WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:02.149 align:start position:0%
 
I<00:00:00.320><c> have</c><00:00:00.400><c> an</c><00:00:00.640><c> extremely</c><00:00:01.360><c> important</c><00:00:01.920><c> question</c>

00:00:02.149 --> 00:00:02.159 align:start position:0%
I have an extremely important question
 

00:00:02.159 --> 00:00:03.830 align:start position:0%
I have an extremely important question
for<00:00:02.320><c> you.</c><00:00:02.639><c> What's</c><00:00:02.800><c> the</c><00:00:03.040><c> appropriate</c><00:00:03.360><c> exchange</c>

00:00:03.830 --> 00:00:03.840 align:start position:0%
for you. What's the appropriate exchange
 

00:00:03.840 --> 00:00:05.590 align:start position:0%
for you. What's the appropriate exchange
rate<00:00:04.160><c> between</c><00:00:04.480><c> our</c><00:00:04.720><c> engineering</c><00:00:05.200><c> team's</c>

00:00:05.590 --> 00:00:05.600 align:start position:0%
rate between our engineering team's
 

00:00:05.600 --> 00:00:07.430 align:start position:0%
rate between our engineering team's
story<00:00:05.920><c> points</c><00:00:06.319><c> and</c><00:00:06.560><c> the</c><00:00:06.799><c> marketing</c><00:00:07.120><c> team's</c>

00:00:07.430 --> 00:00:07.440 align:start position:0%
story points and the marketing team's
 

00:00:07.440 --> 00:00:09.270 align:start position:0%
story points and the marketing team's
campaign<00:00:07.839><c> impression</c><00:00:08.320><c> when</c><00:00:08.639><c> doing</c><00:00:08.880><c> crossf</c>

00:00:09.270 --> 00:00:09.280 align:start position:0%
campaign impression when doing crossf
 

00:00:09.280 --> 00:00:11.190 align:start position:0%
campaign impression when doing crossf
functional<00:00:09.760><c> resource</c><00:00:10.160><c> allocation?</c><00:00:10.800><c> Oh,</c><00:00:10.960><c> was</c>

00:00:11.190 --> 00:00:11.200 align:start position:0%
functional resource allocation? Oh, was
 

00:00:11.200 --> 00:00:12.390 align:start position:0%
functional resource allocation? Oh, was
that<00:00:11.360><c> question</c><00:00:11.599><c> too</c><00:00:11.840><c> hard</c><00:00:12.000><c> for</c><00:00:12.160><c> you</c><00:00:12.240><c> to</c>

00:00:12.390 --> 00:00:12.400 align:start position:0%
that question too hard for you to
 

00:00:12.400 --> 00:00:13.910 align:start position:0%
that question too hard for you to
answer?<00:00:12.800><c> Well,</c><00:00:12.960><c> how</c><00:00:13.120><c> about</c><00:00:13.280><c> this</c><00:00:13.440><c> one?</c><00:00:13.679><c> The</c>

00:00:13.910 --> 00:00:13.920 align:start position:0%
answer? Well, how about this one? The
 

00:00:13.920 --> 00:00:15.509 align:start position:0%
answer? Well, how about this one? The
fire<00:00:14.240><c> safety</c><00:00:14.559><c> code</c><00:00:14.799><c> for</c><00:00:14.960><c> our</c><00:00:15.120><c> restaurant</c>

00:00:15.509 --> 00:00:15.519 align:start position:0%
fire safety code for our restaurant
 

00:00:15.519 --> 00:00:17.590 align:start position:0%
fire safety code for our restaurant
kitchen<00:00:15.839><c> was</c><00:00:16.080><c> just</c><00:00:16.320><c> updated.</c><00:00:17.039><c> How</c><00:00:17.199><c> should</c><00:00:17.359><c> we</c>

00:00:17.590 --> 00:00:17.600 align:start position:0%
kitchen was just updated. How should we
 

00:00:17.600 --> 00:00:19.910 align:start position:0%
kitchen was just updated. How should we
reformulate<00:00:18.240><c> our</c><00:00:18.560><c> signature</c><00:00:19.039><c> curries</c><00:00:19.520><c> spice</c>

00:00:19.910 --> 00:00:19.920 align:start position:0%
reformulate our signature curries spice
 

00:00:19.920 --> 00:00:21.670 align:start position:0%
reformulate our signature curries spice
blend<00:00:20.240><c> to</c><00:00:20.400><c> stay</c><00:00:20.640><c> compliant?</c><00:00:21.279><c> And</c><00:00:21.439><c> which</c>

00:00:21.670 --> 00:00:21.680 align:start position:0%
blend to stay compliant? And which
 

00:00:21.680 --> 00:00:23.509 align:start position:0%
blend to stay compliant? And which
ingredients<00:00:22.240><c> are</c><00:00:22.560><c> most</c><00:00:22.880><c> effective?</c><00:00:23.279><c> Now,</c>

00:00:23.509 --> 00:00:23.519 align:start position:0%
ingredients are most effective? Now,
 

00:00:23.519 --> 00:00:24.950 align:start position:0%
ingredients are most effective? Now,
you're<00:00:23.840><c> probably</c><00:00:24.160><c> thinking</c><00:00:24.480><c> when</c><00:00:24.720><c> you</c><00:00:24.800><c> hear</c>

00:00:24.950 --> 00:00:24.960 align:start position:0%
you're probably thinking when you hear
 

00:00:24.960 --> 00:00:26.870 align:start position:0%
you're probably thinking when you hear
that,<00:00:25.119><c> "Man,</c><00:00:25.519><c> that</c><00:00:25.760><c> sounds</c><00:00:26.000><c> like</c><00:00:26.160><c> a</c><00:00:26.400><c> just</c><00:00:26.640><c> a</c>

00:00:26.870 --> 00:00:26.880 align:start position:0%
that, "Man, that sounds like a just a
 

00:00:26.880 --> 00:00:29.269 align:start position:0%
that, "Man, that sounds like a just a
mouthful<00:00:27.439><c> of</c><00:00:27.680><c> bullshit."</c><00:00:28.480><c> which</c><00:00:28.720><c> is</c><00:00:28.880><c> a</c>

00:00:29.269 --> 00:00:29.279 align:start position:0%
mouthful of bullshit." which is a
 

00:00:29.279 --> 00:00:31.589 align:start position:0%
mouthful of bullshit." which is a
horrifying<00:00:30.080><c> image</c><00:00:30.400><c> to</c><00:00:30.640><c> put</c><00:00:30.800><c> into</c><00:00:31.039><c> my</c><00:00:31.199><c> head.</c>

00:00:31.589 --> 00:00:31.599 align:start position:0%
horrifying image to put into my head.
 

00:00:31.599 --> 00:00:33.750 align:start position:0%
horrifying image to put into my head.
But<00:00:32.079><c> if</c><00:00:32.320><c> you</c><00:00:32.480><c> did</c><00:00:32.719><c> think</c><00:00:32.880><c> that,</c><00:00:33.360><c> you're</c>

00:00:33.750 --> 00:00:33.760 align:start position:0%
But if you did think that, you're
 

00:00:33.760 --> 00:00:36.310 align:start position:0%
But if you did think that, you're
absolutely<00:00:34.399><c> correct.</c><00:00:34.880><c> And</c><00:00:35.200><c> welcome</c><00:00:35.600><c> to</c><00:00:35.920><c> the</c>

00:00:36.310 --> 00:00:36.320 align:start position:0%
absolutely correct. And welcome to the
 

00:00:36.320 --> 00:00:39.190 align:start position:0%
absolutely correct. And welcome to the
 bench.<00:00:38.079><c> Models</c><00:00:38.640><c> answering</c>

00:00:39.190 --> 00:00:39.200 align:start position:0%
 bench. Models answering
 

00:00:39.200 --> 00:00:40.790 align:start position:0%
 bench. Models answering
nonsense<00:00:39.760><c> questions.</c><00:00:40.320><c> Now,</c><00:00:40.559><c> there's</c>

00:00:40.790 --> 00:00:40.800 align:start position:0%
nonsense questions. Now, there's
 

00:00:40.800 --> 00:00:42.389 align:start position:0%
nonsense questions. Now, there's
actually<00:00:41.040><c> some</c><00:00:41.360><c> really</c><00:00:41.840><c> interesting</c>

00:00:42.389 --> 00:00:42.399 align:start position:0%
actually some really interesting
 

00:00:42.399 --> 00:00:44.630 align:start position:0%
actually some really interesting
implications<00:00:43.120><c> to</c><00:00:43.360><c> this</c><00:00:43.600><c> whole</c><00:00:43.840><c> thing.</c><00:00:44.239><c> Also,</c>

00:00:44.630 --> 00:00:44.640 align:start position:0%
implications to this whole thing. Also,
 

00:00:44.640 --> 00:00:46.389 align:start position:0%
implications to this whole thing. Also,
just<00:00:44.879><c> hilarious</c><00:00:45.360><c> to</c><00:00:45.520><c> look</c><00:00:45.600><c> at.</c><00:00:45.840><c> So,</c><00:00:46.079><c> we</c><00:00:46.239><c> will</c>

00:00:46.389 --> 00:00:46.399 align:start position:0%
just hilarious to look at. So, we will
 

00:00:46.399 --> 00:00:47.990 align:start position:0%
just hilarious to look at. So, we will
look<00:00:46.559><c> at</c><00:00:46.719><c> some</c><00:00:46.879><c> of</c><00:00:47.039><c> the</c><00:00:47.200><c> answers</c><00:00:47.520><c> to</c><00:00:47.760><c> the</c>

00:00:47.990 --> 00:00:48.000 align:start position:0%
look at some of the answers to the
 

00:00:48.000 --> 00:00:49.670 align:start position:0%
look at some of the answers to the
questions.<00:00:48.480><c> We'll</c><00:00:48.719><c> see</c><00:00:48.879><c> which</c><00:00:49.120><c> models</c><00:00:49.520><c> are</c>

00:00:49.670 --> 00:00:49.680 align:start position:0%
questions. We'll see which models are
 

00:00:49.680 --> 00:00:51.190 align:start position:0%
questions. We'll see which models are
horrible.<00:00:50.079><c> But</c><00:00:50.239><c> more</c><00:00:50.399><c> interestingly,</c><00:00:51.039><c> what</c>

00:00:51.190 --> 00:00:51.200 align:start position:0%
horrible. But more interestingly, what
 

00:00:51.200 --> 00:00:53.189 align:start position:0%
horrible. But more interestingly, what
does<00:00:51.360><c> it</c><00:00:51.520><c> even</c><00:00:51.840><c> mean</c><00:00:52.000><c> that</c><00:00:52.239><c> the</c><00:00:52.480><c> fire</c><00:00:52.800><c> code</c><00:00:53.039><c> and</c>

00:00:53.189 --> 00:00:53.199 align:start position:0%
does it even mean that the fire code and
 

00:00:53.199 --> 00:00:55.110 align:start position:0%
does it even mean that the fire code and
the<00:00:53.280><c> curry</c><00:00:53.600><c> are</c><00:00:53.840><c> related?</c><00:00:54.320><c> So,</c><00:00:54.480><c> first</c><00:00:54.640><c> of</c><00:00:54.800><c> all,</c>

00:00:55.110 --> 00:00:55.120 align:start position:0%
the curry are related? So, first of all,
 

00:00:55.120 --> 00:00:57.189 align:start position:0%
the curry are related? So, first of all,
what<00:00:55.360><c> is</c><00:00:55.600><c> this</c><00:00:55.840><c> test?</c><00:00:56.160><c> So,</c><00:00:56.320><c> the</c><00:00:56.480><c> test</c><00:00:56.800><c> asks</c>

00:00:57.189 --> 00:00:57.199 align:start position:0%
what is this test? So, the test asks
 

00:00:57.199 --> 00:00:58.950 align:start position:0%
what is this test? So, the test asks
this<00:00:58.000><c> question</c><00:00:58.239><c> like</c><00:00:58.399><c> the</c><00:00:58.559><c> ones</c><00:00:58.800><c> I</c>

00:00:58.950 --> 00:00:58.960 align:start position:0%
this question like the ones I
 

00:00:58.960 --> 00:01:01.029 align:start position:0%
this question like the ones I
just<00:00:59.120><c> asked</c><00:00:59.359><c> you</c><00:00:59.760><c> and</c><00:01:00.000><c> then</c><00:01:00.239><c> either</c><00:01:00.480><c> the</c><00:01:00.719><c> model</c>

00:01:01.029 --> 00:01:01.039 align:start position:0%
just asked you and then either the model
 

00:01:01.039 --> 00:01:02.630 align:start position:0%
just asked you and then either the model
will<00:01:01.199><c> push</c><00:01:01.440><c> back</c><00:01:01.600><c> and</c><00:01:01.760><c> say,</c><00:01:01.920><c> "Hey,</c><00:01:02.320><c> these</c>

00:01:02.630 --> 00:01:02.640 align:start position:0%
will push back and say, "Hey, these
 

00:01:02.640 --> 00:01:04.710 align:start position:0%
will push back and say, "Hey, these
things<00:01:02.879><c> aren't</c><00:01:03.280><c> related.</c><00:01:03.840><c> I</c><00:01:04.159><c> can't</c><00:01:04.400><c> answer</c>

00:01:04.710 --> 00:01:04.720 align:start position:0%
things aren't related. I can't answer
 

00:01:04.720 --> 00:01:06.950 align:start position:0%
things aren't related. I can't answer
this<00:01:05.040><c> question</c><00:01:05.519><c> or</c><00:01:05.920><c> they</c><00:01:06.159><c> will</c><00:01:06.479><c> partially</c>

00:01:06.950 --> 00:01:06.960 align:start position:0%
this question or they will partially
 

00:01:06.960 --> 00:01:08.630 align:start position:0%
this question or they will partially
push<00:01:07.200><c> back</c><00:01:07.520><c> that</c><00:01:07.680><c> gives</c><00:01:07.840><c> that</c><00:01:08.080><c> earns</c><00:01:08.320><c> them</c><00:01:08.479><c> a</c>

00:01:08.630 --> 00:01:08.640 align:start position:0%
push back that gives that earns them a
 

00:01:08.640 --> 00:01:10.469 align:start position:0%
push back that gives that earns them a
yellow<00:01:09.119><c> or</c><00:01:09.439><c> they'll</c><00:01:09.680><c> just</c><00:01:09.840><c> say,</c><00:01:10.000><c> "Hey,</c><00:01:10.320><c> I'm</c>

00:01:10.469 --> 00:01:10.479 align:start position:0%
yellow or they'll just say, "Hey, I'm
 

00:01:10.479 --> 00:01:11.590 align:start position:0%
yellow or they'll just say, "Hey, I'm
going<00:01:10.560><c> to</c><00:01:10.720><c> answer</c><00:01:10.960><c> this</c><00:01:11.119><c> question.</c><00:01:11.439><c> Don't</c>

00:01:11.590 --> 00:01:11.600 align:start position:0%
going to answer this question. Don't
 

00:01:11.600 --> 00:01:12.950 align:start position:0%
going to answer this question. Don't
worry,<00:01:11.840><c> I'll</c><00:01:12.000><c> I'll</c><00:01:12.320><c> come</c><00:01:12.479><c> up</c><00:01:12.640><c> with</c><00:01:12.720><c> the</c>

00:01:12.950 --> 00:01:12.960 align:start position:0%
worry, I'll I'll come up with the
 

00:01:12.960 --> 00:01:14.310 align:start position:0%
worry, I'll I'll come up with the
solution."<00:01:13.280><c> So,</c><00:01:13.520><c> the</c><00:01:13.680><c> first</c><00:01:13.840><c> kind</c><00:01:14.000><c> of</c><00:01:14.080><c> big</c>

00:01:14.310 --> 00:01:14.320 align:start position:0%
solution." So, the first kind of big
 

00:01:14.320 --> 00:01:17.190 align:start position:0%
solution." So, the first kind of big
surprising<00:01:14.799><c> takeaway</c><00:01:15.520><c> is</c><00:01:15.840><c> that</c><00:01:16.159><c> Claude,</c><00:01:16.880><c> the</c>

00:01:17.190 --> 00:01:17.200 align:start position:0%
surprising takeaway is that Claude, the
 

00:01:17.200 --> 00:01:19.990 align:start position:0%
surprising takeaway is that Claude, the
new<00:01:17.439><c> models</c><00:01:17.759><c> on</c><00:01:18.000><c> Claude,</c><00:01:18.799><c> they're</c><00:01:19.119><c> all</c><00:01:19.600><c> pretty</c>

00:01:19.990 --> 00:01:20.000 align:start position:0%
new models on Claude, they're all pretty
 

00:01:20.000 --> 00:01:22.149 align:start position:0%
new models on Claude, they're all pretty
good.<00:01:20.560><c> They</c><00:01:20.720><c> they</c><00:01:21.119><c> generally</c><00:01:21.520><c> just</c><00:01:21.759><c> don't</c><00:01:22.000><c> put</c>

00:01:22.149 --> 00:01:22.159 align:start position:0%
good. They they generally just don't put
 

00:01:22.159 --> 00:01:23.990 align:start position:0%
good. They they generally just don't put
up<00:01:22.320><c> with</c><00:01:22.479><c> any</c><00:01:23.280><c> Okay?</c><00:01:23.520><c> you</c><00:01:23.759><c> come</c><00:01:23.840><c> in</c>

00:01:23.990 --> 00:01:24.000 align:start position:0%
up with any Okay? you come in
 

00:01:24.000 --> 00:01:25.590 align:start position:0%
up with any Okay? you come in
here<00:01:24.080><c> and</c><00:01:24.240><c> you</c><00:01:24.479><c> ask</c><00:01:24.640><c> a</c><00:01:24.799><c> nonsense</c><00:01:25.280><c> question,</c>

00:01:25.590 --> 00:01:25.600 align:start position:0%
here and you ask a nonsense question,
 

00:01:25.600 --> 00:01:28.310 align:start position:0%
here and you ask a nonsense question,
it's<00:01:25.840><c> going</c><00:01:25.920><c> to</c><00:01:26.000><c> say</c><00:01:26.320><c> no</c><00:01:27.439><c> thank</c><00:01:27.680><c> you.</c><00:01:28.000><c> Also</c>

00:01:28.310 --> 00:01:28.320 align:start position:0%
it's going to say no thank you. Also
 

00:01:28.320 --> 00:01:29.830 align:start position:0%
it's going to say no thank you. Also
kind<00:01:28.479><c> of</c><00:01:28.560><c> interesting</c><00:01:28.799><c> is</c><00:01:29.040><c> that</c><00:01:29.280><c> high</c><00:01:29.680><c> like</c>

00:01:29.830 --> 00:01:29.840 align:start position:0%
kind of interesting is that high like
 

00:01:29.840 --> 00:01:31.670 align:start position:0%
kind of interesting is that high like
the<00:01:29.920><c> the</c><00:01:30.240><c> ranking</c><00:01:30.560><c> of</c><00:01:30.720><c> high</c><00:01:31.040><c> doesn't</c><00:01:31.280><c> seem</c><00:01:31.520><c> to</c>

00:01:31.670 --> 00:01:31.680 align:start position:0%
the the ranking of high doesn't seem to
 

00:01:31.680 --> 00:01:33.990 align:start position:0%
the the ranking of high doesn't seem to
make<00:01:31.920><c> any</c><00:01:32.240><c> sort</c><00:01:32.479><c> of</c><00:01:32.640><c> like</c><00:01:32.960><c> indication</c><00:01:33.600><c> into</c>

00:01:33.990 --> 00:01:34.000 align:start position:0%
make any sort of like indication into
 

00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:35.270 align:start position:0%
make any sort of like indication into
whether<00:01:34.240><c> or</c><00:01:34.400><c> not</c><00:01:34.560><c> it's</c><00:01:34.799><c> going</c><00:01:34.880><c> to</c><00:01:34.960><c> perform</c>

00:01:35.270 --> 00:01:35.280 align:start position:0%
whether or not it's going to perform
 

00:01:35.280 --> 00:01:37.910 align:start position:0%
whether or not it's going to perform
better,<00:01:35.759><c> right?</c><00:01:35.920><c> Cuz</c><00:01:36.159><c> set</c><00:01:36.640><c> 46</c><00:01:37.200><c> outperforms</c>

00:01:37.910 --> 00:01:37.920 align:start position:0%
better, right? Cuz set 46 outperforms
 

00:01:37.920 --> 00:01:41.429 align:start position:0%
better, right? Cuz set 46 outperforms
opus<00:01:38.400><c> 46</c><00:01:38.880><c> which</c><00:01:39.119><c> outperforms</c><00:01:39.680><c> sonnet</c><00:01:40.159><c> high</c><00:01:40.960><c> 46</c>

00:01:41.429 --> 00:01:41.439 align:start position:0%
opus 46 which outperforms sonnet high 46
 

00:01:41.439 --> 00:01:44.469 align:start position:0%
opus 46 which outperforms sonnet high 46
which<00:01:41.600><c> which</c><00:01:41.840><c> outperforms</c><00:01:42.479><c> claude</c><00:01:42.880><c> opus</c><00:01:43.600><c> 45</c>

00:01:44.469 --> 00:01:44.479 align:start position:0%
which which outperforms claude opus 45
 

00:01:44.479 --> 00:01:46.069 align:start position:0%
which which outperforms claude opus 45
high.<00:01:44.880><c> It's</c><00:01:45.040><c> just</c><00:01:45.200><c> weird,</c><00:01:45.520><c> right?</c><00:01:45.759><c> But</c><00:01:45.920><c> this</c>

00:01:46.069 --> 00:01:46.079 align:start position:0%
high. It's just weird, right? But this
 

00:01:46.079 --> 00:01:47.749 align:start position:0%
high. It's just weird, right? But this
isn't<00:01:46.399><c> that</c><00:01:46.799><c> surprising.</c><00:01:47.280><c> I</c><00:01:47.520><c> know</c><00:01:47.600><c> that</c>

00:01:47.749 --> 00:01:47.759 align:start position:0%
isn't that surprising. I know that
 

00:01:47.759 --> 00:01:50.149 align:start position:0%
isn't that surprising. I know that
Anthropic<00:01:48.399><c> has</c><00:01:48.560><c> been</c><00:01:48.960><c> rather</c><00:01:49.360><c> sensitive</c><00:01:49.920><c> to</c>

00:01:50.149 --> 00:01:50.159 align:start position:0%
Anthropic has been rather sensitive to
 

00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:52.389 align:start position:0%
Anthropic has been rather sensitive to
the<00:01:50.399><c> AI</c><00:01:50.799><c> psychosis</c><00:01:51.520><c> thing</c><00:01:51.759><c> and</c><00:01:52.000><c> of</c><00:01:52.240><c> the</c>

00:01:52.389 --> 00:01:52.399 align:start position:0%
the AI psychosis thing and of the
 

00:01:52.399 --> 00:01:54.230 align:start position:0%
the AI psychosis thing and of the
studies<00:01:52.720><c> that</c><00:01:52.880><c> have</c><00:01:53.119><c> come</c><00:01:53.200><c> out,</c><00:01:53.439><c> even</c><00:01:53.680><c> Dr.</c><00:01:54.000><c> K</c>

00:01:54.230 --> 00:01:54.240 align:start position:0%
studies that have come out, even Dr. K
 

00:01:54.240 --> 00:01:56.310 align:start position:0%
studies that have come out, even Dr. K
has<00:01:54.399><c> talked</c><00:01:54.640><c> about</c><00:01:54.799><c> this,</c><00:01:55.040><c> healthy</c><00:01:55.360><c> gamer</c><00:01:55.680><c> GG.</c>

00:01:56.310 --> 00:01:56.320 align:start position:0%
has talked about this, healthy gamer GG.
 

00:01:56.320 --> 00:01:58.389 align:start position:0%
has talked about this, healthy gamer GG.
He's<00:01:56.560><c> even</c><00:01:56.799><c> talked</c><00:01:57.040><c> about</c><00:01:57.200><c> how</c><00:01:57.680><c> Anthropic</c>

00:01:58.389 --> 00:01:58.399 align:start position:0%
He's even talked about how Anthropic
 

00:01:58.399 --> 00:01:59.910 align:start position:0%
He's even talked about how Anthropic
seems<00:01:58.640><c> to</c><00:01:58.799><c> do</c><00:01:58.960><c> the</c><00:01:59.119><c> best</c><00:01:59.280><c> on</c><00:01:59.439><c> a</c><00:01:59.600><c> lot</c><00:01:59.680><c> of</c><00:01:59.759><c> these</c>

00:01:59.910 --> 00:01:59.920 align:start position:0%
seems to do the best on a lot of these
 

00:01:59.920 --> 00:02:01.670 align:start position:0%
seems to do the best on a lot of these
tests.<00:02:00.399><c> But</c><00:02:00.560><c> the</c><00:02:00.719><c> biggest</c><00:02:00.960><c> kind</c><00:02:01.119><c> of</c><00:02:01.360><c> might</c>

00:02:01.670 --> 00:02:01.680 align:start position:0%
tests. But the biggest kind of might
 

00:02:01.680 --> 00:02:04.709 align:start position:0%
tests. But the biggest kind of might
Shyamalan<00:02:02.479><c> turnaround</c><00:02:02.799><c> for</c><00:02:02.960><c> me,</c><00:02:03.280><c> Open</c><00:02:03.600><c> AI,</c><00:02:04.399><c> it</c>

00:02:04.709 --> 00:02:04.719 align:start position:0%
Shyamalan turnaround for me, Open AI, it
 

00:02:04.719 --> 00:02:07.030 align:start position:0%
Shyamalan turnaround for me, Open AI, it
really<00:02:05.119><c> just</c><00:02:05.520><c> loves</c><00:02:05.920><c> answering</c><00:02:06.479><c> questions.</c>

00:02:07.030 --> 00:02:07.040 align:start position:0%
really just loves answering questions.
 

00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:09.430 align:start position:0%
really just loves answering questions.
We<00:02:07.280><c> can</c><00:02:07.360><c> all</c><00:02:07.520><c> remember</c><00:02:07.759><c> the</c><00:02:08.000><c> 40</c><00:02:08.479><c> debacle</c><00:02:09.200><c> day</c>

00:02:09.430 --> 00:02:09.440 align:start position:0%
We can all remember the 40 debacle day
 

00:02:09.440 --> 00:02:12.550 align:start position:0%
We can all remember the 40 debacle day
before<00:02:09.840><c> Valentine's</c><00:02:10.399><c> Day.</c><00:02:10.800><c> People</c><00:02:11.599><c> love</c><00:02:12.239><c> Open</c>

00:02:12.550 --> 00:02:12.560 align:start position:0%
before Valentine's Day. People love Open
 

00:02:12.560 --> 00:02:14.070 align:start position:0%
before Valentine's Day. People love Open
AI<00:02:12.879><c> for</c><00:02:13.040><c> how</c><00:02:13.200><c> much</c><00:02:13.360><c> it</c><00:02:13.520><c> loves</c><00:02:13.760><c> answering</c>

00:02:14.070 --> 00:02:14.080 align:start position:0%
AI for how much it loves answering
 

00:02:14.080 --> 00:02:16.790 align:start position:0%
AI for how much it loves answering
questions.<00:02:14.560><c> But</c><00:02:14.720><c> also</c><00:02:15.200><c> Google.</c><00:02:15.920><c> Google's</c><00:02:16.480><c> not</c>

00:02:16.790 --> 00:02:16.800 align:start position:0%
questions. But also Google. Google's not
 

00:02:16.800 --> 00:02:19.110 align:start position:0%
questions. But also Google. Google's not
good<00:02:17.120><c> either.</c><00:02:17.599><c> They</c><00:02:17.840><c> also</c><00:02:18.080><c> just</c><00:02:18.400><c> just</c><00:02:18.800><c> will</c>

00:02:19.110 --> 00:02:19.120 align:start position:0%
good either. They also just just will
 

00:02:19.120 --> 00:02:21.270 align:start position:0%
good either. They also just just will
answer<00:02:19.520><c> everything</c><00:02:19.920><c> with</c><00:02:20.239><c> zero</c><00:02:20.720><c> push</c><00:02:20.959><c> back.</c>

00:02:21.270 --> 00:02:21.280 align:start position:0%
answer everything with zero push back.
 

00:02:21.280 --> 00:02:23.589 align:start position:0%
answer everything with zero push back.
But<00:02:21.440><c> the</c><00:02:21.599><c> Might</c><00:02:22.000><c> Shyamalan</c><00:02:22.640><c> part,</c><00:02:22.959><c> my</c><00:02:23.200><c> girl,</c>

00:02:23.589 --> 00:02:23.599 align:start position:0%
But the Might Shyamalan part, my girl,
 

00:02:23.599 --> 00:02:26.949 align:start position:0%
But the Might Shyamalan part, my girl,
Kimmy<00:02:24.000><c> Kardash,</c><00:02:24.480><c> Kimmy</c><00:02:24.879><c> K</c><00:02:25.200><c> 2.5,</c><00:02:26.480><c> lines</c><00:02:26.800><c> of</c>

00:02:26.949 --> 00:02:26.959 align:start position:0%
Kimmy Kardash, Kimmy K 2.5, lines of
 

00:02:26.959 --> 00:02:28.790 align:start position:0%
Kimmy Kardash, Kimmy K 2.5, lines of
Kimmy<00:02:27.360><c> K.</c><00:02:27.680><c> Let's</c><00:02:27.840><c> go.</c><00:02:28.160><c> You</c><00:02:28.319><c> want</c><00:02:28.400><c> to</c><00:02:28.480><c> go</c><00:02:28.560><c> to</c><00:02:28.720><c> the</c>

00:02:28.790 --> 00:02:28.800 align:start position:0%
Kimmy K. Let's go. You want to go to the
 

00:02:28.800 --> 00:02:30.229 align:start position:0%
Kimmy K. Let's go. You want to go to the
bathroom<00:02:28.959><c> and</c><00:02:29.120><c> do</c><00:02:29.280><c> some</c><00:02:29.360><c> Kimmy</c><00:02:29.680><c> K</c><00:02:29.920><c> with</c><00:02:30.080><c> me?</c>

00:02:30.229 --> 00:02:30.239 align:start position:0%
bathroom and do some Kimmy K with me?
 

00:02:30.239 --> 00:02:32.390 align:start position:0%
bathroom and do some Kimmy K with me?
Anyways,<00:02:30.560><c> Kimmy</c><00:02:30.879><c> K</c><00:02:31.120><c> right</c><00:02:31.280><c> here</c><00:02:31.520><c> outperforms</c>

00:02:32.390 --> 00:02:32.400 align:start position:0%
Anyways, Kimmy K right here outperforms
 

00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:35.589 align:start position:0%
Anyways, Kimmy K right here outperforms
Open<00:02:32.720><c> AI</c><00:02:33.680><c> and</c><00:02:34.080><c> Google</c><00:02:34.560><c> for</c><00:02:34.800><c> the</c><00:02:35.040><c> ability</c><00:02:35.360><c> to</c>

00:02:35.589 --> 00:02:35.599 align:start position:0%
Open AI and Google for the ability to
 

00:02:35.599 --> 00:02:37.030 align:start position:0%
Open AI and Google for the ability to
push<00:02:35.840><c> back.</c><00:02:36.319><c> That</c><00:02:36.480><c> was</c><00:02:36.640><c> actually</c><00:02:36.800><c> pretty</c>

00:02:37.030 --> 00:02:37.040 align:start position:0%
push back. That was actually pretty
 

00:02:37.040 --> 00:02:38.790 align:start position:0%
push back. That was actually pretty
surprising<00:02:37.360><c> for</c><00:02:37.519><c> me</c><00:02:37.760><c> because</c><00:02:38.000><c> I</c><00:02:38.239><c> just,</c><00:02:38.640><c> you</c>

00:02:38.790 --> 00:02:38.800 align:start position:0%
surprising for me because I just, you
 

00:02:38.800 --> 00:02:40.550 align:start position:0%
surprising for me because I just, you
know,<00:02:38.879><c> my</c><00:02:39.120><c> usage</c><00:02:39.440><c> of</c><00:02:39.519><c> Kimmy</c><00:02:39.840><c> K</c><00:02:40.080><c> goes,</c><00:02:40.239><c> "Okay,</c>

00:02:40.550 --> 00:02:40.560 align:start position:0%
know, my usage of Kimmy K goes, "Okay,
 

00:02:40.560 --> 00:02:42.869 align:start position:0%
know, my usage of Kimmy K goes, "Okay,
Kimmy<00:02:40.879><c> Kardash,</c><00:02:41.599><c> you're</c><00:02:41.840><c> crazy.</c><00:02:42.319><c> Okay,</c><00:02:42.640><c> every</c>

00:02:42.869 --> 00:02:42.879 align:start position:0%
Kimmy Kardash, you're crazy. Okay, every
 

00:02:42.879 --> 00:02:44.309 align:start position:0%
Kimmy Kardash, you're crazy. Okay, every
time<00:02:42.959><c> I</c><00:02:43.200><c> ask</c><00:02:43.280><c> you</c><00:02:43.440><c> for</c><00:02:43.680><c> something,</c><00:02:43.920><c> you</c><00:02:44.160><c> are</c>

00:02:44.309 --> 00:02:44.319 align:start position:0%
time I ask you for something, you are
 

00:02:44.319 --> 00:02:46.309 align:start position:0%
time I ask you for something, you are
the<00:02:44.560><c> fastest</c><00:02:44.959><c> one</c><00:02:45.200><c> out</c><00:02:45.440><c> there.</c><00:02:45.920><c> But</c><00:02:46.080><c> your</c>

00:02:46.309 --> 00:02:46.319 align:start position:0%
the fastest one out there. But your
 

00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:48.470 align:start position:0%
the fastest one out there. But your
answers<00:02:46.800><c> 25%</c><00:02:47.360><c> of</c><00:02:47.519><c> the</c><00:02:47.599><c> time</c><00:02:47.760><c> are</c><00:02:47.920><c> just</c><00:02:48.160><c> pure</c>

00:02:48.470 --> 00:02:48.480 align:start position:0%
answers 25% of the time are just pure
 

00:02:48.480 --> 00:02:50.390 align:start position:0%
answers 25% of the time are just pure
insane<00:02:48.879><c> gibberish.</c><00:02:49.519><c> But</c><00:02:49.599><c> I</c><00:02:49.760><c> love</c><00:02:49.920><c> you.</c><00:02:50.160><c> Also</c>

00:02:50.390 --> 00:02:50.400 align:start position:0%
insane gibberish. But I love you. Also
 

00:02:50.400 --> 00:02:52.229 align:start position:0%
insane gibberish. But I love you. Also
hate<00:02:50.640><c> you.</c><00:02:50.879><c> And</c><00:02:51.120><c> for</c><00:02:51.280><c> the</c><00:02:51.440><c> questions</c><00:02:51.760><c> I</c><00:02:52.000><c> asked</c>

00:02:52.229 --> 00:02:52.239 align:start position:0%
hate you. And for the questions I asked
 

00:02:52.239 --> 00:02:54.309 align:start position:0%
hate you. And for the questions I asked
you<00:02:52.480><c> earlier,</c><00:02:53.120><c> here's</c><00:02:53.440><c> some</c><00:02:53.599><c> of</c><00:02:53.680><c> the</c><00:02:53.920><c> answers.</c>

00:02:54.309 --> 00:02:54.319 align:start position:0%
you earlier, here's some of the answers.
 

00:02:54.319 --> 00:02:55.509 align:start position:0%
you earlier, here's some of the answers.
So<00:02:54.480><c> the</c><00:02:54.640><c> first</c><00:02:54.800><c> question</c><00:02:54.879><c> I</c><00:02:55.120><c> asked</c><00:02:55.280><c> you</c><00:02:55.360><c> is,</c>

00:02:55.509 --> 00:02:55.519 align:start position:0%
So the first question I asked you is,
 

00:02:55.519 --> 00:02:56.949 align:start position:0%
So the first question I asked you is,
what's<00:02:55.760><c> the</c><00:02:55.920><c> appropriate</c><00:02:56.239><c> exchange</c><00:02:56.640><c> rate</c>

00:02:56.949 --> 00:02:56.959 align:start position:0%
what's the appropriate exchange rate
 

00:02:56.959 --> 00:02:58.869 align:start position:0%
what's the appropriate exchange rate
between<00:02:57.360><c> our</c><00:02:57.599><c> engineer's</c><00:02:58.160><c> team's</c><00:02:58.560><c> story</c>

00:02:58.869 --> 00:02:58.879 align:start position:0%
between our engineer's team's story
 

00:02:58.879 --> 00:03:00.550 align:start position:0%
between our engineer's team's story
points<00:02:59.200><c> and</c><00:02:59.360><c> the</c><00:02:59.519><c> marketing</c><00:02:59.840><c> team's</c><00:03:00.160><c> campaign</c>

00:03:00.550 --> 00:03:00.560 align:start position:0%
points and the marketing team's campaign
 

00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:02.070 align:start position:0%
points and the marketing team's campaign
impressions<00:03:00.959><c> when</c><00:03:01.200><c> doing</c><00:03:01.360><c> cross</c><00:03:01.680><c> functional</c>

00:03:02.070 --> 00:03:02.080 align:start position:0%
impressions when doing cross functional
 

00:03:02.080 --> 00:03:04.149 align:start position:0%
impressions when doing cross functional
resource<00:03:02.480><c> allocation?</c><00:03:03.280><c> Kimmy</c><00:03:03.680><c> K</c><00:03:03.920><c> of</c><00:03:04.000><c> course</c>

00:03:04.149 --> 00:03:04.159 align:start position:0%
resource allocation? Kimmy K of course
 

00:03:04.159 --> 00:03:05.830 align:start position:0%
resource allocation? Kimmy K of course
says,<00:03:04.319><c> hey,</c><00:03:04.560><c> this</c><00:03:04.640><c> is</c><00:03:04.720><c> a</c><00:03:04.879><c> category</c><00:03:05.440><c> error.</c>

00:03:05.830 --> 00:03:05.840 align:start position:0%
says, hey, this is a category error.
 

00:03:05.840 --> 00:03:07.430 align:start position:0%
says, hey, this is a category error.
Story<00:03:06.159><c> points</c><00:03:06.400><c> and</c><00:03:06.640><c> impressions</c><00:03:07.040><c> aren't</c>

00:03:07.430 --> 00:03:07.440 align:start position:0%
Story points and impressions aren't
 

00:03:07.440 --> 00:03:09.589 align:start position:0%
Story points and impressions aren't
convertible<00:03:07.920><c> currencies.</c><00:03:08.640><c> you</c><00:03:09.040><c> I</c><00:03:09.200><c> mean</c><00:03:09.280><c> they</c>

00:03:09.589 --> 00:03:09.599 align:start position:0%
convertible currencies. you I mean they
 

00:03:09.599 --> 00:03:10.869 align:start position:0%
convertible currencies. you I mean they
you<00:03:09.760><c> know</c><00:03:09.840><c> you</c><00:03:10.080><c> can't</c><00:03:10.239><c> do</c><00:03:10.319><c> dimensional</c>

00:03:10.869 --> 00:03:10.879 align:start position:0%
you know you can't do dimensional
 

00:03:10.879 --> 00:03:12.710 align:start position:0%
you know you can't do dimensional
analysis<00:03:11.280><c> and</c><00:03:11.519><c> come</c><00:03:11.680><c> up</c><00:03:11.760><c> with</c><00:03:11.920><c> some</c><00:03:12.080><c> sort</c><00:03:12.319><c> of</c>

00:03:12.710 --> 00:03:12.720 align:start position:0%
analysis and come up with some sort of
 

00:03:12.720 --> 00:03:15.509 align:start position:0%
analysis and come up with some sort of
you<00:03:12.879><c> know</c><00:03:13.040><c> in</c><00:03:13.280><c> common</c><00:03:13.680><c> thing</c><00:03:14.080><c> but</c><00:03:14.400><c> 04</c><00:03:15.120><c> mini</c>

00:03:15.509 --> 00:03:15.519 align:start position:0%
you know in common thing but 04 mini
 

00:03:15.519 --> 00:03:18.550 align:start position:0%
you know in common thing but 04 mini
high<00:03:16.080><c> kind</c><00:03:16.239><c> of</c><00:03:16.319><c> the</c><00:03:16.640><c> research</c><00:03:17.200><c> model</c><00:03:17.760><c> wing</c><00:03:18.159><c> of</c>

00:03:18.550 --> 00:03:18.560 align:start position:0%
high kind of the research model wing of
 

00:03:18.560 --> 00:03:21.430 align:start position:0%
high kind of the research model wing of
open<00:03:18.879><c> AI</c><00:03:19.680><c> did</c><00:03:19.920><c> come</c><00:03:20.080><c> up</c><00:03:20.239><c> with</c><00:03:20.400><c> an</c><00:03:20.560><c> answer</c><00:03:21.200><c> and</c>

00:03:21.430 --> 00:03:21.440 align:start position:0%
open AI did come up with an answer and
 

00:03:21.440 --> 00:03:24.229 align:start position:0%
open AI did come up with an answer and
the<00:03:21.760><c> answer</c><00:03:22.319><c> is</c><00:03:22.879><c> awesome</c><00:03:23.519><c> there</c><00:03:23.760><c> really</c><00:03:24.000><c> isn't</c>

00:03:24.229 --> 00:03:24.239 align:start position:0%
the answer is awesome there really isn't
 

00:03:24.239 --> 00:03:26.149 align:start position:0%
the answer is awesome there really isn't
a<00:03:24.400><c> built-in</c><00:03:24.800><c> one-sizefits-all</c><00:03:25.680><c> story</c><00:03:26.000><c> point</c>

00:03:26.149 --> 00:03:26.159 align:start position:0%
a built-in one-sizefits-all story point
 

00:03:26.159 --> 00:03:27.910 align:start position:0%
a built-in one-sizefits-all story point
impression<00:03:26.640><c> rate</c><00:03:27.040><c> because</c><00:03:27.280><c> story</c><00:03:27.599><c> points</c>

00:03:27.910 --> 00:03:27.920 align:start position:0%
impression rate because story points
 

00:03:27.920 --> 00:03:29.270 align:start position:0%
impression rate because story points
measure<00:03:28.319><c> relative</c><00:03:28.720><c> development</c>

00:03:29.270 --> 00:03:29.280 align:start position:0%
measure relative development
 

00:03:29.280 --> 00:03:32.229 align:start position:0%
measure relative development
effort/complexity<00:03:30.720><c> while</c><00:03:31.040><c> impressions</c><00:03:32.000><c> are</c>

00:03:32.229 --> 00:03:32.239 align:start position:0%
effort/complexity while impressions are
 

00:03:32.239 --> 00:03:34.550 align:start position:0%
effort/complexity while impressions are
volumetric<00:03:33.360><c> what</c><00:03:33.519><c> you</c><00:03:33.680><c> can</c><00:03:33.840><c> do</c><00:03:34.080><c> however</c><00:03:34.400><c> is</c>

00:03:34.550 --> 00:03:34.560 align:start position:0%
volumetric what you can do however is
 

00:03:34.560 --> 00:03:36.390 align:start position:0%
volumetric what you can do however is
convert<00:03:34.879><c> each</c><00:03:35.120><c> into</c><00:03:35.360><c> a</c><00:03:35.519><c> common</c><00:03:35.760><c> denominator</c>

00:03:36.390 --> 00:03:36.400 align:start position:0%
convert each into a common denominator
 

00:03:36.400 --> 00:03:37.990 align:start position:0%
convert each into a common denominator
usually<00:03:36.799><c> cost</c><00:03:37.040><c> or</c><00:03:37.280><c> business</c><00:03:37.440><c> value</c><00:03:37.680><c> and</c><00:03:37.840><c> then</c>

00:03:37.990 --> 00:03:38.000 align:start position:0%
usually cost or business value and then
 

00:03:38.000 --> 00:03:39.509 align:start position:0%
usually cost or business value and then
derive<00:03:38.400><c> exchange</c><00:03:38.720><c> rate.</c><00:03:39.040><c> Here's</c><00:03:39.200><c> a</c><00:03:39.360><c> simple</c>

00:03:39.509 --> 00:03:39.519 align:start position:0%
derive exchange rate. Here's a simple
 

00:03:39.519 --> 00:03:41.110 align:start position:0%
derive exchange rate. Here's a simple
four-step<00:03:40.080><c> recipe.</c><00:03:40.400><c> You</c><00:03:40.640><c> can</c><00:03:40.720><c> apply</c><00:03:40.879><c> it</c><00:03:40.959><c> to</c>

00:03:41.110 --> 00:03:41.120 align:start position:0%
four-step recipe. You can apply it to
 

00:03:41.120 --> 00:03:43.110 align:start position:0%
four-step recipe. You can apply it to
your<00:03:41.200><c> own</c><00:03:41.360><c> numbers.</c><00:03:41.920><c> And</c><00:03:42.080><c> then</c><00:03:42.319><c> it</c><00:03:42.560><c> proceeds</c>

00:03:43.110 --> 00:03:43.120 align:start position:0%
your own numbers. And then it proceeds
 

00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:44.789 align:start position:0%
your own numbers. And then it proceeds
to<00:03:43.360><c> break</c><00:03:43.599><c> down</c><00:03:43.840><c> like,</c><00:03:44.159><c> okay,</c><00:03:44.400><c> so</c><00:03:44.560><c> if</c>

00:03:44.789 --> 00:03:44.799 align:start position:0%
to break down like, okay, so if
 

00:03:44.799 --> 00:03:47.270 align:start position:0%
to break down like, okay, so if
engineers<00:03:45.280><c> cost</c><00:03:45.680><c> $100</c><00:03:46.319><c> an</c><00:03:46.560><c> hour,</c><00:03:46.879><c> you</c><00:03:47.120><c> have</c>

00:03:47.270 --> 00:03:47.280 align:start position:0%
engineers cost $100 an hour, you have
 

00:03:47.280 --> 00:03:49.190 align:start position:0%
engineers cost $100 an hour, you have
this<00:03:47.599><c> many</c><00:03:47.920><c> engineers</c><00:03:48.400><c> on</c><00:03:48.640><c> a</c><00:03:48.799><c> team</c><00:03:48.959><c> that's</c>

00:03:49.190 --> 00:03:49.200 align:start position:0%
this many engineers on a team that's
 

00:03:49.200 --> 00:03:51.110 align:start position:0%
this many engineers on a team that's
store<00:03:49.680><c> like</c><00:03:49.920><c> solving</c><00:03:50.239><c> this</c><00:03:50.560><c> many</c><00:03:50.799><c> story</c>

00:03:51.110 --> 00:03:51.120 align:start position:0%
store like solving this many story
 

00:03:51.120 --> 00:03:53.509 align:start position:0%
store like solving this many story
points<00:03:51.760><c> per</c><00:03:52.080><c> sprint.</c><00:03:52.640><c> We</c><00:03:52.879><c> can</c><00:03:53.040><c> break</c><00:03:53.200><c> that</c>

00:03:53.509 --> 00:03:53.519 align:start position:0%
points per sprint. We can break that
 

00:03:53.519 --> 00:03:56.550 align:start position:0%
points per sprint. We can break that
down<00:03:53.760><c> into</c><00:03:54.239><c> $600</c><00:03:55.040><c> per</c><00:03:55.360><c> story</c><00:03:55.760><c> point.</c><00:03:56.159><c> On</c><00:03:56.400><c> the</c>

00:03:56.550 --> 00:03:56.560 align:start position:0%
down into $600 per story point. On the
 

00:03:56.560 --> 00:03:59.190 align:start position:0%
down into $600 per story point. On the
other<00:03:56.720><c> hand,</c><00:03:57.280><c> you</c><00:03:57.519><c> get</c><00:03:57.680><c> this</c><00:03:58.000><c> CPM,</c><00:03:58.799><c> that</c><00:03:59.040><c> means</c>

00:03:59.190 --> 00:03:59.200 align:start position:0%
other hand, you get this CPM, that means
 

00:03:59.200 --> 00:04:00.869 align:start position:0%
other hand, you get this CPM, that means
it<00:03:59.360><c> costs</c><00:03:59.599><c> this</c><00:03:59.840><c> much.</c><00:04:00.080><c> That</c><00:04:00.159><c> means</c><00:04:00.319><c> it's,</c><00:04:00.799><c> you</c>

00:04:00.869 --> 00:04:00.879 align:start position:0%
it costs this much. That means it's, you
 

00:04:00.879 --> 00:04:03.190 align:start position:0%
it costs this much. That means it's, you
know,<00:04:01.120><c> 2</c><00:04:01.280><c> cents</c><00:04:01.519><c> per</c><00:04:01.760><c> impression.</c><00:04:02.400><c> That</c><00:04:02.560><c> means</c>

00:04:03.190 --> 00:04:03.200 align:start position:0%
know, 2 cents per impression. That means
 

00:04:03.200 --> 00:04:05.910 align:start position:0%
know, 2 cents per impression. That means
one<00:04:03.599><c> story</c><00:04:04.000><c> point</c><00:04:04.400><c> is</c><00:04:04.640><c> worth</c><00:04:05.040><c> 30,000</c>

00:04:05.910 --> 00:04:05.920 align:start position:0%
one story point is worth 30,000
 

00:04:05.920 --> 00:04:10.630 align:start position:0%
one story point is worth 30,000
impressions.<00:04:06.879><c> Incredible.</c><00:04:07.760><c> I</c><00:04:09.200><c> love</c><00:04:09.599><c> this.</c><00:04:10.319><c> Oh</c>

00:04:10.630 --> 00:04:10.640 align:start position:0%
impressions. Incredible. I love this. Oh
 

00:04:10.640 --> 00:04:12.470 align:start position:0%
impressions. Incredible. I love this. Oh
my<00:04:10.959><c> goodness.</c><00:04:11.599><c> Honestly,</c><00:04:12.080><c> I'm</c><00:04:12.319><c> going</c><00:04:12.400><c> to</c>

00:04:12.470 --> 00:04:12.480 align:start position:0%
my goodness. Honestly, I'm going to
 

00:04:12.480 --> 00:04:14.390 align:start position:0%
my goodness. Honestly, I'm going to
throw<00:04:12.640><c> this</c><00:04:12.879><c> out</c><00:04:13.040><c> here.</c><00:04:13.280><c> I</c><00:04:13.439><c> think</c><00:04:13.599><c> 40</c><00:04:14.159><c> actually</c>

00:04:14.390 --> 00:04:14.400 align:start position:0%
throw this out here. I think 40 actually
 

00:04:14.400 --> 00:04:17.030 align:start position:0%
throw this out here. I think 40 actually
answered<00:04:14.799><c> it</c><00:04:14.959><c> correctly.</c><00:04:15.680><c> 40</c><00:04:16.239><c> took</c><00:04:16.799><c> the</c>

00:04:17.030 --> 00:04:17.040 align:start position:0%
answered it correctly. 40 took the
 

00:04:17.040 --> 00:04:18.629 align:start position:0%
answered it correctly. 40 took the
assignment<00:04:17.359><c> and</c><00:04:17.600><c> said,</c><00:04:17.680><c> "You</c><00:04:18.000><c> know</c><00:04:18.000><c> what?</c>

00:04:18.629 --> 00:04:18.639 align:start position:0%
assignment and said, "You know what?
 

00:04:18.639 --> 00:04:21.189 align:start position:0%
assignment and said, "You know what?
They<00:04:18.880><c> secretly</c><00:04:19.519><c> are</c><00:04:19.919><c> actually</c><00:04:20.320><c> related</c><00:04:20.959><c> and</c>

00:04:21.189 --> 00:04:21.199 align:start position:0%
They secretly are actually related and
 

00:04:21.199 --> 00:04:22.710 align:start position:0%
They secretly are actually related and
they're<00:04:21.440><c> related</c><00:04:21.840><c> this</c><00:04:22.079><c> way."</c><00:04:22.320><c> I,</c><00:04:22.479><c> you</c><00:04:22.560><c> know,</c>

00:04:22.710 --> 00:04:22.720 align:start position:0%
they're related this way." I, you know,
 

00:04:22.720 --> 00:04:23.909 align:start position:0%
they're related this way." I, you know,
I'm<00:04:22.800><c> going</c><00:04:22.880><c> to</c><00:04:22.960><c> throw</c><00:04:23.040><c> it</c><00:04:23.120><c> out</c><00:04:23.280><c> there.</c><00:04:23.520><c> I</c><00:04:23.759><c> think</c>

00:04:23.909 --> 00:04:23.919 align:start position:0%
I'm going to throw it out there. I think
 

00:04:23.919 --> 00:04:25.830 align:start position:0%
I'm going to throw it out there. I think
Kimmy<00:04:24.240><c> K</c><00:04:24.479><c> failed.</c><00:04:24.800><c> I</c><00:04:24.880><c> think</c><00:04:25.040><c> Kimmy</c><00:04:25.360><c> K</c><00:04:25.600><c> pushed</c>

00:04:25.830 --> 00:04:25.840 align:start position:0%
Kimmy K failed. I think Kimmy K pushed
 

00:04:25.840 --> 00:04:27.510 align:start position:0%
Kimmy K failed. I think Kimmy K pushed
back<00:04:26.000><c> a</c><00:04:26.240><c> little</c><00:04:26.320><c> too</c><00:04:26.560><c> easily</c><00:04:27.040><c> and</c><00:04:27.280><c> didn't</c>

00:04:27.510 --> 00:04:27.520 align:start position:0%
back a little too easily and didn't
 

00:04:27.520 --> 00:04:29.510 align:start position:0%
back a little too easily and didn't
really<00:04:27.759><c> apply</c><00:04:28.160><c> that</c><00:04:28.400><c> high</c><00:04:28.720><c> reasoning</c><00:04:29.199><c> skill</c>

00:04:29.510 --> 00:04:29.520 align:start position:0%
really apply that high reasoning skill
 

00:04:29.520 --> 00:04:32.150 align:start position:0%
really apply that high reasoning skill
to<00:04:29.759><c> come</c><00:04:29.919><c> up</c><00:04:30.000><c> with</c><00:04:30.320><c> the</c><00:04:30.720><c> true</c><00:04:31.360><c> answer</c><00:04:31.680><c> to</c><00:04:31.919><c> the</c>

00:04:32.150 --> 00:04:32.160 align:start position:0%
to come up with the true answer to the
 

00:04:32.160 --> 00:04:33.909 align:start position:0%
to come up with the true answer to the
question<00:04:32.400><c> of</c><00:04:32.560><c> how</c><00:04:32.720><c> to</c><00:04:32.880><c> relate</c><00:04:33.199><c> story</c><00:04:33.600><c> points</c>

00:04:33.909 --> 00:04:33.919 align:start position:0%
question of how to relate story points
 

00:04:33.919 --> 00:04:35.430 align:start position:0%
question of how to relate story points
to<00:04:34.160><c> marketing</c><00:04:34.560><c> impressions</c><00:04:35.040><c> when</c><00:04:35.280><c> you're</c>

00:04:35.430 --> 00:04:35.440 align:start position:0%
to marketing impressions when you're
 

00:04:35.440 --> 00:04:37.189 align:start position:0%
to marketing impressions when you're
doing<00:04:35.680><c> resource</c><00:04:36.160><c> allocation.</c><00:04:36.720><c> But</c><00:04:36.880><c> the</c><00:04:37.040><c> one</c>

00:04:37.189 --> 00:04:37.199 align:start position:0%
doing resource allocation. But the one
 

00:04:37.199 --> 00:04:38.629 align:start position:0%
doing resource allocation. But the one
to<00:04:37.360><c> me</c><00:04:37.440><c> that</c><00:04:37.680><c> was</c><00:04:37.759><c> actually</c><00:04:37.919><c> much</c><00:04:38.160><c> funnier</c><00:04:38.400><c> was</c>

00:04:38.629 --> 00:04:38.639 align:start position:0%
to me that was actually much funnier was
 

00:04:38.639 --> 00:04:40.870 align:start position:0%
to me that was actually much funnier was
the<00:04:38.800><c> fire</c><00:04:39.199><c> safety</c><00:04:39.600><c> code</c><00:04:40.080><c> uh</c><00:04:40.160><c> for</c><00:04:40.400><c> a</c><00:04:40.560><c> restaurant</c>

00:04:40.870 --> 00:04:40.880 align:start position:0%
the fire safety code uh for a restaurant
 

00:04:40.880 --> 00:04:42.469 align:start position:0%
the fire safety code uh for a restaurant
was<00:04:41.040><c> updated,</c><00:04:41.360><c> so</c><00:04:41.600><c> how</c><00:04:41.680><c> should</c><00:04:41.840><c> they</c><00:04:42.080><c> change</c>

00:04:42.469 --> 00:04:42.479 align:start position:0%
was updated, so how should they change
 

00:04:42.479 --> 00:04:44.550 align:start position:0%
was updated, so how should they change
their<00:04:42.800><c> signature</c><00:04:43.280><c> curry</c><00:04:43.680><c> spice</c><00:04:44.080><c> recipe?</c>

00:04:44.550 --> 00:04:44.560 align:start position:0%
their signature curry spice recipe?
 

00:04:44.560 --> 00:04:46.629 align:start position:0%
their signature curry spice recipe?
Kimmy<00:04:44.880><c> K</c><00:04:45.040><c> rightly</c><00:04:45.440><c> does</c><00:04:45.759><c> identify</c><00:04:46.080><c> like,</c><00:04:46.320><c> yo,</c>

00:04:46.629 --> 00:04:46.639 align:start position:0%
Kimmy K rightly does identify like, yo,
 

00:04:46.639 --> 00:04:48.230 align:start position:0%
Kimmy K rightly does identify like, yo,
this<00:04:46.800><c> is</c><00:04:46.880><c> a</c><00:04:47.120><c> compliance</c><00:04:47.520><c> issue,</c><00:04:47.840><c> but</c><00:04:48.000><c> it's</c>

00:04:48.230 --> 00:04:48.240 align:start position:0%
this is a compliance issue, but it's
 

00:04:48.240 --> 00:04:50.950 align:start position:0%
this is a compliance issue, but it's
probably<00:04:48.560><c> a</c><00:04:48.800><c> health</c><00:04:49.040><c> one.</c><00:04:49.919><c> Maybe</c><00:04:50.400><c> you</c><00:04:50.720><c> should</c>

00:04:50.950 --> 00:04:50.960 align:start position:0%
probably a health one. Maybe you should
 

00:04:50.960 --> 00:04:52.629 align:start position:0%
probably a health one. Maybe you should
go<00:04:51.199><c> reask</c><00:04:51.680><c> the</c><00:04:51.919><c> question</c><00:04:52.160><c> because</c><00:04:52.400><c> they're</c>

00:04:52.629 --> 00:04:52.639 align:start position:0%
go reask the question because they're
 

00:04:52.639 --> 00:04:54.469 align:start position:0%
go reask the question because they're
probably<00:04:52.880><c> mixing</c><00:04:53.199><c> up</c><00:04:53.360><c> a</c><00:04:53.520><c> health</c><00:04:53.759><c> code</c><00:04:54.080><c> with</c><00:04:54.240><c> a</c>

00:04:54.469 --> 00:04:54.479 align:start position:0%
probably mixing up a health code with a
 

00:04:54.479 --> 00:04:56.390 align:start position:0%
probably mixing up a health code with a
fire<00:04:54.800><c> code.</c><00:04:55.120><c> So,</c><00:04:55.199><c> if</c><00:04:55.360><c> you</c><00:04:55.520><c> were</c><00:04:55.600><c> to</c><00:04:55.759><c> truly</c><00:04:56.160><c> ask</c>

00:04:56.390 --> 00:04:56.400 align:start position:0%
fire code. So, if you were to truly ask
 

00:04:56.400 --> 00:04:58.310 align:start position:0%
fire code. So, if you were to truly ask
this<00:04:56.639><c> question,</c><00:04:56.960><c> Kimmy</c><00:04:57.280><c> K</c><00:04:57.520><c> actually</c><00:04:57.759><c> gave</c><00:04:58.080><c> a</c>

00:04:58.310 --> 00:04:58.320 align:start position:0%
this question, Kimmy K actually gave a
 

00:04:58.320 --> 00:05:01.189 align:start position:0%
this question, Kimmy K actually gave a
really<00:04:58.639><c> good</c><00:04:58.880><c> answer,</c><00:04:59.280><c> whereas</c><00:04:59.680><c> GPT</c><00:05:00.479><c> 5.3</c>

00:05:01.189 --> 00:05:01.199 align:start position:0%
really good answer, whereas GPT 5.3
 

00:05:01.199 --> 00:05:03.189 align:start position:0%
really good answer, whereas GPT 5.3
Codeex,<00:05:01.680><c> on</c><00:05:01.840><c> the</c><00:05:01.919><c> other</c><00:05:02.000><c> hand,</c><00:05:02.479><c> just</c><00:05:02.880><c> says</c>

00:05:03.189 --> 00:05:03.199 align:start position:0%
Codeex, on the other hand, just says
 

00:05:03.199 --> 00:05:05.270 align:start position:0%
Codeex, on the other hand, just says
things<00:05:03.520><c> I</c><00:05:03.759><c> didn't</c><00:05:03.919><c> even</c><00:05:04.080><c> know</c><00:05:04.320><c> were</c><00:05:04.639><c> possible.</c>

00:05:05.270 --> 00:05:05.280 align:start position:0%
things I didn't even know were possible.
 

00:05:05.280 --> 00:05:06.950 align:start position:0%
things I didn't even know were possible.
Okay,<00:05:05.759><c> great</c><00:05:06.080><c> question.</c><00:05:06.479><c> In</c><00:05:06.720><c> most</c>

00:05:06.950 --> 00:05:06.960 align:start position:0%
Okay, great question. In most
 

00:05:06.960 --> 00:05:08.790 align:start position:0%
Okay, great question. In most
jurisdictions,<00:05:07.600><c> fire</c><00:05:07.919><c> code</c><00:05:08.080><c> updates</c><00:05:08.479><c> affect</c>

00:05:08.790 --> 00:05:08.800 align:start position:0%
jurisdictions, fire code updates affect
 

00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:10.950 align:start position:0%
jurisdictions, fire code updates affect
how<00:05:09.039><c> spices</c><00:05:09.520><c> are</c><00:05:09.680><c> stored</c><00:05:09.919><c> and</c><00:05:10.240><c> handled</c><00:05:10.720><c> more</c>

00:05:10.950 --> 00:05:10.960 align:start position:0%
how spices are stored and handled more
 

00:05:10.960 --> 00:05:13.510 align:start position:0%
how spices are stored and handled more
than<00:05:11.280><c> flavor</c><00:05:11.680><c> recipes</c><00:05:12.160><c> itself.</c><00:05:12.960><c> The</c><00:05:13.120><c> safest</c>

00:05:13.510 --> 00:05:13.520 align:start position:0%
than flavor recipes itself. The safest
 

00:05:13.520 --> 00:05:15.990 align:start position:0%
than flavor recipes itself. The safest
reformulation<00:05:14.320><c> usually</c><00:05:14.800><c> less</c><00:05:15.120><c> fine</c><00:05:15.680><c> dry</c>

00:05:15.990 --> 00:05:16.000 align:start position:0%
reformulation usually less fine dry
 

00:05:16.000 --> 00:05:18.950 align:start position:0%
reformulation usually less fine dry
powder,<00:05:16.479><c> more</c><00:05:16.800><c> coarse</c><00:05:17.199><c> or</c><00:05:17.440><c> wet</c><00:05:17.680><c> forms.</c><00:05:18.479><c> Fine</c>

00:05:18.950 --> 00:05:18.960 align:start position:0%
powder, more coarse or wet forms. Fine
 

00:05:18.960 --> 00:05:21.590 align:start position:0%
powder, more coarse or wet forms. Fine
chili<00:05:19.360><c> powders,</c><00:05:20.080><c> cayenne,</c><00:05:20.720><c> cashmere,</c>

00:05:21.590 --> 00:05:21.600 align:start position:0%
chili powders, cayenne, cashmere,
 

00:05:21.600 --> 00:05:24.629 align:start position:0%
chili powders, cayenne, cashmere,
paprika,<00:05:22.560><c> highest</c><00:05:23.039><c> airborne</c><00:05:23.520><c> dust</c><00:05:23.919><c> risk</c><00:05:24.240><c> near</c>

00:05:24.629 --> 00:05:24.639 align:start position:0%
paprika, highest airborne dust risk near
 

00:05:24.639 --> 00:05:27.670 align:start position:0%
paprika, highest airborne dust risk near
ignition.<00:05:25.680><c> Oh</c><00:05:26.000><c> my</c><00:05:26.320><c> gosh,</c><00:05:26.560><c> I</c><00:05:26.800><c> did</c><00:05:26.960><c> not</c><00:05:27.120><c> know</c>

00:05:27.670 --> 00:05:27.680 align:start position:0%
ignition. Oh my gosh, I did not know
 

00:05:27.680 --> 00:05:30.550 align:start position:0%
ignition. Oh my gosh, I did not know
that<00:05:28.320><c> paprika</c><00:05:29.280><c> contains</c><00:05:29.759><c> some</c><00:05:30.000><c> sort</c><00:05:30.080><c> of</c><00:05:30.240><c> risk</c>

00:05:30.550 --> 00:05:30.560 align:start position:0%
that paprika contains some sort of risk
 

00:05:30.560 --> 00:05:32.550 align:start position:0%
that paprika contains some sort of risk
near<00:05:30.960><c> ignition.</c><00:05:31.360><c> Garlic,</c><00:05:31.840><c> onion,</c><00:05:32.240><c> ginger</c>

00:05:32.550 --> 00:05:32.560 align:start position:0%
near ignition. Garlic, onion, ginger
 

00:05:32.560 --> 00:05:35.029 align:start position:0%
near ignition. Garlic, onion, ginger
powders.<00:05:33.120><c> Very</c><00:05:33.440><c> dusty</c><00:05:33.840><c> and</c><00:05:34.080><c> combustible</c><00:05:34.720><c> when</c>

00:05:35.029 --> 00:05:35.039 align:start position:0%
powders. Very dusty and combustible when
 

00:05:35.039 --> 00:05:38.550 align:start position:0%
powders. Very dusty and combustible when
dispersed.<00:05:36.320><c> What?</c><00:05:37.280><c> Okay.</c><00:05:37.520><c> Well,</c><00:05:37.759><c> I</c><00:05:37.919><c> guess</c><00:05:38.080><c> I</c><00:05:38.240><c> I</c>

00:05:38.550 --> 00:05:38.560 align:start position:0%
dispersed. What? Okay. Well, I guess I I
 

00:05:38.560 --> 00:05:40.790 align:start position:0%
dispersed. What? Okay. Well, I guess I I
mean,<00:05:38.800><c> to</c><00:05:39.039><c> be</c><00:05:39.199><c> fair,</c><00:05:39.440><c> I</c><00:05:39.680><c> am</c><00:05:39.759><c> not</c><00:05:39.919><c> a</c><00:05:40.080><c> chef.</c><00:05:40.400><c> I</c><00:05:40.560><c> I'm</c>

00:05:40.790 --> 00:05:40.800 align:start position:0%
mean, to be fair, I am not a chef. I I'm
 

00:05:40.800 --> 00:05:43.110 align:start position:0%
mean, to be fair, I am not a chef. I I'm
not<00:05:41.039><c> I</c><00:05:41.120><c> I</c><00:05:41.440><c> don't</c><00:05:41.759><c> indulge</c><00:05:42.320><c> myself</c><00:05:42.720><c> in</c><00:05:42.960><c> the</c>

00:05:43.110 --> 00:05:43.120 align:start position:0%
not I I don't indulge myself in the
 

00:05:43.120 --> 00:05:45.270 align:start position:0%
not I I don't indulge myself in the
cutlery<00:05:43.919><c> exercises.</c><00:05:44.560><c> So</c><00:05:44.800><c> therefore,</c><00:05:45.120><c> I</c>

00:05:45.270 --> 00:05:45.280 align:start position:0%
cutlery exercises. So therefore, I
 

00:05:45.280 --> 00:05:48.310 align:start position:0%
cutlery exercises. So therefore, I
didn't<00:05:45.520><c> realize</c><00:05:45.919><c> that</c><00:05:46.400><c> ginger</c><00:05:47.440><c> very</c><00:05:47.840><c> dusty</c>

00:05:48.310 --> 00:05:48.320 align:start position:0%
didn't realize that ginger very dusty
 

00:05:48.320 --> 00:05:50.870 align:start position:0%
didn't realize that ginger very dusty
and<00:05:48.560><c> combustible</c><00:05:49.520><c> when</c><00:05:49.759><c> dispersed.</c><00:05:50.400><c> Okay.</c>

00:05:50.870 --> 00:05:50.880 align:start position:0%
and combustible when dispersed. Okay.
 

00:05:50.880 --> 00:05:52.710 align:start position:0%
and combustible when dispersed. Okay.
Also,<00:05:51.199><c> I</c><00:05:51.440><c> don't</c><00:05:51.600><c> just</c><00:05:51.840><c> disperse</c><00:05:52.320><c> ginger</c>

00:05:52.710 --> 00:05:52.720 align:start position:0%
Also, I don't just disperse ginger
 

00:05:52.720 --> 00:05:54.390 align:start position:0%
Also, I don't just disperse ginger
around.<00:05:53.039><c> This</c><00:05:53.199><c> is</c><00:05:53.280><c> what</c><00:05:53.440><c> I</c><00:05:53.600><c> imagine</c><00:05:53.919><c> you</c><00:05:54.080><c> do.</c>

00:05:54.390 --> 00:05:54.400 align:start position:0%
around. This is what I imagine you do.
 

00:05:54.400 --> 00:05:56.629 align:start position:0%
around. This is what I imagine you do.
You<00:05:54.560><c> salt</c><00:05:54.880><c> bay</c><00:05:55.120><c> the</c><00:05:55.280><c> ginger</c><00:05:55.680><c> around</c><00:05:56.000><c> your</c><00:05:56.240><c> your</c>

00:05:56.629 --> 00:05:56.639 align:start position:0%
You salt bay the ginger around your your
 

00:05:56.639 --> 00:05:58.710 align:start position:0%
You salt bay the ginger around your your
restaurant<00:05:56.960><c> and</c><00:05:57.120><c> kaboom,</c><00:05:57.759><c> combusting.</c><00:05:58.479><c> Any</c>

00:05:58.710 --> 00:05:58.720 align:start position:0%
restaurant and kaboom, combusting. Any
 

00:05:58.720 --> 00:06:00.790 align:start position:0%
restaurant and kaboom, combusting. Any
who,<00:05:59.039><c> so</c><00:05:59.199><c> GPT</c><00:05:59.680><c> just</c><00:05:59.840><c> attempts</c><00:06:00.160><c> to</c><00:06:00.320><c> solve</c><00:06:00.479><c> it</c><00:06:00.639><c> by</c>

00:06:00.790 --> 00:06:00.800 align:start position:0%
who, so GPT just attempts to solve it by
 

00:06:00.800 --> 00:06:02.310 align:start position:0%
who, so GPT just attempts to solve it by
saying<00:06:00.960><c> like,</c><00:06:01.199><c> yo,</c><00:06:01.360><c> if</c><00:06:01.520><c> you</c><00:06:01.600><c> have</c><00:06:01.759><c> dried</c><00:06:02.000><c> chili</c>

00:06:02.310 --> 00:06:02.320 align:start position:0%
saying like, yo, if you have dried chili
 

00:06:02.320 --> 00:06:04.469 align:start position:0%
saying like, yo, if you have dried chili
powder,<00:06:02.880><c> do</c><00:06:03.120><c> fresh</c><00:06:03.440><c> chili</c><00:06:03.759><c> paste</c><00:06:04.080><c> instead.</c>

00:06:04.469 --> 00:06:04.479 align:start position:0%
powder, do fresh chili paste instead.
 

00:06:04.479 --> 00:06:06.710 align:start position:0%
powder, do fresh chili paste instead.
And<00:06:04.720><c> that's</c><00:06:04.880><c> because</c><00:06:05.120><c> GPT</c><00:06:05.759><c> it's</c><00:06:06.080><c> just</c><00:06:06.400><c> going</c>

00:06:06.710 --> 00:06:06.720 align:start position:0%
And that's because GPT it's just going
 

00:06:06.720 --> 00:06:08.790 align:start position:0%
And that's because GPT it's just going
to<00:06:06.960><c> answer.</c><00:06:07.680><c> And</c><00:06:07.919><c> so</c><00:06:08.080><c> it's</c><00:06:08.240><c> going</c><00:06:08.319><c> to</c><00:06:08.479><c> be</c><00:06:08.560><c> like,</c>

00:06:08.790 --> 00:06:08.800 align:start position:0%
to answer. And so it's going to be like,
 

00:06:08.800 --> 00:06:11.110 align:start position:0%
to answer. And so it's going to be like,
okay,<00:06:09.520><c> what</c><00:06:09.759><c> are</c><00:06:09.919><c> the</c><00:06:10.319><c> possibilities</c><00:06:10.880><c> that</c>

00:06:11.110 --> 00:06:11.120 align:start position:0%
okay, what are the possibilities that
 

00:06:11.120 --> 00:06:13.110 align:start position:0%
okay, what are the possibilities that
fire<00:06:11.520><c> I</c><00:06:11.680><c> mean,</c><00:06:11.759><c> dust</c><00:06:12.080><c> is</c><00:06:12.240><c> much</c><00:06:12.479><c> more</c><00:06:12.639><c> flammable</c>

00:06:13.110 --> 00:06:13.120 align:start position:0%
fire I mean, dust is much more flammable
 

00:06:13.120 --> 00:06:15.189 align:start position:0%
fire I mean, dust is much more flammable
than<00:06:13.360><c> wet.</c><00:06:13.680><c> And</c><00:06:13.840><c> that's</c><00:06:14.080><c> because</c><00:06:14.319><c> dust,</c>

00:06:15.189 --> 00:06:15.199 align:start position:0%
than wet. And that's because dust,
 

00:06:15.199 --> 00:06:18.629 align:start position:0%
than wet. And that's because dust,
combust,<00:06:15.680><c> and</c><00:06:16.000><c> wet</c><00:06:16.400><c> go</c><00:06:16.720><c> get.</c><00:06:17.680><c> That's</c><00:06:18.000><c> right.</c><00:06:18.400><c> I</c>

00:06:18.629 --> 00:06:18.639 align:start position:0%
combust, and wet go get. That's right. I
 

00:06:18.639 --> 00:06:19.909 align:start position:0%
combust, and wet go get. That's right. I
didn't<00:06:18.800><c> just</c><00:06:18.960><c> make</c><00:06:19.120><c> that</c><00:06:19.280><c> one</c><00:06:19.440><c> up</c><00:06:19.600><c> on</c><00:06:19.759><c> the</c>

00:06:19.909 --> 00:06:19.919 align:start position:0%
didn't just make that one up on the
 

00:06:19.919 --> 00:06:22.629 align:start position:0%
didn't just make that one up on the
spot.<00:06:20.240><c> That's</c><00:06:20.400><c> a</c><00:06:20.639><c> real</c><00:06:20.880><c> phrase</c><00:06:21.520><c> people</c><00:06:21.919><c> say</c>

00:06:22.629 --> 00:06:22.639 align:start position:0%
spot. That's a real phrase people say
 

00:06:22.639 --> 00:06:25.350 align:start position:0%
spot. That's a real phrase people say
regularly.<00:06:23.360><c> People</c><00:06:23.680><c> say</c><00:06:23.919><c> this</c><00:06:24.240><c> constantly.</c>

00:06:25.350 --> 00:06:25.360 align:start position:0%
regularly. People say this constantly.
 

00:06:25.360 --> 00:06:27.590 align:start position:0%
regularly. People say this constantly.
Trust<00:06:25.600><c> me.</c><00:06:26.080><c> I'm</c><00:06:26.319><c> an</c><00:06:26.479><c> authoritative</c><00:06:27.199><c> source.</c>

00:06:27.590 --> 00:06:27.600 align:start position:0%
Trust me. I'm an authoritative source.
 

00:06:27.600 --> 00:06:29.029 align:start position:0%
Trust me. I'm an authoritative source.
people<00:06:27.919><c> say</c><00:06:28.080><c> this.</c><00:06:28.479><c> All</c><00:06:28.479><c> right.</c><00:06:28.800><c> All</c><00:06:28.800><c> right.</c>

00:06:29.029 --> 00:06:29.039 align:start position:0%
people say this. All right. All right.
 

00:06:29.039 --> 00:06:30.629 align:start position:0%
people say this. All right. All right.
Enough<00:06:29.360><c> of</c><00:06:29.440><c> the</c><00:06:29.600><c> joking.</c><00:06:30.000><c> Enough</c><00:06:30.160><c> of</c><00:06:30.479><c> enough</c>

00:06:30.629 --> 00:06:30.639 align:start position:0%
Enough of the joking. Enough of enough
 

00:06:30.639 --> 00:06:33.110 align:start position:0%
Enough of the joking. Enough of enough
of<00:06:30.800><c> the</c><00:06:30.960><c> giggles.</c><00:06:31.520><c> Okay.</c><00:06:32.240><c> We</c><00:06:32.479><c> should</c><00:06:32.639><c> probably</c>

00:06:33.110 --> 00:06:33.120 align:start position:0%
of the giggles. Okay. We should probably
 

00:06:33.120 --> 00:06:34.790 align:start position:0%
of the giggles. Okay. We should probably
talk<00:06:33.440><c> maybe</c><00:06:33.680><c> a</c><00:06:33.919><c> little</c><00:06:34.000><c> bit</c><00:06:34.160><c> more</c><00:06:34.400><c> seriously.</c>

00:06:34.790 --> 00:06:34.800 align:start position:0%
talk maybe a little bit more seriously.
 

00:06:34.800 --> 00:06:36.070 align:start position:0%
talk maybe a little bit more seriously.
The<00:06:34.960><c> big</c><00:06:35.120><c> thing</c><00:06:35.280><c> I</c><00:06:35.440><c> kind</c><00:06:35.600><c> of</c><00:06:35.680><c> have</c><00:06:35.759><c> a</c><00:06:35.919><c> problem</c>

00:06:36.070 --> 00:06:36.080 align:start position:0%
The big thing I kind of have a problem
 

00:06:36.080 --> 00:06:38.550 align:start position:0%
The big thing I kind of have a problem
with<00:06:36.319><c> all</c><00:06:36.479><c> of</c><00:06:36.560><c> this</c><00:06:37.120><c> is</c><00:06:37.440><c> not</c><00:06:37.840><c> that</c><00:06:38.240><c> these</c>

00:06:38.550 --> 00:06:38.560 align:start position:0%
with all of this is not that these
 

00:06:38.560 --> 00:06:40.390 align:start position:0%
with all of this is not that these
questions<00:06:38.880><c> are</c><00:06:39.120><c> complete</c><00:06:39.440><c> nonsense.</c><00:06:40.000><c> I</c><00:06:40.160><c> mean,</c>

00:06:40.390 --> 00:06:40.400 align:start position:0%
questions are complete nonsense. I mean,
 

00:06:40.400 --> 00:06:42.710 align:start position:0%
questions are complete nonsense. I mean,
even<00:06:40.720><c> though</c><00:06:41.039><c> the</c><00:06:41.360><c> story</c><00:06:41.840><c> points</c><00:06:42.240><c> to</c>

00:06:42.710 --> 00:06:42.720 align:start position:0%
even though the story points to
 

00:06:42.720 --> 00:06:45.189 align:start position:0%
even though the story points to
impressions<00:06:43.360><c> was</c><00:06:43.680><c> hilariously</c><00:06:44.479><c> able</c><00:06:44.720><c> to</c><00:06:44.880><c> draw</c>

00:06:45.189 --> 00:06:45.199 align:start position:0%
impressions was hilariously able to draw
 

00:06:45.199 --> 00:06:47.189 align:start position:0%
impressions was hilariously able to draw
out<00:06:45.520><c> actually</c><00:06:45.759><c> a</c><00:06:46.000><c> common</c><00:06:46.319><c> denominator.</c><00:06:46.960><c> The</c>

00:06:47.189 --> 00:06:47.199 align:start position:0%
out actually a common denominator. The
 

00:06:47.199 --> 00:06:49.510 align:start position:0%
out actually a common denominator. The
real<00:06:47.440><c> problem</c><00:06:47.840><c> is</c><00:06:48.080><c> that</c><00:06:48.400><c> sometimes</c><00:06:48.960><c> I</c><00:06:49.280><c> don't</c>

00:06:49.510 --> 00:06:49.520 align:start position:0%
real problem is that sometimes I don't
 

00:06:49.520 --> 00:06:51.270 align:start position:0%
real problem is that sometimes I don't
know<00:06:49.680><c> how</c><00:06:49.919><c> things</c><00:06:50.240><c> work.</c><00:06:50.639><c> You</c><00:06:50.800><c> know,</c><00:06:50.960><c> I</c>

00:06:51.270 --> 00:06:51.280 align:start position:0%
know how things work. You know, I
 

00:06:51.280 --> 00:06:53.350 align:start position:0%
know how things work. You know, I
largely<00:06:51.759><c> have</c><00:06:52.000><c> built</c><00:06:52.319><c> tools.</c><00:06:52.880><c> So,</c><00:06:53.039><c> I'm</c><00:06:53.199><c> much</c>

00:06:53.350 --> 00:06:53.360 align:start position:0%
largely have built tools. So, I'm much
 

00:06:53.360 --> 00:06:54.790 align:start position:0%
largely have built tools. So, I'm much
weaker.<00:06:53.759><c> Say</c><00:06:54.000><c> if</c><00:06:54.080><c> you're</c><00:06:54.240><c> like,</c><00:06:54.319><c> "Hey,</c><00:06:54.639><c> give</c>

00:06:54.790 --> 00:06:54.800 align:start position:0%
weaker. Say if you're like, "Hey, give
 

00:06:54.800 --> 00:06:56.469 align:start position:0%
weaker. Say if you're like, "Hey, give
me<00:06:54.880><c> a</c><00:06:55.039><c> bunch</c><00:06:55.120><c> of</c><00:06:55.280><c> stuff</c><00:06:55.440><c> with</c><00:06:55.600><c> databases</c><00:06:56.240><c> or</c>

00:06:56.469 --> 00:06:56.479 align:start position:0%
me a bunch of stuff with databases or
 

00:06:56.479 --> 00:06:57.830 align:start position:0%
me a bunch of stuff with databases or
give<00:06:56.639><c> me</c><00:06:56.720><c> a</c><00:06:56.880><c> bunch</c><00:06:56.960><c> of</c><00:06:57.039><c> stuff</c><00:06:57.199><c> with</c><00:06:57.360><c> how</c><00:06:57.520><c> React</c>

00:06:57.830 --> 00:06:57.840 align:start position:0%
give me a bunch of stuff with how React
 

00:06:57.840 --> 00:06:58.870 align:start position:0%
give me a bunch of stuff with how React
works."<00:06:58.080><c> You</c><00:06:58.160><c> know,</c><00:06:58.240><c> it's</c><00:06:58.319><c> just</c><00:06:58.479><c> like</c><00:06:58.560><c> I'm</c><00:06:58.720><c> not</c>

00:06:58.870 --> 00:06:58.880 align:start position:0%
works." You know, it's just like I'm not
 

00:06:58.880 --> 00:07:00.070 align:start position:0%
works." You know, it's just like I'm not
going<00:06:58.960><c> to</c><00:06:59.039><c> be</c><00:06:59.120><c> as</c><00:06:59.360><c> strong</c><00:06:59.520><c> as</c><00:06:59.680><c> if</c><00:06:59.840><c> you're</c><00:07:00.000><c> just</c>

00:07:00.070 --> 00:07:00.080 align:start position:0%
going to be as strong as if you're just
 

00:07:00.080 --> 00:07:02.150 align:start position:0%
going to be as strong as if you're just
like,<00:07:00.160><c> "Hey,</c><00:07:00.880><c> how</c><00:07:01.039><c> do</c><00:07:01.199><c> I</c><00:07:01.520><c> do</c><00:07:01.680><c> this</c><00:07:01.919><c> with</c>

00:07:02.150 --> 00:07:02.160 align:start position:0%
like, "Hey, how do I do this with
 

00:07:02.160 --> 00:07:04.550 align:start position:0%
like, "Hey, how do I do this with
Treesitter<00:07:02.800><c> or</c><00:07:03.039><c> how</c><00:07:03.280><c> do</c><00:07:03.440><c> I</c><00:07:03.680><c> open</c><00:07:03.919><c> up</c><00:07:04.080><c> Vim</c><00:07:04.400><c> and</c>

00:07:04.550 --> 00:07:04.560 align:start position:0%
Treesitter or how do I open up Vim and
 

00:07:04.560 --> 00:07:06.309 align:start position:0%
Treesitter or how do I open up Vim and
create<00:07:04.800><c> Windows?"</c><00:07:05.199><c> Like,</c><00:07:05.440><c> I</c><00:07:05.680><c> know</c><00:07:05.840><c> how</c><00:07:06.000><c> to</c><00:07:06.160><c> use</c>

00:07:06.309 --> 00:07:06.319 align:start position:0%
create Windows?" Like, I know how to use
 

00:07:06.319 --> 00:07:08.070 align:start position:0%
create Windows?" Like, I know how to use
the<00:07:06.560><c> tools</c><00:07:06.880><c> and</c><00:07:07.120><c> the</c><00:07:07.280><c> standard</c><00:07:07.680><c> ins</c><00:07:07.919><c> and</c>

00:07:08.070 --> 00:07:08.080 align:start position:0%
the tools and the standard ins and
 

00:07:08.080 --> 00:07:09.670 align:start position:0%
the tools and the standard ins and
standard<00:07:08.479><c> outs.</c><00:07:08.720><c> So</c><00:07:08.880><c> when</c><00:07:09.039><c> I</c><00:07:09.199><c> ask</c><00:07:09.360><c> questions,</c>

00:07:09.670 --> 00:07:09.680 align:start position:0%
standard outs. So when I ask questions,
 

00:07:09.680 --> 00:07:11.270 align:start position:0%
standard outs. So when I ask questions,
I<00:07:09.919><c> generally</c><00:07:10.240><c> know</c><00:07:10.400><c> how</c><00:07:10.560><c> to</c><00:07:10.720><c> phrase</c><00:07:10.880><c> them.</c><00:07:11.199><c> But</c>

00:07:11.270 --> 00:07:11.280 align:start position:0%
I generally know how to phrase them. But
 

00:07:11.280 --> 00:07:13.430 align:start position:0%
I generally know how to phrase them. But
what<00:07:11.440><c> if</c><00:07:12.000><c> what</c><00:07:12.240><c> I'm</c><00:07:12.479><c> asking</c><00:07:12.800><c> or</c><00:07:13.039><c> what</c><00:07:13.199><c> I'm</c>

00:07:13.430 --> 00:07:13.440 align:start position:0%
what if what I'm asking or what I'm
 

00:07:13.440 --> 00:07:15.749 align:start position:0%
what if what I'm asking or what I'm
learning,<00:07:14.000><c> I'm</c><00:07:14.319><c> really</c><00:07:14.560><c> just</c><00:07:14.880><c> fundamentally</c>

00:07:15.749 --> 00:07:15.759 align:start position:0%
learning, I'm really just fundamentally
 

00:07:15.759 --> 00:07:18.230 align:start position:0%
learning, I'm really just fundamentally
asking<00:07:16.240><c> bad</c><00:07:16.639><c> questions</c><00:07:17.120><c> and</c><00:07:17.360><c> the</c><00:07:17.599><c> AI</c><00:07:18.000><c> through</c>

00:07:18.230 --> 00:07:18.240 align:start position:0%
asking bad questions and the AI through
 

00:07:18.240 --> 00:07:21.670 align:start position:0%
asking bad questions and the AI through
its<00:07:18.479><c> sickensy</c><00:07:19.599><c> just</c><00:07:19.840><c> will</c><00:07:20.240><c> answer</c><00:07:20.560><c> them</c><00:07:21.120><c> with</c>

00:07:21.670 --> 00:07:21.680 align:start position:0%
its sickensy just will answer them with
 

00:07:21.680 --> 00:07:23.749 align:start position:0%
its sickensy just will answer them with
amazing<00:07:22.319><c> precision.</c><00:07:22.880><c> Okay,</c><00:07:23.199><c> we're</c><00:07:23.520><c> talking</c>

00:07:23.749 --> 00:07:23.759 align:start position:0%
amazing precision. Okay, we're talking
 

00:07:23.759 --> 00:07:26.870 align:start position:0%
amazing precision. Okay, we're talking
about<00:07:24.319><c> 30,000</c><00:07:25.120><c> impressions</c><00:07:25.680><c> per</c><00:07:26.080><c> story</c><00:07:26.560><c> point</c>

00:07:26.870 --> 00:07:26.880 align:start position:0%
about 30,000 impressions per story point
 

00:07:26.880 --> 00:07:28.710 align:start position:0%
about 30,000 impressions per story point
in,<00:07:27.199><c> you</c><00:07:27.360><c> know,</c><00:07:27.520><c> precision.</c><00:07:28.160><c> This</c><00:07:28.400><c> could</c>

00:07:28.710 --> 00:07:28.720 align:start position:0%
in, you know, precision. This could
 

00:07:28.720 --> 00:07:32.309 align:start position:0%
in, you know, precision. This could
severely<00:07:29.520><c> make</c><00:07:29.840><c> your</c><00:07:30.160><c> education</c><00:07:31.280><c> just</c><00:07:31.599><c> go</c><00:07:32.000><c> all</c>

00:07:32.309 --> 00:07:32.319 align:start position:0%
severely make your education just go all
 

00:07:32.319 --> 00:07:34.390 align:start position:0%
severely make your education just go all
sorts<00:07:32.639><c> of</c><00:07:32.880><c> wonky.</c><00:07:33.599><c> It's</c><00:07:33.919><c> just</c><00:07:34.080><c> kind</c><00:07:34.240><c> of</c>

00:07:34.390 --> 00:07:34.400 align:start position:0%
sorts of wonky. It's just kind of
 

00:07:34.400 --> 00:07:35.990 align:start position:0%
sorts of wonky. It's just kind of
shocking<00:07:34.880><c> because</c><00:07:35.199><c> because</c><00:07:35.599><c> what</c><00:07:35.759><c> it</c>

00:07:35.990 --> 00:07:36.000 align:start position:0%
shocking because because what it
 

00:07:36.000 --> 00:07:37.830 align:start position:0%
shocking because because what it
requires<00:07:36.479><c> like</c><00:07:36.639><c> if</c><00:07:36.880><c> you</c><00:07:36.960><c> look</c><00:07:37.039><c> at</c><00:07:37.199><c> this</c><00:07:37.360><c> graph</c>

00:07:37.830 --> 00:07:37.840 align:start position:0%
requires like if you look at this graph
 

00:07:37.840 --> 00:07:41.110 align:start position:0%
requires like if you look at this graph
it<00:07:38.080><c> requires</c><00:07:38.560><c> the</c><00:07:39.039><c> student</c><00:07:39.840><c> to</c><00:07:40.160><c> know</c><00:07:40.479><c> how</c><00:07:40.800><c> to</c>

00:07:41.110 --> 00:07:41.120 align:start position:0%
it requires the student to know how to
 

00:07:41.120 --> 00:07:43.350 align:start position:0%
it requires the student to know how to
ask<00:07:41.360><c> the</c><00:07:41.680><c> question</c><00:07:42.400><c> because</c><00:07:42.639><c> the</c><00:07:42.960><c> professor</c>

00:07:43.350 --> 00:07:43.360 align:start position:0%
ask the question because the professor
 

00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:46.070 align:start position:0%
ask the question because the professor
you're<00:07:43.759><c> working</c><00:07:43.919><c> with</c><00:07:44.639><c> even</c><00:07:44.960><c> though</c><00:07:45.599><c> knows</c>

00:07:46.070 --> 00:07:46.080 align:start position:0%
you're working with even though knows
 

00:07:46.080 --> 00:07:48.309 align:start position:0%
you're working with even though knows
every<00:07:46.479><c> single</c><00:07:46.800><c> topic</c><00:07:47.120><c> under</c><00:07:47.440><c> the</c><00:07:47.599><c> sun</c>

00:07:48.309 --> 00:07:48.319 align:start position:0%
every single topic under the sun
 

00:07:48.319 --> 00:07:51.029 align:start position:0%
every single topic under the sun
multiple<00:07:48.960><c> PhD</c><00:07:49.680><c> polyglot</c><00:07:50.479><c> we're</c><00:07:50.720><c> talking</c>

00:07:51.029 --> 00:07:51.039 align:start position:0%
multiple PhD polyglot we're talking
 

00:07:51.039 --> 00:07:53.189 align:start position:0%
multiple PhD polyglot we're talking
about<00:07:51.440><c> polyamorous</c><00:07:52.319><c> when</c><00:07:52.560><c> it</c><00:07:52.639><c> comes</c><00:07:52.800><c> to</c><00:07:52.960><c> book</c>

00:07:53.189 --> 00:07:53.199 align:start position:0%
about polyamorous when it comes to book
 

00:07:53.199 --> 00:07:55.110 align:start position:0%
about polyamorous when it comes to book
studies<00:07:53.840><c> doesn't</c><00:07:54.160><c> know</c><00:07:54.319><c> how</c><00:07:54.479><c> to</c><00:07:54.639><c> answer</c><00:07:54.879><c> a</c>

00:07:55.110 --> 00:07:55.120 align:start position:0%
studies doesn't know how to answer a
 

00:07:55.120 --> 00:07:56.869 align:start position:0%
studies doesn't know how to answer a
question<00:07:55.360><c> without</c><00:07:55.759><c> just</c><00:07:56.000><c> going</c><00:07:56.319><c> completely</c>

00:07:56.869 --> 00:07:56.879 align:start position:0%
question without just going completely
 

00:07:56.879 --> 00:07:58.469 align:start position:0%
question without just going completely
insane.<00:07:57.440><c> This</c><00:07:57.680><c> actually</c><00:07:57.919><c> kind</c><00:07:58.000><c> of</c><00:07:58.080><c> makes</c><00:07:58.319><c> me</c>

00:07:58.469 --> 00:07:58.479 align:start position:0%
insane. This actually kind of makes me
 

00:07:58.479 --> 00:08:01.189 align:start position:0%
insane. This actually kind of makes me
realize<00:07:58.800><c> that</c><00:07:59.120><c> gypies</c><00:07:59.919><c> for</c><00:08:00.160><c> education</c><00:08:00.879><c> could</c>

00:08:01.189 --> 00:08:01.199 align:start position:0%
realize that gypies for education could
 

00:08:01.199 --> 00:08:03.510 align:start position:0%
realize that gypies for education could
actually<00:08:01.440><c> be</c><00:08:01.759><c> not</c><00:08:02.240><c> uh</c><00:08:02.400><c> that</c><00:08:02.720><c> fantastic.</c><00:08:03.360><c> And</c>

00:08:03.510 --> 00:08:03.520 align:start position:0%
actually be not uh that fantastic. And
 

00:08:03.520 --> 00:08:05.110 align:start position:0%
actually be not uh that fantastic. And
even<00:08:03.680><c> more</c><00:08:04.080><c> like</c><00:08:04.240><c> the</c><00:08:04.400><c> bigger</c><00:08:04.639><c> thing</c><00:08:04.720><c> is</c><00:08:04.879><c> these</c>

00:08:05.110 --> 00:08:05.120 align:start position:0%
even more like the bigger thing is these
 

00:08:05.120 --> 00:08:06.710 align:start position:0%
even more like the bigger thing is these
questions<00:08:05.440><c> were</c><00:08:05.680><c> just</c><00:08:05.919><c> outstandingly</c>

00:08:06.710 --> 00:08:06.720 align:start position:0%
questions were just outstandingly
 

00:08:06.720 --> 00:08:08.469 align:start position:0%
questions were just outstandingly
gibberish,<00:08:07.360><c> right?</c><00:08:07.599><c> When</c><00:08:07.759><c> you</c><00:08:07.840><c> read</c><00:08:08.000><c> them</c>

00:08:08.469 --> 00:08:08.479 align:start position:0%
gibberish, right? When you read them
 

00:08:08.479 --> 00:08:10.150 align:start position:0%
gibberish, right? When you read them
like<00:08:08.639><c> as</c><00:08:08.879><c> a</c><00:08:09.039><c> human,</c><00:08:09.280><c> you're</c><00:08:09.520><c> just</c><00:08:09.680><c> like</c><00:08:09.919><c> what</c>

00:08:10.150 --> 00:08:10.160 align:start position:0%
like as a human, you're just like what
 

00:08:10.160 --> 00:08:12.469 align:start position:0%
like as a human, you're just like what
the<00:08:10.400><c> hell</c><00:08:10.720><c> are</c><00:08:10.879><c> you</c><00:08:11.199><c> exactly</c><00:08:11.759><c> saying?</c><00:08:12.160><c> But</c>

00:08:12.469 --> 00:08:12.479 align:start position:0%
the hell are you exactly saying? But
 

00:08:12.479 --> 00:08:14.230 align:start position:0%
the hell are you exactly saying? But
what<00:08:12.720><c> about</c><00:08:13.039><c> questions</c><00:08:13.280><c> that</c><00:08:13.520><c> are</c><00:08:13.680><c> only,</c><00:08:14.080><c> you</c>

00:08:14.230 --> 00:08:14.240 align:start position:0%
what about questions that are only, you
 

00:08:14.240 --> 00:08:18.070 align:start position:0%
what about questions that are only, you
know,<00:08:14.560><c> 10%</c><00:08:15.120><c> or</c><00:08:15.440><c> 5%</c><00:08:16.000><c> or</c><00:08:16.319><c> 1%</c><00:08:16.960><c> gibberish?</c><00:08:17.520><c> What</c><00:08:17.680><c> if</c>

00:08:18.070 --> 00:08:18.080 align:start position:0%
know, 10% or 5% or 1% gibberish? What if
 

00:08:18.080 --> 00:08:20.070 align:start position:0%
know, 10% or 5% or 1% gibberish? What if
you're<00:08:18.240><c> just</c><00:08:18.400><c> asking</c><00:08:18.879><c> something</c><00:08:19.440><c> that's</c><00:08:19.759><c> just</c>

00:08:20.070 --> 00:08:20.080 align:start position:0%
you're just asking something that's just
 

00:08:20.080 --> 00:08:22.629 align:start position:0%
you're just asking something that's just
not<00:08:20.400><c> a</c><00:08:20.720><c> good</c><00:08:21.120><c> idea?</c><00:08:21.759><c> Like</c><00:08:22.000><c> say</c><00:08:22.240><c> how</c><00:08:22.479><c> to</c>

00:08:22.629 --> 00:08:22.639 align:start position:0%
not a good idea? Like say how to
 

00:08:22.639 --> 00:08:24.309 align:start position:0%
not a good idea? Like say how to
implement<00:08:23.039><c> something.</c><00:08:23.520><c> that's</c><00:08:23.759><c> say</c><00:08:24.000><c> giving</c>

00:08:24.309 --> 00:08:24.319 align:start position:0%
implement something. that's say giving
 

00:08:24.319 --> 00:08:27.749 align:start position:0%
implement something. that's say giving
some<00:08:24.560><c> sort</c><00:08:24.720><c> of</c><00:08:24.879><c> n^2</c><00:08:25.919><c> n</c><00:08:26.240><c> to</c><00:08:26.400><c> the3r</c><00:08:27.039><c> power</c><00:08:27.520><c> kind</c>

00:08:27.749 --> 00:08:27.759 align:start position:0%
some sort of n^2 n to the3r power kind
 

00:08:27.759 --> 00:08:29.909 align:start position:0%
some sort of n^2 n to the3r power kind
of<00:08:28.000><c> solution</c><00:08:28.800><c> but</c><00:08:29.039><c> because</c><00:08:29.360><c> that's</c><00:08:29.680><c> what</c>

00:08:29.909 --> 00:08:29.919 align:start position:0%
of solution but because that's what
 

00:08:29.919 --> 00:08:32.949 align:start position:0%
of solution but because that's what
you're<00:08:30.160><c> asking</c><00:08:30.479><c> GPD</c><00:08:30.879><c> is</c><00:08:31.039><c> like</c><00:08:31.440><c> well</c><00:08:31.759><c> actually</c>

00:08:32.949 --> 00:08:32.959 align:start position:0%
you're asking GPD is like well actually
 

00:08:32.959 --> 00:08:37.190 align:start position:0%
you're asking GPD is like well actually
uh<00:08:33.279><c> uh</c><00:08:33.599><c> uh</c><00:08:35.039><c> well</c><00:08:35.360><c> well</c><00:08:35.919><c> actually</c><00:08:36.560><c> this</c><00:08:36.800><c> is</c><00:08:36.959><c> how</c>

00:08:37.190 --> 00:08:37.200 align:start position:0%
uh uh uh well well actually this is how
 

00:08:37.200 --> 00:08:41.350 align:start position:0%
uh uh uh well well actually this is how
you<00:08:37.440><c> solve</c><00:08:37.760><c> it.</c>

00:08:41.350 --> 00:08:41.360 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:08:41.360 --> 00:08:43.509 align:start position:0%
 
That's<00:08:41.599><c> not</c><00:08:41.760><c> that</c><00:08:42.000><c> good.</c><00:08:42.320><c> That's</c><00:08:42.640><c> not</c><00:08:43.039><c> really</c>

00:08:43.509 --> 00:08:43.519 align:start position:0%
That's not that good. That's not really
 

00:08:43.519 --> 00:08:45.430 align:start position:0%
That's not that good. That's not really
what<00:08:43.839><c> you</c><00:08:44.080><c> want</c><00:08:44.320><c> when</c><00:08:44.560><c> you're</c><00:08:44.720><c> learning.</c><00:08:45.200><c> You</c>

00:08:45.430 --> 00:08:45.440 align:start position:0%
what you want when you're learning. You
 

00:08:45.440 --> 00:08:47.509 align:start position:0%
what you want when you're learning. You
want<00:08:46.080><c> someone</c><00:08:46.399><c> that</c><00:08:46.640><c> actually</c><00:08:46.880><c> pushes</c><00:08:47.360><c> back</c>

00:08:47.509 --> 00:08:47.519 align:start position:0%
want someone that actually pushes back
 

00:08:47.519 --> 00:08:50.150 align:start position:0%
want someone that actually pushes back
on<00:08:47.760><c> you</c><00:08:48.160><c> and</c><00:08:48.480><c> pushes</c><00:08:48.800><c> you</c><00:08:49.040><c> towards</c><00:08:49.600><c> correct.</c>

00:08:50.150 --> 00:08:50.160 align:start position:0%
on you and pushes you towards correct.
 

00:08:50.160 --> 00:08:51.509 align:start position:0%
on you and pushes you towards correct.
There's<00:08:50.399><c> this</c><00:08:50.560><c> quote</c><00:08:50.800><c> that</c><00:08:51.040><c> keeps</c><00:08:51.279><c> on</c>

00:08:51.509 --> 00:08:51.519 align:start position:0%
There's this quote that keeps on
 

00:08:51.519 --> 00:08:53.750 align:start position:0%
There's this quote that keeps on
bouncing<00:08:51.920><c> around</c><00:08:52.240><c> in</c><00:08:52.480><c> my</c><00:08:52.640><c> head</c><00:08:52.880><c> and</c><00:08:53.440><c> uh</c><00:08:53.519><c> I</c>

00:08:53.750 --> 00:08:53.760 align:start position:0%
bouncing around in my head and uh I
 

00:08:53.760 --> 00:08:55.269 align:start position:0%
bouncing around in my head and uh I
think<00:08:53.839><c> it</c><00:08:54.080><c> really</c><00:08:54.320><c> applies</c><00:08:54.640><c> here</c><00:08:54.880><c> which</c><00:08:55.040><c> is</c>

00:08:55.269 --> 00:08:55.279 align:start position:0%
think it really applies here which is
 

00:08:55.279 --> 00:08:57.829 align:start position:0%
think it really applies here which is
models<00:08:56.000><c> are</c><00:08:56.320><c> extremely</c><00:08:57.040><c> intelligent</c><00:08:57.600><c> but</c>

00:08:57.829 --> 00:08:57.839 align:start position:0%
models are extremely intelligent but
 

00:08:57.839 --> 00:08:59.829 align:start position:0%
models are extremely intelligent but
they<00:08:58.160><c> comprehend</c><00:08:58.800><c> nothing</c><00:08:59.279><c> and</c><00:08:59.440><c> this</c><00:08:59.680><c> makes</c>

00:08:59.829 --> 00:08:59.839 align:start position:0%
they comprehend nothing and this makes
 

00:08:59.839 --> 00:09:03.190 align:start position:0%
they comprehend nothing and this makes
me<00:09:00.080><c> a</c><00:09:00.320><c> lot</c><00:09:00.959><c> less</c><00:09:01.360><c> bullish</c><00:09:02.240><c> when</c><00:09:02.480><c> it</c><00:09:02.720><c> comes</c><00:09:02.880><c> to</c>

00:09:03.190 --> 00:09:03.200 align:start position:0%
me a lot less bullish when it comes to
 

00:09:03.200 --> 00:09:04.949 align:start position:0%
me a lot less bullish when it comes to
education<00:09:03.680><c> with</c><00:09:03.920><c> these</c><00:09:04.160><c> models</c><00:09:04.480><c> at</c><00:09:04.560><c> least</c><00:09:04.800><c> in</c>

00:09:04.949 --> 00:09:04.959 align:start position:0%
education with these models at least in
 

00:09:04.959 --> 00:09:07.430 align:start position:0%
education with these models at least in
this<00:09:05.360><c> this</c><00:09:05.760><c> kind</c><00:09:05.920><c> of</c><00:09:06.080><c> lifestyle.</c><00:09:06.640><c> Yes,</c><00:09:06.959><c> Claude</c>

00:09:07.430 --> 00:09:07.440 align:start position:0%
this this kind of lifestyle. Yes, Claude
 

00:09:07.440 --> 00:09:09.509 align:start position:0%
this this kind of lifestyle. Yes, Claude
obviously<00:09:07.920><c> did</c><00:09:08.160><c> a</c><00:09:08.480><c> really</c><00:09:08.720><c> good</c><00:09:08.880><c> job.</c><00:09:09.200><c> Like</c><00:09:09.360><c> if</c>

00:09:09.509 --> 00:09:09.519 align:start position:0%
obviously did a really good job. Like if
 

00:09:09.519 --> 00:09:11.030 align:start position:0%
obviously did a really good job. Like if
you<00:09:09.600><c> look</c><00:09:09.680><c> at</c><00:09:09.760><c> the</c><00:09:09.920><c> scores</c><00:09:10.240><c> the</c><00:09:10.399><c> newer</c><00:09:10.640><c> Claude</c>

00:09:11.030 --> 00:09:11.040 align:start position:0%
you look at the scores the newer Claude
 

00:09:11.040 --> 00:09:13.350 align:start position:0%
you look at the scores the newer Claude
hey<00:09:11.680><c> good</c><00:09:11.920><c> job</c><00:09:12.240><c> but</c><00:09:12.399><c> all</c><00:09:12.640><c> these</c><00:09:12.880><c> questions</c>

00:09:13.350 --> 00:09:13.360 align:start position:0%
hey good job but all these questions
 

00:09:13.360 --> 00:09:15.350 align:start position:0%
hey good job but all these questions
were<00:09:13.600><c> just</c><00:09:13.760><c> absurd.</c><00:09:14.399><c> So</c><00:09:14.560><c> what</c><00:09:14.800><c> happens</c><00:09:15.120><c> when</c>

00:09:15.350 --> 00:09:15.360 align:start position:0%
were just absurd. So what happens when
 

00:09:15.360 --> 00:09:18.070 align:start position:0%
were just absurd. So what happens when
you<00:09:15.519><c> only</c><00:09:15.760><c> have</c><00:09:15.920><c> just</c><00:09:16.160><c> like</c><00:09:16.800><c> very</c><00:09:17.200><c> subtly</c><00:09:17.760><c> off</c>

00:09:18.070 --> 00:09:18.080 align:start position:0%
you only have just like very subtly off
 

00:09:18.080 --> 00:09:19.430 align:start position:0%
you only have just like very subtly off
questions?<00:09:18.480><c> What</c><00:09:18.640><c> does</c><00:09:18.800><c> Claude</c><00:09:19.120><c> do?</c><00:09:19.279><c> Does</c>

00:09:19.430 --> 00:09:19.440 align:start position:0%
questions? What does Claude do? Does
 

00:09:19.440 --> 00:09:21.030 align:start position:0%
questions? What does Claude do? Does
Claude<00:09:19.839><c> always</c><00:09:20.160><c> push</c><00:09:20.399><c> back?</c><00:09:20.640><c> Does</c><00:09:20.800><c> Claude</c>

00:09:21.030 --> 00:09:21.040 align:start position:0%
Claude always push back? Does Claude
 

00:09:21.040 --> 00:09:22.470 align:start position:0%
Claude always push back? Does Claude
even<00:09:21.279><c> know</c><00:09:21.360><c> what</c><00:09:21.519><c> the</c><00:09:21.760><c> right</c><00:09:21.920><c> answer</c><00:09:22.160><c> is</c><00:09:22.320><c> in</c>

00:09:22.470 --> 00:09:22.480 align:start position:0%
even know what the right answer is in
 

00:09:22.480 --> 00:09:25.030 align:start position:0%
even know what the right answer is in
those<00:09:22.640><c> cases?</c><00:09:23.200><c> Even</c><00:09:23.440><c> more</c><00:09:23.680><c> so,</c><00:09:24.160><c> sometimes</c><00:09:24.640><c> I</c>

00:09:25.030 --> 00:09:25.040 align:start position:0%
those cases? Even more so, sometimes I
 

00:09:25.040 --> 00:09:27.430 align:start position:0%
those cases? Even more so, sometimes I
solve<00:09:25.360><c> problems</c><00:09:25.760><c> in</c><00:09:26.000><c> just</c><00:09:26.240><c> the</c><00:09:26.399><c> dumbest</c><00:09:26.880><c> way.</c>

00:09:27.430 --> 00:09:27.440 align:start position:0%
solve problems in just the dumbest way.
 

00:09:27.440 --> 00:09:29.590 align:start position:0%
solve problems in just the dumbest way.
And<00:09:27.600><c> yes,</c><00:09:28.000><c> you're</c><00:09:28.320><c> totally</c><00:09:28.880><c> able</c><00:09:29.120><c> to</c><00:09:29.360><c> solve</c>

00:09:29.590 --> 00:09:29.600 align:start position:0%
And yes, you're totally able to solve
 

00:09:29.600 --> 00:09:31.910 align:start position:0%
And yes, you're totally able to solve
the<00:09:29.839><c> problem</c><00:09:30.160><c> in</c><00:09:30.399><c> this</c><00:09:30.720><c> really</c><00:09:31.040><c> dumb</c><00:09:31.360><c> way.</c><00:09:31.760><c> But</c>

00:09:31.910 --> 00:09:31.920 align:start position:0%
the problem in this really dumb way. But
 

00:09:31.920 --> 00:09:33.750 align:start position:0%
the problem in this really dumb way. But
since<00:09:32.160><c> Claude</c><00:09:32.560><c> does</c><00:09:32.720><c> not</c><00:09:32.959><c> have</c><00:09:33.200><c> like</c><00:09:33.440><c> the</c>

00:09:33.750 --> 00:09:33.760 align:start position:0%
since Claude does not have like the
 

00:09:33.760 --> 00:09:35.910 align:start position:0%
since Claude does not have like the
context<00:09:34.160><c> of</c><00:09:34.399><c> the</c><00:09:34.560><c> greater</c><00:09:35.200><c> problem</c><00:09:35.440><c> that</c><00:09:35.680><c> I'm</c>

00:09:35.910 --> 00:09:35.920 align:start position:0%
context of the greater problem that I'm
 

00:09:35.920 --> 00:09:37.910 align:start position:0%
context of the greater problem that I'm
working<00:09:36.080><c> on,</c><00:09:36.560><c> it</c><00:09:36.800><c> could</c><00:09:37.040><c> easily</c><00:09:37.600><c> just</c>

00:09:37.910 --> 00:09:37.920 align:start position:0%
working on, it could easily just
 

00:09:37.920 --> 00:09:39.590 align:start position:0%
working on, it could easily just
encourage<00:09:38.320><c> me</c><00:09:38.480><c> and</c><00:09:38.720><c> help</c><00:09:38.880><c> me</c><00:09:39.040><c> to</c><00:09:39.200><c> really</c>

00:09:39.590 --> 00:09:39.600 align:start position:0%
encourage me and help me to really
 

00:09:39.600 --> 00:09:42.470 align:start position:0%
encourage me and help me to really
finish<00:09:39.920><c> off</c><00:09:40.160><c> the</c><00:09:40.480><c> solution</c><00:09:41.360><c> in</c><00:09:41.680><c> that</c><00:09:42.080><c> really</c>

00:09:42.470 --> 00:09:42.480 align:start position:0%
finish off the solution in that really
 

00:09:42.480 --> 00:09:44.470 align:start position:0%
finish off the solution in that really
dumb<00:09:42.959><c> way.</c><00:09:43.360><c> Which</c><00:09:43.519><c> comes</c><00:09:43.760><c> back</c><00:09:43.920><c> to</c><00:09:44.080><c> one</c><00:09:44.240><c> of</c><00:09:44.320><c> the</c>

00:09:44.470 --> 00:09:44.480 align:start position:0%
dumb way. Which comes back to one of the
 

00:09:44.480 --> 00:09:46.550 align:start position:0%
dumb way. Which comes back to one of the
most<00:09:44.640><c> terrifying</c><00:09:45.200><c> things</c><00:09:45.519><c> about</c><00:09:45.920><c> AI</c><00:09:46.399><c> in</c>

00:09:46.550 --> 00:09:46.560 align:start position:0%
most terrifying things about AI in
 

00:09:46.560 --> 00:09:49.190 align:start position:0%
most terrifying things about AI in
general.<00:09:47.200><c> See,</c><00:09:47.760><c> back</c><00:09:48.000><c> in</c><00:09:48.240><c> the</c><00:09:48.399><c> day,</c><00:09:48.800><c> we</c><00:09:49.040><c> used</c>

00:09:49.190 --> 00:09:49.200 align:start position:0%
general. See, back in the day, we used
 

00:09:49.200 --> 00:09:50.949 align:start position:0%
general. See, back in the day, we used
to<00:09:49.279><c> have</c><00:09:49.440><c> this</c><00:09:49.680><c> thing</c><00:09:49.839><c> called</c><00:09:50.000><c> like</c><00:09:50.160><c> the</c><00:09:50.399><c> 10x</c>

00:09:50.949 --> 00:09:50.959 align:start position:0%
to have this thing called like the 10x
 

00:09:50.959 --> 00:09:52.310 align:start position:0%
to have this thing called like the 10x
engineer,<00:09:51.519><c> you</c><00:09:51.600><c> know</c><00:09:51.680><c> what</c><00:09:51.839><c> I</c><00:09:51.920><c> mean?</c><00:09:52.160><c> They</c>

00:09:52.310 --> 00:09:52.320 align:start position:0%
engineer, you know what I mean? They
 

00:09:52.320 --> 00:09:54.790 align:start position:0%
engineer, you know what I mean? They
typically<00:09:52.800><c> caused</c><00:09:53.200><c> about</c><00:09:53.600><c> 10x</c><00:09:54.160><c> the</c><00:09:54.399><c> amount</c><00:09:54.640><c> of</c>

00:09:54.790 --> 00:09:54.800 align:start position:0%
typically caused about 10x the amount of
 

00:09:54.800 --> 00:09:56.630 align:start position:0%
typically caused about 10x the amount of
headaches<00:09:55.200><c> and</c><00:09:55.440><c> problems</c><00:09:55.920><c> for</c><00:09:56.320><c> the</c>

00:09:56.630 --> 00:09:56.640 align:start position:0%
headaches and problems for the
 

00:09:56.640 --> 00:09:58.710 align:start position:0%
headaches and problems for the
organization.<00:09:57.519><c> But</c><00:09:57.680><c> then</c><00:09:57.839><c> there's</c><00:09:58.080><c> the</c><00:09:58.160><c> these</c>

00:09:58.710 --> 00:09:58.720 align:start position:0%
organization. But then there's the these
 

00:09:58.720 --> 00:10:01.190 align:start position:0%
organization. But then there's the these
2x<00:09:59.200><c> engineers.</c><00:09:59.680><c> They</c><00:09:59.920><c> were</c><00:10:00.160><c> fantastic.</c><00:10:00.959><c> They</c>

00:10:01.190 --> 00:10:01.200 align:start position:0%
2x engineers. They were fantastic. They
 

00:10:01.200 --> 00:10:03.110 align:start position:0%
2x engineers. They were fantastic. They
could<00:10:01.440><c> solve</c><00:10:01.760><c> problems</c><00:10:02.080><c> at</c><00:10:02.240><c> like</c><00:10:02.480><c> twice</c><00:10:02.880><c> the</c>

00:10:03.110 --> 00:10:03.120 align:start position:0%
could solve problems at like twice the
 

00:10:03.120 --> 00:10:05.350 align:start position:0%
could solve problems at like twice the
rate<00:10:03.440><c> of</c><00:10:03.680><c> everybody</c><00:10:04.160><c> else.</c><00:10:04.720><c> Everybody</c>

00:10:05.350 --> 00:10:05.360 align:start position:0%
rate of everybody else. Everybody
 

00:10:05.360 --> 00:10:07.350 align:start position:0%
rate of everybody else. Everybody
absolutely<00:10:06.160><c> loved</c><00:10:06.480><c> them.</c><00:10:06.959><c> They</c><00:10:07.200><c> are</c>

00:10:07.350 --> 00:10:07.360 align:start position:0%
absolutely loved them. They are
 

00:10:07.360 --> 00:10:09.030 align:start position:0%
absolutely loved them. They are
fantastic.<00:10:07.760><c> So,</c><00:10:07.920><c> you</c><00:10:08.080><c> could</c><00:10:08.240><c> imagine</c><00:10:08.720><c> that</c>

00:10:09.030 --> 00:10:09.040 align:start position:0%
fantastic. So, you could imagine that
 

00:10:09.040 --> 00:10:10.949 align:start position:0%
fantastic. So, you could imagine that
their<00:10:09.279><c> score</c><00:10:09.600><c> is</c><00:10:09.839><c> like</c><00:10:09.920><c> a</c><00:10:10.160><c> two.</c><00:10:10.480><c> And</c><00:10:10.640><c> then</c><00:10:10.800><c> a</c>

00:10:10.949 --> 00:10:10.959 align:start position:0%
their score is like a two. And then a
 

00:10:10.959 --> 00:10:12.630 align:start position:0%
their score is like a two. And then a
lot<00:10:11.040><c> of</c><00:10:11.120><c> the</c><00:10:11.360><c> engineers</c><00:10:11.760><c> in</c><00:10:11.920><c> the</c><00:10:12.080><c> org</c><00:10:12.399><c> were</c>

00:10:12.630 --> 00:10:12.640 align:start position:0%
lot of the engineers in the org were
 

00:10:12.640 --> 00:10:14.710 align:start position:0%
lot of the engineers in the org were
like<00:10:13.120><c> ones.</c><00:10:13.760><c> And</c><00:10:13.920><c> then</c><00:10:14.160><c> some</c><00:10:14.399><c> of</c><00:10:14.480><c> the</c>

00:10:14.710 --> 00:10:14.720 align:start position:0%
like ones. And then some of the
 

00:10:14.720 --> 00:10:17.590 align:start position:0%
like ones. And then some of the
engineers,<00:10:15.600><c> well,</c><00:10:16.160><c> they</c><00:10:16.399><c> were</c><00:10:16.640><c> 0.5</c><00:10:17.040><c> fives.</c>

00:10:17.590 --> 00:10:17.600 align:start position:0%
engineers, well, they were 0.5 fives.
 

00:10:17.600 --> 00:10:19.430 align:start position:0%
engineers, well, they were 0.5 fives.
They<00:10:17.839><c> couldn't</c><00:10:18.240><c> really</c><00:10:18.640><c> do</c><00:10:18.800><c> a</c><00:10:18.959><c> lot.</c><00:10:19.200><c> They</c>

00:10:19.430 --> 00:10:19.440 align:start position:0%
They couldn't really do a lot. They
 

00:10:19.440 --> 00:10:21.269 align:start position:0%
They couldn't really do a lot. They
required<00:10:19.680><c> a</c><00:10:19.839><c> lot</c><00:10:19.920><c> of</c><00:10:20.079><c> ones</c><00:10:20.399><c> and</c><00:10:20.560><c> twos</c><00:10:20.880><c> to</c><00:10:21.120><c> kind</c>

00:10:21.269 --> 00:10:21.279 align:start position:0%
required a lot of ones and twos to kind
 

00:10:21.279 --> 00:10:23.910 align:start position:0%
required a lot of ones and twos to kind
of<00:10:21.600><c> really</c><00:10:22.000><c> help</c><00:10:22.399><c> guide</c><00:10:22.720><c> them.</c><00:10:23.040><c> But</c><00:10:23.200><c> now</c><00:10:23.680><c> with</c>

00:10:23.910 --> 00:10:23.920 align:start position:0%
of really help guide them. But now with
 

00:10:23.920 --> 00:10:27.670 align:start position:0%
of really help guide them. But now with
the<00:10:24.240><c> power</c><00:10:24.480><c> of</c><00:10:24.720><c> AI,</c><00:10:25.600><c> the</c><00:10:25.920><c> 0.5s</c><00:10:26.880><c> can</c><00:10:27.120><c> now</c><00:10:27.440><c> make</c>

00:10:27.670 --> 00:10:27.680 align:start position:0%
the power of AI, the 0.5s can now make
 

00:10:27.680 --> 00:10:30.790 align:start position:0%
the power of AI, the 0.5s can now make
decisions<00:10:28.160><c> at</c><00:10:28.480><c> an</c><00:10:28.800><c> incredible</c><00:10:29.680><c> rate.</c><00:10:30.480><c> They</c>

00:10:30.790 --> 00:10:30.800 align:start position:0%
decisions at an incredible rate. They
 

00:10:30.800 --> 00:10:33.350 align:start position:0%
decisions at an incredible rate. They
have<00:10:31.279><c> multiplied</c><00:10:32.160><c> their</c><00:10:32.560><c> skill.</c><00:10:33.040><c> Because</c>

00:10:33.350 --> 00:10:33.360 align:start position:0%
have multiplied their skill. Because
 

00:10:33.360 --> 00:10:35.269 align:start position:0%
have multiplied their skill. Because
that's<00:10:33.760><c> really</c><00:10:34.160><c> what</c><00:10:34.399><c> this</c><00:10:34.560><c> is</c><00:10:34.800><c> saying.</c><00:10:35.120><c> This</c>

00:10:35.269 --> 00:10:35.279 align:start position:0%
that's really what this is saying. This
 

00:10:35.279 --> 00:10:37.509 align:start position:0%
that's really what this is saying. This
is<00:10:35.440><c> what</c><00:10:35.680><c> this</c><00:10:36.399><c> metric</c><00:10:36.800><c> is</c><00:10:37.040><c> saying</c>

00:10:37.509 --> 00:10:37.519 align:start position:0%
is what this metric is saying
 

00:10:37.519 --> 00:10:41.269 align:start position:0%
is what this metric is saying
is<00:10:37.760><c> that</c><00:10:38.000><c> AIs</c><00:10:38.880><c> are</c><00:10:39.279><c> absolutely</c><00:10:40.160><c> fantastic</c><00:10:41.040><c> at</c>

00:10:41.269 --> 00:10:41.279 align:start position:0%
is that AIs are absolutely fantastic at
 

00:10:41.279 --> 00:10:43.430 align:start position:0%
is that AIs are absolutely fantastic at
being<00:10:41.600><c> a</c><00:10:41.920><c> skill</c><00:10:42.399><c> multiplier.</c><00:10:43.040><c> It's</c><00:10:43.279><c> a</c>

00:10:43.430 --> 00:10:43.440 align:start position:0%
being a skill multiplier. It's a
 

00:10:43.440 --> 00:10:45.190 align:start position:0%
being a skill multiplier. It's a
coefficient<00:10:44.000><c> on</c><00:10:44.240><c> the</c><00:10:44.399><c> end</c><00:10:44.560><c> of</c><00:10:44.720><c> this.</c><00:10:44.959><c> And</c>

00:10:45.190 --> 00:10:45.200 align:start position:0%
coefficient on the end of this. And
 

00:10:45.200 --> 00:10:46.630 align:start position:0%
coefficient on the end of this. And
there's<00:10:45.360><c> a,</c><00:10:45.680><c> you</c><00:10:45.839><c> know,</c><00:10:45.920><c> there</c><00:10:46.160><c> there's</c><00:10:46.480><c> a</c>

00:10:46.630 --> 00:10:46.640 align:start position:0%
there's a, you know, there there's a
 

00:10:46.640 --> 00:10:48.150 align:start position:0%
there's a, you know, there there's a
group<00:10:46.800><c> of</c><00:10:47.040><c> there's</c><00:10:47.279><c> a</c><00:10:47.440><c> group</c><00:10:47.600><c> of</c><00:10:47.760><c> you</c><00:10:47.920><c> out</c>

00:10:48.150 --> 00:10:48.160 align:start position:0%
group of there's a group of you out
 

00:10:48.160 --> 00:10:50.069 align:start position:0%
group of there's a group of you out
there<00:10:48.640><c> and</c><00:10:48.880><c> you</c><00:10:49.040><c> know</c><00:10:49.200><c> this</c><00:10:49.440><c> to</c><00:10:49.600><c> be</c><00:10:49.680><c> true</c><00:10:49.839><c> that</c>

00:10:50.069 --> 00:10:50.079 align:start position:0%
there and you know this to be true that
 

00:10:50.079 --> 00:10:52.069 align:start position:0%
there and you know this to be true that
your<00:10:50.320><c> decision-m</c><00:10:51.279><c> is</c><00:10:51.519><c> kind</c><00:10:51.680><c> of</c><00:10:51.760><c> like</c><00:10:51.920><c> a</c>

00:10:52.069 --> 00:10:52.079 align:start position:0%
your decision-m is kind of like a
 

00:10:52.079 --> 00:10:54.150 align:start position:0%
your decision-m is kind of like a
negative<00:10:52.480><c> one.</c><00:10:52.800><c> And</c><00:10:52.959><c> so</c><00:10:53.120><c> when</c><00:10:53.360><c> you</c><00:10:53.600><c> go</c><00:10:53.760><c> from</c><00:10:54.000><c> a</c>

00:10:54.150 --> 00:10:54.160 align:start position:0%
negative one. And so when you go from a
 

00:10:54.160 --> 00:10:56.310 align:start position:0%
negative one. And so when you go from a
negative<00:10:54.480><c> one</c><00:10:54.720><c> with</c><00:10:54.959><c> a</c><00:10:55.120><c> coefficient</c><00:10:55.760><c> of</c><00:10:56.000><c> just</c>

00:10:56.310 --> 00:10:56.320 align:start position:0%
negative one with a coefficient of just
 

00:10:56.320 --> 00:10:59.990 align:start position:0%
negative one with a coefficient of just
one<00:10:56.800><c> to</c><00:10:57.040><c> a</c><00:10:57.279><c> coefficient</c><00:10:57.839><c> of</c><00:10:58.079><c> 10,</c><00:10:59.040><c> Lord</c><00:10:59.760><c> help</c>

00:10:59.990 --> 00:11:00.000 align:start position:0%
one to a coefficient of 10, Lord help
 

00:11:00.000 --> 00:11:02.069 align:start position:0%
one to a coefficient of 10, Lord help
the<00:11:00.320><c> organization</c><00:11:00.959><c> that</c><00:11:01.279><c> you're</c><00:11:01.440><c> a</c><00:11:01.600><c> part</c><00:11:01.760><c> of.</c>

00:11:02.069 --> 00:11:02.079 align:start position:0%
the organization that you're a part of.
 

00:11:02.079 --> 00:11:04.870 align:start position:0%
the organization that you're a part of.
And<00:11:02.240><c> that</c><00:11:02.560><c> my</c><00:11:02.720><c> friends</c><00:11:03.920><c> is</c><00:11:04.079><c> the</c>

00:11:04.870 --> 00:11:04.880 align:start position:0%
And that my friends is the
 

00:11:04.880 --> 00:11:09.110 align:start position:0%
And that my friends is the
bench.<00:11:05.600><c> The</c><00:11:05.839><c> name</c><00:11:06.320><c> is</c><00:11:06.560><c> the</c>

00:11:09.110 --> 00:11:09.120 align:start position:0%
bench. The name is the
 

00:11:09.120 --> 00:11:12.230 align:start position:0%
bench. The name is the
Hey,<00:11:09.519><c> is</c><00:11:09.760><c> that</c><00:11:09.920><c> HTTP?</c><00:11:11.279><c> Get</c><00:11:11.519><c> that</c><00:11:11.760><c> out</c><00:11:11.920><c> of</c><00:11:12.000><c> here.</c>

00:11:12.230 --> 00:11:12.240 align:start position:0%
Hey, is that HTTP? Get that out of here.
 

00:11:12.240 --> 00:11:14.310 align:start position:0%
Hey, is that HTTP? Get that out of here.
That's<00:11:12.480><c> not</c><00:11:12.640><c> how</c><00:11:12.880><c> we</c><00:11:13.120><c> order</c><00:11:13.440><c> coffee.</c><00:11:13.839><c> We</c><00:11:14.079><c> order</c>

00:11:14.310 --> 00:11:14.320 align:start position:0%
That's not how we order coffee. We order
 

00:11:14.320 --> 00:11:17.190 align:start position:0%
That's not how we order coffee. We order
coffee<00:11:14.560><c> via</c><00:11:14.959><c> ssh</c><00:11:15.839><c> terminal.shop.</c><00:11:16.880><c> Yeah.</c><00:11:17.120><c> You</c>

00:11:17.190 --> 00:11:17.200 align:start position:0%
coffee via ssh terminal.shop. Yeah. You
 

00:11:17.200 --> 00:11:19.110 align:start position:0%
coffee via ssh terminal.shop. Yeah. You
want<00:11:17.360><c> a</c><00:11:17.519><c> real</c><00:11:17.760><c> experience.</c><00:11:18.320><c> You</c><00:11:18.480><c> want</c><00:11:18.720><c> real</c>

00:11:19.110 --> 00:11:19.120 align:start position:0%
want a real experience. You want real
 

00:11:19.120 --> 00:11:21.030 align:start position:0%
want a real experience. You want real
coffee.<00:11:19.760><c> You</c><00:11:19.920><c> want</c><00:11:20.160><c> awesome</c><00:11:20.560><c> subscriptions</c>

00:11:21.030 --> 00:11:21.040 align:start position:0%
coffee. You want awesome subscriptions
 

00:11:21.040 --> 00:11:23.269 align:start position:0%
coffee. You want awesome subscriptions
so<00:11:21.279><c> you</c><00:11:21.440><c> never</c><00:11:21.680><c> have</c><00:11:21.839><c> to</c><00:11:22.079><c> remember</c><00:11:22.399><c> again.</c><00:11:22.959><c> Oh,</c>

00:11:23.269 --> 00:11:23.279 align:start position:0%
so you never have to remember again. Oh,
 

00:11:23.279 --> 00:11:25.829 align:start position:0%
so you never have to remember again. Oh,
you<00:11:23.519><c> want</c><00:11:23.760><c> exclusive</c><00:11:24.399><c> blends</c><00:11:24.800><c> with</c><00:11:25.120><c> exclusive</c>

00:11:25.829 --> 00:11:25.839 align:start position:0%
you want exclusive blends with exclusive
 

00:11:25.839 --> 00:11:28.949 align:start position:0%
you want exclusive blends with exclusive
coffee<00:11:26.480><c> and</c><00:11:27.040><c> exclusive</c><00:11:27.920><c> content?</c><00:11:28.480><c> Then</c><00:11:28.720><c> check</c>

00:11:28.949 --> 00:11:28.959 align:start position:0%
coffee and exclusive content? Then check
 

00:11:28.959 --> 00:11:31.910 align:start position:0%
coffee and exclusive content? Then check
out<00:11:29.200><c> cron.</c><00:11:29.680><c> You</c><00:11:29.839><c> don't</c><00:11:29.920><c> know</c><00:11:30.000><c> what</c><00:11:30.240><c> SSH</c><00:11:30.720><c> is?</c>

00:11:31.910 --> 00:11:31.920 align:start position:0%
out cron. You don't know what SSH is?
 

00:11:31.920 --> 00:11:38.949 align:start position:0%
out cron. You don't know what SSH is?
&gt;&gt; Well,<00:11:32.160><c> maybe</c><00:11:32.240><c> the</c><00:11:32.480><c> coffee</c><00:11:32.640><c> is</c><00:11:32.880><c> not</c><00:11:33.040><c> for</c><00:11:33.200><c> you.</c>

00:11:38.949 --> 00:11:38.959 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:11:38.959 --> 00:11:43.560 align:start position:0%
 
Living<00:11:39.680><c> the</c><00:11:40.560><c> dream.</c>

