I now have
a TikTok
platform of
over 280,000
And the
that I'm
now witnessing,
especially in
my Instagram
comments,
especially after
my 911 video,
maps directly
onto leaked
government
training programs.
It's called the
Manufactured Doubt
strategy
and there's
a lot of research
done on this.
It's mostly used
by Big Tobacco
and fossil fuels.
It's entering
into my
community
because
I've been
trying to
talk about
communism.
My bad.
I'm not
shooting from the hip
on this.
I could do
a whole video
on how
MI5 used to
infiltrate
the IRA
I will do
that video.
Actually,
This is a PDF
Edward Snowden
copied out of
NSA systems
in 2013.
This is a
50 page
internal
Powerpoint
presentation
created by
someone at
GCHQ
in the UK.
If you're
not aware,
GCHQ
stands for
Government
Communications
Headquarters.
Before I
get into
the actual
content
of this
document,
I need to
professional
observation
as a Communications
Specialist.
An agency
whose name is
Government
Communications
produced
these graphs.
Anyway,
the quality
of the comms hq
comms division
is not
here for.
But it is
ugly as shit.
I would also say there's probably another few videos for me
in just
deep diving
into these
Snowden materials.
But this document
was called
‘The Art of Deception
Training for
a New Generation
of Online
Covert Operations’.
It was created
Human Science
Operation cell.
And I'm getting
closer to
establishing who
our clip artist
is
because
although
the name
is redacted,
the presenter
of this presentation
Human Science.
Every single page
of this document
contains these
classification markings,
meaning
top secret
and only
supposed to
be released to
people within
the Five Eyes
Network.
Glenn Greenwald
was the first person
to report on
these documents
through
NBC News
in February 2014.
So shout out
to them.
And the full document
was published
by Greenwald
both to
the intercept
and to his own
publication
back in 2014.
The ACLU
and the
Electronic
Frontier Foundation
also host
copies on
their own
separate servers.
A document
that multiple
journalists,
multiple
civil rights
institutions
and multiple
foundations
and NGOs
think is
important enough
to host copies on
their own servers
is a document
you may
wanna read.
These are their 10 principles.
The first one is flattery.
And I am seeing so much of this
because I made a hard rule that I would not tolerate aggression
because
I've said publicly
that comments
that attack me
directly
get removed
immediately.
The approach
now needs to be
more sophisticated,
but it's not
that sophisticated
because it's still
heavily templated.
And so now I get a lot of comments that are like,
“I usually like her content, but….”
that is designed
to build
false rapport
with me
and with
the commenters
rather than
directly attacking
the creator
and having
her audience
defend her
or the creator
block you.
They act like
they've always
been here
and they're
part of the
community,
and they
generally agree
but this
they have
“more expertise” on,
which is the second thing you'll see a lot of:
“Having researched Lenin
for 20 years”,
“having lived
in Venezuela”.
If one person does these two things,
the audience might think
“whatever”
But when you get
multiple accounts,
the ‘herd’
reinforcing
that position
with slightly
different wording,
the audience,
who is not trained
to think critically
about intelligence
campaigns
in TikTok
comments,
scrolls with
an abstract feeling
that that video
might not be
entirely correct.
And these
comments
look very different
to what would
genuinely happen
if I made
a genuine mistake
with a detail
and actual experts
picked it up.
A genuine expert
finding a genuine
mistake
says something
genuine.
Usually simple,
often very blunt.
Just like
“ it's a 5,
not a 6”
“It was in 24 not 25”
“I've sent you
an email
about this”.
Usually
they rarely
announce that
“fans of
the channel”.
“Trust me guys,
I'm not
being antagonistic.
I watch
her video
all the time.
I just don't
agree with it”
Red flag.
This one
has absolutely
triggered me
in a way
that I would
consider
ableist and
abusive,
because
the autistic brain
specifically
finds it harder
to ignore
these kinds
of traps.
But I've learnt
I've learnt
that their
real goal
is this
instead of
spending my time
making the
next part
of the video,
I would
spend my time
replying to
this bullshit
instead.
That is
their goal.
Once you
understand that,
you stop
replying.
Time is your
most valuable
asset.
By playing
with the timeline,
either by
creating urgency
“we're gonna
bomb Iran”,
“why aren't you
talking about it?”
Or delay
getting you
to focus on
something else
not your purpose
is a strategy
Then, deception,
dishonesty,
needy and greedy.
Lot of these
comments
will assert things
without any
evidence.
continually
demand sources
from me
and multiple times
I've experienced them
going to
other platforms
and trying to
smear me,
which is
defamation,
so be careful
including
being called
“a racist”
for reporting on
the Super Bowl.
Then
need and greed.
They know
money.
People like
validation.
They want
their audience
to grow.
They will
exploit that.
I'm running
out of time,
but I’m gonna
documents
in the discord.
And I will
continue to
block people
that engage
with me
in bad faith.