> And</c><00:33:35.200><c> if</c><00:33:35.360><c> you</c>

00:33:35.430 --> 00:33:35.440 align:start position:0%
drop of femininity in them. And if you
 

00:33:35.440 --> 00:33:36.710 align:start position:0%
drop of femininity in them. And if you
don't<00:33:35.600><c> agree</c><00:33:35.760><c> with</c><00:33:35.919><c> me,</c><00:33:36.080><c> if</c><00:33:36.240><c> you</c><00:33:36.399><c> think</c><00:33:36.480><c> these</c>

00:33:36.710 --> 00:33:36.720 align:start position:0%
don't agree with me, if you think these
 

00:33:36.720 --> 00:33:38.149 align:start position:0%
don't agree with me, if you think these
two<00:33:36.880><c> people</c><00:33:37.039><c> are</c><00:33:37.200><c> the</c><00:33:37.440><c> same,</c><00:33:37.679><c> then</c><00:33:37.840><c> you</c><00:33:38.000><c> have</c>

00:33:38.149 --> 00:33:38.159 align:start position:0%
two people are the same, then you have
 

00:33:38.159 --> 00:33:39.830 align:start position:0%
two people are the same, then you have
to<00:33:38.240><c> either</c><00:33:38.559><c> be</c><00:33:38.720><c> blind</c><00:33:39.039><c> or</c><00:33:39.279><c> you're</c><00:33:39.519><c> denying</c>

00:33:39.830 --> 00:33:39.840 align:start position:0%
to either be blind or you're denying
 

00:33:39.840 --> 00:33:41.350 align:start position:0%
to either be blind or you're denying
what<00:33:40.000><c> your</c><00:33:40.159><c> eyes</c><00:33:40.399><c> are</c><00:33:40.640><c> seeing</c><00:33:40.960><c> for</c><00:33:41.200><c> some</c>

00:33:41.350 --> 00:33:41.360 align:start position:0%
what your eyes are seeing for some
 

00:33:41.360 --> 00:33:43.430 align:start position:0%
what your eyes are seeing for some
ideological<00:33:42.080><c> purpose.</c><00:33:42.640><c> By</c><00:33:42.799><c> the</c><00:33:42.880><c> way,</c><00:33:43.120><c> another</c>

00:33:43.430 --> 00:33:43.440 align:start position:0%
ideological purpose. By the way, another
 

00:33:43.440 --> 00:33:44.470 align:start position:0%
ideological purpose. By the way, another
big<00:33:43.600><c> reason</c><00:33:43.679><c> as</c><00:33:43.919><c> to</c><00:33:44.000><c> why</c><00:33:44.159><c> this</c><00:33:44.320><c> whole</c>

00:33:44.470 --> 00:33:44.480 align:start position:0%
big reason as to why this whole
 

00:33:44.480 --> 00:33:46.070 align:start position:0%
big reason as to why this whole
discourse<00:33:44.960><c> blew</c><00:33:45.200><c> up</c><00:33:45.279><c> on</c><00:33:45.440><c> Twitter</c><00:33:45.679><c> is</c><00:33:45.919><c> because</c>

00:33:46.070 --> 00:33:46.080 align:start position:0%
discourse blew up on Twitter is because
 

00:33:46.080 --> 00:33:47.590 align:start position:0%
discourse blew up on Twitter is because
I<00:33:46.240><c> said</c><00:33:46.399><c> this</c><00:33:46.640><c> exact</c><00:33:46.880><c> same</c><00:33:47.039><c> thing</c><00:33:47.200><c> in</c><00:33:47.440><c> one</c><00:33:47.519><c> of</c>

00:33:47.590 --> 00:33:47.600 align:start position:0%
I said this exact same thing in one of
 

00:33:47.600 --> 00:33:49.669 align:start position:0%
I said this exact same thing in one of
the<00:33:47.760><c> replies.</c><00:33:48.320><c> And</c><00:33:48.480><c> a</c><00:33:48.640><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:33:48.960><c> ton</c><00:33:49.120><c> of</c><00:33:49.360><c> trans</c>

00:33:49.669 --> 00:33:49.679 align:start position:0%
the replies. And a [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] ton of trans
 

00:33:49.679 --> 00:33:51.590 align:start position:0%
the replies. And a [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] ton of trans
activists<00:33:50.240><c> also</c><00:33:50.559><c> got</c><00:33:50.799><c> really</c><00:33:51.039><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:33:51.360><c> angry</c>

00:33:51.590 --> 00:33:51.600 align:start position:0%
activists also got really [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] angry
 

00:33:51.600 --> 00:33:53.750 align:start position:0%
activists also got really [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] angry
at<00:33:51.760><c> me</c><00:33:51.919><c> over</c><00:33:52.240><c> my</c><00:33:52.399><c> use</c><00:33:52.559><c> of</c><00:33:52.640><c> the</c><00:33:52.799><c> word</c><00:33:52.960><c> gigahon.</c>

00:33:53.750 --> 00:33:53.760 align:start position:0%
at me over my use of the word gigahon.
 

00:33:53.760 --> 00:33:55.190 align:start position:0%
at me over my use of the word gigahon.
Not<00:33:53.919><c> because</c><00:33:54.080><c> it's</c><00:33:54.240><c> a</c><00:33:54.399><c> slur,</c><00:33:54.799><c> but</c><00:33:54.960><c> because</c>

00:33:55.190 --> 00:33:55.200 align:start position:0%
Not because it's a slur, but because
 

00:33:55.200 --> 00:33:56.950 align:start position:0%
Not because it's a slur, but because
it's<00:33:55.440><c> a</c><00:33:55.600><c> part</c><00:33:55.760><c> of</c><00:33:55.919><c> the</c><00:33:56.080><c> online</c><00:33:56.559><c> trans</c>

00:33:56.950 --> 00:33:56.960 align:start position:0%
it's a part of the online trans
 

00:33:56.960 --> 00:33:58.630 align:start position:0%
it's a part of the online trans
community's<00:33:57.440><c> private</c><00:33:57.760><c> language</c><00:33:58.159><c> that</c><00:33:58.399><c> they</c>

00:33:58.630 --> 00:33:58.640 align:start position:0%
community's private language that they
 

00:33:58.640 --> 00:34:00.549 align:start position:0%
community's private language that they
believe<00:33:58.880><c> that</c><00:33:59.120><c> I,</c><00:33:59.360><c> as</c><00:33:59.519><c> a</c><00:33:59.679><c> sis</c><00:33:59.919><c> person,</c><00:34:00.320><c> really</c>

00:34:00.549 --> 00:34:00.559 align:start position:0%
believe that I, as a sis person, really
 

00:34:00.559 --> 00:34:02.549 align:start position:0%
believe that I, as a sis person, really
shouldn't<00:34:00.880><c> know</c><00:34:01.039><c> about.</c><00:34:01.600><c> Ultimately,</c><00:34:02.240><c> my</c>

00:34:02.549 --> 00:34:02.559 align:start position:0%
shouldn't know about. Ultimately, my
 

00:34:02.559 --> 00:34:04.310 align:start position:0%
shouldn't know about. Ultimately, my
answer<00:34:02.799><c> to</c><00:34:02.960><c> the</c><00:34:03.200><c> question,</c><00:34:03.519><c> are</c><00:34:03.760><c> trans</c><00:34:04.000><c> women</c>

00:34:04.310 --> 00:34:04.320 align:start position:0%
answer to the question, are trans women
 

00:34:04.320 --> 00:34:06.070 align:start position:0%
answer to the question, are trans women
actually<00:34:04.640><c> women?</c><00:34:05.120><c> Is,</c><00:34:05.360><c> do</c><00:34:05.519><c> they</c><00:34:05.679><c> look</c><00:34:05.919><c> like</c>

00:34:06.070 --> 00:34:06.080 align:start position:0%
actually women? Is, do they look like
 

00:34:06.080 --> 00:34:08.710 align:start position:0%
actually women? Is, do they look like
women?<00:34:06.559><c> If</c><00:34:06.799><c> yes,</c><00:34:07.200><c> then</c><00:34:07.440><c> yes.</c><00:34:08.000><c> And</c><00:34:08.240><c> that</c><00:34:08.399><c> means</c>

00:34:08.710 --> 00:34:08.720 align:start position:0%
women? If yes, then yes. And that means
 

00:34:08.720 --> 00:34:10.310 align:start position:0%
women? If yes, then yes. And that means
to<00:34:08.879><c> the</c><00:34:09.040><c> terminally</c><00:34:09.520><c> online</c><00:34:09.919><c> trans</c>

00:34:10.310 --> 00:34:10.320 align:start position:0%
to the terminally online trans
 

00:34:10.320 --> 00:34:12.550 align:start position:0%
to the terminally online trans
community,<00:34:10.800><c> I</c><00:34:11.040><c> am</c><00:34:11.200><c> highly</c><00:34:11.599><c> transphobic.</c><00:34:12.399><c> Even</c>

00:34:12.550 --> 00:34:12.560 align:start position:0%
community, I am highly transphobic. Even
 

00:34:12.560 --> 00:34:14.869 align:start position:0%
community, I am highly transphobic. Even
though<00:34:12.720><c> I</c><00:34:12.879><c> support</c><00:34:13.200><c> a</c><00:34:13.520><c> ton</c><00:34:13.839><c> of</c><00:34:14.159><c> protrans</c>

00:34:14.869 --> 00:34:14.879 align:start position:0%
though I support a ton of protrans
 

00:34:14.879 --> 00:34:16.470 align:start position:0%
though I support a ton of protrans
policy<00:34:15.280><c> prescriptions</c><00:34:15.679><c> in</c><00:34:15.919><c> government</c>

00:34:16.470 --> 00:34:16.480 align:start position:0%
policy prescriptions in government
 

00:34:16.480 --> 00:34:18.470 align:start position:0%
policy prescriptions in government
because<00:34:16.720><c> what</c><00:34:16.960><c> it</c><00:34:17.200><c> means</c><00:34:17.440><c> is</c><00:34:17.679><c> that</c><00:34:17.919><c> I</c><00:34:18.159><c> respect</c>

00:34:18.470 --> 00:34:18.480 align:start position:0%
because what it means is that I respect
 

00:34:18.480 --> 00:34:20.470 align:start position:0%
because what it means is that I respect
the<00:34:18.800><c> identity</c><00:34:19.040><c> of</c><00:34:19.119><c> a</c><00:34:19.359><c> trans</c><00:34:19.599><c> woman</c><00:34:19.919><c> only</c><00:34:20.240><c> if</c>

00:34:20.470 --> 00:34:20.480 align:start position:0%
the identity of a trans woman only if
 

00:34:20.480 --> 00:34:21.990 align:start position:0%
the identity of a trans woman only if
they<00:34:20.720><c> pass</c><00:34:20.960><c> well</c><00:34:21.200><c> enough</c><00:34:21.359><c> for</c><00:34:21.520><c> my</c><00:34:21.599><c> intuition</c>

00:34:21.990 --> 00:34:22.000 align:start position:0%
they pass well enough for my intuition
 

00:34:22.000 --> 00:34:23.510 align:start position:0%
they pass well enough for my intuition
to<00:34:22.079><c> see</c><00:34:22.240><c> them</c><00:34:22.399><c> as</c><00:34:22.560><c> women.</c><00:34:22.879><c> And</c><00:34:23.040><c> my</c><00:34:23.200><c> response</c><00:34:23.359><c> to</c>

00:34:23.510 --> 00:34:23.520 align:start position:0%
to see them as women. And my response to
 

00:34:23.520 --> 00:34:26.149 align:start position:0%
to see them as women. And my response to
that<00:34:23.760><c> is,</c><00:34:24.159><c> well,</c><00:34:24.560><c> too</c><00:34:24.800><c> bad.</c><00:34:25.359><c> Yeah,</c><00:34:25.679><c> it</c><00:34:25.919><c> kind</c><00:34:26.000><c> of</c>

00:34:26.149 --> 00:34:26.159 align:start position:0%
that is, well, too bad. Yeah, it kind of
 

00:34:26.159 --> 00:34:28.149 align:start position:0%
that is, well, too bad. Yeah, it kind of
sucks.<00:34:26.639><c> But</c><00:34:26.800><c> guess</c><00:34:27.040><c> what?</c><00:34:27.440><c> None</c><00:34:27.679><c> of</c><00:34:27.760><c> us</c><00:34:27.919><c> are</c>

00:34:28.149 --> 00:34:28.159 align:start position:0%
sucks. But guess what? None of us are
 

00:34:28.159 --> 00:34:30.790 align:start position:0%
sucks. But guess what? None of us are
actually<00:34:28.560><c> fully</c><00:34:29.040><c> self-authored</c><00:34:29.839><c> beings.</c><00:34:30.560><c> We</c>

00:34:30.790 --> 00:34:30.800 align:start position:0%
actually fully self-authored beings. We
 

00:34:30.800 --> 00:34:32.869 align:start position:0%
actually fully self-authored beings. We
are<00:34:30.960><c> not</c><00:34:31.119><c> what</c><00:34:31.280><c> we</c><00:34:31.520><c> say</c><00:34:31.679><c> we</c><00:34:32.000><c> are</c><00:34:32.240><c> simply</c><00:34:32.560><c> by</c>

00:34:32.869 --> 00:34:32.879 align:start position:0%
are not what we say we are simply by
 

00:34:32.879 --> 00:34:35.270 align:start position:0%
are not what we say we are simply by
will<00:34:33.200><c> alone.</c><00:34:33.839><c> For</c><00:34:33.919><c> example,</c><00:34:34.399><c> I'm</c><00:34:34.639><c> a</c><00:34:34.800><c> fat</c><00:34:35.040><c> guy.</c>

00:34:35.270 --> 00:34:35.280 align:start position:0%
will alone. For example, I'm a fat guy.
 

00:34:35.280 --> 00:34:37.669 align:start position:0%
will alone. For example, I'm a fat guy.
I<00:34:35.520><c> am</c><00:34:35.679><c> not</c><00:34:35.839><c> a</c><00:34:36.000><c> thin,</c><00:34:36.320><c> muscular</c><00:34:36.800><c> guy.</c><00:34:37.200><c> I</c><00:34:37.520><c> could</c>

00:34:37.669 --> 00:34:37.679 align:start position:0%
I am not a thin, muscular guy. I could
 

00:34:37.679 --> 00:34:39.589 align:start position:0%
I am not a thin, muscular guy. I could
become<00:34:38.079><c> a</c><00:34:38.240><c> thin</c><00:34:38.560><c> muscular</c><00:34:38.960><c> guy</c><00:34:39.119><c> with</c><00:34:39.280><c> a</c><00:34:39.359><c> lot</c><00:34:39.440><c> of</c>

00:34:39.589 --> 00:34:39.599 align:start position:0%
become a thin muscular guy with a lot of
 

00:34:39.599 --> 00:34:41.349 align:start position:0%
become a thin muscular guy with a lot of
hard<00:34:39.760><c> work.</c><00:34:40.000><c> But</c><00:34:40.159><c> if</c><00:34:40.320><c> I</c><00:34:40.560><c> identified</c><00:34:40.879><c> as</c><00:34:41.040><c> a</c><00:34:41.119><c> thin</c>

00:34:41.349 --> 00:34:41.359 align:start position:0%
hard work. But if I identified as a thin
 

00:34:41.359 --> 00:34:43.510 align:start position:0%
hard work. But if I identified as a thin
muscular<00:34:41.839><c> guy</c><00:34:42.079><c> and</c><00:34:42.320><c> did</c><00:34:42.560><c> nothing</c><00:34:42.800><c> else,</c><00:34:43.280><c> that</c>

00:34:43.510 --> 00:34:43.520 align:start position:0%
muscular guy and did nothing else, that
 

00:34:43.520 --> 00:34:45.669 align:start position:0%
muscular guy and did nothing else, that
would<00:34:43.679><c> not</c><00:34:43.919><c> make</c><00:34:44.159><c> me</c><00:34:44.320><c> one.</c><00:34:44.879><c> Some</c><00:34:45.119><c> people</c><00:34:45.440><c> are</c>

00:34:45.669 --> 00:34:45.679 align:start position:0%
would not make me one. Some people are
 

00:34:45.679 --> 00:34:47.990 align:start position:0%
would not make me one. Some people are
born<00:34:46.000><c> women.</c><00:34:46.399><c> Others,</c><00:34:46.800><c> like</c><00:34:46.960><c> Taftage,</c><00:34:47.679><c> become</c>

00:34:47.990 --> 00:34:48.000 align:start position:0%
born women. Others, like Taftage, become
 

00:34:48.000 --> 00:34:49.990 align:start position:0%
born women. Others, like Taftage, become
women<00:34:48.320><c> through</c><00:34:48.480><c> a</c><00:34:48.720><c> lot</c><00:34:48.800><c> of</c><00:34:49.040><c> hard</c><00:34:49.280><c> work.</c><00:34:49.679><c> I</c><00:34:49.839><c> know</c>

00:34:49.990 --> 00:34:50.000 align:start position:0%
women through a lot of hard work. I know
 

00:34:50.000 --> 00:34:51.510 align:start position:0%
women through a lot of hard work. I know
for<00:34:50.159><c> a</c><00:34:50.320><c> fact</c><00:34:50.480><c> she</c><00:34:50.720><c> suffered</c><00:34:50.960><c> to</c><00:34:51.040><c> get</c><00:34:51.200><c> where</c><00:34:51.359><c> she</c>

00:34:51.510 --> 00:34:51.520 align:start position:0%
for a fact she suffered to get where she
 

00:34:51.520 --> 00:34:53.030 align:start position:0%
for a fact she suffered to get where she
is<00:34:51.679><c> now.</c><00:34:52.000><c> And</c><00:34:52.159><c> good</c><00:34:52.399><c> on</c><00:34:52.480><c> her,</c><00:34:52.639><c> because</c><00:34:52.800><c> that</c>

00:34:53.030 --> 00:34:53.040 align:start position:0%
is now. And good on her, because that
 

00:34:53.040 --> 00:34:54.950 align:start position:0%
is now. And good on her, because that
takes<00:34:53.200><c> real</c><00:34:53.440><c> dedication.</c><00:34:54.159><c> But</c><00:34:54.399><c> not</c><00:34:54.639><c> everybody</c>

00:34:54.950 --> 00:34:54.960 align:start position:0%
takes real dedication. But not everybody
 

00:34:54.960 --> 00:34:56.389 align:start position:0%
takes real dedication. But not everybody
gets<00:34:55.200><c> to</c><00:34:55.359><c> be</c><00:34:55.520><c> everything</c><00:34:55.839><c> they</c><00:34:56.079><c> actually</c><00:34:56.320><c> want</c>

00:34:56.389 --> 00:34:56.399 align:start position:0%
gets to be everything they actually want
 

00:34:56.399 --> 00:34:58.310 align:start position:0%
gets to be everything they actually want
to<00:34:56.560><c> be.</c><00:34:56.960><c> That</c><00:34:57.119><c> is</c><00:34:57.280><c> the</c><00:34:57.440><c> harsh</c><00:34:57.760><c> reality</c><00:34:58.000><c> of</c><00:34:58.160><c> the</c>

00:34:58.310 --> 00:34:58.320 align:start position:0%
to be. That is the harsh reality of the
 

00:34:58.320 --> 00:35:00.390 align:start position:0%
to be. That is the harsh reality of the
real<00:34:58.560><c> world.</c><00:34:59.040><c> In</c><00:34:59.280><c> fact,</c><00:34:59.599><c> I'd</c><00:34:59.920><c> say</c><00:35:00.000><c> that</c><00:35:00.240><c> each</c>

00:35:00.390 --> 00:35:00.400 align:start position:0%
real world. In fact, I'd say that each
 

00:35:00.400 --> 00:35:02.550 align:start position:0%
real world. In fact, I'd say that each
of<00:35:00.560><c> us</c><00:35:00.720><c> have</c><00:35:00.960><c> some</c><00:35:01.280><c> internal</c><00:35:01.760><c> qualities</c><00:35:02.320><c> that</c>

00:35:02.550 --> 00:35:02.560 align:start position:0%
of us have some internal qualities that
 

00:35:02.560 --> 00:35:04.230 align:start position:0%
of us have some internal qualities that
we<00:35:02.800><c> never</c><00:35:03.040><c> actually</c><00:35:03.280><c> get</c><00:35:03.440><c> to</c><00:35:03.599><c> become</c><00:35:04.000><c> because</c>

00:35:04.230 --> 00:35:04.240 align:start position:0%
we never actually get to become because
 

00:35:04.240 --> 00:35:06.069 align:start position:0%
we never actually get to become because
the<00:35:04.480><c> objective</c><00:35:04.960><c> reality</c><00:35:05.359><c> outside</c><00:35:05.760><c> of</c><00:35:05.839><c> your</c>

00:35:06.069 --> 00:35:06.079 align:start position:0%
the objective reality outside of your
 

00:35:06.079 --> 00:35:08.390 align:start position:0%
the objective reality outside of your
own<00:35:06.240><c> self-perception</c><00:35:07.040><c> also</c><00:35:07.440><c> matters</c><00:35:07.839><c> a</c><00:35:08.079><c> lot.</c>

00:35:08.390 --> 00:35:08.400 align:start position:0%
own self-perception also matters a lot.
 

00:35:08.400 --> 00:35:09.750 align:start position:0%
own self-perception also matters a lot.
And<00:35:08.640><c> any</c><00:35:08.880><c> trans</c><00:35:09.119><c> activists</c><00:35:09.520><c> who</c><00:35:09.680><c> are</c>

00:35:09.750 --> 00:35:09.760 align:start position:0%
And any trans activists who are
 

00:35:09.760 --> 00:35:10.950 align:start position:0%
And any trans activists who are
currently<00:35:10.079><c> listening,</c><00:35:10.400><c> if</c><00:35:10.560><c> this</c><00:35:10.720><c> sounds</c>

00:35:10.950 --> 00:35:10.960 align:start position:0%
currently listening, if this sounds
 

00:35:10.960 --> 00:35:12.790 align:start position:0%
currently listening, if this sounds
transphobic,<00:35:11.839><c> you</c><00:35:12.079><c> know</c><00:35:12.240><c> you</c><00:35:12.480><c> ultimately</c>

00:35:12.790 --> 00:35:12.800 align:start position:0%
transphobic, you know you ultimately
 

00:35:12.800 --> 00:35:14.310 align:start position:0%
transphobic, you know you ultimately
agree<00:35:13.040><c> with</c><00:35:13.200><c> me.</c><00:35:13.440><c> It's</c><00:35:13.599><c> a</c><00:35:13.760><c> big</c><00:35:13.920><c> part</c><00:35:14.079><c> of</c><00:35:14.160><c> why</c>

00:35:14.310 --> 00:35:14.320 align:start position:0%
agree with me. It's a big part of why
 

00:35:14.320 --> 00:35:15.829 align:start position:0%
agree with me. It's a big part of why
you<00:35:14.480><c> transitioned</c><00:35:14.880><c> in</c><00:35:15.040><c> the</c><00:35:15.119><c> first</c><00:35:15.280><c> place.</c>

00:35:15.829 --> 00:35:15.839 align:start position:0%
you transitioned in the first place.
 

00:35:15.839 --> 00:35:18.069 align:start position:0%
you transitioned in the first place.
This<00:35:16.079><c> is</c><00:35:16.320><c> why</c><00:35:16.560><c> my</c><00:35:16.880><c> original</c><00:35:17.280><c> tweet</c><00:35:17.520><c> is</c><00:35:17.760><c> worded</c>

00:35:18.069 --> 00:35:18.079 align:start position:0%
This is why my original tweet is worded
 

00:35:18.079 --> 00:35:19.750 align:start position:0%
This is why my original tweet is worded
the<00:35:18.240><c> way</c><00:35:18.320><c> it</c><00:35:18.480><c> is.</c><00:35:18.800><c> With</c><00:35:19.040><c> regards</c><00:35:19.359><c> to</c><00:35:19.440><c> the</c><00:35:19.599><c> first</c>

00:35:19.750 --> 00:35:19.760 align:start position:0%
the way it is. With regards to the first
 

00:35:19.760 --> 00:35:21.750 align:start position:0%
the way it is. With regards to the first
half,<00:35:20.240><c> trans</c><00:35:20.480><c> women</c><00:35:20.720><c> aren't</c><00:35:21.040><c> female.</c><00:35:21.520><c> Some</c>

00:35:21.750 --> 00:35:21.760 align:start position:0%
half, trans women aren't female. Some
 

00:35:21.760 --> 00:35:23.430 align:start position:0%
half, trans women aren't female. Some
trans<00:35:22.000><c> women</c><00:35:22.320><c> are</c><00:35:22.480><c> women.</c><00:35:22.880><c> Trans</c><00:35:23.119><c> women</c><00:35:23.280><c> are</c>

00:35:23.430 --> 00:35:23.440 align:start position:0%
trans women are women. Trans women are
 

00:35:23.440 --> 00:35:24.790 align:start position:0%
trans women are women. Trans women are
women<00:35:23.599><c> if</c><00:35:23.760><c> they</c><00:35:23.920><c> pass</c><00:35:24.079><c> enough.</c><00:35:24.480><c> And</c><00:35:24.640><c> that</c>

00:35:24.790 --> 00:35:24.800 align:start position:0%
women if they pass enough. And that
 

00:35:24.800 --> 00:35:26.069 align:start position:0%
women if they pass enough. And that
means<00:35:25.119><c> some</c><00:35:25.359><c> people</c><00:35:25.520><c> just</c><00:35:25.680><c> aren't</c><00:35:25.920><c> going</c><00:35:26.000><c> to</c>

00:35:26.069 --> 00:35:26.079 align:start position:0%
means some people just aren't going to
 

00:35:26.079 --> 00:35:27.430 align:start position:0%
means some people just aren't going to
make<00:35:26.160><c> it.</c><00:35:26.400><c> And</c><00:35:26.560><c> that</c><00:35:26.720><c> sucks.</c><00:35:26.960><c> I</c><00:35:27.119><c> feel</c><00:35:27.280><c> for</c>

00:35:27.430 --> 00:35:27.440 align:start position:0%
make it. And that sucks. I feel for
 

00:35:27.440 --> 00:35:28.950 align:start position:0%
make it. And that sucks. I feel for
them,<00:35:27.520><c> but</c><00:35:27.760><c> that's</c><00:35:27.920><c> life.</c><00:35:28.480><c> Not</c><00:35:28.640><c> everyone</c>

00:35:28.950 --> 00:35:28.960 align:start position:0%
them, but that's life. Not everyone
 

00:35:28.960 --> 00:35:30.630 align:start position:0%
them, but that's life. Not everyone
makes<00:35:29.119><c> it.</c><00:35:29.359><c> And</c><00:35:29.599><c> with</c><00:35:29.760><c> regards</c><00:35:30.079><c> to</c><00:35:30.240><c> the</c><00:35:30.400><c> second</c>

00:35:30.630 --> 00:35:30.640 align:start position:0%
makes it. And with regards to the second
 

00:35:30.640 --> 00:35:32.870 align:start position:0%
makes it. And with regards to the second
half,<00:35:31.200><c> even</c><00:35:31.440><c> if</c><00:35:31.680><c> you</c><00:35:31.920><c> don't</c><00:35:32.079><c> think</c><00:35:32.240><c> a</c><00:35:32.560><c> specific</c>

00:35:32.870 --> 00:35:32.880 align:start position:0%
half, even if you don't think a specific
 

00:35:32.880 --> 00:35:34.470 align:start position:0%
half, even if you don't think a specific
trans<00:35:33.200><c> woman</c><00:35:33.440><c> is</c><00:35:33.599><c> a</c><00:35:33.760><c> woman,</c><00:35:34.000><c> you</c><00:35:34.160><c> have</c><00:35:34.240><c> a</c><00:35:34.400><c> right</c>

00:35:34.470 --> 00:35:34.480 align:start position:0%
trans woman is a woman, you have a right
 

00:35:34.480 --> 00:35:35.589 align:start position:0%
trans woman is a woman, you have a right
to<00:35:34.640><c> that</c><00:35:34.800><c> opinion.</c><00:35:35.119><c> Even</c><00:35:35.200><c> if</c><00:35:35.359><c> I</c><00:35:35.520><c> might</c>

00:35:35.589 --> 00:35:35.599 align:start position:0%
to that opinion. Even if I might
 

00:35:35.599 --> 00:35:36.950 align:start position:0%
to that opinion. Even if I might
disagree,<00:35:36.079><c> like</c><00:35:36.240><c> to</c><00:35:36.400><c> go</c><00:35:36.480><c> back</c><00:35:36.640><c> to</c><00:35:36.720><c> our</c>

00:35:36.950 --> 00:35:36.960 align:start position:0%
disagree, like to go back to our
 

00:35:36.960 --> 00:35:38.630 align:start position:0%
disagree, like to go back to our
example,<00:35:37.200><c> if</c><00:35:37.359><c> you</c><00:35:37.440><c> look</c><00:35:37.520><c> at</c><00:35:37.599><c> Taftage</c><00:35:38.240><c> and</c><00:35:38.480><c> say,</c>

00:35:38.630 --> 00:35:38.640 align:start position:0%
example, if you look at Taftage and say,
 

00:35:38.640 --> 00:35:40.230 align:start position:0%
example, if you look at Taftage and say,
"Nah,<00:35:39.040><c> bro.</c><00:35:39.280><c> It</c><00:35:39.359><c> looks</c><00:35:39.520><c> like</c><00:35:39.599><c> a</c><00:35:39.760><c> dude.</c><00:35:40.000><c> You're</c>

00:35:40.230 --> 00:35:40.240 align:start position:0%
"Nah, bro. It looks like a dude. You're
 

00:35:40.240 --> 00:35:41.829 align:start position:0%
"Nah, bro. It looks like a dude. You're
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;]<00:35:40.480><c> delusional."</c><00:35:41.119><c> But</c><00:35:41.280><c> okay,</c><00:35:41.680><c> you've</c>

00:35:41.829 --> 00:35:41.839 align:start position:0%
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;] delusional." But okay, you've
 

00:35:41.839 --> 00:35:43.349 align:start position:0%
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;] delusional." But okay, you've
got<00:35:41.920><c> a</c><00:35:42.000><c> right</c><00:35:42.160><c> to</c><00:35:42.240><c> be</c><00:35:42.320><c> delusional.</c><00:35:42.880><c> But</c><00:35:43.040><c> when</c><00:35:43.200><c> I</c>

00:35:43.349 --> 00:35:43.359 align:start position:0%
got a right to be delusional. But when I
 

00:35:43.359 --> 00:35:45.109 align:start position:0%
got a right to be delusional. But when I
said<00:35:43.520><c> you</c><00:35:43.760><c> have</c><00:35:43.839><c> to</c><00:35:44.000><c> leave</c><00:35:44.160><c> them</c><00:35:44.320><c> alone,</c><00:35:44.880><c> yeah,</c>

00:35:45.109 --> 00:35:45.119 align:start position:0%
said you have to leave them alone, yeah,
 

00:35:45.119 --> 00:35:47.510 align:start position:0%
said you have to leave them alone, yeah,
you<00:35:45.440><c> actually</c><00:35:45.760><c> do.</c><00:35:46.320><c> You</c><00:35:46.560><c> should</c><00:35:46.720><c> not</c><00:35:47.040><c> harass</c>

00:35:47.510 --> 00:35:47.520 align:start position:0%
you actually do. You should not harass
 

00:35:47.520 --> 00:35:49.829 align:start position:0%
you actually do. You should not harass
trans<00:35:47.839><c> women,</c><00:35:48.240><c> even</c><00:35:48.560><c> non-passing</c><00:35:49.520><c> trans</c>

00:35:49.829 --> 00:35:49.839 align:start position:0%
trans women, even non-passing trans
 

00:35:49.839 --> 00:35:51.670 align:start position:0%
trans women, even non-passing trans
women,<00:35:50.160><c> if</c><00:35:50.320><c> you</c><00:35:50.480><c> notice</c><00:35:50.800><c> them,</c><00:35:51.040><c> say,</c><00:35:51.359><c> walking</c>

00:35:51.670 --> 00:35:51.680 align:start position:0%
women, if you notice them, say, walking
 

00:35:51.680 --> 00:35:53.510 align:start position:0%
women, if you notice them, say, walking
down<00:35:51.839><c> the</c><00:35:52.079><c> street.</c><00:35:52.560><c> This</c><00:35:52.720><c> is</c><00:35:52.800><c> a</c><00:35:52.960><c> bad</c><00:35:53.200><c> thing</c><00:35:53.359><c> to</c>

00:35:53.510 --> 00:35:53.520 align:start position:0%
down the street. This is a bad thing to
 

00:35:53.520 --> 00:35:55.270 align:start position:0%
down the street. This is a bad thing to
do.<00:35:53.839><c> And</c><00:35:54.000><c> there</c><00:35:54.240><c> should</c><00:35:54.400><c> be</c><00:35:54.640><c> appropriate</c>

00:35:55.270 --> 00:35:55.280 align:start position:0%
do. And there should be appropriate
 

00:35:55.280 --> 00:35:57.750 align:start position:0%
do. And there should be appropriate
social<00:35:55.760><c> and</c><00:35:56.160><c> legal</c><00:35:56.480><c> punishments</c><00:35:57.040><c> in</c><00:35:57.280><c> place</c>

00:35:57.750 --> 00:35:57.760 align:start position:0%
social and legal punishments in place
 

00:35:57.760 --> 00:35:59.190 align:start position:0%
social and legal punishments in place
depending<00:35:58.079><c> on</c><00:35:58.240><c> the</c><00:35:58.400><c> severity</c><00:35:58.800><c> of</c><00:35:58.960><c> your</c>

00:35:59.190 --> 00:35:59.200 align:start position:0%
depending on the severity of your
 

00:35:59.200 --> 00:36:01.430 align:start position:0%
depending on the severity of your
harassment.<00:36:00.079><c> You</c><00:36:00.240><c> should</c><00:36:00.400><c> not</c><00:36:00.640><c> be</c><00:36:00.880><c> forced</c><00:36:01.280><c> by</c>

00:36:01.430 --> 00:36:01.440 align:start position:0%
harassment. You should not be forced by
 

00:36:01.440 --> 00:36:03.430 align:start position:0%
harassment. You should not be forced by
the<00:36:01.599><c> state</c><00:36:01.839><c> to</c><00:36:02.079><c> accept</c><00:36:02.400><c> me</c><00:36:02.480><c> as</c><00:36:02.720><c> women,</c><00:36:02.960><c> but</c><00:36:03.200><c> you</c>

00:36:03.430 --> 00:36:03.440 align:start position:0%
the state to accept me as women, but you
 

00:36:03.440 --> 00:36:05.030 align:start position:0%
the state to accept me as women, but you
should<00:36:03.599><c> be</c><00:36:03.760><c> prevented</c><00:36:04.160><c> by</c><00:36:04.320><c> the</c><00:36:04.480><c> state</c><00:36:04.800><c> from</c>

00:36:05.030 --> 00:36:05.040 align:start position:0%
should be prevented by the state from
 

00:36:05.040 --> 00:36:07.030 align:start position:0%
should be prevented by the state from
harassing<00:36:05.440><c> them</c><00:36:05.680><c> for</c><00:36:05.920><c> simply</c><00:36:06.240><c> existing</c><00:36:06.640><c> in</c><00:36:06.800><c> a</c>

00:36:07.030 --> 00:36:07.040 align:start position:0%
harassing them for simply existing in a
 

00:36:07.040 --> 00:36:08.950 align:start position:0%
harassing them for simply existing in a
public<00:36:07.280><c> place</c><00:36:07.599><c> and</c><00:36:07.839><c> doing</c><00:36:08.079><c> nothing</c><00:36:08.400><c> wrong.</c>

00:36:08.950 --> 00:36:08.960 align:start position:0%
public place and doing nothing wrong.
 

00:36:08.960 --> 00:36:11.109 align:start position:0%
public place and doing nothing wrong.
That<00:36:09.200><c> is</c><00:36:09.359><c> what</c><00:36:09.520><c> my</c><00:36:09.760><c> actual</c><00:36:10.079><c> position</c><00:36:10.480><c> is.</c><00:36:10.880><c> That</c>

00:36:11.109 --> 00:36:11.119 align:start position:0%
That is what my actual position is. That
 

00:36:11.119 --> 00:36:12.710 align:start position:0%
That is what my actual position is. That
couldn't<00:36:11.359><c> all</c><00:36:11.520><c> fit</c><00:36:11.760><c> into</c><00:36:12.000><c> one</c><00:36:12.160><c> tweet.</c><00:36:12.640><c> And</c>

00:36:12.710 --> 00:36:12.720 align:start position:0%
couldn't all fit into one tweet. And
 

00:36:12.720 --> 00:36:14.310 align:start position:0%
couldn't all fit into one tweet. And
this<00:36:12.880><c> is</c><00:36:12.960><c> how</c><00:36:13.119><c> it</c><00:36:13.280><c> differs</c><00:36:13.520><c> from</c><00:36:13.680><c> Zargon's.</c>

00:36:14.310 --> 00:36:14.320 align:start position:0%
this is how it differs from Zargon's.
 

00:36:14.320 --> 00:36:15.349 align:start position:0%
this is how it differs from Zargon's.
We're<00:36:14.480><c> all</c><00:36:14.640><c> just</c><00:36:14.800><c> we're</c><00:36:15.040><c> just</c><00:36:15.200><c> going</c><00:36:15.280><c> to</c>

00:36:15.349 --> 00:36:15.359 align:start position:0%
We're all just we're just going to
 

00:36:15.359 --> 00:36:16.550 align:start position:0%
We're all just we're just going to
pretend<00:36:15.599><c> because</c><00:36:15.760><c> we're</c><00:36:16.000><c> such</c><00:36:16.160><c> polite</c>

00:36:16.550 --> 00:36:16.560 align:start position:0%
pretend because we're such polite
 

00:36:16.560 --> 00:36:18.710 align:start position:0%
pretend because we're such polite
people.<00:36:17.200><c> Well,</c><00:36:17.440><c> that</c><00:36:17.599><c> only</c><00:36:17.839><c> obtains</c><00:36:18.400><c> so</c><00:36:18.640><c> long</c>

00:36:18.710 --> 00:36:18.720 align:start position:0%
people. Well, that only obtains so long
 

00:36:18.720 --> 00:36:21.510 align:start position:0%
people. Well, that only obtains so long
as<00:36:18.880><c> we</c><00:36:19.119><c> feel</c><00:36:19.359><c> the</c><00:36:19.599><c> need</c><00:36:19.760><c> to</c><00:36:19.920><c> be</c><00:36:20.160><c> polite.</c><00:36:21.119><c> If</c><00:36:21.359><c> I</c>

00:36:21.510 --> 00:36:21.520 align:start position:0%
as we feel the need to be polite. If I
 

00:36:21.520 --> 00:36:23.109 align:start position:0%
as we feel the need to be polite. If I
felt<00:36:21.680><c> the</c><00:36:21.920><c> need</c><00:36:22.000><c> to</c><00:36:22.079><c> be</c><00:36:22.160><c> an</c><00:36:22.320><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:36:22.880><c> I</c>

00:36:23.109 --> 00:36:23.119 align:start position:0%
felt the need to be an [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] I
 

00:36:23.119 --> 00:36:25.430 align:start position:0%
felt the need to be an [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] I
reserve<00:36:23.440><c> the</c><00:36:23.680><c> right</c><00:36:23.760><c> to</c><00:36:23.920><c> be</c><00:36:24.079><c> an</c><00:36:24.240><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:36:25.200><c> If</c>

00:36:25.430 --> 00:36:25.440 align:start position:0%
reserve the right to be an [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] If
 

00:36:25.440 --> 00:36:28.950 align:start position:0%
reserve the right to be an [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] If
someone's<00:36:26.800><c> being</c><00:36:27.040><c> an</c><00:36:27.200><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:36:27.599><c> or</c><00:36:28.320><c> deserves</c>

00:36:28.950 --> 00:36:28.960 align:start position:0%
someone's being an [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] or deserves
 

00:36:28.960 --> 00:36:31.030 align:start position:0%
someone's being an [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] or deserves
acting<00:36:29.200><c> in</c><00:36:29.359><c> a</c><00:36:29.440><c> way</c><00:36:29.520><c> that</c><00:36:29.760><c> deserves</c><00:36:30.320><c> an</c><00:36:30.560><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c>

00:36:31.030 --> 00:36:31.040 align:start position:0%
acting in a way that deserves an [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]
 

00:36:31.040 --> 00:36:33.910 align:start position:0%
acting in a way that deserves an [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]
response<00:36:31.359><c> from</c><00:36:31.599><c> me,</c><00:36:32.240><c> I</c><00:36:32.560><c> feel</c><00:36:33.440><c> completely</c>

00:36:33.910 --> 00:36:33.920 align:start position:0%
response from me, I feel completely
 

00:36:33.920 --> 00:36:35.910 align:start position:0%
response from me, I feel completely
entitled<00:36:34.320><c> to</c><00:36:34.560><c> level</c><00:36:34.880><c> one.</c><00:36:35.280><c> This</c><00:36:35.440><c> is</c><00:36:35.599><c> why</c><00:36:35.760><c> I'm</c>

00:36:35.910 --> 00:36:35.920 align:start position:0%
entitled to level one. This is why I'm
 

00:36:35.920 --> 00:36:37.109 align:start position:0%
entitled to level one. This is why I'm
not<00:36:36.000><c> a</c><00:36:36.079><c> libertarian.</c><00:36:36.640><c> This</c><00:36:36.720><c> is</c><00:36:36.800><c> why</c><00:36:36.880><c> I</c><00:36:37.040><c> don't</c>

00:36:37.109 --> 00:36:37.119 align:start position:0%
not a libertarian. This is why I don't
 

00:36:37.119 --> 00:36:38.790 align:start position:0%
not a libertarian. This is why I don't
believe<00:36:37.200><c> in</c><00:36:37.359><c> the</c><00:36:37.440><c> non-aggression</c><00:36:38.000><c> principle.</c>

00:36:38.790 --> 00:36:38.800 align:start position:0%
believe in the non-aggression principle.
 

00:36:38.800 --> 00:36:40.150 align:start position:0%
believe in the non-aggression principle.
No,<00:36:39.119><c> someone's</c><00:36:39.440><c> doing</c><00:36:39.599><c> something</c><00:36:39.839><c> I</c><00:36:40.000><c> think</c>

00:36:40.150 --> 00:36:40.160 align:start position:0%
No, someone's doing something I think
 

00:36:40.160 --> 00:36:41.510 align:start position:0%
No, someone's doing something I think
deserves<00:36:40.560><c> aggression,</c><00:36:40.960><c> then</c><00:36:41.119><c> I'm</c><00:36:41.280><c> going</c><00:36:41.359><c> to</c>

00:36:41.510 --> 00:36:41.520 align:start position:0%
deserves aggression, then I'm going to
 

00:36:41.520 --> 00:36:44.069 align:start position:0%
deserves aggression, then I'm going to
be<00:36:41.680><c> aggressive</c><00:36:42.079><c> towards</c><00:36:42.400><c> them.</c><00:36:43.040><c> Uh,</c><00:36:43.680><c> I</c><00:36:43.920><c> don't</c>

00:36:44.069 --> 00:36:44.079 align:start position:0%
be aggressive towards them. Uh, I don't
 

00:36:44.079 --> 00:36:45.910 align:start position:0%
be aggressive towards them. Uh, I don't
see<00:36:44.240><c> why</c><00:36:44.400><c> I</c><00:36:44.640><c> should</c><00:36:44.800><c> have</c><00:36:44.960><c> to</c><00:36:45.119><c> ideologically</c>

00:36:45.910 --> 00:36:45.920 align:start position:0%
see why I should have to ideologically
 

00:36:45.920 --> 00:36:47.990 align:start position:0%
see why I should have to ideologically
give<00:36:46.160><c> that</c><00:36:46.400><c> up.</c><00:36:46.800><c> If</c><00:36:47.040><c> a</c><00:36:47.200><c> non-passing</c>

00:36:47.990 --> 00:36:48.000 align:start position:0%
give that up. If a non-passing
 

00:36:48.000 --> 00:36:49.670 align:start position:0%
give that up. If a non-passing
transwoman<00:36:48.560><c> was</c><00:36:48.800><c> actually</c><00:36:49.119><c> just</c><00:36:49.359><c> walking</c>

00:36:49.670 --> 00:36:49.680 align:start position:0%
transwoman was actually just walking
 

00:36:49.680 --> 00:36:51.349 align:start position:0%
transwoman was actually just walking
down<00:36:49.839><c> the</c><00:36:50.000><c> sidewalk</c><00:36:50.400><c> or</c><00:36:50.640><c> buying</c><00:36:50.880><c> groceries</c><00:36:51.200><c> at</c>

00:36:51.349 --> 00:36:51.359 align:start position:0%
down the sidewalk or buying groceries at
 

00:36:51.359 --> 00:36:53.109 align:start position:0%
down the sidewalk or buying groceries at
the<00:36:51.440><c> store</c><00:36:51.760><c> and</c><00:36:52.079><c> doing</c><00:36:52.320><c> nothing</c><00:36:52.720><c> actually</c>

00:36:53.109 --> 00:36:53.119 align:start position:0%
the store and doing nothing actually
 

00:36:53.119 --> 00:36:55.109 align:start position:0%
the store and doing nothing actually
wrong,<00:36:53.599><c> just</c><00:36:53.839><c> existing</c><00:36:54.240><c> in</c><00:36:54.480><c> public,</c><00:36:54.880><c> would</c>

00:36:55.109 --> 00:36:55.119 align:start position:0%
wrong, just existing in public, would
 

00:36:55.119 --> 00:36:56.950 align:start position:0%
wrong, just existing in public, would
that<00:36:55.280><c> qualify</c><00:36:55.839><c> as</c><00:36:56.160><c> acting</c><00:36:56.400><c> in</c><00:36:56.560><c> a</c><00:36:56.720><c> way</c><00:36:56.800><c> that</c>

00:36:56.950 --> 00:36:56.960 align:start position:0%
that qualify as acting in a way that
 

00:36:56.960 --> 00:36:58.870 align:start position:0%
that qualify as acting in a way that
deserves<00:36:57.280><c> aggression?</c><00:36:57.680><c> Sargon,</c><00:36:58.240><c> I</c><00:36:58.480><c> hope</c><00:36:58.640><c> not,</c>

00:36:58.870 --> 00:36:58.880 align:start position:0%
deserves aggression? Sargon, I hope not,
 

00:36:58.880 --> 00:37:00.630 align:start position:0%
deserves aggression? Sargon, I hope not,
because<00:36:59.200><c> if</c><00:36:59.440><c> you</c><00:36:59.599><c> answer</c><00:37:00.000><c> yes,</c><00:37:00.240><c> then</c><00:37:00.480><c> you're</c>

00:37:00.630 --> 00:37:00.640 align:start position:0%
because if you answer yes, then you're
 

00:37:00.640 --> 00:37:02.230 align:start position:0%
because if you answer yes, then you're
actually<00:37:00.880><c> the</c><00:37:01.119><c> problem.</c><00:37:01.440><c> The</c><00:37:01.599><c> non-aggression</c>

00:37:02.230 --> 00:37:02.240 align:start position:0%
actually the problem. The non-aggression
 

00:37:02.240 --> 00:37:03.910 align:start position:0%
actually the problem. The non-aggression
principle<00:37:02.560><c> has</c><00:37:02.720><c> its</c><00:37:02.880><c> issues,</c><00:37:03.280><c> sure,</c><00:37:03.440><c> but</c><00:37:03.680><c> it's</c>

00:37:03.910 --> 00:37:03.920 align:start position:0%
principle has its issues, sure, but it's
 

00:37:03.920 --> 00:37:06.150 align:start position:0%
principle has its issues, sure, but it's
honestly<00:37:04.400><c> just</c><00:37:04.640><c> the</c><00:37:04.880><c> gold</c><00:37:05.200><c> standard</c><00:37:05.680><c> for</c><00:37:05.920><c> a</c>

00:37:06.150 --> 00:37:06.160 align:start position:0%
honestly just the gold standard for a
 

00:37:06.160 --> 00:37:08.470 align:start position:0%
honestly just the gold standard for a
lot<00:37:06.240><c> of</c><00:37:06.480><c> everyday</c><00:37:06.960><c> encounters.</c><00:37:07.839><c> Live</c><00:37:08.079><c> and</c><00:37:08.240><c> let</c>

00:37:08.470 --> 00:37:08.480 align:start position:0%
lot of everyday encounters. Live and let
 

00:37:08.480 --> 00:37:10.550 align:start position:0%
lot of everyday encounters. Live and let
live<00:37:08.720><c> liberalism</c><00:37:09.440><c> is</c><00:37:09.760><c> in</c><00:37:09.920><c> fact</c><00:37:10.079><c> a</c><00:37:10.320><c> moral</c>

00:37:10.550 --> 00:37:10.560 align:start position:0%
live liberalism is in fact a moral
 

00:37:10.560 --> 00:37:12.310 align:start position:0%
live liberalism is in fact a moral
position<00:37:10.960><c> that</c><00:37:11.280><c> most</c><00:37:11.520><c> people</c><00:37:11.839><c> believe</c><00:37:12.079><c> is</c>

00:37:12.310 --> 00:37:12.320 align:start position:0%
position that most people believe is
 

00:37:12.320 --> 00:37:13.750 align:start position:0%
position that most people believe is
appropriate<00:37:12.640><c> for</c><00:37:12.880><c> most</c><00:37:13.040><c> of</c><00:37:13.119><c> the</c><00:37:13.280><c> time,</c><00:37:13.520><c> and</c>

00:37:13.750 --> 00:37:13.760 align:start position:0%
appropriate for most of the time, and
 

00:37:13.760 --> 00:37:15.510 align:start position:0%
appropriate for most of the time, and
you<00:37:14.000><c> would</c><00:37:14.160><c> be</c><00:37:14.240><c> the</c><00:37:14.480><c> one</c><00:37:14.640><c> doing</c><00:37:14.880><c> the</c><00:37:15.040><c> wrong</c><00:37:15.280><c> by</c>

00:37:15.510 --> 00:37:15.520 align:start position:0%
you would be the one doing the wrong by
 

00:37:15.520 --> 00:37:17.109 align:start position:0%
you would be the one doing the wrong by
violating<00:37:15.920><c> it.</c><00:37:16.320><c> You</c><00:37:16.560><c> don't</c><00:37:16.640><c> have</c><00:37:16.800><c> to</c><00:37:16.880><c> like</c>

00:37:17.109 --> 00:37:17.119 align:start position:0%
violating it. You don't have to like
 

00:37:17.119 --> 00:37:18.470 align:start position:0%
violating it. You don't have to like
trans<00:37:17.359><c> people.</c><00:37:17.680><c> You</c><00:37:17.839><c> do</c><00:37:17.920><c> have</c><00:37:18.000><c> to</c><00:37:18.160><c> leave</c><00:37:18.320><c> them</c>

00:37:18.470 --> 00:37:18.480 align:start position:0%
trans people. You do have to leave them
 

00:37:18.480 --> 00:37:21.990 align:start position:0%
trans people. You do have to leave them
alone.<00:37:18.960><c> Well,</c><00:37:19.520><c> I</c><00:37:19.760><c> mean,</c><00:37:20.079><c> that's</c><00:37:20.640><c> fair,</c><00:37:21.760><c> but</c>

00:37:21.990 --> 00:37:22.000 align:start position:0%
alone. Well, I mean, that's fair, but
 

00:37:22.000 --> 00:37:24.230 align:start position:0%
alone. Well, I mean, that's fair, but
this<00:37:22.240><c> gap</c><00:37:22.640><c> doesn't</c><00:37:22.960><c> really</c><00:37:23.280><c> exist.</c><00:37:23.839><c> It's</c><00:37:24.079><c> a</c>

00:37:24.230 --> 00:37:24.240 align:start position:0%
this gap doesn't really exist. It's a
 

00:37:24.240 --> 00:37:27.030 align:start position:0%
this gap doesn't really exist. It's a
bunch<00:37:24.400><c> of</c><00:37:24.560><c> It's</c><00:37:24.800><c> very</c><00:37:25.040><c> online,</c><00:37:25.680><c> this</c><00:37:25.920><c> gap.</c><00:37:26.800><c> And</c>

00:37:27.030 --> 00:37:27.040 align:start position:0%
bunch of It's very online, this gap. And
 

00:37:27.040 --> 00:37:30.390 align:start position:0%
bunch of It's very online, this gap. And
it's<00:37:28.160><c> being</c><00:37:28.480><c> rapidly</c><00:37:29.040><c> closed,</c><00:37:29.920><c> but</c><00:37:30.240><c> not</c>

00:37:30.390 --> 00:37:30.400 align:start position:0%
it's being rapidly closed, but not
 

00:37:30.400 --> 00:37:31.990 align:start position:0%
it's being rapidly closed, but not
really<00:37:30.640><c> by</c><00:37:30.800><c> the</c><00:37:31.040><c> right.</c><00:37:31.280><c> The</c><00:37:31.440><c> right</c><00:37:31.680><c> has</c><00:37:31.839><c> just</c>

00:37:31.990 --> 00:37:32.000 align:start position:0%
really by the right. The right has just
 

00:37:32.000 --> 00:37:33.910 align:start position:0%
really by the right. The right has just
been<00:37:32.160><c> like,</c><00:37:32.400><c> well,</c>

00:37:33.910 --> 00:37:33.920 align:start position:0%
been like, well,
 

00:37:33.920 --> 00:37:35.430 align:start position:0%
been like, well,
let's<00:37:34.160><c> just</c><00:37:34.320><c> be</c><00:37:34.480><c> honest</c><00:37:34.720><c> about</c><00:37:34.960><c> this,</c><00:37:35.200><c> shall</c>

00:37:35.430 --> 00:37:35.440 align:start position:0%
let's just be honest about this, shall
 

00:37:35.440 --> 00:37:38.790 align:start position:0%
let's just be honest about this, shall
we?<00:37:36.160><c> And</c><00:37:36.320><c> the</c><00:37:36.480><c> left</c><00:37:36.720><c> has</c><00:37:36.960><c> been</c><00:37:37.119><c> like,</c><00:37:37.440><c> no,</c><00:37:37.760><c> Dev,</c>

00:37:38.790 --> 00:37:38.800 align:start position:0%
we? And the left has been like, no, Dev,
 

00:37:38.800 --> 00:37:41.430 align:start position:0%
we? And the left has been like, no, Dev,
you<00:37:39.040><c> are</c><00:37:39.440><c> basically</c><00:37:40.000><c> a</c><00:37:40.240><c> reactionary</c><00:37:40.960><c> rightist</c>

00:37:41.430 --> 00:37:41.440 align:start position:0%
you are basically a reactionary rightist
 

00:37:41.440 --> 00:37:43.670 align:start position:0%
you are basically a reactionary rightist
who's<00:37:41.680><c> seeking</c><00:37:42.000><c> to</c><00:37:42.240><c> destroy</c><00:37:42.720><c> trans</c><00:37:43.040><c> women.</c>

00:37:43.670 --> 00:37:43.680 align:start position:0%
who's seeking to destroy trans women.
 

00:37:43.680 --> 00:37:45.270 align:start position:0%
who's seeking to destroy trans women.
&gt;&gt; Sargon's<00:37:44.240><c> wrong</c><00:37:44.400><c> about</c><00:37:44.480><c> this,</c><00:37:44.720><c> too.</c><00:37:45.040><c> He's</c><00:37:45.200><c> got</c>

00:37:45.270 --> 00:37:45.280 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; Sargon's wrong about this, too. He's got
 

00:37:45.280 --> 00:37:47.030 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; Sargon's wrong about this, too. He's got
it<00:37:45.440><c> inverted.</c><00:37:45.920><c> Actually,</c><00:37:46.320><c> the</c><00:37:46.560><c> space</c><00:37:46.800><c> that</c>

00:37:47.030 --> 00:37:47.040 align:start position:0%
it inverted. Actually, the space that
 

00:37:47.040 --> 00:37:49.349 align:start position:0%
it inverted. Actually, the space that
I'm<00:37:47.200><c> describing</c><00:37:47.680><c> is</c><00:37:48.000><c> actually</c><00:37:48.400><c> very,</c><00:37:48.960><c> very</c>

00:37:49.349 --> 00:37:49.359 align:start position:0%
I'm describing is actually very, very
 

00:37:49.359 --> 00:37:51.829 align:start position:0%
I'm describing is actually very, very
common<00:37:49.760><c> offline.</c><00:37:50.560><c> Anybody</c><00:37:50.880><c> who's</c><00:37:51.200><c> ever</c><00:37:51.440><c> had</c>

00:37:51.829 --> 00:37:51.839 align:start position:0%
common offline. Anybody who's ever had
 

00:37:51.839 --> 00:37:54.150 align:start position:0%
common offline. Anybody who's ever had
trans<00:37:52.240><c> friends</c><00:37:52.720><c> or</c><00:37:53.040><c> co-workers</c><00:37:53.680><c> or</c><00:37:53.920><c> been</c>

00:37:54.150 --> 00:37:54.160 align:start position:0%
trans friends or co-workers or been
 

00:37:54.160 --> 00:37:55.589 align:start position:0%
trans friends or co-workers or been
involved<00:37:54.480><c> with</c><00:37:54.720><c> trans</c><00:37:55.119><c> people</c><00:37:55.280><c> in</c><00:37:55.440><c> a</c>

00:37:55.589 --> 00:37:55.599 align:start position:0%
involved with trans people in a
 

00:37:55.599 --> 00:37:57.670 align:start position:0%
involved with trans people in a
non-romantic<00:37:56.240><c> capacity</c><00:37:56.880><c> understands</c><00:37:57.440><c> that</c>

00:37:57.670 --> 00:37:57.680 align:start position:0%
non-romantic capacity understands that
 

00:37:57.680 --> 00:37:59.670 align:start position:0%
non-romantic capacity understands that
my<00:37:58.000><c> position</c><00:37:58.400><c> is</c><00:37:58.720><c> actually</c><00:37:58.960><c> the</c><00:37:59.200><c> dominant</c>

00:37:59.670 --> 00:37:59.680 align:start position:0%
my position is actually the dominant
 

00:37:59.680 --> 00:38:02.069 align:start position:0%
my position is actually the dominant
normal<00:38:00.000><c> one.</c><00:38:00.400><c> I</c><00:38:00.640><c> am</c><00:38:00.880><c> how</c><00:38:01.040><c> your</c><00:38:01.359><c> average</c><00:38:01.680><c> person</c>

00:38:02.069 --> 00:38:02.079 align:start position:0%
normal one. I am how your average person
 

00:38:02.079 --> 00:38:04.630 align:start position:0%
normal one. I am how your average person
behaves<00:38:02.560><c> on</c><00:38:02.880><c> this</c><00:38:03.040><c> topic.</c><00:38:03.680><c> This</c><00:38:04.079><c> rapidly</c>

00:38:04.630 --> 00:38:04.640 align:start position:0%
behaves on this topic. This rapidly
 

00:38:04.640 --> 00:38:06.550 align:start position:0%
behaves on this topic. This rapidly
closing<00:38:05.119><c> gap</c><00:38:05.440><c> as</c><00:38:05.680><c> the</c><00:38:05.760><c> dialectic</c><00:38:06.320><c> comes</c><00:38:06.480><c> to</c>

00:38:06.550 --> 00:38:06.560 align:start position:0%
closing gap as the dialectic comes to
 

00:38:06.560 --> 00:38:08.630 align:start position:0%
closing gap as the dialectic comes to
its<00:38:06.800><c> conclusion.</c><00:38:07.520><c> That</c><00:38:07.760><c> is</c><00:38:07.920><c> the</c><00:38:08.079><c> terminally</c>

00:38:08.630 --> 00:38:08.640 align:start position:0%
its conclusion. That is the terminally
 

00:38:08.640 --> 00:38:10.710 align:start position:0%
its conclusion. That is the terminally
online<00:38:09.040><c> brain</c><00:38:09.280><c> rot.</c><00:38:09.760><c> In</c><00:38:10.000><c> real</c><00:38:10.160><c> life,</c><00:38:10.560><c> there</c>

00:38:10.710 --> 00:38:10.720 align:start position:0%
online brain rot. In real life, there
 

00:38:10.720 --> 00:38:12.390 align:start position:0%
online brain rot. In real life, there
are<00:38:10.880><c> a</c><00:38:11.119><c> lot</c><00:38:11.200><c> more</c><00:38:11.440><c> Lilith</c><00:38:11.839><c> love</c><00:38:12.160><c> than</c><00:38:12.240><c> there</c>

00:38:12.390 --> 00:38:12.400 align:start position:0%
are a lot more Lilith love than there
 

00:38:12.400 --> 00:38:14.150 align:start position:0%
are a lot more Lilith love than there
are<00:38:12.560><c> naras.</c><00:38:13.200><c> That's</c><00:38:13.359><c> for</c><00:38:13.520><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:38:13.760><c> sure.</c><00:38:14.000><c> And</c>

00:38:14.150 --> 00:38:14.160 align:start position:0%
are naras. That's for [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] sure. And
 

00:38:14.160 --> 00:38:15.750 align:start position:0%
are naras. That's for [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] sure. And
to<00:38:14.320><c> be</c><00:38:14.400><c> honest,</c><00:38:14.720><c> this</c><00:38:14.880><c> is</c><00:38:14.960><c> a</c><00:38:15.119><c> huge</c><00:38:15.440><c> problem</c><00:38:15.599><c> for</c>

00:38:15.750 --> 00:38:15.760 align:start position:0%
to be honest, this is a huge problem for
 

00:38:15.760 --> 00:38:17.910 align:start position:0%
to be honest, this is a huge problem for
the<00:38:16.000><c> online</c><00:38:16.320><c> right,</c><00:38:16.640><c> including</c><00:38:16.960><c> Sargon,</c><00:38:17.520><c> in</c><00:38:17.760><c> a</c>

00:38:17.910 --> 00:38:17.920 align:start position:0%
the online right, including Sargon, in a
 

00:38:17.920 --> 00:38:19.910 align:start position:0%
the online right, including Sargon, in a
lot<00:38:18.000><c> of</c><00:38:18.079><c> topics</c><00:38:18.400><c> far</c><00:38:18.640><c> beyond</c><00:38:18.960><c> today's.</c><00:38:19.680><c> They</c>

00:38:19.910 --> 00:38:19.920 align:start position:0%
lot of topics far beyond today's. They
 

00:38:19.920 --> 00:38:21.829 align:start position:0%
lot of topics far beyond today's. They
believe<00:38:20.160><c> the</c><00:38:20.400><c> loudest,</c><00:38:21.040><c> most</c><00:38:21.280><c> terminally</c>

00:38:21.829 --> 00:38:21.839 align:start position:0%
believe the loudest, most terminally
 

00:38:21.839 --> 00:38:24.630 align:start position:0%
believe the loudest, most terminally
online,<00:38:22.480><c> most</c><00:38:22.800><c> far-left</c><00:38:23.440><c> voice</c><00:38:24.000><c> represents</c>

00:38:24.630 --> 00:38:24.640 align:start position:0%
online, most far-left voice represents
 

00:38:24.640 --> 00:38:26.790 align:start position:0%
online, most far-left voice represents
every<00:38:24.960><c> single</c><00:38:25.280><c> person</c><00:38:25.520><c> they</c><00:38:25.760><c> oppose,</c><00:38:26.320><c> when</c><00:38:26.560><c> it</c>

00:38:26.790 --> 00:38:26.800 align:start position:0%
every single person they oppose, when it
 

00:38:26.800 --> 00:38:28.710 align:start position:0%
every single person they oppose, when it
just<00:38:27.119><c> doesn't.</c><00:38:27.680><c> Uh,</c><00:38:27.920><c> but</c><00:38:28.079><c> you</c><00:38:28.240><c> can</c><00:38:28.320><c> see</c><00:38:28.480><c> they</c>

00:38:28.710 --> 00:38:28.720 align:start position:0%
just doesn't. Uh, but you can see they
 

00:38:28.720 --> 00:38:32.230 align:start position:0%
just doesn't. Uh, but you can see they
just<00:38:28.880><c> do</c><00:38:29.040><c> not</c><00:38:29.200><c> accept</c><00:38:29.839><c> Dev's</c><00:38:30.320><c> premise.</c><00:38:31.680><c> So,</c>

00:38:32.230 --> 00:38:32.240 align:start position:0%
just do not accept Dev's premise. So,
 

00:38:32.240 --> 00:38:34.310 align:start position:0%
just do not accept Dev's premise. So,
they<00:38:32.480><c> actually</c><00:38:32.800><c> do</c><00:38:33.040><c> think</c><00:38:33.599><c> trans</c><00:38:34.000><c> women</c>

00:38:34.310 --> 00:38:34.320 align:start position:0%
they actually do think trans women
 

00:38:34.320 --> 00:38:36.870 align:start position:0%
they actually do think trans women
metamorphoses<00:38:35.119><c> into</c><00:38:35.359><c> biological</c><00:38:35.920><c> females.</c>

00:38:36.870 --> 00:38:36.880 align:start position:0%
metamorphoses into biological females.
 

00:38:36.880 --> 00:38:39.510 align:start position:0%
metamorphoses into biological females.
HRT<00:38:37.680><c> literally</c><00:38:38.160><c> makes</c><00:38:38.400><c> us</c><00:38:38.800><c> biologically</c>

00:38:39.510 --> 00:38:39.520 align:start position:0%
HRT literally makes us biologically
 

00:38:39.520 --> 00:38:42.550 align:start position:0%
HRT literally makes us biologically
female.<00:38:40.320><c> I</c><00:38:40.560><c> mean,</c><00:38:41.040><c> 5,700</c>

00:38:42.550 --> 00:38:42.560 align:start position:0%
female. I mean, 5,700
 

00:38:42.560 --> 00:38:45.589 align:start position:0%
female. I mean, 5,700
likes<00:38:42.960><c> on</c><00:38:43.119><c> that</c><00:38:43.359><c> one.</c><00:38:43.920><c> Like</c><00:38:44.079><c> these</c><00:38:44.720><c> 7,500</c>

00:38:45.589 --> 00:38:45.599 align:start position:0%
likes on that one. Like these 7,500
 

00:38:45.599 --> 00:38:48.950 align:start position:0%
likes on that one. Like these 7,500
likes<00:38:45.839><c> on</c><00:38:46.000><c> that</c><00:38:46.160><c> one.</c><00:38:47.440><c> Dev</c><00:38:47.839><c> only</c><00:38:48.079><c> had</c><00:38:48.480><c> what?</c>

00:38:48.950 --> 00:38:48.960 align:start position:0%
likes on that one. Dev only had what?
 

00:38:48.960 --> 00:38:52.069 align:start position:0%
likes on that one. Dev only had what?
700<00:38:49.520><c> likes</c><00:38:49.839><c> on</c><00:38:50.000><c> his.</c><00:38:50.800><c> Sorry,</c><00:38:51.119><c> Dev.</c><00:38:51.599><c> I</c><00:38:51.839><c> don't</c>

00:38:52.069 --> 00:38:52.079 align:start position:0%
700 likes on his. Sorry, Dev. I don't
 

00:38:52.079 --> 00:38:53.510 align:start position:0%
700 likes on his. Sorry, Dev. I don't
think<00:38:52.240><c> the</c><00:38:52.480><c> gap</c><00:38:52.720><c> that</c><00:38:52.960><c> you're</c><00:38:53.119><c> trying</c><00:38:53.359><c> to</c>

00:38:53.510 --> 00:38:53.520 align:start position:0%
think the gap that you're trying to
 

00:38:53.520 --> 00:38:55.829 align:start position:0%
think the gap that you're trying to
carve<00:38:53.760><c> out</c><00:38:54.079><c> actually</c><00:38:54.400><c> exists</c><00:38:54.880><c> here.</c><00:38:55.680><c> You</c>

00:38:55.829 --> 00:38:55.839 align:start position:0%
carve out actually exists here. You
 

00:38:55.839 --> 00:38:57.030 align:start position:0%
carve out actually exists here. You
either<00:38:56.160><c> believe</c><00:38:56.480><c> it</c><00:38:56.720><c> makes</c><00:38:56.880><c> them</c>

00:38:57.030 --> 00:38:57.040 align:start position:0%
either believe it makes them
 

00:38:57.040 --> 00:38:58.870 align:start position:0%
either believe it makes them
biologically<00:38:57.680><c> female</c><00:38:58.160><c> or</c><00:38:58.480><c> you're</c><00:38:58.720><c> a</c>

00:38:58.870 --> 00:38:58.880 align:start position:0%
biologically female or you're a
 

00:38:58.880 --> 00:39:01.510 align:start position:0%
biologically female or you're a
reactionary<00:38:59.599><c> writist.</c><00:39:00.800><c> You've</c><00:39:01.119><c> got</c><00:39:01.280><c> to</c><00:39:01.440><c> make</c>

00:39:01.510 --> 00:39:01.520 align:start position:0%
reactionary writist. You've got to make
 

00:39:01.520 --> 00:39:03.670 align:start position:0%
reactionary writist. You've got to make
the<00:39:01.839><c> decision</c><00:39:02.079><c> on</c><00:39:02.320><c> that.</c><00:39:02.960><c> This</c><00:39:03.119><c> is</c><00:39:03.280><c> the</c><00:39:03.520><c> part</c>

00:39:03.670 --> 00:39:03.680 align:start position:0%
the decision on that. This is the part
 

00:39:03.680 --> 00:39:05.030 align:start position:0%
the decision on that. This is the part
where<00:39:03.839><c> I</c><00:39:04.000><c> fundamentally</c><00:39:04.560><c> disagree</c><00:39:04.880><c> with</c>

00:39:05.030 --> 00:39:05.040 align:start position:0%
where I fundamentally disagree with
 

00:39:05.040 --> 00:39:07.270 align:start position:0%
where I fundamentally disagree with
Sargon.<00:39:05.760><c> Not</c><00:39:06.000><c> only</c><00:39:06.160><c> has</c><00:39:06.320><c> he</c><00:39:06.480><c> accepted</c><00:39:06.800><c> Marxist</c>

00:39:07.270 --> 00:39:07.280 align:start position:0%
Sargon. Not only has he accepted Marxist
 

00:39:07.280 --> 00:39:08.950 align:start position:0%
Sargon. Not only has he accepted Marxist
premises,<00:39:07.760><c> but</c><00:39:07.920><c> he's</c><00:39:08.160><c> also</c><00:39:08.320><c> accepted</c><00:39:08.720><c> the</c>

00:39:08.950 --> 00:39:08.960 align:start position:0%
premises, but he's also accepted the
 

00:39:08.960 --> 00:39:10.790 align:start position:0%
premises, but he's also accepted the
same<00:39:09.040><c> conclusion.</c><00:39:09.680><c> He's</c><00:39:10.000><c> reduced</c><00:39:10.480><c> everything</c>

00:39:10.790 --> 00:39:10.800 align:start position:0%
same conclusion. He's reduced everything
 

00:39:10.800 --> 00:39:13.030 align:start position:0%
same conclusion. He's reduced everything
to<00:39:11.200><c> either</c><00:39:11.520><c> you</c><00:39:11.760><c> accept</c><00:39:12.160><c> all</c><00:39:12.480><c> of</c><00:39:12.560><c> the</c><00:39:12.800><c> trans</c>

00:39:13.030 --> 00:39:13.040 align:start position:0%
to either you accept all of the trans
 

00:39:13.040 --> 00:39:14.550 align:start position:0%
to either you accept all of the trans
activist<00:39:13.520><c> positions</c><00:39:14.000><c> or</c><00:39:14.320><c> you're</c><00:39:14.480><c> a</c>

00:39:14.550 --> 00:39:14.560 align:start position:0%
activist positions or you're a
 

00:39:14.560 --> 00:39:16.150 align:start position:0%
activist positions or you're a
reactionary<00:39:15.040><c> right-winger</c><00:39:15.440><c> like</c><00:39:15.599><c> me.</c><00:39:15.839><c> And</c><00:39:16.000><c> to</c>

00:39:16.150 --> 00:39:16.160 align:start position:0%
reactionary right-winger like me. And to
 

00:39:16.160 --> 00:39:18.550 align:start position:0%
reactionary right-winger like me. And to
that<00:39:16.320><c> I</c><00:39:16.560><c> simply</c><00:39:16.880><c> say</c><00:39:17.359><c> no.</c><00:39:17.920><c> Why</c><00:39:18.079><c> would</c><00:39:18.240><c> I</c><00:39:18.400><c> let</c>

00:39:18.550 --> 00:39:18.560 align:start position:0%
that I simply say no. Why would I let
 

00:39:18.560 --> 00:39:19.670 align:start position:0%
that I simply say no. Why would I let
the<00:39:18.720><c> people</c><00:39:18.800><c> who</c><00:39:18.960><c> are</c><00:39:19.119><c> wrong</c><00:39:19.280><c> about</c><00:39:19.520><c> this</c>

00:39:19.670 --> 00:39:19.680 align:start position:0%
the people who are wrong about this
 

00:39:19.680 --> 00:39:21.990 align:start position:0%
the people who are wrong about this
conversation<00:39:20.320><c> dictate</c><00:39:20.720><c> its</c><00:39:21.040><c> terms?</c><00:39:21.680><c> I</c><00:39:21.839><c> don't</c>

00:39:21.990 --> 00:39:22.000 align:start position:0%
conversation dictate its terms? I don't
 

00:39:22.000 --> 00:39:23.750 align:start position:0%
conversation dictate its terms? I don't
actually<00:39:22.320><c> care</c><00:39:22.640><c> if</c><00:39:22.960><c> they</c><00:39:23.200><c> view</c><00:39:23.440><c> me</c><00:39:23.520><c> as</c><00:39:23.680><c> a</c>

00:39:23.750 --> 00:39:23.760 align:start position:0%
actually care if they view me as a
 

00:39:23.760 --> 00:39:25.109 align:start position:0%
actually care if they view me as a
reactionary<00:39:24.240><c> right-winger.</c><00:39:24.800><c> That</c><00:39:25.040><c> just</c>

00:39:25.109 --> 00:39:25.119 align:start position:0%
reactionary right-winger. That just
 

00:39:25.119 --> 00:39:26.630 align:start position:0%
reactionary right-winger. That just
means<00:39:25.359><c> they're</c><00:39:25.599><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:39:25.839><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:39:26.320><c> And</c><00:39:26.480><c> in</c>

00:39:26.630 --> 00:39:26.640 align:start position:0%
means they're [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] And in
 

00:39:26.640 --> 00:39:28.069 align:start position:0%
means they're [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] And in
the<00:39:26.720><c> same</c><00:39:26.880><c> vein,</c><00:39:27.200><c> I</c><00:39:27.359><c> don't</c><00:39:27.520><c> care</c><00:39:27.599><c> if</c><00:39:27.839><c> people</c><00:39:27.920><c> on</c>

00:39:28.069 --> 00:39:28.079 align:start position:0%
the same vein, I don't care if people on
 

00:39:28.079 --> 00:39:29.430 align:start position:0%
the same vein, I don't care if people on
the<00:39:28.160><c> right</c><00:39:28.400><c> view</c><00:39:28.560><c> me</c><00:39:28.640><c> as</c><00:39:28.720><c> a</c><00:39:28.880><c> revolutionary</c>

00:39:29.430 --> 00:39:29.440 align:start position:0%
the right view me as a revolutionary
 

00:39:29.440 --> 00:39:30.950 align:start position:0%
the right view me as a revolutionary
communist<00:39:29.920><c> either.</c><00:39:30.320><c> That</c><00:39:30.560><c> just</c><00:39:30.720><c> means</c>

00:39:30.950 --> 00:39:30.960 align:start position:0%
communist either. That just means
 

00:39:30.960 --> 00:39:32.790 align:start position:0%
communist either. That just means
they're<00:39:31.119><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:39:31.440><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:39:31.839><c> too.</c><00:39:32.240><c> Sargon's</c>

00:39:32.790 --> 00:39:32.800 align:start position:0%
they're [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] too. Sargon's
 

00:39:32.800 --> 00:39:34.550 align:start position:0%
they're [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] too. Sargon's
argument<00:39:33.119><c> here</c><00:39:33.440><c> basically</c><00:39:33.920><c> boils</c><00:39:34.320><c> down</c><00:39:34.480><c> to</c>

00:39:34.550 --> 00:39:34.560 align:start position:0%
argument here basically boils down to
 

00:39:34.560 --> 00:39:36.470 align:start position:0%
argument here basically boils down to
one<00:39:34.800><c> of</c><00:39:34.960><c> popularity.</c><00:39:35.680><c> A</c><00:39:35.839><c> lot</c><00:39:35.920><c> of</c><00:39:36.079><c> online</c>

00:39:36.470 --> 00:39:36.480 align:start position:0%
one of popularity. A lot of online
 

00:39:36.480 --> 00:39:38.069 align:start position:0%
one of popularity. A lot of online
radicals<00:39:36.880><c> said</c><00:39:37.040><c> you</c><00:39:37.200><c> were</c><00:39:37.280><c> wrong,</c><00:39:37.520><c> Dev.</c><00:39:37.839><c> The</c>

00:39:38.069 --> 00:39:38.079 align:start position:0%
radicals said you were wrong, Dev. The
 

00:39:38.079 --> 00:39:39.109 align:start position:0%
radicals said you were wrong, Dev. The
people<00:39:38.160><c> who</c><00:39:38.320><c> you</c><00:39:38.480><c> were</c><00:39:38.640><c> defending</c><00:39:38.880><c> have</c>

00:39:39.109 --> 00:39:39.119 align:start position:0%
people who you were defending have
 

00:39:39.119 --> 00:39:40.630 align:start position:0%
people who you were defending have
stabbed<00:39:39.280><c> you</c><00:39:39.440><c> in</c><00:39:39.520><c> the</c><00:39:39.599><c> back,</c><00:39:39.839><c> Dev.</c><00:39:40.320><c> You</c><00:39:40.480><c> should</c>

00:39:40.630 --> 00:39:40.640 align:start position:0%
stabbed you in the back, Dev. You should
 

00:39:40.640 --> 00:39:42.630 align:start position:0%
stabbed you in the back, Dev. You should
just<00:39:40.800><c> join</c><00:39:41.040><c> us</c><00:39:41.119><c> on</c><00:39:41.280><c> the</c><00:39:41.440><c> right,</c><00:39:41.680><c> Dev.</c><00:39:42.320><c> Well,</c>

00:39:42.630 --> 00:39:42.640 align:start position:0%
just join us on the right, Dev. Well,
 

00:39:42.640 --> 00:39:44.710 align:start position:0%
just join us on the right, Dev. Well,
one,<00:39:43.119><c> I</c><00:39:43.359><c> actually</c><00:39:43.599><c> have</c><00:39:43.760><c> more</c><00:39:44.000><c> daggers</c><00:39:44.400><c> on</c><00:39:44.640><c> my</c>

00:39:44.710 --> 00:39:44.720 align:start position:0%
one, I actually have more daggers on my
 

00:39:44.720 --> 00:39:46.390 align:start position:0%
one, I actually have more daggers on my
back<00:39:44.960><c> from</c><00:39:45.119><c> your</c><00:39:45.359><c> camp</c><00:39:45.599><c> than</c><00:39:45.839><c> theirs</c><00:39:46.160><c> even</c>

00:39:46.390 --> 00:39:46.400 align:start position:0%
back from your camp than theirs even
 

00:39:46.400 --> 00:39:48.069 align:start position:0%
back from your camp than theirs even
now.<00:39:46.800><c> Thank</c><00:39:46.880><c> you</c><00:39:47.040><c> very</c><00:39:47.200><c> much.</c><00:39:47.599><c> But</c><00:39:47.839><c> more</c>

00:39:48.069 --> 00:39:48.079 align:start position:0%
now. Thank you very much. But more
 

00:39:48.079 --> 00:39:50.230 align:start position:0%
now. Thank you very much. But more
importantly,<00:39:48.640><c> what</c><00:39:48.960><c> is</c><00:39:49.200><c> true</c><00:39:49.520><c> and</c><00:39:49.839><c> correct</c>

00:39:50.230 --> 00:39:50.240 align:start position:0%
importantly, what is true and correct
 

00:39:50.240 --> 00:39:53.030 align:start position:0%
importantly, what is true and correct
and<00:39:50.560><c> good</c><00:39:51.040><c> matters</c><00:39:51.520><c> more</c><00:39:51.920><c> than</c><00:39:52.240><c> whose</c><00:39:52.560><c> side</c>

00:39:53.030 --> 00:39:53.040 align:start position:0%
and good matters more than whose side
 

00:39:53.040 --> 00:39:54.870 align:start position:0%
and good matters more than whose side
something<00:39:53.359><c> helps.</c><00:39:54.000><c> This</c><00:39:54.160><c> was</c><00:39:54.320><c> also</c><00:39:54.560><c> another</c>

00:39:54.870 --> 00:39:54.880 align:start position:0%
something helps. This was also another
 

00:39:54.880 --> 00:39:56.710 align:start position:0%
something helps. This was also another
branch<00:39:55.040><c> of</c><00:39:55.200><c> the</c><00:39:55.280><c> Niara</c><00:39:55.760><c> drama</c><00:39:56.079><c> where</c><00:39:56.240><c> Niara</c>

00:39:56.710 --> 00:39:56.720 align:start position:0%
branch of the Niara drama where Niara
 

00:39:56.720 --> 00:39:58.069 align:start position:0%
branch of the Niara drama where Niara
and<00:39:56.880><c> others</c><00:39:57.040><c> like</c><00:39:57.200><c> her</c><00:39:57.440><c> would</c><00:39:57.599><c> shriek</c><00:39:57.839><c> at</c><00:39:58.000><c> me</c>

00:39:58.069 --> 00:39:58.079 align:start position:0%
and others like her would shriek at me
 

00:39:58.079 --> 00:40:00.150 align:start position:0%
and others like her would shriek at me
that<00:39:58.320><c> I'm</c><00:39:58.480><c> not</c><00:39:58.640><c> a</c><00:39:58.880><c> real</c><00:39:59.119><c> ally</c><00:39:59.520><c> because</c><00:39:59.760><c> I'm</c><00:40:00.000><c> not</c>

00:40:00.150 --> 00:40:00.160 align:start position:0%
that I'm not a real ally because I'm not
 

00:40:00.160 --> 00:40:01.990 align:start position:0%
that I'm not a real ally because I'm not
saying<00:40:00.320><c> or</c><00:40:00.640><c> thinking</c><00:40:00.880><c> the</c><00:40:01.040><c> right</c><00:40:01.200><c> things.</c><00:40:01.760><c> And</c>

00:40:01.990 --> 00:40:02.000 align:start position:0%
saying or thinking the right things. And
 

00:40:02.000 --> 00:40:03.750 align:start position:0%
saying or thinking the right things. And
okay,<00:40:02.480><c> I</c><00:40:02.720><c> actually</c><00:40:02.880><c> don't</c><00:40:03.119><c> give</c><00:40:03.280><c> a</c><00:40:03.440><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:40:03.599><c> if</c>

00:40:03.750 --> 00:40:03.760 align:start position:0%
okay, I actually don't give a [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] if
 

00:40:03.760 --> 00:40:05.190 align:start position:0%
okay, I actually don't give a [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] if
you<00:40:03.839><c> think</c><00:40:03.920><c> I'm</c><00:40:04.079><c> an</c><00:40:04.240><c> ally</c><00:40:04.480><c> or</c><00:40:04.640><c> not.</c><00:40:04.880><c> What</c>

00:40:05.190 --> 00:40:05.200 align:start position:0%
you think I'm an ally or not. What
 

00:40:05.200 --> 00:40:07.270 align:start position:0%
you think I'm an ally or not. What
matters<00:40:05.520><c> is,</c><00:40:05.839><c> is</c><00:40:06.079><c> what</c><00:40:06.240><c> I'm</c><00:40:06.480><c> saying</c><00:40:06.800><c> actually</c>

00:40:07.270 --> 00:40:07.280 align:start position:0%
matters is, is what I'm saying actually
 

00:40:07.280 --> 00:40:09.750 align:start position:0%
matters is, is what I'm saying actually
true?<00:40:07.920><c> For</c><00:40:08.079><c> example,</c><00:40:08.560><c> it</c><00:40:08.800><c> is</c><00:40:08.960><c> just</c><00:40:09.200><c> true</c><00:40:09.440><c> that</c>

00:40:09.750 --> 00:40:09.760 align:start position:0%
true? For example, it is just true that
 

00:40:09.760 --> 00:40:12.150 align:start position:0%
true? For example, it is just true that
Taftage<00:40:10.480><c> looks</c><00:40:10.640><c> like</c><00:40:10.800><c> a</c><00:40:10.960><c> woman.</c><00:40:11.359><c> It</c><00:40:11.520><c> is</c><00:40:11.760><c> also</c>

00:40:12.150 --> 00:40:12.160 align:start position:0%
Taftage looks like a woman. It is also
 

00:40:12.160 --> 00:40:14.150 align:start position:0%
Taftage looks like a woman. It is also
just<00:40:12.480><c> true</c><00:40:12.800><c> that</c><00:40:13.040><c> the</c><00:40:13.280><c> experience</c><00:40:13.680><c> of</c><00:40:13.839><c> gender</c>

00:40:14.150 --> 00:40:14.160 align:start position:0%
just true that the experience of gender
 

00:40:14.160 --> 00:40:15.510 align:start position:0%
just true that the experience of gender
dysphoria<00:40:14.640><c> causes</c><00:40:14.880><c> a</c><00:40:15.040><c> lot</c><00:40:15.200><c> of</c><00:40:15.280><c> mental</c>

00:40:15.510 --> 00:40:15.520 align:start position:0%
dysphoria causes a lot of mental
 

00:40:15.520 --> 00:40:17.109 align:start position:0%
dysphoria causes a lot of mental
distress<00:40:15.920><c> and</c><00:40:16.160><c> that</c><00:40:16.320><c> transitioning</c><00:40:16.880><c> your</c>

00:40:17.109 --> 00:40:17.119 align:start position:0%
distress and that transitioning your
 

00:40:17.119 --> 00:40:18.470 align:start position:0%
distress and that transitioning your
body<00:40:17.280><c> to</c><00:40:17.520><c> be</c><00:40:17.599><c> more</c><00:40:17.839><c> in</c><00:40:18.000><c> line</c><00:40:18.160><c> with</c><00:40:18.240><c> the</c>

00:40:18.470 --> 00:40:18.480 align:start position:0%
body to be more in line with the
 

00:40:18.480 --> 00:40:19.990 align:start position:0%
body to be more in line with the
opposite<00:40:18.720><c> sex,</c><00:40:19.200><c> even</c><00:40:19.359><c> if</c><00:40:19.520><c> you</c><00:40:19.599><c> can't</c><00:40:19.760><c> get</c><00:40:19.920><c> all</c>

00:40:19.990 --> 00:40:20.000 align:start position:0%
opposite sex, even if you can't get all
 

00:40:20.000 --> 00:40:21.990 align:start position:0%
opposite sex, even if you can't get all
the<00:40:20.160><c> way</c><00:40:20.240><c> there,</c><00:40:20.640><c> does</c><00:40:20.960><c> in</c><00:40:21.200><c> fact</c><00:40:21.440><c> alleviate</c>

00:40:21.990 --> 00:40:22.000 align:start position:0%
the way there, does in fact alleviate
 

00:40:22.000 --> 00:40:24.630 align:start position:0%
the way there, does in fact alleviate
that<00:40:22.320><c> distress.</c><00:40:23.040><c> The</c><00:40:23.280><c> data</c><00:40:23.520><c> is</c><00:40:23.760><c> in</c><00:40:24.000><c> on</c><00:40:24.160><c> this.</c>

00:40:24.630 --> 00:40:24.640 align:start position:0%
that distress. The data is in on this.
 

00:40:24.640 --> 00:40:25.750 align:start position:0%
that distress. The data is in on this.
People<00:40:24.800><c> with</c><00:40:24.960><c> gender</c><00:40:25.280><c> dysphoria</c>

00:40:25.750 --> 00:40:25.760 align:start position:0%
People with gender dysphoria
 

00:40:25.760 --> 00:40:27.190 align:start position:0%
People with gender dysphoria
pre-transition<00:40:26.400><c> versus</c><00:40:26.720><c> people</c><00:40:26.880><c> with</c><00:40:26.960><c> gender</c>

00:40:27.190 --> 00:40:27.200 align:start position:0%
pre-transition versus people with gender
 

00:40:27.200 --> 00:40:28.630 align:start position:0%
pre-transition versus people with gender
dysphoria<00:40:27.680><c> post-transition.</c><00:40:28.480><c> The</c>

00:40:28.630 --> 00:40:28.640 align:start position:0%
dysphoria post-transition. The
 

00:40:28.640 --> 00:40:30.230 align:start position:0%
dysphoria post-transition. The
post-transition<00:40:29.359><c> people</c><00:40:29.680><c> consistently</c>

00:40:30.230 --> 00:40:30.240 align:start position:0%
post-transition people consistently
 

00:40:30.240 --> 00:40:31.829 align:start position:0%
post-transition people consistently
report<00:40:30.560><c> higher</c><00:40:30.880><c> quality</c><00:40:31.119><c> of</c><00:40:31.359><c> life.</c>

00:40:31.829 --> 00:40:31.839 align:start position:0%
report higher quality of life.
 

00:40:31.839 --> 00:40:33.910 align:start position:0%
report higher quality of life.
Legitimate<00:40:32.400><c> transphobes</c><00:40:33.119><c> do</c><00:40:33.359><c> occasionally</c>

00:40:33.910 --> 00:40:33.920 align:start position:0%
Legitimate transphobes do occasionally
 

00:40:33.920 --> 00:40:35.990 align:start position:0%
Legitimate transphobes do occasionally
post<00:40:34.400><c> this</c><00:40:34.640><c> study,</c><00:40:34.960><c> which</c><00:40:35.200><c> they</c><00:40:35.440><c> claim</c><00:40:35.760><c> says</c>

00:40:35.990 --> 00:40:36.000 align:start position:0%
post this study, which they claim says
 

00:40:36.000 --> 00:40:38.150 align:start position:0%
post this study, which they claim says
the<00:40:36.160><c> opposite,</c><00:40:36.560><c> but</c><00:40:36.800><c> it</c><00:40:37.040><c> doesn't.</c><00:40:37.599><c> This</c><00:40:37.839><c> study</c>

00:40:38.150 --> 00:40:38.160 align:start position:0%
the opposite, but it doesn't. This study
 

00:40:38.160 --> 00:40:39.670 align:start position:0%
the opposite, but it doesn't. This study
says<00:40:38.480><c> that</c><00:40:38.800><c> people</c><00:40:39.040><c> without</c><00:40:39.359><c> gender</c>

00:40:39.670 --> 00:40:39.680 align:start position:0%
says that people without gender
 

00:40:39.680 --> 00:40:41.430 align:start position:0%
says that people without gender
dysphoria<00:40:40.160><c> have</c><00:40:40.320><c> a</c><00:40:40.560><c> higher</c><00:40:40.800><c> quality</c><00:40:41.040><c> of</c><00:40:41.200><c> life</c>

00:40:41.430 --> 00:40:41.440 align:start position:0%
dysphoria have a higher quality of life
 

00:40:41.440 --> 00:40:42.950 align:start position:0%
dysphoria have a higher quality of life
than<00:40:41.680><c> people</c><00:40:41.920><c> with</c><00:40:42.079><c> gender</c><00:40:42.320><c> dysphoria</c><00:40:42.800><c> who</c>

00:40:42.950 --> 00:40:42.960 align:start position:0%
than people with gender dysphoria who
 

00:40:42.960 --> 00:40:44.470 align:start position:0%
than people with gender dysphoria who
transition,<00:40:43.440><c> which</c><00:40:43.680><c> is</c><00:40:43.839><c> just</c><00:40:44.000><c> obviously</c>

00:40:44.470 --> 00:40:44.480 align:start position:0%
transition, which is just obviously
 

00:40:44.480 --> 00:40:46.790 align:start position:0%
transition, which is just obviously
true.<00:40:44.880><c> But</c><00:40:45.040><c> they're</c><00:40:45.200><c> not</c><00:40:45.440><c> comparing</c><00:40:46.079><c> pre</c><00:40:46.480><c> and</c>

00:40:46.790 --> 00:40:46.800 align:start position:0%
true. But they're not comparing pre and
 

00:40:46.800 --> 00:40:48.710 align:start position:0%
true. But they're not comparing pre and
posttransition<00:40:47.920><c> gender</c><00:40:48.240><c> dysphoria</c>

00:40:48.710 --> 00:40:48.720 align:start position:0%
posttransition gender dysphoria
 

00:40:48.720 --> 00:40:50.470 align:start position:0%
posttransition gender dysphoria
sufferers.<00:40:49.359><c> And</c><00:40:49.520><c> when</c><00:40:49.680><c> you</c><00:40:49.839><c> do</c><00:40:50.000><c> that,</c><00:40:50.240><c> you</c>

00:40:50.470 --> 00:40:50.480 align:start position:0%
sufferers. And when you do that, you
 

00:40:50.480 --> 00:40:52.630 align:start position:0%
sufferers. And when you do that, you
just<00:40:50.640><c> plainly</c><00:40:51.119><c> see</c><00:40:51.520><c> transitioning</c><00:40:52.240><c> helps</c>

00:40:52.630 --> 00:40:52.640 align:start position:0%
just plainly see transitioning helps
 

00:40:52.640 --> 00:40:54.390 align:start position:0%
just plainly see transitioning helps
treat<00:40:52.880><c> the</c><00:40:53.119><c> symptoms</c><00:40:53.520><c> of</c><00:40:53.760><c> people</c><00:40:53.920><c> with</c><00:40:54.079><c> gender</c>

00:40:54.390 --> 00:40:54.400 align:start position:0%
treat the symptoms of people with gender
 

00:40:54.400 --> 00:40:55.910 align:start position:0%
treat the symptoms of people with gender
dysphoria.<00:40:55.040><c> However,</c><00:40:55.359><c> there</c><00:40:55.520><c> are</c><00:40:55.680><c> other</c>

00:40:55.910 --> 00:40:55.920 align:start position:0%
dysphoria. However, there are other
 

00:40:55.920 --> 00:40:57.750 align:start position:0%
dysphoria. However, there are other
truths<00:40:56.400><c> that</c><00:40:56.720><c> don't</c><00:40:56.960><c> fall</c><00:40:57.119><c> in</c><00:40:57.359><c> line</c><00:40:57.440><c> with</c><00:40:57.599><c> the</c>

00:40:57.750 --> 00:40:57.760 align:start position:0%
truths that don't fall in line with the
 

00:40:57.760 --> 00:41:00.069 align:start position:0%
truths that don't fall in line with the
ideology<00:40:58.160><c> of</c><00:40:58.400><c> trans</c><00:40:58.720><c> activists</c><00:40:59.280><c> either.</c><00:40:59.920><c> For</c>

00:41:00.069 --> 00:41:00.079 align:start position:0%
ideology of trans activists either. For
 

00:41:00.079 --> 00:41:01.910 align:start position:0%
ideology of trans activists either. For
example,<00:41:00.560><c> while</c><00:41:00.800><c> it</c><00:41:00.960><c> is</c><00:41:01.119><c> true</c><00:41:01.280><c> that</c><00:41:01.599><c> when</c><00:41:01.760><c> you</c>

00:41:01.910 --> 00:41:01.920 align:start position:0%
example, while it is true that when you
 

00:41:01.920 --> 00:41:03.829 align:start position:0%
example, while it is true that when you
scan<00:41:02.240><c> trans</c><00:41:02.560><c> women's</c><00:41:02.960><c> brains,</c><00:41:03.359><c> you</c><00:41:03.599><c> discover</c>

00:41:03.829 --> 00:41:03.839 align:start position:0%
scan trans women's brains, you discover
 

00:41:03.839 --> 00:41:05.670 align:start position:0%
scan trans women's brains, you discover
they<00:41:04.160><c> have</c><00:41:04.319><c> some</c><00:41:04.560><c> commonalities</c><00:41:05.200><c> with</c><00:41:05.440><c> cis</c>

00:41:05.670 --> 00:41:05.680 align:start position:0%
they have some commonalities with cis
 

00:41:05.680 --> 00:41:07.589 align:start position:0%
they have some commonalities with cis
women<00:41:05.920><c> brain</c><00:41:06.240><c> scans,</c><00:41:06.800><c> it's</c><00:41:07.040><c> also</c><00:41:07.280><c> true</c><00:41:07.440><c> that</c>

00:41:07.589 --> 00:41:07.599 align:start position:0%
women brain scans, it's also true that
 

00:41:07.599 --> 00:41:09.030 align:start position:0%
women brain scans, it's also true that
they<00:41:07.760><c> have</c><00:41:07.839><c> a</c><00:41:08.079><c> lot</c><00:41:08.160><c> of</c><00:41:08.240><c> commonalities</c><00:41:08.800><c> with</c>

00:41:09.030 --> 00:41:09.040 align:start position:0%
they have a lot of commonalities with
 

00:41:09.040 --> 00:41:11.589 align:start position:0%
they have a lot of commonalities with
gay<00:41:09.359><c> men's</c><00:41:09.760><c> brain</c><00:41:10.079><c> scans,</c><00:41:10.560><c> too.</c><00:41:11.040><c> And</c><00:41:11.280><c> when</c><00:41:11.440><c> you</c>

00:41:11.589 --> 00:41:11.599 align:start position:0%
gay men's brain scans, too. And when you
 

00:41:11.599 --> 00:41:13.349 align:start position:0%
gay men's brain scans, too. And when you
control<00:41:11.920><c> for</c><00:41:12.160><c> the</c><00:41:12.319><c> differences</c><00:41:12.880><c> between</c>

00:41:13.349 --> 00:41:13.359 align:start position:0%
control for the differences between
 

00:41:13.359 --> 00:41:15.829 align:start position:0%
control for the differences between
straight<00:41:13.760><c> men's</c><00:41:14.240><c> brain</c><00:41:14.560><c> scans</c><00:41:14.960><c> and</c><00:41:15.119><c> gay</c><00:41:15.440><c> men's</c>

00:41:15.829 --> 00:41:15.839 align:start position:0%
straight men's brain scans and gay men's
 

00:41:15.839 --> 00:41:18.230 align:start position:0%
straight men's brain scans and gay men's
brain<00:41:16.160><c> scans,</c><00:41:16.720><c> trans</c><00:41:17.040><c> women's</c><00:41:17.440><c> brain</c><00:41:17.760><c> scans</c>

00:41:18.230 --> 00:41:18.240 align:start position:0%
brain scans, trans women's brain scans
 

00:41:18.240 --> 00:41:20.470 align:start position:0%
brain scans, trans women's brain scans
are<00:41:18.560><c> almost</c><00:41:19.040><c> identical</c><00:41:19.440><c> to</c><00:41:19.760><c> men's</c><00:41:20.160><c> brain</c>

00:41:20.470 --> 00:41:20.480 align:start position:0%
are almost identical to men's brain
 

00:41:20.480 --> 00:41:22.230 align:start position:0%
are almost identical to men's brain
scans<00:41:21.040><c> with</c><00:41:21.200><c> the</c><00:41:21.359><c> exception</c><00:41:21.680><c> of</c><00:41:21.839><c> the</c><00:41:22.000><c> area</c>

00:41:22.230 --> 00:41:22.240 align:start position:0%
scans with the exception of the area
 

00:41:22.240 --> 00:41:24.550 align:start position:0%
scans with the exception of the area
that<00:41:22.560><c> governs</c><00:41:22.960><c> self-perception.</c><00:41:24.000><c> This</c><00:41:24.240><c> is</c><00:41:24.319><c> a</c>

00:41:24.550 --> 00:41:24.560 align:start position:0%
that governs self-perception. This is a
 

00:41:24.560 --> 00:41:25.990 align:start position:0%
that governs self-perception. This is a
truth<00:41:24.720><c> that</c><00:41:24.880><c> a</c><00:41:25.040><c> lot</c><00:41:25.119><c> of</c><00:41:25.280><c> trans</c><00:41:25.520><c> activists</c>

00:41:25.990 --> 00:41:26.000 align:start position:0%
truth that a lot of trans activists
 

00:41:26.000 --> 00:41:27.589 align:start position:0%
truth that a lot of trans activists
really<00:41:26.240><c> don't</c><00:41:26.480><c> like</c><00:41:26.720><c> because</c><00:41:27.040><c> it</c><00:41:27.200><c> points</c><00:41:27.440><c> to</c>

00:41:27.589 --> 00:41:27.599 align:start position:0%
really don't like because it points to
 

00:41:27.599 --> 00:41:29.190 align:start position:0%
really don't like because it points to
trans<00:41:27.920><c> women</c><00:41:28.160><c> being</c><00:41:28.400><c> more</c><00:41:28.560><c> closely</c><00:41:28.960><c> related</c>

00:41:29.190 --> 00:41:29.200 align:start position:0%
trans women being more closely related
 

00:41:29.200 --> 00:41:30.870 align:start position:0%
trans women being more closely related
to<00:41:29.359><c> gay</c><00:41:29.520><c> men</c><00:41:29.760><c> than</c><00:41:29.920><c> they</c><00:41:30.000><c> want</c><00:41:30.160><c> to</c><00:41:30.240><c> admit.</c><00:41:30.720><c> But</c>

00:41:30.870 --> 00:41:30.880 align:start position:0%
to gay men than they want to admit. But
 

00:41:30.880 --> 00:41:33.190 align:start position:0%
to gay men than they want to admit. But
it<00:41:31.040><c> is</c><00:41:31.280><c> nonetheless</c><00:41:32.000><c> true.</c><00:41:32.640><c> Same</c><00:41:32.960><c> thing</c><00:41:33.040><c> with</c>

00:41:33.190 --> 00:41:33.200 align:start position:0%
it is nonetheless true. Same thing with
 

00:41:33.200 --> 00:41:34.550 align:start position:0%
it is nonetheless true. Same thing with
the<00:41:33.359><c> trans</c><00:41:33.599><c> women</c><00:41:33.760><c> and</c><00:41:34.000><c> women</c><00:41:34.240><c> sports</c>

00:41:34.550 --> 00:41:34.560 align:start position:0%
the trans women and women sports
 

00:41:34.560 --> 00:41:35.670 align:start position:0%
the trans women and women sports
conversation,<00:41:35.040><c> which</c><00:41:35.280><c> I've</c><00:41:35.440><c> covered</c>

00:41:35.670 --> 00:41:35.680 align:start position:0%
conversation, which I've covered
 

00:41:35.680 --> 00:41:37.109 align:start position:0%
conversation, which I've covered
multiple<00:41:36.000><c> times</c><00:41:36.160><c> in</c><00:41:36.319><c> this</c><00:41:36.480><c> channel</c><00:41:36.720><c> now,</c><00:41:36.960><c> so</c>

00:41:37.109 --> 00:41:37.119 align:start position:0%
multiple times in this channel now, so
 

00:41:37.119 --> 00:41:38.309 align:start position:0%
multiple times in this channel now, so
we<00:41:37.280><c> don't</c><00:41:37.359><c> got</c><00:41:37.440><c> to</c><00:41:37.520><c> get</c><00:41:37.680><c> into</c><00:41:37.760><c> it.</c><00:41:38.079><c> But</c><00:41:38.160><c> the</c>

00:41:38.309 --> 00:41:38.319 align:start position:0%
we don't got to get into it. But the
 

00:41:38.319 --> 00:41:40.710 align:start position:0%
we don't got to get into it. But the
TLDDR<00:41:38.960><c> is</c><00:41:39.200><c> you've</c><00:41:39.440><c> got</c><00:41:39.520><c> to</c><00:41:39.680><c> be</c><00:41:39.760><c> on</c><00:41:39.920><c> HRT</c><00:41:40.560><c> for</c>

00:41:40.710 --> 00:41:40.720 align:start position:0%
TLDDR is you've got to be on HRT for
 

00:41:40.720 --> 00:41:42.790 align:start position:0%
TLDDR is you've got to be on HRT for
like<00:41:41.119><c> 5</c><00:41:41.440><c> years</c><00:41:41.839><c> before</c><00:41:42.160><c> the</c><00:41:42.319><c> advantage</c><00:41:42.640><c> of</c>

00:41:42.790 --> 00:41:42.800 align:start position:0%
like 5 years before the advantage of
 

00:41:42.800 --> 00:41:44.710 align:start position:0%
like 5 years before the advantage of
male<00:41:43.119><c> puberty</c><00:41:43.520><c> begins</c><00:41:43.680><c> to</c><00:41:43.839><c> subside.</c><00:41:44.400><c> And</c><00:41:44.560><c> for</c>

00:41:44.710 --> 00:41:44.720 align:start position:0%
male puberty begins to subside. And for
 

00:41:44.720 --> 00:41:46.470 align:start position:0%
male puberty begins to subside. And for
a<00:41:44.880><c> lot</c><00:41:44.960><c> of</c><00:41:45.119><c> sports,</c><00:41:45.599><c> that</c><00:41:45.760><c> means</c><00:41:46.000><c> that</c><00:41:46.160><c> trans</c>

00:41:46.470 --> 00:41:46.480 align:start position:0%
a lot of sports, that means that trans
 

00:41:46.480 --> 00:41:47.910 align:start position:0%
a lot of sports, that means that trans
women<00:41:46.800><c> just</c><00:41:47.040><c> can't</c><00:41:47.280><c> compete</c><00:41:47.599><c> at</c><00:41:47.760><c> the</c>

00:41:47.910 --> 00:41:47.920 align:start position:0%
women just can't compete at the
 

00:41:47.920 --> 00:41:49.750 align:start position:0%
women just can't compete at the
professional<00:41:48.240><c> level</c><00:41:48.480><c> without</c><00:41:48.800><c> starting</c><00:41:49.200><c> HRT</c>

00:41:49.750 --> 00:41:49.760 align:start position:0%
professional level without starting HRT
 

00:41:49.760 --> 00:41:51.750 align:start position:0%
professional level without starting HRT
while<00:41:49.920><c> underage.</c><00:41:50.560><c> Sucks</c><00:41:50.880><c> for</c><00:41:51.040><c> them.</c><00:41:51.280><c> But</c><00:41:51.440><c> I</c><00:41:51.599><c> am</c>

00:41:51.750 --> 00:41:51.760 align:start position:0%
while underage. Sucks for them. But I am
 

00:41:51.760 --> 00:41:53.510 align:start position:0%
while underage. Sucks for them. But I am
only<00:41:52.000><c> interested</c><00:41:52.319><c> in</c><00:41:52.480><c> what</c><00:41:52.640><c> is</c><00:41:52.880><c> true,</c><00:41:53.280><c> not</c>

00:41:53.510 --> 00:41:53.520 align:start position:0%
only interested in what is true, not
 

00:41:53.520 --> 00:41:55.190 align:start position:0%
only interested in what is true, not
what<00:41:53.680><c> is</c><00:41:53.839><c> good</c><00:41:54.000><c> for</c><00:41:54.160><c> the</c><00:41:54.319><c> political</c><00:41:54.640><c> activists</c>

00:41:55.190 --> 00:41:55.200 align:start position:0%
what is good for the political activists
 

00:41:55.200 --> 00:41:57.589 align:start position:0%
what is good for the political activists
on<00:41:55.440><c> either</c><00:41:55.680><c> the</c><00:41:55.920><c> left</c><00:41:56.160><c> or</c><00:41:56.400><c> the</c><00:41:56.560><c> right.</c><00:41:57.200><c> This</c><00:41:57.440><c> is</c>

00:41:57.589 --> 00:41:57.599 align:start position:0%
on either the left or the right. This is
 

00:41:57.599 --> 00:41:59.829 align:start position:0%
on either the left or the right. This is
why<00:41:57.839><c> I</c><00:41:58.079><c> reject</c><00:41:58.480><c> Sargon's</c><00:41:59.040><c> argument.</c><00:41:59.440><c> It</c><00:41:59.680><c> is</c>

00:41:59.829 --> 00:41:59.839 align:start position:0%
why I reject Sargon's argument. It is
 

00:41:59.839 --> 00:42:01.510 align:start position:0%
why I reject Sargon's argument. It is
fundamentally<00:42:00.319><c> the</c><00:42:00.560><c> same</c><00:42:00.640><c> as</c><00:42:00.800><c> Niara's.</c>

00:42:01.510 --> 00:42:01.520 align:start position:0%
fundamentally the same as Niara's.
 

00:42:01.520 --> 00:42:03.589 align:start position:0%
fundamentally the same as Niara's.
They're<00:42:01.760><c> both</c><00:42:02.000><c> saying</c><00:42:02.400><c> there</c><00:42:02.640><c> is</c><00:42:02.880><c> no</c><00:42:03.119><c> neutral</c>

00:42:03.589 --> 00:42:03.599 align:start position:0%
They're both saying there is no neutral
 

00:42:03.599 --> 00:42:05.910 align:start position:0%
They're both saying there is no neutral
space.<00:42:04.000><c> You</c><00:42:04.160><c> must</c><00:42:04.400><c> join</c><00:42:04.640><c> us</c><00:42:04.800><c> or</c><00:42:05.119><c> join</c><00:42:05.359><c> them.</c>

00:42:05.910 --> 00:42:05.920 align:start position:0%
space. You must join us or join them.
 

00:42:05.920 --> 00:42:07.990 align:start position:0%
space. You must join us or join them.
However,<00:42:06.319><c> the</c><00:42:06.560><c> truth</c><00:42:06.880><c> is</c><00:42:07.200><c> actually</c><00:42:07.599><c> found</c><00:42:07.839><c> in</c>

00:42:07.990 --> 00:42:08.000 align:start position:0%
However, the truth is actually found in
 

00:42:08.000 --> 00:42:09.670 align:start position:0%
However, the truth is actually found in
the<00:42:08.160><c> neutral</c><00:42:08.480><c> space.</c><00:42:08.880><c> So</c><00:42:09.040><c> that's</c><00:42:09.200><c> where</c><00:42:09.359><c> I</c><00:42:09.520><c> am</c>

00:42:09.670 --> 00:42:09.680 align:start position:0%
the neutral space. So that's where I am
 

00:42:09.680 --> 00:42:11.510 align:start position:0%
the neutral space. So that's where I am
and<00:42:09.839><c> I'm</c><00:42:10.000><c> not</c><00:42:10.160><c> moving</c><00:42:10.319><c> off</c><00:42:10.480><c> of</c><00:42:10.640><c> it.</c><00:42:11.040><c> Yeah,</c><00:42:11.280><c> it's</c>

00:42:11.510 --> 00:42:11.520 align:start position:0%
and I'm not moving off of it. Yeah, it's
 

00:42:11.520 --> 00:42:13.030 align:start position:0%
and I'm not moving off of it. Yeah, it's
true.<00:42:11.839><c> People</c><00:42:12.000><c> to</c><00:42:12.240><c> the</c><00:42:12.319><c> left</c><00:42:12.480><c> of</c><00:42:12.640><c> me</c><00:42:12.800><c> got</c>

00:42:13.030 --> 00:42:13.040 align:start position:0%
true. People to the left of me got
 

00:42:13.040 --> 00:42:14.550 align:start position:0%
true. People to the left of me got
thousands<00:42:13.440><c> of</c><00:42:13.520><c> likes</c><00:42:13.839><c> while</c><00:42:14.000><c> I</c><00:42:14.240><c> only</c><00:42:14.400><c> got</c>

00:42:14.550 --> 00:42:14.560 align:start position:0%
thousands of likes while I only got
 

00:42:14.560 --> 00:42:15.990 align:start position:0%
thousands of likes while I only got
hundreds.<00:42:15.040><c> But</c><00:42:15.200><c> I</c><00:42:15.440><c> don't</c><00:42:15.599><c> believe</c><00:42:15.760><c> that's</c>

00:42:15.990 --> 00:42:16.000 align:start position:0%
hundreds. But I don't believe that's
 

00:42:16.000 --> 00:42:18.069 align:start position:0%
hundreds. But I don't believe that's
indicative<00:42:16.480><c> of</c><00:42:16.640><c> the</c><00:42:16.880><c> real</c><00:42:17.119><c> world</c><00:42:17.599><c> because,</c>

00:42:18.069 --> 00:42:18.079 align:start position:0%
indicative of the real world because,
 

00:42:18.079 --> 00:42:19.670 align:start position:0%
indicative of the real world because,
and<00:42:18.240><c> this</c><00:42:18.400><c> might</c><00:42:18.560><c> be</c><00:42:18.640><c> hard</c><00:42:18.880><c> to</c><00:42:18.960><c> accept,</c><00:42:19.440><c> I'm</c>

00:42:19.670 --> 00:42:19.680 align:start position:0%
and this might be hard to accept, I'm
 

00:42:19.680 --> 00:42:21.510 align:start position:0%
and this might be hard to accept, I'm
not<00:42:19.920><c> actually</c><00:42:20.240><c> terminally</c><00:42:20.720><c> online.</c><00:42:21.359><c> But</c>

00:42:21.510 --> 00:42:21.520 align:start position:0%
not actually terminally online. But
 

00:42:21.520 --> 00:42:23.510 align:start position:0%
not actually terminally online. But
okay,<00:42:21.839><c> let's</c><00:42:22.079><c> assume</c><00:42:22.319><c> this</c><00:42:22.560><c> ratio</c><00:42:23.040><c> does</c><00:42:23.280><c> in</c>

00:42:23.510 --> 00:42:23.520 align:start position:0%
okay, let's assume this ratio does in
 

00:42:23.520 --> 00:42:25.430 align:start position:0%
okay, let's assume this ratio does in
fact<00:42:23.680><c> reflect</c><00:42:24.000><c> the</c><00:42:24.240><c> real</c><00:42:24.400><c> world.</c><00:42:24.880><c> Most</c><00:42:25.200><c> people</c>

00:42:25.430 --> 00:42:25.440 align:start position:0%
fact reflect the real world. Most people
 

00:42:25.440 --> 00:42:27.589 align:start position:0%
fact reflect the real world. Most people
have<00:42:25.760><c> actually</c><00:42:26.079><c> chosen</c><00:42:26.400><c> sides</c><00:42:26.800><c> and</c><00:42:27.040><c> my</c><00:42:27.280><c> tiny</c>

00:42:27.589 --> 00:42:27.599 align:start position:0%
have actually chosen sides and my tiny
 

00:42:27.599 --> 00:42:29.829 align:start position:0%
have actually chosen sides and my tiny
centrist<00:42:28.079><c> camp</c><00:42:28.319><c> is</c><00:42:28.560><c> being</c><00:42:28.720><c> squeezed</c><00:42:29.119><c> out.</c><00:42:29.599><c> So</c>

00:42:29.829 --> 00:42:29.839 align:start position:0%
centrist camp is being squeezed out. So
 

00:42:29.839 --> 00:42:31.589 align:start position:0%
centrist camp is being squeezed out. So
what?<00:42:30.400><c> Do</c><00:42:30.560><c> you</c><00:42:30.720><c> think</c><00:42:30.880><c> this</c><00:42:31.040><c> is</c><00:42:31.200><c> the</c><00:42:31.440><c> first</c>

00:42:31.589 --> 00:42:31.599 align:start position:0%
what? Do you think this is the first
 

00:42:31.599 --> 00:42:33.430 align:start position:0%
what? Do you think this is the first
time<00:42:31.920><c> I've</c><00:42:32.240><c> stood</c><00:42:32.400><c> in</c><00:42:32.560><c> front</c><00:42:32.640><c> of</c><00:42:32.720><c> a</c><00:42:32.960><c> mass</c><00:42:33.200><c> of</c>

00:42:33.430 --> 00:42:33.440 align:start position:0%
time I've stood in front of a mass of
 

00:42:33.440 --> 00:42:34.950 align:start position:0%
time I've stood in front of a mass of
idiots<00:42:33.760><c> before</c><00:42:34.079><c> and</c><00:42:34.319><c> told</c><00:42:34.480><c> them</c><00:42:34.640><c> they</c><00:42:34.800><c> were</c>

00:42:34.950 --> 00:42:34.960 align:start position:0%
idiots before and told them they were
 

00:42:34.960 --> 00:42:36.950 align:start position:0%
idiots before and told them they were
all<00:42:35.119><c> wrong?</c><00:42:35.599><c> I</c><00:42:35.839><c> used</c><00:42:35.920><c> to</c><00:42:36.079><c> do</c><00:42:36.240><c> it</c><00:42:36.400><c> every</c><00:42:36.720><c> single</c>

00:42:36.950 --> 00:42:36.960 align:start position:0%
all wrong? I used to do it every single
 

00:42:36.960 --> 00:42:38.950 align:start position:0%
all wrong? I used to do it every single
week<00:42:37.119><c> on</c><00:42:37.280><c> Arch's</c><00:42:37.839><c> channel.</c><00:42:38.160><c> If</c><00:42:38.400><c> something</c><00:42:38.720><c> is</c>

00:42:38.950 --> 00:42:38.960 align:start position:0%
week on Arch's channel. If something is
 

00:42:38.960 --> 00:42:41.109 align:start position:0%
week on Arch's channel. If something is
true<00:42:39.359><c> but</c><00:42:39.520><c> unpopular,</c><00:42:40.319><c> you</c><00:42:40.480><c> should</c><00:42:40.720><c> stick</c><00:42:40.960><c> to</c>

00:42:41.109 --> 00:42:41.119 align:start position:0%
true but unpopular, you should stick to
 

00:42:41.119 --> 00:42:43.109 align:start position:0%
true but unpopular, you should stick to
it,<00:42:41.440><c> even</c><00:42:41.680><c> if</c><00:42:41.839><c> it</c><00:42:42.079><c> costs</c><00:42:42.400><c> you.</c><00:42:42.640><c> My</c><00:42:42.880><c> core</c>

00:42:43.109 --> 00:42:43.119 align:start position:0%
it, even if it costs you. My core
 

00:42:43.119 --> 00:42:45.589 align:start position:0%
it, even if it costs you. My core
problem<00:42:43.359><c> with</c><00:42:43.599><c> 2026</c><00:42:44.240><c> Sargon</c><00:42:44.800><c> is</c><00:42:45.040><c> that</c><00:42:45.200><c> in</c><00:42:45.359><c> his</c>

00:42:45.589 --> 00:42:45.599 align:start position:0%
problem with 2026 Sargon is that in his
 

00:42:45.599 --> 00:42:47.190 align:start position:0%
problem with 2026 Sargon is that in his
descent<00:42:46.079><c> down</c><00:42:46.319><c> the</c><00:42:46.480><c> post-modern</c>

00:42:47.190 --> 00:42:47.200 align:start position:0%
descent down the post-modern
 

00:42:47.200 --> 00:42:49.030 align:start position:0%
descent down the post-modern
neo-reactionary<00:42:48.160><c> rabbit</c><00:42:48.480><c> hole,</c><00:42:48.800><c> he's</c>

00:42:49.030 --> 00:42:49.040 align:start position:0%
neo-reactionary rabbit hole, he's
 

00:42:49.040 --> 00:42:50.550 align:start position:0%
neo-reactionary rabbit hole, he's
developed<00:42:49.440><c> the</c><00:42:49.680><c> same</c><00:42:49.839><c> problem</c><00:42:50.079><c> in</c><00:42:50.319><c> his</c>

00:42:50.550 --> 00:42:50.560 align:start position:0%
developed the same problem in his
 

00:42:50.560 --> 00:42:52.950 align:start position:0%
developed the same problem in his
thinking<00:42:50.880><c> as</c><00:42:51.040><c> the</c><00:42:51.280><c> postmodern</c><00:42:51.839><c> neo-Marxists.</c>

00:42:52.950 --> 00:42:52.960 align:start position:0%
thinking as the postmodern neo-Marxists.
 

00:42:52.960 --> 00:42:55.349 align:start position:0%
thinking as the postmodern neo-Marxists.
He<00:42:53.200><c> regularly</c><00:42:53.680><c> rejects</c><00:42:54.240><c> truth</c><00:42:54.640><c> in</c><00:42:54.880><c> favor</c><00:42:55.200><c> of</c>

00:42:55.349 --> 00:42:55.359 align:start position:0%
He regularly rejects truth in favor of
 

00:42:55.359 --> 00:42:57.349 align:start position:0%
He regularly rejects truth in favor of
what<00:42:55.599><c> is</c><00:42:55.839><c> good</c><00:42:56.000><c> for</c><00:42:56.240><c> his</c><00:42:56.480><c> political</c><00:42:56.880><c> project.</c>

00:42:57.349 --> 00:42:57.359 align:start position:0%
what is good for his political project.
 

00:42:57.359 --> 00:42:58.950 align:start position:0%
what is good for his political project.
And<00:42:57.599><c> frankly,</c><00:42:58.000><c> I'm</c><00:42:58.240><c> just</c><00:42:58.400><c> not</c><00:42:58.560><c> built</c><00:42:58.800><c> like</c>

00:42:58.950 --> 00:42:58.960 align:start position:0%
And frankly, I'm just not built like
 

00:42:58.960 --> 00:43:00.470 align:start position:0%
And frankly, I'm just not built like
that.<00:42:59.119><c> And</c><00:42:59.359><c> Sargon</c><00:42:59.839><c> kind</c><00:42:59.920><c> of</c><00:43:00.000><c> knows</c><00:43:00.160><c> all</c><00:43:00.319><c> this,</c>

00:43:00.470 --> 00:43:00.480 align:start position:0%
that. And Sargon kind of knows all this,
 

00:43:00.480 --> 00:43:02.069 align:start position:0%
that. And Sargon kind of knows all this,
by<00:43:00.640><c> the</c><00:43:00.720><c> way.</c><00:43:00.880><c> He</c><00:43:01.119><c> tips</c><00:43:01.359><c> his</c><00:43:01.520><c> hand</c><00:43:01.599><c> a</c><00:43:01.760><c> bit</c><00:43:01.920><c> in</c>

00:43:02.069 --> 00:43:02.079 align:start position:0%
by the way. He tips his hand a bit in
 

00:43:02.079 --> 00:43:03.910 align:start position:0%
by the way. He tips his hand a bit in
this<00:43:02.240><c> next</c><00:43:02.400><c> segment.</c><00:43:02.800><c> I</c><00:43:03.040><c> mean</c><00:43:03.280><c> what</c><00:43:03.359><c> what</c><00:43:03.760><c> is</c>

00:43:03.910 --> 00:43:03.920 align:start position:0%
this next segment. I mean what what is
 

00:43:03.920 --> 00:43:06.069 align:start position:0%
this next segment. I mean what what is
interesting<00:43:04.319><c> about</c><00:43:04.480><c> this</c><00:43:04.720><c> is</c><00:43:05.040><c> that</c><00:43:05.440><c> the</c><00:43:05.760><c> trans</c>

00:43:06.069 --> 00:43:06.079 align:start position:0%
interesting about this is that the trans
 

00:43:06.079 --> 00:43:10.069 align:start position:0%
interesting about this is that the trans
argument<00:43:06.480><c> has</c><00:43:07.119><c> devolved</c><00:43:08.000><c> from</c><00:43:09.440><c> being</c>

00:43:10.069 --> 00:43:10.079 align:start position:0%
argument has devolved from being
 

00:43:10.079 --> 00:43:12.870 align:start position:0%
argument has devolved from being
idealistic<00:43:11.040><c> as</c><00:43:11.280><c> in</c><00:43:12.079><c> existing</c><00:43:12.480><c> in</c><00:43:12.640><c> the</c><00:43:12.800><c> world</c>

00:43:12.870 --> 00:43:12.880 align:start position:0%
idealistic as in existing in the world
 

00:43:12.880 --> 00:43:15.910 align:start position:0%
idealistic as in existing in the world
of<00:43:13.119><c> ideas</c><00:43:13.599><c> and</c><00:43:13.839><c> saying</c><00:43:14.079><c> well</c><00:43:14.319><c> look</c><00:43:15.520><c> actually</c>

00:43:15.910 --> 00:43:15.920 align:start position:0%
of ideas and saying well look actually
 

00:43:15.920 --> 00:43:18.150 align:start position:0%
of ideas and saying well look actually
we're<00:43:16.160><c> not</c><00:43:16.800><c> gender</c><00:43:17.200><c> essentialists.</c><00:43:18.000><c> We're</c>

00:43:18.150 --> 00:43:18.160 align:start position:0%
we're not gender essentialists. We're
 

00:43:18.160 --> 00:43:20.790 align:start position:0%
we're not gender essentialists. We're
not<00:43:18.240><c> biological</c><00:43:18.800><c> essentialists.</c><00:43:20.079><c> We</c><00:43:20.560><c> don't</c>

00:43:20.790 --> 00:43:20.800 align:start position:0%
not biological essentialists. We don't
 

00:43:20.800 --> 00:43:23.030 align:start position:0%
not biological essentialists. We don't
believe<00:43:21.440><c> that</c><00:43:21.760><c> the</c><00:43:22.000><c> physical</c><00:43:22.480><c> properties</c><00:43:22.880><c> of</c>

00:43:23.030 --> 00:43:23.040 align:start position:0%
believe that the physical properties of
 

00:43:23.040 --> 00:43:25.349 align:start position:0%
believe that the physical properties of
the<00:43:23.280><c> body</c><00:43:24.079><c> are</c><00:43:24.319><c> what</c><00:43:24.560><c> make</c><00:43:24.800><c> you</c><00:43:24.960><c> the</c><00:43:25.200><c> thing</c>

00:43:25.349 --> 00:43:25.359 align:start position:0%
the body are what make you the thing
 

00:43:25.359 --> 00:43:27.750 align:start position:0%
the body are what make you the thing
that<00:43:25.599><c> you</c><00:43:25.760><c> are.</c><00:43:26.160><c> Your</c><00:43:26.560><c> identity</c><00:43:26.880><c> is</c><00:43:27.200><c> not</c><00:43:27.440><c> drawn</c>

00:43:27.750 --> 00:43:27.760 align:start position:0%
that you are. Your identity is not drawn
 

00:43:27.760 --> 00:43:31.750 align:start position:0%
that you are. Your identity is not drawn
from<00:43:28.000><c> your</c><00:43:28.319><c> physical</c><00:43:29.520><c> um</c><00:43:30.000><c> attributes.</c><00:43:31.359><c> It</c><00:43:31.599><c> is</c>

00:43:31.750 --> 00:43:31.760 align:start position:0%
from your physical um attributes. It is
 

00:43:31.760 --> 00:43:33.190 align:start position:0%
from your physical um attributes. It is
something<00:43:31.920><c> that</c><00:43:32.079><c> is</c><00:43:32.319><c> chosen</c><00:43:32.640><c> for</c><00:43:32.800><c> you,</c><00:43:33.040><c> which</c>

00:43:33.190 --> 00:43:33.200 align:start position:0%
something that is chosen for you, which
 

00:43:33.200 --> 00:43:35.190 align:start position:0%
something that is chosen for you, which
is<00:43:33.359><c> what</c><00:43:33.520><c> the</c><00:43:33.680><c> liberal</c><00:43:34.079><c> wants</c><00:43:34.240><c> to</c><00:43:34.480><c> believe.</c>

00:43:35.190 --> 00:43:35.200 align:start position:0%
is what the liberal wants to believe.
 

00:43:35.200 --> 00:43:37.270 align:start position:0%
is what the liberal wants to believe.
But<00:43:35.440><c> notice</c><00:43:35.760><c> how</c><00:43:36.000><c> here</c><00:43:36.480><c> they</c><00:43:36.720><c> have</c><00:43:36.880><c> literally</c>

00:43:37.270 --> 00:43:37.280 align:start position:0%
But notice how here they have literally
 

00:43:37.280 --> 00:43:39.430 align:start position:0%
But notice how here they have literally
collapsed<00:43:37.760><c> that</c><00:43:38.079><c> back</c><00:43:38.319><c> into</c><00:43:38.720><c> on</c><00:43:39.040><c> the</c><00:43:39.200><c> other</c>

00:43:39.430 --> 00:43:39.440 align:start position:0%
collapsed that back into on the other
 

00:43:39.440 --> 00:43:41.750 align:start position:0%
collapsed that back into on the other
side<00:43:39.760><c> of</c><00:43:39.920><c> this.</c><00:43:40.880><c> No,</c><00:43:41.200><c> we</c><00:43:41.359><c> are</c><00:43:41.440><c> literally</c>

00:43:41.750 --> 00:43:41.760 align:start position:0%
side of this. No, we are literally
 

00:43:41.760 --> 00:43:43.910 align:start position:0%
side of this. No, we are literally
biological<00:43:42.319><c> females.</c><00:43:42.720><c> And</c><00:43:42.880><c> therefore,</c><00:43:43.680><c> we're</c>

00:43:43.910 --> 00:43:43.920 align:start position:0%
biological females. And therefore, we're
 

00:43:43.920 --> 00:43:45.589 align:start position:0%
biological females. And therefore, we're
going<00:43:44.000><c> to</c><00:43:44.079><c> make</c><00:43:44.240><c> the</c><00:43:44.400><c> gender</c><00:43:44.800><c> I</c><00:43:45.280><c> we're</c><00:43:45.520><c> going</c>

00:43:45.589 --> 00:43:45.599 align:start position:0%
going to make the gender I we're going
 

00:43:45.599 --> 00:43:46.950 align:start position:0%
going to make the gender I we're going
to<00:43:45.680><c> literally</c><00:43:46.079><c> make</c><00:43:46.240><c> the</c><00:43:46.400><c> biological</c>

00:43:46.950 --> 00:43:46.960 align:start position:0%
to literally make the biological
 

00:43:46.960 --> 00:43:49.190 align:start position:0%
to literally make the biological
essentialist<00:43:47.599><c> argument</c><00:43:48.079><c> regarding</c><00:43:48.480><c> gender.</c>

00:43:49.190 --> 00:43:49.200 align:start position:0%
essentialist argument regarding gender.
 

00:43:49.200 --> 00:43:51.510 align:start position:0%
essentialist argument regarding gender.
This<00:43:49.359><c> is</c><00:43:49.520><c> all</c><00:43:49.760><c> biological</c><00:43:50.319><c> essentialism.</c>

00:43:51.510 --> 00:43:51.520 align:start position:0%
This is all biological essentialism.
 

00:43:51.520 --> 00:43:54.950 align:start position:0%
This is all biological essentialism.
Biological<00:43:52.240><c> essentialism.</c><00:43:53.520><c> And</c><00:43:53.920><c> ultimately,</c>

00:43:54.950 --> 00:43:54.960 align:start position:0%
Biological essentialism. And ultimately,
 

00:43:54.960 --> 00:43:56.790 align:start position:0%
Biological essentialism. And ultimately,
what<00:43:55.200><c> that</c><00:43:55.440><c> means</c><00:43:55.599><c> is,</c><00:43:56.079><c> well,</c><00:43:56.319><c> I</c><00:43:56.480><c> get</c><00:43:56.640><c> to</c>

00:43:56.790 --> 00:43:56.800 align:start position:0%
what that means is, well, I get to
 

00:43:56.800 --> 00:43:59.349 align:start position:0%
what that means is, well, I get to
decide<00:43:57.200><c> if</c><00:43:57.440><c> that's</c><00:43:57.680><c> what</c><00:43:58.400><c> a</c><00:43:58.640><c> biological</c>

00:43:59.349 --> 00:43:59.359 align:start position:0%
decide if that's what a biological
 

00:43:59.359 --> 00:44:01.990 align:start position:0%
decide if that's what a biological
female<00:43:59.760><c> is.</c><00:44:00.480><c> And</c><00:44:00.720><c> if</c><00:44:00.880><c> your</c><00:44:01.119><c> chromosomes</c><00:44:01.599><c> and</c>

00:44:01.990 --> 00:44:02.000 align:start position:0%
female is. And if your chromosomes and
 

00:44:02.000 --> 00:44:03.910 align:start position:0%
female is. And if your chromosomes and
genitals<00:44:02.560><c> haven't</c><00:44:02.880><c> changed,</c><00:44:03.440><c> or</c><00:44:03.599><c> at</c><00:44:03.599><c> least,</c>

00:44:03.910 --> 00:44:03.920 align:start position:0%
genitals haven't changed, or at least,
 

00:44:03.920 --> 00:44:06.230 align:start position:0%
genitals haven't changed, or at least,
you<00:44:04.079><c> know,</c><00:44:04.240><c> they're</c><00:44:04.480><c> not</c><00:44:04.640><c> the</c><00:44:05.520><c> authentic</c><00:44:06.000><c> ones</c>

00:44:06.230 --> 00:44:06.240 align:start position:0%
you know, they're not the authentic ones
 

00:44:06.240 --> 00:44:08.309 align:start position:0%
you know, they're not the authentic ones
of<00:44:06.400><c> the</c><00:44:06.560><c> other</c><00:44:06.720><c> sex,</c><00:44:07.440><c> then</c><00:44:07.680><c> I</c><00:44:07.920><c> don't</c><00:44:08.079><c> agree</c>

00:44:08.309 --> 00:44:08.319 align:start position:0%
of the other sex, then I don't agree
 

00:44:08.319 --> 00:44:11.190 align:start position:0%
of the other sex, then I don't agree
that<00:44:08.480><c> you</c><00:44:08.640><c> have</c><00:44:08.800><c> changed</c><00:44:09.040><c> your</c><00:44:09.359><c> sex.</c><00:44:10.319><c> And</c><00:44:10.480><c> so</c><00:44:10.960><c> I</c>

00:44:11.190 --> 00:44:11.200 align:start position:0%
that you have changed your sex. And so I
 

00:44:11.200 --> 00:44:12.550 align:start position:0%
that you have changed your sex. And so I
can<00:44:11.440><c> actually</c><00:44:11.760><c> trump</c><00:44:12.079><c> this</c><00:44:12.240><c> with</c><00:44:12.480><c> the</c>

00:44:12.550 --> 00:44:12.560 align:start position:0%
can actually trump this with the
 

00:44:12.560 --> 00:44:15.349 align:start position:0%
can actually trump this with the
biological<00:44:13.119><c> essentialism</c><00:44:14.079><c> of</c><00:44:14.800><c> there</c><00:44:15.040><c> is</c><00:44:15.200><c> no</c>

00:44:15.349 --> 00:44:15.359 align:start position:0%
biological essentialism of there is no
 

00:44:15.359 --> 00:44:19.030 align:start position:0%
biological essentialism of there is no
such<00:44:15.599><c> thing</c><00:44:15.680><c> as</c><00:44:15.839><c> a</c><00:44:16.000><c> woman's</c><00:44:16.319><c> penis.</c>

00:44:19.030 --> 00:44:19.040 align:start position:0%
such thing as a woman's penis.
 

00:44:19.040 --> 00:44:22.790 align:start position:0%
such thing as a woman's penis.
Just<00:44:19.359><c> saying.</c><00:44:20.079><c> Dev</c><00:44:20.480><c> seems</c><00:44:21.359><c> to</c><00:44:21.839><c> uh</c><00:44:22.319><c> have</c><00:44:22.560><c> missed</c>

00:44:22.790 --> 00:44:22.800 align:start position:0%
Just saying. Dev seems to uh have missed
 

00:44:22.800 --> 00:44:24.870 align:start position:0%
Just saying. Dev seems to uh have missed
the<00:44:23.040><c> point.</c><00:44:24.000><c> Apparently,</c><00:44:24.400><c> this</c><00:44:24.560><c> isn't</c><00:44:24.800><c> the</c>

00:44:24.870 --> 00:44:24.880 align:start position:0%
the point. Apparently, this isn't the
 

00:44:24.880 --> 00:44:26.470 align:start position:0%
the point. Apparently, this isn't the
woke<00:44:25.280><c> position,</c><00:44:25.599><c> though,</c><00:44:25.839><c> which</c><00:44:26.000><c> Dev</c><00:44:26.319><c> would</c>

00:44:26.470 --> 00:44:26.480 align:start position:0%
woke position, though, which Dev would
 

00:44:26.480 --> 00:44:28.230 align:start position:0%
woke position, though, which Dev would
agree<00:44:26.720><c> with.</c><00:44:27.040><c> He's</c><00:44:27.280><c> not</c><00:44:27.440><c> trying</c><00:44:27.599><c> to</c><00:44:27.760><c> be</c><00:44:27.839><c> woke</c>

00:44:28.230 --> 00:44:28.240 align:start position:0%
agree with. He's not trying to be woke
 

00:44:28.240 --> 00:44:30.150 align:start position:0%
agree with. He's not trying to be woke
here.<00:44:28.720><c> He's</c><00:44:28.880><c> trying</c><00:44:29.040><c> to</c><00:44:29.200><c> be</c><00:44:29.280><c> liberal.</c><00:44:29.839><c> Yeah,</c>

00:44:30.150 --> 00:44:30.160 align:start position:0%
here. He's trying to be liberal. Yeah,
 

00:44:30.160 --> 00:44:31.990 align:start position:0%
here. He's trying to be liberal. Yeah,
what<00:44:30.319><c> he's</c><00:44:30.560><c> getting</c><00:44:30.640><c> at</c><00:44:30.880><c> here</c><00:44:31.200><c> is</c><00:44:31.359><c> that</c><00:44:31.680><c> both</c>

00:44:31.990 --> 00:44:32.000 align:start position:0%
what he's getting at here is that both
 

00:44:32.000 --> 00:44:33.990 align:start position:0%
what he's getting at here is that both
camps<00:44:32.400><c> are</c><00:44:32.640><c> actually</c><00:44:33.119><c> ignoring</c><00:44:33.680><c> different</c>

00:44:33.990 --> 00:44:34.000 align:start position:0%
camps are actually ignoring different
 

00:44:34.000 --> 00:44:36.069 align:start position:0%
camps are actually ignoring different
bits<00:44:34.319><c> of</c><00:44:34.480><c> the</c><00:44:34.640><c> truth</c><00:44:35.040><c> because</c><00:44:35.359><c> it</c><00:44:35.599><c> hurts</c><00:44:35.920><c> their</c>

00:44:36.069 --> 00:44:36.079 align:start position:0%
bits of the truth because it hurts their
 

00:44:36.079 --> 00:44:38.150 align:start position:0%
bits of the truth because it hurts their
politics.<00:44:36.720><c> For</c><00:44:36.960><c> Sargon,</c><00:44:37.599><c> he's</c><00:44:37.839><c> ignoring</c>

00:44:38.150 --> 00:44:38.160 align:start position:0%
politics. For Sargon, he's ignoring
 

00:44:38.160 --> 00:44:39.750 align:start position:0%
politics. For Sargon, he's ignoring
gender<00:44:38.480><c> dysphoria</c><00:44:39.119><c> and</c><00:44:39.280><c> the</c><00:44:39.440><c> passing</c>

00:44:39.750 --> 00:44:39.760 align:start position:0%
gender dysphoria and the passing
 

00:44:39.760 --> 00:44:41.349 align:start position:0%
gender dysphoria and the passing
principle,<00:44:40.240><c> while</c><00:44:40.400><c> for</c><00:44:40.640><c> trans</c><00:44:40.880><c> activists,</c>

00:44:41.349 --> 00:44:41.359 align:start position:0%
principle, while for trans activists,
 

00:44:41.359 --> 00:44:42.550 align:start position:0%
principle, while for trans activists,
they're<00:44:41.599><c> ignoring</c><00:44:41.839><c> the</c><00:44:42.000><c> fact</c><00:44:42.160><c> that</c><00:44:42.319><c> trans</c>

00:44:42.550 --> 00:44:42.560 align:start position:0%
they're ignoring the fact that trans
 

00:44:42.560 --> 00:44:44.470 align:start position:0%
they're ignoring the fact that trans
women<00:44:42.880><c> don't</c><00:44:43.119><c> have</c><00:44:43.280><c> functioning</c><00:44:43.760><c> ovaries</c><00:44:44.240><c> and</c>

00:44:44.470 --> 00:44:44.480 align:start position:0%
women don't have functioning ovaries and
 

00:44:44.480 --> 00:44:47.030 align:start position:0%
women don't have functioning ovaries and
uteruses.<00:44:45.359><c> Neither</c><00:44:45.760><c> of</c><00:44:45.920><c> these</c><00:44:46.240><c> positions</c><00:44:46.720><c> is</c>

00:44:47.030 --> 00:44:47.040 align:start position:0%
uteruses. Neither of these positions is
 

00:44:47.040 --> 00:44:48.870 align:start position:0%
uteruses. Neither of these positions is
sufficient<00:44:47.520><c> to</c><00:44:47.760><c> actually</c><00:44:48.079><c> describe</c><00:44:48.400><c> the</c><00:44:48.640><c> full</c>

00:44:48.870 --> 00:44:48.880 align:start position:0%
sufficient to actually describe the full
 

00:44:48.880 --> 00:44:50.550 align:start position:0%
sufficient to actually describe the full
reality<00:44:49.119><c> of</c><00:44:49.280><c> what's</c><00:44:49.520><c> going</c><00:44:49.680><c> on</c><00:44:49.839><c> here.</c><00:44:50.319><c> And</c>

00:44:50.550 --> 00:44:50.560 align:start position:0%
reality of what's going on here. And
 

00:44:50.560 --> 00:44:53.109 align:start position:0%
reality of what's going on here. And
this<00:44:50.880><c> is</c><00:44:51.119><c> that</c><00:44:51.520><c> full</c><00:44:51.760><c> reality.</c><00:44:52.480><c> Trans</c><00:44:52.800><c> women</c>

00:44:53.109 --> 00:44:53.119 align:start position:0%
this is that full reality. Trans women
 

00:44:53.119 --> 00:44:55.349 align:start position:0%
this is that full reality. Trans women
do<00:44:53.440><c> in</c><00:44:53.680><c> fact</c><00:44:53.920><c> represent</c><00:44:54.319><c> a</c><00:44:54.560><c> third</c><00:44:54.800><c> gender.</c>

00:44:55.349 --> 00:44:55.359 align:start position:0%
do in fact represent a third gender.
 

00:44:55.359 --> 00:44:56.710 align:start position:0%
do in fact represent a third gender.
This<00:44:55.680><c> does</c><00:44:55.839><c> not</c><00:44:56.000><c> mean</c><00:44:56.160><c> that</c><00:44:56.319><c> there</c><00:44:56.480><c> are</c>

00:44:56.710 --> 00:44:56.720 align:start position:0%
This does not mean that there are
 

00:44:56.720 --> 00:44:58.470 align:start position:0%
This does not mean that there are
infinite<00:44:57.119><c> genders</c><00:44:57.520><c> or</c><00:44:57.760><c> anything,</c><00:44:58.000><c> but</c><00:44:58.240><c> that</c>

00:44:58.470 --> 00:44:58.480 align:start position:0%
infinite genders or anything, but that
 

00:44:58.480 --> 00:45:00.870 align:start position:0%
infinite genders or anything, but that
the<00:44:58.720><c> experience</c><00:44:59.280><c> of</c><00:44:59.599><c> being</c><00:44:59.920><c> a</c><00:45:00.160><c> transw</c><00:45:00.560><c> woman</c>

00:45:00.870 --> 00:45:00.880 align:start position:0%
the experience of being a transw woman
 

00:45:00.880 --> 00:45:02.470 align:start position:0%
the experience of being a transw woman
is<00:45:01.119><c> sufficiently</c><00:45:01.760><c> different</c><00:45:02.079><c> from</c><00:45:02.319><c> the</c>

00:45:02.470 --> 00:45:02.480 align:start position:0%
is sufficiently different from the
 

00:45:02.480 --> 00:45:04.790 align:start position:0%
is sufficiently different from the
experiences<00:45:03.040><c> of</c><00:45:03.280><c> being</c><00:45:03.520><c> both</c><00:45:03.760><c> a</c><00:45:04.000><c> man</c><00:45:04.240><c> and</c><00:45:04.560><c> a</c>

00:45:04.790 --> 00:45:04.800 align:start position:0%
experiences of being both a man and a
 

00:45:04.800 --> 00:45:07.510 align:start position:0%
experiences of being both a man and a
woman.<00:45:05.280><c> Trans</c><00:45:05.599><c> activists</c><00:45:06.240><c> hate</c><00:45:06.640><c> this</c><00:45:07.119><c> because</c>

00:45:07.510 --> 00:45:07.520 align:start position:0%
woman. Trans activists hate this because
 

00:45:07.520 --> 00:45:09.829 align:start position:0%
woman. Trans activists hate this because
they<00:45:07.839><c> want</c><00:45:08.079><c> trans</c><00:45:08.400><c> women</c><00:45:08.720><c> to</c><00:45:08.960><c> be</c><00:45:09.200><c> completely</c>

00:45:09.829 --> 00:45:09.839 align:start position:0%
they want trans women to be completely
 

00:45:09.839 --> 00:45:11.910 align:start position:0%
they want trans women to be completely
identical<00:45:10.319><c> to</c><00:45:10.480><c> sis</c><00:45:10.800><c> women</c><00:45:11.119><c> where</c><00:45:11.280><c> there's</c><00:45:11.680><c> no</c>

00:45:11.910 --> 00:45:11.920 align:start position:0%
identical to sis women where there's no
 

00:45:11.920 --> 00:45:13.670 align:start position:0%
identical to sis women where there's no
way<00:45:12.079><c> to</c><00:45:12.240><c> differentiate</c><00:45:12.800><c> between</c><00:45:13.040><c> them.</c><00:45:13.440><c> But</c>

00:45:13.670 --> 00:45:13.680 align:start position:0%
way to differentiate between them. But
 

00:45:13.680 --> 00:45:15.829 align:start position:0%
way to differentiate between them. But
this<00:45:13.920><c> just</c><00:45:14.319><c> isn't</c><00:45:14.720><c> true</c><00:45:15.040><c> and</c><00:45:15.280><c> they</c><00:45:15.440><c> can</c><00:45:15.599><c> keep</c>

00:45:15.829 --> 00:45:15.839 align:start position:0%
this just isn't true and they can keep
 

00:45:15.839 --> 00:45:17.910 align:start position:0%
this just isn't true and they can keep
coping,<00:45:16.400><c> seething,</c><00:45:16.880><c> and</c><00:45:17.119><c> dilating</c><00:45:17.599><c> about</c><00:45:17.760><c> it</c>

00:45:17.910 --> 00:45:17.920 align:start position:0%
coping, seething, and dilating about it
 

00:45:17.920 --> 00:45:19.510 align:start position:0%
coping, seething, and dilating about it
because<00:45:18.160><c> they're</c><00:45:18.319><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:45:18.640><c> wrong.</c><00:45:19.119><c> But</c><00:45:19.280><c> the</c>

00:45:19.510 --> 00:45:19.520 align:start position:0%
because they're [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] wrong. But the
 

00:45:19.520 --> 00:45:21.829 align:start position:0%
because they're [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] wrong. But the
anti-trans<00:45:20.240><c> activists</c><00:45:20.800><c> are</c><00:45:20.960><c> also</c><00:45:21.280><c> wrong</c><00:45:21.520><c> when</c>

00:45:21.829 --> 00:45:21.839 align:start position:0%
anti-trans activists are also wrong when
 

00:45:21.839 --> 00:45:23.910 align:start position:0%
anti-trans activists are also wrong when
they<00:45:22.000><c> say</c><00:45:22.079><c> that</c><00:45:22.319><c> trans</c><00:45:22.640><c> women</c><00:45:22.880><c> are</c><00:45:23.119><c> men.</c><00:45:23.599><c> Trans</c>

00:45:23.910 --> 00:45:23.920 align:start position:0%
they say that trans women are men. Trans
 

00:45:23.920 --> 00:45:25.829 align:start position:0%
they say that trans women are men. Trans
women<00:45:24.160><c> who</c><00:45:24.400><c> either</c><00:45:24.720><c> have</c><00:45:24.880><c> had</c><00:45:25.119><c> bottom</c><00:45:25.520><c> surgery</c>

00:45:25.829 --> 00:45:25.839 align:start position:0%
women who either have had bottom surgery
 

00:45:25.839 --> 00:45:27.910 align:start position:0%
women who either have had bottom surgery
or<00:45:26.079><c> they've</c><00:45:26.319><c> been</c><00:45:26.480><c> on</c><00:45:26.640><c> HRT</c><00:45:27.200><c> for</c><00:45:27.359><c> so</c><00:45:27.520><c> long</c><00:45:27.680><c> they</c>

00:45:27.910 --> 00:45:27.920 align:start position:0%
or they've been on HRT for so long they
 

00:45:27.920 --> 00:45:29.510 align:start position:0%
or they've been on HRT for so long they
no<00:45:28.000><c> longer</c><00:45:28.240><c> produce</c><00:45:28.480><c> sperm</c><00:45:28.880><c> are</c><00:45:29.119><c> no</c><00:45:29.280><c> longer</c>

00:45:29.510 --> 00:45:29.520 align:start position:0%
no longer produce sperm are no longer
 

00:45:29.520 --> 00:45:31.430 align:start position:0%
no longer produce sperm are no longer
male.<00:45:29.920><c> They're</c><00:45:30.160><c> neuter.</c><00:45:30.640><c> They</c><00:45:30.880><c> don't</c><00:45:31.040><c> fit</c><00:45:31.280><c> the</c>

00:45:31.430 --> 00:45:31.440 align:start position:0%
male. They're neuter. They don't fit the
 

00:45:31.440 --> 00:45:33.510 align:start position:0%
male. They're neuter. They don't fit the
label<00:45:31.680><c> of</c><00:45:31.920><c> man,</c><00:45:32.240><c> adult</c><00:45:32.640><c> human</c><00:45:32.960><c> male,</c><00:45:33.359><c> because</c>

00:45:33.510 --> 00:45:33.520 align:start position:0%
label of man, adult human male, because
 

00:45:33.520 --> 00:45:35.750 align:start position:0%
label of man, adult human male, because
they<00:45:33.680><c> do</c><00:45:33.839><c> not</c><00:45:34.000><c> produce</c><00:45:34.480><c> small</c><00:45:34.800><c> gametes.</c><00:45:35.520><c> It's</c>

00:45:35.750 --> 00:45:35.760 align:start position:0%
they do not produce small gametes. It's
 

00:45:35.760 --> 00:45:37.030 align:start position:0%
they do not produce small gametes. It's
the<00:45:35.920><c> same</c><00:45:36.079><c> reason</c><00:45:36.240><c> as</c><00:45:36.480><c> why</c><00:45:36.640><c> they're</c><00:45:36.800><c> not</c><00:45:36.880><c> a</c>

00:45:37.030 --> 00:45:37.040 align:start position:0%
the same reason as why they're not a
 

00:45:37.040 --> 00:45:38.870 align:start position:0%
the same reason as why they're not a
female.<00:45:37.359><c> If</c><00:45:37.520><c> a</c><00:45:37.680><c> right-winger</c><00:45:38.160><c> like</c><00:45:38.319><c> Sargon</c>

00:45:38.870 --> 00:45:38.880 align:start position:0%
female. If a right-winger like Sargon
 

00:45:38.880 --> 00:45:41.030 align:start position:0%
female. If a right-winger like Sargon
can<00:45:39.119><c> recognize</c><00:45:39.520><c> that</c><00:45:39.920><c> despite</c><00:45:40.319><c> the</c><00:45:40.640><c> obvious</c>

00:45:41.030 --> 00:45:41.040 align:start position:0%
can recognize that despite the obvious
 

00:45:41.040 --> 00:45:42.630 align:start position:0%
can recognize that despite the obvious
similarities<00:45:41.599><c> between</c><00:45:41.839><c> a</c><00:45:42.000><c> trans</c><00:45:42.160><c> woman</c><00:45:42.319><c> and</c><00:45:42.480><c> a</c>

00:45:42.630 --> 00:45:42.640 align:start position:0%
similarities between a trans woman and a
 

00:45:42.640 --> 00:45:44.230 align:start position:0%
similarities between a trans woman and a
woman,<00:45:42.880><c> they</c><00:45:43.040><c> are</c><00:45:43.200><c> not</c><00:45:43.359><c> the</c><00:45:43.520><c> same</c><00:45:43.599><c> thing.</c><00:45:44.079><c> Then</c>

00:45:44.230 --> 00:45:44.240 align:start position:0%
woman, they are not the same thing. Then
 

00:45:44.240 --> 00:45:46.309 align:start position:0%
woman, they are not the same thing. Then
he<00:45:44.480><c> should</c><00:45:44.720><c> also</c><00:45:45.040><c> be</c><00:45:45.119><c> able</c><00:45:45.359><c> to</c><00:45:45.440><c> recognize</c><00:45:45.920><c> that</c>

00:45:46.309 --> 00:45:46.319 align:start position:0%
he should also be able to recognize that
 

00:45:46.319 --> 00:45:48.150 align:start position:0%
he should also be able to recognize that
despite<00:45:46.800><c> the</c><00:45:47.040><c> way</c><00:45:47.359><c> less</c><00:45:47.760><c> obvious</c>

00:45:48.150 --> 00:45:48.160 align:start position:0%
despite the way less obvious
 

00:45:48.160 --> 00:45:49.910 align:start position:0%
despite the way less obvious
similarities<00:45:48.880><c> between</c><00:45:49.119><c> a</c><00:45:49.280><c> trans</c><00:45:49.440><c> woman</c><00:45:49.599><c> and</c><00:45:49.760><c> a</c>

00:45:49.910 --> 00:45:49.920 align:start position:0%
similarities between a trans woman and a
 

00:45:49.920 --> 00:45:51.910 align:start position:0%
similarities between a trans woman and a
man,<00:45:50.240><c> they</c><00:45:50.480><c> are</c><00:45:50.640><c> also</c><00:45:50.960><c> not</c><00:45:51.200><c> the</c><00:45:51.359><c> same</c><00:45:51.520><c> thing.</c>

00:45:51.910 --> 00:45:51.920 align:start position:0%
man, they are also not the same thing.
 

00:45:51.920 --> 00:45:54.390 align:start position:0%
man, they are also not the same thing.
But<00:45:52.079><c> Sargon</c><00:45:52.720><c> can't</c><00:45:53.040><c> do</c><00:45:53.200><c> this</c><00:45:53.599><c> because</c><00:45:53.839><c> he</c><00:45:54.160><c> is</c>

00:45:54.390 --> 00:45:54.400 align:start position:0%
But Sargon can't do this because he is
 

00:45:54.400 --> 00:45:56.390 align:start position:0%
But Sargon can't do this because he is
just<00:45:54.640><c> as</c><00:45:54.880><c> ideologically</c><00:45:55.520><c> captured</c><00:45:55.760><c> as</c><00:45:55.920><c> Nara</c>

00:45:56.390 --> 00:45:56.400 align:start position:0%
just as ideologically captured as Nara
 

00:45:56.400 --> 00:45:58.069 align:start position:0%
just as ideologically captured as Nara
is<00:45:56.560><c> in</c><00:45:56.800><c> the</c><00:45:56.960><c> other</c><00:45:57.119><c> direction.</c><00:45:57.599><c> This</c><00:45:57.839><c> is</c><00:45:57.920><c> why</c>

00:45:58.069 --> 00:45:58.079 align:start position:0%
is in the other direction. This is why
 

00:45:58.079 --> 00:45:59.829 align:start position:0%
is in the other direction. This is why
he<00:45:58.240><c> has</c><00:45:58.400><c> to</c><00:45:58.560><c> characterize</c><00:45:58.960><c> my</c><00:45:59.280><c> position</c><00:45:59.599><c> in</c>

00:45:59.829 --> 00:45:59.839 align:start position:0%
he has to characterize my position in
 

00:45:59.839 --> 00:46:02.230 align:start position:0%
he has to characterize my position in
this<00:46:00.000><c> way.</c><00:46:00.400><c> But</c><00:46:00.640><c> notice</c><00:46:01.040><c> how</c><00:46:01.440><c> they're</c><00:46:01.920><c> trying</c>

00:46:02.230 --> 00:46:02.240 align:start position:0%
this way. But notice how they're trying
 

00:46:02.240 --> 00:46:04.550 align:start position:0%
this way. But notice how they're trying
to<00:46:02.480><c> capture</c><00:46:02.960><c> a</c><00:46:03.200><c> biologically</c><00:46:03.839><c> essentialist</c>

00:46:04.550 --> 00:46:04.560 align:start position:0%
to capture a biologically essentialist
 

00:46:04.560 --> 00:46:08.470 align:start position:0%
to capture a biologically essentialist
argument<00:46:04.960><c> here.</c><00:46:05.839><c> And</c><00:46:06.160><c> Dev</c><00:46:07.599><c> doesn't</c><00:46:08.000><c> seem</c><00:46:08.319><c> to</c>

00:46:08.470 --> 00:46:08.480 align:start position:0%
argument here. And Dev doesn't seem to
 

00:46:08.480 --> 00:46:10.470 align:start position:0%
argument here. And Dev doesn't seem to
realize<00:46:08.880><c> that</c>

00:46:10.470 --> 00:46:10.480 align:start position:0%
realize that
 

00:46:10.480 --> 00:46:13.510 align:start position:0%
realize that
his<00:46:11.040><c> idealist</c><00:46:11.760><c> position</c><00:46:12.720><c> of</c><00:46:13.040><c> we're</c><00:46:13.359><c> just</c>

00:46:13.510 --> 00:46:13.520 align:start position:0%
his idealist position of we're just
 

00:46:13.520 --> 00:46:15.589 align:start position:0%
his idealist position of we're just
going<00:46:13.680><c> to</c><00:46:13.760><c> let</c><00:46:13.920><c> them</c><00:46:14.079><c> pretend</c><00:46:15.200><c> out</c><00:46:15.359><c> of</c>

00:46:15.589 --> 00:46:15.599 align:start position:0%
going to let them pretend out of
 

00:46:15.599 --> 00:46:17.190 align:start position:0%
going to let them pretend out of
politeness<00:46:16.160><c> sake.</c><00:46:16.480><c> I</c><00:46:16.640><c> mean,</c><00:46:16.720><c> that's</c><00:46:16.880><c> not</c><00:46:16.960><c> even</c>

00:46:17.190 --> 00:46:17.200 align:start position:0%
politeness sake. I mean, that's not even
 

00:46:17.200 --> 00:46:19.190 align:start position:0%
politeness sake. I mean, that's not even
idealist.<00:46:17.760><c> He</c><00:46:17.920><c> would</c><00:46:18.240><c> like</c><00:46:18.480><c> I</c><00:46:18.640><c> guess</c><00:46:18.800><c> he</c><00:46:18.960><c> would</c>

00:46:19.190 --> 00:46:19.200 align:start position:0%
idealist. He would like I guess he would
 

00:46:19.200 --> 00:46:21.829 align:start position:0%
idealist. He would like I guess he would
concede<00:46:19.839><c> like</c><00:46:20.319><c> the</c>

00:46:21.829 --> 00:46:21.839 align:start position:0%
concede like the
 

00:46:21.839 --> 00:46:24.710 align:start position:0%
concede like the
everything<00:46:22.400><c> but</c><00:46:23.200><c> the</c><00:46:23.440><c> bi</c><00:46:24.000><c> biologically</c>

00:46:24.710 --> 00:46:24.720 align:start position:0%
everything but the bi biologically
 

00:46:24.720 --> 00:46:27.430 align:start position:0%
everything but the bi biologically
essentialist<00:46:25.200><c> aspect</c><00:46:25.440><c> of</c><00:46:25.599><c> the</c><00:46:25.760><c> argument</c>

00:46:27.430 --> 00:46:27.440 align:start position:0%
essentialist aspect of the argument
 

00:46:27.440 --> 00:46:30.069 align:start position:0%
essentialist aspect of the argument
and<00:46:27.680><c> then</c><00:46:27.839><c> for</c><00:46:28.079><c> that</c><00:46:28.319><c> just</c><00:46:28.560><c> say</c><00:46:28.800><c> as</c><00:46:29.040><c> he</c><00:46:29.280><c> says</c>

00:46:30.069 --> 00:46:30.079 align:start position:0%
and then for that just say as he says
 

00:46:30.079 --> 00:46:31.670 align:start position:0%
and then for that just say as he says
we're<00:46:30.319><c> just</c><00:46:30.480><c> going</c><00:46:30.560><c> to</c><00:46:30.640><c> believe</c><00:46:30.880><c> a</c><00:46:31.040><c> polite</c><00:46:31.359><c> lie</c>

00:46:31.670 --> 00:46:31.680 align:start position:0%
we're just going to believe a polite lie
 

00:46:31.680 --> 00:46:34.950 align:start position:0%
we're just going to believe a polite lie
about<00:46:31.920><c> this</c><00:46:32.800><c> but</c><00:46:33.520><c> the</c><00:46:33.839><c> people</c><00:46:34.079><c> that</c><00:46:34.400><c> he's</c>

00:46:34.950 --> 00:46:34.960 align:start position:0%
about this but the people that he's
 

00:46:34.960 --> 00:46:36.790 align:start position:0%
about this but the people that he's
trying<00:46:35.280><c> to</c><00:46:35.520><c> protect</c><00:46:36.000><c> don't</c><00:46:36.240><c> agree</c><00:46:36.480><c> with</c><00:46:36.640><c> him</c>

00:46:36.790 --> 00:46:36.800 align:start position:0%
trying to protect don't agree with him
 

00:46:36.800 --> 00:46:39.670 align:start position:0%
trying to protect don't agree with him
at<00:46:37.040><c> all.</c><00:46:37.839><c> No,</c><00:46:38.079><c> no,</c><00:46:38.560><c> they</c><00:46:38.880><c> don't</c><00:46:39.040><c> want</c><00:46:39.280><c> to</c><00:46:39.440><c> be</c>

00:46:39.670 --> 00:46:39.680 align:start position:0%
at all. No, no, they don't want to be
 

00:46:39.680 --> 00:46:42.150 align:start position:0%
at all. No, no, they don't want to be
liars.<00:46:40.800><c> And</c><00:46:41.040><c> this</c><00:46:41.200><c> is</c><00:46:41.359><c> one</c><00:46:41.520><c> of</c><00:46:41.599><c> the</c><00:46:41.839><c> things</c>

00:46:42.150 --> 00:46:42.160 align:start position:0%
liars. And this is one of the things
 

00:46:42.160 --> 00:46:45.030 align:start position:0%
liars. And this is one of the things
that<00:46:42.400><c> the</c><00:46:42.560><c> far-left</c><00:46:43.119><c> has</c><00:46:44.000><c> over</c><00:46:44.400><c> the</c><00:46:44.720><c> center</c>

00:46:45.030 --> 00:46:45.040 align:start position:0%
that the far-left has over the center
 

00:46:45.040 --> 00:46:46.630 align:start position:0%
that the far-left has over the center
left,<00:46:45.359><c> the</c><00:46:45.599><c> sort</c><00:46:45.760><c> of</c><00:46:45.839><c> liberals,</c><00:46:46.480><c> the</c>

00:46:46.630 --> 00:46:46.640 align:start position:0%
left, the sort of liberals, the
 

00:46:46.640 --> 00:46:48.790 align:start position:0%
left, the sort of liberals, the
communists,<00:46:47.119><c> the</c><00:46:47.599><c> radical</c><00:46:48.000><c> lunatics</c><00:46:48.560><c> have</c>

00:46:48.790 --> 00:46:48.800 align:start position:0%
communists, the radical lunatics have
 

00:46:48.800 --> 00:46:51.750 align:start position:0%
communists, the radical lunatics have
over<00:46:48.960><c> the</c><00:46:49.119><c> libtards,</c><00:46:50.560><c> which</c><00:46:50.800><c> is</c><00:46:51.200><c> well,</c>

00:46:51.750 --> 00:46:51.760 align:start position:0%
over the libtards, which is well,
 

00:46:51.760 --> 00:46:55.349 align:start position:0%
over the libtards, which is well,
they're<00:46:52.079><c> being</c><00:46:52.400><c> honest,</c><00:46:53.280><c> right?</c><00:46:54.079><c> The</c><00:46:54.319><c> liberal</c>

00:46:55.349 --> 00:46:55.359 align:start position:0%
they're being honest, right? The liberal
 

00:46:55.359 --> 00:46:59.670 align:start position:0%
they're being honest, right? The liberal
Dev's<00:46:55.839><c> own</c><00:46:56.079><c> position</c><00:46:57.359><c> contains</c><00:46:57.839><c> a</c><00:46:58.079><c> lie.</c><00:46:59.200><c> Dev's</c>

00:46:59.670 --> 00:46:59.680 align:start position:0%
Dev's own position contains a lie. Dev's
 

00:46:59.680 --> 00:47:03.270 align:start position:0%
Dev's own position contains a lie. Dev's
own<00:46:59.920><c> position</c><00:47:00.319><c> itself</c><00:47:01.520><c> is</c><00:47:01.839><c> a</c><00:47:02.160><c> lie</c><00:47:02.640><c> and</c><00:47:02.880><c> he</c>

00:47:03.270 --> 00:47:03.280 align:start position:0%
own position itself is a lie and he
 

00:47:03.280 --> 00:47:06.069 align:start position:0%
own position itself is a lie and he
advertises<00:47:04.000><c> it</c><00:47:04.240><c> as</c><00:47:04.400><c> a</c><00:47:04.640><c> lie.</c><00:47:05.200><c> No,</c><00:47:05.440><c> no,</c><00:47:05.599><c> no,</c><00:47:05.760><c> no.</c>

00:47:06.069 --> 00:47:06.079 align:start position:0%
advertises it as a lie. No, no, no, no.
 

00:47:06.079 --> 00:47:08.950 align:start position:0%
advertises it as a lie. No, no, no, no.
When<00:47:06.240><c> they</c><00:47:06.400><c> say</c><00:47:07.040><c> trans</c><00:47:07.359><c> women</c><00:47:07.599><c> are</c><00:47:07.760><c> women,</c><00:47:08.800><c> uh,</c>

00:47:08.950 --> 00:47:08.960 align:start position:0%
When they say trans women are women, uh,
 

00:47:08.960 --> 00:47:11.270 align:start position:0%
When they say trans women are women, uh,
trans<00:47:09.520><c> Yeah.</c><00:47:09.680><c> Yeah.</c><00:47:09.839><c> trans</c><00:47:10.160><c> men,</c><00:47:10.720><c> trans</c><00:47:11.040><c> women</c>

00:47:11.270 --> 00:47:11.280 align:start position:0%
trans Yeah. Yeah. trans men, trans women
 

00:47:11.280 --> 00:47:15.190 align:start position:0%
trans Yeah. Yeah. trans men, trans women
or<00:47:11.440><c> women.</c><00:47:12.079><c> Um</c><00:47:12.720><c> they're</c><00:47:13.040><c> not</c><00:47:13.280><c> saying</c><00:47:14.640><c> this</c><00:47:14.880><c> is</c>

00:47:15.190 --> 00:47:15.200 align:start position:0%
or women. Um they're not saying this is
 

00:47:15.200 --> 00:47:17.430 align:start position:0%
or women. Um they're not saying this is
really<00:47:15.599><c> true.</c><00:47:16.160><c> What</c><00:47:16.400><c> they're</c><00:47:16.640><c> doing</c><00:47:16.800><c> is</c><00:47:17.119><c> we're</c>

00:47:17.430 --> 00:47:17.440 align:start position:0%
really true. What they're doing is we're
 

00:47:17.440 --> 00:47:19.990 align:start position:0%
really true. What they're doing is we're
constructing<00:47:18.000><c> a</c><00:47:18.319><c> social</c><00:47:18.720><c> lie</c><00:47:19.440><c> that</c><00:47:19.680><c> we're</c><00:47:19.839><c> all</c>

00:47:19.990 --> 00:47:20.000 align:start position:0%
constructing a social lie that we're all
 

00:47:20.000 --> 00:47:21.670 align:start position:0%
constructing a social lie that we're all
going<00:47:20.079><c> to</c><00:47:20.319><c> adhere</c><00:47:20.720><c> to</c><00:47:20.880><c> because</c><00:47:21.119><c> it</c><00:47:21.359><c> protects</c>

00:47:21.670 --> 00:47:21.680 align:start position:0%
going to adhere to because it protects
 

00:47:21.680 --> 00:47:23.430 align:start position:0%
going to adhere to because it protects
someone's<00:47:22.079><c> feelings.</c><00:47:22.800><c> And</c><00:47:22.960><c> so</c><00:47:23.119><c> we're</c><00:47:23.280><c> all</c>

00:47:23.430 --> 00:47:23.440 align:start position:0%
someone's feelings. And so we're all
 

00:47:23.440 --> 00:47:25.589 align:start position:0%
someone's feelings. And so we're all
going<00:47:23.520><c> to</c><00:47:23.599><c> live</c><00:47:23.839><c> in</c><00:47:24.079><c> a</c><00:47:24.319><c> lie,</c><00:47:24.880><c> says</c><00:47:25.280><c> the</c>

00:47:25.589 --> 00:47:25.599 align:start position:0%
going to live in a lie, says the
 

00:47:25.599 --> 00:47:28.710 align:start position:0%
going to live in a lie, says the
liberal.<00:47:26.480><c> And</c><00:47:26.720><c> he</c><00:47:26.960><c> wonders</c><00:47:27.359><c> why</c><00:47:28.079><c> these</c><00:47:28.400><c> people</c>

00:47:28.710 --> 00:47:28.720 align:start position:0%
liberal. And he wonders why these people
 

00:47:28.720 --> 00:47:30.950 align:start position:0%
liberal. And he wonders why these people
are<00:47:28.960><c> just</c><00:47:29.119><c> like,</c><00:47:29.520><c> "No."</c><00:47:30.240><c> And</c><00:47:30.400><c> the</c><00:47:30.640><c> only</c>

00:47:30.950 --> 00:47:30.960 align:start position:0%
are just like, "No." And the only
 

00:47:30.960 --> 00:47:32.550 align:start position:0%
are just like, "No." And the only
recourse<00:47:31.359><c> that</c><00:47:31.520><c> Dev</c><00:47:31.760><c> has</c><00:47:31.920><c> is</c><00:47:32.160><c> say,</c><00:47:32.240><c> "Well,</c>

00:47:32.550 --> 00:47:32.560 align:start position:0%
recourse that Dev has is say, "Well,
 

00:47:32.560 --> 00:47:34.069 align:start position:0%
recourse that Dev has is say, "Well,
you're<00:47:32.720><c> not</c><00:47:32.800><c> being</c><00:47:33.040><c> reasonable."</c><00:47:33.760><c> It's</c><00:47:33.920><c> like,</c>

00:47:34.069 --> 00:47:34.079 align:start position:0%
you're not being reasonable." It's like,
 

00:47:34.079 --> 00:47:35.829 align:start position:0%
you're not being reasonable." It's like,
"Dev,<00:47:34.480><c> I</c><00:47:34.720><c> don't</c><00:47:34.880><c> know</c><00:47:34.960><c> that</c><00:47:35.119><c> it's</c><00:47:35.440><c> reasonable</c>

00:47:35.829 --> 00:47:35.839 align:start position:0%
"Dev, I don't know that it's reasonable
 

00:47:35.839 --> 00:47:38.790 align:start position:0%
"Dev, I don't know that it's reasonable
to<00:47:36.079><c> construct</c><00:47:36.640><c> a</c><00:47:36.960><c> widescale</c><00:47:37.680><c> social</c><00:47:38.079><c> lie."</c>

00:47:38.790 --> 00:47:38.800 align:start position:0%
to construct a widescale social lie."
 

00:47:38.800 --> 00:47:42.150 align:start position:0%
to construct a widescale social lie."
and<00:47:39.040><c> then</c><00:47:39.280><c> ex</c><00:47:39.520><c> insist</c><00:47:40.079><c> everyone</c><00:47:40.720><c> agree</c><00:47:41.119><c> to</c><00:47:41.280><c> it</c>

00:47:42.150 --> 00:47:42.160 align:start position:0%
and then ex insist everyone agree to it
 

00:47:42.160 --> 00:47:43.430 align:start position:0%
and then ex insist everyone agree to it
even<00:47:42.400><c> though</c><00:47:42.560><c> everyone</c><00:47:42.960><c> knows</c><00:47:43.200><c> it's</c><00:47:43.359><c> a</c>

00:47:43.430 --> 00:47:43.440 align:start position:0%
even though everyone knows it's a
 

00:47:43.440 --> 00:47:45.270 align:start position:0%
even though everyone knows it's a
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;]<00:47:43.760><c> lie.</c><00:47:44.480><c> I'm</c><00:47:44.720><c> not</c><00:47:44.800><c> sure</c><00:47:44.960><c> that's</c>

00:47:45.270 --> 00:47:45.280 align:start position:0%
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;] lie. I'm not sure that's
 

00:47:45.280 --> 00:47:47.190 align:start position:0%
[&nbsp;__&nbsp;] lie. I'm not sure that's
actually<00:47:45.520><c> reasonable</c><00:47:46.000><c> at</c><00:47:46.319><c> all.</c><00:47:47.040><c> And</c>

00:47:47.190 --> 00:47:47.200 align:start position:0%
actually reasonable at all. And
 

00:47:47.200 --> 00:47:49.510 align:start position:0%
actually reasonable at all. And
actually,<00:47:47.520><c> it</c><00:47:47.680><c> seems</c><00:47:48.000><c> very</c><00:47:48.319><c> unreasonable</c>

00:47:49.510 --> 00:47:49.520 align:start position:0%
actually, it seems very unreasonable
 

00:47:49.520 --> 00:47:51.750 align:start position:0%
actually, it seems very unreasonable
when<00:47:49.839><c> you</c><00:47:50.480><c> actually</c><00:47:51.040><c> lay</c><00:47:51.119><c> out</c><00:47:51.280><c> what</c><00:47:51.520><c> that</c>

00:47:51.750 --> 00:47:51.760 align:start position:0%
when you actually lay out what that
 

00:47:51.760 --> 00:47:55.990 align:start position:0%
when you actually lay out what that
you're<00:47:52.000><c> doing</c><00:47:52.160><c> here.</c><00:47:53.359><c> And</c><00:47:54.079><c> honestly,</c><00:47:54.880><c> I</c><00:47:55.119><c> mean,</c>

00:47:55.990 --> 00:47:56.000 align:start position:0%
you're doing here. And honestly, I mean,
 

00:47:56.000 --> 00:47:57.990 align:start position:0%
you're doing here. And honestly, I mean,
these<00:47:56.319><c> are</c><00:47:56.480><c> not</c><00:47:56.720><c> good</c><00:47:56.960><c> arguments,</c><00:47:57.760><c> but</c><00:47:58.000><c> at</c>

00:47:57.990 --> 00:47:58.000 align:start position:0%
these are not good arguments, but at
 

00:47:58.000 --> 00:47:59.910 align:start position:0%
these are not good arguments, but at
least<00:47:58.319><c> these</c><00:47:58.640><c> people</c><00:47:58.960><c> genuinely</c><00:47:59.599><c> believe</c>

00:47:59.910 --> 00:47:59.920 align:start position:0%
least these people genuinely believe
 

00:47:59.920 --> 00:48:02.790 align:start position:0%
least these people genuinely believe
these<00:48:00.319><c> arguments,</c><00:48:01.760><c> and</c><00:48:01.920><c> so</c><00:48:02.160><c> at</c><00:48:02.160><c> least</c><00:48:02.480><c> there's</c>

00:48:02.790 --> 00:48:02.800 align:start position:0%
these arguments, and so at least there's
 

00:48:02.800 --> 00:48:05.030 align:start position:0%
these arguments, and so at least there's
some<00:48:02.960><c> kind</c><00:48:03.119><c> of</c><00:48:03.280><c> sincerity</c><00:48:03.920><c> behind</c><00:48:04.319><c> them.</c><00:48:04.720><c> No,</c>

00:48:05.030 --> 00:48:05.040 align:start position:0%
some kind of sincerity behind them. No,
 

00:48:05.040 --> 00:48:07.190 align:start position:0%
some kind of sincerity behind them. No,
Sargon,<00:48:05.599><c> it's</c><00:48:05.839><c> not</c><00:48:06.079><c> a</c><00:48:06.240><c> lie.</c><00:48:06.560><c> It's</c><00:48:06.800><c> recognizing</c>

00:48:07.190 --> 00:48:07.200 align:start position:0%
Sargon, it's not a lie. It's recognizing
 

00:48:07.200 --> 00:48:08.550 align:start position:0%
Sargon, it's not a lie. It's recognizing
that<00:48:07.359><c> gender</c><00:48:07.599><c> dysphoria</c><00:48:08.079><c> is</c><00:48:08.240><c> a</c><00:48:08.400><c> real</c>

00:48:08.550 --> 00:48:08.560 align:start position:0%
that gender dysphoria is a real
 

00:48:08.560 --> 00:48:10.710 align:start position:0%
that gender dysphoria is a real
phenomenon.<00:48:09.359><c> That</c><00:48:09.599><c> phenomenon</c><00:48:10.240><c> combined</c>

00:48:10.710 --> 00:48:10.720 align:start position:0%
phenomenon. That phenomenon combined
 

00:48:10.720 --> 00:48:12.630 align:start position:0%
phenomenon. That phenomenon combined
with<00:48:10.880><c> the</c><00:48:11.119><c> work</c><00:48:11.359><c> that</c><00:48:11.599><c> trans</c><00:48:11.920><c> women</c><00:48:12.240><c> put</c><00:48:12.400><c> into</c>

00:48:12.630 --> 00:48:12.640 align:start position:0%
with the work that trans women put into
 

00:48:12.640 --> 00:48:14.870 align:start position:0%
with the work that trans women put into
alleviating<00:48:13.200><c> it</c><00:48:13.520><c> does</c><00:48:13.760><c> not</c><00:48:14.000><c> mean</c><00:48:14.319><c> that</c><00:48:14.560><c> trans</c>

00:48:14.870 --> 00:48:14.880 align:start position:0%
alleviating it does not mean that trans
 

00:48:14.880 --> 00:48:17.030 align:start position:0%
alleviating it does not mean that trans
women<00:48:15.200><c> are</c><00:48:15.440><c> the</c><00:48:15.599><c> same</c><00:48:15.839><c> thing</c><00:48:16.000><c> as</c><00:48:16.319><c> cis</c><00:48:16.640><c> women.</c>

00:48:17.030 --> 00:48:17.040 align:start position:0%
women are the same thing as cis women.
 

00:48:17.040 --> 00:48:18.390 align:start position:0%
women are the same thing as cis women.
But<00:48:17.200><c> it</c><00:48:17.359><c> also</c><00:48:17.680><c> does</c><00:48:17.839><c> not</c><00:48:18.000><c> mean</c><00:48:18.160><c> that</c><00:48:18.240><c> they're</c>

00:48:18.390 --> 00:48:18.400 align:start position:0%
But it also does not mean that they're
 

00:48:18.400 --> 00:48:20.230 align:start position:0%
But it also does not mean that they're
the<00:48:18.560><c> same</c><00:48:18.640><c> thing</c><00:48:18.720><c> as</c><00:48:18.880><c> cis</c><00:48:19.200><c> men</c><00:48:19.520><c> either.</c><00:48:20.000><c> I'm</c>

00:48:20.230 --> 00:48:20.240 align:start position:0%
the same thing as cis men either. I'm
 

00:48:20.240 --> 00:48:22.470 align:start position:0%
the same thing as cis men either. I'm
not<00:48:20.400><c> lying</c><00:48:20.720><c> here.</c><00:48:21.119><c> I'm</c><00:48:21.359><c> recognizing</c><00:48:21.839><c> nuance.</c>

00:48:22.470 --> 00:48:22.480 align:start position:0%
not lying here. I'm recognizing nuance.
 

00:48:22.480 --> 00:48:24.069 align:start position:0%
not lying here. I'm recognizing nuance.
And<00:48:22.640><c> your</c><00:48:22.960><c> entire</c><00:48:23.359><c> goal</c><00:48:23.599><c> in</c><00:48:23.839><c> this</c>

00:48:24.069 --> 00:48:24.079 align:start position:0%
And your entire goal in this
 

00:48:24.079 --> 00:48:25.829 align:start position:0%
And your entire goal in this
conversation<00:48:24.720><c> seems</c><00:48:25.040><c> to</c><00:48:25.119><c> be</c><00:48:25.280><c> the</c><00:48:25.440><c> same</c><00:48:25.599><c> as</c>

00:48:25.829 --> 00:48:25.839 align:start position:0%
conversation seems to be the same as
 

00:48:25.839 --> 00:48:28.309 align:start position:0%
conversation seems to be the same as
Niara<00:48:26.319><c> and</c><00:48:26.559><c> her</c><00:48:26.880><c> ilk.</c><00:48:27.200><c> To</c><00:48:27.359><c> collapse</c><00:48:27.839><c> nuance</c>

00:48:28.309 --> 00:48:28.319 align:start position:0%
Niara and her ilk. To collapse nuance
 

00:48:28.319 --> 00:48:30.549 align:start position:0%
Niara and her ilk. To collapse nuance
and<00:48:28.559><c> render</c><00:48:28.960><c> true</c><00:48:29.280><c> understanding</c><00:48:29.920><c> impossible</c>

00:48:30.549 --> 00:48:30.559 align:start position:0%
and render true understanding impossible
 

00:48:30.559 --> 00:48:32.470 align:start position:0%
and render true understanding impossible
in<00:48:30.800><c> a</c><00:48:30.960><c> way</c><00:48:31.040><c> that</c><00:48:31.200><c> aligns</c><00:48:31.599><c> with</c><00:48:31.839><c> your</c><00:48:32.160><c> larger</c>

00:48:32.470 --> 00:48:32.480 align:start position:0%
in a way that aligns with your larger
 

00:48:32.480 --> 00:48:34.710 align:start position:0%
in a way that aligns with your larger
political<00:48:32.880><c> agenda.</c><00:48:33.440><c> But</c><00:48:33.599><c> I</c><00:48:33.839><c> refuse</c><00:48:34.160><c> to</c><00:48:34.400><c> follow</c>

00:48:34.710 --> 00:48:34.720 align:start position:0%
political agenda. But I refuse to follow
 

00:48:34.720 --> 00:48:37.030 align:start position:0%
political agenda. But I refuse to follow
either<00:48:34.960><c> of</c><00:48:35.119><c> you</c><00:48:35.359><c> down</c><00:48:35.520><c> those</c><00:48:35.760><c> paths.</c><00:48:36.480><c> This,</c><00:48:36.800><c> I</c>

00:48:37.030 --> 00:48:37.040 align:start position:0%
either of you down those paths. This, I
 

00:48:37.040 --> 00:48:38.950 align:start position:0%
either of you down those paths. This, I
think,<00:48:37.200><c> is</c><00:48:37.359><c> just</c><00:48:37.599><c> the</c><00:48:37.760><c> the</c><00:48:38.079><c> point</c><00:48:38.240><c> of</c><00:48:38.559><c> what</c><00:48:38.800><c> I'm</c>

00:48:38.950 --> 00:48:38.960 align:start position:0%
think, is just the the point of what I'm
 

00:48:38.960 --> 00:48:40.950 align:start position:0%
think, is just the the point of what I'm
trying<00:48:39.119><c> to</c><00:48:39.200><c> drive</c><00:48:39.359><c> at</c><00:48:39.599><c> here</c><00:48:39.680><c> is</c><00:48:40.079><c> essentially</c>

00:48:40.950 --> 00:48:40.960 align:start position:0%
trying to drive at here is essentially
 

00:48:40.960 --> 00:48:43.750 align:start position:0%
trying to drive at here is essentially
Dev<00:48:41.359><c> doesn't</c><00:48:41.760><c> have</c><00:48:42.079><c> any</c><00:48:42.480><c> space</c><00:48:42.960><c> to</c><00:48:43.280><c> be</c><00:48:43.359><c> able</c><00:48:43.599><c> to</c>

00:48:43.750 --> 00:48:43.760 align:start position:0%
Dev doesn't have any space to be able to
 

00:48:43.760 --> 00:48:46.230 align:start position:0%
Dev doesn't have any space to be able to
make<00:48:44.079><c> the</c><00:48:44.319><c> sort</c><00:48:44.480><c> of</c><00:48:44.720><c> 2015</c>

00:48:46.230 --> 00:48:46.240 align:start position:0%
make the sort of 2015
 

00:48:46.240 --> 00:48:48.790 align:start position:0%
make the sort of 2015
liberal<00:48:46.720><c> arguments</c><00:48:47.280><c> against</c><00:48:48.400><c> radical</c>

00:48:48.790 --> 00:48:48.800 align:start position:0%
liberal arguments against radical
 

00:48:48.800 --> 00:48:50.870 align:start position:0%
liberal arguments against radical
wokeness,<00:48:49.520><c> right?</c><00:48:50.000><c> That</c><00:48:50.160><c> that</c><00:48:50.480><c> space</c><00:48:50.720><c> has</c>

00:48:50.870 --> 00:48:50.880 align:start position:0%
wokeness, right? That that space has
 

00:48:50.880 --> 00:48:54.230 align:start position:0%
wokeness, right? That that space has
collapsed.<00:48:51.760><c> The</c><00:48:52.079><c> people</c><00:48:52.240><c> on</c><00:48:53.040><c> neither</c><00:48:53.440><c> side</c>

00:48:54.230 --> 00:48:54.240 align:start position:0%
collapsed. The people on neither side
 

00:48:54.240 --> 00:48:57.109 align:start position:0%
collapsed. The people on neither side
agree<00:48:54.640><c> with</c><00:48:54.800><c> him</c><00:48:55.760><c> and</c><00:48:56.079><c> so</c><00:48:56.400><c> he</c><00:48:56.640><c> can't</c><00:48:56.880><c> create</c>

00:48:57.109 --> 00:48:57.119 align:start position:0%
agree with him and so he can't create
 

00:48:57.119 --> 00:48:59.270 align:start position:0%
agree with him and so he can't create
the<00:48:57.359><c> compromise</c><00:48:57.920><c> he's</c><00:48:58.160><c> trying</c><00:48:58.319><c> to</c><00:48:58.559><c> create.</c>

00:48:59.270 --> 00:48:59.280 align:start position:0%
the compromise he's trying to create.
 

00:48:59.280 --> 00:49:01.349 align:start position:0%
the compromise he's trying to create.
So,<00:48:59.440><c> yes,</c><00:48:59.680><c> no,</c><00:48:59.839><c> we</c><00:49:00.079><c> will</c><00:49:00.559><c> pay</c><00:49:00.800><c> heed</c><00:49:01.200><c> to</c>

00:49:01.349 --> 00:49:01.359 align:start position:0%
So, yes, no, we will pay heed to
 

00:49:01.359 --> 00:49:03.990 align:start position:0%
So, yes, no, we will pay heed to
reality,<00:49:02.160><c> but</c><00:49:02.559><c> we</c><00:49:02.720><c> believe</c><00:49:03.200><c> what</c><00:49:03.440><c> we</c><00:49:03.680><c> think</c><00:49:03.839><c> of</c>

00:49:03.990 --> 00:49:04.000 align:start position:0%
reality, but we believe what we think of
 

00:49:04.000 --> 00:49:06.790 align:start position:0%
reality, but we believe what we think of
it<00:49:04.160><c> as</c><00:49:04.400><c> their</c><00:49:04.640><c> lies.</c><00:49:05.760><c> And</c><00:49:06.160><c> the</c><00:49:06.400><c> people</c><00:49:06.559><c> on</c><00:49:06.720><c> the</c>

00:49:06.790 --> 00:49:06.800 align:start position:0%
it as their lies. And the people on the
 

00:49:06.800 --> 00:49:07.829 align:start position:0%
it as their lies. And the people on the
right<00:49:06.880><c> are</c><00:49:07.040><c> saying,</c><00:49:07.119><c> "Well,</c><00:49:07.440><c> no,</c><00:49:07.599><c> we're</c><00:49:07.760><c> not</c>

00:49:07.829 --> 00:49:07.839 align:start position:0%
right are saying, "Well, no, we're not
 

00:49:07.839 --> 00:49:08.950 align:start position:0%
right are saying, "Well, no, we're not
going<00:49:07.920><c> to</c><00:49:08.079><c> we're</c><00:49:08.240><c> not</c><00:49:08.400><c> going</c><00:49:08.400><c> to</c><00:49:08.480><c> pay</c><00:49:08.640><c> heed</c><00:49:08.880><c> to</c>

00:49:08.950 --> 00:49:08.960 align:start position:0%
going to we're not going to pay heed to
 

00:49:08.960 --> 00:49:10.790 align:start position:0%
going to we're not going to pay heed to
their<00:49:09.119><c> reality</c><00:49:09.440><c> cuz</c><00:49:09.599><c> it's</c><00:49:09.839><c> not</c><00:49:10.000><c> real."</c><00:49:10.640><c> And</c>

00:49:10.790 --> 00:49:10.800 align:start position:0%
their reality cuz it's not real." And
 

00:49:10.800 --> 00:49:11.990 align:start position:0%
their reality cuz it's not real." And
the<00:49:10.960><c> people</c><00:49:11.040><c> on</c><00:49:11.200><c> the</c><00:49:11.280><c> left</c><00:49:11.599><c> like,</c><00:49:11.680><c> "We</c><00:49:11.920><c> don't</c>

00:49:11.990 --> 00:49:12.000 align:start position:0%
the people on the left like, "We don't
 

00:49:12.000 --> 00:49:13.990 align:start position:0%
the people on the left like, "We don't
want<00:49:12.079><c> to</c><00:49:12.160><c> live</c><00:49:12.319><c> by</c><00:49:12.480><c> lies.</c><00:49:13.280><c> We</c><00:49:13.520><c> genuinely</c>

00:49:13.990 --> 00:49:14.000 align:start position:0%
want to live by lies. We genuinely
 

00:49:14.000 --> 00:49:15.670 align:start position:0%
want to live by lies. We genuinely
believe<00:49:14.240><c> this.</c><00:49:14.640><c> Whether</c><00:49:15.040><c> you</c><00:49:15.280><c> think</c><00:49:15.440><c> it's</c>

00:49:15.670 --> 00:49:15.680 align:start position:0%
believe this. Whether you think it's
 

00:49:15.680 --> 00:49:17.589 align:start position:0%
believe this. Whether you think it's
true<00:49:15.839><c> or</c><00:49:16.000><c> not,</c><00:49:16.480><c> in</c><00:49:16.640><c> fact,</c><00:49:16.800><c> the</c><00:49:17.040><c> fact</c><00:49:17.280><c> that</c><00:49:17.359><c> you</c>

00:49:17.589 --> 00:49:17.599 align:start position:0%
true or not, in fact, the fact that you
 

00:49:17.599 --> 00:49:19.349 align:start position:0%
true or not, in fact, the fact that you
don't<00:49:17.760><c> think</c><00:49:17.920><c> it's</c><00:49:18.160><c> true</c><00:49:18.720><c> makes</c><00:49:18.960><c> you</c><00:49:19.200><c> the</c>

00:49:19.349 --> 00:49:19.359 align:start position:0%
don't think it's true makes you the
 

00:49:19.359 --> 00:49:21.190 align:start position:0%
don't think it's true makes you the
reactionary<00:49:20.000><c> evil</c><00:49:20.319><c> like</c><00:49:20.480><c> you,</c><00:49:20.720><c> the</c><00:49:20.960><c> people</c><00:49:21.040><c> on</c>

00:49:21.190 --> 00:49:21.200 align:start position:0%
reactionary evil like you, the people on
 

00:49:21.200 --> 00:49:23.030 align:start position:0%
reactionary evil like you, the people on
the<00:49:21.359><c> right."</c><00:49:21.599><c> If</c><00:49:21.839><c> it</c><00:49:22.000><c> is</c><00:49:22.160><c> truly</c><00:49:22.480><c> the</c><00:49:22.640><c> case</c><00:49:22.800><c> that</c>

00:49:23.030 --> 00:49:23.040 align:start position:0%
the right." If it is truly the case that
 

00:49:23.040 --> 00:49:25.349 align:start position:0%
the right." If it is truly the case that
I<00:49:23.200><c> am</c><00:49:23.280><c> the</c><00:49:23.520><c> final</c><00:49:23.920><c> 2015</c><00:49:24.559><c> liberal</c><00:49:24.880><c> and</c><00:49:25.119><c> there's</c>

00:49:25.349 --> 00:49:25.359 align:start position:0%
I am the final 2015 liberal and there's
 

00:49:25.359 --> 00:49:27.430 align:start position:0%
I am the final 2015 liberal and there's
nobody<00:49:25.760><c> left</c><00:49:26.000><c> who</c><00:49:26.319><c> actually</c><00:49:26.640><c> agrees</c><00:49:26.960><c> with</c><00:49:27.119><c> me,</c>

00:49:27.430 --> 00:49:27.440 align:start position:0%
nobody left who actually agrees with me,
 

00:49:27.440 --> 00:49:29.270 align:start position:0%
nobody left who actually agrees with me,
then<00:49:27.599><c> that's</c><00:49:27.839><c> fine.</c><00:49:28.240><c> I've</c><00:49:28.559><c> made</c><00:49:28.720><c> my</c><00:49:28.960><c> peace</c>

00:49:29.270 --> 00:49:29.280 align:start position:0%
then that's fine. I've made my peace
 

00:49:29.280 --> 00:49:31.510 align:start position:0%
then that's fine. I've made my peace
with<00:49:29.440><c> that</c><00:49:29.680><c> long</c><00:49:29.920><c> ago.</c><00:49:30.480><c> My</c><00:49:30.720><c> many</c><00:49:31.040><c> debates</c><00:49:31.359><c> with</c>

00:49:31.510 --> 00:49:31.520 align:start position:0%
with that long ago. My many debates with
 

00:49:31.520 --> 00:49:33.190 align:start position:0%
with that long ago. My many debates with
you<00:49:31.680><c> and</c><00:49:31.839><c> the</c><00:49:32.000><c> others</c><00:49:32.240><c> over</c><00:49:32.400><c> the</c><00:49:32.559><c> years</c><00:49:32.800><c> about,</c>

00:49:33.190 --> 00:49:33.200 align:start position:0%
you and the others over the years about,
 

00:49:33.200 --> 00:49:34.790 align:start position:0%
you and the others over the years about,
for<00:49:33.280><c> example,</c><00:49:33.760><c> the</c><00:49:33.920><c> objective</c><00:49:34.400><c> truth</c><00:49:34.640><c> of</c>

00:49:34.790 --> 00:49:34.800 align:start position:0%
for example, the objective truth of
 

00:49:34.800 --> 00:49:36.549 align:start position:0%
for example, the objective truth of
Trump's<00:49:35.119><c> corruption</c><00:49:35.680><c> have</c><00:49:35.920><c> already</c><00:49:36.160><c> helped</c>

00:49:36.549 --> 00:49:36.559 align:start position:0%
Trump's corruption have already helped
 

00:49:36.559 --> 00:49:38.630 align:start position:0%
Trump's corruption have already helped
steal<00:49:36.880><c> me</c><00:49:37.040><c> to</c><00:49:37.280><c> the</c><00:49:37.440><c> outcome</c><00:49:37.760><c> of</c><00:49:38.240><c> being</c>

00:49:38.630 --> 00:49:38.640 align:start position:0%
steal me to the outcome of being
 

00:49:38.640 --> 00:49:41.030 align:start position:0%
steal me to the outcome of being
surrounded<00:49:39.119><c> by</c><00:49:39.440><c> giant</c><00:49:39.839><c> hordes</c><00:49:40.319><c> of</c><00:49:40.480><c> people</c><00:49:40.720><c> who</c>

00:49:41.030 --> 00:49:41.040 align:start position:0%
surrounded by giant hordes of people who
 

00:49:41.040 --> 00:49:43.030 align:start position:0%
surrounded by giant hordes of people who
do<00:49:41.200><c> not</c><00:49:41.359><c> live</c><00:49:41.520><c> in</c><00:49:41.760><c> reality</c><00:49:42.240><c> and</c><00:49:42.480><c> do</c><00:49:42.640><c> not</c><00:49:42.880><c> see</c>

00:49:43.030 --> 00:49:43.040 align:start position:0%
do not live in reality and do not see
 

00:49:43.040 --> 00:49:44.950 align:start position:0%
do not live in reality and do not see
beyond<00:49:43.359><c> what</c><00:49:43.599><c> is</c><00:49:43.760><c> good</c><00:49:43.839><c> for</c><00:49:44.000><c> their</c><00:49:44.240><c> side.</c><00:49:44.720><c> I'm</c>

00:49:44.950 --> 00:49:44.960 align:start position:0%
beyond what is good for their side. I'm
 

00:49:44.960 --> 00:49:46.870 align:start position:0%
beyond what is good for their side. I'm
not<00:49:45.119><c> lying.</c><00:49:45.680><c> Rather,</c><00:49:46.079><c> I'm</c><00:49:46.319><c> just</c><00:49:46.480><c> willing</c><00:49:46.720><c> to</c>

00:49:46.870 --> 00:49:46.880 align:start position:0%
not lying. Rather, I'm just willing to
 

00:49:46.880 --> 00:49:48.790 align:start position:0%
not lying. Rather, I'm just willing to
observe<00:49:47.119><c> the</c><00:49:47.359><c> bits</c><00:49:47.520><c> of</c><00:49:47.680><c> reality</c><00:49:48.079><c> that</c><00:49:48.400><c> you</c><00:49:48.640><c> are</c>

00:49:48.790 --> 00:49:48.800 align:start position:0%
observe the bits of reality that you are
 

00:49:48.800 --> 00:49:50.710 align:start position:0%
observe the bits of reality that you are
willfully<00:49:49.359><c> blind</c><00:49:49.680><c> towards.</c><00:49:50.319><c> And</c><00:49:50.480><c> I'm</c><00:49:50.640><c> going</c>

00:49:50.710 --> 00:49:50.720 align:start position:0%
willfully blind towards. And I'm going
 

00:49:50.720 --> 00:49:52.710 align:start position:0%
willfully blind towards. And I'm going
to<00:49:50.880><c> remain</c><00:49:51.200><c> here</c><00:49:51.440><c> unmoved</c><00:49:51.920><c> by</c><00:49:52.079><c> either</c><00:49:52.319><c> of</c><00:49:52.480><c> you</c>

00:49:52.710 --> 00:49:52.720 align:start position:0%
to remain here unmoved by either of you
 

00:49:52.720 --> 00:49:55.030 align:start position:0%
to remain here unmoved by either of you
because<00:49:52.960><c> that</c><00:49:53.359><c> 2015</c><00:49:54.000><c> liberal</c><00:49:54.319><c> position</c><00:49:54.800><c> when</c>

00:49:55.030 --> 00:49:55.040 align:start position:0%
because that 2015 liberal position when
 

00:49:55.040 --> 00:49:57.030 align:start position:0%
because that 2015 liberal position when
fully<00:49:55.359><c> articulated</c><00:49:56.079><c> is</c><00:49:56.319><c> actually</c><00:49:56.640><c> the</c><00:49:56.880><c> one</c>

00:49:57.030 --> 00:49:57.040 align:start position:0%
fully articulated is actually the one
 

00:49:57.040 --> 00:49:58.950 align:start position:0%
fully articulated is actually the one
that<00:49:57.280><c> is</c><00:49:57.440><c> most</c><00:49:57.760><c> in</c><00:49:58.000><c> line</c><00:49:58.160><c> with</c><00:49:58.400><c> observable</c>

00:49:58.950 --> 00:49:58.960 align:start position:0%
that is most in line with observable
 

00:49:58.960 --> 00:50:00.710 align:start position:0%
that is most in line with observable
reality.<00:49:59.520><c> And</c><00:49:59.680><c> additionally,</c><00:50:00.240><c> it</c><00:50:00.480><c> doesn't</c>

00:50:00.710 --> 00:50:00.720 align:start position:0%
reality. And additionally, it doesn't
 

00:50:00.720 --> 00:50:02.150 align:start position:0%
reality. And additionally, it doesn't
actually<00:50:00.960><c> matter</c><00:50:01.280><c> if</c><00:50:01.520><c> the</c><00:50:01.680><c> people</c><00:50:01.839><c> who</c><00:50:02.000><c> I'm</c>

00:50:02.150 --> 00:50:02.160 align:start position:0%
actually matter if the people who I'm
 

00:50:02.160 --> 00:50:04.470 align:start position:0%
actually matter if the people who I'm
defending<00:50:02.720><c> hate</c><00:50:02.960><c> me</c><00:50:03.119><c> for</c><00:50:03.359><c> my</c><00:50:03.520><c> defense</c><00:50:04.160><c> because</c>

00:50:04.470 --> 00:50:04.480 align:start position:0%
defending hate me for my defense because
 

00:50:04.480 --> 00:50:06.390 align:start position:0%
defending hate me for my defense because
I'm<00:50:04.720><c> not</c><00:50:04.960><c> really</c><00:50:05.200><c> doing</c><00:50:05.359><c> it</c><00:50:05.520><c> for</c><00:50:05.760><c> them.</c><00:50:06.079><c> I'm</c>

00:50:06.390 --> 00:50:06.400 align:start position:0%
I'm not really doing it for them. I'm
 

00:50:06.400 --> 00:50:08.150 align:start position:0%
I'm not really doing it for them. I'm
doing<00:50:06.559><c> it</c><00:50:06.720><c> because</c><00:50:06.960><c> it's</c><00:50:07.280><c> correct.</c><00:50:07.760><c> For</c><00:50:08.000><c> some</c>

00:50:08.150 --> 00:50:08.160 align:start position:0%
doing it because it's correct. For some
 

00:50:08.160 --> 00:50:09.670 align:start position:0%
doing it because it's correct. For some
reason,<00:50:08.400><c> Dev</c><00:50:08.720><c> has</c><00:50:08.880><c> decided</c><00:50:09.119><c> he's</c><00:50:09.440><c> going</c><00:50:09.520><c> to</c>

00:50:09.670 --> 00:50:09.680 align:start position:0%
reason, Dev has decided he's going to
 

00:50:09.680 --> 00:50:12.069 align:start position:0%
reason, Dev has decided he's going to
fix<00:50:09.920><c> himself</c><00:50:10.240><c> in</c><00:50:10.480><c> this</c><00:50:10.640><c> place.</c><00:50:11.200><c> I</c><00:50:11.440><c> fix</c><00:50:11.680><c> myself</c>

00:50:12.069 --> 00:50:12.079 align:start position:0%
fix himself in this place. I fix myself
 

00:50:12.079 --> 00:50:14.470 align:start position:0%
fix himself in this place. I fix myself
in<00:50:12.319><c> this</c><00:50:12.559><c> place</c><00:50:12.960><c> because</c><00:50:13.200><c> what</c><00:50:13.520><c> this</c><00:50:13.839><c> place</c><00:50:14.160><c> is</c>

00:50:14.470 --> 00:50:14.480 align:start position:0%
in this place because what this place is
 

00:50:14.480 --> 00:50:16.069 align:start position:0%
in this place because what this place is
is<00:50:14.720><c> the</c><00:50:14.960><c> real</c><00:50:15.119><c> world.</c><00:50:15.440><c> I</c><00:50:15.680><c> think</c><00:50:15.760><c> the</c><00:50:16.000><c> reason</c>

00:50:16.069 --> 00:50:16.079 align:start position:0%
is the real world. I think the reason
 

00:50:16.079 --> 00:50:17.510 align:start position:0%
is the real world. I think the reason
I've<00:50:16.319><c> come</c><00:50:16.480><c> to</c><00:50:16.640><c> appreciate</c><00:50:17.040><c> guys</c><00:50:17.280><c> like</c>

00:50:17.510 --> 00:50:17.520 align:start position:0%
I've come to appreciate guys like
 

00:50:17.520 --> 00:50:19.190 align:start position:0%
I've come to appreciate guys like
Richard<00:50:17.760><c> Hania,</c><00:50:18.319><c> for</c><00:50:18.319><c> example,</c><00:50:18.720><c> is</c><00:50:18.960><c> because</c>

00:50:19.190 --> 00:50:19.200 align:start position:0%
Richard Hania, for example, is because
 

00:50:19.200 --> 00:50:20.950 align:start position:0%
Richard Hania, for example, is because
while<00:50:19.599><c> he</c><00:50:19.839><c> fully</c><00:50:20.240><c> understands</c><00:50:20.720><c> and</c>

00:50:20.950 --> 00:50:20.960 align:start position:0%
while he fully understands and
 

00:50:20.960 --> 00:50:22.950 align:start position:0%
while he fully understands and
articulates<00:50:21.520><c> the</c><00:50:21.760><c> fault</c><00:50:22.000><c> of</c><00:50:22.160><c> liberalism,</c><00:50:22.720><c> he</c>

00:50:22.950 --> 00:50:22.960 align:start position:0%
articulates the fault of liberalism, he
 

00:50:22.960 --> 00:50:24.710 align:start position:0%
articulates the fault of liberalism, he
recognizes<00:50:23.359><c> that</c><00:50:23.599><c> nonetheless</c><00:50:24.160><c> it</c><00:50:24.400><c> is</c><00:50:24.559><c> still</c>

00:50:24.710 --> 00:50:24.720 align:start position:0%
recognizes that nonetheless it is still
 

00:50:24.720 --> 00:50:26.549 align:start position:0%
recognizes that nonetheless it is still
the<00:50:24.960><c> most</c><00:50:25.200><c> in</c><00:50:25.440><c> line</c><00:50:25.680><c> with</c><00:50:25.839><c> the</c><00:50:26.000><c> real</c><00:50:26.240><c> world</c>

00:50:26.549 --> 00:50:26.559 align:start position:0%
the most in line with the real world
 

00:50:26.559 --> 00:50:28.309 align:start position:0%
the most in line with the real world
when<00:50:26.880><c> compared</c><00:50:27.200><c> to</c><00:50:27.359><c> any</c><00:50:27.680><c> other</c><00:50:27.920><c> political</c>

00:50:28.309 --> 00:50:28.319 align:start position:0%
when compared to any other political
 

00:50:28.319 --> 00:50:30.150 align:start position:0%
when compared to any other political
position.<00:50:28.880><c> However,</c><00:50:29.280><c> I</c><00:50:29.440><c> will</c><00:50:29.599><c> once</c><00:50:29.839><c> again</c>

00:50:30.150 --> 00:50:30.160 align:start position:0%
position. However, I will once again
 

00:50:30.160 --> 00:50:32.630 align:start position:0%
position. However, I will once again
give<00:50:30.400><c> the</c><00:50:30.559><c> devil</c><00:50:30.800><c> his</c><00:50:31.040><c> due.</c><00:50:31.440><c> Sargon</c><00:50:32.079><c> did</c><00:50:32.400><c> in</c>

00:50:32.630 --> 00:50:32.640 align:start position:0%
give the devil his due. Sargon did in
 

00:50:32.640 --> 00:50:34.630 align:start position:0%
give the devil his due. Sargon did in
fact<00:50:32.960><c> accurately</c><00:50:33.520><c> identify</c><00:50:33.839><c> the</c><00:50:34.160><c> reason</c><00:50:34.400><c> as</c>

00:50:34.630 --> 00:50:34.640 align:start position:0%
fact accurately identify the reason as
 

00:50:34.640 --> 00:50:36.870 align:start position:0%
fact accurately identify the reason as
to<00:50:34.800><c> why</c><00:50:35.040><c> I</c><00:50:35.280><c> find</c><00:50:35.440><c> myself</c><00:50:35.920><c> opposed</c><00:50:36.240><c> to</c><00:50:36.400><c> both</c><00:50:36.640><c> him</c>

00:50:36.870 --> 00:50:36.880 align:start position:0%
to why I find myself opposed to both him
 

00:50:36.880 --> 00:50:39.030 align:start position:0%
to why I find myself opposed to both him
and<00:50:37.119><c> Nara.</c><00:50:37.760><c> These</c><00:50:38.079><c> two</c><00:50:38.240><c> factions</c><00:50:38.720><c> view</c><00:50:38.880><c> the</c>

00:50:39.030 --> 00:50:39.040 align:start position:0%
and Nara. These two factions view the
 

00:50:39.040 --> 00:50:40.710 align:start position:0%
and Nara. These two factions view the
problem<00:50:39.280><c> the</c><00:50:39.520><c> same</c><00:50:39.680><c> way.</c><00:50:40.000><c> They</c><00:50:40.160><c> just</c><00:50:40.319><c> disagree</c>

00:50:40.710 --> 00:50:40.720 align:start position:0%
problem the same way. They just disagree
 

00:50:40.720 --> 00:50:42.549 align:start position:0%
problem the same way. They just disagree
on<00:50:40.960><c> outcome.</c><00:50:41.520><c> I'm</c><00:50:41.839><c> different</c><00:50:42.000><c> from</c><00:50:42.240><c> both</c><00:50:42.400><c> of</c>

00:50:42.549 --> 00:50:42.559 align:start position:0%
on outcome. I'm different from both of
 

00:50:42.559 --> 00:50:44.390 align:start position:0%
on outcome. I'm different from both of
them<00:50:42.720><c> as</c><00:50:42.960><c> are</c><00:50:43.119><c> many</c><00:50:43.280><c> other</c><00:50:43.520><c> libs</c><00:50:43.920><c> because</c><00:50:44.160><c> we</c>

00:50:44.390 --> 00:50:44.400 align:start position:0%
them as are many other libs because we
 

00:50:44.400 --> 00:50:45.589 align:start position:0%
them as are many other libs because we
do<00:50:44.640><c> actually</c><00:50:44.960><c> view</c><00:50:45.200><c> the</c><00:50:45.359><c> problem</c>

00:50:45.589 --> 00:50:45.599 align:start position:0%
do actually view the problem
 

00:50:45.599 --> 00:50:46.870 align:start position:0%
do actually view the problem
differently.<00:50:46.079><c> Here's</c><00:50:46.319><c> a</c><00:50:46.400><c> great</c><00:50:46.559><c> example</c><00:50:46.720><c> of</c>

00:50:46.870 --> 00:50:46.880 align:start position:0%
differently. Here's a great example of
 

00:50:46.880 --> 00:50:48.309 align:start position:0%
differently. Here's a great example of
what<00:50:46.960><c> I</c><00:50:47.119><c> mean</c><00:50:47.280><c> from</c><00:50:47.440><c> someone</c><00:50:47.599><c> in</c><00:50:47.760><c> the</c><00:50:47.839><c> Nara</c>

00:50:48.309 --> 00:50:48.319 align:start position:0%
what I mean from someone in the Nara
 

00:50:48.319 --> 00:50:50.950 align:start position:0%
what I mean from someone in the Nara
crowd.<00:50:48.800><c> The</c><00:50:48.960><c> gender</c><00:50:49.520><c> not</c><00:50:49.920><c> sex</c><00:50:50.160><c> rhetoric</c><00:50:50.720><c> shows</c>

00:50:50.950 --> 00:50:50.960 align:start position:0%
crowd. The gender not sex rhetoric shows
 

00:50:50.960 --> 00:50:53.430 align:start position:0%
crowd. The gender not sex rhetoric shows
us<00:50:51.200><c> once</c><00:50:51.520><c> again</c><00:50:51.839><c> how</c><00:50:52.079><c> it</c><00:50:52.319><c> damaged</c><00:50:52.720><c> our</c><00:50:52.960><c> allies</c>

00:50:53.430 --> 00:50:53.440 align:start position:0%
us once again how it damaged our allies
 

00:50:53.440 --> 00:50:55.030 align:start position:0%
us once again how it damaged our allies
perception<00:50:53.839><c> and</c><00:50:54.000><c> advocacy</c><00:50:54.400><c> of</c><00:50:54.559><c> us.</c>

00:50:55.030 --> 00:50:55.040 align:start position:0%
perception and advocacy of us.
 

00:50:55.040 --> 00:50:56.710 align:start position:0%
perception and advocacy of us.
Literally,<00:50:55.440><c> you</c><00:50:55.680><c> are</c><00:50:55.839><c> not</c><00:50:56.000><c> that</c><00:50:56.319><c> far</c><00:50:56.480><c> from</c>

00:50:56.710 --> 00:50:56.720 align:start position:0%
Literally, you are not that far from
 

00:50:56.720 --> 00:50:58.630 align:start position:0%
Literally, you are not that far from
thinking<00:50:57.040><c> like</c><00:50:57.280><c> them</c><00:50:57.599><c> if</c><00:50:57.839><c> your</c><00:50:58.000><c> whole</c><00:50:58.240><c> defense</c>

00:50:58.630 --> 00:50:58.640 align:start position:0%
thinking like them if your whole defense
 

00:50:58.640 --> 00:51:00.230 align:start position:0%
thinking like them if your whole defense
is<00:50:58.800><c> just</c><00:50:59.040><c> leave</c><00:50:59.200><c> them</c><00:50:59.359><c> alone.</c><00:50:59.839><c> You</c><00:51:00.000><c> can</c><00:51:00.079><c> really</c>

00:51:00.230 --> 00:51:00.240 align:start position:0%
is just leave them alone. You can really
 

00:51:00.240 --> 00:51:01.349 align:start position:0%
is just leave them alone. You can really
only<00:51:00.480><c> say</c><00:51:00.640><c> this</c><00:51:00.880><c> slop</c><00:51:01.119><c> if</c><00:51:01.280><c> you're</c>

00:51:01.349 --> 00:51:01.359 align:start position:0%
only say this slop if you're
 

00:51:01.359 --> 00:51:03.430 align:start position:0%
only say this slop if you're
ideologically<00:51:01.920><c> captured</c><00:51:02.400><c> because</c><00:51:02.800><c> this</c><00:51:03.119><c> is</c>

00:51:03.430 --> 00:51:03.440 align:start position:0%
ideologically captured because this is
 

00:51:03.440 --> 00:51:05.430 align:start position:0%
ideologically captured because this is
actually<00:51:03.760><c> the</c><00:51:04.000><c> proper</c><00:51:04.480><c> individual</c><00:51:04.960><c> liberty's</c>

00:51:05.430 --> 00:51:05.440 align:start position:0%
actually the proper individual liberty's
 

00:51:05.440 --> 00:51:07.589 align:start position:0%
actually the proper individual liberty's
defense.<00:51:06.000><c> Sargon's</c><00:51:06.640><c> correct</c><00:51:06.880><c> in</c><00:51:07.119><c> that</c><00:51:07.359><c> this</c>

00:51:07.589 --> 00:51:07.599 align:start position:0%
defense. Sargon's correct in that this
 

00:51:07.599 --> 00:51:09.349 align:start position:0%
defense. Sargon's correct in that this
person's<00:51:08.079><c> logic</c><00:51:08.480><c> is</c><00:51:08.800><c> biological</c>

00:51:09.349 --> 00:51:09.359 align:start position:0%
person's logic is biological
 

00:51:09.359 --> 00:51:11.109 align:start position:0%
person's logic is biological
essentialism<00:51:10.079><c> from</c><00:51:10.240><c> the</c><00:51:10.400><c> other</c><00:51:10.559><c> side.</c><00:51:10.960><c> But</c>

00:51:11.109 --> 00:51:11.119 align:start position:0%
essentialism from the other side. But
 

00:51:11.119 --> 00:51:13.270 align:start position:0%
essentialism from the other side. But
that<00:51:11.359><c> logic</c><00:51:11.839><c> is</c><00:51:12.160><c> incomplete</c><00:51:12.800><c> for</c><00:51:12.960><c> the</c><00:51:13.119><c> reasons</c>

00:51:13.270 --> 00:51:13.280 align:start position:0%
that logic is incomplete for the reasons
 

00:51:13.280 --> 00:51:14.790 align:start position:0%
that logic is incomplete for the reasons
we've<00:51:13.520><c> already</c><00:51:13.760><c> discussed.</c><00:51:14.319><c> They're</c><00:51:14.559><c> both</c>

00:51:14.790 --> 00:51:14.800 align:start position:0%
we've already discussed. They're both
 

00:51:14.800 --> 00:51:16.309 align:start position:0%
we've already discussed. They're both
missing<00:51:15.119><c> parts</c><00:51:15.359><c> of</c><00:51:15.440><c> the</c><00:51:15.680><c> story.</c><00:51:16.000><c> The</c><00:51:16.160><c> whole</c>

00:51:16.309 --> 00:51:16.319 align:start position:0%
missing parts of the story. The whole
 

00:51:16.319 --> 00:51:17.589 align:start position:0%
missing parts of the story. The whole
thing<00:51:16.480><c> boils</c><00:51:16.800><c> down</c><00:51:16.880><c> to</c><00:51:17.040><c> something</c><00:51:17.200><c> like</c><00:51:17.359><c> this.</c>

00:51:17.589 --> 00:51:17.599 align:start position:0%
thing boils down to something like this.
 

00:51:17.599 --> 00:51:20.309 align:start position:0%
thing boils down to something like this.
For<00:51:17.839><c> Nara,</c><00:51:18.480><c> supporting</c><00:51:18.880><c> protrans</c><00:51:19.599><c> policies,</c>

00:51:20.309 --> 00:51:20.319 align:start position:0%
For Nara, supporting protrans policies,
 

00:51:20.319 --> 00:51:22.630 align:start position:0%
For Nara, supporting protrans policies,
like<00:51:20.720><c> say</c><00:51:21.280><c> enshrining</c><00:51:21.839><c> a</c><00:51:22.000><c> legal</c><00:51:22.319><c> right</c><00:51:22.480><c> for</c>

00:51:22.630 --> 00:51:22.640 align:start position:0%
like say enshrining a legal right for
 

00:51:22.640 --> 00:51:24.710 align:start position:0%
like say enshrining a legal right for
individuals<00:51:23.040><c> to</c><00:51:23.200><c> transition</c><00:51:23.760><c> is</c><00:51:23.920><c> not</c><00:51:24.160><c> enough.</c>

00:51:24.710 --> 00:51:24.720 align:start position:0%
individuals to transition is not enough.
 

00:51:24.720 --> 00:51:27.190 align:start position:0%
individuals to transition is not enough.
To<00:51:24.960><c> her,</c><00:51:25.359><c> doing</c><00:51:25.599><c> that</c><00:51:25.839><c> is</c><00:51:26.160><c> still</c><00:51:26.400><c> transphobic</c>

00:51:27.190 --> 00:51:27.200 align:start position:0%
To her, doing that is still transphobic
 

00:51:27.200 --> 00:51:29.270 align:start position:0%
To her, doing that is still transphobic
if<00:51:27.440><c> you</c><00:51:27.599><c> don't</c><00:51:27.760><c> accept</c><00:51:28.079><c> the</c><00:51:28.319><c> underlying</c><00:51:28.880><c> logic</c>

00:51:29.270 --> 00:51:29.280 align:start position:0%
if you don't accept the underlying logic
 

00:51:29.280 --> 00:51:31.589 align:start position:0%
if you don't accept the underlying logic
of<00:51:29.520><c> trans</c><00:51:29.839><c> women</c><00:51:30.079><c> being</c><00:51:30.319><c> women.</c><00:51:30.800><c> as</c><00:51:31.040><c> in</c><00:51:31.359><c> trans</c>

00:51:31.589 --> 00:51:31.599 align:start position:0%
of trans women being women. as in trans
 

00:51:31.599 --> 00:51:33.030 align:start position:0%
of trans women being women. as in trans
women<00:51:31.920><c> being</c><00:51:32.240><c> identical</c><00:51:32.480><c> enough</c><00:51:32.640><c> to</c><00:51:32.880><c> sis</c>

00:51:33.030 --> 00:51:33.040 align:start position:0%
women being identical enough to sis
 

00:51:33.040 --> 00:51:35.109 align:start position:0%
women being identical enough to sis
women<00:51:33.280><c> to</c><00:51:33.520><c> place</c><00:51:33.680><c> them</c><00:51:33.920><c> in</c><00:51:34.079><c> the</c><00:51:34.319><c> same</c><00:51:34.480><c> category</c>

00:51:35.109 --> 00:51:35.119 align:start position:0%
women to place them in the same category
 

00:51:35.119 --> 00:51:37.510 align:start position:0%
women to place them in the same category
in<00:51:35.359><c> all</c><00:51:35.599><c> possible</c><00:51:36.160><c> languages</c><00:51:36.640><c> and</c><00:51:36.880><c> spaces</c><00:51:37.359><c> to</c>

00:51:37.510 --> 00:51:37.520 align:start position:0%
in all possible languages and spaces to
 

00:51:37.520 --> 00:51:39.030 align:start position:0%
in all possible languages and spaces to
the<00:51:37.680><c> point</c><00:51:37.760><c> that</c><00:51:38.000><c> you</c><00:51:38.160><c> genuinely</c><00:51:38.720><c> believe</c>

00:51:39.030 --> 00:51:39.040 align:start position:0%
the point that you genuinely believe
 

00:51:39.040 --> 00:51:41.270 align:start position:0%
the point that you genuinely believe
trans<00:51:39.280><c> women</c><00:51:39.599><c> are</c><00:51:39.839><c> female</c><00:51:40.319><c> in</c><00:51:40.480><c> all</c><00:51:40.640><c> respects.</c>

00:51:41.270 --> 00:51:41.280 align:start position:0%
trans women are female in all respects.
 

00:51:41.280 --> 00:51:43.109 align:start position:0%
trans women are female in all respects.
Nara<00:51:41.760><c> types</c><00:51:42.079><c> don't</c><00:51:42.240><c> simply</c><00:51:42.559><c> want</c><00:51:42.800><c> civil</c>

00:51:43.109 --> 00:51:43.119 align:start position:0%
Nara types don't simply want civil
 

00:51:43.119 --> 00:51:44.950 align:start position:0%
Nara types don't simply want civil
acceptance.<00:51:43.760><c> They</c><00:51:44.079><c> want</c><00:51:44.160><c> you</c><00:51:44.319><c> to</c><00:51:44.559><c> think</c><00:51:44.720><c> like</c>

00:51:44.950 --> 00:51:44.960 align:start position:0%
acceptance. They want you to think like
 

00:51:44.960 --> 00:51:46.950 align:start position:0%
acceptance. They want you to think like
they<00:51:45.200><c> do.</c><00:51:45.520><c> Any</c><00:51:45.760><c> contradictions</c><00:51:46.319><c> be</c><00:51:46.480><c> damned.</c>

00:51:46.950 --> 00:51:46.960 align:start position:0%
they do. Any contradictions be damned.
 

00:51:46.960 --> 00:51:48.549 align:start position:0%
they do. Any contradictions be damned.
Meanwhile,<00:51:47.359><c> for</c><00:51:47.520><c> Sargon,</c><00:51:48.079><c> the</c><00:51:48.240><c> liberal</c>

00:51:48.549 --> 00:51:48.559 align:start position:0%
Meanwhile, for Sargon, the liberal
 

00:51:48.559 --> 00:51:49.990 align:start position:0%
Meanwhile, for Sargon, the liberal
rejection<00:51:48.880><c> of</c><00:51:49.040><c> trans</c><00:51:49.280><c> women</c><00:51:49.520><c> as</c><00:51:49.760><c> being</c>

00:51:49.990 --> 00:51:50.000 align:start position:0%
rejection of trans women as being
 

00:51:50.000 --> 00:51:51.750 align:start position:0%
rejection of trans women as being
identical<00:51:50.319><c> to</c><00:51:50.400><c> siswoman</c><00:51:50.880><c> is</c><00:51:51.119><c> also</c><00:51:51.359><c> not</c><00:51:51.520><c> enough</c>

00:51:51.750 --> 00:51:51.760 align:start position:0%
identical to siswoman is also not enough
 

00:51:51.760 --> 00:51:53.829 align:start position:0%
identical to siswoman is also not enough
for<00:51:51.920><c> him.</c><00:51:52.160><c> That's</c><00:51:52.400><c> still</c><00:51:52.720><c> far-left</c><00:51:53.200><c> lunacy.</c>

00:51:53.829 --> 00:51:53.839 align:start position:0%
for him. That's still far-left lunacy.
 

00:51:53.839 --> 00:51:55.750 align:start position:0%
for him. That's still far-left lunacy.
Sargon<00:51:54.400><c> types</c><00:51:54.720><c> make</c><00:51:54.880><c> the</c><00:51:55.119><c> same</c><00:51:55.280><c> demands</c><00:51:55.520><c> as</c>

00:51:55.750 --> 00:51:55.760 align:start position:0%
Sargon types make the same demands as
 

00:51:55.760 --> 00:51:57.670 align:start position:0%
Sargon types make the same demands as
Niara<00:51:56.160><c> types</c><00:51:56.480><c> from</c><00:51:56.720><c> the</c><00:51:56.880><c> opposite</c><00:51:57.119><c> direction.</c>

00:51:57.670 --> 00:51:57.680 align:start position:0%
Niara types from the opposite direction.
 

00:51:57.680 --> 00:51:59.750 align:start position:0%
Niara types from the opposite direction.
people<00:51:57.920><c> in</c><00:51:58.079><c> his</c><00:51:58.319><c> camp</c><00:51:58.720><c> are</c><00:51:58.960><c> very</c><00:51:59.280><c> happy</c><00:51:59.520><c> to</c>

00:51:59.750 --> 00:51:59.760 align:start position:0%
people in his camp are very happy to
 

00:51:59.760 --> 00:52:01.670 align:start position:0%
people in his camp are very happy to
demand<00:52:00.079><c> that</c><00:52:00.319><c> you</c><00:52:00.559><c> say</c><00:52:00.720><c> the</c><00:52:00.960><c> magic</c><00:52:01.280><c> words.</c>

00:52:01.670 --> 00:52:01.680 align:start position:0%
demand that you say the magic words.
 

00:52:01.680 --> 00:52:03.910 align:start position:0%
demand that you say the magic words.
Trans<00:52:02.000><c> women</c><00:52:02.319><c> are</c><00:52:02.480><c> men.</c><00:52:03.040><c> That</c><00:52:03.200><c> is,</c><00:52:03.440><c> if</c><00:52:03.680><c> you</c><00:52:03.760><c> can</c>

00:52:03.910 --> 00:52:03.920 align:start position:0%
Trans women are men. That is, if you can
 

00:52:03.920 --> 00:52:05.270 align:start position:0%
Trans women are men. That is, if you can
ever<00:52:04.160><c> actually</c><00:52:04.400><c> have</c><00:52:04.559><c> a</c><00:52:04.720><c> long</c><00:52:04.960><c> enough</c>

00:52:05.270 --> 00:52:05.280 align:start position:0%
ever actually have a long enough
 

00:52:05.280 --> 00:52:07.030 align:start position:0%
ever actually have a long enough
coherent<00:52:05.920><c> dialogue</c><00:52:06.319><c> with</c><00:52:06.480><c> them</c><00:52:06.640><c> to</c><00:52:06.800><c> get</c><00:52:06.880><c> to</c>

00:52:07.030 --> 00:52:07.040 align:start position:0%
coherent dialogue with them to get to
 

00:52:07.040 --> 00:52:08.710 align:start position:0%
coherent dialogue with them to get to
that<00:52:07.200><c> point.</c><00:52:07.599><c> In</c><00:52:07.760><c> reality,</c><00:52:08.240><c> trans</c><00:52:08.480><c> women</c>

00:52:08.710 --> 00:52:08.720 align:start position:0%
that point. In reality, trans women
 

00:52:08.720 --> 00:52:10.549 align:start position:0%
that point. In reality, trans women
aren't<00:52:09.040><c> women</c><00:52:09.200><c> and</c><00:52:09.359><c> they're</c><00:52:09.520><c> also</c><00:52:09.760><c> not</c><00:52:09.920><c> men.</c><00:52:10.400><c> I</c>

00:52:10.549 --> 00:52:10.559 align:start position:0%
aren't women and they're also not men. I
 

00:52:10.559 --> 00:52:12.470 align:start position:0%
aren't women and they're also not men. I
don't<00:52:10.720><c> care</c><00:52:11.040><c> whose</c><00:52:11.440><c> political</c><00:52:11.760><c> activism</c><00:52:12.240><c> this</c>

00:52:12.470 --> 00:52:12.480 align:start position:0%
don't care whose political activism this
 

00:52:12.480 --> 00:52:14.470 align:start position:0%
don't care whose political activism this
hurts.<00:52:12.880><c> It's</c><00:52:13.200><c> true.</c><00:52:13.599><c> And</c><00:52:13.760><c> the</c><00:52:14.000><c> reason</c><00:52:14.160><c> it's</c>

00:52:14.470 --> 00:52:14.480 align:start position:0%
hurts. It's true. And the reason it's
 

00:52:14.480 --> 00:52:16.630 align:start position:0%
hurts. It's true. And the reason it's
true<00:52:14.720><c> is</c><00:52:14.960><c> because</c><00:52:15.200><c> the</c><00:52:15.520><c> observable</c><00:52:16.160><c> evidence</c>

00:52:16.630 --> 00:52:16.640 align:start position:0%
true is because the observable evidence
 

00:52:16.640 --> 00:52:18.549 align:start position:0%
true is because the observable evidence
about<00:52:16.960><c> trans</c><00:52:17.280><c> women</c><00:52:17.599><c> in</c><00:52:17.760><c> the</c><00:52:17.920><c> real</c><00:52:18.160><c> world</c>

00:52:18.549 --> 00:52:18.559 align:start position:0%
about trans women in the real world
 

00:52:18.559 --> 00:52:20.630 align:start position:0%
about trans women in the real world
points<00:52:18.880><c> towards</c><00:52:19.280><c> them</c><00:52:19.520><c> having</c><00:52:19.839><c> some</c><00:52:20.240><c> aspects</c>

00:52:20.630 --> 00:52:20.640 align:start position:0%
points towards them having some aspects
 

00:52:20.640 --> 00:52:22.950 align:start position:0%
points towards them having some aspects
of<00:52:20.880><c> femaleeness,</c><00:52:21.599><c> but</c><00:52:21.920><c> not</c><00:52:22.160><c> all</c><00:52:22.319><c> of</c><00:52:22.400><c> them.</c>

00:52:22.950 --> 00:52:22.960 align:start position:0%
of femaleeness, but not all of them.
 

00:52:22.960 --> 00:52:25.109 align:start position:0%
of femaleeness, but not all of them.
existing<00:52:23.440><c> in</c><00:52:23.680><c> that</c><00:52:24.000><c> space</c><00:52:24.400><c> between</c><00:52:24.800><c> two</c>

00:52:25.109 --> 00:52:25.119 align:start position:0%
existing in that space between two
 

00:52:25.119 --> 00:52:27.190 align:start position:0%
existing in that space between two
clusters<00:52:25.599><c> in</c><00:52:25.839><c> a</c><00:52:26.000><c> biodal</c><00:52:26.559><c> distribution</c>

00:52:27.190 --> 00:52:27.200 align:start position:0%
clusters in a biodal distribution
 

00:52:27.200 --> 00:52:28.790 align:start position:0%
clusters in a biodal distribution
inherently<00:52:27.839><c> means</c><00:52:28.160><c> that</c><00:52:28.319><c> you're</c><00:52:28.559><c> not</c>

00:52:28.790 --> 00:52:28.800 align:start position:0%
inherently means that you're not
 

00:52:28.800 --> 00:52:30.790 align:start position:0%
inherently means that you're not
actually<00:52:29.119><c> a</c><00:52:29.280><c> part</c><00:52:29.440><c> of</c><00:52:29.680><c> either</c><00:52:30.000><c> cluster.</c><00:52:30.640><c> And</c>

00:52:30.790 --> 00:52:30.800 align:start position:0%
actually a part of either cluster. And
 

00:52:30.800 --> 00:52:33.109 align:start position:0%
actually a part of either cluster. And
moving<00:52:31.200><c> from</c><00:52:31.520><c> cluster</c><00:52:32.000><c> A</c><00:52:32.240><c> into</c><00:52:32.480><c> the</c><00:52:32.720><c> center</c>

00:52:33.109 --> 00:52:33.119 align:start position:0%
moving from cluster A into the center
 

00:52:33.119 --> 00:52:34.710 align:start position:0%
moving from cluster A into the center
does<00:52:33.359><c> not</c><00:52:33.599><c> automatically</c><00:52:34.160><c> put</c><00:52:34.319><c> you</c><00:52:34.480><c> into</c>

00:52:34.710 --> 00:52:34.720 align:start position:0%
does not automatically put you into
 

00:52:34.720 --> 00:52:36.790 align:start position:0%
does not automatically put you into
cluster<00:52:35.119><c> B.</c><00:52:35.520><c> It</c><00:52:35.680><c> means</c><00:52:36.000><c> you're</c><00:52:36.240><c> in</c><00:52:36.400><c> the</c><00:52:36.559><c> center</c>

00:52:36.790 --> 00:52:36.800 align:start position:0%
cluster B. It means you're in the center
 

00:52:36.800 --> 00:52:38.870 align:start position:0%
cluster B. It means you're in the center
and<00:52:37.040><c> that's</c><00:52:37.200><c> that.</c><00:52:37.760><c> Anyway,</c><00:52:38.160><c> there</c><00:52:38.400><c> is</c><00:52:38.559><c> a</c><00:52:38.800><c> lot</c>

00:52:38.870 --> 00:52:38.880 align:start position:0%
and that's that. Anyway, there is a lot
 

00:52:38.880 --> 00:52:40.710 align:start position:0%
and that's that. Anyway, there is a lot
more<00:52:39.040><c> to</c><00:52:39.200><c> this</c><00:52:39.440><c> topic.</c><00:52:39.839><c> Maybe</c><00:52:40.079><c> I</c><00:52:40.319><c> will</c><00:52:40.480><c> do</c>

00:52:40.710 --> 00:52:40.720 align:start position:0%
more to this topic. Maybe I will do
 

00:52:40.720 --> 00:52:42.790 align:start position:0%
more to this topic. Maybe I will do
follow-up<00:52:41.200><c> videos</c><00:52:41.440><c> on</c><00:52:41.760><c> different</c><00:52:42.079><c> points</c><00:52:42.559><c> in</c>

00:52:42.790 --> 00:52:42.800 align:start position:0%
follow-up videos on different points in
 

00:52:42.800 --> 00:52:44.790 align:start position:0%
follow-up videos on different points in
my<00:52:42.960><c> multi-week</c><00:52:43.680><c> Twitter</c><00:52:44.000><c> argument</c><00:52:44.240><c> with</c><00:52:44.400><c> Nar</c>

00:52:44.790 --> 00:52:44.800 align:start position:0%
my multi-week Twitter argument with Nar
 

00:52:44.800 --> 00:52:46.710 align:start position:0%
my multi-week Twitter argument with Nar
that<00:52:44.880><c> I</c><00:52:44.960><c> didn't</c><00:52:45.119><c> cover</c><00:52:45.359><c> today.</c><00:52:45.760><c> But</c><00:52:45.920><c> Sargon</c><00:52:46.480><c> is</c>

00:52:46.710 --> 00:52:46.720 align:start position:0%
that I didn't cover today. But Sargon is
 

00:52:46.720 --> 00:52:48.470 align:start position:0%
that I didn't cover today. But Sargon is
ultimately<00:52:47.119><c> correct</c><00:52:47.440><c> when</c><00:52:47.680><c> he</c><00:52:47.920><c> says</c><00:52:48.079><c> that</c><00:52:48.240><c> the</c>

00:52:48.470 --> 00:52:48.480 align:start position:0%
ultimately correct when he says that the
 

00:52:48.480 --> 00:52:49.910 align:start position:0%
ultimately correct when he says that the
trans<00:52:48.800><c> activists</c><00:52:49.280><c> are</c><00:52:49.520><c> probably</c><00:52:49.680><c> going</c><00:52:49.839><c> to</c>

00:52:49.910 --> 00:52:49.920 align:start position:0%
trans activists are probably going to
 

00:52:49.920 --> 00:52:51.510 align:start position:0%
trans activists are probably going to
lose<00:52:50.160><c> this</c><00:52:50.400><c> fight,</c><00:52:50.800><c> at</c><00:52:50.800><c> least</c><00:52:51.040><c> in</c><00:52:51.200><c> the</c><00:52:51.359><c> short</c>

00:52:51.510 --> 00:52:51.520 align:start position:0%
lose this fight, at least in the short
 

00:52:51.520 --> 00:52:53.750 align:start position:0%
lose this fight, at least in the short
term.<00:52:52.079><c> Liberalism</c><00:52:52.720><c> is</c><00:52:52.880><c> revealed</c><00:52:53.200><c> to</c><00:52:53.359><c> be</c><00:52:53.520><c> a</c>

00:52:53.750 --> 00:52:53.760 align:start position:0%
term. Liberalism is revealed to be a
 

00:52:53.760 --> 00:52:56.309 align:start position:0%
term. Liberalism is revealed to be a
kind<00:52:53.920><c> of</c><00:52:54.079><c> social</c><00:52:54.480><c> technology</c><00:52:55.599><c> rather</c><00:52:56.000><c> than</c>

00:52:56.309 --> 00:52:56.319 align:start position:0%
kind of social technology rather than
 

00:52:56.319 --> 00:52:58.630 align:start position:0%
kind of social technology rather than
actually<00:52:56.800><c> anything</c><00:52:57.200><c> useful</c><00:52:57.760><c> about</c><00:52:58.160><c> passing</c>

00:52:58.630 --> 00:52:58.640 align:start position:0%
actually anything useful about passing
 

00:52:58.640 --> 00:53:01.349 align:start position:0%
actually anything useful about passing
the<00:52:58.960><c> world</c><00:52:59.280><c> itself.</c><00:53:00.640><c> It's</c><00:53:00.800><c> trying</c><00:53:01.040><c> to</c><00:53:01.200><c> bring</c>

00:53:01.349 --> 00:53:01.359 align:start position:0%
the world itself. It's trying to bring
 

00:53:01.359 --> 00:53:04.390 align:start position:0%
the world itself. It's trying to bring
into<00:53:01.760><c> existence</c><00:53:02.880><c> a</c><00:53:03.040><c> a</c><00:53:03.359><c> social</c><00:53:03.680><c> space</c><00:53:04.000><c> to</c><00:53:04.240><c> bring</c>

00:53:04.390 --> 00:53:04.400 align:start position:0%
into existence a a social space to bring
 

00:53:04.400 --> 00:53:05.829 align:start position:0%
into existence a a social space to bring
these<00:53:04.640><c> two</c><00:53:04.800><c> things</c><00:53:05.040><c> together</c><00:53:05.359><c> so</c><00:53:05.520><c> they</c><00:53:05.760><c> can</c>

00:53:05.829 --> 00:53:05.839 align:start position:0%
these two things together so they can
 

00:53:05.839 --> 00:53:07.990 align:start position:0%
these two things together so they can
both<00:53:06.079><c> exist</c><00:53:06.400><c> together.</c><00:53:07.440><c> But</c><00:53:07.599><c> no,</c><00:53:07.839><c> they're</c>

00:53:07.990 --> 00:53:08.000 align:start position:0%
both exist together. But no, they're
 

00:53:08.000 --> 00:53:10.150 align:start position:0%
both exist together. But no, they're
directly<00:53:08.400><c> contradictory.</c><00:53:09.599><c> And</c><00:53:09.920><c> the</c>

00:53:10.150 --> 00:53:10.160 align:start position:0%
directly contradictory. And the
 

00:53:10.160 --> 00:53:12.630 align:start position:0%
directly contradictory. And the
overwhelming<00:53:10.720><c> majority</c><00:53:11.119><c> of</c><00:53:11.359><c> people</c><00:53:12.160><c> who</c><00:53:12.400><c> do</c>

00:53:12.630 --> 00:53:12.640 align:start position:0%
overwhelming majority of people who do
 

00:53:12.640 --> 00:53:15.589 align:start position:0%
overwhelming majority of people who do
not<00:53:12.800><c> agree</c><00:53:13.280><c> that</c><00:53:13.599><c> trans</c><00:53:13.920><c> women</c><00:53:14.240><c> are</c><00:53:14.400><c> women</c><00:53:15.119><c> or</c>

00:53:15.589 --> 00:53:15.599 align:start position:0%
not agree that trans women are women or
 

00:53:15.599 --> 00:53:18.150 align:start position:0%
not agree that trans women are women or
are<00:53:16.000><c> biological</c><00:53:16.640><c> women,</c><00:53:17.520><c> they</c><00:53:17.760><c> are</c><00:53:17.920><c> going</c><00:53:18.000><c> to</c>

00:53:18.150 --> 00:53:18.160 align:start position:0%
are biological women, they are going to
 

00:53:18.160 --> 00:53:22.710 align:start position:0%
are biological women, they are going to
get<00:53:18.400><c> their</c><00:53:18.640><c> way.</c><00:53:19.760><c> And</c><00:53:20.079><c> the</c><00:53:20.319><c> 1%</c><00:53:20.880><c> of</c><00:53:21.359><c> ridiculous</c>

00:53:22.710 --> 00:53:22.720 align:start position:0%
get their way. And the 1% of ridiculous
 

00:53:22.720 --> 00:53:25.270 align:start position:0%
get their way. And the 1% of ridiculous
radical<00:53:23.200><c> leftists</c><00:53:24.480><c> are</c><00:53:24.720><c> not</c><00:53:24.880><c> going</c><00:53:24.960><c> to</c><00:53:25.119><c> get</c>

00:53:25.270 --> 00:53:25.280 align:start position:0%
radical leftists are not going to get
 

00:53:25.280 --> 00:53:27.750 align:start position:0%
radical leftists are not going to get
that<00:53:25.440><c> way.</c><00:53:26.319><c> And</c><00:53:26.559><c> there's</c><00:53:26.880><c> no</c><00:53:27.119><c> space</c><00:53:27.440><c> in</c><00:53:27.599><c> the</c>

00:53:27.750 --> 00:53:27.760 align:start position:0%
that way. And there's no space in the
 

00:53:27.760 --> 00:53:29.750 align:start position:0%
that way. And there's no space in the
middle<00:53:28.720><c> for</c><00:53:28.880><c> you</c><00:53:28.960><c> to</c><00:53:29.119><c> carve</c><00:53:29.359><c> out</c><00:53:29.520><c> a</c>

00:53:29.750 --> 00:53:29.760 align:start position:0%
middle for you to carve out a
 

00:53:29.760 --> 00:53:31.829 align:start position:0%
middle for you to carve out a
compromise.<00:53:30.160><c> Dev,</c><00:53:30.559><c> I</c><00:53:30.720><c> hate</c><00:53:30.880><c> to</c><00:53:31.040><c> say</c><00:53:31.119><c> it.</c><00:53:31.599><c> Even</c>

00:53:31.829 --> 00:53:31.839 align:start position:0%
compromise. Dev, I hate to say it. Even
 

00:53:31.839 --> 00:53:33.910 align:start position:0%
compromise. Dev, I hate to say it. Even
though<00:53:32.000><c> my</c><00:53:32.319><c> liberal</c><00:53:32.720><c> centrist</c><00:53:33.119><c> compromise</c><00:53:33.680><c> is</c>

00:53:33.910 --> 00:53:33.920 align:start position:0%
though my liberal centrist compromise is
 

00:53:33.920 --> 00:53:35.990 align:start position:0%
though my liberal centrist compromise is
the<00:53:34.079><c> position</c><00:53:34.480><c> most</c><00:53:34.800><c> in</c><00:53:35.040><c> line</c><00:53:35.200><c> with</c><00:53:35.359><c> reality,</c>

00:53:35.990 --> 00:53:36.000 align:start position:0%
the position most in line with reality,
 

00:53:36.000 --> 00:53:37.990 align:start position:0%
the position most in line with reality,
if<00:53:36.240><c> trans</c><00:53:36.640><c> activists</c><00:53:37.119><c> themselves</c><00:53:37.680><c> aren't</c>

00:53:37.990 --> 00:53:38.000 align:start position:0%
if trans activists themselves aren't
 

00:53:38.000 --> 00:53:39.670 align:start position:0%
if trans activists themselves aren't
going<00:53:38.079><c> to</c><00:53:38.240><c> support</c><00:53:38.480><c> it,</c><00:53:38.800><c> then</c><00:53:39.040><c> the</c><00:53:39.280><c> remaining</c>

00:53:39.670 --> 00:53:39.680 align:start position:0%
going to support it, then the remaining
 

00:53:39.680 --> 00:53:41.829 align:start position:0%
going to support it, then the remaining
possibilities<00:53:40.480><c> are</c><00:53:40.960><c> convince</c><00:53:41.359><c> the</c><00:53:41.520><c> majority</c>

00:53:41.829 --> 00:53:41.839 align:start position:0%
possibilities are convince the majority
 

00:53:41.839 --> 00:53:43.589 align:start position:0%
possibilities are convince the majority
of<00:53:42.000><c> the</c><00:53:42.160><c> world</c><00:53:42.400><c> that</c><00:53:42.640><c> trans</c><00:53:42.960><c> women</c><00:53:43.119><c> and</c><00:53:43.359><c> sis</c>

00:53:43.589 --> 00:53:43.599 align:start position:0%
of the world that trans women and sis
 

00:53:43.599 --> 00:53:45.270 align:start position:0%
of the world that trans women and sis
women<00:53:43.920><c> have</c><00:53:44.160><c> no</c><00:53:44.400><c> real</c><00:53:44.640><c> differences</c><00:53:45.040><c> between</c>

00:53:45.270 --> 00:53:45.280 align:start position:0%
women have no real differences between
 

00:53:45.280 --> 00:53:46.710 align:start position:0%
women have no real differences between
them,<00:53:45.520><c> which</c><00:53:45.760><c> you</c><00:53:45.920><c> are</c><00:53:46.079><c> not</c><00:53:46.240><c> going</c><00:53:46.400><c> to</c><00:53:46.480><c> do</c>

00:53:46.710 --> 00:53:46.720 align:start position:0%
them, which you are not going to do
 

00:53:46.720 --> 00:53:49.109 align:start position:0%
them, which you are not going to do
because<00:53:46.960><c> it</c><00:53:47.200><c> is</c><00:53:47.359><c> self-evidently</c><00:53:48.160><c> false,</c><00:53:48.720><c> or</c>

00:53:49.109 --> 00:53:49.119 align:start position:0%
because it is self-evidently false, or
 

00:53:49.119 --> 00:53:50.790 align:start position:0%
because it is self-evidently false, or
convince<00:53:49.520><c> the</c><00:53:49.680><c> majority</c><00:53:50.000><c> of</c><00:53:50.160><c> the</c><00:53:50.319><c> world</c><00:53:50.480><c> that</c>

00:53:50.790 --> 00:53:50.800 align:start position:0%
convince the majority of the world that
 

00:53:50.800 --> 00:53:52.630 align:start position:0%
convince the majority of the world that
trans<00:53:51.119><c> women</c><00:53:51.359><c> are</c><00:53:51.599><c> men</c><00:53:51.760><c> in</c><00:53:52.000><c> dresses,</c><00:53:52.480><c> which</c>

00:53:52.630 --> 00:53:52.640 align:start position:0%
trans women are men in dresses, which
 

00:53:52.640 --> 00:53:54.950 align:start position:0%
trans women are men in dresses, which
also<00:53:52.880><c> isn't</c><00:53:53.119><c> really</c><00:53:53.359><c> true,</c><00:53:53.760><c> but</c><00:53:54.000><c> it</c><00:53:54.240><c> is</c><00:53:54.480><c> a</c><00:53:54.720><c> lot</c>

00:53:54.950 --> 00:53:54.960 align:start position:0%
also isn't really true, but it is a lot
 

00:53:54.960 --> 00:53:56.710 align:start position:0%
also isn't really true, but it is a lot
easier<00:53:55.280><c> to</c><00:53:55.440><c> convince</c><00:53:55.760><c> people</c><00:53:55.920><c> of,</c><00:53:56.400><c> which</c><00:53:56.559><c> is</c>

00:53:56.710 --> 00:53:56.720 align:start position:0%
easier to convince people of, which is
 

00:53:56.720 --> 00:53:58.630 align:start position:0%
easier to convince people of, which is
why<00:53:56.880><c> in</c><00:53:57.119><c> the</c><00:53:57.200><c> absence</c><00:53:57.520><c> of</c><00:53:57.760><c> liberals</c><00:53:58.160><c> like</c><00:53:58.319><c> me,</c>

00:53:58.630 --> 00:53:58.640 align:start position:0%
why in the absence of liberals like me,
 

00:53:58.640 --> 00:54:00.470 align:start position:0%
why in the absence of liberals like me,
right-wingers<00:53:59.280><c> win</c><00:53:59.520><c> the</c><00:53:59.760><c> argument.</c><00:54:00.319><c> And</c>

00:54:00.470 --> 00:54:00.480 align:start position:0%
right-wingers win the argument. And
 

00:54:00.480 --> 00:54:02.470 align:start position:0%
right-wingers win the argument. And
guess<00:54:00.720><c> what?</c><00:54:01.040><c> Nara</c><00:54:01.599><c> is</c><00:54:01.760><c> not</c><00:54:01.920><c> actually</c><00:54:02.160><c> that</c>

00:54:02.470 --> 00:54:02.480 align:start position:0%
guess what? Nara is not actually that
 

00:54:02.480 --> 00:54:04.630 align:start position:0%
guess what? Nara is not actually that
stupid<00:54:02.800><c> because</c><00:54:03.119><c> even</c><00:54:03.359><c> she</c><00:54:03.599><c> knows</c><00:54:03.839><c> this.</c><00:54:04.400><c> Here</c>

00:54:04.630 --> 00:54:04.640 align:start position:0%
stupid because even she knows this. Here
 

00:54:04.640 --> 00:54:07.109 align:start position:0%
stupid because even she knows this. Here
is<00:54:04.880><c> Niara</c><00:54:05.599><c> ultimately</c><00:54:06.079><c> agreeing</c><00:54:06.559><c> with</c><00:54:06.800><c> my</c>

00:54:07.109 --> 00:54:07.119 align:start position:0%
is Niara ultimately agreeing with my
 

00:54:07.119 --> 00:54:09.030 align:start position:0%
is Niara ultimately agreeing with my
position<00:54:07.599><c> in</c><00:54:07.839><c> the</c><00:54:08.000><c> face</c><00:54:08.240><c> of</c><00:54:08.480><c> right-wing</c>

00:54:09.030 --> 00:54:09.040 align:start position:0%
position in the face of right-wing
 

00:54:09.040 --> 00:54:11.190 align:start position:0%
position in the face of right-wing
victories<00:54:09.520><c> on</c><00:54:09.839><c> trans</c><00:54:10.240><c> topics.</c><00:54:10.880><c> Here's</c>

00:54:11.190 --> 00:54:11.200 align:start position:0%
victories on trans topics. Here's
 

00:54:11.200 --> 00:54:12.790 align:start position:0%
victories on trans topics. Here's
another<00:54:11.520><c> prominent</c><00:54:11.920><c> trans</c><00:54:12.240><c> account</c><00:54:12.480><c> who</c>

00:54:12.790 --> 00:54:12.800 align:start position:0%
another prominent trans account who
 

00:54:12.800 --> 00:54:14.630 align:start position:0%
another prominent trans account who
blocked<00:54:13.119><c> me</c><00:54:13.359><c> long</c><00:54:13.599><c> ago</c><00:54:13.839><c> for</c><00:54:14.079><c> my</c><00:54:14.240><c> apparent</c>

00:54:14.630 --> 00:54:14.640 align:start position:0%
blocked me long ago for my apparent
 

00:54:14.640 --> 00:54:17.030 align:start position:0%
blocked me long ago for my apparent
transphobia,<00:54:15.599><c> saying</c><00:54:15.839><c> the</c><00:54:16.160><c> exact</c><00:54:16.559><c> same</c>

00:54:17.030 --> 00:54:17.040 align:start position:0%
transphobia, saying the exact same
 

00:54:17.040 --> 00:54:19.030 align:start position:0%
transphobia, saying the exact same
so-called<00:54:17.839><c> transphobic</c><00:54:18.480><c> things</c><00:54:18.640><c> that</c><00:54:18.880><c> I</c>

00:54:19.030 --> 00:54:19.040 align:start position:0%
so-called transphobic things that I
 

00:54:19.040 --> 00:54:21.349 align:start position:0%
so-called transphobic things that I
said.<00:54:19.520><c> Compare</c><00:54:19.920><c> these</c><00:54:20.319><c> two</c><00:54:20.559><c> to</c><00:54:20.880><c> this</c><00:54:21.119><c> other</c>

00:54:21.349 --> 00:54:21.359 align:start position:0%
said. Compare these two to this other
 

00:54:21.359 --> 00:54:22.870 align:start position:0%
said. Compare these two to this other
large<00:54:21.760><c> trans</c><00:54:22.079><c> account</c><00:54:22.240><c> who</c><00:54:22.480><c> jumped</c><00:54:22.640><c> into</c><00:54:22.800><c> the</c>

00:54:22.870 --> 00:54:22.880 align:start position:0%
large trans account who jumped into the
 

00:54:22.880 --> 00:54:24.630 align:start position:0%
large trans account who jumped into the
convo,<00:54:23.280><c> and</c><00:54:23.440><c> you'll</c><00:54:23.599><c> see</c><00:54:23.680><c> what</c><00:54:23.839><c> I</c><00:54:24.000><c> mean.</c><00:54:24.319><c> I'm</c>

00:54:24.630 --> 00:54:24.640 align:start position:0%
convo, and you'll see what I mean. I'm
 

00:54:24.640 --> 00:54:26.630 align:start position:0%
convo, and you'll see what I mean. I'm
sorry,<00:54:25.040><c> liberals,</c><00:54:25.520><c> but</c><00:54:25.760><c> it</c><00:54:25.920><c> really</c><00:54:26.160><c> is</c><00:54:26.400><c> the</c>

00:54:26.630 --> 00:54:26.640 align:start position:0%
sorry, liberals, but it really is the
 

00:54:26.640 --> 00:54:28.630 align:start position:0%
sorry, liberals, but it really is the
case<00:54:26.880><c> that</c><00:54:27.119><c> you</c><00:54:27.359><c> have</c><00:54:27.440><c> to</c><00:54:27.599><c> accept</c><00:54:28.079><c> trans</c><00:54:28.319><c> women</c>

00:54:28.630 --> 00:54:28.640 align:start position:0%
case that you have to accept trans women
 

00:54:28.640 --> 00:54:31.109 align:start position:0%
case that you have to accept trans women
in<00:54:28.880><c> sports</c><00:54:29.280><c> if</c><00:54:29.520><c> you</c><00:54:29.680><c> don't</c><00:54:29.839><c> want</c><00:54:30.079><c> fascism.</c><00:54:30.960><c> You</c>

00:54:31.109 --> 00:54:31.119 align:start position:0%
in sports if you don't want fascism. You
 

00:54:31.119 --> 00:54:33.430 align:start position:0%
in sports if you don't want fascism. You
are<00:54:31.280><c> doing</c><00:54:31.599><c> exactly</c><00:54:32.079><c> what</c><00:54:32.319><c> Sargon</c><00:54:32.880><c> said.</c><00:54:33.200><c> You</c>

00:54:33.430 --> 00:54:33.440 align:start position:0%
are doing exactly what Sargon said. You
 

00:54:33.440 --> 00:54:35.430 align:start position:0%
are doing exactly what Sargon said. You
are<00:54:33.599><c> signing</c><00:54:33.920><c> your</c><00:54:34.160><c> own</c><00:54:34.400><c> death</c><00:54:34.720><c> warrant.</c><00:54:35.280><c> You</c>

00:54:35.430 --> 00:54:35.440 align:start position:0%
are signing your own death warrant. You
 

00:54:35.440 --> 00:54:37.190 align:start position:0%
are signing your own death warrant. You
are<00:54:35.599><c> an</c><00:54:35.839><c> idiot.</c><00:54:36.319><c> I</c><00:54:36.559><c> talked</c><00:54:36.720><c> about</c><00:54:36.880><c> this</c>

00:54:37.190 --> 00:54:37.200 align:start position:0%
are an idiot. I talked about this
 

00:54:37.200 --> 00:54:39.030 align:start position:0%
are an idiot. I talked about this
specific<00:54:37.599><c> dumb</c><00:54:37.920><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:54:38.160><c> the</c><00:54:38.319><c> last</c><00:54:38.480><c> time</c><00:54:38.559><c> I</c><00:54:38.720><c> did</c><00:54:38.880><c> a</c>

00:54:39.030 --> 00:54:39.040 align:start position:0%
specific dumb [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] the last time I did a
 

00:54:39.040 --> 00:54:40.870 align:start position:0%
specific dumb [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] the last time I did a
video<00:54:39.119><c> on</c><00:54:39.359><c> transwomen</c><00:54:39.839><c> women</c><00:54:40.160><c> sports.</c><00:54:40.559><c> So,</c><00:54:40.720><c> we</c>

00:54:40.870 --> 00:54:40.880 align:start position:0%
video on transwomen women sports. So, we
 

00:54:40.880 --> 00:54:42.230 align:start position:0%
video on transwomen women sports. So, we
don't<00:54:40.960><c> got</c><00:54:41.119><c> to</c><00:54:41.280><c> spend</c><00:54:41.440><c> too</c><00:54:41.599><c> much</c><00:54:41.760><c> time</c><00:54:41.920><c> on</c><00:54:42.079><c> her</c>

00:54:42.230 --> 00:54:42.240 align:start position:0%
don't got to spend too much time on her
 

00:54:42.240 --> 00:54:43.910 align:start position:0%
don't got to spend too much time on her
stupidity.<00:54:42.960><c> Even</c><00:54:43.200><c> though</c><00:54:43.359><c> both</c><00:54:43.599><c> of</c><00:54:43.680><c> these</c>

00:54:43.910 --> 00:54:43.920 align:start position:0%
stupidity. Even though both of these
 

00:54:43.920 --> 00:54:46.150 align:start position:0%
stupidity. Even though both of these
groups<00:54:44.160><c> are</c><00:54:44.319><c> wrong,</c><00:54:44.640><c> Sargon's</c><00:54:45.280><c> group</c><00:54:45.599><c> is</c><00:54:45.920><c> less</c>

00:54:46.150 --> 00:54:46.160 align:start position:0%
groups are wrong, Sargon's group is less
 

00:54:46.160 --> 00:54:48.309 align:start position:0%
groups are wrong, Sargon's group is less
wrong<00:54:46.400><c> than</c><00:54:46.559><c> Niara's.</c><00:54:47.280><c> And</c><00:54:47.359><c> if</c><00:54:47.520><c> the</c><00:54:47.760><c> battle</c><00:54:48.000><c> is</c>

00:54:48.309 --> 00:54:48.319 align:start position:0%
wrong than Niara's. And if the battle is
 

00:54:48.319 --> 00:54:50.230 align:start position:0%
wrong than Niara's. And if the battle is
only<00:54:48.720><c> fought</c><00:54:49.040><c> between</c><00:54:49.280><c> these</c><00:54:49.599><c> two</c><00:54:49.760><c> groups,</c>

00:54:50.230 --> 00:54:50.240 align:start position:0%
only fought between these two groups,
 

00:54:50.240 --> 00:54:52.230 align:start position:0%
only fought between these two groups,
Sargon<00:54:50.720><c> wins.</c><00:54:51.200><c> But</c><00:54:51.280><c> my</c><00:54:51.520><c> position</c><00:54:51.839><c> is</c><00:54:52.079><c> actually</c>

00:54:52.230 --> 00:54:52.240 align:start position:0%
Sargon wins. But my position is actually
 

00:54:52.240 --> 00:54:53.750 align:start position:0%
Sargon wins. But my position is actually
the<00:54:52.400><c> correct</c><00:54:52.640><c> one.</c><00:54:52.880><c> And</c><00:54:53.119><c> more</c><00:54:53.280><c> importantly,</c>

00:54:53.750 --> 00:54:53.760 align:start position:0%
the correct one. And more importantly,
 

00:54:53.760 --> 00:54:55.990 align:start position:0%
the correct one. And more importantly,
it's<00:54:54.000><c> the</c><00:54:54.240><c> one</c><00:54:54.400><c> that</c><00:54:54.720><c> actually</c><00:54:55.119><c> defends</c><00:54:55.599><c> trans</c>

00:54:55.990 --> 00:54:56.000 align:start position:0%
it's the one that actually defends trans
 

00:54:56.000 --> 00:54:57.910 align:start position:0%
it's the one that actually defends trans
people's<00:54:56.480><c> rights</c><00:54:56.800><c> in</c><00:54:57.119><c> the</c><00:54:57.280><c> real</c><00:54:57.440><c> world.</c><00:54:57.839><c> And</c>

00:54:57.910 --> 00:54:57.920 align:start position:0%
people's rights in the real world. And
 

00:54:57.920 --> 00:54:59.510 align:start position:0%
people's rights in the real world. And
I'm<00:54:58.079><c> not</c><00:54:58.240><c> just</c><00:54:58.400><c> saying</c><00:54:58.559><c> this.</c><00:54:58.880><c> We</c><00:54:59.119><c> can</c><00:54:59.200><c> test</c><00:54:59.359><c> it</c>

00:54:59.510 --> 00:54:59.520 align:start position:0%
I'm not just saying this. We can test it
 

00:54:59.520 --> 00:55:01.829 align:start position:0%
I'm not just saying this. We can test it
empirically.<00:55:00.240><c> The</c><00:55:00.480><c> liberal</c><00:55:00.880><c> streamer</c><00:55:01.280><c> Hutch</c>

00:55:01.829 --> 00:55:01.839 align:start position:0%
empirically. The liberal streamer Hutch
 

00:55:01.839 --> 00:55:03.589 align:start position:0%
empirically. The liberal streamer Hutch
interviewed<00:55:02.240><c> Laxsha</c><00:55:02.800><c> Jane</c><00:55:03.119><c> on</c><00:55:03.280><c> stream</c>

00:55:03.589 --> 00:55:03.599 align:start position:0%
interviewed Laxsha Jane on stream
 

00:55:03.599 --> 00:55:05.349 align:start position:0%
interviewed Laxsha Jane on stream
recently.<00:55:04.240><c> Laksha</c><00:55:04.720><c> works</c><00:55:04.880><c> for</c><00:55:04.960><c> a</c><00:55:05.119><c> liberal</c>

00:55:05.349 --> 00:55:05.359 align:start position:0%
recently. Laksha works for a liberal
 

00:55:05.359 --> 00:55:06.630 align:start position:0%
recently. Laksha works for a liberal
political<00:55:05.599><c> outlet</c><00:55:05.920><c> called</c><00:55:06.079><c> The</c><00:55:06.240><c> Argument,</c>

00:55:06.630 --> 00:55:06.640 align:start position:0%
political outlet called The Argument,
 

00:55:06.640 --> 00:55:08.390 align:start position:0%
political outlet called The Argument,
and<00:55:06.800><c> he</c><00:55:06.960><c> runs</c><00:55:07.200><c> the</c><00:55:07.359><c> organization</c><00:55:08.079><c> Split</c>

00:55:08.390 --> 00:55:08.400 align:start position:0%
and he runs the organization Split
 

00:55:08.400 --> 00:55:10.230 align:start position:0%
and he runs the organization Split
Ticket,<00:55:08.720><c> which</c><00:55:08.960><c> is</c><00:55:09.040><c> a</c><00:55:09.200><c> polling</c><00:55:09.520><c> organization.</c>

00:55:10.230 --> 00:55:10.240 align:start position:0%
Ticket, which is a polling organization.
 

00:55:10.240 --> 00:55:12.309 align:start position:0%
Ticket, which is a polling organization.
He<00:55:10.400><c> is</c><00:55:10.559><c> a</c><00:55:10.720><c> pollster</c><00:55:11.200><c> by</c><00:55:11.440><c> trade.</c><00:55:11.760><c> His</c><00:55:12.160><c> whole</c>

00:55:12.309 --> 00:55:12.319 align:start position:0%
He is a pollster by trade. His whole
 

00:55:12.319 --> 00:55:14.150 align:start position:0%
He is a pollster by trade. His whole
deal<00:55:12.480><c> is</c><00:55:12.640><c> that</c><00:55:12.800><c> he</c><00:55:12.960><c> collects</c><00:55:13.280><c> real</c><00:55:13.599><c> world</c><00:55:13.839><c> data</c>

00:55:14.150 --> 00:55:14.160 align:start position:0%
deal is that he collects real world data
 

00:55:14.160 --> 00:55:16.069 align:start position:0%
deal is that he collects real world data
from<00:55:14.400><c> real</c><00:55:14.720><c> world</c><00:55:14.960><c> voters</c><00:55:15.440><c> to</c><00:55:15.680><c> see</c><00:55:15.839><c> how</c>

00:55:16.069 --> 00:55:16.079 align:start position:0%
from real world voters to see how
 

00:55:16.079 --> 00:55:17.430 align:start position:0%
from real world voters to see how
Americans<00:55:16.559><c> are</c><00:55:16.720><c> currently</c><00:55:17.040><c> feeling</c><00:55:17.280><c> about</c>

00:55:17.430 --> 00:55:17.440 align:start position:0%
Americans are currently feeling about
 

00:55:17.440 --> 00:55:19.589 align:start position:0%
Americans are currently feeling about
the<00:55:17.599><c> issues</c><00:55:18.079><c> with</c><00:55:18.240><c> the</c><00:55:18.480><c> aim</c><00:55:18.720><c> of</c><00:55:18.960><c> using</c><00:55:19.359><c> that</c>

00:55:19.589 --> 00:55:19.599 align:start position:0%
the issues with the aim of using that
 

00:55:19.599 --> 00:55:22.069 align:start position:0%
the issues with the aim of using that
data<00:55:19.920><c> to</c><00:55:20.160><c> advise</c><00:55:20.640><c> Democratic</c><00:55:21.200><c> politicians</c><00:55:21.760><c> on</c>

00:55:22.069 --> 00:55:22.079 align:start position:0%
data to advise Democratic politicians on
 

00:55:22.079 --> 00:55:24.710 align:start position:0%
data to advise Democratic politicians on
how<00:55:22.160><c> to</c><00:55:22.319><c> get</c><00:55:22.480><c> elected.</c><00:55:23.200><c> So</c><00:55:23.680><c> here</c><00:55:23.839><c> is</c><00:55:24.079><c> Laksha's</c>

00:55:24.710 --> 00:55:24.720 align:start position:0%
how to get elected. So here is Laksha's
 

00:55:24.720 --> 00:55:26.790 align:start position:0%
how to get elected. So here is Laksha's
view<00:55:24.960><c> on</c><00:55:25.200><c> the</c><00:55:25.359><c> current</c><00:55:25.599><c> polling</c><00:55:26.000><c> data</c><00:55:26.400><c> on</c><00:55:26.559><c> the</c>

00:55:26.790 --> 00:55:26.800 align:start position:0%
view on the current polling data on the
 

00:55:26.800 --> 00:55:29.349 align:start position:0%
view on the current polling data on the
issue<00:55:27.040><c> that</c><00:55:27.280><c> this</c><00:55:27.599><c> joy</c><00:55:28.000><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:55:28.559><c> demands</c><00:55:29.040><c> that</c>

00:55:29.349 --> 00:55:29.359 align:start position:0%
issue that this joy [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] demands that
 

00:55:29.359 --> 00:55:30.870 align:start position:0%
issue that this joy [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] demands that
liberals<00:55:29.839><c> accept</c><00:55:30.319><c> or</c><00:55:30.480><c> else</c><00:55:30.640><c> they're</c>

00:55:30.870 --> 00:55:30.880 align:start position:0%
liberals accept or else they're
 

00:55:30.880 --> 00:55:32.630 align:start position:0%
liberals accept or else they're
fascists.<00:55:31.520><c> The</c><00:55:31.760><c> trans</c><00:55:32.000><c> women</c><00:55:32.240><c> in</c><00:55:32.400><c> women's</c>

00:55:32.630 --> 00:55:32.640 align:start position:0%
fascists. The trans women in women's
 

00:55:32.640 --> 00:55:34.630 align:start position:0%
fascists. The trans women in women's
sports<00:55:32.960><c> issue.</c><00:55:33.359><c> Forget</c><00:55:33.680><c> about</c><00:55:33.839><c> ideology.</c>

00:55:34.630 --> 00:55:34.640 align:start position:0%
sports issue. Forget about ideology.
 

00:55:34.640 --> 00:55:37.109 align:start position:0%
sports issue. Forget about ideology.
What<00:55:34.800><c> do</c><00:55:34.960><c> the</c><00:55:35.200><c> raw</c><00:55:35.520><c> facts</c><00:55:36.000><c> say</c><00:55:36.319><c> about</c><00:55:36.640><c> how</c><00:55:36.880><c> this</c>

00:55:37.109 --> 00:55:37.119 align:start position:0%
What do the raw facts say about how this
 

00:55:37.119 --> 00:55:38.870 align:start position:0%
What do the raw facts say about how this
issue<00:55:37.520><c> intersects</c><00:55:38.240><c> with</c><00:55:38.480><c> candidate</c>

00:55:38.870 --> 00:55:38.880 align:start position:0%
issue intersects with candidate
 

00:55:38.880 --> 00:55:40.870 align:start position:0%
issue intersects with candidate
electability?<00:55:39.760><c> you</c><00:55:39.920><c> you</c><00:55:40.319><c> recently</c><00:55:40.559><c> came</c><00:55:40.720><c> out</c>

00:55:40.870 --> 00:55:40.880 align:start position:0%
electability? you you recently came out
 

00:55:40.880 --> 00:55:43.109 align:start position:0%
electability? you you recently came out
Laksha<00:55:41.440><c> with</c><00:55:41.680><c> an</c><00:55:41.920><c> article</c><00:55:42.400><c> kind</c><00:55:42.640><c> of</c><00:55:42.800><c> exploring</c>

00:55:43.109 --> 00:55:43.119 align:start position:0%
Laksha with an article kind of exploring
 

00:55:43.119 --> 00:55:46.470 align:start position:0%
Laksha with an article kind of exploring
the<00:55:43.280><c> trans</c><00:55:43.599><c> issue</c><00:55:43.839><c> for</c><00:55:44.000><c> Democrats.</c><00:55:45.040><c> Um</c><00:55:46.160><c> how</c><00:55:46.319><c> do</c>

00:55:46.470 --> 00:55:46.480 align:start position:0%
the trans issue for Democrats. Um how do
 

00:55:46.480 --> 00:55:49.510 align:start position:0%
the trans issue for Democrats. Um how do
you<00:55:47.280><c> how</c><00:55:47.520><c> do</c><00:55:47.599><c> you</c><00:55:47.760><c> s</c><00:55:48.079><c> you</c><00:55:48.240><c> know</c><00:55:48.799><c> what</c><00:55:48.880><c> what</c><00:55:49.280><c> if</c>

00:55:49.510 --> 00:55:49.520 align:start position:0%
you how do you s you know what what if
 

00:55:49.520 --> 00:55:51.270 align:start position:0%
you how do you s you know what what if
you<00:55:49.599><c> were</c><00:55:49.760><c> advising</c><00:55:50.079><c> a</c><00:55:50.319><c> campaign</c><00:55:50.880><c> like</c><00:55:51.119><c> how</c>

00:55:51.270 --> 00:55:51.280 align:start position:0%
you were advising a campaign like how
 

00:55:51.280 --> 00:55:54.710 align:start position:0%
you were advising a campaign like how
would<00:55:51.440><c> you</c><00:55:51.760><c> advise</c><00:55:52.400><c> them</c><00:55:52.880><c> to</c><00:55:53.839><c> uh</c><00:55:54.160><c> respond</c><00:55:54.480><c> to</c>

00:55:54.710 --> 00:55:54.720 align:start position:0%
would you advise them to uh respond to
 

00:55:54.720 --> 00:55:56.630 align:start position:0%
would you advise them to uh respond to
questions<00:55:55.200><c> like</c><00:55:55.599><c> you</c><00:55:55.760><c> know</c><00:55:55.920><c> should</c><00:55:56.240><c> trans</c>

00:55:56.630 --> 00:55:56.640 align:start position:0%
questions like you know should trans
 

00:55:56.640 --> 00:55:59.510 align:start position:0%
questions like you know should trans
girls<00:55:56.960><c> play</c><00:55:57.200><c> in</c><00:55:57.359><c> sports?</c>

00:55:59.510 --> 00:55:59.520 align:start position:0%
girls play in sports?
 

00:55:59.520 --> 00:56:01.109 align:start position:0%
girls play in sports?
&gt;&gt; You<00:55:59.680><c> say</c><00:55:59.920><c> no</c><00:56:00.079><c> if</c><00:56:00.319><c> you're</c><00:56:00.400><c> in</c><00:56:00.480><c> a</c><00:56:00.640><c> swing</c><00:56:00.880><c> state</c>

00:56:01.109 --> 00:56:01.119 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; You say no if you're in a swing state
 

00:56:01.119 --> 00:56:02.470 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; You say no if you're in a swing state
and<00:56:01.280><c> if</c><00:56:01.440><c> you're</c><00:56:01.520><c> in</c><00:56:01.680><c> Manhattan</c><00:56:02.160><c> you</c><00:56:02.400><c> say</c>

00:56:02.470 --> 00:56:02.480 align:start position:0%
and if you're in Manhattan you say
 

00:56:02.480 --> 00:56:05.589 align:start position:0%
and if you're in Manhattan you say
whatever<00:56:02.799><c> the</c><00:56:02.880><c> hell</c><00:56:03.040><c> you</c><00:56:03.280><c> want.</c><00:56:04.319><c> Um,</c><00:56:05.359><c> it's</c>

00:56:05.589 --> 00:56:05.599 align:start position:0%
whatever the hell you want. Um, it's
 

00:56:05.599 --> 00:56:07.270 align:start position:0%
whatever the hell you want. Um, it's
just<00:56:05.760><c> like</c><00:56:06.079><c> this</c><00:56:06.319><c> is</c><00:56:06.400><c> something</c><00:56:06.640><c> where</c><00:56:06.960><c> like</c>

00:56:07.270 --> 00:56:07.280 align:start position:0%
just like this is something where like
 

00:56:07.280 --> 00:56:09.109 align:start position:0%
just like this is something where like
outside<00:56:07.599><c> of</c><00:56:07.839><c> like</c><00:56:08.079><c> Manhattan,</c><00:56:08.880><c> San</c>

00:56:09.109 --> 00:56:09.119 align:start position:0%
outside of like Manhattan, San
 

00:56:09.119 --> 00:56:11.990 align:start position:0%
outside of like Manhattan, San
Francisco,<00:56:10.400><c> like</c><00:56:10.640><c> you</c><00:56:10.880><c> know,</c><00:56:11.040><c> the</c><00:56:11.280><c> blest</c><00:56:11.839><c> of</c>

00:56:11.990 --> 00:56:12.000 align:start position:0%
Francisco, like you know, the blest of
 

00:56:12.000 --> 00:56:14.470 align:start position:0%
Francisco, like you know, the blest of
blue<00:56:12.400><c> areas,</c><00:56:13.119><c> people</c><00:56:13.520><c> just</c><00:56:13.839><c> straight</c><00:56:14.079><c> up</c><00:56:14.240><c> do</c>

00:56:14.470 --> 00:56:14.480 align:start position:0%
blue areas, people just straight up do
 

00:56:14.480 --> 00:56:16.309 align:start position:0%
blue areas, people just straight up do
not<00:56:14.640><c> agree.</c><00:56:15.040><c> It</c><00:56:15.280><c> does</c><00:56:15.440><c> not</c><00:56:15.680><c> make</c><00:56:15.920><c> sense</c><00:56:16.160><c> to</c>

00:56:16.309 --> 00:56:16.319 align:start position:0%
not agree. It does not make sense to
 

00:56:16.319 --> 00:56:18.710 align:start position:0%
not agree. It does not make sense to
make<00:56:16.480><c> this</c><00:56:16.720><c> a</c><00:56:16.880><c> flash</c><00:56:17.200><c> point.</c><00:56:17.920><c> I</c><00:56:18.240><c> understand</c>

00:56:18.710 --> 00:56:18.720 align:start position:0%
make this a flash point. I understand
 

00:56:18.720 --> 00:56:20.470 align:start position:0%
make this a flash point. I understand
that<00:56:19.040><c> people</c><00:56:19.280><c> say</c><00:56:19.520><c> if</c><00:56:19.680><c> you</c><00:56:19.760><c> give</c><00:56:19.920><c> an</c><00:56:20.079><c> inch,</c><00:56:20.319><c> you</c>

00:56:20.470 --> 00:56:20.480 align:start position:0%
that people say if you give an inch, you
 

00:56:20.480 --> 00:56:22.789 align:start position:0%
that people say if you give an inch, you
seat<00:56:20.640><c> a</c><00:56:20.880><c> mile.</c><00:56:21.200><c> But</c><00:56:21.280><c> the</c><00:56:21.440><c> truth</c><00:56:21.680><c> is,</c><00:56:22.400><c> at</c><00:56:22.640><c> this</c>

00:56:22.789 --> 00:56:22.799 align:start position:0%
seat a mile. But the truth is, at this
 

00:56:22.799 --> 00:56:24.549 align:start position:0%
seat a mile. But the truth is, at this
point,<00:56:23.040><c> you've</c><00:56:23.359><c> already</c><00:56:23.680><c> seated</c><00:56:24.000><c> the</c><00:56:24.160><c> mile.</c>

00:56:24.549 --> 00:56:24.559 align:start position:0%
point, you've already seated the mile.
 

00:56:24.559 --> 00:56:26.390 align:start position:0%
point, you've already seated the mile.
Now<00:56:24.720><c> you're</c><00:56:24.960><c> trying</c><00:56:25.119><c> to</c><00:56:25.280><c> get</c><00:56:25.440><c> back</c><00:56:26.000><c> a</c><00:56:26.319><c> little</c>

00:56:26.390 --> 00:56:26.400 align:start position:0%
Now you're trying to get back a little
 

00:56:26.400 --> 00:56:29.190 align:start position:0%
Now you're trying to get back a little
bit<00:56:26.559><c> of</c><00:56:26.720><c> that</c><00:56:26.960><c> ground.</c><00:56:27.440><c> And</c><00:56:27.680><c> by</c><00:56:27.920><c> insisting</c><00:56:28.880><c> on</c>

00:56:29.190 --> 00:56:29.200 align:start position:0%
bit of that ground. And by insisting on
 

00:56:29.200 --> 00:56:31.109 align:start position:0%
bit of that ground. And by insisting on
something<00:56:29.520><c> that</c><00:56:29.760><c> even</c><00:56:30.000><c> your</c><00:56:30.319><c> own</c><00:56:30.559><c> base</c>

00:56:31.109 --> 00:56:31.119 align:start position:0%
something that even your own base
 

00:56:31.119 --> 00:56:33.430 align:start position:0%
something that even your own base
doesn't<00:56:31.520><c> agree</c><00:56:31.920><c> with,</c><00:56:32.480><c> you</c><00:56:32.720><c> are</c><00:56:32.960><c> basically</c>

00:56:33.430 --> 00:56:33.440 align:start position:0%
doesn't agree with, you are basically
 

00:56:33.440 --> 00:56:35.270 align:start position:0%
doesn't agree with, you are basically
just<00:56:33.760><c> endangering</c><00:56:34.559><c> everything</c><00:56:34.960><c> else</c>

00:56:35.270 --> 00:56:35.280 align:start position:0%
just endangering everything else
 

00:56:35.280 --> 00:56:37.430 align:start position:0%
just endangering everything else
associated<00:56:35.920><c> with</c><00:56:36.079><c> that</c><00:56:36.319><c> issue.</c><00:56:36.880><c> So</c><00:56:37.119><c> I</c><00:56:37.280><c> would</c>

00:56:37.430 --> 00:56:37.440 align:start position:0%
associated with that issue. So I would
 

00:56:37.440 --> 00:56:38.950 align:start position:0%
associated with that issue. So I would
say<00:56:37.599><c> there</c><00:56:37.839><c> are</c><00:56:38.000><c> times</c><00:56:38.319><c> at</c><00:56:38.559><c> which</c><00:56:38.799><c> you</c>

00:56:38.950 --> 00:56:38.960 align:start position:0%
say there are times at which you
 

00:56:38.960 --> 00:56:40.789 align:start position:0%
say there are times at which you
literally<00:56:39.280><c> have</c><00:56:39.440><c> to</c><00:56:39.520><c> triangulate</c><00:56:40.079><c> and</c><00:56:40.319><c> say</c>

00:56:40.789 --> 00:56:40.799 align:start position:0%
literally have to triangulate and say
 

00:56:40.799 --> 00:56:43.109 align:start position:0%
literally have to triangulate and say
no,<00:56:41.839><c> I'm</c><00:56:42.000><c> not</c><00:56:42.160><c> for</c><00:56:42.319><c> that.</c><00:56:42.559><c> That's</c><00:56:42.720><c> what</c><00:56:42.880><c> Rob</c>

00:56:43.109 --> 00:56:43.119 align:start position:0%
no, I'm not for that. That's what Rob
 

00:56:43.119 --> 00:56:45.190 align:start position:0%
no, I'm not for that. That's what Rob
Sand<00:56:43.359><c> did</c><00:56:43.520><c> in</c><00:56:43.680><c> Iowa.</c><00:56:44.160><c> And</c><00:56:44.400><c> that's</c><00:56:44.640><c> also</c><00:56:44.880><c> why</c>

00:56:45.190 --> 00:56:45.200 align:start position:0%
Sand did in Iowa. And that's also why
 

00:56:45.200 --> 00:56:47.990 align:start position:0%
Sand did in Iowa. And that's also why
he's<00:56:46.000><c> um</c><00:56:46.240><c> in</c><00:56:46.480><c> part</c><00:56:46.799><c> really</c><00:56:47.280><c> avoided</c><00:56:47.760><c> being</c>

00:56:47.990 --> 00:56:48.000 align:start position:0%
he's um in part really avoided being
 

00:56:48.000 --> 00:56:49.589 align:start position:0%
he's um in part really avoided being
suckered<00:56:48.319><c> into</c><00:56:48.559><c> the</c><00:56:48.720><c> culture</c><00:56:48.960><c> wars</c><00:56:49.200><c> and</c><00:56:49.359><c> he's</c>

00:56:49.589 --> 00:56:49.599 align:start position:0%
suckered into the culture wars and he's
 

00:56:49.599 --> 00:56:51.430 align:start position:0%
suckered into the culture wars and he's
pulling<00:56:49.920><c> very</c><00:56:50.160><c> very</c><00:56:50.400><c> well</c><00:56:50.640><c> there.</c>

00:56:51.430 --> 00:56:51.440 align:start position:0%
pulling very very well there.
 

00:56:51.440 --> 00:56:54.309 align:start position:0%
pulling very very well there.
&gt;&gt; What<00:56:51.599><c> about</c><00:56:51.760><c> a</c><00:56:52.000><c> presidential</c><00:56:52.480><c> candidate?</c>

00:56:54.309 --> 00:56:54.319 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; What about a presidential candidate?
 

00:56:54.319 --> 00:56:55.349 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; What about a presidential candidate?
&gt;&gt; I'd<00:56:54.559><c> say</c><00:56:54.640><c> the</c><00:56:54.799><c> same</c><00:56:54.960><c> thing</c><00:56:55.040><c> for</c><00:56:55.200><c> a</c>

00:56:55.349 --> 00:56:55.359 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; I'd say the same thing for a
 

00:56:55.359 --> 00:56:56.549 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; I'd say the same thing for a
presidential<00:56:55.760><c> candidate.</c><00:56:56.160><c> You</c><00:56:56.319><c> have</c><00:56:56.400><c> to</c><00:56:56.480><c> win</c>

00:56:56.549 --> 00:56:56.559 align:start position:0%
presidential candidate. You have to win
 

00:56:56.559 --> 00:56:57.670 align:start position:0%
presidential candidate. You have to win
the<00:56:56.720><c> swing</c><00:56:56.960><c> states.</c>

00:56:57.670 --> 00:56:57.680 align:start position:0%
the swing states.
 

00:56:57.680 --> 00:57:00.390 align:start position:0%
the swing states.
&gt;&gt; Oh,<00:56:58.240><c> this</c><00:56:58.480><c> actually</c><00:56:58.880><c> sounds</c><00:56:59.280><c> very,</c><00:56:59.920><c> very</c>

00:57:00.390 --> 00:57:00.400 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; Oh, this actually sounds very, very
 

00:57:00.400 --> 00:57:02.549 align:start position:0%
&gt;&gt; Oh, this actually sounds very, very
different<00:57:00.960><c> from</c><00:57:01.359><c> you</c><00:57:01.599><c> must</c><00:57:01.920><c> accept</c><00:57:02.319><c> trans</c>

00:57:02.549 --> 00:57:02.559 align:start position:0%
different from you must accept trans
 

00:57:02.559 --> 00:57:04.069 align:start position:0%
different from you must accept trans
women<00:57:02.799><c> and</c><00:57:02.960><c> women's</c><00:57:03.280><c> sports</c><00:57:03.680><c> or</c><00:57:03.920><c> we're</c>

00:57:04.069 --> 00:57:04.079 align:start position:0%
women and women's sports or we're
 

00:57:04.079 --> 00:57:05.430 align:start position:0%
women and women's sports or we're
descending<00:57:04.480><c> into</c><00:57:04.720><c> fascism</c><00:57:05.119><c> and</c><00:57:05.280><c> you're</c>

00:57:05.430 --> 00:57:05.440 align:start position:0%
descending into fascism and you're
 

00:57:05.440 --> 00:57:07.510 align:start position:0%
descending into fascism and you're
transphobic.<00:57:06.319><c> In</c><00:57:06.480><c> fact,</c><00:57:06.880><c> it</c><00:57:07.119><c> sounds</c><00:57:07.280><c> like</c>

00:57:07.510 --> 00:57:07.520 align:start position:0%
transphobic. In fact, it sounds like
 

00:57:07.520 --> 00:57:09.430 align:start position:0%
transphobic. In fact, it sounds like
those<00:57:07.760><c> normies</c><00:57:08.240><c> who</c><00:57:08.400><c> are</c><00:57:08.559><c> the</c><00:57:08.799><c> most</c><00:57:08.960><c> likely</c><00:57:09.280><c> to</c>

00:57:09.430 --> 00:57:09.440 align:start position:0%
those normies who are the most likely to
 

00:57:09.440 --> 00:57:11.270 align:start position:0%
those normies who are the most likely to
be<00:57:09.599><c> supportive</c><00:57:10.000><c> of</c><00:57:10.240><c> trans</c><00:57:10.559><c> rights</c><00:57:10.880><c> in</c><00:57:11.040><c> most</c>

00:57:11.270 --> 00:57:11.280 align:start position:0%
be supportive of trans rights in most
 

00:57:11.280 --> 00:57:13.829 align:start position:0%
be supportive of trans rights in most
other<00:57:11.520><c> areas</c><00:57:12.160><c> nonetheless</c><00:57:12.960><c> still</c><00:57:13.280><c> disagree</c>

00:57:13.829 --> 00:57:13.839 align:start position:0%
other areas nonetheless still disagree
 

00:57:13.839 --> 00:57:15.670 align:start position:0%
other areas nonetheless still disagree
with<00:57:14.160><c> trans</c><00:57:14.480><c> women</c><00:57:14.799><c> competing</c><00:57:15.119><c> in</c><00:57:15.359><c> women's</c>

00:57:15.670 --> 00:57:15.680 align:start position:0%
with trans women competing in women's
 

00:57:15.680 --> 00:57:17.589 align:start position:0%
with trans women competing in women's
professional<00:57:16.000><c> sports.</c><00:57:16.720><c> This</c><00:57:16.960><c> point</c><00:57:17.200><c> is</c><00:57:17.359><c> an</c>

00:57:17.589 --> 00:57:17.599 align:start position:0%
professional sports. This point is an
 

00:57:17.599 --> 00:57:19.829 align:start position:0%
professional sports. This point is an
electoral<00:57:18.240><c> loser</c><00:57:18.640><c> and</c><00:57:18.880><c> insisting</c><00:57:19.280><c> upon</c><00:57:19.599><c> it</c>

00:57:19.829 --> 00:57:19.839 align:start position:0%
electoral loser and insisting upon it
 

00:57:19.839 --> 00:57:22.309 align:start position:0%
electoral loser and insisting upon it
has<00:57:20.079><c> made</c><00:57:20.480><c> no</c><00:57:20.880><c> real</c><00:57:21.280><c> world</c><00:57:21.520><c> gains</c><00:57:21.839><c> for</c><00:57:22.000><c> trans</c>

00:57:22.309 --> 00:57:22.319 align:start position:0%
has made no real world gains for trans
 

00:57:22.319 --> 00:57:24.230 align:start position:0%
has made no real world gains for trans
people.<00:57:22.880><c> In</c><00:57:23.119><c> fact,</c><00:57:23.359><c> it's</c><00:57:23.599><c> helped</c><00:57:23.839><c> the</c><00:57:24.000><c> right</c>

00:57:24.230 --> 00:57:24.240 align:start position:0%
people. In fact, it's helped the right
 

00:57:24.240 --> 00:57:26.470 align:start position:0%
people. In fact, it's helped the right
incur<00:57:24.799><c> realworld</c><00:57:25.440><c> losses</c><00:57:25.920><c> against</c><00:57:26.160><c> trans</c>

00:57:26.470 --> 00:57:26.480 align:start position:0%
incur realworld losses against trans
 

00:57:26.480 --> 00:57:28.069 align:start position:0%
incur realworld losses against trans
people<00:57:26.799><c> because</c><00:57:27.040><c> to</c><00:57:27.280><c> the</c><00:57:27.440><c> rest</c><00:57:27.520><c> of</c><00:57:27.599><c> the</c><00:57:27.760><c> world,</c>

00:57:28.069 --> 00:57:28.079 align:start position:0%
people because to the rest of the world,
 

00:57:28.079 --> 00:57:29.510 align:start position:0%
people because to the rest of the world,
you<00:57:28.240><c> look</c><00:57:28.319><c> like</c><00:57:28.480><c> you're</c><00:57:28.640><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:57:28.960><c> delusional.</c>

00:57:29.510 --> 00:57:29.520 align:start position:0%
you look like you're [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] delusional.
 

00:57:29.520 --> 00:57:31.510 align:start position:0%
you look like you're [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] delusional.
And<00:57:29.680><c> like</c><00:57:29.839><c> it</c><00:57:29.920><c> or</c><00:57:30.079><c> not,</c><00:57:30.480><c> trans</c><00:57:30.880><c> people</c><00:57:31.280><c> do</c>

00:57:31.510 --> 00:57:31.520 align:start position:0%
And like it or not, trans people do
 

00:57:31.520 --> 00:57:33.030 align:start position:0%
And like it or not, trans people do
actually<00:57:31.839><c> need</c><00:57:32.000><c> the</c><00:57:32.240><c> rest</c><00:57:32.319><c> of</c><00:57:32.400><c> the</c><00:57:32.559><c> world</c><00:57:32.799><c> on</c>

00:57:33.030 --> 00:57:33.040 align:start position:0%
actually need the rest of the world on
 

00:57:33.040 --> 00:57:35.670 align:start position:0%
actually need the rest of the world on
their<00:57:33.200><c> side.</c><00:57:33.760><c> It</c><00:57:34.079><c> is</c><00:57:34.400><c> my</c><00:57:34.720><c> position,</c><00:57:35.200><c> it</c><00:57:35.440><c> is</c><00:57:35.520><c> the</c>

00:57:35.670 --> 00:57:35.680 align:start position:0%
their side. It is my position, it is the
 

00:57:35.680 --> 00:57:37.510 align:start position:0%
their side. It is my position, it is the
liberals<00:57:36.160><c> that</c><00:57:36.480><c> actually</c><00:57:36.880><c> makes</c><00:57:37.200><c> trans</c>

00:57:37.510 --> 00:57:37.520 align:start position:0%
liberals that actually makes trans
 

00:57:37.520 --> 00:57:39.750 align:start position:0%
liberals that actually makes trans
women's<00:57:37.920><c> lives</c><00:57:38.160><c> better</c><00:57:38.640><c> because</c><00:57:38.880><c> my</c><00:57:39.200><c> position</c>

00:57:39.750 --> 00:57:39.760 align:start position:0%
women's lives better because my position
 

00:57:39.760 --> 00:57:42.309 align:start position:0%
women's lives better because my position
wins<00:57:40.240><c> real</c><00:57:40.640><c> world</c><00:57:40.880><c> elections.</c><00:57:41.680><c> My</c><00:57:41.920><c> position</c>

00:57:42.309 --> 00:57:42.319 align:start position:0%
wins real world elections. My position
 

00:57:42.319 --> 00:57:43.829 align:start position:0%
wins real world elections. My position
puts<00:57:42.640><c> people</c><00:57:42.799><c> into</c><00:57:43.119><c> power,</c><00:57:43.440><c> that</c><00:57:43.599><c> can</c>

00:57:43.829 --> 00:57:43.839 align:start position:0%
puts people into power, that can
 

00:57:43.839 --> 00:57:45.829 align:start position:0%
puts people into power, that can
actually<00:57:44.240><c> pass</c><00:57:44.559><c> legislation</c><00:57:45.200><c> that</c><00:57:45.440><c> protects</c>

00:57:45.829 --> 00:57:45.839 align:start position:0%
actually pass legislation that protects
 

00:57:45.839 --> 00:57:47.430 align:start position:0%
actually pass legislation that protects
people's<00:57:46.240><c> right</c><00:57:46.400><c> to</c><00:57:46.559><c> transition.</c><00:57:47.200><c> My</c>

00:57:47.430 --> 00:57:47.440 align:start position:0%
people's right to transition. My
 

00:57:47.440 --> 00:57:49.430 align:start position:0%
people's right to transition. My
position<00:57:47.760><c> might</c><00:57:47.920><c> not</c><00:57:48.160><c> be</c><00:57:48.319><c> ideologically</c><00:57:49.200><c> pure</c>

00:57:49.430 --> 00:57:49.440 align:start position:0%
position might not be ideologically pure
 

00:57:49.440 --> 00:57:51.589 align:start position:0%
position might not be ideologically pure
like<00:57:49.599><c> Niara's</c><00:57:50.240><c> is</c><00:57:50.480><c> because</c><00:57:50.799><c> I</c><00:57:51.040><c> don't</c><00:57:51.200><c> take</c><00:57:51.359><c> the</c>

00:57:51.589 --> 00:57:51.599 align:start position:0%
like Niara's is because I don't take the
 

00:57:51.599 --> 00:57:53.670 align:start position:0%
like Niara's is because I don't take the
maximally<00:57:52.240><c> protrans</c><00:57:52.880><c> stance</c><00:57:53.200><c> on</c><00:57:53.440><c> every</c>

00:57:53.670 --> 00:57:53.680 align:start position:0%
maximally protrans stance on every
 

00:57:53.680 --> 00:57:55.589 align:start position:0%
maximally protrans stance on every
deranged<00:57:54.240><c> stupid</c><00:57:54.720><c> talking</c><00:57:54.960><c> point</c><00:57:55.200><c> like</c><00:57:55.440><c> she</c>

00:57:55.589 --> 00:57:55.599 align:start position:0%
deranged stupid talking point like she
 

00:57:55.599 --> 00:57:57.430 align:start position:0%
deranged stupid talking point like she
does,<00:57:56.000><c> but</c><00:57:56.160><c> my</c><00:57:56.319><c> position</c><00:57:56.720><c> has</c><00:57:56.880><c> the</c><00:57:57.040><c> advantage</c>

00:57:57.430 --> 00:57:57.440 align:start position:0%
does, but my position has the advantage
 

00:57:57.440 --> 00:58:00.150 align:start position:0%
does, but my position has the advantage
of<00:57:57.760><c> creating</c><00:57:58.240><c> realworld</c><00:57:58.960><c> results.</c><00:57:59.599><c> Nara's</c>

00:58:00.150 --> 00:58:00.160 align:start position:0%
of creating realworld results. Nara's
 

00:58:00.160 --> 00:58:02.150 align:start position:0%
of creating realworld results. Nara's
position<00:58:00.640><c> ultimately</c><00:58:01.119><c> leads</c><00:58:01.359><c> to</c><00:58:01.520><c> her</c><00:58:01.760><c> and</c><00:58:02.000><c> her</c>

00:58:02.150 --> 00:58:02.160 align:start position:0%
position ultimately leads to her and her
 

00:58:02.160 --> 00:58:04.309 align:start position:0%
position ultimately leads to her and her
pack<00:58:02.400><c> of</c><00:58:02.559><c> morons</c><00:58:03.119><c> screaming</c><00:58:03.520><c> on</c><00:58:03.760><c> Twitter</c><00:58:04.079><c> all</c>

00:58:04.309 --> 00:58:04.319 align:start position:0%
pack of morons screaming on Twitter all
 

00:58:04.319 --> 00:58:05.990 align:start position:0%
pack of morons screaming on Twitter all
day<00:58:04.480><c> about</c><00:58:04.720><c> how</c><00:58:04.960><c> everyone</c><00:58:05.280><c> hates</c><00:58:05.520><c> them</c><00:58:05.760><c> and</c>

00:58:05.990 --> 00:58:06.000 align:start position:0%
day about how everyone hates them and
 

00:58:06.000 --> 00:58:07.190 align:start position:0%
day about how everyone hates them and
then<00:58:06.160><c> crying</c><00:58:06.480><c> about</c><00:58:06.640><c> how</c><00:58:06.799><c> they've</c><00:58:07.040><c> been</c>

00:58:07.190 --> 00:58:07.200 align:start position:0%
then crying about how they've been
 

00:58:07.200 --> 00:58:08.950 align:start position:0%
then crying about how they've been
betrayed<00:58:07.680><c> when</c><00:58:08.000><c> all</c><00:58:08.160><c> of</c><00:58:08.240><c> their</c><00:58:08.400><c> rights</c><00:58:08.799><c> get</c>

00:58:08.950 --> 00:58:08.960 align:start position:0%
betrayed when all of their rights get
 

00:58:08.960 --> 00:58:11.190 align:start position:0%
betrayed when all of their rights get
taken<00:58:09.280><c> away</c><00:58:09.599><c> by</c><00:58:09.839><c> people</c><00:58:10.079><c> like</c><00:58:10.240><c> Sargon.</c><00:58:10.960><c> And</c>

00:58:11.190 --> 00:58:11.200 align:start position:0%
taken away by people like Sargon. And
 

00:58:11.200 --> 00:58:13.030 align:start position:0%
taken away by people like Sargon. And
hopefully<00:58:11.680><c> Nara</c><00:58:12.160><c> won't</c><00:58:12.400><c> have</c><00:58:12.480><c> to</c><00:58:12.640><c> take</c><00:58:12.799><c> too</c>

00:58:13.030 --> 00:58:13.040 align:start position:0%
hopefully Nara won't have to take too
 

00:58:13.040 --> 00:58:14.950 align:start position:0%
hopefully Nara won't have to take too
many<00:58:13.200><c> more</c><00:58:13.440><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:58:13.839><c> L's</c><00:58:14.240><c> before</c><00:58:14.480><c> she</c><00:58:14.720><c> figures</c>

00:58:14.950 --> 00:58:14.960 align:start position:0%
many more [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] L's before she figures
 

00:58:14.960 --> 00:58:17.030 align:start position:0%
many more [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] L's before she figures
out<00:58:15.119><c> that</c><00:58:15.359><c> people</c><00:58:15.520><c> like</c><00:58:15.680><c> her</c><00:58:16.079><c> only</c><00:58:16.400><c> embolden</c>

00:58:17.030 --> 00:58:17.040 align:start position:0%
out that people like her only embolden
 

00:58:17.040 --> 00:58:19.270 align:start position:0%
out that people like her only embolden
the<00:58:17.200><c> rights</c><00:58:17.599><c> attacks</c><00:58:18.000><c> against</c><00:58:18.400><c> trans</c><00:58:18.720><c> people.</c>

00:58:19.270 --> 00:58:19.280 align:start position:0%
the rights attacks against trans people.
 

00:58:19.280 --> 00:58:21.109 align:start position:0%
the rights attacks against trans people.
That<00:58:19.520><c> is</c><00:58:19.680><c> what</c><00:58:19.839><c> Laksha's</c><00:58:20.400><c> polling</c><00:58:20.720><c> data</c>

00:58:21.109 --> 00:58:21.119 align:start position:0%
That is what Laksha's polling data
 

00:58:21.119 --> 00:58:23.190 align:start position:0%
That is what Laksha's polling data
actually<00:58:21.440><c> means.</c><00:58:21.920><c> The</c><00:58:22.079><c> normies</c><00:58:22.640><c> view</c><00:58:22.880><c> trans</c>

00:58:23.190 --> 00:58:23.200 align:start position:0%
actually means. The normies view trans
 

00:58:23.200 --> 00:58:25.190 align:start position:0%
actually means. The normies view trans
women<00:58:23.440><c> in</c><00:58:23.680><c> women's</c><00:58:24.079><c> sports</c><00:58:24.400><c> as</c><00:58:24.640><c> such</c><00:58:24.799><c> a</c><00:58:24.960><c> hard</c>

00:58:25.190 --> 00:58:25.200 align:start position:0%
women in women's sports as such a hard
 

00:58:25.200 --> 00:58:26.789 align:start position:0%
women in women's sports as such a hard
line<00:58:25.440><c> for</c><00:58:25.599><c> them</c><00:58:25.760><c> that</c><00:58:26.000><c> they</c><00:58:26.160><c> will</c><00:58:26.319><c> vote</c><00:58:26.480><c> for</c><00:58:26.640><c> a</c>

00:58:26.789 --> 00:58:26.799 align:start position:0%
line for them that they will vote for a
 

00:58:26.799 --> 00:58:28.630 align:start position:0%
line for them that they will vote for a
right-winger<00:58:27.280><c> who</c><00:58:27.440><c> would</c><00:58:27.520><c> abolish</c><00:58:28.000><c> all</c><00:58:28.319><c> trans</c>

00:58:28.630 --> 00:58:28.640 align:start position:0%
right-winger who would abolish all trans
 

00:58:28.640 --> 00:58:31.270 align:start position:0%
right-winger who would abolish all trans
rights.<00:58:29.280><c> But</c><00:58:29.599><c> if</c><00:58:29.920><c> there</c><00:58:30.160><c> was</c><00:58:30.400><c> a</c><00:58:30.720><c> reasonable</c>

00:58:31.270 --> 00:58:31.280 align:start position:0%
rights. But if there was a reasonable
 

00:58:31.280 --> 00:58:33.109 align:start position:0%
rights. But if there was a reasonable
centrist<00:58:31.839><c> candidate</c><00:58:32.240><c> who</c><00:58:32.480><c> didn't</c><00:58:32.799><c> accept</c>

00:58:33.109 --> 00:58:33.119 align:start position:0%
centrist candidate who didn't accept
 

00:58:33.119 --> 00:58:34.870 align:start position:0%
centrist candidate who didn't accept
trans<00:58:33.359><c> women</c><00:58:33.520><c> and</c><00:58:33.680><c> women</c><00:58:33.920><c> sports,</c><00:58:34.319><c> but</c><00:58:34.559><c> who</c>

00:58:34.870 --> 00:58:34.880 align:start position:0%
trans women and women sports, but who
 

00:58:34.880 --> 00:58:37.349 align:start position:0%
trans women and women sports, but who
also<00:58:35.200><c> didn't</c><00:58:35.520><c> agree</c><00:58:36.000><c> with</c><00:58:36.240><c> every</c><00:58:36.720><c> maximally</c>

00:58:37.349 --> 00:58:37.359 align:start position:0%
also didn't agree with every maximally
 

00:58:37.359 --> 00:58:39.190 align:start position:0%
also didn't agree with every maximally
anti-trans<00:58:38.160><c> stance</c><00:58:38.400><c> the</c><00:58:38.559><c> way</c><00:58:38.640><c> the</c><00:58:38.799><c> right-wing</c>

00:58:39.190 --> 00:58:39.200 align:start position:0%
anti-trans stance the way the right-wing
 

00:58:39.200 --> 00:58:41.430 align:start position:0%
anti-trans stance the way the right-wing
does,<00:58:39.599><c> well,</c><00:58:39.920><c> that</c><00:58:40.160><c> guy</c><00:58:40.400><c> wins</c><00:58:40.640><c> elections.</c>

00:58:41.430 --> 00:58:41.440 align:start position:0%
does, well, that guy wins elections.
 

00:58:41.440 --> 00:58:43.430 align:start position:0%
does, well, that guy wins elections.
That<00:58:41.760><c> is</c><00:58:41.839><c> what</c><00:58:42.079><c> people</c><00:58:42.400><c> actually</c><00:58:42.720><c> want.</c><00:58:43.200><c> The</c>

00:58:43.430 --> 00:58:43.440 align:start position:0%
That is what people actually want. The
 

00:58:43.440 --> 00:58:45.670 align:start position:0%
That is what people actually want. The
only<00:58:43.680><c> reason</c><00:58:44.000><c> this</c><00:58:44.319><c> dialectic</c><00:58:45.040><c> collapses,</c><00:58:45.520><c> as</c>

00:58:45.670 --> 00:58:45.680 align:start position:0%
only reason this dialectic collapses, as
 

00:58:45.680 --> 00:58:47.589 align:start position:0%
only reason this dialectic collapses, as
Sargon<00:58:46.160><c> put</c><00:58:46.319><c> it,</c><00:58:46.559><c> is</c><00:58:46.720><c> because</c><00:58:46.960><c> the</c><00:58:47.200><c> trans</c>

00:58:47.589 --> 00:58:47.599 align:start position:0%
Sargon put it, is because the trans
 

00:58:47.599 --> 00:58:49.910 align:start position:0%
Sargon put it, is because the trans
activists<00:58:48.160><c> force</c><00:58:48.480><c> it</c><00:58:48.720><c> to</c><00:58:48.880><c> collapse.</c><00:58:49.440><c> And</c><00:58:49.680><c> that</c>

00:58:49.910 --> 00:58:49.920 align:start position:0%
activists force it to collapse. And that
 

00:58:49.920 --> 00:58:51.910 align:start position:0%
activists force it to collapse. And that
is<00:58:50.160><c> basically</c><00:58:50.640><c> the</c><00:58:50.880><c> death</c><00:58:51.200><c> nail</c><00:58:51.440><c> for</c><00:58:51.599><c> trans</c>

00:58:51.910 --> 00:58:51.920 align:start position:0%
is basically the death nail for trans
 

00:58:51.920 --> 00:58:53.750 align:start position:0%
is basically the death nail for trans
people<00:58:52.400><c> because</c><00:58:52.799><c> recent</c><00:58:53.200><c> political</c><00:58:53.520><c> history</c>

00:58:53.750 --> 00:58:53.760 align:start position:0%
people because recent political history
 

00:58:53.760 --> 00:58:55.109 align:start position:0%
people because recent political history
has<00:58:54.000><c> shown</c><00:58:54.240><c> they're</c><00:58:54.480><c> not</c><00:58:54.640><c> going</c><00:58:54.720><c> to</c><00:58:54.799><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c>

00:58:55.109 --> 00:58:55.119 align:start position:0%
has shown they're not going to [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]
 

00:58:55.119 --> 00:58:56.710 align:start position:0%
has shown they're not going to [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]
survive<00:58:55.359><c> that</c><00:58:55.599><c> collapse.</c><00:58:56.079><c> But</c><00:58:56.319><c> don't</c><00:58:56.480><c> worry,</c>

00:58:56.710 --> 00:58:56.720 align:start position:0%
survive that collapse. But don't worry,
 

00:58:56.720 --> 00:58:59.030 align:start position:0%
survive that collapse. But don't worry,
Nara.<00:58:57.280><c> It</c><00:58:57.520><c> will</c><00:58:57.680><c> be</c><00:58:57.920><c> those</c><00:58:58.240><c> pesky</c><00:58:58.640><c> liberals</c>

00:58:59.030 --> 00:58:59.040 align:start position:0%
Nara. It will be those pesky liberals
 

00:58:59.040 --> 00:59:01.109 align:start position:0%
Nara. It will be those pesky liberals
you<00:58:59.200><c> hate</c><00:58:59.440><c> who</c><00:58:59.760><c> ride</c><00:59:00.000><c> in</c><00:59:00.319><c> and</c><00:59:00.559><c> save</c><00:59:00.880><c> your</c>

00:59:01.109 --> 00:59:01.119 align:start position:0%
you hate who ride in and save your
 

00:59:01.119 --> 00:59:02.870 align:start position:0%
you hate who ride in and save your
dumbass<00:59:01.520><c> once</c><00:59:01.839><c> again</c><00:59:02.000><c> like</c><00:59:02.160><c> we</c><00:59:02.400><c> always</c><00:59:02.559><c> do,</c>

00:59:02.870 --> 00:59:02.880 align:start position:0%
dumbass once again like we always do,
 

00:59:02.880 --> 00:59:04.470 align:start position:0%
dumbass once again like we always do,
even<00:59:03.119><c> if</c><00:59:03.280><c> you</c><00:59:03.440><c> don't</c><00:59:03.599><c> actually</c><00:59:03.760><c> deserve</c><00:59:04.079><c> it.</c>

00:59:04.470 --> 00:59:04.480 align:start position:0%
even if you don't actually deserve it.
 

00:59:04.480 --> 00:59:06.870 align:start position:0%
even if you don't actually deserve it.
Despite<00:59:04.799><c> what</c><00:59:04.960><c> Sargon</c><00:59:05.520><c> thinks,</c><00:59:05.920><c> the</c><00:59:06.079><c> libs</c><00:59:06.559><c> are</c>

00:59:06.870 --> 00:59:06.880 align:start position:0%
Despite what Sargon thinks, the libs are
 

00:59:06.880 --> 00:59:08.549 align:start position:0%
Despite what Sargon thinks, the libs are
actually<00:59:07.119><c> going</c><00:59:07.280><c> to</c><00:59:07.359><c> win</c><00:59:07.520><c> this</c><00:59:07.680><c> one,</c><00:59:07.839><c> Nara.</c>

00:59:08.549 --> 00:59:08.559 align:start position:0%
actually going to win this one, Nara.
 

00:59:08.559 --> 00:59:09.670 align:start position:0%
actually going to win this one, Nara.
You<00:59:08.720><c> are</c><00:59:08.880><c> going</c><00:59:09.040><c> to</c><00:59:09.119><c> get</c><00:59:09.200><c> the</c><00:59:09.359><c> right</c><00:59:09.520><c> to</c>

00:59:09.670 --> 00:59:09.680 align:start position:0%
You are going to get the right to
 

00:59:09.680 --> 00:59:11.270 align:start position:0%
You are going to get the right to
transition<00:59:10.000><c> enshrined</c><00:59:10.400><c> in</c><00:59:10.559><c> law.</c><00:59:10.960><c> You</c><00:59:11.119><c> are</c>

00:59:11.270 --> 00:59:11.280 align:start position:0%
transition enshrined in law. You are
 

00:59:11.280 --> 00:59:12.470 align:start position:0%
transition enshrined in law. You are
going<00:59:11.359><c> to</c><00:59:11.440><c> get</c><00:59:11.520><c> your</c><00:59:11.680><c> anti-discrimination</c>

00:59:12.470 --> 00:59:12.480 align:start position:0%
going to get your anti-discrimination
 

00:59:12.480 --> 00:59:14.230 align:start position:0%
going to get your anti-discrimination
laws,<00:59:12.799><c> too.</c><00:59:13.200><c> You</c><00:59:13.359><c> are</c><00:59:13.599><c> going</c><00:59:13.680><c> to</c><00:59:13.760><c> get</c><00:59:13.920><c> banned</c>

00:59:14.230 --> 00:59:14.240 align:start position:0%
laws, too. You are going to get banned
 

00:59:14.240 --> 00:59:15.670 align:start position:0%
laws, too. You are going to get banned
from<00:59:14.400><c> women's</c><00:59:14.720><c> professional</c><00:59:15.040><c> sports.</c><00:59:15.520><c> And</c>

00:59:15.670 --> 00:59:15.680 align:start position:0%
from women's professional sports. And
 

00:59:15.680 --> 00:59:17.109 align:start position:0%
from women's professional sports. And
even<00:59:15.839><c> if</c><00:59:16.079><c> you</c><00:59:16.160><c> don't</c><00:59:16.319><c> have</c><00:59:16.480><c> the</c><00:59:16.640><c> intelligence</c>

00:59:17.109 --> 00:59:17.119 align:start position:0%
even if you don't have the intelligence
 

00:59:17.119 --> 00:59:18.549 align:start position:0%
even if you don't have the intelligence
or<00:59:17.280><c> the</c><00:59:17.440><c> humility</c><00:59:17.839><c> enough</c><00:59:18.000><c> to</c><00:59:18.160><c> thank</c><00:59:18.319><c> us</c><00:59:18.400><c> for</c>

00:59:18.549 --> 00:59:18.559 align:start position:0%
or the humility enough to thank us for
 

00:59:18.559 --> 00:59:20.150 align:start position:0%
or the humility enough to thank us for
it,<00:59:18.880><c> you're</c><00:59:19.040><c> still</c><00:59:19.200><c> going</c><00:59:19.359><c> to</c><00:59:19.520><c> enjoy</c><00:59:19.760><c> it.</c>

00:59:20.150 --> 00:59:20.160 align:start position:0%
it, you're still going to enjoy it.
 

00:59:20.160 --> 00:59:21.990 align:start position:0%
it, you're still going to enjoy it.
You're<00:59:20.480><c> welcome.</c><00:59:20.960><c> You</c><00:59:21.200><c> can</c><00:59:21.359><c> either</c><00:59:21.599><c> get</c><00:59:21.839><c> with</c>

00:59:21.990 --> 00:59:22.000 align:start position:0%
You're welcome. You can either get with
 

00:59:22.000 --> 00:59:24.390 align:start position:0%
You're welcome. You can either get with
the<00:59:22.240><c> program</c><00:59:22.559><c> or</c><00:59:22.880><c> keep</c><00:59:23.200><c> pouring</c><00:59:23.599><c> gasoline</c><00:59:24.160><c> all</c>

00:59:24.390 --> 00:59:24.400 align:start position:0%
the program or keep pouring gasoline all
 

00:59:24.400 --> 00:59:26.230 align:start position:0%
the program or keep pouring gasoline all
over<00:59:24.640><c> yourself.</c><00:59:25.280><c> Because</c><00:59:25.440><c> if</c><00:59:25.599><c> you</c><00:59:25.760><c> ever</c><00:59:26.000><c> light</c>

00:59:26.230 --> 00:59:26.240 align:start position:0%
over yourself. Because if you ever light
 

00:59:26.240 --> 00:59:27.910 align:start position:0%
over yourself. Because if you ever light
on<00:59:26.480><c> fire,</c><00:59:26.880><c> it's</c><00:59:27.040><c> not</c><00:59:27.200><c> going</c><00:59:27.280><c> to</c><00:59:27.359><c> be</c><00:59:27.520><c> me</c><00:59:27.760><c> who</c>

00:59:27.910 --> 00:59:27.920 align:start position:0%
on fire, it's not going to be me who
 

00:59:27.920 --> 00:59:30.240 align:start position:0%
on fire, it's not going to be me who
burns.

