WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.880 --> 00:00:03.990 align:start position:0%
 
Hey<00:00:01.199><c> guys,</c><00:00:01.439><c> it's</c><00:00:01.600><c> your</c><00:00:01.760><c> boy</c><00:00:02.000><c> Zach.</c>

00:00:03.990 --> 00:00:04.000 align:start position:0%
Hey guys, it's your boy Zach.
 

00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:07.430 align:start position:0%
Hey guys, it's your boy Zach.
Um,<00:00:04.880><c> I</c><00:00:05.200><c> am</c><00:00:05.520><c> hanging</c><00:00:05.839><c> out</c><00:00:06.240><c> by</c><00:00:06.480><c> a</c><00:00:06.720><c> river</c><00:00:06.960><c> again.</c>

00:00:07.430 --> 00:00:07.440 align:start position:0%
Um, I am hanging out by a river again.
 

00:00:07.440 --> 00:00:09.910 align:start position:0%
Um, I am hanging out by a river again.
As<00:00:07.600><c> you</c><00:00:07.759><c> can</c><00:00:07.919><c> see,</c><00:00:08.960><c> I</c><00:00:09.200><c> had</c><00:00:09.360><c> to</c><00:00:09.519><c> wait</c><00:00:09.679><c> for</c><00:00:09.760><c> a</c>

00:00:09.910 --> 00:00:09.920 align:start position:0%
As you can see, I had to wait for a
 

00:00:09.920 --> 00:00:12.709 align:start position:0%
As you can see, I had to wait for a
freight<00:00:10.240><c> train</c><00:00:10.480><c> to</c><00:00:10.639><c> pass.</c><00:00:11.280><c> There's</c><00:00:11.519><c> a</c><00:00:12.480><c> train</c>

00:00:12.709 --> 00:00:12.719 align:start position:0%
freight train to pass. There's a train
 

00:00:12.719 --> 00:00:14.310 align:start position:0%
freight train to pass. There's a train
that<00:00:12.880><c> passes</c><00:00:13.280><c> on</c><00:00:13.440><c> the</c><00:00:13.519><c> other</c><00:00:13.679><c> side</c><00:00:13.840><c> there</c><00:00:14.080><c> a</c>

00:00:14.310 --> 00:00:14.320 align:start position:0%
that passes on the other side there a
 

00:00:14.320 --> 00:00:16.230 align:start position:0%
that passes on the other side there a
lot.

00:00:16.230 --> 00:00:16.240 align:start position:0%
lot.
 

00:00:16.240 --> 00:00:19.349 align:start position:0%
lot.
Um,<00:00:17.119><c> but</c><00:00:17.359><c> you'll</c><00:00:17.680><c> still</c><00:00:17.840><c> hear</c><00:00:18.720><c> construction</c>

00:00:19.349 --> 00:00:19.359 align:start position:0%
Um, but you'll still hear construction
 

00:00:19.359 --> 00:00:23.189 align:start position:0%
Um, but you'll still hear construction
noises<00:00:19.920><c> and</c><00:00:21.359><c> the</c><00:00:21.680><c> geese</c><00:00:22.320><c> probably</c><00:00:22.960><c> cuz</c>

00:00:23.189 --> 00:00:23.199 align:start position:0%
noises and the geese probably cuz
 

00:00:23.199 --> 00:00:25.349 align:start position:0%
noises and the geese probably cuz
they're<00:00:23.439><c> hanging</c><00:00:23.680><c> out</c><00:00:23.920><c> down</c><00:00:24.160><c> there.</c>

00:00:25.349 --> 00:00:25.359 align:start position:0%
they're hanging out down there.
 

00:00:25.359 --> 00:00:27.670 align:start position:0%
they're hanging out down there.
Um,

00:00:27.670 --> 00:00:27.680 align:start position:0%
Um,
 

00:00:27.680 --> 00:00:31.349 align:start position:0%
Um,
so,<00:00:29.119><c> uh,</c><00:00:29.439><c> yeah,</c><00:00:29.840><c> Bun</c><00:00:30.400><c> merged</c><00:00:30.880><c> their</c><00:00:31.119><c> big</c>

00:00:31.349 --> 00:00:31.359 align:start position:0%
so, uh, yeah, Bun merged their big
 

00:00:31.359 --> 00:00:36.150 align:start position:0%
so, uh, yeah, Bun merged their big
rewrite<00:00:32.640><c> today</c><00:00:33.520><c> from</c><00:00:33.760><c> Zigg</c><00:00:34.079><c> to</c><00:00:34.320><c> Rust.</c><00:00:35.760><c> And</c><00:00:35.920><c> I</c>

00:00:36.150 --> 00:00:36.160 align:start position:0%
rewrite today from Zigg to Rust. And I
 

00:00:36.160 --> 00:00:38.229 align:start position:0%
rewrite today from Zigg to Rust. And I
realized<00:00:36.480><c> this</c><00:00:36.719><c> is</c><00:00:36.880><c> a</c><00:00:37.120><c> bigger</c><00:00:37.520><c> story</c><00:00:37.760><c> than</c><00:00:38.000><c> I</c>

00:00:38.229 --> 00:00:38.239 align:start position:0%
realized this is a bigger story than I
 

00:00:38.239 --> 00:00:40.389 align:start position:0%
realized this is a bigger story than I
thought<00:00:38.320><c> it</c><00:00:38.559><c> was.</c><00:00:39.040><c> This</c><00:00:39.280><c> is,</c><00:00:39.600><c> I</c><00:00:39.920><c> think,</c><00:00:40.160><c> the</c>

00:00:40.389 --> 00:00:40.399 align:start position:0%
thought it was. This is, I think, the
 

00:00:40.399 --> 00:00:41.910 align:start position:0%
thought it was. This is, I think, the
first

00:00:41.910 --> 00:00:41.920 align:start position:0%
first
 

00:00:41.920 --> 00:00:44.389 align:start position:0%
first
really<00:00:42.320><c> public</c><00:00:42.719><c> example</c><00:00:43.200><c> we</c><00:00:43.440><c> have</c><00:00:43.600><c> of</c><00:00:43.840><c> a</c><00:00:44.079><c> large</c>

00:00:44.389 --> 00:00:44.399 align:start position:0%
really public example we have of a large
 

00:00:44.399 --> 00:00:46.790 align:start position:0%
really public example we have of a large
scale<00:00:45.040><c> software</c><00:00:45.520><c> project</c><00:00:46.160><c> completely</c>

00:00:46.790 --> 00:00:46.800 align:start position:0%
scale software project completely
 

00:00:46.800 --> 00:00:48.310 align:start position:0%
scale software project completely
transitioning

00:00:48.310 --> 00:00:48.320 align:start position:0%
transitioning
 

00:00:48.320 --> 00:00:52.150 align:start position:0%
transitioning
to<00:00:49.760><c> agentic</c><00:00:50.320><c> coding.</c>

00:00:52.150 --> 00:00:52.160 align:start position:0%
to agentic coding.
 

00:00:52.160 --> 00:00:54.069 align:start position:0%
to agentic coding.
you<00:00:52.399><c> know</c><00:00:52.559><c> the</c><00:00:52.719><c> the</c><00:00:52.879><c> the</c><00:00:53.520><c> initially</c><00:00:53.920><c> they</c>

00:00:54.069 --> 00:00:54.079 align:start position:0%
you know the the the initially they
 

00:00:54.079 --> 00:00:56.389 align:start position:0%
you know the the the initially they
wrote<00:00:54.239><c> it</c><00:00:54.399><c> in</c><00:00:54.559><c> Zigg</c><00:00:54.879><c> and</c><00:00:55.520><c> and</c><00:00:55.920><c> of</c><00:00:56.079><c> course</c><00:00:56.239><c> in</c>

00:00:56.389 --> 00:00:56.399 align:start position:0%
wrote it in Zigg and and of course in
 

00:00:56.399 --> 00:00:58.869 align:start position:0%
wrote it in Zigg and and of course in
the<00:00:56.559><c> early</c><00:00:56.800><c> days</c><00:00:57.039><c> it</c><00:00:57.199><c> was</c><00:00:57.360><c> handwritten</c><00:00:58.559><c> they</c>

00:00:58.869 --> 00:00:58.879 align:start position:0%
the early days it was handwritten they
 

00:00:58.879 --> 00:01:02.869 align:start position:0%
the early days it was handwritten they
started<00:01:00.000><c> using</c><00:01:00.480><c> Claude</c><00:01:00.960><c> extensively</c>

00:01:02.869 --> 00:01:02.879 align:start position:0%
started using Claude extensively
 

00:01:02.879 --> 00:01:05.429 align:start position:0%
started using Claude extensively
uh<00:01:03.039><c> the</c><00:01:03.280><c> last</c><00:01:03.440><c> couple</c><00:01:03.680><c> years</c><00:01:04.000><c> and</c><00:01:04.239><c> now</c><00:01:05.199><c> with</c>

00:01:05.429 --> 00:01:05.439 align:start position:0%
uh the last couple years and now with
 

00:01:05.439 --> 00:01:07.350 align:start position:0%
uh the last couple years and now with
this<00:01:05.680><c> rewrite</c><00:01:06.159><c> to</c><00:01:06.320><c> Rust</c><00:01:06.640><c> it's</c><00:01:06.880><c> completely</c>

00:01:07.350 --> 00:01:07.360 align:start position:0%
this rewrite to Rust it's completely
 

00:01:07.360 --> 00:01:10.070 align:start position:0%
this rewrite to Rust it's completely
written<00:01:07.600><c> by</c><00:01:07.920><c> Claude</c><00:01:09.200><c> and</c><00:01:09.360><c> I</c><00:01:09.520><c> realized</c><00:01:09.840><c> this</c><00:01:10.000><c> is</c>

00:01:10.070 --> 00:01:10.080 align:start position:0%
written by Claude and I realized this is
 

00:01:10.080 --> 00:01:14.070 align:start position:0%
written by Claude and I realized this is
actually<00:01:10.240><c> a</c><00:01:10.400><c> big</c><00:01:10.560><c> risk</c><00:01:11.920><c> because</c><00:01:12.479><c> if</c><00:01:12.799><c> this</c>

00:01:14.070 --> 00:01:14.080 align:start position:0%
actually a big risk because if this
 

00:01:14.080 --> 00:01:17.270 align:start position:0%
actually a big risk because if this
fails<00:01:14.640><c> and</c><00:01:14.799><c> and</c><00:01:15.200><c> the</c><00:01:15.360><c> the</c><00:01:15.680><c> project</c><00:01:16.000><c> becomes</c>

00:01:17.270 --> 00:01:17.280 align:start position:0%
fails and and the the project becomes
 

00:01:17.280 --> 00:01:20.950 align:start position:0%
fails and and the the project becomes
too<00:01:17.680><c> complex</c><00:01:18.960><c> for</c><00:01:19.200><c> Claude</c><00:01:19.680><c> to</c><00:01:20.320><c> continue</c><00:01:20.640><c> to</c>

00:01:20.950 --> 00:01:20.960 align:start position:0%
too complex for Claude to continue to
 

00:01:20.960 --> 00:01:24.070 align:start position:0%
too complex for Claude to continue to
maintain

00:01:24.070 --> 00:01:24.080 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:01:24.080 --> 00:01:26.469 align:start position:0%
 
This<00:01:24.320><c> could</c><00:01:24.560><c> be</c><00:01:24.640><c> a</c><00:01:24.799><c> PR</c><00:01:25.200><c> disaster</c><00:01:25.920><c> not</c><00:01:26.159><c> just</c><00:01:26.240><c> for</c>

00:01:26.469 --> 00:01:26.479 align:start position:0%
This could be a PR disaster not just for
 

00:01:26.479 --> 00:01:29.270 align:start position:0%
This could be a PR disaster not just for
Anthropic<00:01:27.119><c> but</c><00:01:27.439><c> even</c><00:01:27.759><c> for</c>

00:01:29.270 --> 00:01:29.280 align:start position:0%
Anthropic but even for
 

00:01:29.280 --> 00:01:32.630 align:start position:0%
Anthropic but even for
all<00:01:29.840><c> frontier</c><00:01:30.400><c> AI</c><00:01:30.960><c> companies.</c><00:01:32.079><c> Remember</c><00:01:32.400><c> they</c>

00:01:32.630 --> 00:01:32.640 align:start position:0%
all frontier AI companies. Remember they
 

00:01:32.640 --> 00:01:35.910 align:start position:0%
all frontier AI companies. Remember they
all<00:01:32.880><c> pretty</c><00:01:33.119><c> much</c><00:01:33.759><c> pivoted</c><00:01:34.320><c> to</c><00:01:34.560><c> focus</c><00:01:34.880><c> on</c><00:01:35.520><c> on</c>

00:01:35.910 --> 00:01:35.920 align:start position:0%
all pretty much pivoted to focus on on
 

00:01:35.920 --> 00:01:39.910 align:start position:0%
all pretty much pivoted to focus on on
coding<00:01:37.360><c> the</c><00:01:37.600><c> last</c><00:01:37.920><c> year</c><00:01:38.159><c> or</c><00:01:38.479><c> two</c><00:01:39.119><c> because</c><00:01:39.439><c> they</c>

00:01:39.910 --> 00:01:39.920 align:start position:0%
coding the last year or two because they
 

00:01:39.920 --> 00:01:41.749 align:start position:0%
coding the last year or two because they
collectively<00:01:40.560><c> realized</c><00:01:41.119><c> this</c><00:01:41.280><c> is</c><00:01:41.439><c> where</c><00:01:41.600><c> the</c>

00:01:41.749 --> 00:01:41.759 align:start position:0%
collectively realized this is where the
 

00:01:41.759 --> 00:01:44.069 align:start position:0%
collectively realized this is where the
money<00:01:42.000><c> is,</c><00:01:42.560><c> right?</c><00:01:43.280><c> The</c><00:01:43.520><c> money</c><00:01:43.680><c> is</c><00:01:43.920><c> not</c>

00:01:44.069 --> 00:01:44.079 align:start position:0%
money is, right? The money is not
 

00:01:44.079 --> 00:01:46.950 align:start position:0%
money is, right? The money is not
getting<00:01:44.320><c> normies</c><00:01:44.799><c> to</c><00:01:44.960><c> pay</c><00:01:45.119><c> 10</c><00:01:45.360><c> bucks</c><00:01:45.600><c> a</c><00:01:45.759><c> month.</c>

00:01:46.950 --> 00:01:46.960 align:start position:0%
getting normies to pay 10 bucks a month.
 

00:01:46.960 --> 00:01:49.830 align:start position:0%
getting normies to pay 10 bucks a month.
The<00:01:47.280><c> money</c><00:01:47.439><c> is</c><00:01:47.759><c> in</c><00:01:48.479><c> getting</c><00:01:48.799><c> highly</c><00:01:49.200><c> paid</c>

00:01:49.830 --> 00:01:49.840 align:start position:0%
The money is in getting highly paid
 

00:01:49.840 --> 00:01:53.109 align:start position:0%
The money is in getting highly paid
programmers<00:01:50.479><c> to</c><00:01:50.799><c> pay</c><00:01:51.439><c> $200</c><00:01:52.000><c> a</c><00:01:52.240><c> month,</c><00:01:52.799><c> getting</c>

00:01:53.109 --> 00:01:53.119 align:start position:0%
programmers to pay $200 a month, getting
 

00:01:53.119 --> 00:01:55.910 align:start position:0%
programmers to pay $200 a month, getting
software<00:01:53.600><c> companies</c><00:01:54.000><c> to</c><00:01:54.159><c> pay</c><00:01:54.399><c> per</c><00:01:54.640><c> seat,</c><00:01:55.600><c> and</c>

00:01:55.910 --> 00:01:55.920 align:start position:0%
software companies to pay per seat, and
 

00:01:55.920 --> 00:01:58.230 align:start position:0%
software companies to pay per seat, and
of<00:01:56.079><c> course</c><00:01:56.320><c> paying</c><00:01:56.640><c> even</c><00:01:56.960><c> more</c><00:01:57.280><c> for</c><00:01:57.680><c> API</c>

00:01:58.230 --> 00:01:58.240 align:start position:0%
of course paying even more for API
 

00:01:58.240 --> 00:02:00.550 align:start position:0%
of course paying even more for API
usage.

00:02:00.550 --> 00:02:00.560 align:start position:0%
usage.
 

00:02:00.560 --> 00:02:02.870 align:start position:0%
usage.
And<00:02:00.960><c> so</c><00:02:01.200><c> what</c><00:02:01.439><c> happens</c><00:02:01.600><c> if</c><00:02:01.840><c> a</c><00:02:02.159><c> big</c><00:02:02.479><c> project</c>

00:02:02.870 --> 00:02:02.880 align:start position:0%
And so what happens if a big project
 

00:02:02.880 --> 00:02:05.990 align:start position:0%
And so what happens if a big project
like<00:02:03.200><c> this</c><00:02:04.479><c> cuz</c><00:02:04.719><c> because</c><00:02:04.960><c> with</c><00:02:05.200><c> bun</c><00:02:05.600><c> this</c><00:02:05.759><c> is</c>

00:02:05.990 --> 00:02:06.000 align:start position:0%
like this cuz because with bun this is
 

00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:09.029 align:start position:0%
like this cuz because with bun this is
like<00:02:06.399><c> best</c><00:02:06.719><c> case</c><00:02:06.960><c> scenario</c><00:02:07.439><c> for</c>

00:02:09.029 --> 00:02:09.039 align:start position:0%
like best case scenario for
 

00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:11.110 align:start position:0%
like best case scenario for
agentic<00:02:09.599><c> coding,</c><00:02:10.080><c> right?</c><00:02:10.560><c> They</c><00:02:10.800><c> have</c><00:02:10.879><c> an</c>

00:02:11.110 --> 00:02:11.120 align:start position:0%
agentic coding, right? They have an
 

00:02:11.120 --> 00:02:13.430 align:start position:0%
agentic coding, right? They have an
unlimited<00:02:11.520><c> token</c><00:02:12.000><c> budget</c><00:02:12.400><c> because</c><00:02:12.720><c> they</c><00:02:13.200><c> of</c>

00:02:13.430 --> 00:02:13.440 align:start position:0%
unlimited token budget because they of
 

00:02:13.440 --> 00:02:15.990 align:start position:0%
unlimited token budget because they of
course<00:02:13.680><c> work</c><00:02:13.840><c> for</c><00:02:14.080><c> Anthropic</c><00:02:15.440><c> and</c><00:02:15.680><c> they</c><00:02:15.920><c> have</c>

00:02:15.990 --> 00:02:16.000 align:start position:0%
course work for Anthropic and they have
 

00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:18.470 align:start position:0%
course work for Anthropic and they have
an<00:02:16.160><c> unlimited</c><00:02:16.560><c> human</c><00:02:16.879><c> budget</c><00:02:17.599><c> because</c><00:02:18.239><c> they</c>

00:02:18.470 --> 00:02:18.480 align:start position:0%
an unlimited human budget because they
 

00:02:18.480 --> 00:02:22.150 align:start position:0%
an unlimited human budget because they
they<00:02:19.360><c> they</c><00:02:19.760><c> can</c><00:02:19.920><c> hire</c><00:02:20.319><c> the</c><00:02:20.720><c> best</c><00:02:21.680><c> programmers</c>

00:02:22.150 --> 00:02:22.160 align:start position:0%
they they can hire the best programmers
 

00:02:22.160 --> 00:02:25.110 align:start position:0%
they they can hire the best programmers
that<00:02:22.400><c> money</c><00:02:22.640><c> can</c><00:02:22.879><c> buy.</c><00:02:24.080><c> Um</c><00:02:24.560><c> they're</c><00:02:24.879><c> paying</c>

00:02:25.110 --> 00:02:25.120 align:start position:0%
that money can buy. Um they're paying
 

00:02:25.120 --> 00:02:27.430 align:start position:0%
that money can buy. Um they're paying
Silicon<00:02:25.599><c> Valley</c><00:02:26.000><c> salaries,</c><00:02:26.800><c> right?</c><00:02:27.280><c> They</c>

00:02:27.430 --> 00:02:27.440 align:start position:0%
Silicon Valley salaries, right? They
 

00:02:27.440 --> 00:02:28.949 align:start position:0%
Silicon Valley salaries, right? They
they're<00:02:27.680><c> hiring</c><00:02:28.080><c> people</c><00:02:28.239><c> who</c><00:02:28.480><c> can</c><00:02:28.720><c> probably</c>

00:02:28.949 --> 00:02:28.959 align:start position:0%
they're hiring people who can probably
 

00:02:28.959 --> 00:02:31.990 align:start position:0%
they're hiring people who can probably
run<00:02:29.120><c> circles</c><00:02:29.520><c> around</c><00:02:29.840><c> me.</c>

00:02:31.990 --> 00:02:32.000 align:start position:0%
run circles around me.
 

00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:34.869 align:start position:0%
run circles around me.
And<00:02:32.160><c> and</c><00:02:32.480><c> so</c><00:02:32.640><c> if</c><00:02:32.879><c> they</c><00:02:33.120><c> get</c><00:02:33.280><c> to</c><00:02:33.440><c> a</c><00:02:33.680><c> point</c><00:02:33.840><c> where</c>

00:02:34.869 --> 00:02:34.879 align:start position:0%
And and so if they get to a point where
 

00:02:34.879 --> 00:02:37.990 align:start position:0%
And and so if they get to a point where
this<00:02:35.200><c> codebase</c><00:02:36.080><c> becomes</c><00:02:37.120><c> unmaintainable</c>

00:02:37.990 --> 00:02:38.000 align:start position:0%
this codebase becomes unmaintainable
 

00:02:38.000 --> 00:02:41.750 align:start position:0%
this codebase becomes unmaintainable
even<00:02:38.239><c> for</c><00:02:38.480><c> Claude,</c>

00:02:41.750 --> 00:02:41.760 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:02:41.760 --> 00:02:44.630 align:start position:0%
 
that<00:02:42.000><c> would</c><00:02:42.160><c> be</c><00:02:42.560><c> a</c><00:02:42.879><c> pretty</c><00:02:43.120><c> big</c><00:02:43.280><c> disaster.</c><00:02:44.400><c> A</c>

00:02:44.630 --> 00:02:44.640 align:start position:0%
that would be a pretty big disaster. A
 

00:02:44.640 --> 00:02:46.390 align:start position:0%
that would be a pretty big disaster. A
lot<00:02:44.720><c> of</c><00:02:44.879><c> people</c><00:02:45.040><c> would</c><00:02:45.280><c> suddenly</c><00:02:45.680><c> be</c><00:02:45.920><c> like,</c>

00:02:46.390 --> 00:02:46.400 align:start position:0%
lot of people would suddenly be like,
 

00:02:46.400 --> 00:02:49.110 align:start position:0%
lot of people would suddenly be like,
uh,<00:02:47.680><c> okay,</c><00:02:48.080><c> maybe</c><00:02:48.239><c> we</c><00:02:48.480><c> still</c><00:02:48.640><c> need</c><00:02:48.800><c> to</c><00:02:48.959><c> think</c>

00:02:49.110 --> 00:02:49.120 align:start position:0%
uh, okay, maybe we still need to think
 

00:02:49.120 --> 00:02:52.630 align:start position:0%
uh, okay, maybe we still need to think
about<00:02:49.599><c> simplicity.</c>

00:02:52.630 --> 00:02:52.640 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:02:52.640 --> 00:02:55.430 align:start position:0%
 
But<00:02:52.879><c> if</c><00:02:53.040><c> they</c><00:02:53.360><c> prove</c><00:02:53.760><c> that</c><00:02:54.640><c> they</c><00:02:54.959><c> can</c><00:02:55.200><c> still</c>

00:02:55.430 --> 00:02:55.440 align:start position:0%
But if they prove that they can still
 

00:02:55.440 --> 00:02:58.150 align:start position:0%
But if they prove that they can still
maintain<00:02:55.840><c> it,</c>

00:02:58.150 --> 00:02:58.160 align:start position:0%
maintain it,
 

00:02:58.160 --> 00:03:00.710 align:start position:0%
maintain it,
um,<00:02:58.720><c> then</c><00:02:58.959><c> maybe</c><00:02:59.280><c> people</c><00:02:59.519><c> like</c><00:02:59.680><c> me</c><00:02:59.920><c> need</c><00:03:00.160><c> to</c>

00:03:00.710 --> 00:03:00.720 align:start position:0%
um, then maybe people like me need to
 

00:03:00.720 --> 00:03:02.790 align:start position:0%
um, then maybe people like me need to
re-evaluate.

00:03:02.790 --> 00:03:02.800 align:start position:0%
re-evaluate.
 

00:03:02.800 --> 00:03:04.710 align:start position:0%
re-evaluate.
Again,<00:03:03.200><c> you</c><00:03:03.360><c> saw</c><00:03:03.519><c> in</c><00:03:03.680><c> my</c><00:03:03.840><c> last</c><00:03:04.000><c> video,</c><00:03:04.319><c> I'm</c><00:03:04.560><c> not</c>

00:03:04.710 --> 00:03:04.720 align:start position:0%
Again, you saw in my last video, I'm not
 

00:03:04.720 --> 00:03:07.430 align:start position:0%
Again, you saw in my last video, I'm not
against<00:03:05.040><c> AI.</c><00:03:05.599><c> I'm</c><00:03:05.840><c> I'm</c><00:03:06.319><c> in</c><00:03:06.560><c> favor</c><00:03:06.879><c> of</c><00:03:07.120><c> using</c>

00:03:07.430 --> 00:03:07.440 align:start position:0%
against AI. I'm I'm in favor of using
 

00:03:07.440 --> 00:03:10.550 align:start position:0%
against AI. I'm I'm in favor of using
it.<00:03:08.319><c> Um,</c><00:03:08.800><c> but</c><00:03:09.040><c> I</c><00:03:09.280><c> keep</c><00:03:09.440><c> it</c><00:03:09.599><c> on</c><00:03:09.760><c> a</c><00:03:09.920><c> short</c><00:03:10.159><c> leash.</c>

00:03:10.550 --> 00:03:10.560 align:start position:0%
it. Um, but I keep it on a short leash.
 

00:03:10.560 --> 00:03:12.949 align:start position:0%
it. Um, but I keep it on a short leash.
I<00:03:10.800><c> review</c><00:03:11.040><c> the</c><00:03:11.280><c> code</c><00:03:11.519><c> and</c><00:03:11.760><c> I</c><00:03:12.000><c> constantly</c><00:03:12.560><c> steer</c>

00:03:12.949 --> 00:03:12.959 align:start position:0%
I review the code and I constantly steer
 

00:03:12.959 --> 00:03:17.030 align:start position:0%
I review the code and I constantly steer
it<00:03:14.000><c> when</c><00:03:14.400><c> I</c><00:03:14.640><c> see</c><00:03:14.879><c> it</c><00:03:15.120><c> doing</c><00:03:16.239><c> making</c><00:03:16.560><c> a</c><00:03:16.800><c> solution</c>

00:03:17.030 --> 00:03:17.040 align:start position:0%
it when I see it doing making a solution
 

00:03:17.040 --> 00:03:20.390 align:start position:0%
it when I see it doing making a solution
that's<00:03:17.280><c> too</c><00:03:17.519><c> complex.</c>

00:03:20.390 --> 00:03:20.400 align:start position:0%
that's too complex.
 

00:03:20.400 --> 00:03:22.149 align:start position:0%
that's too complex.
They<00:03:20.560><c> I</c><00:03:20.879><c> don't</c><00:03:20.959><c> think</c><00:03:21.120><c> they're</c><00:03:21.280><c> using</c><00:03:21.519><c> AI</c><00:03:21.920><c> that</c>

00:03:22.149 --> 00:03:22.159 align:start position:0%
They I don't think they're using AI that
 

00:03:22.159 --> 00:03:24.710 align:start position:0%
They I don't think they're using AI that
way<00:03:22.560><c> at</c><00:03:22.800><c> Bun.</c>

00:03:24.710 --> 00:03:24.720 align:start position:0%
way at Bun.
 

00:03:24.720 --> 00:03:26.309 align:start position:0%
way at Bun.
There's<00:03:24.879><c> no</c><00:03:25.040><c> way</c><00:03:25.200><c> they</c><00:03:25.440><c> are</c><00:03:25.599><c> if</c><00:03:25.760><c> they're</c><00:03:26.080><c> if</c>

00:03:26.309 --> 00:03:26.319 align:start position:0%
There's no way they are if they're if
 

00:03:26.319 --> 00:03:29.110 align:start position:0%
There's no way they are if they're if
they're<00:03:26.640><c> doing</c><00:03:27.440><c> a</c><00:03:27.760><c> rewrite</c><00:03:28.159><c> like</c><00:03:28.400><c> this</c><00:03:28.640><c> in</c><00:03:28.879><c> a</c>

00:03:29.110 --> 00:03:29.120 align:start position:0%
they're doing a rewrite like this in a
 

00:03:29.120 --> 00:03:31.990 align:start position:0%
they're doing a rewrite like this in a
week<00:03:29.200><c> and</c><00:03:29.360><c> a</c><00:03:29.519><c> half.</c>

00:03:31.990 --> 00:03:32.000 align:start position:0%
week and a half.
 

00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:35.350 align:start position:0%
week and a half.
We'll<00:03:32.319><c> see.</c><00:03:33.599><c> I</c><00:03:33.840><c> mean,</c><00:03:34.480><c> I'm</c><00:03:34.799><c> actually</c><00:03:35.040><c> really</c>

00:03:35.350 --> 00:03:35.360 align:start position:0%
We'll see. I mean, I'm actually really
 

00:03:35.360 --> 00:03:40.070 align:start position:0%
We'll see. I mean, I'm actually really
interested.<00:03:35.840><c> I</c><00:03:36.000><c> want</c><00:03:36.159><c> to</c><00:03:36.319><c> see</c><00:03:37.519><c> um</c><00:03:38.239><c> if</c><00:03:39.599><c> what</c><00:03:39.840><c> I</c>

00:03:40.070 --> 00:03:40.080 align:start position:0%
interested. I want to see um if what I
 

00:03:40.080 --> 00:03:43.589 align:start position:0%
interested. I want to see um if what I
said<00:03:40.239><c> in</c><00:03:40.400><c> that</c><00:03:40.640><c> last</c><00:03:40.879><c> video</c><00:03:42.239><c> proves</c><00:03:42.640><c> true.</c>

00:03:43.589 --> 00:03:43.599 align:start position:0%
said in that last video proves true.
 

00:03:43.599 --> 00:03:45.990 align:start position:0%
said in that last video proves true.
Will<00:03:43.920><c> complexity</c><00:03:44.480><c> ever</c>

00:03:45.990 --> 00:03:46.000 align:start position:0%
Will complexity ever
 

00:03:46.000 --> 00:03:48.149 align:start position:0%
Will complexity ever
grow<00:03:46.560><c> so</c><00:03:46.879><c> fast</c><00:03:47.120><c> that</c><00:03:47.280><c> it</c><00:03:47.440><c> outstrips</c><00:03:48.000><c> the</c>

00:03:48.149 --> 00:03:48.159 align:start position:0%
grow so fast that it outstrips the
 

00:03:48.159 --> 00:03:51.589 align:start position:0%
grow so fast that it outstrips the
model's<00:03:48.560><c> ability</c><00:03:48.959><c> to</c><00:03:49.680><c> deal</c><00:03:49.920><c> with</c><00:03:50.080><c> it?</c><00:03:51.280><c> Okay,</c>

00:03:51.589 --> 00:03:51.599 align:start position:0%
model's ability to deal with it? Okay,
 

00:03:51.599 --> 00:03:53.509 align:start position:0%
model's ability to deal with it? Okay,
doing<00:03:51.840><c> the</c><00:03:52.080><c> initial</c><00:03:52.400><c> conversion</c><00:03:52.879><c> is</c><00:03:53.040><c> the</c><00:03:53.200><c> easy</c>

00:03:53.509 --> 00:03:53.519 align:start position:0%
doing the initial conversion is the easy
 

00:03:53.519 --> 00:03:55.190 align:start position:0%
doing the initial conversion is the easy
part.<00:03:53.760><c> We</c><00:03:53.920><c> know</c><00:03:54.080><c> these</c><00:03:54.319><c> models</c><00:03:54.720><c> are</c><00:03:54.879><c> good</c><00:03:54.959><c> at</c>

00:03:55.190 --> 00:03:55.200 align:start position:0%
part. We know these models are good at
 

00:03:55.200 --> 00:03:58.309 align:start position:0%
part. We know these models are good at
language<00:03:55.680><c> to</c><00:03:55.840><c> language</c><00:03:56.239><c> conversions.</c>

00:03:58.309 --> 00:03:58.319 align:start position:0%
language to language conversions.
 

00:03:58.319 --> 00:04:01.589 align:start position:0%
language to language conversions.
What<00:03:58.480><c> we</c><00:03:58.720><c> don't</c><00:03:58.959><c> know</c><00:03:59.280><c> is</c><00:03:59.760><c> what</c><00:04:00.080><c> happens</c><00:04:00.400><c> next.</c>

00:04:01.589 --> 00:04:01.599 align:start position:0%
What we don't know is what happens next.
 

00:04:01.599 --> 00:04:04.710 align:start position:0%
What we don't know is what happens next.
Will<00:04:01.840><c> they</c><00:04:02.080><c> be</c><00:04:02.239><c> able</c><00:04:02.400><c> to</c><00:04:02.640><c> maintain</c><00:04:04.000><c> and</c><00:04:04.400><c> add</c>

00:04:04.710 --> 00:04:04.720 align:start position:0%
Will they be able to maintain and add
 

00:04:04.720 --> 00:04:07.350 align:start position:0%
Will they be able to maintain and add
features<00:04:05.760><c> and</c><00:04:06.239><c> fix</c><00:04:06.560><c> bugs</c><00:04:06.959><c> without</c>

00:04:07.350 --> 00:04:07.360 align:start position:0%
features and fix bugs without
 

00:04:07.360 --> 00:04:09.750 align:start position:0%
features and fix bugs without
introducing<00:04:07.920><c> new</c><00:04:08.159><c> bugs?</c>

00:04:09.750 --> 00:04:09.760 align:start position:0%
introducing new bugs?
 

00:04:09.760 --> 00:04:12.229 align:start position:0%
introducing new bugs?
Um,<00:04:11.200><c> we're</c><00:04:11.360><c> going</c><00:04:11.439><c> to</c><00:04:11.599><c> have</c><00:04:11.680><c> to</c><00:04:11.840><c> find</c><00:04:12.000><c> out.</c>

00:04:12.229 --> 00:04:12.239 align:start position:0%
Um, we're going to have to find out.
 

00:04:12.239 --> 00:04:14.390 align:start position:0%
Um, we're going to have to find out.
There's<00:04:12.879><c> there's</c><00:04:13.280><c> already</c><00:04:13.519><c> one</c><00:04:13.760><c> bad</c><00:04:14.080><c> sign</c>

00:04:14.390 --> 00:04:14.400 align:start position:0%
There's there's already one bad sign
 

00:04:14.400 --> 00:04:17.349 align:start position:0%
There's there's already one bad sign
though.<00:04:15.360><c> If</c><00:04:15.599><c> you</c><00:04:15.680><c> look</c><00:04:15.760><c> at</c><00:04:15.920><c> that</c><00:04:16.160><c> PR,</c><00:04:16.959><c> the</c><00:04:17.120><c> new</c>

00:04:17.349 --> 00:04:17.359 align:start position:0%
though. If you look at that PR, the new
 

00:04:17.359 --> 00:04:19.909 align:start position:0%
though. If you look at that PR, the new
Rust<00:04:17.680><c> code</c><00:04:18.000><c> base</c><00:04:18.320><c> is</c><00:04:18.720><c> just</c><00:04:19.040><c> over</c><00:04:19.359><c> 1</c><00:04:19.600><c> million</c>

00:04:19.909 --> 00:04:19.919 align:start position:0%
Rust code base is just over 1 million
 

00:04:19.919 --> 00:04:22.790 align:start position:0%
Rust code base is just over 1 million
lines<00:04:20.799><c> of</c><00:04:21.120><c> code.</c>

00:04:22.790 --> 00:04:22.800 align:start position:0%
lines of code.
 

00:04:22.800 --> 00:04:24.950 align:start position:0%
lines of code.
Now,<00:04:23.120><c> the</c><00:04:23.360><c> original</c><00:04:23.680><c> Zig</c><00:04:24.080><c> code</c><00:04:24.320><c> base</c><00:04:24.639><c> was</c>

00:04:24.950 --> 00:04:24.960 align:start position:0%
Now, the original Zig code base was
 

00:04:24.960 --> 00:04:27.350 align:start position:0%
Now, the original Zig code base was
already<00:04:25.280><c> quite</c><00:04:25.600><c> large.</c><00:04:25.919><c> It</c><00:04:26.080><c> was</c><00:04:26.320><c> 640,000</c>

00:04:27.350 --> 00:04:27.360 align:start position:0%
already quite large. It was 640,000
 

00:04:27.360 --> 00:04:29.749 align:start position:0%
already quite large. It was 640,000
lines.

00:04:29.749 --> 00:04:29.759 align:start position:0%
lines.
 

00:04:29.759 --> 00:04:32.790 align:start position:0%
lines.
So,<00:04:30.160><c> this</c><00:04:30.560><c> rewrite</c>

00:04:32.790 --> 00:04:32.800 align:start position:0%
So, this rewrite
 

00:04:32.800 --> 00:04:34.870 align:start position:0%
So, this rewrite
by<00:04:33.120><c> Claude</c>

00:04:34.870 --> 00:04:34.880 align:start position:0%
by Claude
 

00:04:34.880 --> 00:04:38.550 align:start position:0%
by Claude
increased<00:04:36.240><c> the</c><00:04:36.560><c> size</c><00:04:36.960><c> of</c><00:04:37.199><c> the</c><00:04:37.360><c> the</c><00:04:37.919><c> codebase</c>

00:04:38.550 --> 00:04:38.560 align:start position:0%
increased the size of the the codebase
 

00:04:38.560 --> 00:04:41.670 align:start position:0%
increased the size of the the codebase
by<00:04:39.040><c> like</c><00:04:39.360><c> more</c><00:04:39.600><c> than</c><00:04:39.840><c> 60%.</c>

00:04:41.670 --> 00:04:41.680 align:start position:0%
by like more than 60%.
 

00:04:41.680 --> 00:04:44.950 align:start position:0%
by like more than 60%.
Think<00:04:41.919><c> about</c><00:04:42.080><c> how</c><00:04:42.320><c> crazy</c><00:04:42.639><c> that</c><00:04:42.880><c> is.</c><00:04:44.320><c> Rust</c><00:04:44.720><c> is</c>

00:04:44.950 --> 00:04:44.960 align:start position:0%
Think about how crazy that is. Rust is
 

00:04:44.960 --> 00:04:46.629 align:start position:0%
Think about how crazy that is. Rust is
actually<00:04:45.199><c> a</c><00:04:45.440><c> more</c><00:04:45.680><c> concise</c><00:04:46.080><c> language</c><00:04:46.479><c> than</c>

00:04:46.629 --> 00:04:46.639 align:start position:0%
actually a more concise language than
 

00:04:46.639 --> 00:04:48.950 align:start position:0%
actually a more concise language than
Zigg.<00:04:47.120><c> If</c><00:04:47.280><c> you</c><00:04:47.440><c> compare</c>

00:04:48.950 --> 00:04:48.960 align:start position:0%
Zigg. If you compare
 

00:04:48.960 --> 00:04:50.710 align:start position:0%
Zigg. If you compare
uh<00:04:49.120><c> equivalent</c><00:04:49.600><c> code,</c><00:04:50.000><c> the</c><00:04:50.160><c> Zig</c><00:04:50.400><c> code</c><00:04:50.560><c> is</c>

00:04:50.710 --> 00:04:50.720 align:start position:0%
uh equivalent code, the Zig code is
 

00:04:50.720 --> 00:04:54.230 align:start position:0%
uh equivalent code, the Zig code is
usually<00:04:51.120><c> longer</c><00:04:52.320><c> because</c><00:04:53.199><c> Zigg</c><00:04:53.680><c> requires</c><00:04:54.080><c> you</c>

00:04:54.230 --> 00:04:54.240 align:start position:0%
usually longer because Zigg requires you
 

00:04:54.240 --> 00:04:56.150 align:start position:0%
usually longer because Zigg requires you
to<00:04:54.880><c> do</c><00:04:55.040><c> more</c><00:04:55.280><c> things</c><00:04:55.440><c> explicitly.</c><00:04:56.000><c> It</c>

00:04:56.150 --> 00:04:56.160 align:start position:0%
to do more things explicitly. It
 

00:04:56.160 --> 00:04:57.189 align:start position:0%
to do more things explicitly. It
doesn't,<00:04:56.400><c> for</c><00:04:56.479><c> example,</c><00:04:56.720><c> it</c><00:04:56.880><c> doesn't</c><00:04:57.040><c> have</c>

00:04:57.189 --> 00:04:57.199 align:start position:0%
doesn't, for example, it doesn't have
 

00:04:57.199 --> 00:04:58.870 align:start position:0%
doesn't, for example, it doesn't have
destructors.<00:04:57.759><c> So,</c><00:04:57.919><c> the</c><00:04:58.080><c> cleanup</c><00:04:58.479><c> code</c><00:04:58.720><c> is</c>

00:04:58.870 --> 00:04:58.880 align:start position:0%
destructors. So, the cleanup code is
 

00:04:58.880 --> 00:05:02.230 align:start position:0%
destructors. So, the cleanup code is
always<00:04:59.440><c> explicitly</c><00:05:00.160><c> there.</c>

00:05:02.230 --> 00:05:02.240 align:start position:0%
always explicitly there.
 

00:05:02.240 --> 00:05:04.469 align:start position:0%
always explicitly there.
Zig<00:05:02.639><c> is</c><00:05:02.720><c> a</c><00:05:02.880><c> more</c><00:05:03.120><c> verbose</c><00:05:03.600><c> language</c><00:05:04.160><c> and</c>

00:05:04.469 --> 00:05:04.479 align:start position:0%
Zig is a more verbose language and
 

00:05:04.479 --> 00:05:06.550 align:start position:0%
Zig is a more verbose language and
somehow<00:05:04.800><c> the</c><00:05:05.040><c> rewrite</c>

00:05:06.550 --> 00:05:06.560 align:start position:0%
somehow the rewrite
 

00:05:06.560 --> 00:05:09.590 align:start position:0%
somehow the rewrite
exploded<00:05:07.280><c> the</c><00:05:07.440><c> line</c><00:05:07.759><c> count</c><00:05:08.800><c> from</c><00:05:09.120><c> Zigg</c><00:05:09.440><c> to</c>

00:05:09.590 --> 00:05:09.600 align:start position:0%
exploded the line count from Zigg to
 

00:05:09.600 --> 00:05:12.950 align:start position:0%
exploded the line count from Zigg to
Rust.<00:05:10.400><c> How</c><00:05:10.639><c> crazy</c><00:05:10.960><c> is</c><00:05:11.120><c> that?</c>

00:05:12.950 --> 00:05:12.960 align:start position:0%
Rust. How crazy is that?
 

00:05:12.960 --> 00:05:15.350 align:start position:0%
Rust. How crazy is that?
But<00:05:13.280><c> but</c><00:05:13.520><c> there's</c><00:05:14.240><c> even</c><00:05:14.560><c> more.</c><00:05:14.880><c> Just</c><00:05:15.039><c> to</c><00:05:15.199><c> put</c>

00:05:15.350 --> 00:05:15.360 align:start position:0%
But but there's even more. Just to put
 

00:05:15.360 --> 00:05:17.510 align:start position:0%
But but there's even more. Just to put
this<00:05:15.520><c> in</c><00:05:15.680><c> perspective,</c><00:05:16.560><c> there's</c><00:05:17.199><c> something</c>

00:05:17.510 --> 00:05:17.520 align:start position:0%
this in perspective, there's something
 

00:05:17.520 --> 00:05:19.990 align:start position:0%
this in perspective, there's something
even<00:05:17.759><c> more</c><00:05:18.000><c> crazy</c><00:05:18.320><c> here.</c>

00:05:19.990 --> 00:05:20.000 align:start position:0%
even more crazy here.
 

00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:21.830 align:start position:0%
even more crazy here.
I<00:05:20.240><c> don't</c><00:05:20.320><c> know</c><00:05:20.400><c> if</c><00:05:20.560><c> you're</c><00:05:21.199><c> familiar</c><00:05:21.600><c> with</c>

00:05:21.830 --> 00:05:21.840 align:start position:0%
I don't know if you're familiar with
 

00:05:21.840 --> 00:05:24.150 align:start position:0%
I don't know if you're familiar with
Bun.

00:05:24.150 --> 00:05:24.160 align:start position:0%
Bun.
 

00:05:24.160 --> 00:05:26.629 align:start position:0%
Bun.
Bun<00:05:24.479><c> is</c><00:05:24.720><c> not</c><00:05:24.880><c> a</c><00:05:25.199><c> JavaScript</c><00:05:25.759><c> compiler,</c><00:05:26.479><c> just</c>

00:05:26.629 --> 00:05:26.639 align:start position:0%
Bun is not a JavaScript compiler, just
 

00:05:26.639 --> 00:05:31.189 align:start position:0%
Bun is not a JavaScript compiler, just
to<00:05:26.880><c> be</c><00:05:27.039><c> clear.</c><00:05:28.479><c> Um,</c><00:05:29.520><c> Bun</c><00:05:30.000><c> uses</c><00:05:30.320><c> a</c><00:05:30.560><c> JavaScript</c>

00:05:31.189 --> 00:05:31.199 align:start position:0%
to be clear. Um, Bun uses a JavaScript
 

00:05:31.199 --> 00:05:35.270 align:start position:0%
to be clear. Um, Bun uses a JavaScript
compiler,<00:05:32.560><c> right?</c><00:05:33.600><c> Um,</c><00:05:34.000><c> Bun</c><00:05:34.400><c> uses</c><00:05:34.720><c> JavaScript</c>

00:05:35.270 --> 00:05:35.280 align:start position:0%
compiler, right? Um, Bun uses JavaScript
 

00:05:35.280 --> 00:05:38.870 align:start position:0%
compiler, right? Um, Bun uses JavaScript
core,<00:05:36.560><c> which</c><00:05:37.199><c> uh</c><00:05:37.840><c> comes</c><00:05:38.080><c> from</c><00:05:38.240><c> the</c><00:05:38.400><c> WebKit</c>

00:05:38.870 --> 00:05:38.880 align:start position:0%
core, which uh comes from the WebKit
 

00:05:38.880 --> 00:05:40.390 align:start position:0%
core, which uh comes from the WebKit
project.

00:05:40.390 --> 00:05:40.400 align:start position:0%
project.
 

00:05:40.400 --> 00:05:44.390 align:start position:0%
project.
and<00:05:40.639><c> then</c><00:05:41.199><c> they</c><00:05:41.520><c> just</c><00:05:41.759><c> wrap</c><00:05:42.080><c> it</c><00:05:43.120><c> and</c><00:05:43.919><c> implement</c>

00:05:44.390 --> 00:05:44.400 align:start position:0%
and then they just wrap it and implement
 

00:05:44.400 --> 00:05:47.350 align:start position:0%
and then they just wrap it and implement
the<00:05:44.560><c> node</c><00:05:44.880><c> API</c><00:05:45.759><c> as</c><00:05:46.080><c> well</c><00:05:46.160><c> as</c><00:05:46.400><c> their</c><00:05:46.639><c> own</c>

00:05:47.350 --> 00:05:47.360 align:start position:0%
the node API as well as their own
 

00:05:47.360 --> 00:05:49.350 align:start position:0%
the node API as well as their own
additional<00:05:48.080><c> standard</c><00:05:48.479><c> library.</c><00:05:49.039><c> That's</c><00:05:49.199><c> all</c>

00:05:49.350 --> 00:05:49.360 align:start position:0%
additional standard library. That's all
 

00:05:49.360 --> 00:05:51.749 align:start position:0%
additional standard library. That's all
bun<00:05:49.600><c> is</c><00:05:49.840><c> doing.</c>

00:05:51.749 --> 00:05:51.759 align:start position:0%
bun is doing.
 

00:05:51.759 --> 00:05:54.629 align:start position:0%
bun is doing.
I<00:05:52.080><c> think</c><00:05:52.160><c> you</c><00:05:52.400><c> can</c><00:05:52.560><c> agree</c><00:05:52.880><c> with</c><00:05:53.039><c> me</c><00:05:53.199><c> that</c><00:05:54.160><c> the</c>

00:05:54.629 --> 00:05:54.639 align:start position:0%
I think you can agree with me that the
 

00:05:54.639 --> 00:05:57.430 align:start position:0%
I think you can agree with me that the
JIT<00:05:55.039><c> compiler</c><00:05:55.600><c> for</c><00:05:55.840><c> JavaScript</c><00:05:56.400><c> is</c><00:05:56.639><c> the</c><00:05:56.880><c> more</c>

00:05:57.430 --> 00:05:57.440 align:start position:0%
JIT compiler for JavaScript is the more
 

00:05:57.440 --> 00:06:00.070 align:start position:0%
JIT compiler for JavaScript is the more
complex<00:05:57.919><c> part</c><00:05:58.160><c> of</c><00:05:58.400><c> this,</c>

00:06:00.070 --> 00:06:00.080 align:start position:0%
complex part of this,
 

00:06:00.080 --> 00:06:05.430 align:start position:0%
complex part of this,
not<00:06:00.320><c> the</c><00:06:00.560><c> wrapper</c><00:06:02.000><c> around</c><00:06:02.400><c> it</c><00:06:03.360><c> that</c><00:06:03.680><c> adds</c>

00:06:05.430 --> 00:06:05.440 align:start position:0%
not the wrapper around it that adds
 

00:06:05.440 --> 00:06:09.430 align:start position:0%
not the wrapper around it that adds
um<00:06:06.479><c> implements</c><00:06:06.880><c> the</c><00:06:07.039><c> node</c><00:06:07.360><c> API.</c>

00:06:09.430 --> 00:06:09.440 align:start position:0%
um implements the node API.
 

00:06:09.440 --> 00:06:12.870 align:start position:0%
um implements the node API.
Well,<00:06:09.680><c> I</c><00:06:09.840><c> looked</c><00:06:10.000><c> it</c><00:06:10.160><c> up.</c><00:06:10.400><c> JavaScript</c><00:06:10.960><c> Core</c>

00:06:12.870 --> 00:06:12.880 align:start position:0%
Well, I looked it up. JavaScript Core
 

00:06:12.880 --> 00:06:16.550 align:start position:0%
Well, I looked it up. JavaScript Core
the<00:06:13.360><c> uh</c><00:06:13.919><c> the</c><00:06:14.240><c> compiler</c><00:06:14.639><c> that</c><00:06:14.800><c> they're</c><00:06:15.039><c> using</c>

00:06:16.550 --> 00:06:16.560 align:start position:0%
the uh the compiler that they're using
 

00:06:16.560 --> 00:06:21.830 align:start position:0%
the uh the compiler that they're using
is<00:06:17.120><c> about</c><00:06:18.319><c> 590,000</c><00:06:19.440><c> lines</c><00:06:20.000><c> of</c><00:06:20.240><c> C++.</c>

00:06:21.830 --> 00:06:21.840 align:start position:0%
is about 590,000 lines of C++.
 

00:06:21.840 --> 00:06:25.430 align:start position:0%
is about 590,000 lines of C++.
It's<00:06:22.080><c> just</c><00:06:22.240><c> under</c><00:06:22.560><c> 600,000</c><00:06:23.280><c> lines.</c>

00:06:25.430 --> 00:06:25.440 align:start position:0%
It's just under 600,000 lines.
 

00:06:25.440 --> 00:06:27.909 align:start position:0%
It's just under 600,000 lines.
So<00:06:25.840><c> even</c><00:06:26.080><c> the</c><00:06:26.400><c> original</c><00:06:26.800><c> Zigg</c><00:06:27.199><c> codebase</c><00:06:27.680><c> of</c>

00:06:27.909 --> 00:06:27.919 align:start position:0%
So even the original Zigg codebase of
 

00:06:27.919 --> 00:06:31.110 align:start position:0%
So even the original Zigg codebase of
bun<00:06:28.319><c> was</c><00:06:28.560><c> already</c><00:06:29.039><c> larger</c>

00:06:31.110 --> 00:06:31.120 align:start position:0%
bun was already larger
 

00:06:31.120 --> 00:06:33.590 align:start position:0%
bun was already larger
in<00:06:31.440><c> line</c><00:06:31.759><c> count</c>

00:06:33.590 --> 00:06:33.600 align:start position:0%
in line count
 

00:06:33.600 --> 00:06:36.550 align:start position:0%
in line count
than<00:06:33.840><c> the</c><00:06:34.400><c> JIT</c><00:06:34.960><c> compiler,</c>

00:06:36.550 --> 00:06:36.560 align:start position:0%
than the JIT compiler,
 

00:06:36.560 --> 00:06:38.390 align:start position:0%
than the JIT compiler,
the<00:06:36.800><c> JavaScript</c><00:06:37.360><c> compiler</c><00:06:37.840><c> that</c><00:06:38.080><c> they're</c>

00:06:38.390 --> 00:06:38.400 align:start position:0%
the JavaScript compiler that they're
 

00:06:38.400 --> 00:06:40.150 align:start position:0%
the JavaScript compiler that they're
wrapping.

00:06:40.150 --> 00:06:40.160 align:start position:0%
wrapping.
 

00:06:40.160 --> 00:06:42.710 align:start position:0%
wrapping.
And<00:06:40.400><c> now</c><00:06:40.639><c> with</c><00:06:40.800><c> this</c><00:06:41.039><c> Rust</c><00:06:41.440><c> rewrite,</c><00:06:42.400><c> it's</c>

00:06:42.710 --> 00:06:42.720 align:start position:0%
And now with this Rust rewrite, it's
 

00:06:42.720 --> 00:06:45.350 align:start position:0%
And now with this Rust rewrite, it's
nearly<00:06:43.120><c> double</c><00:06:43.919><c> the</c><00:06:44.240><c> line</c><00:06:44.560><c> count</c><00:06:45.039><c> of</c>

00:06:45.350 --> 00:06:45.360 align:start position:0%
nearly double the line count of
 

00:06:45.360 --> 00:06:47.670 align:start position:0%
nearly double the line count of
JavaScript<00:06:45.919><c> core.</c><00:06:46.319><c> How</c><00:06:46.639><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:06:47.039><c> insane</c><00:06:47.440><c> is</c>

00:06:47.670 --> 00:06:47.680 align:start position:0%
JavaScript core. How [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] insane is
 

00:06:47.680 --> 00:06:49.670 align:start position:0%
JavaScript core. How [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] insane is
that?

00:06:49.670 --> 00:06:49.680 align:start position:0%
that?
 

00:06:49.680 --> 00:06:52.230 align:start position:0%
that?
Like<00:06:49.919><c> what</c><00:06:50.080><c> the</c><00:06:50.240><c> hell</c><00:06:50.400><c> is</c><00:06:50.560><c> it</c><00:06:50.720><c> even</c><00:06:50.960><c> doing?</c>

00:06:52.230 --> 00:06:52.240 align:start position:0%
Like what the hell is it even doing?
 

00:06:52.240 --> 00:06:54.230 align:start position:0%
Like what the hell is it even doing?
What<00:06:52.400><c> is</c><00:06:52.560><c> it</c><00:06:52.800><c> actually</c><00:06:53.120><c> doing?</c><00:06:53.520><c> and</c><00:06:53.680><c> and</c><00:06:53.680><c> and</c>

00:06:54.230 --> 00:06:54.240 align:start position:0%
What is it actually doing? and and and
 

00:06:54.240 --> 00:06:56.550 align:start position:0%
What is it actually doing? and and and
explain<00:06:54.560><c> how</c><00:06:54.800><c> that</c><00:06:55.280><c> requires</c><00:06:55.919><c> double</c><00:06:56.319><c> the</c>

00:06:56.550 --> 00:06:56.560 align:start position:0%
explain how that requires double the
 

00:06:56.560 --> 00:06:59.909 align:start position:0%
explain how that requires double the
line<00:06:56.800><c> count</c><00:06:58.000><c> of</c><00:06:58.319><c> a</c>

00:06:59.909 --> 00:06:59.919 align:start position:0%
line count of a
 

00:06:59.919 --> 00:07:03.830 align:start position:0%
line count of a
very<00:07:01.360><c> advanced</c><00:07:02.240><c> featureful</c>

00:07:03.830 --> 00:07:03.840 align:start position:0%
very advanced featureful
 

00:07:03.840 --> 00:07:06.790 align:start position:0%
very advanced featureful
JavaScript<00:07:04.479><c> JIT</c><00:07:04.880><c> compiler.</c><00:07:05.919><c> Explain</c><00:07:06.319><c> that</c><00:07:06.560><c> to</c>

00:07:06.790 --> 00:07:06.800 align:start position:0%
JavaScript JIT compiler. Explain that to
 

00:07:06.800 --> 00:07:14.950 align:start position:0%
JavaScript JIT compiler. Explain that to
me.

00:07:14.950 --> 00:07:14.960 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:07:14.960 --> 00:07:17.909 align:start position:0%
 
It's<00:07:15.199><c> going</c><00:07:15.280><c> to</c><00:07:15.440><c> be</c><00:07:15.520><c> very</c><00:07:15.840><c> interesting</c><00:07:16.639><c> to</c><00:07:16.960><c> see</c>

00:07:17.909 --> 00:07:17.919 align:start position:0%
It's going to be very interesting to see
 

00:07:17.919 --> 00:07:22.230 align:start position:0%
It's going to be very interesting to see
uh<00:07:18.639><c> what</c><00:07:18.880><c> the</c><00:07:19.039><c> limits</c><00:07:19.440><c> are.</c>

00:07:22.230 --> 00:07:22.240 align:start position:0%
uh what the limits are.
 

00:07:22.240 --> 00:07:25.350 align:start position:0%
uh what the limits are.
And<00:07:22.560><c> I</c><00:07:22.960><c> one</c><00:07:23.199><c> thing</c><00:07:23.360><c> I</c><00:07:23.759><c> can</c><00:07:24.000><c> predict</c><00:07:24.400><c> is</c><00:07:24.639><c> that</c>

00:07:25.350 --> 00:07:25.360 align:start position:0%
And I one thing I can predict is that
 

00:07:25.360 --> 00:07:27.189 align:start position:0%
And I one thing I can predict is that
the<00:07:25.599><c> line</c><00:07:25.840><c> count</c><00:07:26.080><c> is</c><00:07:26.240><c> not</c><00:07:26.400><c> going</c><00:07:26.479><c> to</c><00:07:26.560><c> stay</c><00:07:26.720><c> at</c><00:07:26.960><c> 1</c>

00:07:27.189 --> 00:07:27.199 align:start position:0%
the line count is not going to stay at 1
 

00:07:27.199 --> 00:07:29.189 align:start position:0%
the line count is not going to stay at 1
million.<00:07:27.599><c> Guys,</c>

00:07:29.189 --> 00:07:29.199 align:start position:0%
million. Guys,
 

00:07:29.199 --> 00:07:31.270 align:start position:0%
million. Guys,
as<00:07:29.440><c> I</c><00:07:29.599><c> said</c><00:07:29.680><c> in</c><00:07:29.919><c> my</c><00:07:30.080><c> last</c><00:07:30.240><c> video,</c><00:07:30.639><c> complexity</c>

00:07:31.270 --> 00:07:31.280 align:start position:0%
as I said in my last video, complexity
 

00:07:31.280 --> 00:07:34.950 align:start position:0%
as I said in my last video, complexity
compounds<00:07:32.319><c> when</c><00:07:32.560><c> you</c><00:07:32.800><c> allow</c><00:07:33.280><c> a</c><00:07:33.440><c> a</c><00:07:34.000><c> complex</c>

00:07:34.950 --> 00:07:34.960 align:start position:0%
compounds when you allow a a complex
 

00:07:34.960 --> 00:07:37.510 align:start position:0%
compounds when you allow a a complex
solution<00:07:35.360><c> to</c><00:07:35.599><c> get</c><00:07:35.759><c> into</c><00:07:35.919><c> your</c><00:07:36.080><c> codebase.</c>

00:07:37.510 --> 00:07:37.520 align:start position:0%
solution to get into your codebase.
 

00:07:37.520 --> 00:07:39.909 align:start position:0%
solution to get into your codebase.
Every<00:07:38.080><c> change</c><00:07:38.639><c> after</c><00:07:38.960><c> that</c><00:07:39.280><c> has</c><00:07:39.440><c> to</c><00:07:39.599><c> be</c><00:07:39.759><c> more</c>

00:07:39.909 --> 00:07:39.919 align:start position:0%
Every change after that has to be more
 

00:07:39.919 --> 00:07:42.309 align:start position:0%
Every change after that has to be more
complex,<00:07:40.479><c> too.</c>

00:07:42.309 --> 00:07:42.319 align:start position:0%
complex, too.
 

00:07:42.319 --> 00:07:43.670 align:start position:0%
complex, too.
I<00:07:42.560><c> think</c><00:07:42.639><c> they're</c><00:07:42.880><c> going</c><00:07:42.960><c> to</c><00:07:43.039><c> be</c><00:07:43.199><c> adding</c><00:07:43.440><c> an</c>

00:07:43.670 --> 00:07:43.680 align:start position:0%
I think they're going to be adding an
 

00:07:43.680 --> 00:07:46.629 align:start position:0%
I think they're going to be adding an
insane<00:07:44.240><c> amount</c><00:07:44.800><c> of</c><00:07:45.120><c> code</c><00:07:45.360><c> to</c><00:07:45.599><c> this</c><00:07:45.919><c> project</c><00:07:46.400><c> in</c>

00:07:46.629 --> 00:07:46.639 align:start position:0%
insane amount of code to this project in
 

00:07:46.639 --> 00:07:49.749 align:start position:0%
insane amount of code to this project in
the<00:07:46.800><c> future</c><00:07:47.360><c> just</c><00:07:47.599><c> to</c><00:07:47.759><c> maintain</c><00:07:48.160><c> it.</c>

00:07:49.749 --> 00:07:49.759 align:start position:0%
the future just to maintain it.
 

00:07:49.759 --> 00:07:55.270 align:start position:0%
the future just to maintain it.
That's<00:07:50.000><c> my</c><00:07:50.240><c> prediction.</c>

00:07:55.270 --> 00:07:55.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:07:55.280 --> 00:07:59.029 align:start position:0%
 
you<00:07:55.520><c> know</c><00:07:56.000><c> um</c>

00:07:59.029 --> 00:07:59.039 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:07:59.039 --> 00:08:00.869 align:start position:0%
 
people<00:07:59.280><c> just</c><00:07:59.520><c> don't</c><00:07:59.759><c> really</c><00:08:00.000><c> appreciate</c><00:08:00.639><c> this</c>

00:08:00.869 --> 00:08:00.879 align:start position:0%
people just don't really appreciate this
 

00:08:00.879 --> 00:08:03.909 align:start position:0%
people just don't really appreciate this
this<00:08:01.360><c> entire</c><00:08:01.919><c> topic</c><00:08:02.319><c> of</c><00:08:02.879><c> complexity</c><00:08:03.599><c> and</c>

00:08:03.909 --> 00:08:03.919 align:start position:0%
this entire topic of complexity and
 

00:08:03.919 --> 00:08:07.510 align:start position:0%
this entire topic of complexity and
simplicity.

00:08:07.510 --> 00:08:07.520 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:08:07.520 --> 00:08:10.070 align:start position:0%
 
I<00:08:07.759><c> think</c><00:08:07.840><c> it's</c><00:08:08.080><c> the</c><00:08:08.319><c> most</c><00:08:08.560><c> important</c>

00:08:10.070 --> 00:08:10.080 align:start position:0%
I think it's the most important
 

00:08:10.080 --> 00:08:13.350 align:start position:0%
I think it's the most important
topic<00:08:10.479><c> in</c><00:08:10.720><c> our</c><00:08:10.960><c> industry</c><00:08:12.319><c> and</c><00:08:12.639><c> almost</c><00:08:12.960><c> nobody</c>

00:08:13.350 --> 00:08:13.360 align:start position:0%
topic in our industry and almost nobody
 

00:08:13.360 --> 00:08:17.189 align:start position:0%
topic in our industry and almost nobody
can<00:08:13.599><c> even</c><00:08:13.919><c> talk</c><00:08:14.080><c> about</c><00:08:14.319><c> it</c><00:08:14.479><c> correctly.</c>

00:08:17.189 --> 00:08:17.199 align:start position:0%
can even talk about it correctly.
 

00:08:17.199 --> 00:08:19.589 align:start position:0%
can even talk about it correctly.
There's<00:08:17.520><c> a</c><00:08:17.680><c> lot</c><00:08:17.759><c> that</c><00:08:17.919><c> we</c><00:08:18.160><c> can</c><00:08:18.319><c> learn</c><00:08:19.199><c> by</c>

00:08:19.589 --> 00:08:19.599 align:start position:0%
There's a lot that we can learn by
 

00:08:19.599 --> 00:08:22.790 align:start position:0%
There's a lot that we can learn by
looking<00:08:19.840><c> at</c><00:08:20.080><c> other</c><00:08:20.319><c> domains.</c>

00:08:22.790 --> 00:08:22.800 align:start position:0%
looking at other domains.
 

00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:24.710 align:start position:0%
looking at other domains.
I'm<00:08:23.039><c> from</c><00:08:23.199><c> a</c><00:08:23.360><c> military</c><00:08:23.759><c> family.</c><00:08:24.160><c> Both</c><00:08:24.400><c> of</c><00:08:24.560><c> my</c>

00:08:24.710 --> 00:08:24.720 align:start position:0%
I'm from a military family. Both of my
 

00:08:24.720 --> 00:08:28.230 align:start position:0%
I'm from a military family. Both of my
parents<00:08:24.960><c> were</c><00:08:25.120><c> in</c><00:08:25.280><c> the</c><00:08:25.440><c> Navy.</c><00:08:26.160><c> My</c><00:08:26.479><c> dad</c>

00:08:28.230 --> 00:08:28.240 align:start position:0%
parents were in the Navy. My dad
 

00:08:28.240 --> 00:08:31.830 align:start position:0%
parents were in the Navy. My dad
uh<00:08:28.400><c> was</c><00:08:28.639><c> in</c><00:08:28.879><c> for</c><00:08:29.840><c> almost</c><00:08:30.160><c> four</c><00:08:30.479><c> decades.</c><00:08:31.199><c> He</c>

00:08:31.830 --> 00:08:31.840 align:start position:0%
uh was in for almost four decades. He
 

00:08:31.840 --> 00:08:34.949 align:start position:0%
uh was in for almost four decades. He
primarily<00:08:32.399><c> was</c><00:08:32.560><c> on</c><00:08:32.880><c> aircraft</c><00:08:33.360><c> carriers.</c>

00:08:34.949 --> 00:08:34.959 align:start position:0%
primarily was on aircraft carriers.
 

00:08:34.959 --> 00:08:37.750 align:start position:0%
primarily was on aircraft carriers.
He<00:08:35.200><c> was</c><00:08:35.279><c> an</c><00:08:35.440><c> ordinance.</c>

00:08:37.750 --> 00:08:37.760 align:start position:0%
He was an ordinance.
 

00:08:37.760 --> 00:08:39.750 align:start position:0%
He was an ordinance.
So,<00:08:38.080><c> as</c><00:08:38.320><c> a</c><00:08:38.479><c> kid,</c><00:08:38.719><c> of</c><00:08:38.880><c> course,</c><00:08:39.039><c> I</c><00:08:39.279><c> was</c><00:08:39.360><c> kind</c><00:08:39.519><c> of</c><00:08:39.519><c> a</c>

00:08:39.750 --> 00:08:39.760 align:start position:0%
So, as a kid, of course, I was kind of a
 

00:08:39.760 --> 00:08:43.269 align:start position:0%
So, as a kid, of course, I was kind of a
war<00:08:40.000><c> buff.</c><00:08:41.120><c> me</c><00:08:41.360><c> and</c><00:08:41.519><c> my</c><00:08:41.760><c> buddies,</c><00:08:42.080><c> we</c><00:08:42.320><c> would</c><00:08:43.039><c> we</c>

00:08:43.269 --> 00:08:43.279 align:start position:0%
war buff. me and my buddies, we would we
 

00:08:43.279 --> 00:08:48.870 align:start position:0%
war buff. me and my buddies, we would we
would<00:08:43.519><c> always</c><00:08:44.240><c> uh</c><00:08:45.440><c> you</c><00:08:45.680><c> know</c><00:08:46.480><c> uh</c><00:08:47.680><c> like</c><00:08:48.000><c> read</c>

00:08:48.870 --> 00:08:48.880 align:start position:0%
would always uh you know uh like read
 

00:08:48.880 --> 00:08:53.110 align:start position:0%
would always uh you know uh like read
World<00:08:49.040><c> War</c><00:08:49.279><c> II</c><00:08:49.519><c> books</c><00:08:50.000><c> and</c><00:08:50.720><c> uh</c><00:08:52.000><c> and</c><00:08:52.560><c> even</c><00:08:52.800><c> even</c>

00:08:53.110 --> 00:08:53.120 align:start position:0%
World War II books and uh and even even
 

00:08:53.120 --> 00:08:55.670 align:start position:0%
World War II books and uh and even even
dress<00:08:53.440><c> in</c><00:08:53.920><c> military</c><00:08:54.480><c> fatigues</c><00:08:55.040><c> and</c><00:08:55.200><c> stuff</c><00:08:55.360><c> as</c>

00:08:55.670 --> 00:08:55.680 align:start position:0%
dress in military fatigues and stuff as
 

00:08:55.680 --> 00:08:57.269 align:start position:0%
dress in military fatigues and stuff as
kids

00:08:57.269 --> 00:08:57.279 align:start position:0%
kids
 

00:08:57.279 --> 00:09:00.710 align:start position:0%
kids
and<00:08:57.920><c> um</c><00:08:59.040><c> I</c><00:08:59.279><c> loved</c><00:08:59.600><c> reading</c><00:08:59.920><c> about</c><00:09:00.320><c> like</c>

00:09:00.710 --> 00:09:00.720 align:start position:0%
and um I loved reading about like
 

00:09:00.720 --> 00:09:03.670 align:start position:0%
and um I loved reading about like
nuclear<00:09:01.279><c> submarines</c><00:09:01.920><c> and</c><00:09:02.959><c> planes</c><00:09:03.360><c> like</c><00:09:03.519><c> the</c>

00:09:03.670 --> 00:09:03.680 align:start position:0%
nuclear submarines and planes like the
 

00:09:03.680 --> 00:09:06.150 align:start position:0%
nuclear submarines and planes like the
F-22.

00:09:06.150 --> 00:09:06.160 align:start position:0%
F-22.
 

00:09:06.160 --> 00:09:08.150 align:start position:0%
F-22.
One<00:09:06.480><c> plane</c><00:09:06.720><c> I</c><00:09:06.880><c> did</c><00:09:07.040><c> not</c><00:09:07.200><c> appreciate</c><00:09:07.760><c> enough</c>

00:09:08.150 --> 00:09:08.160 align:start position:0%
One plane I did not appreciate enough
 

00:09:08.160 --> 00:09:10.070 align:start position:0%
One plane I did not appreciate enough
because<00:09:08.399><c> it's</c><00:09:08.720><c> not</c><00:09:08.880><c> nearly</c><00:09:09.120><c> as</c><00:09:09.360><c> sexy</c><00:09:09.760><c> is</c><00:09:09.920><c> the</c>

00:09:10.070 --> 00:09:10.080 align:start position:0%
because it's not nearly as sexy is the
 

00:09:10.080 --> 00:09:13.509 align:start position:0%
because it's not nearly as sexy is the
B-52<00:09:11.519><c> Stratofortress.</c>

00:09:13.509 --> 00:09:13.519 align:start position:0%
B-52 Stratofortress.
 

00:09:13.519 --> 00:09:15.750 align:start position:0%
B-52 Stratofortress.
Um,<00:09:13.839><c> which</c><00:09:14.160><c> arguably</c><00:09:14.720><c> is</c><00:09:15.120><c> one</c><00:09:15.360><c> of</c><00:09:15.440><c> the</c><00:09:15.600><c> most</c>

00:09:15.750 --> 00:09:15.760 align:start position:0%
Um, which arguably is one of the most
 

00:09:15.760 --> 00:09:18.790 align:start position:0%
Um, which arguably is one of the most
successful<00:09:16.959><c> projects</c><00:09:17.519><c> in</c><00:09:17.920><c> US</c><00:09:18.240><c> military</c>

00:09:18.790 --> 00:09:18.800 align:start position:0%
successful projects in US military
 

00:09:18.800 --> 00:09:20.630 align:start position:0%
successful projects in US military
history.

00:09:20.630 --> 00:09:20.640 align:start position:0%
history.
 

00:09:20.640 --> 00:09:23.750 align:start position:0%
history.
Uh,<00:09:20.959><c> we</c><00:09:21.200><c> are</c><00:09:21.360><c> still</c><00:09:21.600><c> using</c><00:09:21.839><c> it</c><00:09:22.000><c> today</c><00:09:23.440><c> uh</c><00:09:23.600><c> in</c>

00:09:23.750 --> 00:09:23.760 align:start position:0%
Uh, we are still using it today uh in
 

00:09:23.760 --> 00:09:25.269 align:start position:0%
Uh, we are still using it today uh in
Iran.

00:09:25.269 --> 00:09:25.279 align:start position:0%
Iran.
 

00:09:25.279 --> 00:09:28.470 align:start position:0%
Iran.
It<00:09:25.519><c> first</c><00:09:25.760><c> flew</c><00:09:26.080><c> in</c><00:09:26.320><c> 1952.</c>

00:09:28.470 --> 00:09:28.480 align:start position:0%
It first flew in 1952.
 

00:09:28.480 --> 00:09:29.990 align:start position:0%
It first flew in 1952.
Think<00:09:28.720><c> about</c><00:09:28.800><c> that.</c><00:09:29.040><c> It</c><00:09:29.279><c> first</c><00:09:29.440><c> flew</c><00:09:29.760><c> during</c>

00:09:29.990 --> 00:09:30.000 align:start position:0%
Think about that. It first flew during
 

00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:32.150 align:start position:0%
Think about that. It first flew during
the<00:09:30.160><c> Korean</c><00:09:30.560><c> War</c><00:09:31.040><c> and</c><00:09:31.279><c> we're</c><00:09:31.519><c> still</c><00:09:31.680><c> using</c><00:09:31.920><c> it</c>

00:09:32.150 --> 00:09:32.160 align:start position:0%
the Korean War and we're still using it
 

00:09:32.160 --> 00:09:34.790 align:start position:0%
the Korean War and we're still using it
nearly<00:09:32.560><c> 75</c><00:09:33.120><c> years</c><00:09:33.360><c> later.</c>

00:09:34.790 --> 00:09:34.800 align:start position:0%
nearly 75 years later.
 

00:09:34.800 --> 00:09:37.590 align:start position:0%
nearly 75 years later.
There's<00:09:35.040><c> a</c><00:09:35.200><c> lot</c><00:09:35.279><c> that</c><00:09:35.519><c> we</c><00:09:35.680><c> can</c><00:09:35.839><c> learn</c><00:09:37.279><c> about</c>

00:09:37.590 --> 00:09:37.600 align:start position:0%
There's a lot that we can learn about
 

00:09:37.600 --> 00:09:41.509 align:start position:0%
There's a lot that we can learn about
how<00:09:37.920><c> a</c><00:09:38.160><c> project</c><00:09:38.480><c> of</c><00:09:38.720><c> that</c><00:09:39.040><c> complexity</c>

00:09:41.509 --> 00:09:41.519 align:start position:0%
how a project of that complexity
 

00:09:41.519 --> 00:09:45.590 align:start position:0%
how a project of that complexity
was<00:09:41.920><c> able</c><00:09:42.720><c> to</c><00:09:43.279><c> continue</c><00:09:44.240><c> working</c><00:09:44.959><c> as</c><00:09:45.279><c> long</c><00:09:45.440><c> as</c>

00:09:45.590 --> 00:09:45.600 align:start position:0%
was able to continue working as long as
 

00:09:45.600 --> 00:09:47.750 align:start position:0%
was able to continue working as long as
it<00:09:45.839><c> has.</c>

00:09:47.750 --> 00:09:47.760 align:start position:0%
it has.
 

00:09:47.760 --> 00:09:49.670 align:start position:0%
it has.
Last<00:09:48.000><c> year,</c><00:09:48.320><c> I</c><00:09:48.560><c> came</c><00:09:48.800><c> across</c><00:09:49.040><c> a</c><00:09:49.279><c> random</c>

00:09:49.670 --> 00:09:49.680 align:start position:0%
Last year, I came across a random
 

00:09:49.680 --> 00:09:51.750 align:start position:0%
Last year, I came across a random
comment<00:09:50.000><c> on</c><00:09:50.240><c> Hacker</c><00:09:50.640><c> News</c><00:09:50.959><c> from</c><00:09:51.200><c> someone</c><00:09:51.519><c> who</c>

00:09:51.750 --> 00:09:51.760 align:start position:0%
comment on Hacker News from someone who
 

00:09:51.760 --> 00:09:54.790 align:start position:0%
comment on Hacker News from someone who
worked<00:09:52.080><c> on</c><00:09:52.240><c> the</c><00:09:52.399><c> B-52,</c>

00:09:54.790 --> 00:09:54.800 align:start position:0%
worked on the B-52,
 

00:09:54.800 --> 00:09:57.030 align:start position:0%
worked on the B-52,
and<00:09:55.600><c> he</c><00:09:55.920><c> said</c><00:09:56.080><c> something</c><00:09:56.320><c> that</c><00:09:56.560><c> really</c><00:09:56.800><c> stuck</c>

00:09:57.030 --> 00:09:57.040 align:start position:0%
and he said something that really stuck
 

00:09:57.040 --> 00:09:58.630 align:start position:0%
and he said something that really stuck
with<00:09:57.200><c> me.</c><00:09:57.440><c> He</c><00:09:57.600><c> said</c><00:09:57.760><c> that</c><00:09:58.000><c> the</c><00:09:58.240><c> thing</c><00:09:58.320><c> he</c>

00:09:58.630 --> 00:09:58.640 align:start position:0%
with me. He said that the thing he
 

00:09:58.640 --> 00:10:04.070 align:start position:0%
with me. He said that the thing he
learned<00:09:59.680><c> most</c><00:10:01.040><c> is</c><00:10:01.279><c> that</c><00:10:01.519><c> simplicity</c><00:10:02.080><c> is</c><00:10:02.320><c> king.</c>

00:10:04.070 --> 00:10:04.080 align:start position:0%
learned most is that simplicity is king.
 

00:10:04.080 --> 00:10:06.310 align:start position:0%
learned most is that simplicity is king.
Complexity<00:10:04.640><c> is</c><00:10:04.880><c> the</c><00:10:05.040><c> enemy.</c><00:10:05.760><c> That's</c><00:10:06.000><c> what</c><00:10:06.160><c> he</c>

00:10:06.310 --> 00:10:06.320 align:start position:0%
Complexity is the enemy. That's what he
 

00:10:06.320 --> 00:10:08.230 align:start position:0%
Complexity is the enemy. That's what he
said.

00:10:08.230 --> 00:10:08.240 align:start position:0%
said.
 

00:10:08.240 --> 00:10:10.710 align:start position:0%
said.
I<00:10:08.480><c> imagine</c><00:10:08.880><c> anyone</c><00:10:09.200><c> who</c><00:10:09.440><c> works</c><00:10:09.680><c> on</c><00:10:09.920><c> a</c><00:10:10.320><c> really</c>

00:10:10.710 --> 00:10:10.720 align:start position:0%
I imagine anyone who works on a really
 

00:10:10.720 --> 00:10:12.790 align:start position:0%
I imagine anyone who works on a really
complicated<00:10:11.440><c> project</c><00:10:11.839><c> will</c><00:10:12.160><c> say</c><00:10:12.320><c> the</c><00:10:12.560><c> exact</c>

00:10:12.790 --> 00:10:12.800 align:start position:0%
complicated project will say the exact
 

00:10:12.800 --> 00:10:14.310 align:start position:0%
complicated project will say the exact
same<00:10:13.040><c> thing.</c><00:10:13.440><c> Someone</c><00:10:13.680><c> who</c><00:10:13.920><c> worked</c><00:10:14.079><c> on</c><00:10:14.160><c> the</c>

00:10:14.310 --> 00:10:14.320 align:start position:0%
same thing. Someone who worked on the
 

00:10:14.320 --> 00:10:18.550 align:start position:0%
same thing. Someone who worked on the
Apollo<00:10:14.800><c> program,</c><00:10:15.920><c> someone</c><00:10:16.160><c> who</c><00:10:16.399><c> worked</c><00:10:16.720><c> on</c><00:10:17.279><c> uh</c>

00:10:18.550 --> 00:10:18.560 align:start position:0%
Apollo program, someone who worked on uh
 

00:10:18.560 --> 00:10:21.350 align:start position:0%
Apollo program, someone who worked on uh
on<00:10:18.720><c> a</c><00:10:18.959><c> nuclear</c><00:10:19.360><c> submarine</c><00:10:19.839><c> or</c><00:10:20.079><c> whatever.</c><00:10:21.120><c> I</c>

00:10:21.350 --> 00:10:21.360 align:start position:0%
on a nuclear submarine or whatever. I
 

00:10:21.360 --> 00:10:22.550 align:start position:0%
on a nuclear submarine or whatever. I
bet<00:10:21.519><c> they</c><00:10:21.680><c> all</c><00:10:21.839><c> would</c><00:10:22.000><c> say</c><00:10:22.240><c> something</c>

00:10:22.550 --> 00:10:22.560 align:start position:0%
bet they all would say something
 

00:10:22.560 --> 00:10:24.949 align:start position:0%
bet they all would say something
similar.

00:10:24.949 --> 00:10:24.959 align:start position:0%
similar.
 

00:10:24.959 --> 00:10:27.190 align:start position:0%
similar.
In<00:10:25.120><c> the</c><00:10:25.279><c> software</c><00:10:25.680><c> world,</c><00:10:25.920><c> we</c><00:10:26.160><c> just</c><00:10:26.399><c> don't</c>

00:10:27.190 --> 00:10:27.200 align:start position:0%
In the software world, we just don't
 

00:10:27.200 --> 00:10:30.150 align:start position:0%
In the software world, we just don't
appreciate<00:10:27.680><c> this</c><00:10:28.000><c> subject</c><00:10:28.640><c> enough.</c><00:10:29.680><c> It's</c><00:10:30.000><c> so</c>

00:10:30.150 --> 00:10:30.160 align:start position:0%
appreciate this subject enough. It's so
 

00:10:30.160 --> 00:10:31.750 align:start position:0%
appreciate this subject enough. It's so
much<00:10:30.320><c> easier</c><00:10:30.560><c> to</c><00:10:30.800><c> talk</c><00:10:30.959><c> about</c><00:10:31.200><c> concrete</c>

00:10:31.750 --> 00:10:31.760 align:start position:0%
much easier to talk about concrete
 

00:10:31.760 --> 00:10:34.630 align:start position:0%
much easier to talk about concrete
things<00:10:32.079><c> like</c><00:10:32.480><c> memory</c><00:10:32.880><c> safety.</c><00:10:34.160><c> You</c><00:10:34.320><c> can</c><00:10:34.480><c> point</c>

00:10:34.630 --> 00:10:34.640 align:start position:0%
things like memory safety. You can point
 

00:10:34.640 --> 00:10:37.030 align:start position:0%
things like memory safety. You can point
to<00:10:34.800><c> that.</c><00:10:35.680><c> You</c><00:10:35.839><c> can</c><00:10:36.000><c> point</c><00:10:36.160><c> to</c><00:10:36.399><c> memory</c><00:10:36.720><c> safety</c>

00:10:37.030 --> 00:10:37.040 align:start position:0%
to that. You can point to memory safety
 

00:10:37.040 --> 00:10:39.030 align:start position:0%
to that. You can point to memory safety
or<00:10:37.279><c> performance.</c>

00:10:39.030 --> 00:10:39.040 align:start position:0%
or performance.
 

00:10:39.040 --> 00:10:41.350 align:start position:0%
or performance.
Um,<00:10:39.440><c> you</c><00:10:39.600><c> can</c><00:10:39.760><c> point</c><00:10:39.920><c> to</c><00:10:40.000><c> a</c><00:10:40.240><c> CVE</c><00:10:40.880><c> that</c><00:10:41.120><c> was</c>

00:10:41.350 --> 00:10:41.360 align:start position:0%
Um, you can point to a CVE that was
 

00:10:41.360 --> 00:10:43.509 align:start position:0%
Um, you can point to a CVE that was
caused<00:10:41.680><c> by</c><00:10:41.920><c> a</c><00:10:42.160><c> memory</c><00:10:42.480><c> bug.</c><00:10:42.880><c> What</c><00:10:43.120><c> you</c><00:10:43.279><c> can't</c>

00:10:43.509 --> 00:10:43.519 align:start position:0%
caused by a memory bug. What you can't
 

00:10:43.519 --> 00:10:46.630 align:start position:0%
caused by a memory bug. What you can't
easily<00:10:44.000><c> point</c><00:10:44.240><c> to</c><00:10:44.480><c> is</c><00:10:44.959><c> complexity.</c><00:10:46.399><c> So,</c>

00:10:46.630 --> 00:10:46.640 align:start position:0%
easily point to is complexity. So,
 

00:10:46.640 --> 00:10:48.230 align:start position:0%
easily point to is complexity. So,
people<00:10:46.880><c> just</c><00:10:47.279><c> don't</c><00:10:47.519><c> talk</c><00:10:47.680><c> about</c><00:10:47.839><c> it.</c><00:10:48.079><c> They</c>

00:10:48.230 --> 00:10:48.240 align:start position:0%
people just don't talk about it. They
 

00:10:48.240 --> 00:10:49.829 align:start position:0%
people just don't talk about it. They
don't<00:10:48.399><c> appreciate</c><00:10:48.800><c> it.</c><00:10:49.040><c> They</c><00:10:49.279><c> can</c><00:10:49.360><c> only</c><00:10:49.600><c> talk</c>

00:10:49.829 --> 00:10:49.839 align:start position:0%
don't appreciate it. They can only talk
 

00:10:49.839 --> 00:10:54.389 align:start position:0%
don't appreciate it. They can only talk
about<00:10:50.079><c> the</c><00:10:51.040><c> benefits</c><00:10:52.480><c> of</c><00:10:53.200><c> a</c><00:10:53.600><c> very</c><00:10:53.920><c> complex</c>

00:10:54.389 --> 00:10:54.399 align:start position:0%
about the benefits of a very complex
 

00:10:54.399 --> 00:10:57.269 align:start position:0%
about the benefits of a very complex
language<00:10:54.880><c> like</c><00:10:55.120><c> Rust</c><00:10:55.519><c> or</c><00:10:55.760><c> C++.</c><00:10:56.640><c> They</c><00:10:56.880><c> can</c><00:10:56.959><c> only</c>

00:10:57.269 --> 00:10:57.279 align:start position:0%
language like Rust or C++. They can only
 

00:10:57.279 --> 00:10:58.949 align:start position:0%
language like Rust or C++. They can only
point<00:10:57.760><c> because</c><00:10:58.000><c> it's</c><00:10:58.240><c> much</c><00:10:58.399><c> easier</c><00:10:58.640><c> to</c><00:10:58.800><c> talk</c>

00:10:58.949 --> 00:10:58.959 align:start position:0%
point because it's much easier to talk
 

00:10:58.959 --> 00:11:01.670 align:start position:0%
point because it's much easier to talk
about<00:10:59.120><c> those</c><00:10:59.440><c> concrete</c><00:10:59.920><c> things.</c><00:11:01.360><c> Almost</c>

00:11:01.670 --> 00:11:01.680 align:start position:0%
about those concrete things. Almost
 

00:11:01.680 --> 00:11:04.310 align:start position:0%
about those concrete things. Almost
nobody<00:11:02.160><c> can</c><00:11:02.480><c> talk</c><00:11:02.720><c> about</c>

00:11:04.310 --> 00:11:04.320 align:start position:0%
nobody can talk about
 

00:11:04.320 --> 00:11:07.030 align:start position:0%
nobody can talk about
whether<00:11:04.640><c> those</c><00:11:04.959><c> languages</c><00:11:05.680><c> lead</c><00:11:06.000><c> to</c><00:11:06.560><c> greater</c>

00:11:07.030 --> 00:11:07.040 align:start position:0%
whether those languages lead to greater
 

00:11:07.040 --> 00:11:09.990 align:start position:0%
whether those languages lead to greater
complexity<00:11:07.600><c> and</c><00:11:07.920><c> whether</c><00:11:08.160><c> that</c><00:11:08.480><c> complexity</c>

00:11:09.990 --> 00:11:10.000 align:start position:0%
complexity and whether that complexity
 

00:11:10.000 --> 00:11:12.790 align:start position:0%
complexity and whether that complexity
is<00:11:10.320><c> harmful</c><00:11:10.880><c> in</c><00:11:11.120><c> the</c><00:11:11.279><c> long</c><00:11:11.440><c> run.</c><00:11:12.240><c> It's</c><00:11:12.480><c> so</c><00:11:12.640><c> much</c>

00:11:12.790 --> 00:11:12.800 align:start position:0%
is harmful in the long run. It's so much
 

00:11:12.800 --> 00:11:14.069 align:start position:0%
is harmful in the long run. It's so much
harder<00:11:13.040><c> to</c><00:11:13.200><c> talk</c><00:11:13.360><c> about</c><00:11:13.519><c> that.</c><00:11:13.760><c> It's</c><00:11:13.920><c> so</c>

00:11:14.069 --> 00:11:14.079 align:start position:0%
harder to talk about that. It's so
 

00:11:14.079 --> 00:11:15.670 align:start position:0%
harder to talk about that. It's so
abstract.

00:11:15.670 --> 00:11:15.680 align:start position:0%
abstract.
 

00:11:15.680 --> 00:11:17.269 align:start position:0%
abstract.
And<00:11:15.839><c> yet</c><00:11:16.079><c> I</c><00:11:16.240><c> maintain</c><00:11:16.640><c> it's</c><00:11:16.880><c> the</c><00:11:17.120><c> most</c>

00:11:17.269 --> 00:11:17.279 align:start position:0%
And yet I maintain it's the most
 

00:11:17.279 --> 00:11:21.110 align:start position:0%
And yet I maintain it's the most
important<00:11:18.640><c> topic</c><00:11:19.200><c> in</c><00:11:19.519><c> our</c><00:11:19.760><c> field,</c><00:11:20.640><c> arguably</c>

00:11:21.110 --> 00:11:21.120 align:start position:0%
important topic in our field, arguably
 

00:11:21.120 --> 00:11:23.750 align:start position:0%
important topic in our field, arguably
in<00:11:21.360><c> any</c><00:11:21.600><c> field.</c>

00:11:23.750 --> 00:11:23.760 align:start position:0%
in any field.
 

00:11:23.760 --> 00:11:25.990 align:start position:0%
in any field.
But<00:11:24.000><c> our</c><00:11:24.320><c> field,</c><00:11:24.720><c> I</c><00:11:25.040><c> think,</c><00:11:25.279><c> has</c><00:11:25.600><c> less</c>

00:11:25.990 --> 00:11:26.000 align:start position:0%
But our field, I think, has less
 

00:11:26.000 --> 00:11:28.550 align:start position:0%
But our field, I think, has less
appreciation<00:11:26.720><c> for</c><00:11:26.959><c> it.</c>

00:11:28.550 --> 00:11:28.560 align:start position:0%
appreciation for it.
 

00:11:28.560 --> 00:11:31.350 align:start position:0%
appreciation for it.
I<00:11:28.720><c> think</c><00:11:28.880><c> Rich</c><00:11:29.120><c> Hickey</c><00:11:29.839><c> probably</c>

00:11:31.350 --> 00:11:31.360 align:start position:0%
I think Rich Hickey probably
 

00:11:31.360 --> 00:11:34.870 align:start position:0%
I think Rich Hickey probably
did<00:11:31.600><c> the</c><00:11:31.839><c> most</c><00:11:32.560><c> to</c><00:11:33.519><c> improve</c><00:11:34.000><c> our</c><00:11:34.320><c> ability</c><00:11:34.640><c> to</c>

00:11:34.870 --> 00:11:34.880 align:start position:0%
did the most to improve our ability to
 

00:11:34.880 --> 00:11:37.030 align:start position:0%
did the most to improve our ability to
talk<00:11:35.040><c> about</c><00:11:35.279><c> it.</c>

00:11:37.030 --> 00:11:37.040 align:start position:0%
talk about it.
 

00:11:37.040 --> 00:11:39.269 align:start position:0%
talk about it.
Um,<00:11:37.600><c> which</c><00:11:37.839><c> is</c><00:11:37.920><c> why</c><00:11:38.079><c> I</c><00:11:38.240><c> got</c><00:11:38.399><c> into</c><00:11:38.640><c> closure</c><00:11:39.040><c> back</c>

00:11:39.269 --> 00:11:39.279 align:start position:0%
Um, which is why I got into closure back
 

00:11:39.279 --> 00:11:43.269 align:start position:0%
Um, which is why I got into closure back
then.<00:11:40.720><c> But</c><00:11:40.959><c> here</c><00:11:41.120><c> we</c><00:11:41.360><c> are</c><00:11:41.680><c> 15</c><00:11:42.000><c> years</c><00:11:42.240><c> later</c><00:11:42.640><c> and</c>

00:11:43.269 --> 00:11:43.279 align:start position:0%
then. But here we are 15 years later and
 

00:11:43.279 --> 00:11:45.430 align:start position:0%
then. But here we are 15 years later and
um,<00:11:43.680><c> almost</c><00:11:44.079><c> nobody</c><00:11:44.399><c> in</c><00:11:44.560><c> our</c><00:11:44.720><c> field</c><00:11:45.040><c> can</c><00:11:45.279><c> talk</c>

00:11:45.430 --> 00:11:45.440 align:start position:0%
um, almost nobody in our field can talk
 

00:11:45.440 --> 00:11:51.990 align:start position:0%
um, almost nobody in our field can talk
about<00:11:45.680><c> it.</c>

00:11:51.990 --> 00:11:52.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:11:52.000 --> 00:11:53.350 align:start position:0%
 
So,<00:11:52.240><c> we're</c><00:11:52.480><c> about</c><00:11:52.640><c> to</c><00:11:52.800><c> find</c><00:11:52.959><c> out</c><00:11:53.120><c> how</c>

00:11:53.350 --> 00:11:53.360 align:start position:0%
So, we're about to find out how
 

00:11:53.360 --> 00:11:56.150 align:start position:0%
So, we're about to find out how
important<00:11:53.680><c> this</c><00:11:53.920><c> subject</c><00:11:54.320><c> is.</c>

00:11:56.150 --> 00:11:56.160 align:start position:0%
important this subject is.
 

00:11:56.160 --> 00:11:58.550 align:start position:0%
important this subject is.
A<00:11:56.399><c> million</c><00:11:56.720><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:11:57.200><c> lines.</c><00:11:57.920><c> Are</c><00:11:58.160><c> you</c><00:11:58.320><c> kidding</c>

00:11:58.550 --> 00:11:58.560 align:start position:0%
A million [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] lines. Are you kidding
 

00:11:58.560 --> 00:12:01.430 align:start position:0%
A million [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] lines. Are you kidding
me?

00:12:01.430 --> 00:12:01.440 align:start position:0%
me?
 

00:12:01.440 --> 00:12:03.430 align:start position:0%
me?
I<00:12:01.680><c> think</c><00:12:01.760><c> the</c><00:12:01.920><c> Rust</c><00:12:02.240><c> compiler</c><00:12:02.640><c> itself</c><00:12:02.959><c> is</c><00:12:03.200><c> 2</c>

00:12:03.430 --> 00:12:03.440 align:start position:0%
I think the Rust compiler itself is 2
 

00:12:03.440 --> 00:12:06.310 align:start position:0%
I think the Rust compiler itself is 2
million<00:12:03.680><c> lines.</c><00:12:04.720><c> And</c><00:12:04.959><c> that's</c><00:12:05.519><c> a</c><00:12:05.760><c> Rust</c>

00:12:06.310 --> 00:12:06.320 align:start position:0%
million lines. And that's a Rust
 

00:12:06.320 --> 00:12:08.389 align:start position:0%
million lines. And that's a Rust
compiler.

00:12:08.389 --> 00:12:08.399 align:start position:0%
compiler.
 

00:12:08.399 --> 00:12:11.030 align:start position:0%
compiler.
Bun<00:12:08.800><c> is</c><00:12:08.959><c> a</c><00:12:09.200><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:12:09.760><c> wrapper</c><00:12:10.560><c> around</c>

00:12:11.030 --> 00:12:11.040 align:start position:0%
Bun is a [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] wrapper around
 

00:12:11.040 --> 00:12:13.750 align:start position:0%
Bun is a [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] wrapper around
JavaScript<00:12:11.680><c> 4</c><00:12:12.160><c> and</c><00:12:12.320><c> it's</c><00:12:12.639><c> already</c><00:12:13.120><c> half</c><00:12:13.440><c> the</c>

00:12:13.750 --> 00:12:13.760 align:start position:0%
JavaScript 4 and it's already half the
 

00:12:13.760 --> 00:12:16.710 align:start position:0%
JavaScript 4 and it's already half the
size<00:12:14.320><c> of</c><00:12:14.560><c> the</c><00:12:14.720><c> Rust</c><00:12:15.120><c> compiler.</c>

00:12:16.710 --> 00:12:16.720 align:start position:0%
size of the Rust compiler.
 

00:12:16.720 --> 00:12:19.269 align:start position:0%
size of the Rust compiler.
Am<00:12:16.880><c> I</c><00:12:17.040><c> going</c><00:12:17.279><c> insane</c><00:12:17.680><c> here?</c><00:12:17.920><c> Is</c><00:12:18.160><c> this</c><00:12:18.399><c> not</c><00:12:18.959><c> like</c>

00:12:19.269 --> 00:12:19.279 align:start position:0%
Am I going insane here? Is this not like
 

00:12:19.279 --> 00:12:28.310 align:start position:0%
Am I going insane here? Is this not like
completely<00:12:19.839><c> absurd?</c>

00:12:28.310 --> 00:12:28.320 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:12:28.320 --> 00:12:31.990 align:start position:0%
 
I'm<00:12:28.639><c> fascinated,</c><00:12:29.279><c> guys.</c><00:12:30.240><c> Look,</c><00:12:30.880><c> um</c><00:12:31.519><c> like</c><00:12:31.760><c> I</c>

00:12:31.990 --> 00:12:32.000 align:start position:0%
I'm fascinated, guys. Look, um like I
 

00:12:32.000 --> 00:12:35.910 align:start position:0%
I'm fascinated, guys. Look, um like I
said,<00:12:33.120><c> um</c><00:12:34.399><c> the</c><00:12:34.639><c> the</c><00:12:34.959><c> initial</c><00:12:35.279><c> rewrite</c><00:12:35.600><c> is</c><00:12:35.760><c> the</c>

00:12:35.910 --> 00:12:35.920 align:start position:0%
said, um the the initial rewrite is the
 

00:12:35.920 --> 00:12:37.829 align:start position:0%
said, um the the initial rewrite is the
easy<00:12:36.160><c> part.</c><00:12:36.560><c> The</c><00:12:36.959><c> interesting</c><00:12:37.360><c> question</c><00:12:37.600><c> is</c>

00:12:37.829 --> 00:12:37.839 align:start position:0%
easy part. The interesting question is
 

00:12:37.839 --> 00:12:39.910 align:start position:0%
easy part. The interesting question is
what<00:12:38.079><c> happens</c><00:12:38.399><c> next?</c><00:12:38.959><c> Can</c><00:12:39.200><c> this</c><00:12:39.440><c> actually</c><00:12:39.680><c> be</c>

00:12:39.910 --> 00:12:39.920 align:start position:0%
what happens next? Can this actually be
 

00:12:39.920 --> 00:12:42.470 align:start position:0%
what happens next? Can this actually be
maintained<00:12:40.399><c> or</c><00:12:40.639><c> not?</c>

00:12:42.470 --> 00:12:42.480 align:start position:0%
maintained or not?
 

00:12:42.480 --> 00:12:44.310 align:start position:0%
maintained or not?
you<00:12:42.720><c> know,</c>

00:12:44.310 --> 00:12:44.320 align:start position:0%
you know,
 

00:12:44.320 --> 00:12:47.750 align:start position:0%
you know,
um<00:12:45.680><c> I</c><00:12:46.000><c> I</c><00:12:46.240><c> I'</c><00:12:46.399><c> I've</c><00:12:46.800><c> already</c><00:12:47.120><c> stated</c><00:12:47.519><c> my</c>

00:12:47.750 --> 00:12:47.760 align:start position:0%
um I I I' I've already stated my
 

00:12:47.760 --> 00:12:49.509 align:start position:0%
um I I I' I've already stated my
position

00:12:49.509 --> 00:12:49.519 align:start position:0%
position
 

00:12:49.519 --> 00:12:53.350 align:start position:0%
position
in<00:12:49.760><c> the</c><00:12:49.920><c> last</c><00:12:50.160><c> video.</c><00:12:51.440><c> Um</c>

00:12:53.350 --> 00:12:53.360 align:start position:0%
in the last video. Um
 

00:12:53.360 --> 00:12:56.550 align:start position:0%
in the last video. Um
I<00:12:53.680><c> think</c><00:12:53.839><c> complexity</c><00:12:54.480><c> compounds</c><00:12:55.519><c> and</c><00:12:56.320><c> a</c>

00:12:56.550 --> 00:12:56.560 align:start position:0%
I think complexity compounds and a
 

00:12:56.560 --> 00:12:58.230 align:start position:0%
I think complexity compounds and a
codebase<00:12:57.040><c> like</c><00:12:57.200><c> that</c><00:12:57.440><c> will</c><00:12:57.680><c> get</c><00:12:57.839><c> harder</c><00:12:58.079><c> and</c>

00:12:58.230 --> 00:12:58.240 align:start position:0%
codebase like that will get harder and
 

00:12:58.240 --> 00:13:02.230 align:start position:0%
codebase like that will get harder and
harder<00:12:58.720><c> to</c><00:12:59.440><c> maintain</c><00:13:00.000><c> over</c><00:13:00.639><c> over</c><00:13:01.040><c> time,</c><00:13:02.000><c> even</c>

00:13:02.230 --> 00:13:02.240 align:start position:0%
harder to maintain over over time, even
 

00:13:02.240 --> 00:13:06.710 align:start position:0%
harder to maintain over over time, even
by<00:13:02.800><c> frontier</c><00:13:03.360><c> AI</c><00:13:03.760><c> models.</c>

00:13:06.710 --> 00:13:06.720 align:start position:0%
by frontier AI models.
 

00:13:06.720 --> 00:13:09.430 align:start position:0%
by frontier AI models.
But<00:13:07.279><c> that's</c><00:13:07.519><c> all</c><00:13:07.839><c> theory.</c>

00:13:09.430 --> 00:13:09.440 align:start position:0%
But that's all theory.
 

00:13:09.440 --> 00:13:12.629 align:start position:0%
But that's all theory.
I<00:13:09.680><c> have</c><00:13:09.839><c> to</c><00:13:10.079><c> hand</c><00:13:10.240><c> it</c><00:13:10.399><c> to</c><00:13:10.560><c> them</c><00:13:11.120><c> because</c><00:13:12.399><c> the</c>

00:13:12.629 --> 00:13:12.639 align:start position:0%
I have to hand it to them because the
 

00:13:12.639 --> 00:13:15.509 align:start position:0%
I have to hand it to them because the
bun<00:13:13.040><c> team</c><00:13:13.200><c> is</c><00:13:14.000><c> um</c>

00:13:15.509 --> 00:13:15.519 align:start position:0%
bun team is um
 

00:13:15.519 --> 00:13:18.470 align:start position:0%
bun team is um
is<00:13:15.760><c> is</c><00:13:16.000><c> fearlessly</c><00:13:17.120><c> marching</c><00:13:17.519><c> forward</c><00:13:17.920><c> here</c>

00:13:18.470 --> 00:13:18.480 align:start position:0%
is is fearlessly marching forward here
 

00:13:18.480 --> 00:13:20.310 align:start position:0%
is is fearlessly marching forward here
and<00:13:18.880><c> we're</c><00:13:19.120><c> all</c><00:13:19.279><c> going</c><00:13:19.360><c> to</c><00:13:19.519><c> benefit</c><00:13:19.839><c> from</c><00:13:20.079><c> this</c>

00:13:20.310 --> 00:13:20.320 align:start position:0%
and we're all going to benefit from this
 

00:13:20.320 --> 00:13:22.069 align:start position:0%
and we're all going to benefit from this
as<00:13:20.560><c> a</c>

00:13:22.069 --> 00:13:22.079 align:start position:0%
as a
 

00:13:22.079 --> 00:13:24.710 align:start position:0%
as a
test<00:13:22.399><c> case,</c><00:13:23.519><c> you</c><00:13:23.680><c> know.</c><00:13:24.000><c> So,</c><00:13:24.240><c> I</c><00:13:24.399><c> got</c><00:13:24.480><c> to</c><00:13:24.560><c> give</c>

00:13:24.710 --> 00:13:24.720 align:start position:0%
test case, you know. So, I got to give
 

00:13:24.720 --> 00:13:27.990 align:start position:0%
test case, you know. So, I got to give
him<00:13:24.880><c> props</c><00:13:25.120><c> for</c><00:13:25.360><c> that.</c><00:13:26.720><c> Um</c><00:13:27.120><c> I</c><00:13:27.360><c> I'm</c><00:13:27.680><c> going</c><00:13:27.839><c> to</c>

00:13:27.990 --> 00:13:28.000 align:start position:0%
him props for that. Um I I'm going to
 

00:13:28.000 --> 00:13:29.590 align:start position:0%
him props for that. Um I I'm going to
pay<00:13:28.160><c> attention.</c><00:13:28.800><c> I</c><00:13:28.959><c> want</c><00:13:29.120><c> to</c><00:13:29.279><c> see</c><00:13:29.360><c> what</c>

00:13:29.590 --> 00:13:29.600 align:start position:0%
pay attention. I want to see what
 

00:13:29.600 --> 00:13:31.350 align:start position:0%
pay attention. I want to see what
happens.

00:13:31.350 --> 00:13:31.360 align:start position:0%
happens.
 

00:13:31.360 --> 00:13:34.069 align:start position:0%
happens.
Um,

00:13:34.069 --> 00:13:34.079 align:start position:0%
Um,
 

00:13:34.079 --> 00:13:35.829 align:start position:0%
Um,
if<00:13:34.320><c> anything,</c>

00:13:35.829 --> 00:13:35.839 align:start position:0%
if anything,
 

00:13:35.839 --> 00:13:37.750 align:start position:0%
if anything,
I<00:13:36.079><c> just</c><00:13:36.240><c> want</c><00:13:36.480><c> people</c><00:13:36.639><c> to</c><00:13:36.880><c> talk</c><00:13:37.120><c> about</c>

00:13:37.750 --> 00:13:37.760 align:start position:0%
I just want people to talk about
 

00:13:37.760 --> 00:13:41.509 align:start position:0%
I just want people to talk about
simplicity<00:13:38.639><c> and</c><00:13:38.959><c> complexity</c><00:13:39.680><c> a</c><00:13:40.000><c> lot</c><00:13:40.160><c> more.</c>

00:13:41.509 --> 00:13:41.519 align:start position:0%
simplicity and complexity a lot more.
 

00:13:41.519 --> 00:13:44.069 align:start position:0%
simplicity and complexity a lot more.
And<00:13:41.920><c> maybe</c><00:13:42.160><c> this</c><00:13:42.399><c> will</c><00:13:42.639><c> trigger</c><00:13:43.440><c> that</c><00:13:43.760><c> kind</c><00:13:43.920><c> of</c>

00:13:44.069 --> 00:13:44.079 align:start position:0%
And maybe this will trigger that kind of
 

00:13:44.079 --> 00:13:45.910 align:start position:0%
And maybe this will trigger that kind of
discussion<00:13:44.560><c> a</c><00:13:44.880><c> lot</c><00:13:44.959><c> more</c><00:13:45.360><c> because</c><00:13:45.680><c> people</c>

00:13:45.910 --> 00:13:45.920 align:start position:0%
discussion a lot more because people
 

00:13:45.920 --> 00:13:47.910 align:start position:0%
discussion a lot more because people
just<00:13:46.160><c> don't</c><00:13:46.399><c> talk</c><00:13:46.639><c> about</c><00:13:46.800><c> it</c><00:13:46.959><c> enough</c><00:13:47.440><c> in</c><00:13:47.680><c> our</c>

00:13:47.910 --> 00:13:47.920 align:start position:0%
just don't talk about it enough in our
 

00:13:47.920 --> 00:13:50.870 align:start position:0%
just don't talk about it enough in our
field.<00:13:48.880><c> They</c><00:13:49.120><c> they</c><00:13:49.519><c> barely</c><00:13:50.240><c> understand</c><00:13:50.720><c> what</c>

00:13:50.870 --> 00:13:50.880 align:start position:0%
field. They they barely understand what
 

00:13:50.880 --> 00:13:54.949 align:start position:0%
field. They they barely understand what
it<00:13:51.120><c> even</c><00:13:51.360><c> means.</c><00:13:52.800><c> Um,</c><00:13:53.200><c> but</c><00:13:53.519><c> we're</c><00:13:53.760><c> we're</c>

00:13:54.949 --> 00:13:54.959 align:start position:0%
it even means. Um, but we're we're
 

00:13:54.959 --> 00:13:59.750 align:start position:0%
it even means. Um, but we're we're
rapidly<00:13:55.680><c> reaching</c><00:13:56.079><c> a</c><00:13:56.399><c> point</c><00:13:56.720><c> where</c><00:13:57.839><c> um</c><00:13:58.959><c> you</c>

00:13:59.750 --> 00:13:59.760 align:start position:0%
rapidly reaching a point where um you
 

00:13:59.760 --> 00:14:02.710 align:start position:0%
rapidly reaching a point where um you
you<00:14:00.160><c> have</c><00:14:00.320><c> to</c><00:14:00.480><c> talk</c><00:14:00.639><c> about</c><00:14:00.800><c> it</c>

00:14:02.710 --> 00:14:02.720 align:start position:0%
you have to talk about it
 

00:14:02.720 --> 00:14:05.269 align:start position:0%
you have to talk about it
a<00:14:03.040><c> million</c><00:14:03.360><c> [&nbsp;__&nbsp;]</c><00:14:03.760><c> lines.</c><00:14:04.639><c> Are</c><00:14:04.880><c> you</c><00:14:04.959><c> kidding</c>

00:14:05.269 --> 00:14:05.279 align:start position:0%
a million [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] lines. Are you kidding
 

00:14:05.279 --> 00:14:13.189 align:start position:0%
a million [&nbsp;__&nbsp;] lines. Are you kidding
me?

00:14:13.189 --> 00:14:13.199 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:14:13.199 --> 00:14:14.710 align:start position:0%
 
Yeah.

00:14:14.710 --> 00:14:14.720 align:start position:0%
Yeah.
 

00:14:14.720 --> 00:14:18.710 align:start position:0%
Yeah.
Well,<00:14:16.000><c> um</c>

00:14:18.710 --> 00:14:18.720 align:start position:0%
Well, um
 

00:14:18.720 --> 00:14:21.430 align:start position:0%
Well, um
we'll<00:14:18.959><c> see</c><00:14:19.040><c> if</c><00:14:19.199><c> I</c><00:14:19.360><c> turn</c><00:14:19.519><c> out</c><00:14:19.680><c> to</c><00:14:19.839><c> be</c><00:14:20.000><c> right.</c>

00:14:21.430 --> 00:14:21.440 align:start position:0%
we'll see if I turn out to be right.
 

00:14:21.440 --> 00:14:25.600 align:start position:0%
we'll see if I turn out to be right.
If<00:14:21.760><c> not,</c><00:14:22.000><c> then</c><00:14:22.560><c> screw</c><00:14:22.959><c> me.</c>

