WEBVTT


00:00:00.060 --> 00:00:05.060
fruit smoothies I've said it before I'll say it again give fruit

00:00:05.061 --> 00:00:10.301
the boot even the fiber benefits of fruit are gone

00:00:10.302 --> 00:00:13.021
when you blend it no they're not that's false

00:00:13.022 --> 00:00:14.641
the fiber stays in the smoothie

00:00:14.642 --> 00:00:17.821
it might change the physical structure you know like chewing does

00:00:17.822 --> 00:00:20.941
but the fiber benefits are not gone when you use a blender

00:00:20.942 --> 00:00:24.361
are you confusing blending with juicing and human studies

00:00:24.380 --> 00:00:26.760
show wait this is not a human study

00:00:26.980 --> 00:00:29.460
why are you putting up a 16 year old laboratory food science

00:00:29.461 --> 00:00:32.641
study with no humans while you talk about human studies

00:00:33.180 --> 00:00:37.200
what else are you gonna say about this study that when you blend fruit

00:00:37.660 --> 00:00:41.280
it spikes your blood sugar exactly

00:00:41.420 --> 00:00:45.280
as if you were having fruit juice the study doesn't show that at all

00:00:45.380 --> 00:00:46.660
the study looked at how

00:00:46.661 --> 00:00:49.921
ultrafine grinding changed some properties of wheat bran

00:00:50.100 --> 00:00:52.140
it didn't look at fruit it didn't look at blending

00:00:52.141 --> 00:00:54.941
and it didn't measure glucose levels in humans it didn't even

00:00:54.942 --> 00:00:58.761
include humans why are you putting it on the screen as your evidence

00:00:59.080 --> 00:01:00.860
is it because there's no evidence to support

00:01:00.861 --> 00:01:03.621
what you're saying and you're banking on the fact that people won't check

00:01:03.622 --> 00:01:07.961
movie does the same thing because you've unlocked

00:01:08.380 --> 00:01:12.100
the sugar from the fiber and you absorb it

00:01:12.101 --> 00:01:14.221
as if the fiber wasn't there

00:01:14.222 --> 00:01:16.621
the ironic part here is that we actually do have human

00:01:16.622 --> 00:01:18.201
clinical trials that compare

00:01:18.220 --> 00:01:21.440
whole fruit to blended fruit on glucose responses

00:01:21.600 --> 00:01:24.380
like this one which compared whole mixed fruit with blended mixed

00:01:24.381 --> 00:01:27.301
fruit and found a significantly lower blood glucose response

00:01:27.302 --> 00:01:30.161
when the humans consumed the blended mixed fruit

00:01:30.440 --> 00:01:31.860
and even with a high glycemic

00:01:31.861 --> 00:01:34.921
fruit like mango they found similar blood glucose responses

00:01:34.940 --> 00:01:36.380
whether it was whole or blended

00:01:36.381 --> 00:01:39.161
or in this study they compared a whole apple and blackberries

00:01:39.180 --> 00:01:40.820
to blended apple and blackberries

00:01:40.821 --> 00:01:44.581
and once again found a 14 point reduction in peak blood glucose

00:01:44.582 --> 00:01:47.021
when blending the fruit and they definitely

00:01:47.022 --> 00:01:48.541
didn't find that the fiber wasn't

00:01:48.542 --> 00:01:51.861
there in fact they hypothesized that the lower blood sugar response

00:01:51.862 --> 00:01:54.501
from blending might be because blending releases

00:01:54.502 --> 00:01:57.181
dietary fiber particularly from fruits with seeds

00:01:57.182 --> 00:02:00.001
so you're just completely making up everything in your video

00:02:00.340 --> 00:02:03.420
anyway all this to say eat your fruit whole or blend your fruit

00:02:03.421 --> 00:02:05.141
Over 80% of us don't eat enough fruit

00:02:05.142 --> 00:02:08.055
anyway and are wasting our time listening to nonsense like this